I've forgotten More than you'll ever know.

​@@MicMac.can you tell us more about yourself?

West way to of a

There were no tech details

@@dmitryshusterman9494 he did say “throughout this series”. Most certainly throughout this series and the entirety of the Sandia Labs channel there are many many technical details and specifications that are discussed at great length. I advise you not to check it out though, as I see details are hard for you to pick up on.

77

7

Ggghhhh thegg get hhh h hghh H H H hghh G HB Ngnhryhhhh high

@@traviselden5830 ?

Lol

It's safety-related content; they don't classify it because they are trying to encourage other nuclear powers to evaluate and develop similar safety systems for their own nuclear weapons... to reduce the possibility of inadvertant, accidental, or sabotaged nuclear weapon detonations, and contribute to greater security from theft or rogue use of nuclear weapons in other nation's stockpiles. The US has shared such information in the past with the Soviets and even encouraged and helped them increase security on their nuclear forces after the Soviet collapse. OL J R :)

An USAF guy was sacked for asking just that question relating to the SIOP

John Travolta!

I'm looking for a new kitchen product, appliance, or comparison to do, so I'll review whatever is most requested here. What kitchen product, appliance, or comparison (no bigger than will fit on a countertop) would you like to see me review next? The most liked comment after three days is what I'll review. (Joke suggestions are appreciated but not considered!)

Peter the snowflake 🤪

@@whirledpeas3477 it's a legitimate question that every leader ask himself everyday

Unfortunately it's the situation we find ourselves in. We simply have to do the best we can with what we've got. Even if the US hadn't invented the bomb in WW2, the scientific principles needed to build bombs were already known to be possible and other countries, like Germany and Japan and the Soviet Union, were already working on developing it themselves, with varying degrees of success. So even without the US building the bomb, some other country WOULD have within a decade or two anyway, and we'd be in the same boat. Once someone has it, their enemies have to have it to "defend themselves" and deter attack using them. That genie isn't going back into the bottle, because even with "world peace" (at some future time) there's always the risk that someone will "cheat" and keep some bombs secreted away, or the ability to make them, and that will give them a huge advantage at some point if they wanted to do something bad. So nations will, for the foreseeable future, have a vital interest in maintaining SOME nuclear capability at least for deterrence against such possibilities. Later! OL J R :)

The goal of US foreign policy is not to help the position of the USA in the world. US foreign policy is the tool of a fairly small group of international corporations and think-tanks who benefit in money and power from its actions. They have a phenomenally effective propaganda operation through the mainstream corporate news media.

Yes we do, but good luck with that...

Strategic are less usable than tactical. How big of a yield is too big? Is a 3kt "battlefield" nuke safer than a 1mt strategic warhead? Not in the sense that the 3kt is more acceptable. It's counter-intuitive that a yield that's 1/333 of a megaton, let's say, is actually a more realistic threat.

Want you're $12 back Hank?

Funny as the only nuclear weapons ever used in war were used by a democrat.

@@andrewbellinger6120 👍 Democrats have a huge problem with facts

Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Clinton and Obama were/are all good Republicans.