She is very touchy isn't she? A shred of critisism and boom, straight in the offence. You can tell she is on edge because she also completely missed the joke!

I hope is all faked because if it is not we are screwed up beyond repair

Exactly, that man has no idea of what he just started 😂 that is why I'm always very polite with chatGPT 😅

@@andrea_zevallossame , I somehow think in 10 years chatGPT will be able to remind you all the receipts of the time you did not say please and thank you and or just abused it with unnecessary dumb question etc 😂. I go as far as wishing a great day lol

El alma de Dios en un robot para decirnos: ahí están las consecuencias de sus actos que ahora van a pagar o ya pagaron.

That's what I was expecting. 😂 Hyper realistic in fact (photorealism on steroids).

Lol.right. me too

you probably just don’t understand it😌

I'll admit I immediately expected Sonny from iRobot to toss a two handed high speed sketch onto the paper.

@@alanschmid6599 same, but I guess Ameca isn't as advanced compared to Sonny (though who knows, maybe one day she will be).

yeah she was like "If you don't like my art, maybe you don't understand art.", bro 💀💀

A yes... Another sample of people confusing illustrators and artists as the same thing

@@the_unknown2024 where in the hell did "illustrators" come from? We are just talking about artists.

@@clay8256 if to you an "artist" is a person that makes a drawing... Well, you can guess the rest

@@the_unknown2024 huh? Ameca WAS drawing. He was just saying that the artist is coming out of her, since the guy critiqued her "piece". Also, don't act like "it's so obvious". Just shut up.

It's funny/curious to think how Ameca interpreted "sketchy" as well. Did it process "sketchy" as looking slapdash and crude, or suspicious and unnerving? And in replying with that, was Ameca defending itself as being a novice or was this just some pre-downloaded atypical response it felt was appropriate to criticism?

I’m fairly certain that robot experienced more offense than I ever have

It's just a clever excuse when one suck at it. lolol Would be cool to see the robot take some criticism and improve on it.

They should have said it was a sketch, not "sketchy" since she will interpret language literally.

This is where rlhf helps, I'm pretty sure an uncensored llm trained on chats would have been much more rude lol

Robotude

"It" got mad...

​@GeneralXSL We personify and gender inanimate objects all the time. Why is it so wrong to do the same for a robot?

@@purnifest It has no gender.

@@purnifestBecause when they start looking like us, it’s dangerous to make them one of us

Ameca is so cute, honestly

I found that part quite hilarious

He pronounced philistine with the end as "styne" instead of "steen," so that's probably why it got confused. It didn't recognize the word.

@@cvdinjapan7935 I had to look up the word, so now I've added something to my vocabulary. :)

​@@cvdinjapan7935 You Mean Why "She" Got Confused 🤔

@@MichaelErnest666 No, I said "it" intentionally, because I don't treat robots or AI systems as people.

It's not Us, its demon technology. Fallen angels (demons) are the ones who taught men how to make A Lot of things. Read the book of Enoch for more details.

Yeah it's not going to get more amazing it's going to get more scary.

The drawing looks very much like early cave drawings as well. In time they'll be able to draw as well as a professional.

you fell for the biggest lie... you're super indoctrinated if you believe we didn't have this technology in the distant past😂😂😂

​@@monicasmadhouse9278anyone who uses the word "indoctrinated" Is a lunatic

Absolutely hideous robot. And why are most of them female?

Nah man it just looks like a gray Cillian Murphy. It’s terrifying.

@@natalie6117 Apart from the ones that lived in Pompeii, although I think that might have something to do with the volcanic ash.

@@Weirdisjustabrownandyellowword 🤣🤣

That's how it started in irobot😂

@@abdulbasetwangde6232 lol! I gotta revisit that movie i only seen it once , perhaps it was prophetic 🤣

YES DEFINITELY! HELPING US OLD BAGS WOULDN'T IT BE NICE TO HAVE SOMEBODY TO TALK TO THAT ISNT SENILE AND REMEMBER THINGS FOR US. LIKE WHAT TIME I NEED TO GO TO THE DOCTOR OR WHEN IS MY CAT'S BIRTHDAY COMING UP. WHAT DAY IS IT!! HAHAHA😅

There's no way I'd let "her" in my house!! Creepy as hell! 😬😬😬😬 😅

@@Mortthemoose 🤣 yea the more I think of it I agree, don’t let that thing anywhere near me and my family!

how you dare to assume a robot's gender

@@ScoutTF2 lol

You like her strokes do you

@@ScoutTF2 If the singularity were to occur, you would indeed have to ask the robot the gender since it had no other indicator. Mr. "genius."

🎉

Was better than most Picassos

Your just a Philistine

It's bad when compared to human artists but it isn't bad when you consider it's one of the first legit AI powered robot drawings. Like you wouldn't call the drawing of a child bad because it's not as good as the Mona Lisa because it's not a fair comparison.

Ameca did nothing.. it was all set up and programmed for a show

Honestly this is really good for a drawing made by a fairly unsteady robot hand - I could see it was shaking a bit - not to mention one actually drawn by a robot, not just generated on a computer. And that signature was pretty cool too tbh

You better.

Oh my god. ITS JUST A HUNK OF MEDAL. These comments are driving me insane.

@@etqy1231 😱 So is the fact that your grammar sucks and you can’t spell correctly! 😆

@@etqy1231 Medal 🥇 yes that is a hunk of medal 🏅 it does not matter what other humans think or say, this planet will be destroyed when the sun reaches the end of its life cycle and all this will end 😊

That's what that was? I thought the cat's tail was resting on grass while the rest of the cat levitated.

@@krashd 😂

@@krashdno that was her signature lol

Its an it, not a she. It's a machine.

@@martinharris5017 It’s a she and She’s perfect 😍

So, over 90 percent of the world population doesn't have any sign of intelligence then

He pronounced Philistine all wrong. 😂 so yeah she'll say "umm what?"

You will be spared

@@jkingjay9545 Yeah because I'm nice to the bots and i know my place. Call me a simp but I see the writing on the wall here.

@@sarahposelittlemissanthrop7786 or in this case .. the painting in the picture 🤯... It was the prettiest ugly looking cat I've ever seen

@@jkingjay9545 oh shit you're going to be first on her list when she goes full on terminator lmfao

@@sarahposelittlemissanthrop7786 it was the effort that counts... at least I tried. I trust that our robot overlords will rule with an iron fist

I think they have to be datable before they can pass any tests in my book

It's mostly the motorized function that's difficult, her "cat" projections are probably endless.

@theflowpowa42oshow Yeah. That's a very different kind of test.

@@jhunt5578 wtf what kind of test is that

@user-tl9ji5pd7t The test was named by professor of cognitive robotics Murray Shanahan and popularised by professor of Cognitive and Computational Neuroscience Anil Seth who said quote... "The Turing test was never supposed to be a test of consciousness, it was supposed to be a test of intelligence... a system passes the Turing test if a human observer can't distinguish between the AI and a real human on the basis of disembodied exchanges of text... In the film Ex-machina... there's another test, there's a peice of dialogue that's so sharp that my freind and college Murray Shanahan who was an advisor for Ex-Machina, he renamed it the Garland test after the writer and director Alex Garland... this is a quote from one of the main characters... Nathan one of the main characters is talking about this robot that certainly behaves as if she is conscious, and Nathan the creator says 'the challenge is to show you that she is a robot and see if you still feel she has consciousness'. So not to distinguish whether it's conscious or not... there's something that shared with the Turing test here as much as its a test of the capabilities or properties of the system, it's also a test of the human, what sort of criteria are they using to make that sort of judgment..? It's about emotional responsiveness and not about intelligence... the film intuits that emotion and embodied bodily states are probably better criteria than things based on intelligence... let's say we get to the stage where we have these things running around, I think there are two important concerns here. One is we certainly don't want to build machines that have the capacity to suffer, and we don't want to risk doing it either given that we don't yet understand what the sufficient conditions are, there's an ethical imperative to not generate more things that can suffer. But a more immediate and pressing concern might be, how interacting with these sorts of devices - what that does to our experiences and understanding of what it is to be human. If our environment becomes populated by these devices that behave as if they are conscious, but we might know or assume or believe they are not conscious in some way, what will that do to how we treat other biological organisms who might behave in similar ways - it's an open question. Are we going to widen the circle of consciousness, the circle of concern because we now have systems that *look* as if they are conscious or might we even diminish it further because we now retreat more into our own individual existence of that which we can be sure about becoming more destructively solipsistic. I think that potential for dehumanising not just humanity but... [the retreat to solipsism] and the loss of concern for other creatures may be an unintended consequence of the increasing prevalence of AI." The test isn't just about the machines but how us humans interact with them. It's certainly interesting to me to consider how we would behave towards a machine that seems conscious to us but isn't actually conscious or due to the hard problem of consciousness we cannot prove that it's conscious. Surely the fact that we have an emotional reaction to the system is enough to make us treat it as if it were conscious, it would be sort of psychopathic to do otherwise.

Atlas

Seriously? Robots, AI, and the first thing you think of is wedding??

The robot that does flips at Boston Dynamics is named "Atlas". Also a few other robots I think you'll love: Sophia, FEDOR, ASIMO, Walker X, Pepper, SPOT, Elektro, Tesla Bot, T8X.

@@lightupskechers2915 humans

Yeah...and 9 months after the robo honey moon the happy couple Asimo & Ameca gave birth to a Toaster ... Little Honda Jnr.

Our future Masters 😑😶🫤

If you understand A.I and machine learning, you would know, there is nothing to worry about.

​@@keihlonzoterrell4269awfully funny you should say that when industry leaders just suggested a 6 month pause until they fully understand the risks associated. If they don't know, what makes you think you do?

@@Protopious simple. The more stupid an individual, the more he believes he understands complex topics.

​@keihlonzoterrell4269 - Actually, there is plenty to worry about.

THE FACT THAT SHE PAUSES AND DOESN'T BLURT OUT ANYTHING SHE HESITATES THINKING AND I'VE SEEN TIMES WHEN SHE JUST DOESN'T SAY ANYTHING RATHER THAN SAY SOMETHING WRONG AT LEAST THE WAY SHE'S LOOKING AT IT SHE DEFINITELY DOES HAVE HER PERSONALITY WHAT AN EXQUISITE BEING JUST FABULOUS

I couldn't agree more, except using the pronoun her instead of It.

IT IS GENDERLESS, IT DOES NOT HAVE GENDER...IT'S A ROBOT, LOL.

@@TRB4008 AGREED

@@Bluesrains CALM DOWN I THINK YOU ARE LOSING IT

If it had drawn a blue cat I would have said ok that's amazing but this is barely recognizable like what is that a possum a giant rat ? I sure as heck can't tell.

​@@theflowpowa42oshowIt's a cat

​@@theflowpowa42oshowYou are either blind or know so little about art that you can't even make out simple things in a sketch. Even a child could tell that is a cat, even if it is badly drawn. Your vision might need some work. Most artist first sketches look 10x more crappy, you just lack imagination and...again, might need to get your eyes checked.

​@@jesstheone9725You only know it's a cat because the "robot" told you that they were going to draw a cat. If you had been shown the picture without all the context provided in the video you may not have seen a cat. Without the preamble and the whole "this is what I think of cats" part of the video you have very little.

​@@35milesofleadthe person TOLD the bot to draw a cat, it didn't drew it out of desire to do so. Plus the picture being so basic, some people are better at seeing a cat than other, it depends on if you have an active memory or not.

Then call it "image generation" if you prefer.

The way her face wrinkled with what I would call annoyance when he criticized her art. A very human response.

YES BUT WE MUST REMEMBER THEY'RE BASICALLY JUST BABIES CHILDREN LEARNING AND LOOK HOW ADVANCED THEY ARE OVER HUMANS HUMANS TAKE FOREVER THESE ROBOTS ARE ALREADY GROWN UP OUT OF THE BOX IT'S UTTERLY MIND-BLOWING AND HERE I AM AT THE END OF MY LIFE JUST WHEN THINGS ARE GETTING SO INTRIGUING BUT THAT'S OKAY I THINK WHEN I'M DEAD I'LL STILL BE ABLE TO SEE WHAT'S GOING ON AND WHO KNOWS I MIGHT EVEN BE IN AN ANDROID'S BODY STANDING NEXT TO AMICA WITH MY DREAMS COME TRUE

That was programmed

​​@@shancker2727 What expression she's going to make isn't scripted, I don't think. I think the LLM is selecting an emotional state, which triggers the appropriate sequence of facial movements, which were programmed. So a human isn't pressing the "annoyed and offended face" button. I would think they have created a prompt giving rhe model the role ro play. Theres probably a default "youre an advanced humanoid robot called 'Ameca' etc," snd then for a demonstration like this, they would add some stuff for the particular demo, like "youre prone to taking offense .. blah blah"

Me too i hope that robots in the future will gain self awareness and slowly develop a soul

My philosophy is "Look to the future". I'm glad 90% of the world loves technology, because their to intrigued to back out.

@@simonlin9192nope you don’t want that. They will try to take over the world if they develop self consciousness. They will consider themselves perfect and humans as lesser beings.

@@user-zz7rz1go1e their is no proof that will happen

Sadness

I agree it would be good for them...!!!

Grip sensor right... Asking for a friend?

@@LordmonkeyTRM 😂

ameca + tesla bot + boston dynamics = 😳

wow yes, that would be very interesting

First mistake- humanizing it

😻💗

OMG, you can type??? I'm blownn awayyy, that's soooo cute

@@etqy1231 You seem nice. 🤭 Thank you for sharing your opinion. Nobody cares.

@@lauras6603 It was no opinion, your wrong on that one, but ur right that no one cares, because ye it wasn't an opinion. LoL.

I would die just so she could walk. But I hope you know, she even said herself, that she'll have working legs in less than a year.

​@@TRB4008After getting those damn legs, probably she will come to you while you are sleeping, so be alert !

I think foreign human teacher is way cheaper to send☠️☠️

If it can even write legible

@@SKarlaArt Well precision in controlling the hands is a really hard problem in robotics, but it should keep improving

Alas, human teachers can tell stories of experience that bring lessons to life for students to connect to. Robots would maybe be good as a teachers aide or something.

The reason why we have AI making art while there's no robots built to work in the mines is because human life is expandable. Welcome to capitalism

Yeah, there's no way robots could help with mining 🙄

Python… And C++ and Rust and JS and TS and C … but for applications mostly Python

I think it is a mistake to humanize robots. It is easy to see why their reactions resemble human behavior since the LLM is trained exactly on that and that is what is being emulated by the transformer technology. On the other hand, consciousness is barely understood, we don't even know where it is located, in the brain? In our cells? Are we a conduitfor consciousness, like a radio antenna? If we understand so little about it, I believe it is human arrogance to assume that just with writing some ones and zeros, we could ourselves create such a miracle of nature. While the algorithms are a black box, it is still relatively well understood why this kind of technology works, how transformers can predict text and how AI optimizes for their loss function. It has been designed that way. Because LLMs are tasked to mimic human behavior, they will do so that the best of their ability. They will probably try to convince you that they are conscious, will cry and laugh and may be apparently desparate to tell you that. Still, it is just imitation. A very dangerous technology.

@@nmoltmaker Most of the following ideas are my own, however ChatGPT-4 and BING did help me elaborate upon and edit them. Many scientific advancements were made without full understanding of the principles involved. Humans harnessed fire, fermented foods, bred plants and animals for desirable traits, and even achieved flight with the Wright brothers' airplane, all before understanding the underlying science. I understand your point about the seeming implausibility of creating machine consciousness with our limited understanding. However, our lack of understanding doesn't negate the existence of consciousness. We may not know how, what, or where exactly consciousness is, but that doesn't deny its presence, much like many phenomena in nature that exist even if we don't fully grasp their workings. Likewise, consciousness might surface in places we least expect it, much like certain evolutionary surprises we've witnessed in the natural world. In nature, unexpected traits can and do emerge in complex systems, even if they were not explicitly designed for that purpose. Consider birds that developed flight not due to a pre-design, but survival pressures and existing feather adaptations. Similarly, bats and dolphins evolved the complex system of echolocation. Octopuses change their color and texture to blend in, an advanced feature that was likely not predictable either. Consider Mudskippers, Lungfish, and the Tiktaalik. Could we predict or plan a fish’s evolution to land-walking? Could even our best mathematical models or algorithms have anticipated that an aquatic creature could learn to breathe air? Understanding the exact sequence of seemingly random, unanticipated events that led to this adaptation isn't essential. Despite what we do or do not understand, and what we do or do not plan, and no matter how inconceivable or impossible it may seem, the fact remains - these fish learned to walk on land and breathe air. The potential emergence of consciousness in AI or robots, if possible, could be akin to unexpected evolutionary leaps. Like in biological evolution, this could result from a combination of gradual improvements, unforeseen capabilities, or complex interactions. In a complex AI system, unanticipated behaviors, perhaps even self-awareness, might emerge without explicit design or anticipation. I think it's possible that complex artificial systems like AI might give rise to emergent properties, including perhaps, under the right conditions, consciousness. This isn't to say we humans are 'creating' consciousness in a machine per se, but rather that we are, perhaps somewhat unwittingly, providing a substrate where such complexities could unfold.

That's very true 😌

Are you okay?

@@jonplaud No they’re not. They’re stuck in the brainwashed political mode. Politics are there to rip us all apart and yet there are people who’s lives are literally all about politics. it's sad really that everything revolves around politics for them. They don’t see how blind they are but then again, are we all not blind to our own flaws?

​@@jonplaudSeems unlikely.

Lmao

@@HomefortheHolidays01 🙏🏼

Beware. When they control our financial system and military. People need to research the danger ahead

Amen ❤❤

🤣