Oh no, The Instructor!

Before I clicked on the video, I thought it'd be full of venturing, tempting, and becoming the monarch, but I like this take on it instead.

this is litterly like a meme, „fuck you, *unreads your card*”

Yeah this is basically spot on. I hate what I've created here

You should somehow get this into shuffle Up and Play

Ty, ty

Jokes on him because I can actually read Phyrexian

And Elven from LotR?

​@@RedBobcatGames I cant but I do know people who can read it, its a legit languange😂

@@RedBobcatGamesSindarin

What a beautiful set of hands that would be

Sam from Rhystic Studies could probably make a deck idea of something this ridiculous

Learning phyrexian makes me want to pull my hair out

Don't you mean Post, son of Rich?

Up coming spoiler: Charlie sld

Ha, yeah I hadn't considered that!

"Today Im going to play a Commander deck with an above average Word count "

tbh it probably has more because most of the phyrexian cards are pretty wordy.

Haha, excellent

I think you meant *sadomasochist* there Original Commenter.

Oh wow, I didn't pick up on that. That's actually great!

@@RedBobcatGames I can't believe you missed that despite pointing right at it in the video /s That is actually hilarious though.

Haha! How could I miss it!

@@RedBobcatGames I mean, according to the rules, you can say that it gives your goblins +1/+1 and mountainwalk, and ommit it also affects your opponent's goblins

Ha! You're welcome?

Glad you specified English dub lol Thank you

At least anime characters are legally obliged to explain what their cards do, even when the opponent already knows.

​@@yurisei6732 how else would anyone know that pot of greed allows you to draw two cards from the top of your deck?

BUT WHAT DOES POT OF GREED DO????

ty ty

Haha, yup

I knew you would include those as soon as i realized what you were going for😂

Bro, i have, like 2 swamps with full text, and a swamp that put back a creature from the grave in the top, so EVERYTIME i put a swamp in thr table, i have to explain if is the full text or the "revive" one.

I was gonna comment a suggestion along the lines of "clearly what this deck needs is the over-explained basic lands, because the only thing better than omitting text that people would really like to read during a game, is including an excessive amount of text for cards that everyone knows the mechanics of." The fact Bobcat beat me to it makes me very happy.

Now I want to see a full text full deck. Sadly, I don't think those variants have been as jumped on by Hasbeens of the Coast.

okay, but what does ancestral recall do?

That's not what it does-YES IT IS

@@teddymason6069 That is what is does, draw 3, put two back.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/d7ueg7FknZvbfH0.htmlsi=7JiyL8Lx_ZrB3Qrp

Okay, this might be one of my favourite comment threads on a video so far. Well played everyone

Oh... oh no... if I ever get invited I couldn't... could I?

​@@RedBobcatGamesyou might be able to pitch it to him if the joke is you bring this deck, he brings his Deck of the Future that has stickers and all the most annoying to keep track of mechanics of all time, and the other two players are in the dark that the gimmick of the episode is they are about to get epically trolled by the two of you. Since you don't want to ruin the experience of a celebrity guest, the other players should be either Sam, Spice8Rack, or Pleasant Kenobi, pick two. Or if you want to permanently ingratiate yourself to WotC, make it an episode where he gets Gavin Verhey on the show again and the third player brings some other absolutely evil idea from the company's list of very bad decisions. (Or, you know, just see if you can find two more aweful deck concepts like these and have a laugh)

​@@RedBobcatGames You show up with 4 copies of a cheat sheet, so that everyone playing looks like they're trying to read a script the whole time!

Oh my god, that's actually great. 4 copies of this awful awful deck. I love it

It would be especially great considering the prof’s catch phrase.

Yes! I love it! Please let me know how it goes. I'm very sorry in advance if people become annoyed at you!

And that's the Deck name forevermore. Fill in the Blanks!

Isn't that how a Richard Garfield PhD deck would work anyway?

@@ryangainey94 not really, from how I understand stand it you can just make any 2 mana spell be any other 2 mana spell. Like counter spell into arcane signet. just cus you can

Hey, it's cool. Finish it anyway, there's enough spite to go round and I'd love to see it!

@@RedBobcatGames oh I for sure will. Thanks for putting me onto those poker face cards, they’re perfect since my deck is Jund

Sick

Haha, thank you?

Oof, yeah

Anymore?

I think that once they had more consideration for magic as a game

*most* of these textless cards were made 10+ years ago. and idk, i’ve been playing magic very often for like a year and have seen exactly one of these cards ever actually played in a deck

??? These are all alternate versions of cards that already exist, nobody’s forcing you to play these

Oh yeah excellent. It's about time someone stuck it to those lazy judges. They've really got it coming haha

That makes a lot more sense. “Cards are considered to have their oracle text” probably means you can’t point at a blank card and pretend it doesn’t have any additional effects.

Yeah, pretty much. Your opponent has a right to know what it does, but you have the right to not tell them. Weird

I have seen judges rule that if a card has no readable text due to being textless or due to being in another language you have to give the full oracle text on request or be penalized

I recall something similar, but I don't remember if it was enforced at all events.

Haha, do it. I'd love to see what can top this

Right? I was wondering how many people would pick up on that

Truth is, the game was rigged from the start.

@@RedBobcatGames I did because I'm reasonably certain I own a copy of his Legends printing somewhere.

@matthewgagnon9426 Oh that's cool. I like the card, so was glad to include it here

I bet that deck is insane, how fun!

Just learn phyrexian. It is a learnable language, maybe not a read-Out-loud language but a language nonetheless

@nilsuper5293 This is terrible advice and I am here for it. 100% on board.

I am doing the same with a Brimaz, bright of Oreskos.

@@nilsuper5293 oh trust me I am TRYING, would try to speak it too but I don't have enough throat knives or the internal metal scrape plates

Ha, fair

To be fair, if only because of font size and background color: yugioh cards can't be read, so it doesn't really matter whether or not the players can read.

@stevenmcclary534 the implication Is that we have short attention spans and the cards have long text. So we just assume what the opponents cards say the card does is correct and only have a vague notion of what our own cards do. WAe can read the cards we normally choose not to. Explaining the joke and what not.

Apparently that's legal if they don't ask! It's mad!

​@RedBobcatGames it's not legal at any REL. That's misrepresentating what a card does and, by virtue of it being done repeatedly, is clearly cheating

Fair. Personally I wouldn't recommend trying to play this deck even casually though if I'm being honest. I hate it!

Ha! Then it's perfect!

100% agreed

Agreed. Like if those poker face secret lairs were vanilla creatures, all the information is still on the card. It's just ambiguous if number and suit means x mana of that color or x of any mana and one of that color. Which is easy enough to memorize

Agreed

@@AbsolXGuardian Just for the record, the number means colourless mana, as Goblin King has two Red suit symbols

@@CJtheentity Ah. See this is a perfect secret layer for vanilla (or even French vanilla, with the keyword just under creature type in the portrait) creatures, just not the creatures they used

Well there's always the bonus card don't forget. 6 is much better, right?

​@@RedBobcatGames If only to soothe the pain of spending a minimum of $30 (before tax and shipping) on 5 other cards that will never see play.

Yup, I have purchased a single Secret Lair in the past, and it was the 10 card land reprint of that sort of rubbish Innistrad cycle in black and white. It wasn't cheap, but when I saw the bonus card was a Forest from Morningtide I vowed never again

I mean, in fairness they would be I suspect

fun fact, actually: the gibberish cards are written in a perfectly readable language... you just need to learn it.

That fact didn't sound like fun! It sounded like a lot of hard work haha

Technically the fake text is legitimate, it’s just in a language invented specifically for Magic

They’re alternate printings of cards that do have text, these are mostly for collector value

Oh man, you'd have to be very rich. Some of these cards are EXPENSIVE!

Especially One particular card

Yeesssss... YESSSS! EVERY CARD IS JUST A DIFFERENT COPY OF QUESTING BEAST! YES!

Isnt that basically all modern edh decks? My 5c legends deck already has almost ten lines of text on every card and to this day I still find new combos

@@actuallyKriminell probably not? I am counting lands as well and most modern deck mana bases have 5-6 lines of text per card at most. so for commander, it'd have to be like all the LOTR lands, the channel lands, and even the flip lands like hostile hostel or hawkin's national laboratory. and then you do the funny thing and have one card that does the monarchy, one card that takes the initiative, one card that ventures into the dungeon (for the other 3 dungeons) one card with daybound/nightbound, one card with "ring tempts you" and maybe planeswalkers with emblems idk. then you can add MORE cards to commander as a rule 0. for example, the bounty cards can be added, then planechase cards, then archnemisis cards, and if you want to do this with unsets, add in attractions as well. I may be missing some extra small things as well, but it'd be a deck that doesn't feel like a 100 card deck.

@@boatghost2543 This sounds so incredibly miserable. Truly a deck for people that are just done with life

I made a sphinx tribal commander deck that turned into that. First match and I began to dread my turn when it arrived, as it'd mean having to scour through the wall of text that was every sphinx creature I had.

As you may have guessed from basically any of my vidoes, I love Innistrad. I have two of those decks you just mentioned, and I'm working on a third!

You can lie about certain things. There's a few cards that even encourage it, especially anything that to do with facedown cards or ones that ask players to vote

@@RedBobcatGames sure, but what the morph card you just played is and what you are thinking of choosing for Trap the Trespassers are private information, not derived.

Ahh, I reread your original comment and yeah. I misunderstood and thought you were saying you couldn't lie in the game at all. My apologies

​@@RedBobcatGames Yeah, I think in this case it's more of a "you can't say your Tarmogoyf is a 2/3 when you have four different card types in your graveyard."

Ha! Well that still counts. I made sure to lay it on thicker as time went on, but also was a touch worried I was coming off as very mean. I'm glad it still reads as a joke though, so that's good. Thank you for the comment

Haha, thank you thank you

Yeah, but Omanth's not bad with 4. I think. I actually can't remember which version of Omnath it is. Oh god, this is exactly my point

​@@RedBobcatGamesthe landfall one (the only one playable in modern right now). On first landfall gain 4 life, on second landfall add X mana (maybe WUBRG? Or is it only 4 mana? Wait, it's not a 5c commander so it can't be WUBRG) and on third landfall deal Y damage (how many?) to a target (what kind? any target or target player?)

@@laytonjr6601 All the Xs are 4 on this omnath. 4 mana 4/4, gsins 4 life, makes 4 mana, deals 4 to (i want to say) any target. I only remember cause my friend made a number 4 deck with this as the commander where every card had a 4 on it

@@uriel7395 It's 4 damage to each opponent and each Planeswalker you don't control (not that you could ever trigger 3 landfall with this deck). Searching Omnath on Scryfall gives first the Arena rebalanced version which is 5 mana so I was confused for a second

​​@@laytonjr6601you forgot about the etb draw a card, landfall 2 is WURG, and landfall 3 is 4 damage to each opponent and each Planeswalker they control

Yeah, I made a point of that card being the first one I wouldn't even slightly explain. I did wonder how many people would pick up on that

i typically refer to jedit ojanen as the worst card ever printed, but i would totally use it if i had that version. it's the only one that actually makes sense since it doesn't have any text and looks amazing.

Oh I don't know about worst. One With Nothing has to be up there. And some of those old school Phyrexians are all downside. And isn't there a creature from Futuresight that has 0 toughness?

I was so happy too! My cat is named Jedit Ojanen, so I thoroughly know he does nothing. Lol

@klaghzyn8124 Very good!

That's the best bit to be honest

Ahhh, okay. So YOU'RE the one?

See, this is the issue. I made this deck and even I don't remember what Incinerate does

I knew basically all of the burn spells, because my first deck used most of them at one point (ah, for the days when I did have an encyclopedic knowledge of everything from Zendikar block on. That came to an end around Kaladesh)

Yeah, I'm similar. I don't know cards, but I know the gist of a set and sort of go from there

Ha, glad to be of service

Oh god. Don't tell them this was my idea! I'll make enemies!

Comment of the day award nominee

Haha, that's weird. I'll look into it, probably just an error. Thank you

Ah why thank you very much

Yeah, I had the cards in front of me on the screen and even I didn't remember. This deck sucks

@@RedBobcatGames Well I can’t forget it’s effect now after playing The Master Transcendent I need one creature to survive the goblin onslaught from my opponent and win on the crack back. My opponent milled a goblin king from radiation and I was happy for 5 seconds.

Haha, fair

Errrr, yes? If I can figure out an easy way to do it? If I get a chance tomorrow (and I remember) I'll make a free page on my Patreon that's a list of the cards

Yeah, they felt appropriate

Oh why thank you very much. Yeah, I just hope I don't become known in the community as "That guy that makes the awful decks everyone hates" haha

Yeah, it got crazy in March of the Machine. Some of the cards in those sets got something like 8 printings. It's mad

Yup, I watched that the other day too and while there's not a massive amount of cross over I feel some of the vibes are similar. It's lined up pretty nicely in terms of timing

Thank you!

Oh boy! Okay, but don't blame me when people get mad haha

Oh yeah? Easy as that. Should be a snap once I've figured out Elvish from LotR. (I say this jokingly, but I know there will be people who have learned both those languages for real)

I mean, pretty much right? Especially if they're sleeved. I wonder if that's what they were hinting at with Magic30? Those were basically just very expensive proxies

Haha, I support this. If it wasn't just me making these, captions would literally be the first thing I'd ask someone else to do

Just a cool couple of mil. No biggie haha

Thank you, I love all of your comments!

Haha, that's just evil. So I feel it fits the theme of the deck. I love it

Shame they didn't do dual lands like it too

AYYY! That's so cool! Go for it and good luck!

@@RedBobcatGames I'll try my damn best. Thanks again!!

No worries, and thank you for your upcoming vids! I wish you all the luck!

Haha! Really? God, I'm so annoyed at this deck. And I'm the one that made it

@@RedBobcatGames listen, I'm a control player. There is a finite amount of fun to be had in a game of magic and I'm trying to have it all

Fair!

Haha, thank you! I also hate this!

Ah why thank you very much

Do you know how much I had to fight the urge to not reply to this? Every comedic fiber of my being wanted to leave this as the one comment that I don't respond to. But thank you, it's appriciated

Ha! Those rumours that I'm anything more than a Bobcat were unfounded and proven to be untrue. Please don't ask any more questions!

I mean, that would 100% totally be me. I made the deck and I've already forgotten what most of the cards do haha

You are more than welcome

You and everyone else will have a bad time! But okay I guess, have fun?

Well, no. I guess I didn't feel the need. But I did link their Patreon in the videos description

You're... welcome?

Proxies are the way if you're thinking about it

You are more than welcome. Thank you for the comment!

Oh well, thank you very much!

ty ty

Why thank you!

Ha! And thank you!

Thank you, thank you

No no, thank you

You are welcome!

Ty ty

Haha, thank you. And agreed

Glad to oblige!

Good luck. Please don't blame me if your opponents become angry!

Haha, thank you!

Thank you very much!

Thank you. I think it's terrible, but thank you all the same

Oh yeah, no the deck sucks. It's bad in all areas. If you play it everyone will have a miserable time, even you haha

You're more than welcome!

Glad to be of service

Yeah... yeah :(

Haha, oh no! You're welcome?

Ah why thank you very much!

I mean, that's a cool idea though to be fair. See, now I'd be annoyed if they didn't print more cards like this just so you can complete the deck

One day

Errr, thank you?

Ha, this deck does need a name and that's quite a good candidate

I think that's a bad idea, but weirdly I would watch that

Now that's really evil!

Don't tell them I made it! I'll be shunned!

I mean, to be honest I think this entire video was insane

Oh no! Why? Everyone will have a terrible time!

NO!

This deck is crazy expensive. If you want to play it, proxies are the way to go. And then don't play it because it would be awful!

They are beautiful, I will give them that