Both. I hope she's paying through the nose for them.

I am going with the latter.

Lol both

at the lengths amber went to lie & manipulate her way, it isn’t normal. Even a good lawyer is unable to help back up her lies without lying and twisting it further, which could backfire. i’d say it’s the latter. Unless the lawyer can catch up with AH’s narrative and one up her in making her look innocent.

DING DING DING

Daisy?! Lmao

🤡🤡Amber's Lawyer

She has an Elizabeth Warren vibe.

yah Amber's lawyers obtained their law degrees with 2 proofs of purchase of cracker jack LMAO

Actually, given how flimsy Heard's case is, there's some all-star representation in this cross-examination.

It's pretty clear what's happening next: Amber will lose the case. Jail is likely, but she may also end up in inpatient care. Either way, this woman shouldn't be on the streets.

"So you are aware Mr. Depp enjoys pizza, correct? You are aware Mr. Depp eats other foods, correct? Do I know what Arnica cream is? No. Because I call it Amica cream. Im having a stroke your honor." This case from Ambers end is just sad.

@@SGaming-cw7vh make me wonder if it would have been easier to settle for a lesser amount and say something like “money might do more good if used for psych treatments for Amber” and go for the “have some pity for this clearly somewhat mentally unstable person” route

This is a civil case, so no jail time. It’s likely he’ll win this case since the burden of proof is beyond a reasonable preponderance (51% likelihood the allegations are true). In criminal court there has to be a 99% chance, he could also win. However, statue of limitation says 6 years, max, for domestic violence cases. So it’d unfortunately be thrown out, and prosecutors wouldn’t pursue.

@@ironik4400 objection hearsay :D

Fully agree!

She was asking questions that she couldn’t even read correctly.

lawyers are allowed to play with any witness's feelings, not to a point of genuine disrespect or outright rudeness, but it is a strategy to rile someone up to get them to trip in their words. It seems that is the only strategy her team is attempting. Both attorneys/lawyers come off as semi-hostile to get a reaction.. no one is taking the bait.

thats something even good lawyers do. Kinda like a hail mary

It is possible that Amber demanded this to be done as she was paying..

YES I AGREE

@@selfesteem3447 Can I call Dibs on JD? 🙃 I've hallways though he was a great actor but now I just pray for his happiness! Poor guy!

@@josephhect5339 how are you gonna make a comment like this lord Jesus grab the wheel

Loved it when she told the lawyer if they can just move on from the muffin thing. Like how many times do they have to go through that lol

Heard's lawyer thought she could intimidate her and boy was she was wrong. I loved that she would tell the lawyer she was wrong or incorrect without batting an eye.

I can't get over the fact she said she wasn't a lawyer, so she wasn't sure. The attorney just proceeds to assume the complexities of psychology. (Paraphrasing): "mR. dEpP sAiD bOrDeRliNe AnD yOu SaId TyPe B pErSoNaLiTy" Heard does have a type B personality. The evidence shows there is something wrong with her behaviour. Those audio recordings show she is emotional and destructive (classic for a Borderline personality). Having a Borderline personality doesn't mean she is a bad person, but without treatment she is a danger to herself and others.

@Don't click profile photo ok 👍

Exactly! I peeped that was exactly what the lawyer was trying to do! Just another manipulation tactic

time ?

@@kintsugi2262 3:17

Someone needs to take Dr Curry out for drinks. She deserves it!

Well, that's probably what she thought afterwards as well, but she has no way of knowing if those questions lead up to something important for this case. At least she shot her down herself once or twice, without any objections proposed. She's probably gonna do it more as the case drags on and she finds they really have nothing but trick questions up their sleeve.

💯‼️

I don’t know whether its up to the judge to decide who should be Amber Heard’s counsel. Am I right? Just asking…….

That's not up to the judge. This is a legal proceeding, the lawyer is allowed to question the witness.

Yeah that's the part that made me lose the most respect for her. The rest of it, she was just doing her job trying to portray the psychologist as unreliable. But that part was just rude and bullying. And the psychologist takes it so well and isn't fazed at all.

@@monkiram to be fair she is a forensic psychologist, after all

To be fair, most people seem to be under the impression that personality disorder can be cured. So it would probably be a good thing to explain that it can’t, nor can it be mitigated with medication

Folks seem to get mental illness and personality disorder confused a lot. I haven’t watched that part of this interrogation or interview or whatever, I am under the impression that mental illness is quite different

@@spiralrose Actually, the symtoms of borderline can greatly reduce and almost completely become diminished through treatment and age.

I found it delicious that almost every time she passive aggressively went “is that correct” Doc would just look up in the air and go nope

Exactly this psychologist was amazing 🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

@@ianleonard3264 Delicious? Wtf? Out of all the words in the English language to use as an adjective you pick delicious? Really? Well, ill give you props for thinking outside the box 📦👏 lol.

fr, I'm only halfway through the video and she told her "that's not correct" like 10 times. or more. that lawyer is at the wrong job, being a clown is way better and more fitting for her.

This was awsome!!

It's actually a shame to all lawyers to have such bafoons working in the field, they try SO SO hard to get this case over to Amber to win. (frankly I'd be surprised if she won). But they have nothing but speculation, hearsay, no real evidence, going AGAINST a professional Psychologist and asking 10.000 of the same questions. I really hope the jury can see through all this BS and call JD as the winner.

Timestamp?

@@dataengineer4424 around 14:35

Whoops sorry, 13:10

@@dataengineer4424 13:18

Lol right!

😂😂😂👌🏽

What are the psychological tricks?

@@irvingdelgado1731 it's like you're manipulating someone to do something that is in your favour by tricking them using psychology. A common example is reverse psychology.

@@irvingdelgado1731 some examples are trick questions (which lawyers like to use) or rephrasing what was said differently to change the statement unnotified.

She is also bad

@@Leonedwards01 bad why

@@syel2219 nvm

@@syel2219 I believe this fine gentleman was referring to her being 'bad' in the sense that she is an attractive woman.

Her demeanor was a complete opposite of the way the other so-called expert for Amber’s side of things acted in her witness testimony

I disagree , I think you’re on the right track she came out better as a witness for the prosecutor But the defense did manage to punch a little hole in her credibility and that’s the interesting thing about these trials in my opinion. So many angles.

@@peterhaas447 What would you say the hole in her credibility is? I've been struggling to follow this exactly and haven't been paying attention to the dates lol

@@peterhaas447 I don't see any holes in her credibility. I see a witness who is firm in her experiences before and during this trial, and a professional who is not swayed by leading and confusing trick questions. Honestly, the defense has only made herself look like an incompetent and scummy attorney by deliberately undermining expert findings, using trick questions to confuse witnesses in the hopes they stumble and say something they don't actually mean, and by denying an expert the ability to explain what something means. That only shows this defense team does not care about truth or fact, just winning by all means necessary.

@@yakuzzi35 so far all the lawyer did was state the fact that this dr has never been in court. So idk where her credibility fell. But to me her work as a doctor didnt lose any credibility, but her experience in court has no credibility. But then again. Id hope many psychologist would not have that court experience. Because thatd be sad.

@@kobakobakoba Just because she has little to no court experience doesn’t mean she’s not an expert in her field, which is the most important factor to the case

The cringe is almost painful

Yes, I'd definitely want this Dr. testifying on my behalf if I ever needed her in court.

Yes, and she’s sexy too

😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

Its a lawyer its her job. She was just trying to make the doctor very uncomfortable on purpose with her aggressive attitude and difficult questions, hoping that she would break, and trying to make people question her credibility and professionality. Its not pleasant for the doctor but she is a threat for ambers defence so they did everything they could to discredit her. Its nothing personal.

Dr. Curry

You meant to say Dr. Curry?

@@Arwyn76 Have you ever read your own comments? Please take a break from the internet!

@@Arwyn76 jeez what a snowflake. you definitely have a personality disorder haha

yeeeeeeeeeeep

i don't think she's a bad lawyer. She knows what she's doing. This amount of manipulation wouldn't be possible for less knowledgeable person.

@@w0jda195 She's grasping for for anything, to try and defend her guilty client.

Thank you! That was so funny. What a scum bag that lawyer is.

@@w0jda195 I guess I should have been a lot more clear. She's a bad person is what I mean. As far as being a lawyer she's actually not that great of a lawyer. At least compared to Depp's team.

She's classy af.

Agree 100%

@@marcsman07 classy, smart and extremely well prepared in her field

She's a better role model than Amber Heard

light years better... I actually doubt AH can serve as a positive role model at all🤷

@@thinkingallowed7042 they CAN diagnose they cannot prescribe

@@noahgm9629 ive been in therapy for over 10 years. this is absolutely correct. my psychologist can and has given me diagnoses. she cannot prescribe me medication. my psychiatrist can and has given me diagnoses AND can and has prescribed me medicaton.

@@thinkingallowed7042 not true.

@@insomniacraccoon But that doesn't mean your psychologist's opinions would be approved as a diagnosis by a medical practitioner independent of the psychiatrist's diagnosis. Any documents provided to you by a psychologist should not contain the words diagnosis prior to a diagnosis by a psychiatrist. From what you wrote about being diagnosed by a psychiatrist, it would seem your psychologist is able to refer to a diagnosis because you have been diagnosed, by a psychiatrist.

@@trillbrown3686 Yes, it is.

I picked up on that, strange that the psychiatrist didn't call her out on it though

Literally

@@ColdSold1eR probably figured lawyer would continue to dig her own grave & that her, the judge, & everyone else would know better as that just basic knowledge most people have when it comes to mental illness & being able to differentiate between them

@@emmabunch-benson4795 Very true

@@poot7743 You may have a point, but if that's the case, it didn't work lol

as an ancient Chinese saying goes: don't put schlong in crazy

i've learned the same thing. Very helpful.

I have learned so much from this video than I ever could so far. Kudos to Dr. curry

No, science, especially physics, can never be "the truth". We can create models that will approach what we observe as close as possible, but we'll never know if it's the truth. There isn't some grander being that will one day tell us "yes, that's it, you found the real theory of gravitation." That's why they're called theories. That said, I liked your comment and I got the idea :3

It's like a coach trying to teach Messi how to play soccer.

@@katerinapatiniotis5598 and a hockey coach at that

Man she's trying so hard 🤣

@@elaineelaine6418 lol nothing you said is correct and it’s sad 9 lost souls upvoted it. There have literally been thousands of instances where scientists were able to prove their theories as true. That said I am being a little bit assinine as you’re specifically honing in on physics. Of all the scientific fields physics probably contains the most theories that will never be 100% proven to be truth for various reasons that can be summed up as it’s not realistically feasible.

Yes, some faith in humanity restoring brain functions going on in her head

Totally agree! Amazing woman!

Most impressive us she doesn't fall into any of the traps laid for her.

Speaking of well-spoken, it's "eloquent," unless you're speaking Spanish lol. No shade, this comment was written well otherwise

You can’t really play mind games with an expert on the mind

That made me think if it's possible for jury's to have biased cases. If I was the jury, I absolutely would have not bothered to listen to AH's side and just ended it with making johnny innocent and amber the perpetrator

it is not uncommon for insecure, older women to treat younger, "pretty" females this way. With hostile condescension. No matter how intelligent or accomplished the younger woman may be, the insecure older woman will try desperately to undermine and discredit her.

Yeah it’s a little confusing, I think maybe she’s trying to say that she’s disqualified for this case because A) she has never testified within a similar case B) she met with the legal team before and would’ve had to make them believe she would give the diagnosis they wanted to hear despite not making an expert opinion yet. Idk though court is confusing

It's to discredit the witness so her testimonials hold less weight

big time. She reads them all like a book.

Its nothing personal its just their job. The doctor is smart enought to know that.

If Mrs.Curry wasn't married..Johnny would sweep her off her feet...she was epic!👍

She's a paid expert and I'm sure she was chosen because of her knowledge and her calm demeanor.

@@julietteoscaralphanovember2223 and the lawyer was supposed to be a paid expert too :)

Perfect example of what's done in the dark always comes to light.

Women we need in the legal system 🔥

I was just thinking that.

Just how most psychologists are tbh

@@schwarz8614 - Sadly, this isn't accurate. Far far far from it. I wish it weren't so.

That’s why she hired them 🤣

Johnny fell in love with her, she's wonderful.

You can roll your eyes?!?! Don’t they get dusty, dirty or damaged if you do that? How do you reattach them? This is fascinating.

well, they are also poorly informed thanks to their client lying 24/7. i assume they THINK they know at least most answers and end up suprised to find out their client is talking bs 24/7. how would you handle such a situation?

@@DrOinkman it's a hard one to be honest. You have to defend your client no matter if you think they are correct or not. They know what she is, they know the story is all over the place. Without seeing all the evidence I could not tell you a plan, but some of the questions they got wrong where factual statements by psychologists, incorrect accounts from key witnesses they had interviewed, medical reports the list goes on. Not to mention objecting there own questions. They are ridiculous. Never be the aggressive lawyer with near rude questions and language when defending the aggressor. They should be trying to make there team, and amber seem calm and professional, the nice guys in the room. Make the jury side with you. They are doing anything but that.

@@leccy9901 Very interesting insights on this trial from a legal professional. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.

The worst part of all this is they have a strong favor to win and they are still trying to pull all these tricks.

A strong case is just another way to take Amber's money.

@@Ilovegrunge123 what case are yoy watching. Depp is obviously in the right

i love it

@@Ilovegrunge123 Where is the favor? Let alone "strong"....hello?

Yeah that literally made no sense. 'You said you did this' 'No' 'Let's turn to this pointless page' 'Ok' 'Can you read what you said' 'It says 'no'' LMFAO

This lawyer sucks it

She asked the same questions over and over like the Dr would answer differently the next time she asked.

That's the whole point, to provide your client with the best defense possible. Ultimately the jury will decide.

it's the stereotypical arrogant condescension of a lawyer who actually in fact does not know anything

A prepared professional maybe, but a manipulator of the facts! One of the few careers where manipulative ways are applauded and even beneficial - being a lawyer. 😂🤣

yeah, the entire time im like can she stop fcking trying to make her seem like an invalid witness? like if u want to see whether or not she testified about smth dont worry we'll send u her resume, CAN U STOP ASKING IF SHE TESTIFIED about stuff so freaking specific?!

She's not easily rattled.👍

Condescending and rude! It would prejudice me against Amber.

She’s great and unflappable

@Don't click profile photo I won't

You really don't have to be smart.

Trying to outsmart a professional that deals with people’s mind problems 😌 that lawyer was set up to be schooled by Dr. Curry

“Fake it till you make it”

@Don't click profile photo Commence eye roll

Frrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

I've become a fan tbh. She's a pro and didn't take the smear merchant's BS easily.

?? Actually, she is making it clear she is not a neutral as suggested. She is the victim of fraud and defamation by the people who are paying her (Depp & Co.), and she is covering up the magnitude of their wrongdoing with her failure to flag their alleged crimes.

She couldn’t even understand the simple questions….

**LOVE THE REPLY!!!**

Objection, your honor. Hearsay.

@@patricknelson 🤣🤣🤣

That is absolutely brilliant 🤣🤣

Bredehoft brought up court documents from February 2021 from Depp's attorney filed in February 2021, stating Curry would testify to Heard having borderline personality disorder, making false allegations and being a perpetrator of intimate partner violence. However, she did not meet with Amber until December 2021. The ‘psychiatrist’ is a fraud.

Yes that was sooo bad

For this lawyer, its hard enough to pronounce words correctly 🤣🤣🤣

@@davetrotter6735 LMAO

I mean, one of Amber's lawyers accidentally objected to his own question, so... 😂

@@davetrotter6735 LMAO

@20-20 Hindsight it's more that her expertise in how the mind and emotions work, as well as her daily experience weaving through these complex labyrinths in patients and cases makes her impervious to their tricks and tactics to manipulate her and control jury perception

🤣🤣

The problem is that they are grasping at straws, they have no case and are trying desperately to find something to save their case, they are likely great lawyers but they've been dealt the shittiest of hands.

I think they know very well who their client is and are playing the "bad guy" to please her (and get paid). Be aware that profiles like AH usually take pleasure in not paying people, or paying very late, or suing their own lawyers... so her lawyers are in a complex situation.

@@DakonBlackblade2 they’ve also been caught lying to the court, and being shady

Theyare not incompetent. What else can they do.

This already made no sense before After reading your comment and the way you worded it, makes the idea that you can develop a personality disorder this late in life in response to trauma 1000x times more idiotic.

What are you talking about? The idea that it is literally impossible to develop a personality disorder (there's no such clear definition just fyi) after the age of 18 (just couldn't be 22) is not a thing.

@@tffvn4492 It is a thing. The behavior pattern that constitutes the personality disorder needs to be present before or at onset of adulthood. Quoted from the DSM5: "The pattern is stable and of long duration, and its onset can be traced back at least to adolescence or early adulthood." During my clinical psychology degree, practitioners giving lectures on personality disorders generally told us that the behavior being present by the time one enters adulthood (age 18 in my part of the world) will make up 99% of all PD cases. If you have a proper understanding of personality disorders and the intense dysfunction they bring, you will understand why it is so unlikely that such a large qualitative difference (going from no to a PD) would occur in middle adulthood. Being diagnosed later in life happens frequently, newly developing one is practically impossible.

@@glittery8862 Again, no it is not impossible.

@@tffvn4492 Then how would it be possible, if I may ask?

I agree with you

totally opposite vibe for me ...narc vibess

She could be a role model, and also simply a model.

@@MM-wv7ys you got that from the video???? Maybe the narc is another...

@@augustoalvarez6766 notjust from this video but because of her presentation..

Worst part is, she responded that she has testified before. That lawyer is asking questions she doesn't know the answers to

And despite saying it was an interview and not dinner 8-9 times the lawyer continued to call it dinner and drinks. Specifically looking to discredit the witness versus trying to understand their testimony and pulling it apart.

Because she obviously shows a bias towards Johnny who wined and dined her for an 'interview' at his place.

@@alanrush1381 Trained to be unbiased, try again.

@@alanrush1381 What bias? She got interviewed by the legal team of Johnny Depp at his place and then they offered dinner to thank her for her time.

I was just thinking the same. This psychologist is very impressive.

To be fair....she was just telling the truth...you cant trick a truth teller; and why would the doctor get stressed over heards lawyers?....she's not Depp or heard,she's just giving the evidence as she saw it She's not emotionally involved....dealing with mentally ill patients every day is a lot harder than dealing with heards lawyer

@@denchiC doctor 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

I like Dr. Curry, she's better looking than Amber and cool as a cucumber.

you can tell she's used to listening to and responding to bats**t questions.

also intelligent

@@thuanchau1985 also HAWT

@@ericohm9474 also MILF GOODNESS!

@ginger tostada. 🤣😂😂😂You’re SO wrong. She’s just a paid shill for jonny who was so starstruck she stared at Johnny the whole time on the stand. Pathetic

... and simply GORRRGEOUS❤

the lawyer is out of her league with this trial ENTIRELY

🤣

Yes because she's been continuously taking notes and trying look a certain way every trail I've watched. Kinda makes me cringe.

@@victoriaphantom13 I know eight. A different personality each day.

10/10 would approach her and perform the mating dance hoping she’s impressed.

It's really hard to succeed in acting like Dr. Curry when you're constantly lying x) Her classy/smart attitude comes from straight up facts and truth, something AH lacks cruelly x)

Presumably she’s a forensic psychologist

@@ArsenicApplejuice objection. Hearsay.

I’ll sustain it

@@ArsenicApplejuice I could’ve sworn she said clinical but either way you’re still qualified to evaluate and diagnose patients

And the entire court room’s surprised faces were literally all of us. Very clear example of how Heard’s lawyers are trying to manipulate the narrative.

Love how Dr Curry, the crowd, Johnny, everyone laughed at that. That lawyer is a joke.

can I get a time stamp?

@@tedmosby3942 13:18

@@sneharubhiniks5045 thank you mate

She is basically a karen who became an actual lawyer.

Difficulties,? She's stumbling and reading the wrong words. Lol What a fail

Ugh yes this lawyer is so irritating!! She is driving me nuts! Curry on the other hand is handling her in such a respectful, dignified and intelligent manner 🙌🏼

It’s her job dude. Zealous representation of the client. It’s how our legal system works.

attorneys do that when they're not getting the answers they want. they resort to grandstanding and attempted intimidation. it's almost as if Depp's counsel knew Heard's attorney was going to give themselves the rope to hang themselves with

For sure THIS ONE IS. : )

We are Jedi's my friend. I can control a conversation with ANYONE.

Simple lawyery intimidation has no power on academics

I think garbage truck workers have a higher IQ than Amber’s lawyers

I know right. Cannot stop smiling!

Ice cold. I loved it.

timestamp?

@@PsychH0e- 9:27

I wish she would have answered "no" when asked if she read that correctly

Her attorneys are not likeable. And understandable that a celebrity is going to want interview to be in their realm, not a restaurant or other venue

It is very genuine that when someone's opinion is being counted then to see if they are experts or not.

Actually she didn't nees to defend herself as she didn't do anything wrong

Hehe that's what she does, she's a trained psychologist.. can't win against someone with such credentials.

Did she even answer any questions? She evaded most of them.

@@tylerkloever4442 she answered all of them, and even corrected the errors of Amber’s lawyer

@@tylerkloever4442 what do you meaning?

@@tylerkloever4442 How do you want to answer some question that has error in it?

Don't just dream it, be it :) I believe in you, now if you do, you are unstoppable!

It's not just confidence it's competence. You can be confident in something wrong, but you can't be competent using something wrong. Dr. Curry is an absolute professional, in the truest sense of the word.

That's 15 years experience of dealing with trash lawyers, unlike what Amber's lawyer was trying to imply.

@@heehoohehehe1267 True! Wish to be that competent honestly

Lmao all you want in life is to be more like a psychologist from a celebrity court case?

Jordan when are you coming past the ship for a nice lunch to see your old Admiral Boom.

Oh but they will keep circling back to the dinner and drinks, you’know because that part was the most important ….

@@mollyhelmm The muffins

It's not professional nor is it appropriate for a forensic psychologist to be having a dinner at the client's home. It was foolish of Amber to agree to have it done. Forensic psychologists are appropriate for a crime case this is not a crime case it's a civil lawsuit. Many people fall for this thinking that the forensics psychologist is going to help exonerate them... When would a forensic psychologist does is look for pathologies. A forensic psychologist is going to find pathologies in most everyone... But people innocently take any evaluation baking and believing that it somehow will exonerate them when would it is actually designed to do regardless of who is taking it... Is to find all of their pathologies. People believe forensic psychologists are just scientists free of bias... And that what they're doing could not possibly be anything but objective science. However that is not true. Regardless of who is being tested interpretation of facts and subjective interpretation is 100% of what a forensic psychology assessment is it's merely an opinion.. regardless of who it is about...

@@helloworld2784 THE MUFFINS! The bloody muffins, THE DINNER AND DRINKS. The sheer audacity of Johnny’s team for having a cool interview. ILLEGAL 😎

Yes. Love that about her also

It’s very satisfying

I would hope so she is a phycologist

What do you expect from Caitlin Jenner doing cross questioning

And whatever you do, do not forget about the muffins!

@@Tyrfingr XD

Neutral? She went to dinner and drinks at Johnny Depps house before she was employed. ‘I did not know Johnny Depp, I had seen his movies’. Contradiction, a defensive one too if you watch her response to that.

@@ladygodiva4141 she did not know Johnny Depp personally, but she knew OF him I think it's pretty easy to understand the meaning of that, and the next two questions make it clear as well

A lawyers job is to do whatever it takes to win Playing dirty as well

They’re desperate

Yeah but playing dirty when you’re trying to prove you’re not abusive just seems like a bad move. The lawyer got caught withholding key information (it was an interview) from the jury. AH’s team set the precedent that they tell half truths to get a desired outcome. Quasi abusive behavior itself.

Because laywers like her who have this holy-than-thou attitude aren't aware of those things.

And highly biased

The laughter from the crowd too. It is both unexpected for some one to be so rude and ruthless, but completely expected from Heard's legal team.

Yeah they are like wtf hahaha

I don't know anything about law, but what is the value of asking questions if you are the one controlling the answers that are providen. If you are asking me something and at the same time stating how much can I say then there is not value at all, it is like reading a book skipping pages. -Did you say this? + Yes I said that because... - I don't care, it is a yes or no question. Then why the f are you questioning me if you don't want a full answer.

can you give the timestamp?

@@rarasmith2544 13:04

Lol once their heads stop spinning

Depp and his team were, that's for certain.

And the lawyer is very ill prepared.

Seriously.

THIS lawyer & AH are mimicking the same jacket! How quUTE!

Yes, the woman who is asking. She's the prosecutor, right?

@@Brasileiro222 no, that’s the woman that called multiple personality disorder a bipolar disorder. That wasn’t intelligent or articulate at all. He’s talking about the Dr that corrected her.

She's beautiful too, her glasses are so stylish lol

@@honinakecheta601 yess very

And so more beautiful than AH 😅

Well, I think thats a strong stretegy to be honest. Of course it might be cheap, but they have to do something to put against the diagnosis of the doctor. And the best thing is to look her being biased. And even if they manage to get doubt in the jurys head, they were kinda successful.

@@HolyNarz they were only successful in getting that into YOUR head lol

@@cutieworldwideee Explain how are reading that out of my comment?

@@HolyNarz Yeah asking her if she thinks Johnny Depp is a good actor as well lmfao

Her credibility as a witness is pretty questionable if she has been having 3-4 hour dinners with him and his legal team. There is no doubt about that regardless of who you think is in the right or wrong in this case.

She was referring to a private meal where she might've been offered something more.

Oh, but it wasn't a "meal". It was "dinner and drinks" 🤔🤔😂😂

To me it's just basic manners to offer food and drinks when you invite someone for a meeting. That lawyer is reaching by trying to make it sound like a bribe 😂

@@karishmadesai1408 Furthermore she cut everytimes in if the doctor tried to explain a circumstance more precisly. That's just awful and unprofessionell. (well at least in my eyes)

@@karishmadesai1408 duh, people making out like they had a party

Just because AH gets movies like that doesn't mean psychologists resort to the same.

@@Queen_KRoy well the thing is we tend to see the world the way we are inside ourselves so... That tells a lot when trying to incriminate someone exterior ourselves of something or things that we would actually be able to do ourselves

because she wants $100 million from him.

Just trying to discredit her

My brain cells....😣😣😭😭😩😩🥺🥺 Trying to imply that Dr Curry had dinner and drinks with Mr Depp in however many ways that lawyer tried to say it... made me want to peel my face off...

Ongg like who do you think you are woman?

"but it goes to bias"... Judge is like, I heard you. I said no. Move on.

Well the judge sustained the objection so...lol

The attorney is rude period not just to the judge

The attorney getting shut down was so satisfying to see her stammer that in all honesty. She wouldn't have started "B-B-But that's not speculation" if that objection didn't monkey wrench one of the last avenues available to her to try and trash this psychologist's reputation.

*vile

Better question is how can that lawyer think they can psychologically outsmart someone living in that field with years of experience

volatile? lol

@@kvngyoun I'm guessing autocorrect from vile for some reason

It’s not as important as her patience and intelligence, but she’s a beautiful woman too!

Right calling it a dinner over and over

She's wording it like it's a date, instead of an appointment. It fails miserably.

"Dinner and drinks", trying to make it sound like they busted out the Cristal and MDMA and partied the night away its ridiculous

Then the lawyer asked… Why are you resisting that question? Why won’t you answer it? Like… She really had to ask that? Lol