facts

You got that all wrong. She pledge the 7 millions dollars. Her career is rebounding, it's only a matter of a few decades.

@@TestTest-ve4ih lol

@@chelsea3564 bless yours for not knowing that's sarcasm

actions was and has been her decline

exactly! correlation analysis is a very basic statistic analysis that is used in many fields. I am surprised an expert can't even distinguish the difference of correlation and causation which is not a term in statistics.

I know, I was thinking to myself, ''listen, lady, if you're going to use words in this trial, you're going to need to know the difference between 'correlation and causation''.

lol guys when you’re a witness on a stand being cross-examined you want to avoid answering as many opposition questions as you can. She is doing what she’s supposed to.

Where on earth did AH's team find these 'expert' witnesses?

You miss her reason for skipping this and explaining why she's not a semantic expert. So stop trying to be an expert! Its so obvious why she responded as she did!

I know! How did everyone not bust out laughing?

@@bmyra I’m sure they were laughing behind the cameras.

I like "flush the turd' also!

@@stacyward4309 what about Aquaturd?

Also the stand is a flop!! With only 28 mil budget. Lol. Joke

lol I guess you also dont know him very well cuz his name is Robert Pattinson.

@@ashamedashley389 the commentator certainly still knows more than Amber‘s so called „expert“.

Sounds like a guy with a life.

Yes about Jayson big box office stair not the other person come on now

Take it your team amber

@@thebeardedbudgettraveler6871 absolutely not

It cracks me up that she didn’t know she wasn’t in blade

@@honeybee6858 highlight of the day was the lawyer asking the DR if he watched Willy wonker 😂😂 🤦🏼‍♀️ the guys horse lips 😂

Not knowing who Alice Eve was or that Chris Pine was Captain Kirk. I thought she was an expert on Hollywood.

Word!

train wreck in slow motion

It figures JD would get blamed for 'bad publicity' even though people just saw AH for what she really is .. which is a scheming liar .

It is so clear that Johnny Depp should loose here. Amber didn't make him a heavy drunk and junkie, and he made his layer destroy Amber's reputatiion.

@@youkasiia being a drunk or a junkie doesn't make you an abuser. And to be fair she started demolishing his reputation long before this trial

He's a far better attorney than Vasquez. She's childish and unprofessional. A lot of the lawyers, on both sides, in this trial are very unprofessional, but Vasquez is probably the worst.

Could you imagine needing psychiatric help and being put in front of this opinionated ,argumentative individual .You would want drugs just yo get through it.

@@Janice_Kinase you're completely wrong. Her style is to bait them into standing by a statement that they've previously contradicted then present them with the contradiction. When you are learning this type of interrogation, you learn that if you are getting under the skin of the witness then they let their story slip in favour of trying to fight you. Emotions take over.

@@flippineck2825 YES

@@Janice_Kinase I’m actually interested in why you think so? Do you mind elaborating?

💢well said. At first I thought in the negative description you said first. But it dawned on me that it seems more tactical and controlled than just randomly used. After reading your comment, it made much more sense that is exactly what is happening. He is extremely brilliant and well prepared. Well done on your assessment

Thank you. I’ve been trying to say that myself. I think that his style . He’s a smooth operator. Johnny’s team is a “TURDANATOR “!

I agree

Right. He basically got her to prove why Amber should not be recieving the amount she sued for even If she can win this case. Amber set herself up, she underestimated Johnny's lawyers. They are using her own "experts" against her while proving their expertise to be unreliable.

a bit like columbo , they underestimate him when in fact he is sharp as a tack

I am not!! kinda follows the others

Not one of her witnesses made sense to me dawg it's crazy!

Another one that will be jobless because of Amber lol

That’s their 15 minutes of fame!!!

Yeah I’m in love with him he’s the beeest !!!

I thought the same.

I agree he's a master at what he's doing

This ”expert” is bullshitter and nice to see her get tangled in the web of her lies

Not saying dude isn't brilliant, but the witness is a buffoon. She doesn't know the difference between correlation and causation and she doesn't know that if it's true it's not defamation 🤣

social media professional never took intro to psychology

She's not an expert in semantics? Like.OK? So you don't understand the words or what?

Exactly!!! This is basic information! What exactly is is she an expert in?

Seems more like she’s a huge fan of Lumber Turd like damn 🤣

@@golpop that doesn't come only in psychology, it appears in almost every field. Science, law, maths etc.

Yes!!! Across the line with ALL narcissists... Great point!

A. did cause her own popularity decline. The "tree" called A. started the first "fire" just by the way she treated JD from the beginning. Even if she wins, she still looses bc it's the public in the long run that buys movies, clothes, magazines...whatever she's connected to. Pretty sad.

Well said 👏👏

YEP, YOU ARE SPOT ON!!!!

Yes!!! Agree with you!!!👍👌

My thoughts exactly. In her mind she’ll never be responsible for any wrongdoing. Maybe Johnny should’ve slapped some sense into her. Or given it the old college try anyway.

the fact is that you are mistaken to believe she will lose anything...the worst outcome is that she will be offered free therapy for life because she is still a victim and a FEMALE

@@bigheart270 unfortunately she did this to herself. she never suffered any PHYSICAL abuse. & she also JUST admitted the op ed was about johnny. so that's about it lol case closed. that's what the trial was about anyway.

@@bigheart270 it sucks that a narcissistic psychopath like amber has this much screen time at all :( i hope she DOES get help because she needs it. maybe now she truly will have PTSD.

Always blaming others....what's that sound like?

Please name the shady things she's done.

@@zulygirl4412 pooping in the marital bed and blaming it on the dogs. illegally traveling to Australia with the dogs and blaming the lack of paperwork for the dogs on her P.A

ZulyGirl I won’t say she did anything bad because I have no idea. To me, she is just an awful actress. For them to say the movie was successful because of her…she is the reason we didn’t buy the movie, download, etc. Not a personal fan of Nicole Kidman, however she did a great job in the movie. She showed love and empathy. Amber as an actress🤢

there are temporal links of witnesses being threatened and their depositions made against ambers story.

Kari ikr! Catheryn Arnold embarrassed herself lol smh

he sounds kind of nervous and soft when he talks but actually he is a stone cold killer, he is very good. his demeanour makes you think he is not...at first.

One might say he’s got a speech impediment. Also they have him do the more minor parts of the trial and witnesses. It’s less contentious. Had they had him cross Amber or Johnny there would have been a lot more activity from opposite counsel.

It was a tactic using Camille…woman to a woman. He is great with grilling this witnesses and Camille was also a killer during her cross on AH. They make an excellent team

He's a partner at the law firm representing Johnny, so this guy must be very well versed in trial.

Dennison is stellar, as is Waldman, Chew, Vasquez, Curry!!!

That's shame

The solution they’ve clearly come up with is to just pay both

She literally said Causation and Correlation are just semantics, despite them being objectively very, very different things

But amber continues to drag it out making it worse for herself, battling ever step of the way, gaslighting the world. She should have settled so the defacation didn't come out. That all on herself.

She could be sitting pretty with that seven million right now but instead she's going to have to pay the charities AND owe Johnny($50million??) 😆

She is not a good actress. Low grade movies is all she is good for. This is my own opinion.

Meghan Markle acts just like her . Both believe their own lies .

I don't think it's technically gaslighting if it's only working on like 2% of people who are Turd fans. Lol. She's TRYING to gaslight and failing miserably with a large majority of us.

It really does

great point and observation!

She's a gold-digger.

It only goes to show she thinks she's worth more as an actress

As if her career had that kind of earning potential. Johnny only sued against the money he could prove he lost. She’s suing for something only she thinks she’s worth in her mind. The delusion.

A 'Crappy' person lmfao

💩

Before the trial I never knew who she was so idk if a crappie actress but a crappie person that she is

Time stamp?

@@raafatawar8005 14:57 is when he starts talking about it and the witness laughs.

Too true. I read once that in order for evil to prevail it only requires good men/women to remain silent. I probably haven't got it exactly but hope you get the gist

Give her a break... Dennison asked her the very tough question of "Correlation itself does not imply Causation does it"....

Very true. They need to put out what her worth and assets were prior to her even meeting Johnny. And what it was before the attorneys statements. That would be interesting.

Because he was helping her get parts.

and she ruin it, now ends ups on depp black list lol, im looking forward to see how amber career is like after this trial now

Are you kidding me? Trees burn one at a time... bumble bumble....bumble bumble...circle with no meaning or ending, complete waste of time.

You don't need to have good analytical skills to understand the difference between causation and correlation, those are the absolute basics...

Bravo.

It was great when she started getting rattled. Her face tightened, she looked angry, she was avoidibg eye contact, started taking more swigs from her bottle.

@@wadewilson8011 😊

@@stompthedragon4010 I know, right?! I think that's how the lawyer, Dennison, made it happen. He took so much time, and he made her nervous and defensive. He did the same with the mental health expert (who was horrible). I wonder if that's Dennison's style. If it's a way of making these witnesses see the mistakes and contradictions in their testimonies and knowledge. I honestly think he's better than the other lawyers on the team, if I can compare. I mean, Vasquez is very reactive, I've noticed. She's quick, but could step up her game if she did more research and took the time to learn the lingo that is used and practiced in these witnesses' fields of profession. I mean, Dennison takes his time and is adorably (and perhaps deceptively bumbling in his speech, like Columbo, I'm tellin ya!), but he KNOWS what he's talking about. He surprises the witnesses with his knowledge. It's so entertaining!!!

I highly doubt the jury will recognise this though

Several of Amber's experts were just downright rude

They also get that crack man testified on court for them . 😂

@@4n4Queen 🤣

This woman was great, she kept coming back to the point even though he tried to derail her. She had clear, consise, fact based answers.

@@mmartin685 She Couldn’t Even Provide A Fact Based Answer Considering Two Simple Words Lol. Stop It

I read period period period 😂

Same here.

Me too. I dislike her because of hearing her on the recordings and then not donating money

Same here!!!

Yup

Saaaame! Had no idea who this Waldman person is and still don’t lmao 🤣

Agree, but the next time there is a fire she should be hired as the expert witness!

Yeah and she gave me a headache 🤦‍♀️

Exactly. She's embarrassing. If I were her, I would have just got up and went home 🤣😂 She awful!

Lol ikr!

Style Columbo 👌 .

@@VIKTOR-ck3dx 🤩

well you got there eventually, pat yourself on the back.

I agree,no smart person would so all the less professional were left...

Most have seen the writing on the wall and dont want to ruin their careers, these experts seem like they would do anything for a quick buck.

Who would want to be associated with her?? The only "experts" that would, are here and they are not the sharpest tools in the drawer... Like common! They all need psychiatric help at some point, or a good cure...

Did you all see how Depp’s witness, Dr. Curry, eviscerated AH’s psychologist expert testimony?

I put some parts on to help me sleep sometimes lol

+she denies that bad press did affect Johnny when it comes to work

💪💩

It was the high point of my day.

I nearly lost it when the lawyer said “Amber turd” and they showed Amber’s face right after. It has to be so embarrassing for her to know that’s going to be on record forever.

@@plvtoisaplanet LOL. Live by the Turd, die by the Turd.

And knows which buttons to push.

Yes he does. He was so good, he had the “expert” flirting with him. “Ohhh you’re a movie fan” and she said a few other things as well. Talk about a smooooooth criminal lol

Well said.

Ya think?

I totally agree!! I have never seen this before!!

Hm

Agree. The vibe of this lady is so off. Not coming across as credible at all . The smarmy smiling gotcha dupers delight is disturbing. Then she snaps back to I’m the expert Queen do not interrupt me. it annoyed me that he let her go on and on but the more she spoke the more she dug a hole. Well done mr Guy / lawyer !

I think this woman is great, she has fact based researched evidence. She's smart, well spoken, and doesn't take crap from the lawyer.

@m martin And doesn't know the difference between correlation and causation. Or she was pretending she didn't so she wouldn't have to answer any truth-revealing questions. Either way, she made herself look very poor as a so-called expert, and further damaged Amber's case -- if it's even possible to damage it more than it already is.

You'd think that, but actually it's spreading the word about how narcissistic, manipulative, abusive and crazy she actually is, so it's not a total waste of time.

Did she have a career though? I didnt even know this terd before all of this.

I wouldn’t trust AH as far as I could throw her 😆 Evil witch & I certainly wouldn’t trust her around a puppy never mind a baby

@@tehmineyalbuzdag2390 😂🤣😂 I know right !

@@jacklow9611 that’s true! I was meaning that her trying to blame Johnny for her losing roles etc was a waste of time cuz we all know it’s not true. Thanks for clarifying though 😊

AH witnesses seem to help JD the most.

Right her claims are so contradictory. She asserts that Johnny's career hasn't been affected by negative press but then goes on and on about how Amber's career has been ruined by bad press. A logical person is able to deduce that its either one or the other, there were be consistency in cause and effect regardless of the individual

Think I recall JD doing the smile / smirk loads when he was on the stand.

That she dissagrees on ,it only works if it is Amber. Apperantly she thinks Johnny is just doing fine and didnt lose anything.

Unfortunately no. The argument isn't that it impacted him negatively, it's whether or not her statements were true. Libel is tricky, the core of it isn't the damage it's the truth of it. (Obviously it's more nuanced though)

@@AB-ty7kh thanks for the clarification

While I agree there’s some major leaps in your logic. Everything really boils down to he said she said in this case, and unfortunately the jurors aren’t aware of the full scope of evidence we are seeing and which has led to an avalanche of support for Depp on social media. That being said Dennison is an excellent attorney and picks this woman’s testimony to shreds. But as to the foundation of the case that really is going to depend on what the jury is seeing and how they interpret it. Could still go either way.

I agree 💯% …

👏👏👏

Say it again for the ppl in the back 👏

Like always the stir is all over ambers lies

👍.

Yessssssssss. I've been saying this from the beginning. She brought it on herself!

But her damage is worse. Right?!

@@wendyhardin5259 how come?

Amber is the cause of her own negative effects, and she is the cause of people viewing Johnny in a negative light as well. She IS the match, not the Waldman Report. She and her lies are the match that started to burn the forest if this so-called expert wants to use that analogy.

@@wendyhardin5259 yes it is worse because of her evil motives and her lies came back to haunt her... whenever you are digging a hole for someone dig one for yourself because the circumstances can backfire especially if the person is telling lies.

Maybe the so called expert can explain the difference between assumptions in predicting losing a million dollars on AQUAMANN and 22 million dollars on pirates of the Caribbean. And how much the next role would bring a real actor, with proven statistics, to better project Johnny Depp's losses directly due to amber herself.

Wayne is awesome, he can break experts. Camille is just ruthless! She's worse than a rottweiller. Haha

Yeah he's the truth.

Yeah he's got a different swag, Camille like Tiger style Wayne's like praying mantis or someshit

@@liamwilkins1332 FUNNY MADE ME LAFF THANKS...

@@liamwilkins1332 👌🏼😅😅😅

Correct

and he wasnt even objected once, hes a pro

Not sure that was a strategy. He stumbles alot on his words and is constantly shaking/trembling. He looks like he has a medical condition.

This is the only witness of Turds that I've actually felt bad for, she should have been hired by Johnny. She's actually very good. One of his tactics is to try to interrupt her, she stands her ground and doesn't let him disrespect her. She's trying to do her job.

Right. You can' t just exclude negative press about tge dog poop just because it is advantageous to Amner' s case, and it didnt come from Waldman

Actually you need to convince the jury not the opposing lawyer,so its kinda common

They’re actually supposed to look at the jury when answering a question, court protocol or something. But I agree, this is tea and they’re guilty in my opinion 🙊

@@sabrinaoviedo6124 depp hardly ever even looked at the jury, I doubt there's a rule about that. It's true , it's an act

It comes off as scripted.

People need to get a clue. Attorneys always ask the people testifying to look at the jury. The questions are being asked for the jury!

Lady at 1:14, I'd kiss her feet

BINGO!

Yes! Can't be a movie without him

I literally couldn't name another one of the characters in those films. Every American I know knows the name "jack sparrow". Johnny Depp IS POTC

@@justincastellanos5647 I still remember Calypso lol

Johnny Depp is the only reason I watched all 5 Pirates of the Caribbean lol

Yeah this lady full of it he is the main character and to say he would not have been in 6 she's full of it without him there is no 6 it wouldn't even look right to put another in his place but you know some must find things out the hard way now don't they.

And Dumber…

@@jamesaubrey2793 indeed

The idea of a expert social media analyst is utter nonsense anyway

Yeah, that made my face contort a bit. As my parents' generation would say, "Yikes!"

Yeah I'm confused by the start where she seems to say that she considered anything after the statements and anything caused by the statements to be the same thing.

Not for an expert witness actually. Hearsay doesn't have the same rules for expert witnesses as it does for the normal witnesses

I watched the whole cross examination, she was definitely having a field day feeling smug and dare I say even sneering at him, he kept his cool though and towards the end if you observe closely she became more serious, because he was going in with those questions..lol

@@iiAIDANii1 Aaaaaah ok, that makes sense. Thank you for the clarification and for doing it with class :) Most people on social media only attack people that ask questions

@@J-Tex-Corporation lol ikr, that never made sense to me

Yes. But he doesn’t care as the lawyer knows he can use that in his favor. They only call objection if it’s on their favor.

The audio was allegedly leaked by Mr. Waldman ,and now the world can say that Amber was a hoax and a liar..She ruined and damaged herself...

Same

Me either. If that is all they have to argue with and if that’s why they’re suing DEPP, then they’re dead in the water.

Same

Me too! I didn't know about Waldman and I've been a JD supporter since she first made these accusations!

Also known as subjective analogy.

This case has so far been nothing but hype and subjective assertions presented as fact. There is nothing quantitative or objective from AH's side particularly. Haven't seen many JD witnesses. All the people I've seen in court are parasites.

Does she not think that screwed herself in her career. You bad mouth someone who is more famous than you, of course his fans will back him and tell producers hire her and we will boycott your movie. How is that Johnny's fault.

Yeah. I get this strange astrology-vibe from her reasoning. The voodoo on this one is strong.

Yes. I hope the jury see it this way

He is suing her.

How do you know all of this? Do you take time out to eat?

@@binab4784 and she is countersuing

Yeah and she does all this to cover up her physically abusing Depp, that's the root of this

Exactly that!

Kinda. She can say it but he can basically make her stop talking by continuing and if she doesn't the judge will make her. But my personal belief, he lets her act that way. He wants Ambers defense to think they are in charge so they get these big egos which helps him in the end.

And she calls them semantics not a very bright person !!

I’m sure her full time job😉 she might be an expert.

She's an absolute fool

Right. That's literally what she was hired for

Glorified daddy's girl who got her job because of silicon Valley and connections. She's reminds me of a local dollar general clerk, but in better clothes 🤣