America's Rapid Dragon Missile Goes Hard

  Рет қаралды 509,980

Task & Purpose

Task & Purpose

4 күн бұрын

Sign up for a 14-day free trial and enjoy all the amazing features MyHeritage has to offer bit.ly/TaskandPurpose
The United States Air Force new Rapid Dragon Missile fires 45 missiels from a pallet. C-130 or C-17 and even the C-5 can fire these off. There are even hypersonic missile versions in the works. Its job is to suppress any air defense systems like the S-300 or S-400 or even the S-500. Logistics now has teeth. Cargo planes will now be able to fire 45 AGM cruise missiles.
Air Force Institute of Technology Gurler Ari Thesis Paper:
scholar.afit.edu/cgi/viewcont...
Join the T&P discord Server / discord
merch: task-purpose-shop.fourthwall....
/ cappyarmy
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @taskandpurpose
Written by: Chris Cappy & Justin Taylor
Edited by: Savvy Studios
Task & Purpose is a military news and culture oriented channel. We want to foster discussion about the defense industry.
Email capelluto@taskandpurpose.com for inquires.

Пікірлер: 1 600
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 3 күн бұрын
Sign up for a 14-day free trial and enjoy all the amazing features MyHeritage has to offer bit.ly/TaskandPurpose
@V.B.Squire
@V.B.Squire 3 күн бұрын
You didn't mention incorporating rapid dragon into spectre gunship fleet which is also c-130 & if possible would de conflict the burden on cargo fleet
@deek1081
@deek1081 3 күн бұрын
11:40 what is that background noise
@krisfrederick5001
@krisfrederick5001 3 күн бұрын
"If you screw up…, you'll be flying a cargo plane full of rubber dog shi* out of Hong Kong". -Top Gun
@MrWezzell
@MrWezzell 3 күн бұрын
Don't knock yourself so much, Airforce and Army both have a 31 minimum ASVB.
@Bones-uu6zp
@Bones-uu6zp 3 күн бұрын
HEY, SPEAKING OF BURRITOS MY FRIEND, YOUR A GENIUS ! THEY CAN DELIVER FOOD AND MEDICAL SUPPLIES ALL ACROSS NEEDED REGIONS RAPIDLY NOW, CALL IT RAPID-GRUB-ON AND DRINKS RAPID-FLAGON. - I THINK YOU NEED TO CALL THE SOC AND REFER ME INTO THEIR THINK TANKS. ✅😎👍
@justevil100
@justevil100 3 күн бұрын
Naming a new weapon after a historical one from an adversary is likely to be used on is peak American.
@thespalek1
@thespalek1 3 күн бұрын
Trolling at it's finest😁
@NoobTamer
@NoobTamer 2 күн бұрын
Considering that dragons are included in nearly every mythology from around the world, I don't feel like the name was directed at them specifically. Cool post-hoc reasoning though. Edit: I stand corrected, just got to the part in the video where it explains the name.
@mp-hk6ln
@mp-hk6ln 2 күн бұрын
I mean if you know your history it would pay mortgage to their close ally taiwan too which consider themselves the rightful title of China
@Knuck_Knucks
@Knuck_Knucks 2 күн бұрын
@@thespalek1 I was going to say "Cultural Appropriation' 🐉 . 🐿
@JohnJaneson
@JohnJaneson 2 күн бұрын
We apply Sun Tzu better than they do. And the CCP hate traditional Chinese culture anyway.
@sonofjack6286
@sonofjack6286 3 күн бұрын
British: Who measures nuclear bombs by the pallet? USA: Me.
@GameFuMaster
@GameFuMaster 3 күн бұрын
the us will measure things in anything but metric
@tacticalbutler1556
@tacticalbutler1556 2 күн бұрын
🤣
@willpugh8865
@willpugh8865 2 күн бұрын
@@GameFuMasterlol so true even though technically the US government is metric believe it or not
@GameFuMaster
@GameFuMaster 2 күн бұрын
@@willpugh8865 yes, the legal inch is defined by a metric value
@glennchartrand5411
@glennchartrand5411 2 күн бұрын
We've been using the metric system to define all of our measurements since 1832
@AgentX2006
@AgentX2006 3 күн бұрын
Just for point of reference 288 Tomahawk cruise missiles were launched during Operation Desert Storm in 1991. 10 dedicated C-17s can launch 450 AGM-158s. They could theoretically use something like 50 cargo planes to launch well over a thousand of these within minutes completely overwhelming and destroying any and all air defenses a hostile nation may have. In a near peer fight this system is practically an "I win" button.
@196cupcake
@196cupcake 3 күн бұрын
Range of the missiles when air dropped like that, and the potential for stealthy enemy fighters would be my concern.
@TheTraktor01
@TheTraktor01 3 күн бұрын
@@196cupcake yes, but if its how you start the war, no one questions 50 cargoplanes scattered 500 miles from their border
@bogdanovist
@bogdanovist 3 күн бұрын
What is the size of the stockpile though? I don't think that many missiles actually exist, certainly not multiple missions of that scales worth.
@mso82
@mso82 3 күн бұрын
@@bogdanovist He mentions in the video that the US alone has 7,500 JASM cruise missiles on hand and just placed an order for another 525. That's not including the missiles currently stockpiled by our allies, like Poland, Japan, Finland and others.
@terryfaugno9242
@terryfaugno9242 3 күн бұрын
@@196cupcake Said C-17s would most definitely be flying with F-35/F-22 escorts to interdict just such a threat.
@scotts918
@scotts918 3 күн бұрын
Enemy: Hah! It is only a C130 😂 C130: *Begins pooping pallets of missiles*
@legionx4046
@legionx4046 2 күн бұрын
From 600 miles away😂
@TheBlackToedOne
@TheBlackToedOne 2 күн бұрын
Don't forget about the 130s they call Puff the Magic Dragon. That can mess up someone's day, too.
@r7calvin
@r7calvin 2 күн бұрын
​​@@TheBlackToedOne what a difference that "A" prefix makes...
@ryanjohnson628
@ryanjohnson628 Күн бұрын
@@r7calvinit’s just one letter. How big of a difference can it possibly make? 😂😂😂😂
@Sacred_l0g1x
@Sacred_l0g1x Күн бұрын
they wet their pants in the first place when it is a C130 SPECTRE/SPOOKY kekw
@alexanderfenn4457
@alexanderfenn4457 3 күн бұрын
Really making the PLA go from "Hah! It's just a C17!" to "Fuck! IT'S A C-17!"
@smoketinytom
@smoketinytom 3 күн бұрын
Disguised as a Civilian Airliner with a transponder... :D
@331SVTCobra
@331SVTCobra 3 күн бұрын
That's the PLAN. (Do you see what I did there?)
@johnronellequinones4819
@johnronellequinones4819 3 күн бұрын
​@@smoketinytom pretty sure that's a war crime. I remember hearing a us destroyer shot down a civ airliner because someone pulled this shit up.
@smoketinytom
@smoketinytom 3 күн бұрын
@@johnronellequinones4819 Technically it's a form of camouflage. And it's not using a protected symbol like the Red Cross or Red Crescent to transport military hardware or as offensive weapons platforms.
@3s0t3r1c
@3s0t3r1c 3 күн бұрын
​@@johnronellequinones4819 Disguising Military Equipment As Civilian Objects is not a war crime.
@AlexLee-dc2vb
@AlexLee-dc2vb 3 күн бұрын
Rapid Dragon is unironically the US’ most promising development to ensure the protection of Taiwan. We aren’t building enough submarines, destroyers, bombers, or fighters to pick up the slack.
@Alejandra-cv7rj
@Alejandra-cv7rj 3 күн бұрын
We got old ships pre 1990s sitting in storage if we go to war it's likely those ships will be put back into service
@TheJttv
@TheJttv 3 күн бұрын
​@@Alejandra-cv7rj easier said then done
@MicroSBs
@MicroSBs 3 күн бұрын
@@Alejandra-cv7rj nah no way. Some of these ships needs hundreds of millions of dollars in upgrades and its harder in many cases to do these than it is to make a new ship. We also dont have a lot of those 1990s ships right now you can go look at the backup fleets they are quite reduced in size.
@friendlyroughai3319
@friendlyroughai3319 3 күн бұрын
promising programs until you realize that didn't have stealth tech, slow and can easily be shoot with low cost missile.
@DantheManMonty
@DantheManMonty 3 күн бұрын
America won't come to the rescue of Taiwan, I bet you five bucks.
@TheVirtuoso883
@TheVirtuoso883 3 күн бұрын
"Hey gary what cargo did we just drop again" "MRE's for the ground assets bob why" "Gary why are those MRE's exploding"
@attilaabonyi8879
@attilaabonyi8879 3 күн бұрын
"Oh no..." "Oh no" "Oh yeah!"
@gikigill788
@gikigill788 2 күн бұрын
Hunger is not going to be a problem any more for the enemy troops.
@dennis2376
@dennis2376 2 күн бұрын
😂
@DrownedInExile
@DrownedInExile 2 күн бұрын
"Colonel! What if the enemy got their hands on this food?" "We'd win the war!" - MASH
@b.thomas8926
@b.thomas8926 3 күн бұрын
The other reason why they canceled the 747 idea was that it was felt that weaponizing civilian type aircraft might have a negative effect on commercial air travel. Korean Airlines 747 was shot down in 1983 by the soviets and it kind of spooked everyone.
@Metapharsical
@Metapharsical 3 күн бұрын
Oh it's about to get a whole lot more chaotic- when China rolls out their stated plans for sea-launched missiles disguised as Cargo boxes on commercial shipping vessels
@nuadarstark
@nuadarstark 3 күн бұрын
You can bet someone is still mulling over that idea as a contingency in case NATO looses a significant portion of the cargo and bomber fleets. Commandeering some civilian planes in a clutch moment of a conflict-gone-bad to weaponize them is for sure on the menu.
@jonahkolell
@jonahkolell 3 күн бұрын
Now it will just be used to stoke the fires of war and propaganda. They shot down a civilian plane....
@charleswomack2166
@charleswomack2166 3 күн бұрын
That was the work of Kim Jong-il who was at the time not yet in charge. Even though the Russians actually carried out this mission for him.
@mr2922
@mr2922 3 күн бұрын
We changed our refueling planes to modified commercial airliners, so I'm not sure your statement is still the military viewpoint.
@Marbeary
@Marbeary 3 күн бұрын
Trebuchet, Fire arrows, Crossbow, axes and Rapid Dragon . Nostalgia arc of the miliary is now in full swing.
@Dr.Kananga
@Dr.Kananga 3 күн бұрын
Prostagma?
@linguist8623
@linguist8623 3 күн бұрын
Civ VI too.
@SIR_RR
@SIR_RR 3 күн бұрын
The bible was right all along,
@IcicleFerret
@IcicleFerret 2 күн бұрын
A good design is ageless.
@captainmaim
@captainmaim 2 күн бұрын
Phalanx
@seanedwards7047
@seanedwards7047 3 күн бұрын
The C-130 is an awesome platform. Still flying 60+ years later. This weapon is perfect for C-130s.
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 3 күн бұрын
it's a ride you really feel haha. I've had the pleasure of riding in a blackhawk, chinook, C-130, and C-17 . I forget if we took a C-5 or a C-17 from the United States into Kuwait though. All I can say is the C-130 was the most expierence of the airplanes. loud as fuck, bumpy. freezing if I remember right it was like 10 years ago. I felt like I WAS cargo. puts a smile on your face though.
@FadedEbony
@FadedEbony 3 күн бұрын
The AC-130 has the griffin system that launches hellfires which is more suited for its purpose (CAS in uncontested air space)
@Dfthg-bz3hp
@Dfthg-bz3hp 3 күн бұрын
​@@Taskandpurpose the most precious of cargos 🥺❤️
@lordlemmy5108
@lordlemmy5108 3 күн бұрын
Wonder how long til USMC buy some kc390
@markmitchell457
@markmitchell457 3 күн бұрын
We are still making new C-130s. I think it's the J/J model. It's a good design.
@LacyFacey
@LacyFacey 3 күн бұрын
I love at the end he shows a logistics truck that was used as the base for a HIMARS while saying "Maybe someday they will figure out how to turn a logi truck into a missile system"
@Kevo105
@Kevo105 2 күн бұрын
And the truck based LRHW
@AflacMan13
@AflacMan13 Күн бұрын
Rheinmetal just built a cargo container baser Kamikaze Drone system, in a VLS style launcher, that can fling 126 explosive drones in a drone swarm of 10 pound warheads. 😅😅😅
@willpugh8865
@willpugh8865 2 күн бұрын
People don’t realize the real power behind the US military is the pallet. Absolutely everything they use can be palletized stacked and shipped then unpacked in extremely efficient and effective manner. The logistics behind of their operations is literally mind boggling. No one can even compare to that capability.
@davidty2006
@davidty2006 2 күн бұрын
who knew putting boxes on a few wooden planks and shoving em inside a bigger box is a great way to move stuff.
@TheLiamster
@TheLiamster Күн бұрын
It’s a similar story when it comes to twenty foot containers
@PhilipEason
@PhilipEason Күн бұрын
The real power of the US military is delusion to hear you tell it. The US logistics are not one iota better than the next country's. Any kind of system deployed from a cargo plane is obviously not remotely survivable against modern air defense.
@Less_Serious
@Less_Serious 2 күн бұрын
11:00 "Because they can't just write off a C-130 as a non threat, like they normally do" C-130 Gunship: Am I a joke to you?
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 2 күн бұрын
Fair play
@williamyoung9401
@williamyoung9401 2 күн бұрын
This is actually an ingenious strategy by the USAF. Declassified documents show that China accepts they can't shoot down advanced stealth aircraft like the B-2 Bomber or the F-35. So the Chinese strategy has turned from shooting down those advanced jets to shooting down the vulnerable refueling aircraft.
@MoGumbo_
@MoGumbo_ Күн бұрын
@@williamyoung9401 where'd you get this info? curious to read up ion this leak
@Evinthal84
@Evinthal84 16 сағат бұрын
@@MoGumbo_ It isn't even really a matter of declassified documents saying it. It is one thing to be able to detect a stealth aircraft, it is entirely another thing to be able to shoot one down, as a lot of things have to go right in order to complete the kill chain on them. It is much much much easier to get a kill chain on a tanker.
@emilchan5379
@emilchan5379 7 сағат бұрын
@@MoGumbo_ Not sure about the "can't shoot down advanced stealth aircraft" part, but you can get a good sense of China's strategy simply by looking at the design of the J-20. Compared with the F-22 and F-35, the J-20 is a much larger aircraft with longer operational range and a big weapons bay with space to accommodate space for larger, longer ranged but less agile missiles. In terms of stealth, the J-20 is stealthy from the front, but much less stealthy at other angles due to its canards. Put this info together and you can see its role - to target vulnerable aircraft like AWACS and refuellers from long range, not go up against advanced stealth aircraft like the F-35.
@Dingodile1997
@Dingodile1997 3 күн бұрын
Dragons Breath has a whole new meaning now
@NET-POSITIVE
@NET-POSITIVE 3 күн бұрын
Those cruise missles have the ability to fly low and hug the terrain, and that complicates anti-missle battery tracking. Also the s300 and s400 missles are not designed for low altitude counter missle applications, add the stealth signature the size of a walnut exponentially increase the ability for rapid dragon to have a 95% hit probability.
@swunt10
@swunt10 3 күн бұрын
Gepard shot down russian cruise missiles in ukraine no problem. If the chinese or russians can copy the 40 year old Gepard tech (reliable, quick and easy to use) then cruise missiles are ineffective. Basically every system that is in development or procurement right now to counter the drone menace will likely be able to shot down cruise missiles flying low overhead. Everyone will plaster infrastructure and military assets with anti drone defenses in the future, no doubt.
@mrwhips3623
@mrwhips3623 3 күн бұрын
they'd get jammed🤡 Ww3 won't be desert storm so stop masterbating 🤡
@FarmerDrew
@FarmerDrew 3 күн бұрын
They are also reassignable if a target gets hit by another missile before impact or if a hardened target is discovered to be more valuable
@Whiskey11Gaming
@Whiskey11Gaming 3 күн бұрын
While I don't disagree with the assertion that this will absolutely destroy a SAM site, both the S300 and S400 have the capability to intercept low flying cruise missiles. The S300 even has a dedicated low altitude search radar (NATO Name: Clam Shell) designed to address those very threats. Will it struggle with these modern systems? Yes.
@expertbrody9914
@expertbrody9914 2 күн бұрын
​@@Whiskey11GamingEven then rapid dragon can litterally fire hundreds sam sites would be overwhelmed.
@Vandelberger
@Vandelberger 3 күн бұрын
WW1-2: "Hey, our enemies have dumped their supply pallets on us! Sweet." WW3: "Oh no, Supply pallets!"
@fatetestarossa2774
@fatetestarossa2774 2 күн бұрын
Supply pallets FTW : )))) jajajajajjajajajajajajajjajajajajjajajajajaj
@xdestroyr69x_76
@xdestroyr69x_76 3 күн бұрын
The Air Force seems to love turning cargo planes into portable armageddon; we had the AC-130, now we have this flying democracy delivery system 😂
@haywoodjay385
@haywoodjay385 3 күн бұрын
*flying democratic republic delivery system*
@Spartan101st
@Spartan101st 3 күн бұрын
Instead of AC-130s.They are going to have to call them BC-130s. LOL!!
@causewaykayak
@causewaykayak 3 күн бұрын
We are watching your 'democracy' and it fails to impress. Politicians using your laws and bought judges to disable political opponents. Suppressing the independent candidate Kennedy and loads more. The US is good at destruction - Large angry children.
@trollmcclure1884
@trollmcclure1884 3 күн бұрын
@@Spartan101st They've got enough acronyms and abbreviations already. Dont give them ideas
@coreypickens6792
@coreypickens6792 3 күн бұрын
In all fairness the real Armageddon Hercules is the EC-130J running TACAMO mission.
@antonnurwald5700
@antonnurwald5700 3 күн бұрын
Weaponized logistics pallets? SOMEONE CALL RYAN!
@syjiang
@syjiang 3 күн бұрын
LoL We need to introduce Chris to the Typhon launcher that is part of the army MRC program...weaponized cargo pallet on truck is a reality already.
@michaelccozens
@michaelccozens 3 күн бұрын
@@syjiang And I guess they're testing it for ship-borne deployment, too? I'm picturing one of those massive cargo-carriers with every inch of deck covered in cargo containers spitting-out missiles. Is it possible to sink one of those ships via downward thrust on the deck alone? Let's find out!
@CubeInspector
@CubeInspector 3 күн бұрын
Youre weird. That dude is a tard that couldnt make it past e7 in the infantry, the easiest branch to promote in. He doesn't know shit outside of basic infantry stuff. People treat him like he's some savant
@Mrdardas99
@Mrdardas99 2 күн бұрын
​@@michaelccozensinstead of imagining go watch WW2 pacific theater footage. They had ships with decks absolutely covered in rockets. Yes they were smaller and unguided but seeing hundreds of rocket engines light up on a ship is still super awesome.
@Janus936
@Janus936 3 күн бұрын
You should have interviewed Gurler Ari and asked him how he got the idea
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 2 күн бұрын
He’s no longer affiliated with the military so I dunno if he’d be interested but that’s a great idea
@vanodne
@vanodne 3 күн бұрын
Now, remember that Vietnam-era experiment where the Navy launched and landed C130s from a carrier?... Your move, China.
@wan3416
@wan3416 2 күн бұрын
And that was the old E model… Js are more than 25% more powerful and holds records for climb rates, takeoff distance and landing distance under MULTIPLE aircraft takeoff weights. The current stuff looks like the old stuff but it’s what’s on the inside that counts :)
@johnwurfel2862
@johnwurfel2862 2 күн бұрын
Fat Albert: JATO has entered the chat
@Sniperboy5551
@Sniperboy5551 2 күн бұрын
@johnwurfel2862 JATO is still in use for C-130 missions to Antarctica, so I’m sure there’s still a large stockpile of them.
@LunaticTheCat
@LunaticTheCat 2 күн бұрын
This would be such a cool way of substantially expanding to combat radius of our carriers.
@zedwpd
@zedwpd 3 күн бұрын
You weren't kidding about the ASVAB scores. When I was signing up with the Air Force recruiter in Hannibal, Missouri, there was another guy talking to another Air Force recruiter in the same office. I couldn't hear their conversation, but the young recruit started to cry. The recruiter puts his arm around him and walked him out the office and down the hall. After an hour passed, I see the recruit again and he's high fiving everyone and has a huge grin on his face. When I left the Air Force office I looked down the same hallway the young recruit came from. The office said US Army. His ASVAB scores weren't high enough to get into the Air Force but the Army took him.
@williamblaker2628
@williamblaker2628 2 күн бұрын
ASVAB score determines which MOS (job) you qualify for. I'm sure the Airforce has some MOSs that don't require a high ASVAB score, for example: truck driver, cook, security guard, bulldozer operator, medical orderly, etc. They're not all computer programmers over there.
@Plaprad
@Plaprad 2 күн бұрын
@@williamblaker2628 That's how it works, but it also has to do with quotas. If manning for all those jobs is "adequate" then there's no reason to sign up people for them. Just use the ones who fail out of tech school instead.
@r7calvin
@r7calvin 2 күн бұрын
​@@Plaprad can't you just study for and retake the ASVAB? If you really want a particular job that takes a high score, it's probably worth studying a few months and retaking it instead of just giving up, right?
@Plaprad
@Plaprad 2 күн бұрын
@@r7calvin Not sure about now, but twenty years ago, yes. I had a buddy who missed his job by like two points. So he retook the ASVAB again a month later IIRC. He got the job he wanted. But, they also change the requirements. So, if your wanted job requires say, a score of 69 and you made 67, then you could retake it. But, when you retake and make a 70, the job could have been changed to require 75. Not a big thing, but it happened to my recruiter, so it got pounded into my head when I was doing the enlistment stuff.
@deanfirnatine7814
@deanfirnatine7814 2 күн бұрын
I think Marines even average a higher score
@americankid7782
@americankid7782 3 күн бұрын
I love Rapid Dragon because it means that a casual Cargo Aircraft can carry enough Cruise Missiles to make any Adversary VERY nervous about any Cargo Aircraft anywhere near them. And by "Anywhere near them" I mean within 1,000 miles
@sidhantjasrotia7079
@sidhantjasrotia7079 3 күн бұрын
So a bunch of civilian aircraft will get shot down like in the past, cool
@sCiphre
@sCiphre 3 күн бұрын
It's a cool and useful weapon, but this is a nightmare scenario for civil aviation
@aaroncabatingan5238
@aaroncabatingan5238 2 күн бұрын
​@@sCiphreIf a large-scale war broke out where a system like this is needed to be deployed, then civil aviation is already f u c k e d anyway.
@sCiphre
@sCiphre 2 күн бұрын
@@aaroncabatingan5238 I like to think that China is looking at this and going "well, we can't afford that many radars"
@Patson20
@Patson20 2 күн бұрын
And what's even more of a flex.....our adversaries have nowhere near the number of cargo aircraft we do to even attempt this tactic.
@emeraldleafeon
@emeraldleafeon 3 күн бұрын
10:21 y'all say that's a b-1 takeoff, but that's a B-2 spirit.
@atticusrussell1225
@atticusrussell1225 2 күн бұрын
Good catch
@grahamsawyer831
@grahamsawyer831 3 күн бұрын
"...mentally ill in the best way possible..." absolutely priceless. Cappy you're a G
@mattmmilli8287
@mattmmilli8287 3 күн бұрын
Imagine when next, each one drops and deploys 10,000 AI piloted drones with a 20lb explosive each
@studiesinflux1304
@studiesinflux1304 3 күн бұрын
I find it odd that hasn’t happened yet: in 2019 at a cybersecurity conference, we discussed the war game scenario of a terrorist driving a truck filled with IED-toting quadcopters to a soft target for asymmetric warfare
@shaeleable
@shaeleable 2 күн бұрын
Why not a cruise missile that when it nears the target, launches 50 2kg drones that auto target anything in the vicinity while the missile goes on to hit its main target?
@pierowmania2775
@pierowmania2775 2 күн бұрын
​@@shaeleableI would imagine there would be a lot of "shear forces" involved making this an engineering nightmare if not down right impossible. I'm not saying that we shouldn't investigate this possibility. I just think that we should tackle it from the angle of overcoming the "moment of deployment" issue as the hardest problem to solve.
@shaeleable
@shaeleable 2 күн бұрын
@@pierowmania2775 Oh absolutely there would be some issues with launching drones from a cruise missile body at 600mph, but it would be awesome to see.. from a distance 🤣
@Pupil0fGod
@Pupil0fGod 2 күн бұрын
@@shaeleable at that point it is just easier to drop a cluster munition
@NET-POSITIVE
@NET-POSITIVE 3 күн бұрын
We do have a 747 with a giant chemical laser too! My family member was a senior engineer on the ABL(AIR BOURNE LASER) that is still in our inventory and very capable!
@jasonroman578
@jasonroman578 3 күн бұрын
Sssshhhhhh your talking to loud
@sCiphre
@sCiphre 3 күн бұрын
Tell us more about this "layzer", comra... Uhh, friendo
@jasonroman578
@jasonroman578 3 күн бұрын
The CCP is listening 👂
@niner_six_echo
@niner_six_echo 3 күн бұрын
Lebanon Regional: "UPS 242 Heavy, what's that coming out of your aircraft?" 242 Heavy: "Just a local delivery."
@dennis2376
@dennis2376 2 күн бұрын
:)
@GeorgeSemel
@GeorgeSemel 3 сағат бұрын
I forgot to mention that all the heavy freight haulers from UPS and FedEx can be drafted to haul stuff for the military. We don't really have an airlift shortage. Still it would be better to just build more C-130's and C-17's. As for Rapid Dragon, I think the name is wrong, It should be Rapid Burrito! Mexico needs love too!
@kevinalvarez5079
@kevinalvarez5079 3 күн бұрын
Did I hear Mrs Cappy clanking dishes around 11:30 lol
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 3 күн бұрын
that's exactly what that was lol I thought maybe it would sound like cargo clanking around instead
@Paulkjoss
@Paulkjoss 3 күн бұрын
Too funny 😂
@Chironex_Fleckeri
@Chironex_Fleckeri 3 күн бұрын
​@@Taskandpurpose😂 she's doing double duty
@yert527
@yert527 2 күн бұрын
Oh darn beat me to this lol
@Chironex_Fleckeri
@Chironex_Fleckeri 3 күн бұрын
DARPA: sometimes my own genius frightens me
@PhilipEason
@PhilipEason Күн бұрын
This is right up there with the ground attack crop duster. It seems wonderful until you realize that air defense still exists. If people were already planning to shoot down your real cruise missile carriers, and they are, this is not going to pose a challenge.
@RoboticTable
@RoboticTable 3 күн бұрын
Literally a cargo plane-sized MIRV
@lonjohnson5161
@lonjohnson5161 3 күн бұрын
This went in the opposite direction than I expected. I imagined a missile that would deliver supplies to troops in the field.
@davidbilich1708
@davidbilich1708 2 күн бұрын
That supply is a 1000lbs warhead. And it goes to the enemy forehead.
@submachinegun5737
@submachinegun5737 2 күн бұрын
It’s an involuntary munitions donation
@AFNBarbosa
@AFNBarbosa 3 күн бұрын
Funny thing is that I actually have been thinking about a system like that for years. A bomber is only useful during war but a cargo plane is useful all the time, so by giving cargo planes that capability not only would you increase your vectors of ordnance delivery available, you would do it for way cheaper. Take a plane like the Embraer C-390 Millennium, pair it up with something like an E-8 or E-3 Sentry for long range target guidance and you could dominate huge areas.
@zbyszanna
@zbyszanna 3 күн бұрын
As for logistic trucks being converted into missile trucks, we've already seen Brimstones being launched from a van.
@user-qd6nn6sj5v
@user-qd6nn6sj5v 3 күн бұрын
Imagine the entire concept started because a bunch of Engineers, a couple of pilots and loadmasters started talking at a bar over drinks and somebody came up with the crazy idea with this as the end result
@StormEagle5
@StormEagle5 2 күн бұрын
10:55 I was getting ready to make this point. As there are many allies who could utilize their cargo fleet to deliver this ordinance. I'm glad you made it.
@NickMirro
@NickMirro 2 күн бұрын
My God this channel is something! With all the horrible things going on, your humor and deep insight makes it so much easier to digest. You are a top-tier presenter, as good as anyone on any news network.
@projectpiano5231
@projectpiano5231 3 күн бұрын
3:39 using "thrust" with that on screen is.. strategic language. Your editing Easter eggs don't go unnoticed lol
@prateeknegi997
@prateeknegi997 3 күн бұрын
8:30💀💀
@SA12String
@SA12String 3 күн бұрын
There's something to be said for the concept of sending up 4 C-17s, 2 loaded with basically inert, cheap and fake cruise missiles and the other 2 loaded with full boogie murder missiles. Swarming air defense just got a lot easier.
@rogerk6180
@rogerk6180 3 күн бұрын
The explosives are not what makes these things expensive.
@fatetestarossa2774
@fatetestarossa2774 2 күн бұрын
@@rogerk6180 AGREE ; )))
@LunaticTheCat
@LunaticTheCat 2 күн бұрын
And by "fake" missiles, I assume you are talking about ADM-160 MALD decoy missiles?
@scottmaberry285
@scottmaberry285 3 күн бұрын
13:42 I like how the palette has the capability of dragging the chute out of the plane. Amazing piece of hdw
@harleyb.birdwhisperer
@harleyb.birdwhisperer 2 күн бұрын
That’s old. I did it in the ‘60’s (C-141’s). Load 1 caries the extraction ‘chute for load 2, 2 carries 3, etc. 1 comes out of a bomb release above the ramp. Old, but it works. The extraction part of this is long perfected. The new part is what’s getting yanked out of the plane. Missles instead of trucks and tanks.
@walker1812
@walker1812 3 күн бұрын
As someone who’s been reading Honor Harrington novels for decades, it’s nice to see the military catching up to the concept of “Roll Pods!” and having the enemy shit itself.
@ryanc9282
@ryanc9282 14 сағат бұрын
Thank you, whole reason I was scrolling was to find this reference.
@dreamingwolf8382
@dreamingwolf8382 3 күн бұрын
Please keep making weapon systems' metaphors for/with different foods items. Makes me laugh my ass off every time.
@oteliadavid7507
@oteliadavid7507 3 күн бұрын
Bro, your videos are gold.
@THE-X-Force
@THE-X-Force 2 күн бұрын
Scammer bot.
@vipondiu
@vipondiu 3 күн бұрын
I didn't know it was named after an ancient siege weapon from China, of all places...But on a more important note; Con Air is one of the few Nic Cage movies that are not only watchable, but actually good. The Rock and Gone in 60 seconds are even better in my opinion.
@pierowmania2775
@pierowmania2775 2 күн бұрын
The original "Gone in 60 seconds" was good but the reboot was really good.
@daminox
@daminox 2 күн бұрын
0:42 The blu-82 bombs had the most badass nickname: Daisy Cutters.
@samsonsoturian6013
@samsonsoturian6013 3 күн бұрын
And Uncle Sam said: "LET THERE BE A BIG BOOM!!"
@causewaykayak
@causewaykayak 3 күн бұрын
Uncle Sam is the bad guy. Even this low level production makes clear the US intends several more proxy wars. Wasnt your war with Black Sea Russia enough ?? You are reportedly making a lot of money by restricting Russian oil and gas sales.
@RuckProductions35
@RuckProductions35 3 күн бұрын
As an aerial porter whos even worked in some of the places in this video and had hands on with some of this stuff, its so cool seeing you talk about this it and i freaking loved this video 😁
@jonniiinferno9098
@jonniiinferno9098 Күн бұрын
At most companies - there is an unwritten - but absolute and unavoidable rule: When you are good at something and show you are responsible, hard-working and a high achiever, the reward for your great work and effort is often - more work...
@Bacteriophagebs
@Bacteriophagebs 2 күн бұрын
A college buddy of mine worked on one of those inertial guidance systems. The goal was accuracy of three feet at one thousand miles. They achieved an accuracy of three _inches_ at _ten_ thousand miles. In his words, "They wanted us to be able to hit a car from a thousand miles away, and we gave them the ability to hit a guy in the nuts from halfway around the world." Of course, real-world accuracy isn't that good...yet. At least, not according to public records.
@vicnighthorse
@vicnighthorse 3 күн бұрын
That 747 is exactly the plane I'd most like to visit my family with;-)
@davidty2006
@davidty2006 2 күн бұрын
Plenty of those going spare right now.
@ZMB-on5ub
@ZMB-on5ub 3 күн бұрын
Can we Kickstarter "Alt Air: Con Air 2" starring Chris Cappy? I heard Cage finally paid his debts off so maybe an EP credit.
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 3 күн бұрын
my guilty pleasure is staying in all weekend watching terrible Cage movies
@ZMB-on5ub
@ZMB-on5ub 3 күн бұрын
Oh good. So the southern accent won't be a problem. This project is coming together flawlessly.
@keithdavis938
@keithdavis938 3 күн бұрын
Liking the OCP T - “part infantry, part KZfaq, dead or alive, you’re subscribing to me” 😂
@DarkHorseSki
@DarkHorseSki 2 күн бұрын
Military cargo planes for ground support goes back even earlier with the Puff the Magic Dragon concept which started with some C-47's and old DC-3's.
@comlitbeta7532
@comlitbeta7532 3 күн бұрын
Now, put it in orbit
@Ormusn2o
@Ormusn2o 3 күн бұрын
DoD is very interested in military use of Starship so...
@nikolaideianov5092
@nikolaideianov5092 3 күн бұрын
​@@Ormusn2othey are probably interested in boring things like spy sats And not haveing dosens of cruise missiles in space :(
@svenrio8521
@svenrio8521 3 күн бұрын
ODST
@Ormusn2o
@Ormusn2o 3 күн бұрын
​@@nikolaideianov5092 They got Falcon 9 for that. Besides more sats, they want orbital dropship space marines. It's more for logistics and not ODST like in Halo at least for now.
@verdebusterAP
@verdebusterAP 3 күн бұрын
@@Ormusn2o Not likely
@denchness4772
@denchness4772 3 күн бұрын
Great video as always, I have finally caught up and watched every video on your main channel…go me 🙃 Now feel I’m a true member of the spare parts army 😁
@Taskandpurpose
@Taskandpurpose 3 күн бұрын
thanks for sticking through those terrible early videos haha
@denchness4772
@denchness4772 10 сағат бұрын
@@Taskandpurpose haha they not terrible dude, you have certainly honed your craft though. Most the time people that do silly jokes on there videos are generally unfunny. But will admit I either crack a smile, or have a little chuckle with yours. Keep up the good work, to you and your crew 👍😎
@demomanchaos
@demomanchaos 3 күн бұрын
The US has such staggering logistics we fed our boys in the Pacific theater ice cream, and Rapid Dragon completely cuts out the middle man making the supply chain even shorter
@winstongunnels3790
@winstongunnels3790 Күн бұрын
Good work Paul thank you. Though I’ve known about this for sometime your video managed to give me some new information which is hard to come by. thank you for your service and for the entertainment.
@michaelccozens
@michaelccozens 3 күн бұрын
Having your boss say "here's a totally separate full-time job to do on-top of your existing full-time job, no raise" is pretty much just daily life in the oligopolistic corporatist hellscape that is modern America.
@tconiam
@tconiam 3 күн бұрын
"Second 40"
@stefthorman8548
@stefthorman8548 2 күн бұрын
I mean, if you can do both "full time jobs" in an single work day, doesn't that mean you previous job was too easy, and not actually an full time job?
@chuckd9007
@chuckd9007 2 күн бұрын
Should have learned a trade, got some experince in that trade and start your own business in said trade, that way the more you work the more you make.
@DaweSMF
@DaweSMF 3 күн бұрын
10:25 for those who think he doesnt butcher every name on purpose - this is freedom name. Very clever cover for someone in international setting and variety of pronunciations, you can always say it was a joke even if you really have no clue how to pronounce it.
@Goulmy86
@Goulmy86 3 күн бұрын
Designed for military cargo planes. In a WW3 scenario 747 etc will be used. Plenty of troops were moved to Desert Storm in those. That will free up rapid dragon space. Also plenty of cargo civilian planes are available. So not so much of a problem if mobilised
@aaronpaul9188
@aaronpaul9188 3 күн бұрын
So, there is one key issue at play here. Cargo planes are absurdly vulnerable. They have next to no maneuver capability are rarely carry EW systems to protect themselves. Yea they often have flares, but thats useless against long range missiles anyway. The ONLY change these planes have is if they can stay well out of range of enemy air defenses. As Chappie said, this tactic is also based on saturation attacks where you overwhelm enemy air defenses. There are two missiles being considered here. The first is the AGM-158 ER, and the AGM-158 XR. Thats extended range vs extreme range. The extended range and extreme range. The ER version is the one where the cargo plane can carry up to 45 per salvo. The XR version is much larger and the plane wouldnt be able to carry nearly as many (though it does have twice the warhead). The ER version has good range, but also well within the effective operational range of the S500. Meaning it should get shot down before it can launch it missiles. The XR does outrange the S500 quite comfortably, but unless you bring several cargo planes you cant do saturation strikes in nearly the same way. In general, this is an interesting idea, and maybe it can work. But just know that cargo planes are absurdly vulnerable to air defenses unless kept far from the front lines. Also, this doesnt take into account any enemy fighters.
@Bladen1000
@Bladen1000 3 күн бұрын
They can launch theses missles before they get in range of any air defense
@robertthweatt1900
@robertthweatt1900 3 күн бұрын
Wouldn't enemy fighters penetrating that deeply into what's for them hostile airspace be at great risk? And with the number of cargo planes likely to be in the air (along with potential decoys), which are worth targeting, with either fighters or missiles? IIRC, USN is looking at something similar, "if it floats, it fights" is the phrase. The weapon has such range and navigational capability that the platform can be relatively common and cheap. Greatest potential is use in a preemptive attack. As noted, could be very destabilizing, especially if nuclear capable weapons can be launched.
@fountainvalley100
@fountainvalley100 3 күн бұрын
Considering that missile defense systems are looking at a 100-200 range the aircraft would be well outside that range. Keep in mind that a US total strike could deliver over 15,000 missiles.
@AlexanderTzalumen
@AlexanderTzalumen 3 күн бұрын
JASSM-ER has a range of >575 miles (from public sources) S-500 has a range of 373 miles (from public sources) How do you conclude that an S-500 can intercept a cargo plane on a Rapid Dragon launch mission, when the cargo plane does not need to enter the range of the S-500 to launch its payload?
@hondaguymontes8213
@hondaguymontes8213 3 күн бұрын
8:30 WHAT?!!!! 😂😂😂😂😂
@drakus40k
@drakus40k 3 күн бұрын
Every time the video showed the cargo area on a C130, I could smell it. My dad was an avionics tech in the AK Air National Guard, and worked on Hercs for his whole career. So I grew up around them, and then when I joined the Army, it felt like they were the airlift of choice. lol. I love that damned plane.
@MourningShark5Gaming
@MourningShark5Gaming 2 күн бұрын
US MIlitary in the 2000s: Nah man we don't have to fire 45 cruise missiles at a dude with an AK... at one time.
@scotthazelton519
@scotthazelton519 3 күн бұрын
Thanks for sharing Cappy
@KarpKomet
@KarpKomet 2 күн бұрын
7000 JASSM's in the US inventory strikes me as quite impressive. Congratulations America you developed a system to help with spamming your JASSM all over the enemy
@Hostilenemy
@Hostilenemy 3 күн бұрын
AGM158 Gives me a huge OrJASSM.
@4_xk
@4_xk Күн бұрын
"Pallet of cruise missiles" is not a combination of words I ever expected to hear.
@gjm1203
@gjm1203 2 күн бұрын
"Be advised, Swarm inbound"
@medicmedic2608
@medicmedic2608 Күн бұрын
Sounds really stupid honestly, when the enemy eventually shoots down a civilian airliner you got no one to blame but yourself
@TheDaveRout
@TheDaveRout 3 күн бұрын
Love your delivery. Great video
@wpayne72
@wpayne72 3 күн бұрын
Air Force Dropped the ball on this one. Should've named it "Flaming Dragon" Tropic Thunder Style
@bigeez9432
@bigeez9432 3 күн бұрын
I liked my own comment.
@nikolaideianov5092
@nikolaideianov5092 3 күн бұрын
I liked my own comment too
@UsrYtb-zx3ru
@UsrYtb-zx3ru 3 күн бұрын
I like all comments.
@albow4oops5
@albow4oops5 3 күн бұрын
I comment on my own likes.
@sirdiealot53
@sirdiealot53 3 күн бұрын
Tawk Hooah? 😂
@SnickC13
@SnickC13 3 күн бұрын
You say that like it isn't already something we all do ...right???
@deriznohappehquite
@deriznohappehquite 3 күн бұрын
One 1 view. Bro fell off.
@smotherytable39
@smotherytable39 3 күн бұрын
these comments are old and unoriginal, why do ppl still say this
@BESTMOAD
@BESTMOAD 3 күн бұрын
Bro is 5
@sage8573
@sage8573 3 күн бұрын
You dropped the ball
@matthewwebster3143
@matthewwebster3143 3 күн бұрын
Bro these comments are dropping off 😂
@deriznohappehquite
@deriznohappehquite 3 күн бұрын
@@smotherytable39 I fell off.
@fakshen1973
@fakshen1973 3 күн бұрын
Build more C130s. We could use the capacity. Plus they can handle landing in "rough" areas, allowing Rapid Dragon packages to be disbursed to more locations than a near peer can saturate with their own cruise missiles.
@SmokesKwazukii
@SmokesKwazukii 2 күн бұрын
this is actually such a frighteningly feasible idea that i cant imagine it wont become a standard practice. The amount of precise destruction this would allow is absurd.
@angelacortez4599
@angelacortez4599 Күн бұрын
This is actually soothing in context.
@Fakename-ub8pw
@Fakename-ub8pw Күн бұрын
We already have F/A 18, so I wouldn't be surprised if we get C/B 130 soon.
@benjaminshropshire2900
@benjaminshropshire2900 3 күн бұрын
As for the quip at the end about logistics trucks; I'd say go one further and figure out how to turn port-a-potties into air defense nodes (the phrasing is a joke but the concept isn't). Build a short/med-range, fast-response, low-cost-per-target air defense system (think iron dome, but intended to engage nation state built (G)MLRS type threats) where the deployment and ground infrastructure for the munitions are comparable to a port-a-potty; just set it down on some more or less flat ground and send up fuel truck around every few days to pump some fluids over. Ideally it would even look like something that costs about as much as a port-a-potty so you can deploy a crap ton (pardon the pub) decoys.
@shaeleable
@shaeleable 2 күн бұрын
the US already designed a weapons system that auto targeted the porta-potty 🤣
@BradleySmith-xv2ec
@BradleySmith-xv2ec 3 күн бұрын
Glad to have been a part (small) of the A.F.
@computerz009
@computerz009 3 күн бұрын
i'm not a military guy at all but you are one of favorite youtube channels. Great work Chris!
@jackmakinson-sanders7279
@jackmakinson-sanders7279 2 күн бұрын
Great content as per the usual. SUPER sweet OCP shirt too!
@jloiben12
@jloiben12 12 сағат бұрын
China: We will deny you access to Taiwan and the surrounding area when we war with Taiwan. America: You should have learned from Russia. [a few moments later] America: Allow me to introduce you to the Rapid Dragon system and our hypersonic revolver.
@SeattleJeffin
@SeattleJeffin 21 сағат бұрын
"insane in the best way possible" best line ever.
@fillefrans2020
@fillefrans2020 2 күн бұрын
I applaud you for illustrating the Danger Zone.
@StephenTSchuler
@StephenTSchuler 9 сағат бұрын
Naming this thing Rapid Dragon is such a flex.
@orionsgaming73
@orionsgaming73 23 сағат бұрын
14:18 To quote Riddick: "...and the worst mistake you made? Empty gun rack."
@mark1sown
@mark1sown 2 күн бұрын
Very cool, thanks for update, very important information increasing knowledge 😊👍
@roberthill5805
@roberthill5805 2 күн бұрын
There was a paper being circulated on pallets of rods with gps guidance and deployable fins to cave in rooves of insurgent holdings. It had the greatest pictures.
@bescotdude9121
@bescotdude9121 Күн бұрын
9 atacms missiles can fit in a standard 20 foot shipping container with a gap of a foot on each side
@nadelius1
@nadelius1 2 күн бұрын
"Why does thing make me want to hooah all over the place" 😂😂 That's Army as hell!
@killman369547
@killman369547 3 күн бұрын
Ok, we nailed the logistics of how to get the missile from the factory to the target as quickly as possible. Now we just need to work on the logistics of BUILDING THE MISSILES.
@dragonfish3596
@dragonfish3596 5 сағат бұрын
This feels like the best weapon for a AC130 gun ship,it could kill any anti air in the are so it can help people on the ground or just blow anything too heavy to pen with its guns
@HansMcMurdy
@HansMcMurdy 2 күн бұрын
I'd bet a lot of money the B1 is about to get a serious upgrade. That rotary system looks very similar, and the B1 flies a hell of a lot faster.
@williamhornabrook8081
@williamhornabrook8081 3 күн бұрын
45 cruise missiles being deployed from a single cargo plane is pretty crazy to think of. You'd need some pretty advanced and dense air defences to survive an attack.
@shanelyon414
@shanelyon414 2 күн бұрын
Love the OCP t-shirt Chris! Keep on rocking it!
@4700_Dk
@4700_Dk 2 күн бұрын
Use to fly the C5A Galaxy to Hickam and Travis, cost for a hop flight was $10.00 each way in 82.
@phamnhuhien6758
@phamnhuhien6758 Күн бұрын
It means that every us cargo plane is now clear for shoot dowm
@jmanj3917
@jmanj3917 2 күн бұрын
0:02 ...in the best way possible...lol
@Plaprad
@Plaprad 2 күн бұрын
Almost had it. Yes, the C-17 is bigger. But more capable? Nah. When the last C-17 goes to the boneyard, a 130 will be there to fly the crew home. But this was actually a rather popular topic in the 130 community in the early 2000's. There were all kinds of wild... let's call them "ideas" at the time. A C-130 with floats (No idea who came up with this gem) and even an idea to put a giant rotor on top to make them VTOL. Two I remember. The first was basically this. Have missile launchers on pallets to be dropped. But at the time it was either Tomahawks or smaller ones like Hellfires. The other was a drone tank that could be airdropped and basically threw the missiles at enemy tanks. The drawings they had for it were awesome. Just yeet and boom.
Why America's B-1 Bomber is Unstoppable
20:17
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
The Bohdana: Ukraine's Secret Weapon of War
18:44
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 300 М.
NERF WAR HEAVY: Drone Battle!
00:30
MacDannyGun
Рет қаралды 44 МЛН
Looks realistic #tiktok
00:22
Анастасия Тарасова
Рет қаралды 4,7 МЛН
North Korea's NEW Tank is a Nightmare
19:07
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 3,3 МЛН
Why the German Army is Rebuilding (again)
23:56
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 639 М.
What Would an Israel-Hezbollah War Look Like?
42:25
Warographics
Рет қаралды 61 М.
The President's Incredible Travel System
25:17
Megaprojects
Рет қаралды 350 М.
Why this American F-18 Shot down a Syrian SU-22
18:54
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 1,2 МЛН
Why Ukraine’s Taking the Turtle Tank Seriously
18:22
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 802 М.
Bugatti's Giant V16 Engine Is Insane - All The Tourbillon Details!
17:15
Engineering Explained
Рет қаралды 321 М.
How the Worst Group was Destroyed
21:29
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 1,5 МЛН
Britain's New Tank is Legitimately Insane
21:05
Task & Purpose
Рет қаралды 993 М.
NERF WAR HEAVY: Drone Battle!
00:30
MacDannyGun
Рет қаралды 44 МЛН