Thanks! I don't understand Portuguese but got some help from Google Translate. The Go problems playlist has videos that don't require much English

Thank You. So far I am enjoying the challenge of understanding the platform and hoping to provide enjoyable videos for Go players throughout the world, so just stay tuned, and the charitable thought suffices.

that is usually played with the 3-4 being a part of Chinese opening, or some similar position on the side, so not a common joseki.

@@MichaelRedmondsGoTV I face it quite a lot with aggressive players. Right after my 3-4 and my opponent will attach.. can't seem to find a joseki for this like you said. I wonder if a 4-3 or a 3-3 is better.

Not always the same order, but I tend to do more editing with the Japanese

Yes AIs seem to like both the star point and the direct 3-3 invasion, so I think we can assume the result is even enough

@@MichaelRedmondsGoTV Thank you very much for your answer. After i wrote the question, i started to think more about it, and honestly should've watched more of your videos before posting it ;). My problem is, i often struggle evaluating if an opponent is too greedy claiming territory on the side or in a corner. And i want to get a feel, a rule of thumb, when i need to act on that, and reduce or invade a potential territory. The usual josekis resulting from a 3-3 invasion seem so appealing to me for that, because they settle an exchange quasi permanently. It feels like a mini game inside the bigger picture, that is settled fairly. One player gets a roughly 3 stone wide territory and the other player a kind of solid wall towards the center (there might be cutting points, but they need further investment to capitalize on them, so i think it's fair to neglect them in a snapshot evaluation). So if one player would surround the whole outside on the 3rd line that would be 192 of 361possible points, which is slightly more than half. So that, if you consider the wall is not completely tight, it totally makes sense that when i am getting solid boarder territory on the 3rd line i gained a little and if i am on the inside, i need a little more potential than just a wall towards the center. In the end securing 3 points of territory (including the stone itself) or potential to do so, with every stone seems a reasonable goal to get ahead, which would be the answer to my question, and after watching more, i could've answered it by myself xD. Nonetheless, thank you so much for your videos, i know i have a long way to go and your videos are helping me so much.

In the SE Go Congress I was talking about a top pro game so I’d say that was more advanced. This video is more a structured lecture and I kept to what I think are the most important variations.

The AIs are still a bit undecided about if black plays an Atari first at the p4 point