Thank you Lawrence, having all these gentlemen together for a conversation is a gift, peace

Excellent....i always especially enjoy listening to Mr Guth

A stellar night of stellar minds! Thanks a billion^3 Lawrence!

Dr. Krause, thank you for hosting the gentlemen and providing a delightful and insightful program. In addition, thanks for keeping in check your personal biases and snide remarks about listener’s/ people’s beliefs and personal perspectives, which must have been tough on you. Again, thanks for a great show.

Thank you for sharing, I hope more people are able to see the true science geniuses of our time through videos like this! What strikes me is that they are all so down to earth and humble people, such a joy to see them talking and discussing their ideas. Please, keep sharing more videos like this.

Amazing content. Thank you all!

Fantastic Cosmology Event. Thankyou Lawrence. Viewed from Copenhagen, Denmark, EU

giants in their field. love hearing their ideas and explanations and their passion for understanding our universe.

Great show, great experts educating about the edge of knowledge on the field. I hope the Origins program can continue to satisfy curious minds with high-quality information and entertainment sessions.

How wonderful! Thank you ✌🏼💕

Great subjects , great panel!

Incredible times when we can see Nobel laureates teaching from our homes

Thank you for this... Truly appreciated

Wow I missed the „“ Nobel Winning Scientists Festival Podcast „“ …. Let’s watch it now. Thank you very much for the podcast.

As a fellow Carleton University Alumnus, Thank you Dr. Krauss for being a great Carleton ‘Raven’ 🐦‍⬛!

Thank you Dr Krauss 🙏🏽

Hi, se it from Portugal, great minds all the best.

Thanks

An amazing presentation. So much brilliance. Thanks to Lawrence and all the presenters.

Just amazing, great talk.

Wonderful event. loved Guthic ending

Thank you!

Absolutely love the conversation really educational and covers so many fascinating subjects, Dr Krauss, are you going to have a conversation with Brian Greene in the not too distant future ? He’s been just like you one of my favourites when it comes to science communicators, folks who can give me goosebumps when they talk about science , I bet it’s going to be just as fascinating a conversation

Thank you!!!!!!

Bang What was that It was nothing Just the beginning in fact Nothing here nothing there But everything everywhere Time,Gravity,love just to name a few All is not known But all is true Thank you Larry, way more interesting than 😮religion

Fantastic panel and host, probably the greatest collection of minds on the subjects to have been put together for an event. While some of it is more detailed than I'm familiar with, one thing that I did go a little 'huh?' about was the response to question about the end of universe.. I was expecting the ' heat death / entropy' answer, but then had to re-think why.

very good to be wrong...seems to be the best point....when moving forward....fantastic!!

Quite the line up. Nice job.

What a great minds!

Very interesting and informative.

Hopefully, you'll make it to the UK. I know friends and I from the occupied six counties of Ireland 🌈💚☘️💞🧚✨ would be delighted to hear you speak. 🤞

I will personally buy doctor Guth a better microphone. Constant consumers of prolific science communicators unite!

The fist guy I would want to ask if they looked at the CMB for hawking radiation contributions? Could the CMB cold spot be caused by a hawking radiation trail? Did they look for imprints of Cherenkov radiation in the CMB berionic calculations? Did they calculate the barionic melt% onto neutrino layer? Second person I would ask. In neutron stars do your models have fluidic neutrinos at the core? I know you calculated the electron degenerative area, but would you consider that a transition layer? 3rd person I would ask. Have you ever detected a gravitational super wave? Like ocean super waves but for gravity. Have you tested for gravitational wave/field and particle production from the vacuum and quantum foam? Have you modeled the inner layers of a black hole? Like what the CNB (cosmic neutrino background) shows but in a black hole. The fluidic neutrino layer along a boundary inside a black hole and the % of melt on the precipitation side of the neutrinos. The fermionic to berionic boundary layer. Do you think there is a ghost boojum in black holes? XD OK now the 4th person Mr. Gunth did you model the natural layers in highly curved space? Would you be OK with a non FTL in a vacuum inflation? The layers get a medium for FTL and cherenkov radiation during inflation. Oh lol you jumped to string theories. It fails in ways. No natural cutoff limit/regime for the energy/mass of the universe we see. Even with dimensional collapse pushing energy into the 3+1 we see. String theories need work. Oh no now you went to multiverse theories. lol The quantum version's are people screwing up on levels quantum optics has resolved. Mitchio really should know better. The version's that are possible no one talks about. But no overlapping type. Oh and no fermionic matter through a worm hole without a bridge space. Paulie rules. Sorry no one to talk about this stuff to here. No socials here to talk with about R=0 might be a virtual particle. Or protomass that splits off to our universe. Or a sister universe many google light years out/over. Or the inner layers of a black hole. Particles that not only get spegetified, but also get smeared across space/time as radiation. From one end to the next. The layers of censorship within a black hole. Or the propagation from a center point through layers to a 12.5 light year diameter flash over. FTL in mediums/layers that act specific ways. Ghost boojum with possible alice rings on the surface. Alice strings at the poles inside black holes. Snark graph QCD with tweedle sets inside a black hole. From center out. Vs. Golden ratio. Particle production types in energy densities regimes. Natural cutoffs and limits. Oh well I have said a lot for a post. To bad I have no one to chat with about this stuff. Good luck in wonderland. 😂

Question: what happens to “space” (ignore time for the moment) under expansion? If it is made up of Planck size quanta, does each quanta get stretched, or new ones are generated ipso facto and fill up the lacunae? Now, consider “time.” Provided that the speed of light, c, is constant, could we actually answer this question?

Hi from Jester Moon In Calgary The Wizard of Silly, I love your work Stay Safe and Stay Free 2:42 😂🎉

If I could see any further it’s because I stood on the shoulders of giants- Isaac newton

Such an underrated Scientist and human being. His book “Atom”? It’s the greatest story of all time…so far. See what I did there? Bringing a little levity

I wonder, do gravitational waves have any effect on the measurement problem physics has to deal with when trying to track the movements of quantum objects?

Since I have no gold, I am void of neutron star matter! 😢 Before the first time I heard that it comes from neutron star collisions I never saw much other value in it than it's uses in electronics as corrosion protection..., and it pains me that so many that hoard it wouldn't even know where it comes from, nor give a crap if they did, which is even worse than knowing but not having any!

Hello, I have a question for you . Please don't assume any predispositions on my side. What if a tree died while standing upright 5 million years ago. It was then buried over 5 million years to the present day. Is the tree 5 million years old as I would assume it would be, and if so, how is it that the lower parts of the tree would be completely fossilized having good contract with the soil, the upper parts should be missing having rotted away ? The actual tree passes through all 5 layers.

Gonna have to put time back on the nature vertical idealism avis

Lawrence really missed an alternate career timeline as a comedian- that intro joke

thanks for the meal after the talk, i think kip has my wallet still though.

What's a magnetic mono pole? Stop in the flow, no change. No feedback, no movement. A steady state; well change must be an illusion. Now we have another illusion regarding what we see. It seems to me our physics leaves us with no place to stand. Yet we stand on something and it changes.

1:04:30 Repulsive gravity, my guess would be gravity and dark energy are the same thing, and its time dilation that creates the "constant acceleration " that is gravitational pull. Three dimensional manifolds that exist on a four dimensional structure and the structure is "stretching" due to mass, ie, dark energy. Thats my guess. It's probably wrong.

I was bourne in the middle of the last century and live in the 1st quarter of this century. Recon this with the century before I was bourne, and the 1st quarter of the 20th century; me thinks we've slipped behind. Virtually no change since the 60's. We've already surpassed star trek, yet no better functioning propulsion systems. An F for failed and an A for luxury.

You can’t tell someone to smile and not move… you should know that dr. Krauss

With love and apololgies to Eric Idle (to misquote " The Galaxy Song" from Monty Python's "The Meaning Of Life") : "Whenever life gets you down... ...Just remember... ...how insignificant was your birth, and if there's intelligent life somewhere out in space, there's bugger-all down here on the Earth!" There is now controversy on the previous 'guesstimates' of the age of the Universe was too short, with better observational technology - the JWST - and our already approximately 'guesstimated' accepted universal age at ~13.6 billion years was approximately 4 times the time we also 'guesstimate' that the Earth has supported living things, despite a 'guesstimated' beginning of the fossil record, and the potential biological (un)friendliness of the pre-Cambrian Earth's oceans. Yet we also 'guesstimate' that life began upon Earth, rather than the 4(+) times more probable likelihood that life may have originated elsewhere in our galaxy, if not elsewhere in our universe. Both archaic cells and modern multicellular life has been shown to survive lyophilization and exist unchanged under harsh conditions that may exist in meteorites travelling through space that enter the Earth's atmosphere in the order of several tonnes every day, and that such bombardment was more intense earlier in the Earth's history. We are so parochial in our thinking that life originated here in conditions on the primordial Earth, and cannot believe that we are looking at the wrong conditions, in the wrong place(s) and at the wrong time(s). If this is so, 'guesstimates' is all we have to look forward to, and will inevitably be wildly wrong. If there is negative gravity, and why shouldn't there be, it would cause bumps, rather than depressions in the Einsteinian space-time continuum. I'd really like to see evidence of that! Perhaps we would have to live on the other side of a black hole, and of course all would seem totally normal to us.

Lurk allot.

Don't forget to tell them your mother wanted you to be a lawyer.

Minute 14, he says "Galaxy" way too many times, to feel big

Well it seems we've got the age of the universe wrong, never mind I'm sure we can adjust inflation.

The world ends when you dies you assend into athirium atriums a glastonbery torr us fields.

why are the views so low? did you buy subscribers or something?

Lawrence, you are a (rat).. I remember that before LIGO published about gravitational waves, you anticipated its publication😂 now with your Origens podcast, you have made a great program, my congratulations to you.

Like politicians science takes credit for what the stugling masses manage to climb out of.

Adspam

I'm a huge fan of Lawrence, but hoping he can knock off the political jokes for a laugh. It's a scientific fact , we ALL live in the same galaxy.

Can’t help having a swipe at Republicans. I immediately turned off.

What if their wrong? Decades or maybe hundreds of years of stagnation is ahead. We have 3 choices, religion, standard theory or ET physics; which is correct? Glad I'll be dead before these lurking phantoms destroy humanities chance to go out there. F for failed again.

Multiverse fantasy.

Origins is always too long. Lawrence is too gabby, doesn't get to the point.

166 people watching this....MILLIONS watching kardashians....find 1 fault in that sententce.

Why Allan does not yet have a Nobel Prize? Well, because his theory of inflation has more holes than swiss cheese .