Best comment award!

It looks like fox is smiling honestly not your typical fox !

It DOES

Imagine a famous artist painting that during the Renaissance and that painting was the reason his career was ruined.

Plot twist, those painting are all photorealistic. The world really looked like that. This fox is one of the few things that didn't visually evolve since then

Literally! He did a lil smirk tho no cap

Fox be like "hmm....yes, quite."

The fox: -_,-

definitely feeling himself 😆

He's literally the Steven Seagal of Foxes

Or it thinks you're lying

And he remains unconvinced we are worthy of sharing them with.

and apparently the secrets of the universe aren't very impressive.

No wonder he looks disappointed

Very true :👍

😂 🦊

Hehe...

Ha ha ha,you sure am right

it looks like chinese....

Mykl Miller

Pump Little nah he just feels like all the other animals don't diserve his presence.

"he's the most wonderful looking fox.."

@@aw4704 km mi dez buscar

@@bobikoart or more like weird head looking fox I seen before honestly!

Rakkasan06 I agree

Hahahhaa thats what I thought

It is 😑

I mean there really cute but *Nah*

Rakkasan06 exactly! I was thinking the same

omg you

Danny Zuko hahahaha so true

@@FreePlayer97 I think they mean the build and the facial structure. Much different than what you would think a fox to be. Marble foxes, red foxes, Arctic foxes and such.

It has the mongolian eyes.....

@@catarinaandersson4215 it an Asian fox

He's unique, isn't he?

Tibetans usually think the brown bear is an evil looking thing, interestingly

འཇིགས་མེད་ རྣམ་རྒྱལ are they insane?

@@Ror0009 These bears have been confirmed to be the legendary Yeti through dna samples and accounts from locals. Not evil IMO, but a definite shit your pants moment if you run into one.

@@Ror0009 Bears occasionally go into Tibetan's camps at night, and steal their food and cattles, so some local people do not like them.

@@user-kp8le4lj8e Ah I see, I just think they look so cute haha Jesus bless

Fox: look at ma face.. Do i look like i have any intent to share?

That fox be like "(¬_¬)"

kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk!

HAHAHA IT’S TRUE YOU DO LOOK LIKE ONE

💀

I uhh...hmm..... idk if that's a good thing.

@@jaymerka5875 oh shutup they’re beautiful animals stop trying to find a way to be negative…. If she’s happy why you ruining it !!???

He ain't superior against the bear.

He's a Lannister

Po Ho ikr he lookz like doge

He looks like an Asian

IKR

yoginc come to my country said again, you will go to hospital

@@hazard1648 I also thought he looks asian.

SadisticSultan It isnt can see the ear moving

Same exact thoughts!!!

SadisticSultan i am the 69 like

Yes! 😂😂😂

I watched this for the fox, and then the bear showed up and I was like *flailing double-take* "Himalaya, who the heck designed your animals?! 0A0 ...Did you get the budget guy? |:>"

😂😂😂

lmao yes

Yea lmaoaoaoa That’s why I came here

YASSSSSDS

渓流釣り

No, the fox is not ungrateful, he knows he wouldn't eat without the bear. And there are tomorrows

Bear: I thought what we had was SPECIAL!!!

You sound insecure.

yeah... i thought its a costume lol

Me too lol, thing looks like a bad taxidermy of a fox haha

he looks like transylvania wolf papa

How does he sound insecure?

+Maks2383 lmao! your face!

Look at your face lmao 😂

Nicolas cage

😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂😭😭😭😭😭😭🤣🤣😂🤣😂

(¬_¬)

I think the mouth should be a bit lower:-)

@@monikaszymanowska5142 - - _

@@momo-chanthegerbil6205 You nailed it:-)

@@monikaszymanowska5142 thanks XD

Lps Swag

Looks high.

The fox is narrating his own life

than anybody i think except a dolphin.

racist thing to say but...... ok

lol

I'm a fox and I find this offensive

+Captain Foxy it's not racist

+Stefan Tristan your not a fox

+Adam Norris It's hip to be a square

That is one handsome girlfriend.

She is not mad at you. She is just disappointed:-) Check up the Tibetan fox meme.

Why? You got money to waste or what? I’d rather get Steve O tatted

@@to.lame.to.function5242 hope you are feeling OK

Ukaknir God: "We like to have fun here."

2:17 me smashing the alarm because how annoying it sounds.

@Tom Reichner, get your taxon rankings right, rodents are an order not a family, they are divided into thirty-eight extant families, twenty-one extant superfamilies, and three suborders, the suborders are Caviomorpha (Cavy-Like Rodents) with the superfamilies Ctenodacyloidea (contains 2 families: Diatomyidae (Laotian Rockrat) and Ctenodactylidae (Gundis)), Petromuroidea (contains 1 family: Petromuridae (Dassie Rat)), Phiomyoidea (contains 1 family: Thryonomyidae (Cane Rats)), Bathyergoidea (contains 1 family: Bathyergidae (Molerats)), Hystricoidea (contains 1 family: Hystricidae (Old World Porcupines)), Octodontoidea (contains 2 families: Octodontidae (Degus and South American Rockrats) and Echimyidae (Spiny Rats)), Chinchilloidea (contains 2 families: Abrocomidae (Chinchilla Rats and Viscacha Rats) and Chinchillidae (Chinchillas and Viscachas)), Erethizontoidea (contains 1 family: Erethizontidae (New World Porcupines)), Myocastoroidea (contains 3 families: Ctenomyidae (Tuco-Tucos), Capromyidae (Hutias), and Myocastoridae (Nutria, Punares, and Guiaras)), and Cavioidea (contains 4 families: Dinomyidae (Pacarana), Caviidae (Cavies), Cuniculidae (Pacas), and Dasyproctidae (Agoutis and Acouchis)), Sciuromorpha (Squirrel-Like Rodents) with the superfamilies Aplodontioidea (contains 1 family: Aplodontiidae (Mountain Beaver)), Gliroidea (contains 1 family: Gliridae (Dormice)), Anomaluroidea (contains 2 families: Zenkerellidae (Cameroon Anomalure) and Anomaluridae (Flying Anomalures)), Pedetoidea (contains 1 family: Pedetidae (Springhares)), Sciuroidea (contains 1 family: Sciuridae (Squirrels)), Castoroidea (contains 1 family: Castoridae (Beavers)), and Geomyoidea (contains 2 families: Geomyidae (Gophers) and Heteromyidae (Pocket Mice, Kangaroo Rats, and Kangaroo Mice)), and Myomorpha (Mouse-Like Rodents) with the superfamilies Platacanthomyoidea (contains 1 family: Platacanthomyidae (Lasiures)), Dipodoidea (contains 2 families: Spalacidae (Kopatels, Zokors, Bamboo Rats, and Grawes) and Dipodidae (Jerboas)), Cricetoidea (contains 4 families: Calomyscidae (Kuyruks), Cricetidae (Hamsters, Lemmings, Muskrats, and Voles), Zapodidae (Jumping Mice and Birch Mice), and Sigmodontidae (New World Mice and Rats)), and Muroidea (contains 4 families: Muridae (Old World Mice and Rats), Gerbillidae (Gerbils, Jirds, Sand Rats, Link Rat, Spiny Mice, Brush-Furred Rats, and Rudd’s Mouse), Cricetomyidae (Cricetomyids), and Nesomyidae (Malagasy Rodents)).

@@indyreno2933 Pikas are not rodents. "Family" can be used both colloquially and taxonomically. I usually use it colloquially.

@Tom Reichner, no, "family" is used only taxonomically, this is more correct, all animal families use the suffix -idae.

@@indyreno2933 I see and hear the word "family" used all the time in non-taxonomical ways. So do you. In fact, it is used far more in colloquial ways than it is in taxonomic ways. I am getting the idea that you just want to be argumentative.

@@indyreno2933 the conversation here has nothing to do with all of the creatures that are rodents. The subject being discussed is the Pika, which is not a rodent. Why you so off topic???

you are right ! probably exactly thinking that. That fox scares me by its cleverness.

Its one of the rarest breed of bears….the tibetan blue bear

Thank you Lucky Charms. What other ish knowledge would you like to share with us?

Jesus Christ He just stated the fact. Why are you talking like an arrogant pos? Fuck off and read some books, dickass.

Lagomorphs which belongs to rodent family?

@@johncarlofernandez2698 Lagomorpha isn't part of Rodentia. Lagomorpha is its own order, Rodentia is another order. Together these two orders form the clade Glires. So lagomorphs and rodents are related, but as two separate branches of the same tree trunk, not as one branch growing out of another branch.

@Emma Norfleet, actually, the Vulpes genus is restricted to only the red foxes, which are now three separate species, the Eurasian Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes), the American Red Fox (Vulpes fulva), and the African Red Fox (Vulpes niloticus), none of the other eleven extant fox species are closely related to red foxes at all, because of this, these eleven fox species do not belong to the Vulpes genus anymore, they are instead relocated to three separate genera, Neocyon for the Tibetan Fox (Neocyon ferrilatus), Alopex for the Corsac Fox (Alopex corsac), the Arctic Fox (Alopex lagopus), the Swift Fox (Alopex velox), and the Kit Fox (Alopex macrotis), and Fennecus for the Bengal Fox (Fennecus bengalensis), the Blanford's Fox (Fennecus cana), the Ruppell's Fox (Fennecus rueppellii), the Fennec Fox (Fennecus zerda), the Pale Fox (Fennecus pallidus), and the Cape Fox (Fennecus chama), these eleven extant fox species now classified within three separate genera of their own are more closely related to both the Bat-Eared Fox (Otocyon megalotis) and the Raccoon Dogs (genus Nyctereutes) than they are to the Red Foxes (genus Vulpes), with the foxes that are in the genus Fennecus being the closest living relatives of the both the bat-eared fox and raccoon dogs, the foxes that are in the genus Alopex being the second closest to the bat-eared fox and raccoon dogs, and the tibetan fox being the third closest, while the red foxes are the most distantly related from all the other groups.

Whoa, so many thumbs-up hahaha

Lol was waiting for this comment

Finally someone says it

@@Modernww2fare that's what I'm here for friend! 👍

Lmao!

LMAOOOOOOOOO

@@naiafitria8857 :"D this was an old ass comment-

@@Orange_03 lol i know

No

You mean Katz.

Yeah katz