This is hands down the best video about camera lenses, focal lengths, crop factors and filmmaking that I think exists on KZfaq

Most valuable video. Ur so underrated!!! Pls don’t stop uploading 😭😭😭❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️

The split-diopter shot at 0:43 is very cool, nice job Tito.

So much value in your videos. Can’t believe this is available for free on KZfaq. Well done

Lol that was a great short opening. Good to see you showing off more of VanCity

I truly enjoy how this is a full out educational piece and lens set advice. Originally I thought this was a gear showcase video. But it got an actual narrative piece which is so rare to find in what others call "review". Now I want to watch more videos that I skipped on your channel.

this was a great watch. very informative and fantastic production. great job by all who were involved!

These videos is just another level

Wow! What a hell of a video, Tito! A had a ton of questions about MARS and now they are finally answered 🙏

this is gonna blow up man, a video like this is so sought after!!!! thank you!!

Directed my first film on anamorphic this year using sirui lenses. We rented a 35 and a 100 and ended up shooting almost the entire thing on the 35. We loved the look! We were going sci-fi so anamorphic was a no-brainer, but it really elevated the film. Wonderful times to be an anamorphic enthusiast. Thanks Tito for yet another wonderful video!

This is sick! Great job on all aspects of this video.

One of your best videos Tito! So comprehensive!

Thanks for this video TITO!

Really happy to stumblet on to this channel :D gread video. Keep up the good work :)

Luv the short!!

Man, you really did huge job , thank you for real 🙏

your channel definitely deserves more recognition! this video was so informative and well structured. you can just tell Tito really has a passion for filmmaking and loves the craft.

Very informative! I have only ever shot stills. You make me want to try video.

I Thank you for the content you create!

your best video yet!!!

The beginning is rad!!

Merci pour cet excellent travail acharné et de qualité ❤Je ne comprend pas tout mais je suis grâce à vous moins ignorant. Bravo 👏🏿 Merci pour les liens et outils mis à disposition. 👍🏾

fantastic video!!!!!!!

simply a great intro-video : nice filmic realization, very nice story;-) ! .. followed by a good explanation, again - as every time. thx !

Great Video.. Im a "New Fan"... Cant wait to review more of your Channel Videos...

The clock in the beginning is literally a SCP LOL You never fail to deliver, Fam. Appreciate your channel! I gotta upgrade my subscription level asap

Dude the shot at 18:35 is just so majestic. Like why is no one talking about this

1:15 - the 2.39:1 pun wasn't lost on me

that opening scene tho!!💯

This short is so cool🙌❤️, did you guys use blender or after effects for him disappearing?

Item #: SCP-███ Object Class: Safe Interation with a SCP-███ is observed to be fatal. The victim is disintegrated then absorbed into SCP-███. Under no circumstances should containment personal press SCP-███'s red button.

17:11 "And [dof] is a pretty big difference that crop factors don't take into account." Respectfully, as I understand it, crop factor DOES take depth of field into account, when also applied to the f-stop (a critical omission most people make). A hypothetical 33 mm f/2 lens, when mounted on a 1.5x crop APS-C sensor, has the same field of view and depth of field that a 50 mm f/3 lens would have when mounted on full-frame. Of course mounting a lens on a different sensor does not physically change the lens at all (in focal length OR in aperture); we are talking about the factor you need to multiply to obtain a *different* lens that renders a similar image (in terms of *both* DoF and FoV) on a different-sized sensor. EDIT: the specific math for this falls naturally out of the DoF formula, `DoF = 2(u^2)N*c / (f^2)` where u = subj. distance, N = f-stop, c = circle of confusion limit, and f = focal length. We assume identical subj. distance and so get DoF ~ N*c / (f^2). Because c has to change with sensor diagonal for identical sharpness, it is normal and customary to adjust it by the crop factor (e.g. 1.5x). So to get identical DoF when changing focal length by crop factor and c by crop factor, we also need to change N by the crop factor! E.g. DoF ~ N*c/(f^2) = (1.5*N)*(1.5*c) / ((1.5*f)^2). We get (1.5^2) on the top and bottom canceling out - but ONLY if we apply crop factor to the f-stop in addition to the focal length.

A note, Spielberg favors spherical lenses around 21mm but when working anamorphic, shoots an a 40 most of the time. Alternatively, Wes Anderson and his DP shot Bottle Rocket spherically and used only the 27mm the entire movie. They then used a 40mm when shooting anamorphic.

Hi Tito. I am a fan and subscriber. Question, how does these Surui compare to the Laowa Nanomorph lens in quality and use on a mft43 set up.

the rules are there for a good reason, but they're also made to be broken --and I always wanted to say that 😆first lol while watching your vid, this is a very very well done class, thanks 👏👏👏it's kind of a reverse clickbait, where I was expecting a gear comparison video, it turns into a very informative deep dive into the anamorphic world, great job Tito

nice, 238. the gadget itself looked realistic, more so than the acting but still funny

What about using the EOS R 8K resolution? The 8K video uses the 36x18.98mm area of the sensor, Super 35 uses around 24.89x18.67 giving room to the 22.4x18.67mm area of a 6:5 anamorphic area needed for a 2.40:1 result, 5098x4248px that can be squeezed to 10196x4248px and then downsampled to 3840x1600px for UHD delivery... But... Which anamorphic lenses are available for the EOS R ecosystem?

You disserve more

What's happening at 8:54 around your forehead? Export issue? Great video as usual thanks.

The amount of shots it took to get that box to fall the way you wanted. Dedication. I'd probably have chucked it over a hedge by that point.

Your channel is absolutely the most informative about anamorphic shooting 🙂 I am considering buying the Sirui lenses and I am doing some math. Technically, not financially, hahaha I use the factor 0.75 to calculate the focal length needed on an MFT camera relative to an S35 camera (50mm*0.75 = 37.5mm) . But when I compare it with the anamorphic format of a S35 film camera (2.35:1), I have to consider an additional factor of 2 to get the same HFOV. Is that correct? Example: A 50mm spherical lens on an S35 camera has a similar horizontal field of view as a 37.5 mm lens on an MFT camera (50*0.75). The 1.85:1 format on S35 cameras is vertically cropped (if I am correct). A 50mm anamorphic lens on an S35 camera would have 2X the angle of view horizontally, since the camera uses a 1.195:1 ratio to shoot 2X stretched (2.35:1 format). To have the same HFOV, I would need to use an 18.75mm spherical lens on an MTF camera (50*0.75/2) or in the case of the Sirui, a 24mm lens (50*0.75/2*1.33). Is this correct?

What do you prefer for MFT and anamorphic? P4K or Panasonic?

17:24 Could you use Sirui's MFT bayonet adapter rings that were initially designed for their APS-C suitable lenses on the MARS set? If so you could mount the MARS set onto an APS-C with a very minimal addition of distance from the sensor.

Great video again but the with is still confusing... I have the 'normal' MFT Sirui 35, 50 and 75. I also have a big heavy old Sony 0.70 front lens of a camcorder that works quite well in front of the 35mm with an ND filter in between. Yes, that was quite a Eureka moment, I turn the front lens to adjust the ND filter :-) Am I right I am getting 24,5 mm that way? Or, when I put my brand new anamorphot 1.33 / 40 in front of my 7Artisans 25 1.7 or cheap pany 25 1.7 (both work very well but I prefer the manual control of the 7Artisans), I get almost the result of a Sirui 24?

Sirui mars + bgh1 how about this combination? 20:15 century optics? what product?

obviously

Por que no..? Todos !!!!

Great video but you missed one thing when talking about different sensors. The depth of field is always the same for a given focallength at the same distance whatever sensor you have, it´s physics. It is when you change the distance to the subject that the depth of field changes. Since you get a 2x crop with m4/3-sensors you have to back away to get the same framing but the depth of field doesn't change just because you change camera/sensor size. I know you know this and have mentioned it in other videos but you missed it here.

great video, very informative. Next time be careful with dates when the movies were released. :) Dark knight - 2008 Goodfellas 1990

👍🏾🙏🏾

✨️✨️✨️

O curta do começo me lembrou a câmera escondida do "É 1 papapá"

Awesome instructional video. One of your best ones! People waste money on film school, when they should just watch your videos and then use their film school tuition money to fund their next film projects. haha.

Acts 2:38

Ahhh... haven't heard bullshit debunked so satisfyingly in a long time. (I live in America)

...its the score I give your acting skills out 1000! jk

Sirui - no longer spherical and almost anamorphic.

Well that short is an old joke about hole in a fence.

Boy, Sirui spent a lot of money on this ad.