That new finish level competes with a $12k car from the 80s. For a half million dollars product, some would be right expecting way better than that.

Not going to lie, that just looks like a city bus interior

At the price of this aircraft is we shouldn’t be seeing primer in between the cracks of the interior. Come on Cessna I love my 1965, but the quality of the newer versions needs to pick up a bit.

I use to rent brand new '97 and '98 Skyhawks back then and those interiors looked far superior. Hard to believe that was almost 30 years ago.

I'd like to see Cessna introduce a split cowl that can be opened for inspection before each flight.

imagine paying 500k for an aircraft and its got an interior put together like a geo metro

I would like to see the non-flight school version of their new interior. This one is making me not feel too bad about the interior of my 1977 210. Also, the black panel is still out for deliberation. Boeing grey would have been a great choice too.

At 3:04 I see the headset jacks / USB ports will preclude placing anything tall in the cupholders. That's a HUGE design oversight.

Not that they will be torqued very high, but I really love when aircraft manufacturers use a fastener that is almost a circle, but not quite. Really helps when they strip out… mostly Diamond I’d rather use torx

These are great videos! thank you for bringing Airventure to us that can't be there

Looks awful. You can make it rugged without it looking like cheap plastic.

Tryng to compete with Cirrus. The white interior is stunning, but would be a massive pain to keep clean. Avgas, oil and stains from use, pens, markers, lipstick, you name it...good thing i dont need to worry about those problems..

It struck me, at 3:04, whether having a water bottle or similar in the cup holder would interfere with the leads coming out from the headset and USB charging ports that are co-located. I wonder whether they’ve done usage and ergonomics testing on those. Similarly the upper eyeball air vents seemed from the quick glimpse to be slightly obscured by the sun visor up front. Maybe not, I guess it could just be camera angles. I have to agree with the majority of folks who comment on the it looking a little utilitarian, perhaps a bit ‘cheap’. I don’t think I’d want to spend 500k as an owner operator to get this interior, though I sense they’re still going to sell well to schools/rental operators; it’s definitely skewed toward that demographic, and if so durability and maintenance are going to be the big draws. Just hope it’s tested for high cycle, low-care use. Interesting to see how they dress up the 182 and up to aim more at the Owner Operator.

I think the word you’re looking for is utilitarian. I would hope there is an upgraded package that has a more refined look and feel along with the ease of maintenance fr the prices you sell those thing off the line.

These Allen head screws look really bad. Also they strip rather easily and protrude too much. A button head with torx would be much better. In black.

Did they get the doors to close properly yet

I think they missed the memo about carbon fiber. For how much these birds cost, it should be dripping with it.. and it actually makes sense for weight savings.

sooo, to compete with cirrus or Diamond you used new screws? and a cupholder? I have to admit, this is brave.

Just flew this aircraft today (I work for a top flight school) its quite nice as the pilot, the screws were a bit off putting but i definitely enjoyed the top cubby to put my iPad in. All twist knobs were quite underwhelming. Feeling very non tactile and with a high risk to get stuck. The color of the interior was great for night flying as it was extremely dark and made adjustment to night conditions easier. The seats were much more comfortable and held an extremely upright position helping to improve my sight picture and comfort while on the controls. The bolts were quite off putting from a pilot perspective but I will talk to maintenance soon and see what they think. The extra USB slots was very nice and I'm already enjoying the thought of using them in cross countries with my students. Overall it is definitely an improved design. I can't say if it is worth it from a consumer perspective (I don't think it is) but from a maintenance perspective I could see the ease of work being quite the addition and overall helping ROI. That is my take on the aircraft and I believe Cessna is trending towards a training/large buyer over the everyday consumer

Looks like the Pontiac Aztek of the sky. Didn’t anyone warn Textron about design by committee?

We did not see much fit and finish detail. I am confused about the allen head screws vs torx or any other new format drives. Am I missing something?

“Modern stitching” That’s rich

It's 2023 and new Cessna piston singles still have a 1953 microphone at the bottom of the center stack. But hey, the seats now have modern contoured stitching.

Textron/Cessna is screwed when the new LSA MOSAiC changes go into effect. Noone needs a $500k 172 when most LSA manufacturers have or will have a better product with more features for less than half the price of a 172.

The interior looks very cheap for a half million bucks. Also why don't you give us a better, cheaper, and faster airplane?

I mean, I know my eyes are a little older, but those panel gaps and hard plastics look pretty much the same as they did in the 80's. The seats look nicer, as they should in a $600k Skyhawk.

I would love to see the old Retro Cessna paint schemes be brought back to the modern fleet..

Chris - Cessna needs new airplanes, not interiors. Anyone can by a 30 year old airplane and do an interior for a LOT less money. Give us something new. FADEC, composite, faster, farther, etc. etc. Please.

A new diamond da40 is half a million dollars like this. Arguably a better trainer that flies well, is cheap to run, and is safer in an incident.

A new interior is always very pleasing to see, but I'm not quite sure how well this aesthetic will age. And a "durable" yet white interior is an oxymoron.

It's about time cessna upgrade their line-up, just look ate cirrus and diamond and you can see the brutal difference...

172 are legendary work horse's very fun too fly and cross country 😊😊

USB ports look too close together. Sometimes the plugs can be a little to wide. Wires from the same look like they run into the drink cup area. Looks very nice.

About time... NICE..AIRPLANE...

Just as well the interior looks good because you certainly cannot see out once you are inside

NICE... if their intent was to capture the economy car interior feel of a mid-1960s VW Beetle. So they designed it for the mechanics and not for the consumer. Brilliant.

You would think that at least the could have used black anodized metal to blend the metal with other black knobs, and matching lighter anodization for lighter panels. Why not use simple slotted 1/4 twist allen panel screw covers to hide the alen screws for ease of cleaning. Also hopefully the overhead light has a red LED option with white light and would be nice to have a separate function for high brightness when on the ground to use in the cockpit. Would be great to have a floor pedal light option and I would assume the USB receptacles would have led. Just thoughts to make a great plane greater.

It's about time Cessna upgraded it's interiors to modern standards. Well done, nicely done!

An improvement of looks as well as an increase of rugged. Adding serviceability really makes this a smart redesign

So did they fix the seat rails and associated AD?

Wow ! It looks amazing... where is the shop based out of ?

So now that you've replaced the insides, replace the outsides, and you'll have a nice plane.

PUtting the plugs (USB and headset jacks) in front of the goblet holders just renders either one of them unusable: can’t use them at the same time because of the rigid input shafts and plastic heads: please check the usability of your design in the back!

To me it just seems revised plastics but things get heavy fast so I suppose they had those constraints.

Is the price point going to come down with this new interior because the hard plastic parts and generic bolts that stick out everywhere have to be cheaper to manufacture/source.

What are “pissed on aircraft”?

What is “modern stitching”? Will it include the cigarette lighter in the center console? Must have at this price point.

Anything on the new Bonanzas?

The seats look nice, but they should be more concerned with building and selling a 172 for less than $100k. If you could do that, I bet the flight schools wouldn't care if the seats were made out of recycled burlap sacks and old bus seats.

One way to deal with inflation.....

I suggest a new committee. Cup holders and usb? Come on….Update the panel.

Very nice

Why not build an airplane that looks like it’s from 2023?

How is textron even staying afloat selling these new for 450k, who’s even buying at that price

That’s like putting new interior on a 1965 car …

This is loooooonng overdue.

Wow, very nice!

Sooo... No rich Corinthian Leather?

Ok, 100K more to the base price then?

That's $500,000.00...for a 172. I'll keep my 1978 N model.

What’s the point

Functional! Whoopee. I'm 80. My first used car had more style. You could make it convenient to service and MAKE IT COOL FOR A LITTLE MONEY. THEY BROUGHT IN MECHANICS. .THEY WANTED A ZIPPER TO OPEN EVERYTHING

A bit reflective and shows grime quickly. Just saying?.

I understand that Cessna has lost all capacity for innovation approximately 50 years ago, but you would think they'd be able to design a decent looking interior, at least for a demo aircraft. Nope.

Nothing but computer screens on the panel? I hate that! Sure, give me some of the latest, greatest technology. BUT I still want my basic, tried and true, RELIABLE dial instruments! I'm not flying at my gaming station in the Family Room at home!!!!!

Unbelievable the lack of innovation in the airframe and power plant. They should be embarrassed with the lack of progress. How can that guy do the video with a straight face?? Seriously, after half a century all they can do is spiff up the interior??

430K for a 172? it better have nice seats. Recaro maybe.

Sorry it looks like a cheap seat. Paying this much for a plane I would expect more. Old seats looked much better in sight and quality

1960s Royalite for $500,000

The plastic on the interior of this $500,000 skyhawk makes it look like a car, not really a fan whatsoever. Seems like it may be the beginning of “they dont make them like they used to” (as far as the interior goes) and not for the better

Its not 500 thousand nice

Cessna cutting corners and trying to cheaply become Cirrus 😂

As terrible as this interior looks - it's not the problem. The problem is that the aircraft from 1970 now costs $500k because it has 2 LED displays installed. That is... well, the problem.

Half a million dollars for an aircraft that looks like a teenager's rendition of a cheap sports car. Why in earth did they have to try to make it look sporty? What exactly is sporty about the Cessna singles?

$432,000.00?

Not a fan! It looks cheap and has like a hint of cyberpunk. It just doesn’t fit with the airplane’s character. It should have modern upgrade like to USB C (not A) and still have a luxury look like cognac brown leather. Idk if it looked more like a porche than that would be an upgrade but this is like a stripped down tesla cybertruck Its just terrible in my opinion. Also white seats for flights schools?? I mean blue jeans alone will f those up.

182nd... see what I did there?

Reminds me of the New Suburban interior - plastic, plastic and fake leather - for half a mil Tex/Cessna should do better - a lot better

🤦🏻‍♂️🤦🏻‍♂️ Cessna team please

This video is hilarious. In Germany we would call it "unfreiwillig komisch" - unintentionally hilarious. At 1:30 I can see right through between the plug panel and the (cheap) sidewall. My parents 1984 VW Passat from my childhood had a better finish. I fly C172s. Our Club has 3 of them, 1997 to 2001 models. I really like cessna. But the way they sell this totally embarassing interior (not to mention the outdated engine) for HALF A MILLION dollars - its beyond belief. I understand why - but this must stop.

That's great but the plane is too expensive for anyone but ATOs.. And even then only the richest of ATOs. Instead fancy seats, how about you make a plane half the price?

I think the seats are nice but the visibility and the plane at large is still an awful tractor. That dash design is a war crime. It's like looking over a fence or in a bunker. Why are you spending a lot of redesign effort on an awful plane? Crush all 172s in front of all employees and look at Risen and Lancair IV-P and do better. I know you tried with the Columbia but you managed to mess that up, made it mediocre and grotesquely expensive. A 4 seater sleek like the Risen, maybe not pressurized, single piece composite fuselage optimized for simple fast construction, maybe a rotax 915 or that new jetA burning piston if they can be talked down to letting you have many for 25k instead of their nonsense 60k. Glide ratio like the Risen, always think actually good engineering, not awful tractor like you are used to and if the price is over 200k you have failed. There is maybe 6k$ worth of quality carbon fiber in such a plane if you do it right so it should not cost 800k. If Garmin isn't willing to lower their prices for the 1990s computers, develop your own with at least 20" screens, all in one unit including "navigation" and radio. Uncluttered synthetic vision display as close to MS flight sim quality as possible, no bs compass rose or speed tape. Get all that stupid clutter off those screens. Powerful electronics and displays are dirt cheap today. Don't indulge Garmin's 50k$ bs. If they don't play ball, replace them. Same goes for the engine producers. One obvious good way to replace them all is to make a 15kg turbofan engine with single piece turbines. Jet can be quite simple and the natural twin engine config, the speed and the lightness are potent competitive parameters. Such a 4 seater plane should weigh no more than 200kg empty. Any more and you are doing it wrong. And Garmin is helping you.

the 172 needs to go away. the plane hasnt changed very much since it was originally launched. the only updates to it is the avionics which they had no hand in developing, but people still want to pay over $500K for a 66 year old design, with all but the same engine offering. It would be like Ford coming out with 2024 Mustang the was the same body as the 1969, slightly different engine but based off the same engine from 1969 with a digital dash and a new interior for 100k.

Nooo, production quality is so bad

Totally out of touch. Half a million for a trainer.

Wow, more ugly plastic in a Cessna for only $700,000; what a bargain

Fit and finish is horrible for a half million dollar aircraft, not impressed at all..

These silly car inspired head rests are only weight. Nobodies head touches them and there are no rear end collisions 😂🎉😢😮😅

This looks terrible.

Looks cheap and penny pinching

2:18 I'm sorry, but this is garabage. How could you be designing something, and do such a bad job making the one prototype. Middle school kids could have done a better job.

at 1:54 the cup holder looks like the cup would interfere with headset and USB plugs. Might just be the angle.