Snakes caught in their own trap. Maybe someone with disabilities should sue them for discrimination.

That dude was a clown. They knew they were busted as frauds.

@foot bru Actually, not saying anything is the smart move... if only she could wipe that vacuous smile off her face.

The smug, smirking Face of Evil, right there.

I wouldn't be surprised if Jennifer and Alex were "friends." I seriously doubt if Alex is or was a legal assistant.

That comment made my day 🤣

Well played my friend

😂❤️🤡

Al Bundy would have warned her.

LMAO

Surprise surprise

In the name of god, I'll take that check. Thank you.

Any minister is a scammer.

the longest running organized crime racket is the church (all of them)

He's Fred Phelps all over again...

Profiting off of others’ suffering

Agreed, had they sent a warning first that they're going to sue unless they fix it up first it would have been a completely different story. Then they'd actually try to better the community without the witch hunt, and not go after businesses money for at least trying to keep it up to par. Going after them for the money alone without a warning first seems to me as abuse.

Bingo.

I really don't like that bull with the van signs. Grocery store in town had a bunch of van only signs put up on all of the handicap spots because of a law change limiting space marked like that to only vans. Now there are a lot of people who can no longer use handicap spaces and some of them really need it despite not having a van. Like my grandfather has his motorized wheelchair on the back of his truck and now he can't use the handicapped spaces.

Incorrect. Most individuals like myself who are disabled do put complaints in and never see any change. Most complaints about accessibility are because of fat able bodied people taking our parking spots or there are legit spots throughout the city that aren’t accessible. Side note: there are individuals in my community that have jobs specifically to help people with disabilities to get around in lifer with less complications so we can have a somewhat normal life. Before speaking your opinion make sure your opinion has been thoroughly thought out.

Then what’s the problem with warning first like the other guy said before you sue. Didn’t you see the whole story? The group that was suing other companies wasn’t even in compliance themselves. If that’s not the definition of “calling the kettle black” then I don’t know what is. If your going to advocate for people with disabilities, you better make sure you are the SHINING LIGHT of disability compliance. Do you agree?

"self-proclaimed" lol

Well, not every minister can be a televangelist. He has to make money somehow!

There surely are some bad reporters, politicians, doctors, lawyers and ministers, etc, .... but most are trying to do good

Ex-military ex-cops ex-wife there are often a lot of reasons why they're no longer in that line of work

No surprise most of the so called men of god are full of it up to there ears it’s all about money !

It’s part of The Trump Effect.

Sadly, this is what happens when democrat policy and democrat messaging is allowed to run rampant within their radical population without repercussions.

@@TheRealCrimdor This happened five years ago while trump was president. Please keep in mind that your no content KZfaq channel is just spouting crap that you’ve been told to think. You have no original thought you brain is controlled by one of the two political parties that Americans are allowed to have. And rather than suppress one groups message why don’t you present a message that isn’t just whacked out right wing BS. And just in case you are wondering… Yes, everyone here thinks you’re ignorant.

@@wcolby - it’s amazing how you wrote that out for me, but didn’t have anything similar to say to the guy that said, “it’s part of the Trump Effect.” It’s almost as if you’re hypocritical and quite partisan yourself.

@@TheRealCrimdor I acknowledge your observation I’m not even sure what the Trump affect is, although I am legally Republican I am a firm believer that Trump is an idiot. But I will not respond to every stupid comment on KZfaq, I pick and choose. Please don’t forget to like and subscribe.

Agreed. I’m in software and companies don’t care about ADA until they get sued.

The point of ADA is compliance. Anything that is not aimed at compliance is undermining it.

@@TheSiriusEnigma Really? A sign being half an inch too low or high undermines the ADA? You must work for AID.

@@JohnJ469 if a sign is 1” too low… you just move it up. By 2”. This is what is supposed to happens. Not this legal circus.

@@TheSiriusEnigma Sorry. I misunderstood your comment. I thought it was in favour of the circus. I've seen a couple of these articles and the lawyers are claiming that *not* suing "undermines the ADA" because it's the only way to enforce compliance. Essentially that places won't comply without being punished. Again, my apologies.

As long as they getting paid they going to keep it up Stuff like that is not likely to happen in States like Florida and Texas but more likely in States like California and New York which is a little surprising that it took place in Arizona

This comment didn't age well.

@@randominternetuser2888 he had way to much faith in people 😂🤷‍♂️

Like the cops that threaten people to cooperate or they'll be arrested?

Jedi Knight would you guys like to leave?

That tub of of lard crushed her shoe. I know a good farrier, that would provide more appropriate hoof-wear.

Like cops that lie or break the law to enforce the law? What's worse?

@@krane15 Cops have guns and the authority to use them. You really are a smoothbrain.

Alex certainly has a quick wit. He was able to come up with a decent comeback for Dave. Said no one ever!

*ludicrous

@@GarrettWorcester hahahaha thank you! I was thinking..."does ludacris have a disability? When did that happen?!"...lol

I'd wager it's a 90/10 split in favor of personal profit and that's being generous!

That guy said it they get zero money because he is sueing and not the handicapt people.

The ministry is not a game

@@TruckTaxiMoveIt no it's not it's a scam

@@TruckTaxiMoveIt but it is make believe

Not sure about that. Nothing is more profitable than shilling for god!

@@TruckTaxiMoveIt Selling an invisible product seems pretty gamey to me.

Basically all democrats then.

Like cops and code enforcers when they write citations? Are they making the roads and cities safer or just collecting revenue for all the cronies in your government to spend? Do you know where that money goes?

🐑Rebellious angels were thrown out of heaven and with no money down , man built them temples and wrote thousands of Bibles.

This is a legal scam, so if they got sued its not likely for the legal end of the scam. The fed law itself needs to change

Good. If they don't have accessibility, they deserve to be sued.

I watched that story too, from California. So glad that the little mom and pops sued them back! It was ridiculous and just downright shameful!

@@boofert.washington2499 Did you miss the part that it isn't about accessibility?

You must be that disbarred "lawyer" posting under an alias. Surely, nobody over the age of 6 can be that stupid other than him.

YES

Ah, cancel culture.

absolutely!

@@evajung666 No, it's capitalism.

@@evajung666 ah lame trolling

Wonder why?

lol that was awesome.

And she's on camera driving while using a cell phone! HAHAHA!

I fucking lost it at that part. I like how the dude is probably like... YEAH SEND THE FAT CHICK TO FILM THEM.. not the girl i stand next too inside LOLOLLOLOL

just a nice little gentle fat shaming to put that chick in her place.

its not the ADA its the state laws which allow for monetary damage awards. ADA only awards attorney fees by default, making it not lucrative for any plaintiff unless it's a plaintiff-lawyer who brought the action.

Also disabled and agree that this stinks. These people getting sued are putting those spaces in and should not be sued for small errors that may have been made. This makes anti-ada people happy as eventually many states will refuse to comply as they have a reasonable fear they will be sued either way.

What. Peeves me as a disabled person is the lack of HC spaces. There should be more spaces than the standard average required

100% agree. I am handicapped, but I am more able than most. So it really burns me when I don’t use available handicapped spot so someone else more disabled can use it, only to have someone who clearly doesn’t need it park there anyway. Actually had a women tell me that it was my fault. I was using up the good spots allocated for people like her, so she’s just making things right.

@@brenturquhart7090 That sounds like you found an entitled KAREN

@el bandido jefe exactly. I sometimes even park at the far end of the parking lot just for the walk. I have a cane and it may take awhile but even handicapped people need exercise sometimes. I have my good and bad days so I don’t use the closer spaces often. But it still pisses me off when I see someone use those spot but don’t need it. I just don’t understand why they feel it’s was ok.

Seriously. You're the spokeswoman for the branch and you just smile and look to the dbag lawyer

He wasn't even a lawyer. He's a legal assistant.

Whatever that is

Praise Jesus! Now the handicap can get pink eye!

Hey even the ADA enabled may need to get a lap dance. But wait, if you are visually impared, and you can't touch a dancer does that violate the ADA law?

@@williamjones7163 Food for thought. 😎

That's because DoJ is sitting on its hands by the looks of it.

Obama era

Do you know what your city does with all the money and property it collect from crime? Which effect you most?

@@krane15 They spend it on "special projects"

Revenge is a dish ,best served cold and Karma will prevail

This happened in the Napa Valley about 20 years ago. They focussed on the older wineries without modern facilities. It cost them millions.

Yup. Many companies don’t care about ADA until they get sued. Sucks on both sides

I like how the fucking "spokesperson" of the branch said like one word the whole time lol

No it's not

Um no. Extortion is to threaten financially, with nude photos, locked computer malware, etc. A lawsuit implies you have already broken the law and the plaintiff must resort to the court for redress. A lawsuit is a very expensive procedure, for me to be compensated for my loss and since "you" were at fault and refused to compensate until I had the court PROVE your fault, those costs are your burden. It is reasonable and prudent for the plaintiff to offer to settle. Finally, look at circumstances. In nearly every case, litigants pay the much lower costs to come into compliance, than the cost to settle. AID itself can't bring itself into compliance, cannot bear to be scrutinized publicly without hurling MAGA like insults at the local media outlet, cannot pay their field agents enough for adequate clothing and surveillance. AID is barely staying afloat.

Like when the DA offers a plea bargain to lesser charges? Even when you're innocent of the charges? What do you call that?

@@krane15 we will proceed carefully, because this can get confusing. Right now, you are confusing "civil law," with "criminal law." Many of the rules above still apply, right down to being reasonable and prudent. I will elaborate. Ok "lesser charges," is not an attempt to win a lawsuit, without going to court. Criminal law, is advocacy driven, meaning the state automatically _assumes_ guilt. This is a big mistake people make about police, it is why they say, never talk to police without representation, because police are charged with gathering evidence to support a prosecution. When the state offers lesser charges, it is a signal that the defendant has won. It says, "the state believes, in its heart, that you are guilty, but prosecution of that charge does not serve the taxpayers interest." Therefore, the state offers a "compromise," that only fools - and railroaded people, take.

@@aardque look up the definition of extortion and blackmail

@@eyesofstatic9641 except both extortion and blackmail are illegal, so you'd want to define the practice around that legal loophole, oops!

I know-- I think her breathing was labored

+erinkayemusic she should have just rolled cuz she's a ball

You also realize that given the heat in Arizona, walking on pavement could prompt some burns? She could have very well been exhausted. It could have also been a step towards preventing injury to herself.

I really feel like she was the cringiest part of it all. I'm not surprised to see people money hungry and just putting up a facade. Doesn't make it any less vile. But with this fucking ridiculous "Health At Every Size" bullshit going on, having moments like these recorded and shown is all the material needed to bring down that "movement". It's just morbidly obese women wanting everything a healthy woman has without having to put in any effort. All her make up and grossly restricting clothing desperately trying to squeeze in an inch or two can't hide the fact that being unable to walk across a parking lot simply cause you eat too much is just gross

Zyzzus Christ that was too funny.... Land whale lmao

I believe that the designed weight limit was exceeded.

She needs my sister to just give her a proper hoof job. She is a really good farrier!

As if those rats do it for free 😹

When you get a traffic citation does that money go to charity?

I've been disabled my whole life and I was just about to leave a comment like yours, so I appreciate that. I use a chair and getting around a lot of public places is not fun! The thing that bothers me more than that is that people like this are taking something that is meant to give the average disabled person a voice to speak up about the lack of accessibility and they are profiting off of it. You know what's going to happen? They're going to take the voice away from disabled people are there going to make it harder for us to Use it. These people, the ones that are actually doing something wrong we'll get away scot-free.

I noticed you didn't say you required a wheelchair to move around. Not very disabled if you ask me.

@@boofert.washington2499 yeah the sign 1" too low sure screwed that wheelchair guy.......... It's disgusting as ambulance chasers..... -___- Did they request changes first? Or sue, sue, sue. Like assholes

here: ?v=DRCBoVvjtNE

If you're disabled get an attorney with slightly more scruples than theirs and then have them file an ADA compliance lawsuit against this group for not being handicapped compliant.

I got dizzy trying to see that

Grounds?

@@TruckTaxiMoveIt did you watch the report THEY themselves are in violation of the very stuff THEY go around claiming violations at the same time the violations their claiming are designed to ASSIST the the handicapped but when they go right to lawsuit it is harming everyone, not sitting down and ADRESSING the violation

These lawsuits have put businesses out of business.

Cory Wilson lol elephant

I hope that the whale got beached!

Turturro twowpqrrkthemostpartof is party

Good stay there

Congrats I hope you got a nice little dopamine boost writing that comment sir

HK is right. We have a pay for innocence judicial system that is insufficient and insulting to our Democracy. instead if getting butt hurt over another person's opinion of our country's broken legal system, do something about it or at least educate yourself. "Hot Coffee" on Netflix, so there you don't even need to go a library. Ignorance is the cancer of society.

Daniel Pleasant You must have shit reading comprehension. I never disagreed with him in the slightest. In fact, I agree with him completely and I'd much rather live in Norway than the USA.

+Lawlyewmad hope you got your dopamine boost. Please go curse at other commenters to keep up the buzz!

They are crooked and entitled

Such as the feds making laws that restrict free and individual right? They do it every day. What effects you more?

@@krane15 I guess you missed the point. That's ok.

@@carlosspeicywiener7018 If that's your position, then it would appear that we're both guilty. Although, I did ask a question.

@@krane15 Over restrictive rules are not atrocities.

I don't think a seat belt would fit around her.