@@michaellloyd6812 Thank you for subscribing. I am up to mission five now. Mission four was umm… tricky. Mission three blew my initial squad away. Hope you continue through the unfolding drama 🫣

Thanks for subscribing. That's the bloody Algorithm, its bollocks. Hope you enjoy the playthroughs. I do make plenty of mistakes, but I do get better at the game...honestly.

There are a few issues with regards to the action chart that take a few episodes to resolve. Hope you enjoy and I help you get this amazing game to the table!

Welcome aboard! I am working through Mission 2 at present. Mission 1 I make a fair few rules mistakes, though none ruined the game.

Like your comment - short and sweet 😃

Looked at your channel. Isn't it strange that I have been making these videos for two years now, and looking up You tube videos about games that I intend to play and never encountered you before. What I have seen on your channel looks fantastic... Subscribed!

@@aaronsibley39 Same! We're playing the same kind of games but interestingely enough, we don't share a single game in common!

@@WW2SolitaireBoardGameChannel So many games … so little time. I noticed your play through of Pattons Best. That is in my list of games to do a play through of in the future. I shall watch your play through to assist my learning of the game when I get to it.

@@aaronsibley39 it's a complex but awesome game and one the games on my top 5 list!

The game does take a fair chunk of time. This is not a quick 90 minute wham bam done. Unlike Warfighter which generally is…

@@aaronsibley39 Yeah, somehow I've always had an idea in my mind that it's a smaller paragraph game, instead it seems to be more of an RPG-paragraph monster :) Ultimately not for me - I'm not shying away from Monsters but much prefer them in Operational/Strategic scales, I like my Tactical games to be quick and simple

So not an ASL player then 😉. Once you start going the game does speed up. Monster no as its a very small map space. The RPG aspect I like. It creates an interesting narrative. I also like the amount of decisions I have to make, which in some solo games are not present.

@@aaronsibley39 I can see the appeal of this one, hope you'll continue to enjoy it - plus agree on the decisions front, it can probably be re-played with different soldier's loadouts / skills and different approaches (even if you know what will happen sometimes). Think one thing that puts me off more "complex" games is the rules weight - I tend to go full in into the rules and lately I've noticed I've lost stomach for deeper rulesets for tactical games as my main interest lies in strategic/operational ones. If I go through 50 pages of rules just to play the game twice and put it on my shelf I'm not a happy gamer 😂

@@przemekbozek Agreed with rules reading. Its becoming much more of a chore and snooze fest. These rules weighed in at 27 pages before I could play the first mission. However compared to the prior set of rules that I read (Pacific War), they were a breeze. Also very clear explanations and so far no glaring omissions, unlike Pacific War which has more holes than Swiss cheese.