I have found that if I’m defending the faith to the glory of God, “in Spirit and in Truth” the Holy Spirit will aid me in such confrontations with agnostics and atheists but when it becomes just a game of “one up”, I just let it go and walk away for then it’s all out of pride and ego.

If you was being honest and I know you won't be but if you was, you would admit it's easily possible that you are the liar, unless you know for an absolute certainty that someone has ever come back from the dead and I don't mean just died on the operating table I mean dead dead.

whats his name

It’s not about not believing is Yeshua(Jesus). It’s about getting to the truth. You may have missed the whole point.

What the modern Church needs is a New Covenant Revival (Heb. 9:10) in which members of various denominations are willing to re-examine everything they believe and see if it agrees with the Bible, instead of the traditions of men. We need to be like the Bereans. It will be a battle between our flesh and the Holy Spirit. It will not be easy. If you get mad and upset when someone challenges your man-made Bible doctrines, that is your flesh resisting the truth found in God's Word. Nobody can completely understand the Bible unless they understand the relationship between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary. What brings all local churches together into one Body under the blood of Christ? The answer is found below. New Covenant Whole Gospel: Let us now share the Old Testament Gospel found below with the whole world. On the road to Emmaus He said the Old Testament is about Him. He is the very Word of God in John 1:1, 14. Awaken Church to this truth. Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by husband unto them, saith the LORD: Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1 (Gal. 3:16)? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel (John 1:49)? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? What did Paul say about Genesis 12:3 in Galatians 3:8? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart. Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36) We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24. 1Jn 3:22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight. 1Jn 3:23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment. 1Jn 3:24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us. The following verses prove the Holy Spirit is the master teacher for those now in the New Covenant. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Mar 1:8 I indeed have baptized you with water: but he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost. Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. Act 11:16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost. 1Co 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit. 1Jn 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him. Watch the KZfaq videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay.

@@SpotterVideo Sadly, you don't Rightly Divide => and as a result, you give poor spiritual advice.

@@13kimosabi13 I know how to "Rightly Divide" the differences between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai, and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary. How about you? See Hebrews 12:18-24 for the proof.

I've not had nothing spiritual as far as I can feel and notice spirituality. Admittedly I know what I'm doing is lacking something pray for me I know what I must do if it means I die. But for eternal life it's all worth it.

Yes!

A lot of the bible is allegory.

New Christianity . You mean the one that's closing all the churches?

Only a complete sicko worships a deity that drowns millions of babies. It takes a total psycho to do such a thing

My study proved it is all hocus-pocus. Superstition and cognitive bias mess up our brains. St-Doug-of-PineCreek helped me get back on track to reality, and it is a free service on Thursdays.

Do you agree with all the anathemas (curses) for Protestant Christians and even Roman Catholics? Look them up on KZfaq…shocking.

Closest thing to it as far as I am concerned..But I do not affirm the inspiration of the councils

@@GracieDontPlayDat Religion is the ultimate curse. When victims accept religious nonsense, they declare they have given up on thinking.

@@GracieDontPlayDat I believe some Protestant churches teach more truth than others. I also believe that Sola scriptura and Sola fidei is a Major heresy. It is spiritually dangerous to teach such things. God is the judge of all the Protestants who have died up to this point in history. Many Protestants taught these things out of ignorance and did not know better. As for the Protestant souls that knew better but yet went on teaching these heresies on purpose anyway put themselves in a worse position for the afterlife.

Which canonized text do you reference?

And many more left the church.

Agree! We all are vulnerable to that!

Escha is pretending to know what you do not know and a debate you have when everyone is drunk.

What USED to be debated pre-Nicene is if the pastoral epistles were written by Paul. What’s wrong with talking about history? Why does she equivocate it with not believing in the Resurrection? Why do we want to follow Paul and Martin Luther on eating bacon, but not question books of the Bible that preach salvation by works in contrast to the rest of the Bible.

@@GracieDontPlayDat Here’s why we listen to Paul. “I want you to know, brothers and sisters, that the gospel I preached is not of human origin. 12 I did not receive it from any man, nor was I taught it; rather, I received it by revelation from Jesus Christ.” Gal 1:11

All serve but all do not have the same billet.

@@duncescotus2342 Hilton Hotels are good enough, but a stinky stable will serve the purpose.

Please knock out a three-sentence summary.

"Where many words are sin is not wanting." You are mentally ill and/or you have demons. I pray for your deliverance and healing of your mind. "Resist the devil and he will flee from you." You must resist him.

@@duncescotus2342 Embrace your sin, and learn to do it better or avoid it if it causes you and other people pain. If you don't sin enough, your saviour took a rest during the Easter holidays for nothing.

@@VaughanMcCue Avoid sin that causes pain? What sin doesn't?

@@duncescotus2342 Thanks for your interest. Sin is what the people who are not having as much fun as you call your enjoyment. Parachute activities would be one risky activity that the hypothesis of - If at first, you don't succeed try, try again, would be futile. What do you recommend as the sins you enjoy the most would be interesting to hear about.

The resurrection is not a claim, it is a historical fact. You didn't see it, but it is a fact. Faith btw comes from a place of humility, a surrender to God, to the creator and to the order.

So true. That's why I pray until I get and answer.

​@@joeypchajekI suggest that you get yourself a new dictionary, because it must be giving you some very weird definitions of the words "claim" and "fact". Just because something is written in an old book doesn't defacto make it a "fact". That requires evidence and I am as confident as I am that the sun will rise tomorrow, that in respect of the biblical resurrection claim, if you reply, your reply will not contain a single sentence with just a mustard seed's worth of empirical evidence to support the resurrection claim.

​@@joeypchajekYour claim that "the resurrection is a claim, it is a historical fact" is completely false. If you actually believe that, please learn what a claim is and what a fact is, as you do not appear to understand those terms.

@@nonprogrediestregredi1711 I have it on the authority of God's word that it happened. Fact.

@@NSOcarth Have you ever studied the Apocrypha or the other 50 some books rejected by the church authorities? Do you know the real name given to the Messiah at birth? Do you know William Tyndale translated the Latin Bible into English in the 1500's and then was burned at the stake by the Church of England for doing so? Did you know the Christ and his disciples were a practicing Jews? Most people only know what their denomination tells them.

@@NSOcarth Do you even know the language that your Christ spoke?

I think she looks marvelous!!

Blokes get interviewed in just plain t-shirts. The equivalent not alright for a woman? Real life is not perfect hair and make up.

@@lierox9No it's not alright. I demand only perfection. DEMAND IT

You're a prophet.

Only a person who thinks they came from a “rock” billions of years ago would say this. Fairy tales!

​@@saycheese6773Only someone who believes that snakes, donkeys and shrubbery can talk, could be so wilfully ignorant of abiogenesis so as to say that humans came from rocks. I suggest that you give Genesis 2: 7 a read, because dust is nothing more than finely ground rocks.

@@downenout8705 god can speak through his creation if need be. If a god exists, This is more realistic than what atheists claim… faith claims by atheists: 1. Everything coming from nothing 2. Life from non living matter 3. Information from matter 4. Order from Chaos 5. Laws of logic

@@saycheese6773 Wow you have been lapping up a lot of apologetic snake oil. I suggest that you check the ingredients a little more closely in the future. Atheists only have one thing in common and that is a lack of belief in any god or gods. I personally use critical thinking, scepticism and methodological naturalism as the foundation of my epistemology, not the appalling epistemology of Hebrews 11: 1 which allows you to believe that literally anything could be true. 1. There is not a single peer reviewed and published scientific paper on the subject of the origins of our universe that doesn't propose a pre existing "something". It is simply ridiculous to suggest that atheists reject the scientific consensus and instead assert that there was a "nothing". 2. Abiogenesis is a fact, also you seem to have conveniently forgotten that dust isn't alive. 3. I have no clue what "information from matter" is, so I definitely don't claim something that I don't understand. 4. I can do nothing about your ignorance of entropy. Just look around you and can see examples of order arising out of chaos, all it takes is energy, and that comes from the big round thing in the sky. 5. We have laws of logic that you don't accept, how very strange.