A.I. art is not real art
Рет қаралды 4,742
2 ай бұрынA.I. is the new king of content town.
Unlike prior technologies, AI does not place humans in the driver’s seat of the creative process. It removes them entirely.
The artist does not use their hands or eyes to sculpt a scene before them, but merely a sentence, phrase, or a series of disparate words.
By demoting the artist from imaginative creator to prompt engineer, AI transforms the artist from the originator of the image to a cog in the machine of prior images. The artist does not imagine the world, it is imagined for them by the algorithm. The artist does not remember their inspirations, the machine remembers. The artist does not create, she chooses options of what is created for her. (Part of the creative process, the misremembering of past inspiration, is lost). The imagination is deadened by the perfection of the dataset. The greater the dataset, the less the artist needs to imagine. At scale, the artist becomes redundant for basic tasks.
Based on an essay I wrote which can be read here: newintrigue.com/2024/03/21/ar...
Subscribe for more video essays!
#aiart #aiartgenerator #aiartwork #aigenerated #artificialintelligence #artificialintelligencefacts
Music by Myuu and Twin Musicom.
Credit to demonflyingfox for the opening AI generated video 'Harry Potter in Berlin': • Harry Potter but in Be...
Credit to CuriousRefuge for the video on Star Wars in the Style of Wes Anderson: • Star Wars by Wes Ander...
@purplemicrodot58 Ай бұрын
So agree. An A.I. image is no more art than a dog's pawprint.
@divinethrash4206 Ай бұрын
That’s still natural and made organically
@SteveWeas Ай бұрын
Is this essay AI generated?
@joshuakrook1 Ай бұрын
No, but that would be funny. The examples are from AI images but the text is normal.
@purplemicrodot58 Ай бұрын
That's a hilariously relevant question. 🤣
@bmodoryx Ай бұрын
While I don't disagree, I've yet to encounter a single definition for "Art"
@blu12gaming44 Ай бұрын
Have you ever considered the possibility that artists can't directly interact with generative AI because it's still very new??? Before Photoshop, Blender, Maya, etc. universities were still working on particular algorithms to get things to just work, and didn't yet implement user friendly GUIs and tools. Instead of bemoaning the death of art as we know it (because it isn't): you should focus on pushing the need for interactivity/user-input for AI-based tools, which will inevitably happen anyway because prompts can only go so far.
@theothertonydutch Ай бұрын
Mate. AI-art plagiarizes all other art.
@1jotun136 Ай бұрын
Butlerian Jihad
@jjsc3334 Ай бұрын
Nothing is real
@NathanLorenzana Ай бұрын
This is misleading, due to ignorance or purposefully. There is a huge difference between images generated ONLY through text, and artwork assisted with AI. Both use AI, but the method varies greatly. This is causing confusion and hypes up AI to a level that it will never be able to achieve, because applied arts is problem solving and art is about an experience translated into a medium. Images generated with text is a roll of the dice, and assuming this random element is somewhat a threat is not founded in reality. Be careful. Plus, a quick search here in KZfaq demonstrates that people wanting to make money with AI art is the biggest challenge of all, not because it's AI, but because the business of art itself is a tough one to break into AND sustain in the long term. Every one of those videos have people making less than $30 profit in their experiments. Do your homework.