Love the imagery of House walking down the hall in black, while Wilson wears white, all the while contrasting the good/evil theme with the actual morality discussion

Timestamp?

1:53

Bro turned back into Micheal scofield

THAT is how you joust with House.

A literally bleeding heart would also be a medical condition....

​@@obliviouz r/woooosh

@@Spiketrooper Oh, you're no fun.

You didn’t actually have to be so openly intellectually delinquent. It’s a stupid “condition,” because it’s not a condition. The fact you can’t see what he actually said is pretty telling. Also a “bleeding heart” is potentially fatal. Hush.

@@Veldrusara Z zezeExxz

999

Only if you're not the one in charge. If you're the one in charge, you don't have to defend it.

​@@latentgamer5762 You have to; even in a position of absoulte power. In this case you don't have to defend it that fiercely, you don't have to give better arguments etc. but you have to stick to your point without surrendering to someone who tries to sway you.

@@latentgamer5762 Which boss is better: the one who comes up with a good plan, and when questioned on it says that he's in charge and to do as he says, or the one who comes up with the same plan, and when questioned gives reasonable responses and convinces his subordinates that it's a good plan?

@@treecko7424 I prefer the boss with the poorly defended plan. There are a couple of reasons for this. 1. It is up to the boss to take the gamble after being presented with questions and information, and being wrong will severely weaken him. 2. Subordinates find out that they can win in the discussion and thus will be more motivated to think critically. More critically thinking minds on any problem will prevent mistakes in the thought process from influencing the discussion. 3. The premise provided is faulty in the first place. If it's a good plan either way, there is a reduction in critical thinking, and only the boss can win. If it's a bad plan, there is a process in making it a good plan, and everyone benefits.

Dammit, I don't want to get Peacock just to rewatch the whole episode.

@@AnnoyingNewsletters got Amazon prime?

@@AnnoyingNewsletters Piracy

Did he give House the money?

​@@AnnoyingNewslettersthey do sell DVDs of house.

Yeah he was in jail for being a super villain too apparently he fought the Flash a few times but I hear he joined a team after this was all over and was deployed as a "Legend" what ever that means...

@@shadowforgeyou ruined it

@@amaraxchi That’s cold… just like this supervillain

I heard he became a captain or something. Still gives people the cold shoulder though

Gotta love America

"Children don't respond too well to electro-shock therapy, and you can get batteries at the nearest Walmart." "Mr House, we can't shock students!" "We can, you probably meant 'don't want to' or 'believe we shouldn't', but it hardly keeps me from dropping 10 bucks on a value pack."

He would be trying to fire students lol

​@@alecdickens1042 I hear him saying this

@@TheCasualTea7210 Nailed it!

Isn't the hospital he works in a teaching hospital?

This is America. We steal from poor people to help rich people in need of more money

I AM in Canada!😁

I'd actually argue he's looked better than before.

@@lankancheetah It's true but he resorted to being a side character on a medical show. I'd think a man of scofield's expertise would do some thing different

He’s planning to break out from the hospital 😂😂😂😂

You realise House ended in 2012 right?

@@HaiCopper :(

Significant difference being House is genuine, honest, and transparent from beginning, while our Watson here puts on a facade of ethical justice until it works in his favour

Undoubtedly taking a million dollars from someone who is super rich, for the purpose of helping a hospital, is taking advantage of that person in a much less serious way than taking a kidney from him.

And why stop at donating just the kidney? He has an extra lung, eye, part of his liver/pancreas/intestine, bone marrow/skin grafts/blood donations for the rest of his life. Even his gonads could potentially be donated.

It wasn't just a kidney. It was his second one. He'd die.

Well, in his own words in another episode, helping others is just a side effect. He likes solving puzzles, and his staff helped with that.

It may be true, but why is he so cruel to her all the time? He doesn't even like or want her getting the gracious and kind offer of a $2 cup of coffee! Why is he so mean-spirited and hateful to her,? Of course he is to most other people also. Even though theoretically he's right, he doesn't really like anyone. He barely tolerates the human species. Why is that an admirable thing?

Just because it's true doesn't make it praiseworthy.

​@@annwrog for the record i just wanna say that in science being right doesn't justify anything until you can prove it, she makes assumptions, she can't back it up so she has to progress. If house just nods and accepts the first time she makes her assumptions and it's wrong it would not only be risky to the patient, but she would not progress either as she would lose any sense of proof needed in science. It's not admirable tho house is just a representation of the reality that is science, cold, impartial and mean to anything that can't back up claims with science logic

@@annwrog never watched House before I see

Wilson is more than just supporting character, I would argue that he has second billing/importance in the series. Not a co-lead but higher than a ''secondary character''

@@yevgeniyaleshchenko849 agreed

I love the irony of House saying it, lol.

It's worth it

Yes, do it. The clips are great, but you gotta watch the show.

I started watching for this reason.

I finished Season 1 today. It's pretty good

Your missing the intros

Cheers bro

@@Abigart69 ayy cheers :)

Otherwise he wouldnt be House's moral compass. He would be the authority figure that House fights against. The new dynamic wouldnt work. If you are talking about in universe reasons well there was no reason really.

Wilson isn't going to stop House; he's an enabler. That was what made House so interested in him in the first place.

Easy. He’s a white lol. And straight. Give it to him over Foreman and you’re a racist piece of shite. Right? I mean that’s the general trend in social opinions these days, right?

In universe, it makes sense because Foreman will stand up to House. Wilson, not as much. If we want to be realistic hiring the black guy gives you ticks to your diversity ratio, which is a thing in companies. Makes Foreman a bit more favorable especially since he is competent enough to also actually do the job well. It's a win/win.

I doubt Wilson wants the job. He wouldn't swap treating patients for balancing the hospital budget and he isn't power hungry.

yeah, the nice thing about writing fiction is your strawmen can be as elaborate as you need them to be.

no

@@redfordreddington8834 I think they mean that there’s no point in having a baby if they can’t take care of it

@@myway24454 It's not a "Pro-Life" advice, it's a "Pro" (as in expert) life advice. They're saying it's just good advice to take.

It's one of the best advice a Physician can get

@@redfordreddington8834 applies to a lot of things actually. A lot of life can be seen as an "argument". You change jobs cause you think it'll make you happier, if you don't prove it then you're wrong. You can come up with countless examples, just being right isn't enough if you can't follow through

😅🤣

Thank you!!! Not just for saving your wife, but for showing credentials alone aren't enough to cure illness and facilitate wellness. Doctors are critical to our survival, but they are humans too and make mistakes. I'm not an M.D., I have my PhD and yet, I've been treated by some MD's like I'm an idiot because my degrees aren't in medicine. I have to speak jargon and essentially bring up my education just so they might listen to me more seriously. If I went on that working hypothesis that people are idiots until provem otherwise and treated my students as such, I'd not only be a terrible professor, but I would take any chance of hope and inspiration I can offer them to make a difference with their lives, and cast it aside. And I'd be pathetic for brow beating people coming to me for guidance, growth, and unconditional support. Yoy get no poibts for being a jerk just because you can. My students are my legacy. The hope is that they will do well and pass on their knowledge and rational ideas to the mext generations. I know that the vast majority of doctors want to save lives and I am so grateful for each and every one of them. Just wish people valued all education instead of treating credentials in a peeing contest. Truth, science, logical and rational thought are worthy goals and should trump ignorance, unfounded conspiracy beliefs, and hubris. We are better when we value and respect each other.

You spelled House wrong lol only kidding but I have found in the field that doctors really dislike being told they have missed something by someone with lower education... I'm a paramedic and have been dismissed numerous times only to be right in the end.... It's a god complex that the whole profession suffers from. You had better thank God you got a doctor with some humility.

@@medix1203 But don't you think that's just the case in most areas of expertise? I mean, I've been in situations more then once where my facts-based arguments-based disagreeing with my auto mechanic, contractor, IT-guy or coworker was answered by ignoring me, treating me with the utmost contempt, and/or even the use of verbal aggression and a hostile demeanor. Perhaps this tends to leave a much bigger impression on us when it happens in the medical field, because of the potentially huge impact of errors.

@@LuiePool yeah you get them in every profession.... It just seems like I'm the medical profession it's amplified and they aren't willing to admit that they are wrong usually.

Wilson went completely hypocritical in this one..I just lost all respect for this character. To me he's just as corrupt as House.

@@xaviercast970 harsh toke dude

​@@xaviercast970 I mean, why? For making sure the potential kidney donor wasn't sick before accepting it? He asked House to make sure the guy was all there, and house said the patient was "better, we're discharging him". Wilson isn't exactly trying to course something out of the guy the same way House was.(not saying Wilson is above all judgement, just he's nowhere near as corrupt as House)

@@xaviercast970 You're missing the whole point the shows tries to make lmfao

Wilson is covetous. It's his main character flaw. If he's offered something, he takes it. House's friendship, an affair leading to a wife... a kidney.

Same ahhaha shame to see barely anyone even mentioned or noticed it ahahaha. Thats a mint show throughout too aint it 👍x

Just for a little while

So true

Suits too tight

zero context and it still sounds like a nightmare, hang in there 😅

The Long Game, you might want to change your footage number to 9:31. The footage number you gave (9.37) takes us to the end of the exchange, and we miss the dialogue you are referring to.

“I thought it was unethical to take money from sick people” “I change me mind” Everybody is moral until they are showed a pay check.

@@chrisjackson1889 I wouldn't mind doctors taking my money... *if* *I* *was* *actually* *sick* !

It sort of does. You should finish the whole thing. The episode plots aren’t always solely focused on a new case every episode.

season 4 is one of the best in my opinion.

@@statszone4047 Agreed.

Major changes in the last season. It sort of peaks in S4-S5, and continues to be great for a while, but the last season is a bit spotty. Recommend watching it through in any case.

A lot of things change, but to me the show never dips in quality. It's still the same at it's core, just different characters.

Actually, he showed one principle, which is the same of House when House advocated for a patient in front of a transplant committee despite thinking that they would be right to deny said patient from receiving a transplant: the principle of doing all he could for his patient because that is his job (like, though he didn't say it, a lawyer would defend someone even knowing he is guilty)

Wilson went completely hypocritical in this one..I just lost all respect for this character. To me he's just as corrupt as House.

@@xaviercast970 thats more than a little bit of an exaggeration lol. You realize the show is like 65% house doing currupt stuff, like Wilson being slightly(only slightly because he had no reason to believe the ex-patient wasn't in his right mind) hypocritical. Judge Wilson sure, say he's the same as House... ehhhhh

@@jamesmoniz5263 Once you go rogue as a doctor, you're done. Did you know that every doctor in this series has killed or got killed a patient to save another patient and/or a group of people.... in the name of good?

@@jamesmoniz5263 The issue is that there was a chance the patient wasn't in his right mind, and that chance was supposedly enough for House to not accept a donation from the guy (small compared to his actual wealth), but it was irrelevant when it was regarding a life-altering and potentially deadly surgery for someone else. Also, autonomy of the donor is one of the most important considerations for organ donation in the first place.

If you move out the US (if you aren't living here) your dream could become a reality! Best of luck you with everything health wise 🙏 ✨️

@@lostheartslostminds Did you mean to move out of the US or to move into the US? Because I live in America and the "American dream" isn't that simple.

U want to do these things but have u? Do u give away a majority of ur earnings? If not I wouldn’t worry. There’s a difference between being a bleeding heart liberal and this guy’s condition -Dr. Jamie, internet doctor 👨🏽‍⚕️

@@Jamietheroadrunner You're right, I don't think I have this condition, but I'm currently a student without an income, so I definitely don't have anything to give away. I totally would if I had the choice though, but I just think that's because I care a lot about strangers, not Whipple's.

Feels like fourth wall shattered. The patient from the episode broke his way into comments section. 😂. Just kidding, no offence

😂😂😂😂😂😂

without the "of" tho. ;-)

he’s also a really good swimmer because of fish dna

No, he was rich before prison

LMAOOOO

Do you know how much money is exploited from workers.

@@12halo3 Not as much as you think that’s for sure

@@hrothgr52 proven wage theft - not just speculative - is in fact the largest source of theft per year in the united states so.. yeah, it is in fact that much

@@danhonks6264 “define wage theft” because recently a lot of moronic socialists think not paying people as much as you can get away with and still make profit as theft.

@@hrothgr52 wage theft as defined by the us government involves not paying employees when you are legally required to, such as requiring employees under threat of being fired to clock in early without pay, or close late without pay This isn’t my opinion, this is from the department of labor.

The kids probably don't want to see him because he guilts them over their video games and won't do anything with them.

Women dont like kind men thats for sure

​@@j.d.714 Ironically, the original context of the quote has nothing to do with relatedness. The full quote is "The blood of the covenant is thicker than the water of the womb." In other words, it doesn't matter who you're related to, not even who birthed you, what matters is shared struggle and sworn oaths. Not sure if I fully agree with either position though.

​@@j.d.714 lmao of course you got racist at the end

@@shybandit521Chimps aren’t capable of complex thought

Absolutely not. Voluntary action and charity is how you solve problems. Not through State force.

​@@pinkkfloydd The Nordic countries have vastly lower unemployment, homelessness and more social mobility with their social programs then we do

@@zillafire101 They also have a vastly homogenous and low population, and in the case of Norway, oil. And their social programs couldn't have been effective without the economic measures these countries took to better their wealth.

@@pinkkfloydd Right, why would the government work for the people? That's insane. Laws have never made anything better, because people just solved every problem by themselves! If it wasn't a law, there wouldn't be things like wheelchair access to buildings.

Yeah, but that doesn't mean we should advocate for just letting it bleed. Something is better than nothing

Itd be better without the copulation

@@thedugdugman45 meh, that's a part of life, and House had a lot of episodes which were more about the real part of relationships and friendships and less about the medical event of the episode

MASH, after Blake leaves, those were still good but more corny.

Then you are either naive or a hypocrite or both. OF COURSE, your family/friends/loved ones (your circle) are more important and special to you, it's only natural to put them first and above everyone else. Grow up, honestly.

Yeah, what if her parents didn't work hard to get their children to a place where they could get a good education? Not everyone gets that leg up. She's a hypocrite.

Yep. And the complete ignorance that she's one of the luckiest people on this planet, that billions of people have worked harder than she ever had or ever will, and yet they still died in poverty.

What’s “too kind”?

Or read the giving tree

@@myway24454 being "too kind" would be like the guy in this clip: giving one of your vital organs to someone you've never met because it MIGHT make them better, that crosses the line from "very generous" to insane very quickly, another example i just thought of would be if you were to donate your entire life savings to a completely random African country or something like that, because again, that's like no longer kind, it's just naïve and stupid. It's because in both these examples your taking huge risks for no reward AND your donation might completely go to waste anyway, which is just irresponsible.

@@thekamotodragon because it doesn’t benefit them or it doesn’t benefit yourself?

@@myway24454 would u give me ur house, money and everything else u own?

She clone herself

They probably go, "good thing I had insurance" and pay a couple hundred a month for a year until it's paid off.

Yeah well don't get too excited...Park is the main character.

Everybody is moral until they are showed a pay check.

The whole point of the show was to showcase that his thinking was flawed, not objective. And being objective results in terrible things, one needs balance. You could argue objectively that doing anything for anybody but your own family is wrong, since you would objectively put your family at a much greater advantage. Objectively speaking, the whole point of life is to advance ones own house. Balance, as you can see, is key. And I personally would find that anybody that puts the needs\wants of their own children below that of others, is objectively a terrible parent.

My way of thinking, oversimplified as it may be, is basically this: If my parents made sure to give me a happy childhood and provided for all of my needs as well as many happy memories, I'm much more likely to want to repeat that process with my own children or other family members/friends. It's a much smaller circle than it would be if I handed out my savings to charity events, but it's one that I can see the direct impact of. I don't know if it qualifies as being selfish or not, but seeing the people close to me be happier individuals because of my contributions in turn makes me happier and more likely to want to do it again and they, in turn, will (hopefully) reciprocate. If I give my money to a charity, it may or may not be used to improve the lives of others suffering from whatever condition that charity is trying to remedy, but I don't feel that effect. I don't know if I'm helping or not. All I'm seeing is my own bank account being drained of money, supposedly (and again, hopefully) to the benefit of others, but even if it is, just the ethereal hope that I may be helping to improve the lives of people I don't know and will never meet doesn't do me much good. I would have to actively involve myself in charity events and personally lend them a hand to see the effect first hand. And unlike this guy, I (like most people) don't make the kind of money that can do both. If I have to pick between my family/friends or a group of strangers I'll never know or meet, then it's an easy choice. My family is responsible for giving me my happy memories and benefits, so when I grow up it's my obligation to return that favor. Family really does come first. Blood runs strong and it's extremely difficult to distance you from your emotions towards them and do the objectively more helpful thing. There's definitely a component of selfishness there, but it's selfishness that is extremely difficult to deny. How can you leave you own family in the lurch in favor of people you don't even know?

Do you enjoy being a monster.

Why should he get care and treatment when children elsewhere aren’t receiving care or treatment? It’s a retarded way of looking at it imo

Why not give food to all the animals that live on the wild? Deer, bears, chimpanzees, ducks. They live in complete poverty, they don't have access to health care, etc. Why draw the line at humans?

I am also a fellow Starbuck worker. You are correct, they really must get the coffee cups filled because they make coffee seem trival - when it is the most important part of the show.

@@malcolmblack717 once you start looking at coffee cups in shows, once you know they are almost always empty, it gets very distracting. They'll just swing around cups they just got, they'll do fake drinks from hot coffee, sometimes they'll just tip them in front of their lips. Very bad.

@@MDMDMDMDMDMDMDMDMD Yes, as I said ... you are correct. They are producing these shows without due care for OCD people like you and me. They are very bad.

@@malcolmblack717 ah. I thought by saying they were the most important part of the show you were being sarcastic

Season 8 was 2012 - that was 11 years ago. Do you not know about inflation and prices? ... Some people have no idea about work and money.

​@@malcolmblack717 or mayyybe his humorous comment was a means of commenting on the very inflation you're referring to?

@@scottmatheson3346 Kudos 🙂