Ton Koopman plays the 1693 Arp Schnitger organ of St. Jacobi, built during 1689 and 1693. Pitch: A495.45 Hz Tuning: Modified meantone temperament
Пікірлер: 25
@advisorC10114 жыл бұрын
He is one of the few that actually know how to make this piece sing sky high.
@arcobow9710 жыл бұрын
I love how this Schnitger organ tuned at A=495Hz makes this piece sound like its in E Major. The temperament makes the Fugue sound very celestial and victorious.
@zvonazgnadbiskupije10944 жыл бұрын
Some masterpieces of music I like or in higher or in lower frequentions.... Maybe it depends on pipe organ. In my parish church they sound like: A=450 Hz(they are built in 1860 by Leonhard Ebner from Marburg an der Drau/Maribor, 17 stops/registers, 1900 pipes, 1 manual and pedal, one of registers for manual can be used even for pedal)
@bigPianist993 жыл бұрын
We always listen to this very Fugue while driving home from skiing in the dark November/December Nights, gets you right in the vibe for Christmas!
@advisorC10112 жыл бұрын
@robertgift, To you it may seem "defective". But these kinds of organs have character that a "perfect" instrument could never have. I'd say the technological limitations of 300 years ago are completely worth enduring if the artistic result can be as high as this.
@robertgift12 жыл бұрын
@advisorC101 T'was a defect then, remains so now. Notes are not meant to be starved for air. Unless the tremulant is activated, they are to be steady and even, not affected by insufficient design.
@disdonc60123 жыл бұрын
Unbelievable... is this really Koopman? So slow? What a wonder. Very nice.
@claudiolarocca1818 Жыл бұрын
Favolosa
@cazzie51112 жыл бұрын
Brilliant! You deserve all the praises I can offer Thank you Ton. CMW.
@georgeleermakers74675 жыл бұрын
& Jhr. Humphrey. Brilliant organspel. Merci.
@jimfowler59305 жыл бұрын
Of course; Koopman + JS Bach...what a superb combination!! Thank you! Natürlich; Koopman und/plus Johann Sebastian Bach.........Ausgezeichnet! Vielan Dank!
@memattia31983 жыл бұрын
And the Arp Schnitger Organ of St. Jacobi ;)
@raulreyes7259 жыл бұрын
Just perfect and great interpretation.
@orgelfan16754 жыл бұрын
Gefällt mir sehr gut, was bei Koopman nicht immer der Fall ist !
@Orgelix2 жыл бұрын
Mir gefallen seine Buxtehude-Einspielungen leider überhaupt nicht. Unübertroffen finde ich aber die Triosonaten (BWV 525-530), die er auch auf der Schnitger-Orgel eingespielt hat.
@andrehvk_5 жыл бұрын
Absolute.
@MrUseur9 жыл бұрын
Brilliant !!!
@advisorC10111 жыл бұрын
Extremely good comment. I agree.
@robertgift12 жыл бұрын
Since organs are not blown by blowing into pipes, why would such a defect be desireable? I have blown organs using a bellows. Even then, the air supply was sufficient. The notes were not starved and unsteady. They should correct this defect but also allow the correction to be turned off for those who want to hear the historic design defect.
@robertgift12 жыл бұрын
No. The organ does not try to imitate instruments. Otherwise there would not be measures-long pedal notes. But when I play, I place "breaths" in musical lines and fugue subjects, just as Helmut Walcha also did. Playing trumpet, I play the rapid and repeated notes steadily, not as though starved. Of course the notes are not perfectly steady, but that is the goal. Fortunately they do not bounce and sound starving for air in time with other notes speaking causing the unsteady wind.
@robertgift12 жыл бұрын
Wonderful! Wish they would fix the unsteady wind defect in this organ.
@robertgift12 жыл бұрын
@advisorC101 Not "artistic benefits" unless one considers these defects "artistic". Perhaps you mean "authentic". I know of organ builders trying to be so authentic thathey reproduce these defects today. As an organist who also tunes organs, I consideer unsteady wind a mistake. We have added auxilliary bellows to absorb and fill in pressure transients to stop the annoying defect. They should be added to all historic organs - withe ability to switch off if historic defects are desired.
@advisorC10114 жыл бұрын
So have I.
@advisorC10112 жыл бұрын
@robertgift, That's not the point I was making. Try looking at the artistic benefits. Organs back then aren't what "organs" today are.