LIKE, SHARE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos everyday 👉kzfaq.info/love/WkLJgGBIqY9wsuEayeCkZwjoin A Scientifically Uncomfortable Truth | The Joe Rogan Experience #1959 David Buss, PhD, is a founding figure in the field of evolutionary psychology and a professor at the University of Texas at Austin. His primary research focuses are on human mating strategies, conflict between the sexes and the psychology of prestige, status and reputation. He is the author of several books, among them: “The Evolution of Desire: Strategies of Human Mating”, and “When Men Behave Badly: The Hidden Roots of Sexual Deception, Harassment and Assault”. www.davidbuss.com Source: The Joe Rogan Experience @ www.spotify.com Host: Joe Rogan @joerogan Guest: David Buss Producer: Jamie Vernon @jamievernon #jre #joerogan #thejoeroganexperience Image Powered by Pexels
@chriso3407 Жыл бұрын
With regards to David's colleagues who put forward the "blank slate" theory, how do they explain precoded actions in all other animals that occur without being taught such as salmon spawnings, migration patterns, the knowing of edible foods, the knowing of traits that define the most attractive mating partners. Many many more that can only be assigned to genetic engineering. It's true with all animals including the human species. To be born with a blank slate is to be born severely handicapped resulting in an extremely short life.
@giovannyruiz67355 ай бұрын
OR to be perfect all at the same time
@domgullo918111 ай бұрын
Wait! Men and women are different ? Thank God for science
@alidabirnia288211 ай бұрын
I think the idea that women seek the man with the ability to acquire resources is somewhat of an oversimplification in terms of the psychology of these interactions. Sometimes it's just not being boring. An artist, who is particularly skilled and creative, has a mysterious quality. They can display brilliance, feelings beyond our everyday experiences, or any other experience. One who is safe, someone one can be themselves around. There's something about some connections that can go beyond animal mating strategies, though on many levels it's exactly that, in terms of initial attraction. What women want is similar on some levels, and completely different in other senses.
@Schopenhauer693 ай бұрын
You're talking about exceptions. For the most part, starving artists are the least successful at finding mates, unless they happen to be very attractive. I once came across a street artist with a beautiful wife. I was surprised she would choose him but my common sense kicked in and realized that the man/artist was very good looking and in great shape.
@bkb04g2 ай бұрын
@@Schopenhauer69You're wrong buddy. Women want men who have competence in unique fields and will sacrifice pay for happiness. You can make lots of money but if your profession is waste management and you're boring, good luck...
@Schopenhauer692 ай бұрын
@@bkb04g Ummm...you pretty much reiterated what I said. 😐
@bkb04g2 ай бұрын
@@Schopenhauer69 No i didnt....The rule is women want those who are interesting and make them happy and only settle or boring guys with money as the exception. Starving artists pull more women than rich boring old men anyday. Is that clear?
@Schopenhauer692 ай бұрын
@@bkb04g only if they're attractive
@aarishtickoo93892 ай бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/lbd6ZrBpssW2hWw.html 2:30 is the exact same thing David is saying at 4:15
@Misty-js4vv9 ай бұрын
How did Patriarchy derive from female selection when women didnt have the option to select mates? They were either forced, presented with a few options, or taken by force. Our ability to chose partners without interfernce from a male guardian is something new and not even possible in certain countries 😅
@christopherowe1079 ай бұрын
That’s not true. Even cavewomen chose mates. In Indegenous culture the strongest warrior would have 2-3 or more wives. This wasn’t the Fathers choice. Give yourself more credit.
@Agamemnon-oy9qt8 ай бұрын
The problem is that no matter how small their choice may be, it is present and creates a certain evolutionary pressure, which, again, influences their choice. (Through adultery, silent premarital relations, etc.)
@Misty-js4vv8 ай бұрын
@@Agamemnon-oy9qt What??? So if women had all this choice then why are there short men? Wouldn't they been bred out long ago.
@Misty-js4vv8 ай бұрын
@@christopherowe107 yes, the strongest warrior would get 2-3 wives...the wives were given to the man by their FATHER because the FATHER recognized the man as a strong warrior. The woman more than likely could not refused, did not matter if she wanted to marry the warrior or not. It was an expectation of her. My theory is men are hypergamous because everything hyerpergamous matches with men's nature.
@Agamemnon-oy9qt8 ай бұрын
@@Misty-js4vv Because women are controlled by men, that's why female mate preferences in partners are not allowed to play out to their fullest. And it is patriarchy.