Add Kurt Russell and Tom Selleck to that list. Awesome guys!

Ted Nugget as well. Though he's not really a Hollywood guy.

L. Wolf, you mean Ted Nugent. Misspelling, but right idea.

One of Hollywood's great celebrities and today there aren't many except for those listed on the comments below

Of course they don't.

Any forms of gun control is nuts start in holly wood take all guns out of movies any form of violence let's see how many movies are made let's see how many actors lose jobs how many movie studios survive Only money money money

There are many actors with common sense we just don't get to hear form them.

@Tim Most actors believe the average person doesn't deserve and shouldn't have firearms, but it's ok for them to have private security details. Hollywood is a sess pool of leftist garbage.

Amen - had the pleasure of meeting him at a Wounded Warrior event once. Hell of a nice down-to-Earth guy.

Most live in the la la land they build around themselves

@@AP02112 yes most of them are, but there are quite a few that are pro 2A and libertarian

Great actor with a great message

Not a Hollywood mouth anymore they hate him cause of this sorta thing its totally ridiculous I think hes a truly amazing man

You said it, man.

Considering automatic weapons manufactured after the year 1986 are banned in the US, he technically is correct in that regard and NFA items are banned in some states if I'm not mistaken. The NFA does make some rather ludicrous restrictions, especially on suppressors.

Laws do not take any action, much less prevent the actions of others. Laws are statements of the boundaries between legal and illegal behaviors, and they sometimes provide for a framework of punishment for crossing those boundaries which judges use as guidelines for declaring specific punishments in specific cases, based on the facts of each case. That's why we make laws, why we preserve them, and how we use them. Laws are a society's expression of the degree of freedom their citizens enjoy (or don't). We have very good laws here, on the whole, but of course they could be better.

They don’t care about your safety; they want control over every aspect of your life.

Let me explain this to you ....... its because ......... Hmmmmm ........ you see .......... the thing is ......... Damm YOUR RIGHT !!!!!!

If the politicians would bring back the death sentence, and actually use it, and prosecute the criminals and not just give them a slap on the wrist, then the criminal elements would think twice before pulling off the crime!

@@michesgqlledobbiln8928 not sure about the death sentence but than again iam Canadian. Most certainly we could use more heavy consequences to those crimes. Justice system is not always right and sometime they make mistakes sadly killing poeple with the death sentence who might be inocent. death sentence might be a solution or may not i don't know.

True hero!

It would be banned from most discussion platforms. It doesn't fit 'the narrative' or agenda.

People that want to take guns away from law abiding citizens know nothing about guns and how do and dont work and have never shot a gun. All they know about guns are what they see in movies.

I think if he ever shot a rifle it would have broke his shoulder.

Like most journalists, politics or hollywood people. The last category being full of hypocrisy, doing movies in wich they use guns to be a good guy and make money and then being anti 2a

Larry is playing "Devils Advocate" here, offering an opposing point of view for Gary to work off. If Gary was anti-guns, Larry would've offered the opposing stance. If Gary was pro-guns, Larry would've taken the anti-guns side to get Gary's perspective out. It's called journalism, it's not difficult to understand or interpret.

@@warrenjensen4670 What's not difficult to understand is Larry King, regardless of his stance, was absolutely uninformed when it came to what types of firearms are readily available for people to purchase. Apparently, in your rush to appear intelligent, that flew right over your pretentious head.

Unfortunately too true. Makes one wonder if so many of them hate guns because they fear they'll be used on them to help control their unethical evil ways.

while I agree with your sentiment...to pretend ONLY the Dems want to exercise control over you is disingenuous. It's just different issues the Republicans feel the need to prohibit. Be wary of both sides.

@@6862ptc I wouldn't necessarily disagree with your sentiment as well. Though I'm unsure of what the specific "different issues" are you refer to. Prohibition is a strong word to me and implies force or coercion of some kind. It seems to me, particularly in this regard, that there is a clear and definitive difference in the two parties methodologies. Democrats (meaning today's) being far more restrictive of certain liberties, including the most fundamental of all - the right (and the means) to think and decide for oneself. Vis-à-vis preceding I'm particularly concerned by the apparent alliance between 'big tech' (social media) and the Democrats. Given the totality of circumstance the preceding is unprecedented in degree and severity. And is something that in effect limits freedom of expression/opinion. And that is something a democracy can not long survive.

​@@emansnasFirst let me say I'm a moderate so I am only describing what I read the Left is saying about the Right. But I'm talking about issues like what a woman chooses to do with her own body. Prohibiting LGBTQ from serving in the military, prohibiting same-sex marriages, prohibiting same-sex adoptions. Support for bigoted business owners who wish to carry out their business - which are public accommodations, to which nondiscrimination laws apply - prohibiting LGBTQ from using these businesses under the guise of Freedom of Religion. It's easy to conclude (as MANY right-wingers have accused of the DEMS), that Republicans also HATE huge groups of AMERICANS. They are anti-separation of church and state, anti-labor/union, anti-public schools, anti-science, anti-campaign finance reform, anti-OSHA, anti-SEC, anti-EPA, anti-Federal Reserve, anti-health care, anti-equal rights and anti-civil rights. All designed to aid and protect Americans. In fact, President Trump appointed folks to run the Dept of Ed., EPA and other Departments that had previously spent their entire careers fighting the very departments they were now to lead. Trump's Republican Party foisted lower taxes with INCREASED Federal spending (craziness right?), pro-financial deregulation back to another financial disaster (like the great recession), pro-monopolies (unless it's in industry's who vote for Democrats like high-tech), not to mention the support of white supremacy groups, pro-fake news "Conspiracy-Party Platform" as policy direction, and finally support for an overt insurrection.

@@6862ptc Mmm, that really is quite a laundry list isn't it. Far be it for me to have the time or inclination to address each individually, but maybe a few observations. Some on the list are obviously exaggerative, others are of high concern to small special interest groups (some 'entity' please help us if those in that category - on EITHER side - ever become dominant forces), others less about prohibition than balance (a suicide pact with idealism is ultimately in no one's interest). Clearly fundamental human rights should be maintained, but also the interests of society. Specifically on abortion, it's an extremely complex issue isn't it. One that not only involves emotionality, morals, high and low ethics, and the fundamental needs of a species, but also everyday real world practicalities. Pretty sure that the longest dissertation by some of the smartest people on the planet attempting to be completely rational and objective would be wholly inadequate in resolving the issue. It seems like it should be too obvious to have to state, but the form of government we're under was 'born' under the guidance of those who honestly, with the highest ideals, tried extremely hard (at risk of life) to construct a nation based on certain principles (we should all know what those are). What has happened under those principles is arguably the most powerful, freest, most prosperous nation to ever see the face of planet Earth. A nation that has defeated other nations of great evil who attempted to prevail, and held at bay others that would similarly threaten our way of life. Clearly it became (or is) evident to 'them' that the nation cannot be defeated from without. From within however is an entirely different matter.

...and to feed.

They're illegal if made after 1986. Civilians cannot own newly manufactured automatic weapons after that date without Class 03 SOT and 07 FFL.

@@TM_Stone correct. But you can still own “machine guns” manufactured before 1986.

@@csutcliff that's why I said AFTER 1986. Your statement is still incorrect.

@@TM_Stone I agree with you. However, my original statement was to refute the statement in the video that machines guns are illegal in the U.S. They are not. You can still own one (made before 1986), under the NFA. They’re just expensive as Hell!

LOL

Lmfao!

He and his linage understand this story to well....He is a snake! Hello!!!????

Larry King is an American television and radio host, whose work has been recognized with ... His parents were Orthodox Jews. King was edjewcated at Lafayette High School, a public high school in the New York City borough of Brooklyn...In your zombie faces!

Daniel Lee king sold his sorry soul for a piece of gold. anybody who honors a turd should smoke it

I love how people argue against that point by saying "Call the police."... You mean "a good guy with a gun"?

The bad guy not having the gun in the first place.

@@victorcoleman949 Not only that but as many have said, when seconds count cops are minutes away. The chances of a cop saving you in time are slim, plus they aren't required to help even if they do get there in time.

@@JohnDoe-ki6dv Good luck with that. They'll get it regardless, you cannot stop it.

@@thesynergy2 works in my country. The penalties for having a gun that is unlicensed are severe. Might be different in the US though as they are so numerous that it would be tough to control.

I was surprised actors like Matt Damon and Liam nesson were for gun control especially when they make movies like Bourne and taken lol hypocrites

Vince Vaughn

If you got out of the guilded cage you created for yourself you'd learn (gun control) is a right wing scare tactic to keep you in line. Dems/ the left do not care about good people owning guns. The problem is too many bad people are in possession of the weaponry.

@@Refresh2b 1. It's 'gilded', as in, gold plated 2. Politicians like Beto have categorically stated they were in favor of gun confiscation

@@Mike-gt1cs misrepresenting the facts and falsifying the truth. People from all across the spectrum enjoy themselves some firearms. Have you seen any John Wick movies? I'm sure Keanu Reeves isn't for gun confiscation. But 400,000,000 firearms are floating around with more guns every day. Responsibility eludes most 2A 'ers.

+cere tomer I think your 2nd amendment implied having the same weaponry available to the public, as the gov't to protect yourself from gov't tyranny...

+DeadringerFRED On the money. We have made, in the "legitimate peneological interest" concessions by way of making "machine guns" unavailable to the citizen, but the original intent of the 2A is closer to what you've stated. Even the SCOTUS has left it "open for interpretation"; They ruled in 1923 that the "operative part" of the 2A was "the Right of the people", thus ending the "militia has the right" argument. It also defined "arms" as "those which are commonly available for a legitimate purpose."

+adirondaker ; ) ツ

+John Kirk Yup...

+cere tomer should've called him a moron when he said Cain killed Abel. Any person with a brain knows that is just a fairy tale story

Right John. More than 22,000 . Many of them are NOT ENFORCED.

+Gene Hollon well said. if all the laws were enforced properly everyone would see that the problem isn't the guns. the problem lies else where.

Your right and thats why Trump said no more gun laws and that he will make sure the other laws are carried out. Statistics and flat out evidence prove that the worst gun control areas have more gun violence and violence period. People that dont want to break the law will obey them but criminals arent and they know where the places are that people wont be armed. Texas has the lowest gun crime yet the loosest gun control.

We already have TOO MANY gun laws. At least we do here in Maryland.

John, I agree, even though Sinise is wrong about a MACHINE GUN. THEY ARE LEGAL. See my post above for BATF regulations of the 1934 Federal Firearms Act.

Legal but HEAVILY regulated, so much so that most gun owners don't even bother with the process

+MrJimmy3459 illegal to manufacture new machine guns for civilian sale.

clubredken And people who think that "all Americans are gun nuts" are not only ignorant, allowing that mindset to dominate their thinking makes them stupid as well. Embracing a state of ignorance is no way to go through life. You can do better. Open your mind and let the light in.

I actually don't believe America feel they have a right to guns because of the 2nd Amendment. They just have been brought up since a young nation to believe they have a right to guns. If any other country had the exact same 2nd Amendment, like Canada, we would interpret it as not allowing the public to have guns. Only the militia. Which was the only military at the time. So America has the gun debates raging constantly. Why is that? Australia banned almost all guns. They don't have any debates or controversy or any problem with guns anymore. AT ALL. Neither does Britain, or us here in Canada. Why does America keep having this problem?

+Max S He borrowed Forrest's braces, as he was no longer using them.

+Max S All right, dammit! You MADE ME LAUGH. I might have even giggled. Now I'm goin' to bed.

+Max S LOL

Magic legs, Lt. Dan!!

Lieutenant Dayne???

Many are, but point well taken.

What is wrong with Ted Nugent? He says the same thing as Sinise just with more flare or flamboyance. Both gentleman are correct. Larry King, like most all liberals conveniently ignore the truth or are just uneducated when it comes to guns and they make silly statements like King did here. Assault weapons are illegal and have been for many years. Why do liberals purposely act stupid on the issue?

Ted Nugent is a neocon warmongering chickenhawk draft dodger that goes around shooting unarmed animals for fun (and food). So, it's hard to accept him as the 2nd amendment poster child. If he is the 2nd amendment's representative, then we're all doomed.

steve fye So if I hear you correctly, you are a bleeding heart liberal who hates the military and the constitution and you try to convince people your comments are relevant by pretending to be pro 2nd amendment? If being a conservative makes you a neocon then most conservatives are "neocons". It's a fact that liberals have declared more war than conservatives. It's a fact Nugent had a student deferment. It's true, animals are unarmed but they are delicious. Many people actually depend on them for food. So it's not Ted Nugent who you should fear, it's people like you.

***** What makes Ted Nugent a racist?

But since none are allowed to be manufactured or imported since 1986, it costs thousands of dollars if you can find one to purchase it. I am sure that will not stop the terrorists from getting them from another country and bringing them here though.

Exactly, no law we put on the books will completely stop anything. All it does is restrict those who do not wish to harm others or those who wish to protect themselves from the evil in this world.

+SpockMcoy Issmart $200 for the stamp. Not legal to own an automatic that was made after 1986. Consequently, they are very expensive.

+monty1300 what personal use do you need a machine gun for?

Dukerbud 88 I know guys who collect all manner of firearms for kicks of shooting, then profit when selling. No different than hotwheels, baseball cards. all items are safe/dangerous in the right/wrong hands. Don't run with that pencil kid, you'll poke your eye out!

+SpockMcoy Issmart Hmmm interesting. I have never heard of mass killings with hot wheels, baseball cards or even pencils for that matter. Because of the risks involved with machine guns wouldn't it be more wise to take up another "collectible" hobby? Just curious.

Dukerbud 88 No.

Automatic death penalty seems to work in Japan were that have next to none murders despite everyone living in arms reach of each other.

+DonJuansDaddy Might i add, on an island, without a smuggling issue, and homogeneous culture. Horrible comparison.

A car can be a weapon and you don't have to own it yourself either, same with a kitchen knife too and stuff for the garden can be changed into a bomb. They can't ban everything people have to choose to be good or bad that is why laws and police are so important so the bad choices in life have hard consequences for the perpetrators.