Same performance, lower temps? That sounds like exactly what I want :D

I've been useing curve optimizer on my 5800X3D for a while now (year 1?) on a Asus Dark Hero. Also tuned the max power draw and lowered that a lot. Since you can't really overclock the 5800X3D, lowering the offset to -30 on all cores, allows the cores to stay at 4.45GHz under almost all workloads. I think Cinebench stabilizes at 4.2 (was like 3.9 with stock settings) during all core, but all other situations, like gaming for me, it just runs at full speed and sips 65-75W. And when you have a custom loop with a 4090, it's nice to have a CPU that doesn't require you to get a second loop for the CPU. Also, everything is more quiet. I also run a power limit on the 4090 for the most part, to get a almost dead silent gaming rig.

This helps only if you use low TDP / Eco on thermally constrained system i.e. miniITX. Since in that case lowering the voltage removes some botleneck points for the CPU to give performance. I have the 5800X3D at 65W working in ~5% performance range from the default 105W in all core, and exactly the same in single core. You would expect 40% lower TDP to have more of a performance hit. And it does without the PBO2 Tuner.

curve optimizer is good to shave off 10-15C and stop air cooler from screaming like a banshee. And it tecnically can give some performance if you're thermally limited

I used -30 all-core on my 5800X3D - CB23 results: before: 14,900 @ 67 degrees after: 15,200 @ 60 degrees. Far more bothered about the temp losses than the MC gains.

Pbo and CO Gave my 5800x +12% across the board with zero instability issues and a drop of about 10c. Call me crazy but seems worth it to me.

i run -20 on my 5800x3d and this does make a difference. with it set to -20 the cpu will hold a boost of 4450 and 4250 at stock. also, i dont know if its my mb, but i can set this in the bios (asus x570 cf7).

Lower temp, consumption and noise at same or slightly better performance is always worth it for me :)

Playing with PPT to find where it performs the same as stock is basically just monitoring how much power it uses for the workload by guessing and typing in the PPT number. Could just open HWiNFO64 without touching PPT and compare CO 0 vs -30.

Did the 5700x3D leapfrog the 5800x3D in cinebench? I can't find a buildzoid video running the 5800x3d in CinebenchR20

The problem is that the 5700X3D has turds for cores that cannot go above 4.15GHz at stock BCLK, so CO just isn't going to do shit. CO on just about any other CPU does work to an extent. On a 7600/7600X/7700X you can get some good single and multi core performance increase. Now, is that performance noticeable in gaming? Mostly no, but sometimes yes. My 7800X3D saw a decent drop in temps and holds higher average frequencies and all I had to do was type -20. Just about every chip out there will do -20 and that has a very big decrease in temps and voltage. Also AM5 does support lower than -30 for CO values, but just about no CPU will be stable.

I think its the X3D cache that is needing the excessive volts, not the cpu cores themsleves.

Hello, do you know why the PBO tuner may not read ppt, tdc, edc limits? They are at zero.

Where do you find oit about these tools? Like for example, did everyone always know about ycruncher? Or is there a big forum post everyone goes to that i dont know about lol

I used PBO2 Tuner for my 5800X3D for quite a while, then MSI released a bios update for my B450 Gaming Pro Carbon AC that updated to AGESA 1.2.0.A which didn't just add KomboStrike but also gave me access to curve optimizer and PBO settings directly in the bios. There is definitely uplift. I'm running -30 across all cores, (edit)122,84,124 for PBO settings, and gave myself a 0.05 voltage offset with an LLC of 7 to help with temps. I post a 15300 in R23. I don't have patience to run single core though.

5800x3d ppl usually just slap -20 on it and call it a day, way lower temps and less spikey fan noise. AND actually hte 5800x3d will happily use the 142 power limit or close to it but I think it just pumps the voltage for no reason. And seems all the limits set on the x3d chips by default are the maximum, so u can only lower them on PBO tuner

I think curve optimizer isn't really that much about performance per se, it's more about having lower temps which means lower noise. Many folks are very strict with noise so in that sense it's a good thing, especially for people like me who just slapped my good old wraith prism onto this thing, works like a charm i must say, no issue at all. Doesn't seem like it's any hotter than my old 3700x. I did notice more stable frequency while gaming when i adjusted the voltage, it stays pegged at 4.05 all cores at all times now, before i adjusted the voltage it fluctuated more between 3.95 - 4.05.

Wait what? I do have access to curve optimizer in the bios on my 5800X3D o_O Are you looking in the right place? There are usually 2 places where you can config CO: AMD Overclocking panel and your motherboard standard panel, in the standard panel you can tune CO, but it is locked in the AMD overclocking.

CO together with PBO took my 5950X from 24K in CBR23 to 29-30K in CBR23 whilst keeping temps under 80 on air. It’s a balancing act - if all the cores are running cooler they can all boost higher but they need the extra power headroom PBO allows.

On air my 5800X3D will thermal throttle in 3s in Cinebench, -30 in the CO makes it takes a while more to happen and the scores goes from 12500ish to 14000ish.

Can you do a BCLK OC+Curve optimizer? There was some thermal throttling with BCLK OC, Curve optimizer can take care of that.

Been running -30 on all cores of my 5800x3d for almost a year. Temps during gaming usually sit around 45-50c with my 360aio. I’m glad I did it too because when I’m playing BG3 in split screen that sucker can get up to 75c in some busy scenes.

No reason not to PBO to -30 each core for 5700X3D, if it's stable in cinebench. Will reduce temp and thus noise and help if you have a bad cooler.

Curve optimizer helps with CPUs that have a higher boost table or higher boost limit, as well as a capped power limit where PBO cannot bypass. For example the Ryzen 5800x on my X570-E Strix motherboard will basically top out at about 160 watts (regardless of cooling), even if you set PBO to a higher setting, and thus PBO leads to a higher all-core clock speed, often you can get a good 50MHz+ additional clock speed compared to just the the PBO settings alone.

Hi guys! My understanding up to this point is, that boost clock is not related to core voltage but temperature. May it clock higher with better cooling? These boost algorithms are a miracle 😅

Please educate me... My setup: ASRock X570 Taichi, 5800X3D. Curve optimizer is available in BIOS...so does this mean it just doesn't apply any settings? I'm confused

Maybe you are using old bios, I have access to curve optimizer on my X570 Elite for my 5800x3d for about a year...? I was using pbo tuner before though....

Asus has added their version of curve optimizer for the X3D chips on the main AI tweaker page instead of the AMD overclocking tab. I tried it with my 5800X3D and it works! A -30 all core curve seems to drop 50-100mv depending on the workload, and random temperature spikes are much lower during normal desktop use. Effective clocks haven't dropped and my cinebench/OCCT score is the exact same. Luckily my chip is good enough to handle the full -30 curve, but it sounds like most 5800X3D's can. Curious if the 5700X3D's lower bin will change the result.

Afaik PBO2 shifts the voltage-to-frequency curve (more from at the bottom, less at the higher to retain as much stability as possible), that shouldn't make the the CPU boost higher in any case, unless it was heavily thermally limited already and the reduction in voltage contributed to overcome that limitation to some degree, regardless, it will only allow it to sustain the same clocks for longer. It's just gonna take a breather basically. There's a setting for it to attempt to clock higher than the rater max boost clock by a certain amount (different motherboards call give it a slightly different name, but it's in the PBO section) but in my experience with my previous CPU, 5800X (which happened to be quite the sample) i had to use a tighter LLC to stabilize it though but it works for more than a year without ANY issues and since it's water cooled it can sustain 4.7GHz at all cores with temps being around the lower 70s iirc and without even caring it will boost up to 6 cores to 4.85GHz for a while if needed. 6/8 cores have set to be at -30, one is 28 and the other one is -26 because that's the 100% stable. I have of course tweaked the PTT, TDC and EDC for some headroom and some economy in between them but it can hold on without them, the tweaking is there more for precautionary reasons partly.

Miss application of the tech . The amount of people running spires or stealths hitting max temps then employing curve optmiser has been a life saver for there boost clocks . You also mention you live in the uk so you are aware of extreme energy costs so its not like every parent wouldn't appreciate a yearly saving here with no performance loss or in some cases a gain? Also you state these OC tools do nothing on a CPU known to be locked down from OC tools especially after burning up those boards on the 7000 3d. The 3D on smaller coolers is surprisingly rough to cool as the vcache acts like a thermal layer . Theres plenty of reasoning why curve optimiser helps allot of people but not guys with large AIOs, then they wonder why there not getting benefits from additional thermal headroom. What next saying a diect to die kit does nothing because its running locked clocks on an already effective AIO ? This would be a weird application of the product also.

either you have a weird motherboard or this is 5700X3D specific but the 5800X3D has curve optimizer in the bios since many months. (i have three and a handful of B550 Boards)

I take it this PBOTuner2 app isn't useable on a520 itx gigabyte or any a520 motherboard. seems weird as it not overclocking?

My 5800x3d went from 4300 all core around 75-80C to 4400-4450 all core at 70-75C (280mm AIO)

Check your temps, i can maintain 4.3-4.4 ghz with a -20 offset in CO. Temps stay around 82c. If your hitting 90c its gonna downclock. These boys run 🔥

You also can't set power limits in PBO2 tuner to higher than what's set in the BIOS

Considering that those CPUs consume 20W at idle because of SOC and interconnects, I'd say 55W vs 66W is pretty good if you subtract the 20W it has to consume anyway to just work.

Curve optimizer will only provide a performance increase if the CPU isn't reaching the max boost clocks due to some other limitation. It helps if you're hitting a power, cooling, or FIT limit. It's a shame AMD doesn't allow increasing the max boost clock on X3D CPUs. Unlike running a static multiplier and voltage, increasing the max boost clock should be completely safe.

What if you combine this with bclk?

I've also noticed overclocking doesn't really do much anymore. I set my 5600X to 4.85 all core, and the difference wasn't noticeable at all. Same with my 3060. +150 on core gives me an ~8% uplift. Going from 50 fps to 54 fps isn't anything to write home about.

Yeah, when you have outrageous cooling already, PBO tuner probably just doesn't make sense when you need that extra voltage for higher clock speed stability. BUT!, because of how AMD put these CPU's together, at least with the 5800X3D as far as I am aware, due to the 90c throttle limit, it becomes harder to keep those peak speeds in hotter and hotter environments. So yes, especially in the case of lesser cooling solutions, the PBO tuner is really nice for dropping those temps to some extent per core, which is overall best for the CPU's construction with the extra cache sitting on top. I have a Dark Rock Pro 4 with two 3000rpm noctua industrials strapped into and onto it. Obviously I have no major issue keeping it cool at stock configurations. BUT! Due to those fans attached, I can cool the unit rather well at lower fan speed; but not quite well enough for the larger workloads. It works, but it will throttle. So essentially what I get is a quieter product that results in mostly the same performance at a slightly better power efficiency than the stock configuration. AND. If I want, I can now use the extra voltage headroom to up the BCLK by about I figure 5-10% eating into that thermal headroom. Main goal is to make it so the PC isn't heard by the microphone without having to do any major filter adjustments in OBS, etc; but still have the same or better performance if possible. Perhaps I should finally just move to liquid cooling, but... I kind of like the reliability of a non-liquid setup. And ultimately, I kind of need to upgrade my paste. I'm currently leaving about 5c of thermal headroom on the table by using some old Noctual H1 paste. I should probably be using thermal grizzly paste, or their solid pads for CPU and GPU respectively. Way better thermal conductivity comparatively on paper, and from the reviews I've seen so far; definitely better than the paste I am using right now anyways. (but I might as well use it all first.)

Very strange, Curve Optimizer definitely shows up when using CPU-Z for testing (I know its not great, but it loads and runs quickly so I have some idea of if I'm going in the right direction) I was applying my CO settings in BIOS, so having to re load cinebench every time would be annoying, I'm not trying that hard. My 5800X3D went from 602 single thread to 620, and from 6100 multi threaded to 6400.

The fact that I knew about PBO2Tuner before BZ did, has made my day😁

so what would be good for b550m ds3h mobo with 5800x3d i wanna undervolt but im a noob

I had a 5800X3D on a asus B550-E and that got a bios update around the launch of am5 that let me set co in the bios.. a combination of -30 co and a power limit of 108w let me increase both single thread and multithread performance by 5%, with 6c lower max load temps

X3d cpu cannot set ppt higher than default, only lower works, also goes for all the other settings as well

I've stopped using curve optimizer on my 7950X3D (thanks as this was causing all my stability issues and you were the one who told me to turn it off) but I did notice that having a low Curve Optimizer setting did help my score on longer tests as my CPU would sit around 79 to 80C instead of hitting 85C after a few mins which would give me a better score overall, for a quick run of Cinebench R23 I didn't see much of a improvement, maybe a few hundred points higher on a 36000 point score.

Can't speak for the 5700X3D but using a PBO per CCX undervolt my 5800X has a stable +300MHz boost in bios to 5.15GHz. 30,30,25,30,25,30,30,29. (6149 in Cinebench @90°C on 185w rated Thermaltake cooler, 4x8GB CL14@3600MHz, mesh case). It outperforms any 5800X3D in MSFS2020 when using above 1440p resolutions and ultra settings (rtx3060).

I'm running a -30 offset and a PPT of 75W on my 7950X3D because absolutely nothing I do with it seems to lose performance (Code compile and gaming. Often at the same time) but it makes my 360mm run much quieter... and I'm rather noise sensitive.

Even my Ivy Bridge EP E5-1650v2 doesn't run this high on core voltages on 4.2Ghz. It maxes at 1.21v

PBO2 tuner is best used when you utilize the CO modifier alongside increasing your PPT/EDC/TDC. You need to let the chip pull more current. The tool also bypasses the annoying EDC bug that nerfs your performance

On my 7800x3d and X670e Hero curve optimizer works the way effective clocks get closer to the core clock. Since I’m running Bclk (synchronized mode) 101.15 for ram fine tuning at 6270MHz (m-die) curve optimizer per core varies-24 to -30 (not fully stable in Cyberpunk though it runs all the stress tests without an issue). Thus I get 5.1GHz all core (core clock monitoring) / 4.98-5.0GHz in R23 and around 4950MHz effective clock in R23. The max score was 19077. On the other hand if I switch to asynchronous mode and set eCLk to 105MHz (5.3GHz all core clock) I cannot apply negative curve optimizer values bc the system turns to pretty unstable. And with CO on Auto I get 5060-5080MHz in R23 core clock monitoring while effective clocks drop to 4890-4900MHz. And R23 runs slower at hypothetical 5.3 than 5.1 with negative curve optimizer. It’s about 18750 score. The question is how it scales in gaming workload when the load isn’t linear. Will try to run CP2077 2K resolution on my 4090 to check it out. Btw negative CO on 7800x3d in my case affects neither temperature nor voltage in Cinebench

imo CO/undervolt won't give much more performance on capped/"bad" bin cores, usefullness is that it reduces temps and wattage.. which is really not needed on a 5700X3D

Pretty unfortunate that it's hard clock limited. I was hoping for a thermal/wattage limit and uv would raise the clock because of less power demand.

i have this chip my self and setting -30 in curve does makes mine to clock to 4050 mhz and reduced throttling a bit i would say its good to do that if ur in extremely hot country and dont have liquid cooling otherwise like he said it mostly worthless to do this unless in special circumtances like mine u can benfit a good amount

Avx is on a slider....at any given sse / core curve is also the avx curve which you can offset via voltage bandguard or ratio bin down 😅. So when you run an avx load you getting stock avx increase 100%value. This might be just Intel feature though. I run mine at 10%...avx is stable at Sse on 11th Gen

On MSI mother boards curve optimizer is available and it works!

Is gigabyte b650 aorus elite ax v2 good motherboard for 220$?

if your cooling is on the edge you might not boost to that max you see and this might help. your cooling is just too good for this to be relevant. then again, this is just relevant for all-core workloads which are not really what X3D will be used for

Try changing your custom Pstate0, though that is also bclk dependent. If the math can be trusted, try 3900 MHz at pstate0 VID at 32 and then run the curve optimizer at -30 across the board again. I think you should be around 4.5GHz boost if there isn’t an issue running bclk that high. If so pstate0 at 4200 and VID 32 with bclk 107 shouldn’t be too high

Idk why you had such bad experience with CO. On my 5700x OC'd with pbo to 4850mhz and has motherboard limits, so it pulls around 130W-140W so it's harder to keep it cool. So curve optimizer -30 all core can keep higher clocks for much longer because of lower voltages and less heat. Without CO i can get up to 100mhz less than with it. And that leads to a few hundred points(maybe more) less in cb23.

It's easy to run 107mhz Bclk with 5800x3d on my Crosshair VI Extreme , which has Clockgen…

I remember my first overclock, i7 920 @4.1ghz

Ryzen 5 5600 Rev. B2 on Gigabyte B450 Aorus Elite, PBO +200, Limit: Motherboard, Curve: -30 -30 -22 -30 -30 -30, Scaller: Auto. Cinebench R23(Realtime) Multi: 12,044 Single: 1535 Stock Multi: 10,877 Stock Single: 1462 Prime95(Blend) 24h Stable! I think it's a good a CPU sample.

yeah its only if you're really limited. Considering modern CPU's/GPU's is just a game of throttling limitations and overclocking is dead (cant run 5Ghz all core on a 5950x even though that is the 1 core firmware speed), the best we can do is reduce the headbutting of the power ceiling, like vega64 cards you can keep the same factory overvolt and try and go for more Mhz... but you stil run into the power limit, which sure if you raise the power limit 20% you can maybe get 5% extra on the core, however if you reduce the factory voltage it stops headbutting the power limit and clocks 5% higher as a result anyway. Modern overclockign software-throttle optimisation software you can reduce the throttling to gain more performance *sometimes* but the clock/power limits are not changable, IIRC AM4 is like 200 watts socket no matter what you do besides maybe going subambient (where a microcode switch gets flipped). No amount of voltage will allow any ambient cooled 5950x to do 5Ghz all core even if temps are okay because of the fun cap. I had a 5600 which at stock had 4.45Ghz 1c turbo and like 4.2Ghz all core With +200 frequency offset that was 4.65Ghz 1core turbo (so 5600x) but like 4.25Ghz all core. But then if you ran -30 CO across the board all 6 cores would just sit at 4.65Ghz which was a decent multicore improvement for now extra power and heat. Tried the same on a 5950x (no frequency offset) and all core R15 went from ~4Ghz to 4.25Ghz, Later combined with some Bclk tuning got to 4441mhz by the end of the run with a dark rock pro 4 air cooler getting over 30K in R23. I'd love to run 4.8Ghz all core (seeing as daily use has shown every core is perfectly fine running at that speed... on their own, the second more cores get used the power leash gets pulled and it goes back into gimp 4.2Ghz mode), this is all we have now. This is word soup because I'm in allot fo back pain.

Yall prob gonna make fun of me but can't u tune it in Ryzen Master with the same result?

The X3D chips are great gaming chips, but the lack of overclocking is a drag, but that cache just can’t handle anything more. You’re right about the bclk on the X3D chips. It just trashes everything. Memory overclocking is a go on the 5800x3d. Not sure about the 5700x3d. I have a 5800x3d with 4x8 3600 Mhz dimms. You’d think the ram throughput wouldn’t be good with 4 sticks, but it gets about 49 gb/sec consistently.

Please do tighter timings with 7200mhz on a msi board. I’d love you for eternity

I now have a video to link to people with unstable UV's, I know they wont watch it but ill feel better. BZ I hope you do a video on UV without changing the power limit one day, people dont understand that + to GPU core at same power limit is the same as UV. They always get confused when a GPU using 200W is still the same temp even with a UV!

It really just lowers temperatures and more stable clocks.

Will this app work on Ryzen 7800x3d ?

Are you OK?

The 142W CPU PPT value seems to be intended for dual CCD CPUs, because they can easily get to 35W - 37W SoC power under load, in case you run quad-rank DDR4 (e.g. 128GB) and connect all available PCIe lanes. The cores usually sit on a combined 105W - 107W then, depending on the AGESA version, since TDP for Ryzen 3000/5000 is only a fantasy number. My 5950Xs also draw 17W - 20W SoC power during idle compared to the ~7W SoC my 5800X draws idle. Before AMD fixed ErP Lot6 with one of the AGESAs last year, the idle power could occasionally even hit 30W SoC on the dual CCD CPUs. *edit: clarification

How does this software works? You gotta open it and dial the numbers every time you turn it on? If so not very convenient but it is a nice to have tool lowering power consumption is a big deal for many ppl.

Not a amd thing but Intel could use the terminal velocity and vf more easily to use like PBO... I'm running a 12700k at 1.43v to 5.1/4.1ghz because i lost patience trying to do the fine tuning... Rams micron fdie 2x32 at 3900mhz cl18-21-21 1.28v

Curve optimiser is about to reduce the voltage of the CPU. Why is it there and not only Core voltage and/or load line calibration? I don't know. All I know is that thanks to this - X3D CPUs users can undervolt their CPUs even though CPU voltage is locked. :D And I am the person who uses PPT limits on my 5800X (NON 3D). With voltages and PBO tweaks I am able to achieve around stock performance with lower power consumption and much lower temps and fans speeds - noise. All those new fancy OC stuff is not to make your overclocking easier or better. It is all to push further the CPU on stock values, to overclock itself and beat competition. No one cares if it draws the amount of energy similar to small village. Do whatever it takes to go even 50Mhz higher! That is why many people nowadays are doing opposite things - undervolting and energy efficiency optimising. In many cases it also leads to better performance.

The x570 godlike has a clock gen if I remember correctly

so I just tried this out at 0 I get 110 score in 7zip, if I set CO to -5 I get 112 if I set CO more aggressively I still get 112 i.e. -20 or -30 so 1.8% improvement... but a 20% power saving on a 5800x3d see my comment on the other 5700x3d video about why people are dumb talking about CO etc.

CO is complicated, if not done right there's just clock streaching and instability, like the 99% of the people posting -30 all core online. My 5700X is able to run +50Mhz with a mixture of -30 to -10 fully stable, more than that cause one core to no boost correctly, maybe is my bios bugged idk, but it's pain.

Didn’t imagine people still using a 5700X3D in 2044

Maybe direct die cooling will help

You're uk based? I could never have guessed based off the accent (I'm new here)

in a perfect world, we should be able to clock this with a 200 mhz difference opposed to a 5800x 3d. let's say between 4300/4350 boost, and eventually all cores. A little frustating, for sure.

Hey Buildzoid. I've heard X570 Crosshair impact supports BCLK overclock in the range of 103-114 BCLK on some BIOS'es. Saw it on Asus and Overclockers forums, do not know if that's true. Do you think it might be the viable x570 option for 5700x 3D BCLK overclock? I remember you had the motherboard 3-4 years ago ... p.s. God bless you people ! Jesus Christ loves you 🙏

pbo is only useful if you tune per core and you won't get much on an x3d cpu (voltage limit), even on an non x3d cpu you're better off using manual oc

-30 is as low as CO can be

This cpu is a mining beast. It pulls 90w while giving as much $ as 3080 gives. It will buy itself out in just 250 days xD

Probably cause you have used AIO 240 boost algorithm PB2 already maxout the speeds without need it use curve optimizer, that's why you don't see any true difference and also Boost Override didnt work , the combine curve optimizer (negative) with Boost override (max 200) give huge performance increase in 5000 series compare with the stock.

Price is a joke tbh for such downclock when u got 5800X3D for almost the same price. Was hoping for some clock gains here but naah, that thing more capped than 7800x3d

please do 8700g video

I use PBO2 for my Ryzen 7 5700X3d since July 2024. I set all cores to -25 and its rock solid playing all my games with Crysis Remastered being one. It reduced my CPU temp by about 8 degrees C. I used Beefy Tech's video to set it up.

On my 5700X I initially just set all to -30, but within a week system crashed at idle. Set the best two cores to -25 instead and it was all good. Eventually came to -28 on a single best core and -30 on the rest, no issues whatsoever.

Not good silicon, don’t blame that on pbo co

It's worst silicon than 5800X3D so I assume it basiclly can't go faster than 4.1

This must be a 3700x3d instead of a 5000x3d

115 ppt on 5800x

In the scool I learned british. You sound very american. Can you remake this video in british?

I run my sons 5800x3d at -30 all cores, solid as a rock never had a crash. Set in the bios on a Asrock B550 phantom gaming.

Very dissappointing that you did all that testing without monitoring temps...

Its not the way to setup pbo, first you have to setup your PPT TDC EDC limit with hwinfo open and ajust them (especially EDC is the more important) put ppt limit at a higher value like 200 for 5600/5700/5800x and 300 for 5900x then with ycrunch or r23 you had to ajust the limit to be 99.9/100% on EDC and not 10 0% everytime on high workload. Put TDC at the same value as EDC When you find a good value you have to ajust the boost , so start with +50 and see if you have the +50 boost on mono core and all core load, then put a higher boost and see again etc etc.. and finally you have to do the curve -5 by -5 and run corecycler defaut settings and see if you have error

Meanwhile my MSI MPG B550 Gaming Plus supports curve optimizer via AMD Overclocking menu. I can only go as low as -30. But that, paired with 95W limit, is enough to keep my 5800X3D below 70°C in Cinebench R20 with a 280mm aio while keeping the allcore boost clocks at 4,3 Gigahurtz and 4,45 GHz in games...