The process of using Mathematica to solve real world problems is quite direct and intuitive. I guess there are a lot of hard work behind this to hide the boring details of machine level.

Well done, sir. I first got familiar with Mathematica back in 1990 with Mathematica 2.0. I will soon have Mathematica 12.1. Everything I learned thirty years ago is still valid. This program is cumulative. To my mind, nothing is thrown out. As such it is a very big program and no one will ever use all its features. Also, since this was one of the most pirated programs out there for a while, Wolfram introduced a few years back the the "hobbyist" edition for those of us who aren't students or professionals. We just want to explore with this very capable program and not come up with the big bucks this program is deserving of. My only wish is that Wolfram would come out with a paper edition of the manual. It ceased being published with the fifth edition. It would be very expensive and a true mathematic encyclopedia

Crazy that this has existed for so long I'm only now finding out about it.

Thank you sir... As an engineer this software has already fascinated me... And am looking forward to do some real good work with mathematica as I continue pursuing my Masters in Robotics

It is really awesome and very well explained. Thank you.

Excellent presentation, many thanks! I am excited that Mathematica comes with the Raspberry Pi 3 Raspbian distribution.

For those who want to know how to get fully symbolic indices: \:2080 through \:2089 gives subscript 0 through subscript 9. Those act like any other character and Mathematica doesn’t treat them specially. So if you just want symbols with subscripts in their names - that’s how. Otherwise, - gives you “real” indices that define functions behind your back. Sometimes that’s desirable eg when using indicial notation.

Very nice program! Thanks for sharing an excellent description of it!

Another way of seeing it is by recognizing that engineering is all applied math, so having a solid mathematical processing environment can’t but help a lot :)

Do you happen have the source for the MATLAB toolbox list? Working on a business case for Mathematia and it would be helpful

Probably the most underrated language

I am learning these tools to understand and study the Wolfram Physics Model !!! I found this video very practical and helpful and am very grateful ! i wish I had this at college!!! Here in Australia every kid should be taught this!! It is so good it feels like cheating! I am watching everything you have made now!!!

I wish I could DSolve my real life problems too. Great presentation! :D

A powerful presentation for a powerful product which I’ve enjoyed since it first came out. The “steep learning curve” argument often made is offset by the powerful tools that just do the job and the documentation and executable example library. I’m working with teachers to get Stephen and Conrad’s vision to young people. We have to do things differently than the 18th century.

Blessings for future . Just hat's off for those who are working so hard to bring this on this planet. One day its going to become world's best interactive language. Because of its very very much like ; the problem is given by teacher and i have just write give data and useful equation. This language is like FUTURERASTIC of matlab,python,c++... Can you please make some courses on coursera or edx on so all backgrounds of reserchive person get help . Awesome👏✊👍

How to calculate curve's involutes in Mathematica Wolfram?

Thats pretty cool!!

A great program.

Sir kindly solve boundary value problems with more than 3 parameter in ode. For eg momentum and angular momentum equation..

thanks

awesome

Sir, thanks for the much informative video. I want to know the more basic book on Mathematica which has the detail for plot in advance physics. thanks

Sir can you explain RK method in mathematics.

Convinced. **

19:40 - like for the programs list.

Hello good evening, I am trying to solve the following logarithm with wolfram mathematica but I can't get the program to give me a solution: Log2[X = 6] is 64 but I can't get the program to give me that solution, how do I do it as is the syntax that should i put??

What is the software you use ? Thank you. The problem is : everybody talks about wolfram language, BUT I don't know WHERE to find it...

Man that was cool!

What means expression x[t_] = % [[1,1,2]], at 15:45 ?

Where is it free? I'm a self-teaching senior on low income and don't see it free anywhere.

what programming software to make mathematica? and what software did they use to create that programming software? just wondering, could someone solve this paradox? thx in advance

Justin Pearson, Thanks for a great talk, your "An Introduction to Mathematica and the Wolfram Language for Engineers" on KZfaq. I am a newbie with this so it's not really an Engineering question. I am fascinated by some of the examples you give: e.g. your "Petunias" table, and also the graph of a web site that went s.t. like this: 1) Import["www.stephenwolfram.com","Hyperlinks"] 2) Graph[Flatten[Rest[NestList[Union[Flatten[Thread[#->,Import[#,"Hyperlinks"]]&/@Last/@ #]]&,{""-]>"www.stephenwolfram.com"},2]]]] I think I have the syntax right from KZfaq, but I keep getting: Syntax::sntxf: "Thread[#->" cannot be followed by ",Import[#,Hyperlinks]]". Right now I am using Wolfram on a Raspberry Pi, and I just wanted to know if one needs to have some different access level to Mathematica to resolve this? I appreciate you might be busy and it's all right if you can't reply, Michael Cook m06orama@gmail.com

Sir how to create a list of even number, prime and composite numbers in three different ways

Mathematica和Matlab的图标其实在互别苗头啊。一个是离散的高度对称刺球象征符号处理，一个是光滑曲面象征解PDE。

that last example with concert tickets was pretty extra lol

Can somebody tell me what is the meaning of the symbol % in mathematica

Doesn't Matlab also have a symbolic solve function? Don't get me wrong, I liked the video; but I don't think the example was that impactful.

Please enable /Subtitles/Transcript/Communtity Translations/ K, Thx

just for more pation you need deep music whene you talk .

I got a new raspberry pi to try this thing out...

wolfram is the best

sin(x)=x period

They're obviously not making publicity to an apple product.

It’s tending towards unbridled rage

Rage comics in the year 2016 JHC

Useful but it still only gives you the answer. It doesn't show you how to get the answer.

Its free on raspberry pi!

Didn’t it come out in the 90s?

i am from bangladesh

Sorry, Justin - I addressed my question to the wrong person - please ignore my email.

I wouldn't call changing a second order ODE to a first order system of ODEs 'contorting the way you think about the problem' and 'very different than how students see things in their math courses'. In fact, there is much physical insight to be gained by re-writing it this way. I think it obscures what is otherwise a very valid point regarding (1) using the right tool for the right job and (2) that there is a trade-off between user friendliness and how much control you have over what is under the hood. Also, Matlab has gui tools like simulink and mupad, and it doesnt take much sophistication to write nice wrapper modules that abstract the problem. Finally: not everything is as easy as solving ODEs analytically. PDEs, optimization problems, stochastic problems,... they do not have nice, analytical solutions. Students should learn how to harness *both* the power of a general tool like Mathematica *and* a powerful numerical tool like Matlab.

Just use Sagemath, it is open-source and free.

this guy 100% doesn't dress like this on the daily

hahahah add Java and C++ to the list 🤣

and that is why you fail. like the president can't concentrate on stuff.