A Tile Tantrum

No video

A Tile Tantrum

Рет қаралды 131,013

9 ай бұрын

The plaintiff ordered bathroom and kitchen tiles from the defendant’s store, but they were the wrong color, so she’s suing for a refund. The defendant claims he was with the plaintiff when she confirmed the color, and he told her they were nonrefundable.
27-055

Пікірлер: 279

@Provostialish 9 ай бұрын

The plaintiff’s English isn’t bad AT ALL; she just has a strong accent. It is VERY hard to represent yourself in court in another language, especially one that isn’t your native tongue. I mean, we hear plenty of people across these court shows who ONLY speak English and can’t articulate themselves!

@carriepriegel6477 9 ай бұрын

So true!! Especially per the litigants whose only language is English and they absolutely slaughter it😵‍💫

@The2Coolest2 9 ай бұрын

It isn't bad but that doesn't mean she may have no trouble speaking it. It can be difficult and perhaps frustrating.

@moniquewinbush1527 9 ай бұрын

It also doesn’t help that JM isn’t letting her finish her sentences

@octaviahollywood635 9 ай бұрын

@@moniquewinbush1527literally finishing every word for the plantiff

@JayseGreene 6 ай бұрын

Polish

@bunji_beans 9 ай бұрын

I briefly worked for a stone tile distributor in sales and something I quickly learned was that different places had different names for the same stone. Not only that, natural stone can be very inconsistent by its nature. You have to be really careful and take the time to get current samples, but even then there can be complications. Imo it's more trouble than it's worth.

@Jenny_5309 9 ай бұрын

Just went looking for someone saying this as I did. If that natural stone is not mind from the exact area, it can vary in color a lot. My husband has been laying tile over 25 years now And he always recommends that they purchase All the tile at once, because if you go back due to a crack or issue, you may not get the same coloration/pattern aka dye lot.

@carriepriegel6477 9 ай бұрын

His body language screamed deception- he ordered the wrong tile and couldn’t own HIS error. Document EVERYTHING in bigger purchases especially where home renovations are concerned

@bossbabehabits1202 9 ай бұрын

I’m glad the plaintiff won because I can see how she reallyyyy tried to get her point across with her English not being great. The fact is she knew the name of the tile she wanted, the defendant placed the incorrect one on the invoice which she quickly noticed and went back the following day to point out and she still didn’t get the right one.

@riggamorrischan 9 ай бұрын

I love her accent, can anyone place it? Not sure if it’s eastern or southern european?

@JamJamxo 9 ай бұрын

@@riggamorrischanI’m pretty sure it’s Russian

@lizhart1526 9 ай бұрын

I think is Polish

@Provostialish 9 ай бұрын

@@riggamorrischanHer last name is Polish.

@al5945 9 ай бұрын

For heaven's sakes, CAN WE PLEASE NOT post spoilers?! 🙄🙄🤦🤦

@anthonyperez6906 9 ай бұрын

Judge is right !!! Restocking fee is ridiculous maybe 50 dollars but 350 he is crazy

@essflem 9 ай бұрын

The defendant's argument was that the plantiff wanted one tile, but went with the another because of the significant price difference. He also said that it was ordered online and everyone agreed that tile is cheaper online. What got him was that there was no price difference between the two online (where he ordered it). He lied. I really believe that woman went to the store to point out the name difference on the receipt, but the defendant didn't think there was a difference or ordered whatever he could get her by Friday.

@annereidy7981 9 ай бұрын

yes, that and the plaintiff's witness, he put up a good case for her.

@scooneil 9 ай бұрын

One of them could have been on sale at the time and not on sale at the time of the case. The judge may have been looking at wholesale pricing rather than small-batch pricing. Any number of things may have impacted that. Bottom line is that neither litigant brought any evidence about it one way or the other, and the judge's quick Google search shouldn't outweigh the only bit of evidence entered by an actual litigant (the receipt which clearly listed the tile that was ordered). Judge got this one wrong.

@elvickRULES 9 ай бұрын

Lol. Do you shop online because there is not a universal constant price of items online.

@BREEZYM6015 9 ай бұрын

I'm surprised she won. She should have gotten a partial refund at best. If there's no proof of what the plaintiff ordered then how can she prove that they ordered the wrong color?

@valmunguia5761 9 ай бұрын

Seems to me that there’s sufficient proof that they ordered the wrong one. She knew the name of the tile she wanted, and she came back the next day because the name on the receipt was wrong. They both agree on those facts.

@kellyannr4171 9 ай бұрын

@ @BREEZYM6015…..conversely, the tile company can’t disprove her statements either. The tile shop needed to put the correct name and sku on the receipt. The onus is more on them than the client in my opinion. They are the ones who have store policy and should therefore be responsible for making everything clear.

@scooneil 9 ай бұрын

@@valmunguia5761 No they don't. He said that she came back the next day to take another look at the discount tile. Not only are the stories different, but they both have an air of believability (ie: buyer's remorse on her part and questioning whether she should have gone with the better tile). There's no real reason why he would choose to sell her a cheaper tile if she wanted a more expensive version.

@kimmccormack9905 9 ай бұрын

@scooneil she came back because the name was wrong, client took advantage of her lack of understanding knowing it was the same tile in a different colour so tried to convince her it was the same hoping she wouldn't make a fuss. When he came he thought he could claim she chose a different one as it would be cheaper - except the judge found that it's NOT cheaper. That gave her props to doubt that she ever wanted that colour and that he made a mistake and ordered the wrong tile. The tile shop guy tried to play the judge by saying it was a cheaper item.

@scooneil 9 ай бұрын

@@kimmccormack9905 I get it. You believed her completely and discounted everything he said. But when two sides have two very different stories and the only evidence is the receipt? You have to legally rule based on the evidence. The judge Googling for a few minutes isn't evidence (and doesn't actually prove anything. One of the tiles could have been on sale then or now. She could be looking at a different product. The tile might be at the end of a product cycle now, etc). Ultimately, the price difference is irrelevant, as her receipt had the name of the product that she ordered. She has no evidence that the return visit was about correcting the receipt (and the fact that the receipt WASN'T corrected looks bad on her story). I have no idea which side is telling the truth (and frankly, nobody else does either). Either she had buyer's remorse or he tried to pull a fast one on her. One of the two is clearly not telling the truth and both stories are pretty plausible. In that kind of case, you have to go by the evidence, and the only evidence is the receipt.

@scooneil 9 ай бұрын

Judge Milian for literal decades: "GET A RECEIPT BECAUSE THEY ARE ALL THAT MATTER IN COURT!" Judge Milian in this case: "The receipt says one thing, but you have a heavy accent so all contracts are null and void for some reason."

@MindSetReset 9 ай бұрын

😄🤫

@BeKind2AllKinds 9 ай бұрын

No meeting of the minds. That matters.

@davidswick8571 9 ай бұрын

Where she made her ruling was right at the end when the defendant even stated that the plaintiff did not really know what she wanted.

@scooneil 9 ай бұрын

@@davidswick8571 Do you have a time stamp for the comment you are talking about? I went back and re-watched the last 5 minutes or so of the case, and he didn't say anything like that. Was it earlier?

@osmaknn9778 9 ай бұрын

Yea 80% of the time judge says “write a receipt on a piece of tissue, and then we people do a one she enforces it, i don’t think he should have been held 100% liable for this, questionable decision

@ImmortalKingJay 9 ай бұрын

Preponderance of evidence; is it more likely than not. She doesn't need rock-solid, unequivocal proof. The judge uses her discretion on a case by case basis.

@mamathemeat 9 ай бұрын

Yeah the contract had the wrong tile

@osmaknn9778 9 ай бұрын

@@ImmortalKingJay lmaooooo

@osmaknn9778 9 ай бұрын

@@mamathemeat she went back the next day, and still let him order it?

@mrshappilymarried1 9 ай бұрын

" I tell her to say yes or no b/c she goes into too much detail " ** proceeds to look away***😂😂😂😂😂

@scooneil 9 ай бұрын

He had one story. She had another story. He didn't have a price sheet to back up the price difference he was talking about. She not only didn't have a sample or even a picture of the tile she supposedly ordered, but in court she couldn't even say with certainty whether the tile brought in by the defendant was the one she wanted or not. The two stories were very different and neither side had any evidence. There was just one piece of evidence in the case--a receipt that backed up the defendant's story. The judge got this one wrong.

@SmilingSynic 9 ай бұрын

Best part of THIS case was Harvey's advice at the end.

@stephanied8388 9 ай бұрын

The color is called giallo antico (pronounced like jiallo not glario) and it means antique yellow, so I'm not surprised it was too yellow.

@KonstantinaVlahos 9 ай бұрын

Her English is excellent- funny how people think a strong accent equals bad English.

@Fiery.Dragon 9 ай бұрын

I'm surprised the plaintiff won, tiles can be a bit picky with shade and tone, and look different under different light - natural light, or in the store, and the name on the receipt didn't match -- but I am very happy the plaintiff won, it is clear that plaintiff did not receive the product that she believed she was buying, and the resolution is good.

@user-hs1zr6mc5d 4 ай бұрын

I believe her. He such a lousy liar that he just assumed he would win. I knew he was a liar when he couldn't even produce a way to show the price differences. He had plenty of time to even make up a list to help his testimony and he still arrogant enough to think he would still get over.

@angelslive9651 9 ай бұрын

Bravo to the Plaintiff 😂 so happy she Won - the defendant looks 💯 shady 🤨

@nubopgritty634 9 ай бұрын

Her witness explained it and won the case.

@cherieprender1030 9 ай бұрын

Thanks for letting me know before I even watched the video... 😒

@essflem 9 ай бұрын

@@cherieprender1030 Why would you check the comments before watching the video and then get mad at spoilers. Make it make sense.

@Bebedollie 9 ай бұрын

@essflem lots of people scroll through the comments while watching or before watching. There are always buzz killers in the comments lol

@mamathemeat 9 ай бұрын

@@cherieprender1030wow so crazy how ppl don’t take responsibility for themselves… don’t read the comments next time…. Ppl aren’t gonna stop making comments for you or should we send a mass email so everyone can know it bothers you?

@mamathemeat 9 ай бұрын

@@Bebedolliethen they should stop doing that….

@tmilesffl 7 ай бұрын

She is the type of person who will never be happy. I feel sorry for her contractor as I bet she gave them a hard time as well. Dealt with too many of her type.

@ESBEAUTII 9 ай бұрын

It’s the fact that was showed the one she wanted and she said that wasn’t it then when he showed what he actually brought her, she went back and said the first one was PROBABLY the one.. 😂

@supplepaws 9 ай бұрын

I believe her, altho it was subtle there was indication that she was telling the truth. The big thing was the defendant trying to inflate his motive, for her buying fantazio. If he said they were the same price, it would become really clear that he made a mistake, but the difference in price was a subtle lil change to his motive, making it look like she wanted something cheaper. But once you realize its the same price and that she DID in fact come in again to verify the tile, to which he had no real response, its clear he probably didn't have the one she wanted in stock (or available ordering) and got her a similar tile just so he could get an easy sale.

@elvickRULES 9 ай бұрын

If they were the same price it wouldn’t change anything, because someone can buy one color item and then rethink that once they have it and go “that’s not what I ordered”. “But she went in the day after!” Which could also be her rethinking the color choice she picked and trying to back out 🤪

@supplepaws 9 ай бұрын

No two reasons why this might be unlikely. For one, she claimed she went back in with her witness, moments after leaving with the receipt and reading it. This could be a lie, but the judge asked him, did she come back and he confirmed it. This means she went back for a reason. And 2nd, imported tile, you gotta know that just cause they can order something doesn't mean its always in stock. If you go to a home dec shop and try to get extravagant expensive tile or materials sometimes they're out of stock, but the salesman makes commission on sold material. He would have a motive to try and get a sale by ordering a similar tile to the one she wanted hoping she wouldn't notice it. She asked for one, he wanted to make a sale and most likely hoped she wouldn't notice if he picked out a really similar one, rather than tell her its out of stock when her mind was so set on the one she wanted.

@tommyjones6866 9 ай бұрын

This is the first time I've been genuinely shocked by a JM judgement. This is essentially just a he said/she said. The only hard evidence is the receipt, which said she got what she ordered and there were no refunds. I can't believe JM ruled in her favor.

@ashleyquam 8 ай бұрын

I think it was the fact that the lady saw the wrong name and went right back

@tchevrier 9 ай бұрын

a couple of points. 1) you can't tell colour from a computer picture. 2) the colour and pattern of granite is so variable that it makes no sense to be that picky about it. Even the same style from the same slab can vary. What that means is that even if you have a showroom sample, there's a good chance that what you receive is not going to look exactly the same. 3)granite stains so its going to change colour anyways.

@nightsky3981 9 ай бұрын

She shouldn't have won. This lady doesn't know what she wants! She is all over the place.

@SweetTarts151 9 ай бұрын

He was lying. He said the one she couldn’t afford was $12. The judge finds the tile for $7-$8. So it wasn’t more expensive than the one she didn’t want

@JayTheDodo 5 ай бұрын

Or prices change over time. From the time of purchase to the time of the case who knows what could have happened to supply and demand. The judge didn't check the price of the cheaper tile only the more expensive one, the cheaper one could have been $5 at this time.

@LeolaGlamour 9 ай бұрын

I believe her and the reason why is because she came back the next day.

@feliciagallo9832 9 ай бұрын

Giallo Antico is pronounced phonetically: "Jol-lo Anti-ko" and it's Italian for Antique Yellow

@shellwilliams6306 9 ай бұрын

Thank God for the plaintiffs witness

@Skeezer66 9 ай бұрын

I could never be a good judge. I hear the plaintiff talk and I agree with everything she says! Haha!

@Birdman-ed5xr 9 ай бұрын

BS judgement!!! The signed receipt say’s specially what she wanted and paid for and the fact she came back twice??? He would have gotten more money upgrading her tile… BS judgement

@puddincup9879 9 ай бұрын

I believe there is as a misunderstanding on both sides. Fair judgment!

@scotthewitt258 9 ай бұрын

I'm not even sure on this one. I would think enforcing the "restocking fee" would be based on her changing her mind and cancelling the order, not on the wrong tile being ordered. Correct verdict, I think. Hard to agree there was a meeting of the minds when there was a communication barrier because English is not her primary language.

@DM-uz7lf 9 ай бұрын

The plantiff ahould have lost, the minute the man said shes a single mother can you cut her a break tells me they're cheapskates and tried to get a way better deal than they should have for that tile.

@user-ot4nr6vk7e Ай бұрын

JUDGE, she said, MANY TIMES, that NAME of the tiles she received was NOT what she ordered 😮 STOP INTERRUPTING 😮😮😮

@cinnamoninit6028 8 ай бұрын

Usually the judge loses her mind when someone mentions a party being a female. Since it worked in her favor she let it slide? I disagree on this one. She's a big kid. She can figure out how to communicate.

@tatattaylor 9 ай бұрын

Wow....I'm surprised she won.

@trekgirl65 9 ай бұрын

Why surprised, she got her point across. Some men love to think they are smarter in the business world.

@tashiaredd3421 9 ай бұрын

11:48 the plaintiffs witness lied! He definitely told her to say no! It’s clear as day!! You never hear him say… say yes or no. He clearly says say no

@augustmoon9973 9 ай бұрын

That was the right ruling, in my opinion, because if anything, he can still sell that product and profit, while she would have to either settle for that tile or buy again. By the way, his restocking fee is a ridiculous amount!

@perfectlyimperfect9129 9 ай бұрын

If she can't afford the one she wants, then I don't see how she has a case at all. He got her the closest to what she wanted for what she Wanted to pay. And she even stated that she's not even sure. So yeah i'm really shocked how she got all her money back.

@cyndedawson3129 9 ай бұрын

I agree with the judge give the lady her be 💰 money!!!!!!

@ooooiooosamo8751 9 ай бұрын

This was hard to follow because Judge Moolian kept interupting the lady and talked faster than Dan Matthews on Highway Patrol.

@44812348123 4 ай бұрын

He probably tried to sell her the different tile because he makes more profit from it.

@msfranklin2650 9 ай бұрын

HONESTLY I BELIEVED THE PLAINTIFF & AS THE JUDGE POINTED OUT THERE'S SEVERAL DIFFERENT COLORS W/ THE NAME SAME PRICE BASICALLY / 30% DIFFERENCE. THAT WAS THE REASON SHE WENT BK TO CK. THE DEFENDANT POOR BUSINESS PRACTICES HE SHOULD'VE MADE SURE IT WAS THE CORRECT TILE SHE SAID SOMETHING IMMEDIATELY $$$$ HUNGRY 🤬🤬. GOOD CALL JUDGE NOW REFUND THIS WOMAN HER $$$$

@BeKind2AllKinds 9 ай бұрын

I don’t like how rude JM was to the plaintiff’s witness and impatient with the plaintiff. Not nice.

@mountendew 9 ай бұрын

Horrible judgment! She was too picky and changed her mind

@Absaalookemensch 9 ай бұрын

Excellent idea to buy a tile sample and have the name and item # written on the back.

@Logicalreign-bm2mj 9 ай бұрын

Her Witness has a very old school NY accent

@trekgirl65 9 ай бұрын

The defendant did not want to refund what he should have for the wrong color tile, his mistake. Glad the Plaintiff won. He was wrong for not having learn customer service skills. He was taking advantage of the lady with the language barrier so he could keep the money no matter what, which is a bad business practice.

@meadow8787 9 ай бұрын

Lmoa I had to rewatch her huff after his explanation 3 tines 😂😂 love her.

@mirsan6705 9 ай бұрын

Have a fantastic week pc family 💪🏻🫶🏻💗

@zuritribe4844 9 ай бұрын

U TOO!

@mirsan6705 9 ай бұрын

@@zuritribe4844 thank you^_^

@SahranHoliday 8 ай бұрын

Always get a sample and keep it.

@diwilliams7183 9 ай бұрын

She won because of her witness lol she bout to go half with him 😂

@wrightwilliams105 6 ай бұрын

I think the defendant either ordered the wrong tiles or he deliberately ordered less expensive tiles to make a bigger profit 😊

@christibarrick1768 9 ай бұрын

I can’t hardly stand to listen to that plaintiff. Omg.

@Jenny_5309 9 ай бұрын

Problem with natural stone is you have to purchase all from same dye lot or it won’t match.

@christopherbako 9 ай бұрын

"I dont trink vine" Dracula

@tmilesffl 7 ай бұрын

Natural stone will come in different shades due to it's natural state. There would be no guarantee of shade when ordering so you really need to buy what you see. I prefer natural stone and understand there may be some shade differences if I have to order it.

@donteporchia1744 9 ай бұрын

The People's Court

@rationalbushcraft 9 ай бұрын

Hahaha she looks "so happy." I'm sure she is a nice person but it is just funny to me that people from Russia or the old soviet bloc countries never look happy.

@mikieanthony777 9 ай бұрын

What a bizarre comment 🤦‍♂️

@TopherGrant 9 ай бұрын

There's no reason to be happy. It is considered VERY rude to smile and make eye contact with someone in public in Russia

@steelwheels327 9 ай бұрын

This lady doesn't seem to sure of anything.

@hankrhill324 9 ай бұрын

My headphones are dying… I really hope I get through this episode 😂

@Catloudan 9 ай бұрын

so because her English is terrible, she should get what she wants???? Great logic there.

@davidarmillie4226 9 ай бұрын

I agree, there was no agreement.

@leisurefarm 9 ай бұрын

omg, going by her incomprehensible words, accent and stammering, it could well have been a case of miscommunication. The defendant really should have done a better job of confirming what she wanted.

@they-live1 9 ай бұрын

Has she been in the country for only several months. Maybe thats why her dropped the ball in ordering basic tile

@kcblues4855 9 ай бұрын

Restocking fee is standard.

@user-sh4mv3tc3r 9 ай бұрын

I don't think the plaintiff made a good case. She was inconsistent at the very least.

@cindykaufinger1642 9 ай бұрын

What? If there is a language barrier then the contract can be cancelled without consequences??? You can't be serious? That's nuts! You need to be held accountable and she should have been held accountable. She should have brought her friend with her on Day 1! That judgement was not right. So, can I just buy a house and after 2 years change my mind and day "oh, language barrier".

@VonDonald 9 ай бұрын

Kinda odd she didn’t address the stocking fee with the defendant before making the ruling

@oldageisdumb 9 ай бұрын

I don’t agree with the ruling. The only evidence was a receipt saying what tile was ordered and it was not the tile she said.

@kristhemermaid3169 9 ай бұрын

I love her but it doesn't matter what language she speaks. Don't go into contract if you don't understand it

@Dove.Love. 9 ай бұрын

I know what I say is rude, but all the shuddering is driving me nuts.

@cureeway 9 ай бұрын

Ya, I truly believe her

@tuxedonix2884 9 ай бұрын

Floor stores!!!! I ordered tile, had someone come out qnd measure, i talked to thexguycwho measured qndxthe sales person about one propblwm i thought they might have. I pointed out to the guy who measured. Twice to the salesman. It came, they went to install, nope . Wouldnt work. Theyvtried really hard to give me crap and charge me restocking fee. Even though i was still ordering from them. I didntv ust chwnge my mind.

@user-cz5ny3tn9t 2 ай бұрын

I can't stand when they have such a heavy accent and they start to stutter

@drock8316 9 ай бұрын

HAPPY MONDAY PC FIRTS!

@sarahrean7174 9 ай бұрын

WAIT WHAT ?? her receipt say another thing ! perhaps i miss something ! english it's not my first language too but she should have lost!

@shaleenacampbell931 9 ай бұрын

😂 laughing at her witness continuously pointing out her bad English

@user-fr5hs4vj4d 9 ай бұрын

Judge got this one wrong and she did it on purpose because she felt bad for the plaintiff. The only evidence is the receipt which shows she got what she paid for.

@jennylynx1869 9 ай бұрын

She should have lost

@BREEZYM6015 9 ай бұрын

Nice picture you have there.

@trekgirl65 9 ай бұрын

Nope, for she was to be a satisfied customer and the defendant just wanted to keep the money and be rid of a immigrant customer.

@mamathemeat 9 ай бұрын

Clearly she shouldn’t have because she won

@VladmirPoopN 9 ай бұрын

She had a witness with her, his story was the proof.

@jennylynx1869 9 ай бұрын

@@BREEZYM6015 thanks, I put a lot of time and effort into choosing it. A KZfaq profile picture is pretty important so I wanted to take it seriously

@serenityfranklin7943 9 ай бұрын

i thought the plaintiff was taryn manning at first 🤣

@Modern_Homegirl 9 ай бұрын

Really lady?

@fuckyzeit 9 ай бұрын

Her English was fine. But I'm glad she won yay

@screwthisin 9 ай бұрын

They just couldn't get over the accent. It's pretty thick though.

@onasamaya1 9 ай бұрын

Thats weird that she won.

@somebodywatchin 9 ай бұрын

She got very lucky!

@crystalshaw8744 9 ай бұрын

I forgot I switched Judges, I'm like what's wrong with Judge Judy's voice...smile

@em42355 9 ай бұрын

When the defendant and plaintiff stare it out for a minute.

@lajames4079 9 ай бұрын

I honestly believe her

@arnoldalvarado9191 9 ай бұрын

I don't always agree with the judge😮😮

@Evveffentide 9 ай бұрын

Gooooood SHMORRRNING!!!

@iamroxx7595 9 ай бұрын

yous both seem like nice people but woman power judge millian is so predictable

@batmang9014 9 ай бұрын

Plaintiff is a biznatch

@alexrossi4464 9 ай бұрын

I'd hire him to clean my pipes, anytime!❤❤❤❤

@TopherGrant 9 ай бұрын

Gross. You pay for sex?

@snowboy82 9 ай бұрын

So she gets a refund because she has an accent? Really, so whenever I want an order and I have buyers remorse, all I have to do is make sure I order it with an accent. She understood what she was buying. She's cheap, and then she wants another $600 off? Even the guy that was with her said, "Give her the money cause she's old and has an accent." SMH! I usually agree with the judge, but not on this one. She gets a pass when the rest of us mear mortals have to abide by the contracts we sign.

@jeanicelewis510 9 ай бұрын

Get a Sample!!

@Musicfan-dz6yz 9 ай бұрын

This was such a boring case 🥴

@trekgirl65 9 ай бұрын

No you were a boring case, WAKE UP!!!!

@richardmayora1289 9 ай бұрын

Always buy a sample of the tile. Always.

@Saphthings 9 ай бұрын

It’s pretty clear what happened. - She said I want tile Fab A. - He said that costs X. - She said I can’t afford X. - He said well I can do tile Fab B for Y. - She said oh, like this one? - He said yeah yeah. It’s a Fab tile. She’s not understanding that it’s a whole different one. And he’s thinking they’re like the same thing and she probably understands. I can’t say for sure he was malicious, but he probably just saw her as a simple old lady and didn’t think she would be as picky. So he wants to keep 1/2 the cost of the item because he’s probably like “oh… I guess she really wasn’t understanding me..” and then he can sell it for half off or 25% off and make a profit. They’re not more expensive than the other. It’s just he only stocks the one he marks up higher and the other he can order online for a tinier profit. Probably just thought, “eh whatever I can order this stuff I don’t stock online for her and just charge her a bit more” but whether intentionally or not she wasn’t understanding.

@assetprotection5389 9 ай бұрын

She’s a liar she realized at the end she didn’t like the color and changed her mine bad call judge

@stephaniehowe0973 9 ай бұрын

He TOLD HER it was. Custom ordered item. You always take a sample because phones & computers have blue light messing up what it truly may look like in person