I believe Sony needs to focus a little bit more to apsc cameras. I enjoy my ff Sony a7iii but i would love to see some elevated version of a6600. Also i totally agree that the needs of 2023 photographer gravitates towards lightweight ff primes than they can be a jack of all trades between ff and apsc bodies. Great video as always!

Two lenses that really should happen: 28mm f1.8 or 1.4. 100/105mm f1.4 or 1.8. The 28mm would be very popular here in the UK for us wedding photographers. Yes we have the F2 28 but it’s pants and not good enough for paid work. The sigma 28 is the old lens design and far to big. I’m quite surprised that Sony has not filled the gap between the 85 GM and the 135 GM for a fast prime. I own the 135 and often need far more room at weddings than I have to really use the 135 GM. A 1.4 or a 1.8 100/105 portrait lens again would make a killing for wedding photographers. Come on Mark - have a work with Sony 👌

i would love to see a 18mm f1.4gm for nightscapes, and a new and optically better super light 70-300 f5.6 g II to complement the new 20-70 f4 g. also a super compact 500mm f5.6 gm with built in 1.4x converter would be a great addition.😊

It’s very specialized, but I still think there is a place for a high quality shift lens. I used an adapted Canon TS-E 17mm for years as my main architectural lens. Now I use the FE12-24 f2.8 GM ,cropping and stretching it in post, when I need to. I think Sony could make a shift lens, that would optically improved over the aging Canon lenses, much smaller on Sony bodies and use all of the sensor (not relying on cropping or stretching pixels in post).

What Sony is missing is a current photocentric apsc camera, not lenses, unless we are talking lenses normies can purchase.

I sold my sony 85mm gmaster because it was heavy, loud, and very slow to focus. missed a lot of shots because it could not find a focus. I have been waiting for 85mm Mark 2 for 2 years. I also want a M2 100-400mm GM lens to work with the teleconverters. I want the lighter lens and faster focus.

what is missing in today's sony series is an APSC camera with a shape that allows a satisfying and fast user experience and a decent ISO seal. Users have been waiting for it since before the alfa6600 came out. We hope to see you soon among us. Thank you very much for the content of the channel.

The Tamron FE mount 17 to 28mm f2.8 is superb and light weight and focuses on the money

I shoot on APS-C and I sort of wish Sony would go out and do a 400-600mm for APS-C. The 70-350mm APS-C lens is incredible fun and I just want more of that form factor but with bigger zoom.

The main GAP is not having firmware updates for our cameras!!! - Sony A74 has better features than the A1. Maybe you can ask Sony why?

We definitely need to see some better high quality tele zooms like a 150-500 f4 or something like this. Also the teleconverters are not really good. The 16-35mm needs an update since a long time too.🙂

I personally wish Sony would have 35mm F1.8 G level, and 85 GM ii

My wishlist: 28mm 1.4 GM 105mm 1.4 GM 28mm 2.5 Mini G 85mm 3.5 Mini G And obviously, and likely due anyway: 85mm 1.4 GM II 85mm 1.2 GM

You only cover short lenses in this video, but I think where Sony needs to do some serious work is in their longer lens lineup. They need to take a page from Nikon's book, and offer lenses such as the 300mm PF, 500mm PF, and 800mm PF, as well as lenses with a built-in teleconverter.

I have read several comments on the Tamron lineup of lenses, which I fully agree with. I used to rely on the Sony 24-105 f4 as my go to lens. The Tamron 28-200 gives better aperture at the wider end and acceptable aperture at the long end. It is not stabilized. Image quality is excellent. I matched it up with the new 16-35 f4 for a light weight package for travel. Sony is a major owner of Tamron, making it almost a second brand for Sony. For light weight versatility, it’s Tamron right now.

I would like a 70/200 F4 Mark 2, the current weight and price of the original F4 is great for a hobbyist, however the corner sharpness is leaves something to be desired

I'd like to see a 400mm f/4. Traveling for wildlife photography is tough with the size and weight of the current super telephotos. On the 300mm/ f/2.8 that is coming, I sure hope it works with existing teleconverters.

I’ve added the Sigma iSeries DG DN f/2 and f/2.8 lenses to compliment my GM lens kit since Sony’s f/2.5 G lenses is not a complete offering. Like your proposals as well. Thank you for the video.

I got into Sony totally by accident when i started, and seeing the absolute plethora of lenses out there for E mount, especially given *other manufacturers* choices when it comes to 3rd party *cough cough* im very glad i chose Sony! Thanks Mark!

Hi mark, I enjoy your videos. I am waiting for the FE 300 F2.8 (I sold my Canon 300 F2.8 II). Now Canons new RF 100-300 F2.8 certainly sets a benchmark for Sony to match. Perhaps a 300 F2.8 with a built-in 1.4 tele would suffice.

Need a compact 28mm f1.4/f1.8 G/GM, one lens that can do landscape, people and street. 24mm too wide and 35mm too narrow as a one prime lens solution.

Hi Mark... I think Sony should make a 50mm 1.8 G lens for enthusiasts. I think Sony should get rid of their 50mm f1.8 old and cheap quality lens form their line up. Furthermore I wonder why sony did not make 14 -30 mm f4 instead of 16-35 (Sony and Zeiss) and both Nikon and Canon has 14-30 and 14-35f4 ....respectively.

For me what is missing the most: 1. 16mm f2.5 G Compact, similar to the 28/40/50mm G Compacts makes a lot of sense and fills a void in the current prime line-up. (as mentioned). It would have to compatible with normal lens filter mounts (no cages). Would be the go to vlogging lens for the full frame cameras, especially the ZV series. Designed for frequent 'Dynamic Steady Shot' 2. 105mm f1.8 G, similar in weight, size, and price to the excellent 20mm f1.8 G. At this focal length I think most want a fairly fast lens for good figure ground separation in portraits, however at 105mm f1.8 will mostly be good enough while still reducing the size and weight quite a bit. Would be the go to portrait lens that hits the sweet spot between maintaining outstanding quality / separation / bokeh and reasonable portability. 3. 200mm f2.0 GM - something to go against the Canon EF 200mm f2, would be more of a niche lens, but fill in the gap between the 135mm f1.8GM and 400mm f2.8 GM

I want a close up macro lens similar to the Laowa 25mm f/2.8 2.5-5X Ultra Macro but with autofocus.

Agree with you. A Small and light, Sony G 17 or 18mm 2.8, would be very welcome. More important is to have a Super Zoom Lens from Sony, something that replaces the old, heavy, big and.. not so good, Sony 24-240. We just have the Tamrom 28-200 as an alternative, I have one and love it but is not a Sony, I would carry some more weight for a Sony G 24-200 f4 with OSS, for exemple.

Yeah love Samyang`s F1.8 offering, they really improved their game. The 45mm is such a fun lens to shoot, with beautiful results. 😊 Pref it over the "old" 55mm Zeiss ... Perfect travel lineup. And i do agree, Sony needs (after years) better/more APS-C lenses. Even for FF crop mode shooters. Cheers Mark!

Add another vote for the 100-400 GM Mark II. I would really like to see Sony innovate on the 100-400 platform like they did on the 70-200 GM Mark II.

Finally, I got my dream lens Tamron 20-40mm 2.8 for the street and a little bit of landscape photography. Changing primes on Sony cameras is a nightmare because of dust. So this lens is 5 prime in one. Light, sharper, and cheaper than the Sony 16-35 F4. I seldom use less than 20mm on the wide end. At low lite for street photography, I use a Samyang 35mm 1.8 which kills the Sony's 35mm 1.8. Lighter, sharper and half-price. (I had that lens) Anyway, the images matter first and the gears a second.

Thank you for your thoughts Mark 🙏🏼 My thoughts: Pls update the 8 year old FE28 F2.0, a wish that comes from several photographers. I use (for astro time lapses and hotel room photography) the 14mm F1.8 GM but sometimes it's surprisingly not wide enough. There are two 12-24 lenses from Sony but a light 12mm F2.8 prime would be excellent. I also like my 40mm F2.5 for city tourist trips, it gives you an unusual perspective a little nearer than a classic 35mm. Maybe some niche small lenses with some unusual focal lengths? And a tilt-shift lens for architecture photography.

I dream of Sony releasing new telephoto primes similar to Nikon. For example I want the Sony equivalent of the NIKKOR Z 400mm f/4.5, Z 800mm f/6.3, and the F 500mm f/5.6. I don't want to have to switch to Nikon to get access to lenses like that.

300mm f2.8 GM with internal TC, or a 100-300mm f2.8 GM. 85mm f1.2 GM, for my A1, A7RIV, A7SIII. Cheers

I would love an updated 24-105mm and a 150-300mm f4 which Sony rumours says is in the pipeline. A 400mm f4 would also be great.

I agree 100% with your wishlist. I have the compact G lenses, the Samyang 75mm, and would love a compact 135mm, or a compact fixed aperture tele zoom. I find for daily carry and travel, size and weight are a major priority.

I'd like the following: * 24-55 mm f2 zoom for events etc. Yes, might be big and heavy that is ok since it replaces at least three primes (24, 35, 50). * 16-35 mm f2.8 zoom that is lighter than the current one and basically flare free and has a really nice sunstar in Voigtländer/Loxia class (like Loxia 21/2.8).

I’d really like them to produce G series versions of their 35mm 1.8, 55mm Zeiss 1.8 and 85mm 1.8 to compliment the 20mm G 1.8. I know we have lenses in that category already but something higher quality, aperture ring etc would be very welcome. This feels especially true with how old the Zeiss 55mm is. I’ve made the bigger jump to the 35mm GM due to this gap but a G variant would be lovely.

I personally would like to see an update to the Sony 85 mm F1.8 lens. I would like to see an F1.8 in a G series similar to the 20mm G form factor.

I would be very interested in a 200-600 with a inbuilt 1.4 teleconverter similar to the new Nikon offering.

Slightly different, but a 15 mm fisheye is the most important lens for many underwater photographers - that's a major gap holding back adoption in that space.

105 1.4! 135 is just a little tough sometimes. Or 1.2 85. I can’t complain…as a portrait guy my 70-200ii doesn’t hardly ever come off my camera unless I need more room then the 50 or 24-70ii. Love my 135 but I have to find excuses to use it 😂 Got that 35 on the way as well. And I am totally on honeymoon with the a7rv…i couldn’t be any happier with Sony honestly they are killing it. Maybe cram 100mp into the one just to make me feel better? And two angelbird 1tb cards on the way. Literally half the price of the Sony tough cards anyone with a cf type a slot…it’s a no brainer. No complaints. We live an incredible time for camera stuff

You just mentioned it at the end and Dale commented on it previously....300 f2.8 but I think it coming next year. I so want it for my indoor music concerts

Hi Mark, I have got the awesome E 16-55 G and the E 70-350 G OSS which are both excellent. However, I would love to add a Sony APS-C wide angle zoom f2.8! Not too keen on the new f4 G lens. I might have to go with the Tamron instead or wait until Sigma comes out with something suitable. Keep up the great content 👍 Thank you!

Still waiting on a smaller lighter 16-35mm GM II.

Before I fully transitioned to FF, I owned the Tamron 17-70 2.8. Paired with the a6400, it was a fantastic bit of kit. Super versatile and quite sharp, even wide open. The lone downside was its size and weight. Would imagine Sony may be able to produce a lighter/smaller version for their lineup. Also - I’m drooling at the thought of the 300 prime to be released in early 24’. Cannon’s new zoom comes in at $10k - so I’m hopeful that a tack sharp prime comes in at a price that truly establishes a competitive advantage for Sony shooters.

An auto focus fish eye. (Not the adapter) for the sports photographers…. And everyone else.

When the A7Cii was announced that was a "Yeah" moment. A compact FF that has what I can/want to use, and not what I don't. The G lenses 24,40 and 50 are just the thing but the existing 85/1.8 is just too heavy, not just for the weight but also the balance in hand. Extend those compact G's with an 85/2.8 or similar

To my mind what's missing out there is lenses with good aperture AND close-up capacities. Not something mad like f1.4, just an all-around 50 or 85 that could have a magnification of 0.25-0.5. The Zeiss 1.8 and Sony 1.8 can be really frustrating regarding the focus distance.

I photograph wildlife and I want longer lenses and I think Sony is very weak compared to other brands. For example, Nikon got 400mm f/4.5, 500mm f/5.6 and 800mm f/6.3. Canon EF 200-400/4 L IS USM Extender 1,4x or Canon EF 400/4 DO. I would like to have something equivalent even if the prices are really high. Or what about something like 500-800/6.3? Or lenses with built in extender like the Nikon 600mm f/4 TC or Nikon 180-400mm F4E TC1.4?

Great Video Mark! I would love to see Sony create an E 20 to 105 GM lens with an f2.8. I rely a lot on my 24 to 105 G f4, but I would definitely go for a GM with a slightly wider starting point.

Mark I'm with you about that 135mm f4! I'm also asking for a 200mm f4 and f2.8. And I think having some system seller lenses are crucially needed in Sony's lens lineup. Like a 100-300 f4 with internal teleconvertor. 300-500 f4-5.6 is another option. We need light budget telephoto primes. 400mm f5.6 is nice to have with half the price and weight of the 100-400 GM! 600mm f8 is another option. These will sell like a hot cake! Something like a 350-700mm f5-7.1 for apsc could be a great touch too. Sony is so behind in lens options for amateure wildlife photographers and the big and heavy 200-600 is the only option for budget bird photographers.

I'd love a 300m f/4 that is TC compatible. I typically use the 135GM cropped as far as 300mm, but would like another prime to continue after 300mm. I'm sure the 300mm f/2.8 will be spectacular, but it will be larger and more expensive than I am looking for.

I'm with you, Mark! I'd snag that 135mm f4 if Sigma or Sony made it! For shorter lenses it's nice to have 2.8, but at 135mm I'd be fine with f4. Thanks to one of your previous videos I picked up the Sigma 90mm f2.8 -- what a great addition to the nice, but shorter, Sony Compact G's. The Sigma I-series is great!

I am looking for updates on two lenses that will challenge Sony’s engineers, and one policy change that will challenge their marketing department: 1) A very sharp, compact, 70-200 f/4 that I could pair with the 20-70 f/4. I want the sharpness of the GM II with a smaller aperture, reduced size, and reduced weight. Ideally one that would work with, and be very sharp with, the Sony TC. Redesign the TC, if need be. f/5.6 or f/8 with a TC would be fine for landscape. If I need wider, I’ll lug around my 100-400. 2) A sharp 24(28)-200, lightweight, single lens hiking/travel solution. f/4 or wider on the wide end, and f/5.6 at the most, on the long end, but ideally a constant f/4. I would trade the variable aperture for size and weight. Also, paying careful attention to color fringing, especially on the wide end and edge sharpness. I am currently stuck with either the 24-105 or Tamron’s 28-200 as Sony’s 24-240 is inadequate. If 24-200 is too wide a range for engineering to achieve the sharpness and reduced color fringing, a 24-180 would suffice. 3) allow third parties to support teleconverters.

A lightweight, affordable 500 f/5.6 would be nice for wildlife photographers.

Need more lenses in the ranges being offered for APS-C cameras. i.e. 17-70.

I have the Sony a73 with the 40 mm f2.5g. it's a great lens with lovely handling and great Optics. I wish Sony would make a 35mm 28mm and a 75mm as well.

I own the Tamron 35-150, and it is an exceptional lens, I would love Sony to build their own GM version with XD motors and ultimate image quality. It would be a huge draw to any wedding/event/sports photographers, and it's a brilliant travel lens if you can tolerate the size/weight. The Tamron had sold very well by the looks of things, I think it could be a winner for Sony

Really interesting thoughts. The wide open zoom apsc is one that would be perfect on the a1.

I wish Sony updated their zooms and primes that don’t have their XD linear motors such as the 16-35 GM, 100-400 GM, 85 GM, 70-200 F4 G, 200-600 G, 24 GM and 90 Macro G. I also think Sony should release a wide Full frame Tilt-Shift GM lens, a full frame fisheye lens and a full frame macro lens that has up to 2x magnification.

The only lens i need and my no 1. wish: A super compact but high quality 23/24mm f2 or 2.8 for aps-c.

What I want is a 25-50/2.8 or even a 25-50/3.2, that is the size of the 50/1.8. Basically a medium wide to standard 2x zoom.

For those not wanting small and light lenses I think the main missing full frame lenses are a new 85 1.4 GM, a new GM Macro lens,a 500 F4 and a 100-500. But the 85 1.4 with decent focusing, please Sony please!!!!!

A 24mm tilt shift and a rectalinear fisheye like Samyang’s 12mm f/2.8

16mm tilt shift would be nice

I enjoy using my 70-350 G and I wouldn't sacrifice the reach for speed unless Sony brings out a higher resolution APS-C body to allow more cropping - not to mention the latest autofocus wizardry in it. A lightweight lens makes sense only on a lightweight body. I'm sticking with the old a6500 for now because the a6600 has grown too big for my liking with its body nearly that of a7c.

I am missing a fast, high quality fish-eye lens from sony with auto-focus...

Great video! 85mm F1.2 GM please! 😂🎉❤

I’d like to see two lenses. An 85 1.8 G/GM, no problem if they also want to produce a lighter 2.8 version too. Plus a 24-200 similar to the Tamron but with the extra width and a constant f8 max aperture with IS. I use to love the Olympus 12-100 that this could be equivalent to.

I agree with your gaps, particularly for travelling light. I use the small and light sigma 28-70 f2.8 as my walk around lens on my A7C, but am missing a good quality small and light wider prime in the 18mm range. I have the excellent 20mm f1.8G, but often leave it behind as it is still on the large size. I would also like a small and light telephoto lens. I would love to see a good quality 135 f4 lens that weighs under 500g. I have the 70-200 f4, but find it to be too heavy and not great quality. It’s my least favourite Sony lens and rarely use it.

I used to own the Sigma 50-150mm F2.8 (1st gen) for APS-C A-mount and absolutely loved it. Since moving to Sony E-mount (also APS-C) I've been longing for a new equivalent with all the improvements of lens designs in the last couple of decades. Also, I'm tempted by the new Sigma 23mm F1.4 but hoping Sony will do an equivalent G-lens that would have all the buttons/aperture ring/etc. seen on other new G-lenses as well as possibly being slightly smaller than the Sigma. I'd be willing to pay extra for that.

I want to see a fisheye lens from Sony. I'm currently using a Samyang and I have a sigma with adapter. A fast super wide would also be great. 14mm f/1.4 or even a 12mm prime. Or if Sony is going to push APS-C for a change, then any of these in equalvalent sizes. I also want a longer...tele macro lens. 150mm minimum, or 180mm better. Let's go!

Personally I'm missing a 105mm f1.4 GM. Currently I'm using the Sigma version of the lens, but it's huge an heavy. A smaller version of this lens would be very welcome for me. f1.8 would be fine too, but it should not be slower than that for me. Also the Sony 24-240mm lens definitively needs an update. In my opinion it's very bad when compared to the Tamron 28-200mm lens. I'm also waiting for a macro GM lens. The Sigma 105mm f2.8 DG DN is in my opinion optically a lot better than the "old" Sony 90mm f2.8 just like the Sigma 85mm f1.4 DG DN is better than the old Sony 85mm 1.4 GM.

100mm f1.4; 120-300mm f2.8; 100-300mm f2.8; 18mm f2.8; 70mm f2. I shoot fashion photography and 2.8 sometimes need beyond 300mm on long runways, but don’t want to pay 9k. Canon just announced 100-300mm f2.8. Sigma has had 120-300mm f2.8 for years.

A7cR + 10-20mm F4 G is amazing combination for video. Best phone camera replacement, because of great stabilization and oversampling from 6k. Also it supports 4k 60fps, no any visible vignetting

A 100-300 would be wonderful, a small and light 70-200 f4 with "macro" capabilities is being rumored, this looks great and hopefully true.

Definitely need a 400mm f4, (so jealous of Nikon users having one). Who can afford 400mm f2.8 at £12,000+

APSC 20mm, 23mm, 24mm or 25mm f1.4 please an f1.8 with the quality of the 11mm f1.8 would also be amazing basically a nice 28mm or 35mm FF-equivalent with G or GM quality and smooth bokeh

My dream FF 100-300mm F4 or new 100-400mm GM Il. 😊😅

Yes fair one I agree with most suggestions I would like a 17mm f4 other than sigmas ugly i series . Also 24-120 f 4 please

The 100-400 is a bit dated now, I’ve even gone down the sigma route because it’s lighter and has a more appealing filter size.

As a Underwater Photographer, I wish to see a Sony full frame fisheye lens. Like the canon 8-15mm. There is currently no native full frame fisheye for Sony.

would really wish to see Sony make: - compact 16mm f2.8 - best in class 28-70mm f2 - 400mm f4.5 like Nikon

I would love to see an aps-c design 50-100 f/1.8(similar to the old Sigma). While the Sigma was a bit on the heavier side, a native e-mount lens like this would be spectacular paired with the a6700. In terms of full frame, I'd like to see something in the 65mm-75mm range with the same form factor as the 24 2.8, 40 2.5 and 50 2.5.

I also vote for smaller and lighter!! I just bought the 20-70mm G for travel

Hello, I am a fan of your supplements and have learned a lot from your videos over the years. As I watch almost all of your videos, I have noticed two things that I would like to suggest to you. Firstly, the intro to your program has become repetitive over the years and may be interesting if it were interpreted differently. Secondly, the sample pictures presented are repetitive and may not attract the audience. Thank you.

One other category is getting kind of long in the tooth: All-in-one zoom. Sony's 24-240 variable is so old and its AF capability is just not up to functioning with latest body AF capabilities. Tamron is killing it with the 28-200, but it choose to compromise narrowing to 28 for compactness. I think that if slightly less compact, an updated 24-200 maybe also f/2.8-4 or even constant f/4 would be a must have lens and well worth the slightly wider and heavier girth than the tamron. I think maybe it would be too good a lens, because it might dissuade (cannibalize) people from buying and carrying around 24-70 + 70-200. A G-series all-in-one zoom?

I'd love a long macro to bridge my ecological work, I'm currently using the 90mm macro and the 100-400 GM (zoomed to 400 it is great for reptiles and skittish insects at 1m distance). Or a toggle on the 70-200 that allows selective 1:1 macro like some sigma lenses years back had

Surprised you didn't comment on the Sony FE 20-70mm G zoom lens. It's wider and longer than the 28-60 kit lens for the a7C, and not that heavy - around 500 grams. I bought it for a nice versatile lens to carry around in a small 6L Peak Design Sling bag with the a7C so I would always have a low weight camera and lens with me. Thoughts, Mark?

I am using sony 35mm zeiss more frequently on my a7riii. F2.8 isn't deal breaker for me who need a compact lens for travel.

I agree on everything, especially some alternative to the samyang 18mm , which I have and I like, also a new 135 should be at least f2.8 to be truly popular in my opinion ….

@MarkGaler we need a Sony Alpha A 7 R V menu setting tutorial like in the other cameras!!! Please!

Would love an affordable option for side-line sports, maybe 200-400 F/4 or faster G-level Sony (or 150-400 F/4 or faster Tamron to match the 35-150/2-2.8).

Hey, Mark what small bag would you recommend for a Full frame like Sony A7R5 with say 2 lenses like 24-105 G and 14mm GMaster along with some 100mm square filters to fit in?

A typically interesting video. For my part, I will never sell either of my SonyZ 55 1.8 or 35Z 2.8. As at least one person has noted,these are not new lens, however particularly the 35 2.8 is compact, light and has just stellar IQ. Almost identical comments apply to the ,still, very underated Sony/Zeiss 55 1.8. Some time ago you reviewed this ,still magic piece of glass, and noted, as a sideline that many owners would never part with their copies. I am one such owner. I am not a pixel peeper, but did note that DXOMARK rated this lens very highly. I have had something of a disagreement with Dustin Abbott, who doesn't really accept views differing from his, his review of this lens was little more than damning it with faint praise. Yes, whichever brand of lens chosen, my preference is ,where possible for Sigma and Tamron, all the IQ I need, for much less than OE prices, it appears there has been a clear move away from 85( whatever speed, though 1.8 is quick enough for me) to see that 135 ff equivalent has almost without major comment, become almost the de facto portrait focal length, in lieu of the traditional 85mm, yes am aware that the large players are making 85 1.4 and 85 1.2- at a quite significant cost unless you are a pro, or mega well heeled amateur. 😅

FF 100-300mm f4?

I am hoping Sony would release a light weight 100-400mm G lens which Ideally, would weigh less than 700gr. Canon already has a light weight 100-400mm RF lens (600gr) even though they don't even emphasize on making their mirrorless system light weight. So I am wondering why Sony is still missing a similar lens in their lens lineup? I used to own the 100-400mm GM lens but it was too heavy to carry around. I switched to the Sigma 100-400mm. While it is lighter than the GM but is still quite heavy.

Sony needs to release a small 23mm f1.8 Apsc prime with OSS. It would be great if they gave it Weather sealing, aperture ring and a custom button. A 27mm f2 pancake lens with the same features would be a great addition. The A6400 has the potential to become one of the best street cameras.

Long telephotos and new specialized macro...that's what we're really missing right now.

APSC 23mm and 35mm G lenses in the style of the 11 and 15mm lenses would be nice. Would also like to see the full frame 50 1.8 and the 35mm 1.8 lenses updated.

Mark, what do you think of the 35-150mm offering by both Tamron and now Samyang? Is this the new 24-70mm range? Should sony and sigma also build one? I think its a fantastic lens that i am looking forward to acquire.

What lens other than the 90mm macro could l use for close up work but from a further distant. A 200mm macro would be good.😀👍