Or new with defects.

@@karyannfontaine8757that too

@@karyannfontaine8757 no that is an older 737

@@aviationdoge8699 its a 737-300

Metal fatigue

that's not going to happen in real life as a EMT myself i hate these kind of things

Please do! As a crew member myself its very important to know :)

Had a friend take a trip on a airplane. The staff were 'monsters' as she put it but not in a bad way. The moment the time came for the safety demo to start, The staff in the most polite way told everyone to 'sit down and shut up, put away ALL electronics besides what you need to hear, see or use via medicine (the insulin pumps phones). Then did the demo only to start over again if someone made a noise that wasn't needed (a child talking so to speak or a baby like that didn't count) It took the staff 20 extra minutes before the plane took off do to the no nonsense of the staff. The thing is that has not been a single complaint about the staff for the way they did the demos. As they were only 'monsters' when doing the demo and the rest of the time were sweet.

I always pay attention to it!!!

​@@sassbratThat's the way it should be done!!! Kudos to the flight attendants for not taking any nonsense!!!

Underrated comment 🤣

As far as I'm aware, firefighters have to have emt training too.

​@@Voidi-Voidyep and vice versa.... actually they're both Firefighters and Paramedics it's usually dependent on their shift and the situation

@@Zephyr_Phoenix76 My home station has either specifically trained firefighters, medics who went through fire training after finishing NREMT, or medics, so as far as I'm aware there is no vice versa, Void is correct So to the original comment, you wouldn't be seeing medics going into fires, it's only the firefighters, although most have medical training, however there was a little context missing, they sent in air medics, with proper protection, sent in for rescue, and usually from what I've heard from the other station guys, if they wouldn't be in immediate danger from the fire and can be protected, and there is a patient that needs immediate rescue, or locating they may send in a medic

isn't in US paramedics part of the fire department?

This video is the reason I believe in God

In high shock impact its somewhat better to be limp and unprepared as the limp body rebounds a bit more against the shock but a tensed body creates a wall at 100 miles an hour meets a wall standing still

That was Sully. Different case. 🙃

I think that these are clipped, so we probably didn't see that part, or they might have just not had that be part of the episode, because they wanted to focus more on the passengers and/or the pilots. Hollywood doesn't always keep the practical.

Well yeah but...there is the possibility that jet engines will explode also it did look like before the belly landed the engine was already of fire and burning so they probably forgot to dump fuel

@@Zephyr_Phoenix76 I think, judging by the start of the video, the engine was already on fire, which was part and parcel of the reason for the emergency landing. Also, it's possible that (given it's said that there was something wrong with the hydraulics for the landing gear) the landing gear may have been partially down, or that one or more might not have been dropping, so that might have caused it to not land level.

its a dc-10 cockpit with a 737-300 external model lmao

@@topgun1457 XD

Dire situation, even gravity failed.

Depending on HOW they failed, they might not have been able to. In most cases yes, just a generic failure gravity works. But in other cases, they might fail because of a different reason preventing them from lowering in general, though those cases usually only has one gear with the issue, not all.

He said “we don’t have time to lower them manually” 🥴

I’m assuming black tarp = deceased. Edit: watched the video some more, it does in fact mean deceased.

@@IansGamingVault Deceased or soon-to-be-deceased.

@@jr637-1oh I don’t think I knew about the soon-to-deceased part.

What are the tarp colors?

​@@sethcourtemanche5738 - Red for major and urgent injuries - Orange for major but and not urgent - Green for minor injuries but not majorly urgent - Black, well Deceased or not viable for care

um actually with how it landed it would have felt like a slightly hard landing

There's mention of the gear hydraulics being damaged, and the pilots say something about "not having enough time to lower manually," so it's possible that the gear was partially extended (due to gravity) but not locked, or that they couldn't retract it/lock them back once they'd made the initial attempt, thus possibly leaving them with some but not all gear down.

@@Mokiefraggle Okay thats good to have brought in the context so as why the landing gear couldn't be deployed. And i get the crash was all for drama but realistically, it is possible to land a plane without landing gear.

yeah I was thinking that

20 years later: "Why are you afraid of flying?" "I don't know. It just happens."

Until you realize people died

Not so cool when people can die!!!

That's kind of their job

Who names these jobs

Hi there!

That much mass at that speed, hitting the water is no different than hitting concrete. Also, given where they were, they'd most likely be landing in the San Francisco Bay, and...we have _sharks._ Like, I don't recall hearing a lot of stories about shark attacks there, but we have a city called Tiburon for a reason. Also, you have to worry about how quickly it'd sink, and a whole host of other things...probably not that much safer.

While the idea of landing on water is a desirable, it's probably worse to do so. The reasons are that landing on water at that speed would cause the plane to break up. Aircraft are not water tight, so landing in water will create a different hazard for the passengers, instead of fire there is water. Generally it is better to land on a runway or plateau than it is to land on water. Specifically in this case, it was probably the best decision to land on the runway. It is safer for the passengers after landing due to the lack of water invading into the aircraft, the response time of emergency responders is practically instantaneous, and it provides an area for said responders to do their work.

Currents in SF Bay are very strong. Victims could potentially be swept out to sea. The water is also quite cold even in summer.

It's from a show called Triage. I don't know what episode though

@@carbonwolf3865 thx

Water landings have their own problems and are not really any safer. They also make it exponentially harder for any first responders

The Sully incident was a rare lucky exception but far away from the norm. Usually water landings with jets will cause the plane to break apart immediately and/or flip over.

@@pythagorasaurusrex9853 Yeah, because in most cases, impacts with water at high speeds (or from a considerable elevation) are like plowing into concrete. Water can behave as a non-Newtonian fluid, and basically becomes harder to cut through the more impact force applied across a broader space. It's why leaping off a bridge and just slamming flat into the water below will likely kill you or break bones on impact, but you could potentially survive by landing with a narrow point first (diving, or landing feet-first). This means that the plane would basically be hitting something that despite being liquid, would essentially behave as a solid surface at the moment of impact.