This is the only thing I do not like about my Allan bible, or rather, the Oxford Text block used in this Bible.

Thanks!!

Me also. Id rather have imitation liner inside cover than 28gsm . That said i have a 53 and 63 on order. I have a cambridge turquoise. Love the big print but that 28 feels like fly paper. Little water crinkles page. The 36gsm on rl allan tough as sheets of plywood . A comparison between my nkjv 36 gsm and allans. For some reason the rl allan feels sturdier

Personal size Schuyler Bibles are great if you're looking for a small Bible.

Hi Carmen. I have compared them in several videos, but only short comparisons. I think you're looking for more detail than that. I'll try do a detailed comparison soon.

Is the missing italics really common for all Allan Bibles? KJVs that be…

Yes i plan on marking that out with marker. I want to get a pure 1611 bible. To preserve the word of God also

Both are excellent Bibles, but I personally prefer the Concord. I prefer the smaller size. I like the Bold reference System with the reference next to the verses and no callers in the text and that it has italics. However, the Longerprimer has excellent tools and more references. The Longprimer has more bend into the gutter because the block is thicker.

Yes, it is the same.

Do you have a link to the article published by Gail on this subject?

Gail Riplinger is not a reliable source, even if you are KJVO.

@@cmiddleton9872 I didn't say anything about KJV only. I said that I agreed with her that footnotes in the Bible, especially the notes criticizing the text of the KJV are troubling. And I agree with her that heresy begins in a noted Bible. My Bible is text only, no notes, no cross references, no mans opinion. Just me and the Holy Spirit as my teacher.

Whats matter with scripture to interpret scripture. I have schuyler reference 200,00 the rl allan 53 100,000 and cambridge turquoise believe around 70,000. Plus t nelson . And not all have same reference. So all have come in handy. Its the word of God. With that said i want a pure 1611

@@godsfriend4120 God wants to be your teacher. But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. (Jn. 14:26). While I don’t think it’s a bad thing to learn from other Christians, I believe it must be frustrating for God to want to teach you all things but you constantly keep going to footnotes and cross references to try to learn. I truly believe we need one on one time with God in our Bible reading. Imagine reading the Bible, and every verse I personally stop you and say “the parallel passage to this verse is in Deuteronomy 6.” And then again you read and I stop you and say “A better reading to this verse is this” And then you begin to read again and I say “This prophecy will be fulfilled in 1 Thessalonians 4” Now wouldn’t that be frustrating for the reader and the teacher? God is the teacher, he doesn’t need to be constantly interrupted by some man’s input, even if the information is good. And neither does the student need to be interrupted and spoon fed what the Bible means.

That's a tough one. Both have advantages. For the text, I prefer the Canterbury. I like the clean look and I like the glossary. For the Longprimer, I like the topical index. However, I do have access to better tools. Both have a good concordance and maps. If I had to choose just one, I'd grab the Canterbury.

@@BibleBuyingGuide Thank you so much for taken the time to respond. Most channels don’t.

Yes. Thank you!

Interesting! Thanks for the info!

Glad you liked it!

Hi. I've only seen a few vintage editions, but those that I've seen were thicker and less flexible. The tab in the edge-lined editions was not stiff, so the covers stayed all the way open. Some, like the Oxford Long Primer and the Cambridge Concord, didn't have an overhang, so the cover ended at the edge of the paper. The Cambridge Turquoise had a full yapp.

No

No

Yes. The design is the same for all the Longprimers.

Niv is terrible

It's a Longprimer with 38gsm paper (vs this one's 36gsm) and wider margins (except for the inner margin).

@@BibleBuyingGuide I have noticed multiple Publishers that have Sovereign Bibles just didn't know what the word sovereign meant when they were referring to their Bibles thank you

@@randywheeler3914 true. The Longprimer Sovereign is the first one. Thomas Nelson later developed a mid-sized KJV based on the Schuyler Canterbury design and named it Sovereign.

@@BibleBuyingGuide so Sovereign bibles are just a name and don't refer to any special features of a particular Bible?

@@randywheeler3914 that is correct.