Great job Judge Blanco! An important problem and a well thought out solution. Congratulations.

Your the best Judge Blanco 💪🏼❤️

You rock Judge

Actually volume is very low in this video

While we are addressing courts to determine the competency of defendants, should we also address the competency of judges? 6/6/24 TO: JUDGE DEA LINDSEY CC: BCBA Judge Lindsey, As you are aware your two short court orders provide no reference to the law or evidence. Given that would you mind: a) Appearing in a hearing to review your orders with expert witness from BCBA/IAALS/JEAB? b) As one simple step, review my RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISMISS attached and itemize any aspect of it you disagree with regarding the evidence, the law, and your duty as a judge. c) I am including some prior questions I had filed that you declined to answer. Do you care to offer any answers now? d) Did you receive any instruction from Ingrid Bakke to dismiss my case?

DOES ANYONE AT IAALS, CBA, BCBA AGREE WITH MELISSA HART? HART: 'Law school and IAALS is pivotal in shaping values; professional norms and attitudes, standards of ethics, develop professional responsibility, urgent need and professional obligation to devote time and resources and civic influence to ensure equal civic access to justice.' If so, what professional responsibility for ethics and time, resource, and civic influence are you willing to commit? Just curious also, note that Dea Lindsey determined that my understanding of the law and ability to articulate a logical argument is so deficient that she approved defendant request to remove my constitutional right to represent myself. Does anyone agree with Dea Lindsey?

LEGAL REASONING PLAYOFF BETWEEN NON-LAWYER AND COLORADO COURT OF APPEALS JUDGE; ME VS. STEPHANIE DUNN As you note below and attached, COA judge Stephanie Dunn shares her feelings that the magistrate wasn't dishonest, and I present and analyze the evidence that the magistrate was dishonest. STEPHANIE DUNN SHARES HER FEELINGS: Father's contention that the magistrate made false or misleading statements is not supported by the record. ME LISTING AND ANALYZING FACTS: Brodsky stated, 'Let me assure you I am not overturning the order.' The order by the district judge was that child support would not be based upon actual overnights but would be based upon equal overnights irrespective of the actual overnights. This unusual order was designed to compensate for an accidental 75-25 split of assets by the district judge. Therefore, Brodsky statement is false. Whether Brodsky knew her statement was false, i.e. she lied, or she simply didn't understand the implications of her order cannot be determined from the record. Three questions emerge: 1. Isn't there a class in law school that teaches how to argue with facts, evidence, and the law rather than your feelings? 2. With my legal reasoning skills superior to a COA judge, how disturbing and ridiculous of irony is it for district judge Dea Lindsey, basically following the flawed reasoning of Brodsky, to determine I am unqualified to present an argument to a judge without hiring a lawyer? 3. I have challenged various judges and officials including Dunn and Brodsky to debate these issues in a candid forum; they have all refused. What possibly are they afraid of; decades of education and experience in the practice of law, vs. me, a lab worker who has never taken a class in the practice of law? It's like an NFL team being reluctant accepting a challenge from a high school football team.

So, it is already undisputed by COA judge Terry Fox and others that my legal fact and law based reasoning and analytical skills are superior to the 'here are my feelings' orders by Stephanie Dunn, David Stark, and Chris Gregory. Now let's see what Fox on the Judicial Ethics Advisory Board and Susan Blanco will comment on the professionalism of my opinion to the opinion of chief judge Ingrid Bakke. Stay tuned: Judge Fox, as a member of the Judicial Ethics Advisory Board, would you mind reviewing the Admin order by Ingrid Bakke, compared to my suggested edit? From my perspective the Bakke directive is effectively a direct disagreement with all relevant case law in CRCP 12, the access to justice opinion of ABA, IAALS, CATJC, and CRS 13-5.7-101 and CRS 13-5.5-101. In short, my suggested edit is far more professional and inspiring of public confidence and shows a much clearer understanding of all relevant law regarding dismissal of civil complaints. Am I wrong? Glad to hear your analysis. INGRID BAKKE, EXISTING: 'CIVIL COURT TRIALS ARE AT THE DISCRETION OF THE JUDGE'. MY SUGGESTED EDIT: 'DECISIONS REGARDING REQUEST FOR CIVIL TRIAL OR PRELIMINARY HEARING WILL COMPLY WITH ESTABLISHED PRECEDENT; FACTS MOST FAVORABLE TO PLAINTIFF UNDER ANY THEORY OF LAW MUST MOVE FORWARD. THIS IS SUPPORTED BY THE ABA MODEL RULES FOR ACCESS TO JUSTICE AND CRS 13-5.7-101. ALL COURT ORDERS MUST COMPLY WITH ALL JUDICIAL PERFORMANCE CRITERIA IN CRS 13.5.5-107. PRELIMINARY HEARINGS ARE ENCOURAGED TO DETERMINE THE LEGAL SUFFICIENCY OF THE COMPLAINT AND CLAIMS IN THE MOTION TO DISMISS'. Obviously 'at the discretion of the judge' ignores all relevant law on the issue and paves the way for orders that meet the standard of 'because I said so', e.g. the orders by Dea Lindsey.

TO; ELISA OVERALL, DIRECTOR COLORADO ACCESS TO JUSTICE COMMISSION, As you are aware, any member of the CATJC could directly advocate for access to justice in any access to justice filing currently before the courts; among other things this right is guaranteed by the 1st amendment of the US Constitution. The only replies I have from your commissioners is from Richard Murray and David Stark, and both their statements were either inaccurate, or misrepresented the law, the evidence, and the mission of your commission. My question therefor is simple: Can you send a memo to all your commissioners, including local commissioners, to see if any commissioner is willing to advocate for access to justice; to actually express an opinion or encouragement to a judge to comply with your own mission as supported by the ABA and CRS 13-5.7-101. If you wouldn't mind copying me on the memo, and whatever responses you may get.

Voice is nor clear

700 views in 7 hours you fell off😭