🤨🤨🤨

Damn that sounds kinky

Fair enough lol

The problem with that is that she is not in disguise(unless you count the whole, moving her soul to a doll, thing. I dont cause like every one knows she did that.) And the name she gives you only has two different letters.

@@greenpinapple820 You might not have noticed, but autonomous marionettes and similar names are quite a common occurence in the Lands Between

@@greenpinapple820the only other source we heard about her is from Gidion and Rogier, and they both called her Ranni. so by telling her name as Renna to us, most people will not connect the dots until they meet her again. and most people wont even know where to look

Which is ironic because his father is nothing but respectful to you lol

"May the curse seep into thy very soul" that shit is the most venomous, hate-filled line ever uttered

Every playthrough, I like Morgott more and more. He's such a good rival. I wish he showed up more through the story. I would have taken 3, 4, even 5 different Morgott fights.

@@jesterofjuice5132 Commodus vs Marcus Aurelius

or kill margit

I hope you enjoyed. Thanks for watching!

Thanks! I'm glad you enjoyed it. Hopefully I'll be releasing one every two weeks, but that might be pretty optimistic

Definitely check out Sekiro (and Lies of P) for some tough, smart, modern boss fights

my first game was dark souls 3 on a friends console .. but i hated it when i played it... then a few years later i played bloodborne and fell in love with it.. sadly i fell on hard financial times and sold my ps4 before i got to complete it. elden ring was the 1st fromsoft game i played all the way through.. 3 times now. i am currently playing through dark souls 3 now that i understand fromsoft games and enjoy it much more than my first impressions of the game

I have just finished Dark Souls 3 and should be moving onto Sekiro soon

Ahhh that makes sense. Thanks for the info

@@jesterofjuice5132 no worries

I feel the same way. Probably the worst reuse in the game. At least when mogh and Morgott want to copy and paste themselves, they do it though a clone spell, rather than a son that's exactly the same asset as his father.

Most likely Martin had written about Golden Order dynasty/lineage and Godefroy's loyalist attack against Leyndell alliance. So Fromsoft wanted to include him in some capacity, considering this was a major event. And given that he is also grafter and might be previous holder of Godrick's Great Rune, maybe even brother, father, uncle or twin to Godrick, it would make sense he is of similar stature. Fromsoft most likely did not have time to model him to be slightly different. Considering he is minor encounter. And he might be Godrick's twin. We cannot know.

​@@matiasluukkanen7718 but still, couldn't they just have him use a grafted scion model instead of exact same as Godrick's? if they used a grafted scion, sure they could elaborate it into like, where godrick got the idea on how his grafted scions would look like, or even inspired godrick into taking grafting into a whole new level with his form. i get the idea that its lore, but they could've just altered godrick's model slightly for godefroy. and like i said, its an asset reuse of a MAIN, LEGACY dungeon boss. they didn't have to make a new one with new animations, just an altered version where godefroy doesn't look exactly the same as godrick, weapons and all.

Of course! Sorry for the delay

I think you’re also leaving out the massive fucking point of just travelling in general?

That one actually does make sense. Astel isn't the name of a character, its the species name for the final form of the falling star creatures. The Astel that we fight in ranni's quest is an important one, but isn't directly linked to her quest. It just happens to be in our way, I believe. That Astel is unique because it was "hewn into the erdtree," whatever that means lol

Now i feel stupid for my pronounciation of "Blaidd" called him blyat the whole playthrough

@@ich3730 siofra blaidd (cyka blyat)

Kino? Kino’der’toten?

It’s not rarer then you think, there’s tons of dumb dark souls one copers in every Elden Ring video

I think bloodborne is a good game but far from being on elden sekiro level

@@andrewramirez3998same here !! I LOVE blood borne but Elden Ring and Sekiro are another level for me. Elden rings amazing story, quality of the game, build variety, and freedom is unbeatable. Sekiros story is also great and how the world is perfectly connected leaving Ashina castle in the center of everything, and not to mention the combat system which alone makes it one of the greatest.

Nah, i fight them on foot and they’re great

They’re not bad but I think they’re kinda plain regardless of how you fights them. I much more prefer the tree sentinels to the nights Calvary

I'm not sure exactly what you mean. The second one is very clearly optional. I almost never bother to kill him unless I'm waiting to be summoned

@@jesterofjuice5132I think he means the one guarding Malikeths arena

@@jesterofjuice5132 he's optional, but you can't miss him. It's literally impossible. You're also clearly intended to fight him, though that's neither here nor there since you're clearly intended to fight a ton of optional repeated bosses. If somebody was looking for reasons to criticize the game and didn't like the idea of asset reuse, the draconic tree sentinel being ctrl-v'd in front of one of the final bosses of the game with zero moveset differences from its earlier appearance is a pretty egregious example. Personally I think asset reuse is fine (within reason, erdtree/putrid avatars are the only ones that truly wear out their welcome in ER imo) and bringing back shit from the early game for you to clown on is a lot of fun, but if your criteria is just "mandatory boss reuse" and you're ignoring something as only-technically distinct from mandatory boss reuse as the second tree sentinel, you're pretty obviously talking past what people who criticize elden ring's boss reuse are talking about.

@@Bajax godefroy is the boss that really made me say "come on fromsoft, what are you doing" they didn't even bother to change godrick's model for the evergaol boss. i'd rather have a boss that looks different and use the same animations than a complete 1:1 copy of a MAIN boss. heck, i'd even tolerate godefroy more if it had a grafted scion model.

No, it is.

@@bandiriatraveler8343 give me one good reason besides atmosphere, not saying it’s better in dark souls 1, but that’s the only thing you can’t really say Elden Ring does better because that’s so subjective

@@idontcare9661 Map design mostly. I enjoyed ER but wasn't fond of the open world I guess. It's all subjective really. Of course it also suffers from the same thing ER suffers from which is a rushed second half. I just enjoy the tighter design of Dark Souls I guess. I also enjoy the slower pace. I wish they'd go back to that in some way in a later title, but clean it up a little ya know?

@@idontcare9661I think the gameplay loop of ds is better. The areas are meticulous and well thought out. Not to say that er isn’t, but the only dungeon I thought was truly good, was stormveil. Don’t get me wrong, I love the aesthetics of the volcano manor and leyndell. But they didn’t have enough looping shortcuts from secret areas, or tying in to the open world like I’d hoped. The music in ds3 is also top tier. Other than the opening theme, which is radagons music, and mohg’s theme, I can’t remember a single track from ER, period. In ds1 you have that one track that slaps (gwynn), but in 3, you have all of them. Eudex gundir, midir, soul of cinder, the twin princes, the demon princes, gael, shit even the deacons of the deep was ight. So yea music killed it in ds imo Combat is arguable. Because I feel that is the main identity of their games. ER is an evolution. An event. Shit has elements from all their games and more tweaks. And I love them for it, and it’s more streamlined.. but it detracts from the skill it takes to genuinely HAVE to dodge their attacks and get used to being up in the bosses face. In ER yea no just run away a little, then jump attack spam or use ashes of war. This isn’t how I play so I enjoyed it, but it dilutes the community because we all didn’t suffer through it together. I think the drip.. is arguable as well. Nothing nobody else hasn’t said before I’m sure, but ER has some fire armor sets, but as someone who spends a lot of time mixing and matching to make unique characters, it is a pain in the ass to get good looking mixed sets. DS3, bro you can mix up just about anything you want and it’s tough as hell. I think it gives you more agency in how you want to play, because you can have your character be exactly what you think them up as. If that makes any sense. Bosses. Yea. Idk man they’re all iconic in ds1 and ds3, but I loved almost all of them in ER too so no gripes there. I just wish there were more spectacle pieces I guess? Like larger massive demons or whatever That’s just how I feel about the matter. I’ve never beaten ds2 so I don’t have any concrete opinions on that, other than it felt like shit. But I’d love to hear what you think and why you think ER is better

How do they feel janky exactly? I feel like Elden rings refined at least most of the design flaws that were extremely jank in fromsofts older games

Lady Maria is much more janky than any remembrance boss in Elden Ring, they are really well made across the board.

@@andrewramirez3998eldin beast is janky. Godskin duo is pretty janky. The stupid death rite birds are kinda janky too. I don’t mind though, I love eldin ring.

@@davismorgan99 godskin duo is just a poor reskin, the deathrite birds and Elden beast aren’t jank though they are just difficult

Bro doesn’t realize he can skip through the video

Did you just not understand the part where elite enemy is an insult? lol Grafted is bad. I never said otherwise. And again, you don't have to fight grafted 10 more times in mandatory fights. You're just wrong. And you're riding just as hard but for a game made by parasitic thieves for a quick cash grab

He criticised LOTF's enemy variety in his video, Elden Ring does great in that regard.

Elden Ring has a bunch of soldier archetypes reskinned for the different armies, a bunch of dark souls 2 golem reskins, bat/bird reskins and some fishmen. Apart from that it has 8 unique bosses (thus enemies) in the whole game that aren't repeated. I don't see much of a difference between the two. And souls games have always reused early bosses as end game enemies.@@facundovera3227

​@@BraidzMCElden Ring has 70 bosses without repeats, and enough normal enemies that I can't even count them. Maybe play the videogame next time.

Oh i just saw your other comment. I have 221 hours and just started a new playthrough to prep for the DLC. Doesn't make my statement any less true. Its a whole lot of padding, not enough premium. Basically, Elden Ring is Dark Souls 2 two.@@facundovera3227

It’s not a better game because it has more content it’s a better game because it’s a better game

Yo that take is crazy lol Bloodborne's combat is literally one of the worst in soulsborne. The cripple mechanic makes almost every beast fight a joke, the parry system ranges from zero risk freebee shots, to missing your shot for no reason, and you have to grind a resource just to attempt it. The trick weapons are incredibly basic and offer basically nothing to the combat except for overpowered combo moves that destroy every single boss if you use beast blood pellets. And you're comparing that to Elden Ring... The game with two extra jump moves added to every single weapon's moveset, not to mention crouching moves, and situations where you can jump over bosses moves. There's also the improved double and triple parrys, which are obviously more engaging than shooting a boss once from outside the range of their attack. Finally, there's a thousand different ashes of war and spells to offer a variety of playstyles which absolutely crushes the basic ass trick weapons system. Ds1's lore is literally just a creation myth with dragons and none of it makes sense. You can like it more if you want, but fantasy nonsense certainly doesn't objectively compare to a well crafted story with many twists, turns, betrayals and loyalties within the main ruling families' backstory. All of which was written by George R R Martin, who has like 50 years of experience writing political fantasy. Once again, your opinion doesn't mesh with reality. Ds3 does have incredible bosses, and this is the only thing you've said that makes objective sense. However, the quality of ds3's bosses comes from its combat being incredibly basic. The only useful way to fight in ds3 is through simple dodge then attack combat, highlighted by having almost no parryable bosses. I love ds3, but it doesn't take many risks, whereas Elden ring's combat and bosses offer, triple parry, jumpable moves, ashes of war, spirit summons, and even horse combat. There is no real comparison, Ds3 perfected an archaic system, Elden Ring evolved that system to an insanely higher degree. And yeah, maybe it has the same amount of enemy variation, but the mandatory content is rich with unique assets. Once again I say, You choose to play the optional content that would obviously reuse assets, and now you're complaining about seeing optional content. Clearly you have no idea what objectively means, because you've given the absolute worst examples to use in your comment, except for ds3, and you clearly just like them It is objectively the best one, and if you watch the rest of the series, maybe you'll find out why, instead of getting upset and writing a ridiculous comment, followed by saying, "fuck this..."

I personally believe that it comes down to preference. Elden ring is currently my favourite even though I’m halfway through Bloodborne right now. Elden ring was also my first game from the soulsborne series so I might have that kind of bias. A lot of these games come down to subjectivity, and I don’t believe there to be very many objectively better things, but rather different things. For example, my personal favourite world is Elden rings, this might be an objective fact in some peoples eyes because it’s massive and the sense of discovery and secrets hidden everywhere is mind blowing. However, dark souls 1 also boasts levels that are more finely crafted and interconnected, making the game space feel very open and immersive. Neither of these are objectively better than the other. Its preference. Combat wise Elden ring boasts the most amount of options and also in my opinion the best combat system, because of those options. However, the bosses sometimes don’t take full advantage of this, leaving the pinnacle moments of the game’s combat feeling a bit flat sometimes. You are also able to essentially customise the difficulty to a frankly absurd level and some of the bosses in my first playthrough required little to no mastery, just spamming ashes of war. I do believe the feeling of bloodborne’s combat is better with hit registration and feedback, the camera shake, blood spray and overall impact feels so good. However, saying Bloodborne has better combat is definitely a matter of opinion, and definitely could be down to the more fine tuned nature of the game. The bosses probably had more time to be worked on, the same goes for the combat encounters and the enemies. Maybe those were perfected, but for me the actual system of Elden ring is superior. I agree with the lore for now though. Dark souls 1 lore is more than just worldbuilding to flesh out the world. It’s not only context, but pivotal to the philosophical ideas of the game. While Elden ring’s lore has more potential as of right now and may even surpass dark souls in the future with dlc updates, dark souls one has a very cohesive theme that all the lore refers back to and it’s genuinely amazing learning about the characters from that game. I can see the appeal of Elden ring’s lore, but the theme and mood of it just doesn’t hit the same highs as dark souls 1 does for me. However, the dlc may rectify this because right now the world of Elden ring is nowhere near complete. I agree with you both on some of your points, and I personally believe Elden ring to be the best, but I can’t deny that the other games have impacted me more in other ways that Elden ring hasn’t, and vice versa

me when ive lost my mind:

I couldn't be asked to count every single enemy. But Elden Ring has 70 unique bosses, that's more than any game in the Souls series, the only one that compares is Bloodborne.

That’s a minority opinion my man

I think the dark souls series was pretty concisely wrapped up within the trilogy. However, I would be happy to see another game in that style, though, I would by no means say that the open world was detrimental. If you boss rush from legacy dungeon to legacy dungeon, the game functions very similarly to Dark souls.

@@certifiedcib7958 i dont doubt it

It is objectively

It is though.

my g you could at least make an argument instead of a statement with no explanation

Ah the angry boomers are here