I'm so sick of fake smart people 🤦🏿‍♂️ she's unbearable

I love how she uses HR and mid-management as examples of "how women are better at organizing people"... When HR and mid-management are literally two of the biggest cancers in pretty much every organization.

Jordan Peterson said it best " why do women only want equality in power and pay but not In the job itself?"

“If civilization had been left in female hands we would still be living in grass huts.” - Camille Paglia (feminist, scholar, author and cultural critic)

She is a gender studies graduate. They have basically corrupted academia😂😂😂

Women can't even support the WNBA players.

“Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.” Robert A. Heinlein

I don't agree that empathy is a femine trait

Its exhausting to watch people argue in a circle without evidence or examples. The way she takes micro examples and tries to apply them over macro principles is so flawed.

Once again we have young "educated" women using a bunch of four syllable words to say absolutely nothing.

The “ patriarchy “ was better at hunting, building and defense. Not just war. Women and the men’s offspring literally owe their SURVIVAL to MEN.

“I’m on onlyfans, but I’M SMART!” The desperate justification😂

She read a few books and subsequently declared herself an authority on all of human history.

If it's a feminine trait to organise and keep families and society together why are women responsible for 70 to 80% of divorces?

The further we go back in history, the more dominant men are in society. It's not up for debate

If that girl was the general of an army, it would surely get destroyed.

She spent 10 minutes arguing literally nothing. She just wanted to show off her vocabulary 😂

Andrew is a real intelligent person talking to a fake, intelligent person. He can explain high concept ideas to a regular person in regular terms. Notsoerudite has a very big vocabulary and a large amount of knowledge but very little understanding of the subjects she speaks about. She uses ten dollar words to mask her two dollar intellect.

She says she wasn’t arguing mass organization is a feminine trait? Had me fooled.

When you keep staring at the ceiling and every other word is "like," you have nothing

We wouldn't even need HR if it weren't for women. Thanks a lot for that.

Erudite shamelessly reaches so hard to drive home a point that doesn’t move the conversation at all. I hate it

She's just begging the question. She refuses to accept the fact that she's assuming that which she's yet to prove. 'Organization is feminine because it's feminine to organize' is all she's got.

That season of "The Island" that was men v women proves this young woman wrong in a very graphic way. The women couldn't organize sufficiently to make shelter, gather/hunt food, or even navigate. They completely ignored the 2 women on the team that had actual knowledge and experience in favor of arguing with each other. In the end, several of the women had to be evacuated for medical reasons, and the rest required direct intervention by the production company to stay alive. By contrast, within the first 48 hours, the men had shelter, were already establishing roles in their community, were hunting and fishing, and basically settling in for the long haul. They never received ANY outside assistance, no one required evacuation, and while there was some tension, they were able to work through the issues to be successful. Even when, half way through the series, they took half the men and half the women, and switched them to the other team, the female dominant team still could not organize, overriding the men who came to them at every opportunity. The women who joined the male dominant team settled in to their roles and prospered. Women, on the whole, are great organizers WITHIN THE FAMILY, but they often fail when reaching beyond that. There are women who are outliers, but they are called outliers for a reason. I would be unsurprised to learn that the author of the book she was trying to reference was a sociology expert, and possibly one of those exposed by the hoax papers showing that all one has to do is use the right buzzwords to get a paper published, even if the work is complete garbage. Oh, and as for any matriarchal societies that may have existed, the only one that I can think of is a Scythian group that may have been the inspiration for the Amazons of Greco-Roman mythology. They didn't last very long according to the little archaeological evidence that can be found.

She's arguing something that's completely unprovable. She's arguing from ignorance.

"I have no historical data or evidence to back up anything I'm saying but this is what I think" is her entire argument.

She spouts all the words & hides behind her education, but can't name any 'facts' to support her arguments.

5:44 Her argument is built on "If organization and social cohesion and empathy" are (1) the basis of society and (2) are feminine. *First: Organization is NOT a feminine quality.* - The feminine form of organization is related to neatness, aesthetics, form, presentation. A mother will make an organized home because is it pleasing. The masculine form of organization is a functional structure, e.g., how A affects & interacts with B. A man uses his visuospatial aptitude to connect things and concepts across space and time, and then they use their disposition for object-focus to optimize them based on quantitative metrics. Men's ability to focus on one thing at a time allows them to compartmentalize each subject to address it. That is the "organization" of societies. Consider the analogy of the "nothing box"--men's brains are a vast repository of boxes, each containing a subject/topic (including a box with has "nothing"). Conversely, women's brains are a knot of Christmas lights, a web browser with 100 tabs open. They don't access one topic without also simultaneously accessing every other topic connected to it (and the topics connected to them, etc.). - Men are solution-focused because they are better at "organizing" problems. - Men are more mindful of the future (men invest more, build things future generations benefit from, etc.) because their organization of subjects/concepts better allows for long-ranging plans. This one aspect is why masculine societies survive & prosper while feminine societies consume themselves. - A feminine corporation/organization does not scale in size because everyone works with & interacts with everyone else. It is sensitivity-focused, e.g., making people feel good, welcomed, involved, important. A masculine organization/corporation is highly structured, focused, segmented, result-driven. Masculine organization scale because the structure is copy-able & repeatable. Any large society will be masculine because that's the only way to have order over a large scale over time, while feminine societies struggle above the size of a tribe. *Second: Fostering and maintaining social cohesion are separate things.* - Social cohesion, meaning people doing things to get along with each other, certainly is feminine in that is involves empathy, partnership, cooperation, dialog, etc. However, for a society, enforcing social cohesion and making people do it is masculine. Like organization, the feminine cannot expand across sufficient space & time to have a cohesive society. Even in the US, each state has different social issues, concerns, and solutions for dealing with it. What keeps them unified is authoritative leadership, not perpetual negotiation. *Third: Empathy is not a part of organization.* - It just isn't, and your feelings don't change that. *Fourth: The basis of society is NOT organization but rather conquest.* - A culture is created not from coming together and getting along--it comes from conquest, i.e., bettering others across many facets such that your ideas, values, ways of doing things, etc., become imposed on them and they accept it. That's masculine. - If you have a organization that needs to change its "corporate culture," it is accomplished by a strong figure defining the way forward, leading, gaining respect, demanding others follow, enforcing consequences, etc. It is NOT accomplished by discussion, empathy, forming affinity groups, etc. - The formation/expansion of a society requires leadership, and that requires risk-taking. Cultures have "origin myths" which typically involve a hero/leader with a vision who takes bold action and accomplishes great feats: the American Revolution, Romulus & Remus, Moses, Jebediah Springfield. The origin myth defines a common set of values, objectives, morality, etc., for the society. Without an origin myth based on these masculine characters & feats, the society doesn't survive for societies larger than tribes.

Did she say "When Grandma dies the family is fucked . . . . . . . . ." - No stoopid, the family carries on as it always has. Families tend to go on for longer than 3 generations. What an asinine statement.

This is actually ironic because her screen name "NotSoErudite" is actually very fitting. "Erudite" by definition is: having or showing great knowledge or learning. So her being "Not so great at knowledge or learning" is very fitting here.

What a total pain. She changed her argument completely. It started as matriarchal then became about men with feminine traits.

All these women need to spend a full year, in a full survival situation.

Someone told Erudite she was smart once, and she's run with it ever since. She made absolutely no sense at all.

HR is a make work position to facilitate an artificial gynocracy. It justifies both the worthless degree mills and giving women control over male productivity

The fact that she can't make eye contact with the man she's debating with shows she knows everything she's saying is bull shit

Plenty of studies have been done in the modern working fields and EVERYTiME, both men and women state they prefer working under men’s leadership than women…. EVERYTiME

Hr is not one of the most important human organisations. It's malignant

Hey erudite. I work in corporate development, so i tell companies how to work better. One of my first targets is always HR because it's an almost entirely pointless industry. It's almost always a massively bloated bottomless moneypit that is an extremely poor substitute for actual 'man management'. Most companies I deal with can safely fire 70% of their HR staff with no repercussions at all, and if they want to fire another 20% they just need some very basic automation to replace it. These depts are almost entirely made up of female staff (some 95 and upwards percent). They are a very bad example of the usefullness of matriarchies or female organisational ability.

The word empathy is also wrongly attributed to mostly women, when they are the gender who will leave a man who is lacking because they need to look up to and not down to a man. In the reverse, a man will take care of a helpless woman. A woman won’t do that for long, they at best have much less empathy and thats only one of many examples.

Shes been reading up on those books from the paleolithic period on how they structured society

Her argument is before there was written history there were matriarchal societies?! So she can’t prove it because it’s completely theoretical.

The level of gynocentric programming we've been exposed to: traits of women are loving, co-operative, considerate, trusting= all false.

If this was the first time seeing the chick with the choker, I’d think she was blind and just forgot her sunglasses. The way she moves, gesticulates, and looks up and around while attempting to form a coherent thought, is beyond odd and seems forced and performative.

Implying Leadership is not associated with organisation or social cohesion. Yep. I'll just leave that head scratcher here.

When she gets put in a corner she changes the definition of the discussion.

Matriarchy: Rises due to civilization decay. Another Patriarchy: It's free real estate.

She unironically deserves her pseudonym.

"they did but I don't know any names" LOL

She argues in other debates that men are angry, violent, and dangerous but simultaneously argues that men need to be more emotional. Make it make sense.

The way she says things with such confidence while being 100% incorrect and uneducated is crazy.

Can anyone ever say they've had a Female Manager that they didn't despise?

She brought up HR - the do-nothing, diversity-hire, productivity-wrecking department - as an example of how women organize?

She quotes Noah Harari as an academic intellectual??? What a joke!!!!

You can feel my anger level tip up just a tiny bit any time someone mentions the burning of the library at Alexandria😅

You can see modern-day matriarchies. Just go to any inner city, and you'll see just how peaceful, productive, and successful they are. Ignore the fact that it takes literal government force to fun those matriarchies....

Is it me or did she change her point every single time he proved her wrong.

Andrew is very good at forcing his opponents to stick to their stated positions and bear with the ramifications. You can almost feel NotSoDestiny trying to weasel out of her position and conflate it with something else but Andrew kept her locked there until her argument shriveled up.

I used to fight in karate tournaments. After fighting hard won battles men would shake hands and hug. Women on the other hand were much more willing to hold a grudge and be bitter after losing a match. This opened my eyes to logic vs emotion and the great thing that men are arbiters of war and NOT women.... Empathy? not so much...

Organization Definition: An association or society of persons whose efforts are coordinated for a particular work or purpose. Members of an organization are united by administrative arrangements and by standards or requirements.

I like the girl next to Andrew. She always smiles when she knows Andrew is about to spit the truth!

3:06 Men socially organize in hierarchies while women typically don't. I would consider that a masculine trait in the ways in which we structure and organize societies.

Never seen somebody "moving the goalpost" this much just seem intelligent. 😮

It is weird how intellectualism is no longer about the pursuit of truth It has become about the pursuit of personal 'TRUTH' Truth should be curative, like salt can be painful Untruth is pure escapism from pain

"Patriarchy isn't inherently biological, it's just more competitive..." lmao, then it's inherently biological!

4:12 New word drop : Backstabbery..😂

One of the best things about working heavy commercial union construction is there was NO HR dept. You get into with a guy you either hash it out on tge job or in the parking lot.

Hilarious She would think women are ever in control except for when we let them

I like how she quotes Yuval Harari like he's not one of the most evil, misanthropic psychopaths on the planet today

Man she really believes she’s smarter than she is

Is it easyer to organise 1000 women or 1000 men for a specific purpose to work togeather to complete a task or face a threat or challenge.

Now she is just reaching for anything to be right

Why can't the women who complain about patriarchy just make their own civilization from zero and live there to build their own matriarchy if they can?

If the men in this country said we quit it would collapse.

‘You gotta let me finish’ whilst refusing to let Andrew finish 🙈

Me: Are you in pain? Her: No. Me: Then it must not hurt to be stupid!

The “logic”, lack of examples, and anecdotes. Oof. Her: Women are great at organizing, just look at my closet and my social calendar! There were paleo matriarchies, none that I can name, but I will cite a book that makes me look well read on the subject.

8:56 both girls faces say this: "Oh Lord stfu up already!!"

Freeze frame at 3:05. That's a tableau to sadden the heart.

Erudite is a destiny clone. She has also picked up on Andrew's style. Like asking Andrew "what's my argument ". Erudite, atop with that annoying cadence when you talk. Also, thet ridiculous hand gestures and looking up in the sky. She's a grifter.

So her proof that they were matriarchies Are before written record that she can’t name and this is her proof that matriarchies work?

"I'm like smart because like societies like subscribe to like feminine organisational like traits."

4:29 that happened with my great grandfather.

She is good at arguing just to argue. Arguing while not really saying anything. All those words just to say her opinion is that social organizing is a feminine trait. Lol

we dont live in a patriarchy, but we need to go back to it, or we are done.

Strangely is never hear an argument on how to improve together in an emancipated way from any woman...

I totally read the title as “crushes ON” 🤣

she read one book and now shes a scholar

Shes clearly a destiny fan girl. Trying to make sense out of her nonsensical argument.

Looking at the ceiling while doing mental gymnastics is very telling

Moving the goal post . This is what women do to win the argument to no avail.

This is the problem when you go to school and just memorize things but didn't learn anything.

Feminine traits that she forgot on her list: drama, emotional breakdowns, cattiness, manipulation

sounding intelligent does not mean you are intelligent.

She lost me at like 8:00 when she tried to imply that people's opinions in writing are a better determining factor in classifying "organization skills" as a masculine/feminine trait than simply observing who tended to take on those roles in historical practice.

Hierarchy is a definitive masculine trait and organizations run optimally on hierarchies.

Men organize formal relationships. Women organize informal relationships.

Funny to see the girls around her smile when she stated her case. But their smiles faded quick when he systematically dismantled everything she said with facts. Lol

Ah shes using the "trust me brah" arguement

" I don't know what I Want/Need!" - Person who should be in charge of organizing

“I actually don’t know the names of any Paleolithic cultures specifically… “ “But you do know that there was matriarchs in them?” “ABSOLUTELY.” F**king priceless.