Yep, the power generation is ridiculously different! (but that's a different lesson!)

Glad it was helpful!

I don't have one is why. :)

Figured you’d have access to one. Full disclosure I believe your technique has merit.

Hmm, one could argue there are other buffers out there that will accomplish the same thing without having to replace the buffer tube and spring thus locking it to one weapon and requiring smithing. The LARB comes to mind.

I was just about to order one of these this morning. Was looking at them before I watched the video

I will work on that.

@@ASPextra You da best John!

Unless they're using bifocals.

@@ASPextra Check the SST eyewear, I think they're called, up in Moses Lake, Wash. They put whatever power change you need low on the lens like bifocals or high in the lens, for shooters vultured down on the gun and looking through the top of the lens.

Inconceivable!

Have fun storming the castle! 👋

Our pleasure!

Yep!

He's the one who first really got me to look at shooting as a martial art.

@@ASPextra body structure makes a big difference

I can do it in reverse and the same thing happens.

@@ASPextra That sounds pretty convincing. I'm planning on trying the stance either way, it looks like it'll be markedly better.

Haha!

Won’t work.

For those with short necks maybe but even then, they’ll still probably need a taller mount. Pretty much anything over lower 1/3 and even then you’ll still have to put the gun higher on your shoulder. The exact combination or lack there of is dependent on a person’s exact body however.

How do you know they did not all just get tested and all came back negative? How do you know they don't all have a mask in their pocket, and the instant they walk out of their controlled environment (an environment which probably has an excellent air ventilation system designed to pull air out of the room to control powder smoke) they put them on? You're seeing just one part of their lives, and know nothing about the rest of it.

@@ThatDeltaBravo Let's break this down point by point. A.1) That is not the most likely scenario, but I'll grant you that it's not impossible. However, do you genuinely believe it's likely that they all individually tested, communicated the results of the tests to each other, and then decided it was safe to film the video? I think the simpler and much more likely explanation is the opposite, but neither of us can make a definitive claim here so it's a somewhat moot point. A.2) Even if they had been tested and decided to film based on those results, rapid testing is highly inaccurate and by no means a reason to shrug off additional safety precaution because a test came back negative on any given day. Rapid tests come back positive when a person is at the peak of their viral load, and are far less accurate both before and after that peak.

@@ThatDeltaBravo B.1) If they all had a mask in their pocket, why not wear one while filming in such a close indoor environment? A mask, like a seatbelt, only works when one is using it, not when it's just sitting there. B.2) Again, I'll grant you that the range likely does have good ventilation. As to the particle specificity and flow rate both of us would be speculating so it's not that useful. Either way the metaconceptual point that is lost here is that safety precautions are not mutually exclusive and are instead inherently combinatorial. Do you wear a seatbelt? Then why use blinkers? Why have airbags? Why have ABS? Automobile safety and pandemic precautions are different beasts, but both rely on having multiple features that together improve safety.

C.1) You are correct, this is a short snippet of their lives on camera, however that really has little bearing on the concerns I raised. COVID can be spread from brief interactions (www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/69/wr/mm6943e1.htm?s_cid=mm6943e1_w) especially indoors and when people are not wearing masks. If one or multiple of these individuals is asymptomatic, all of them could now be infected due to the fact that they are all talking, touching, and breathing in a small (albeit ventilated) concrete box. C.2) Ultimately this boils down to a question of cognitive dissonance regarding safety and the value of human lives. I've been following ASP for a while now and have definitely gotten some valuable insights. Everything I've seen on the channel has emphasized that we need to be learning these skills to protect ourselves and those around us. This is fundamentally opposite to not wearing a mask around those we know and care about. That behavior puts the people closest to us in harm's way, not to mention literally every other person they come into contact with could also get infected, and that person's loved ones could get it and so on ad infinitum.

C.3) I ask you Delta and the community as a whole, what is the value of a human life? Given everything I've heard on this channel, it sounds like everyone here would be willing to go to extreme lengths to protect one. So why are you unwilling to do a small thing for the same reasons?