Not really. A fetus and baby are used separately because they're separate things. Same thing for cis and trans people. The only people who don't understand they're different are the ones too stupid to learn.

All fetuses IDENTIFY as BABIES ... checkmate lunatics, lol.

You nailed it! 👏

I don’t subscribe to the trans crap but I am pro choice. You can call it a fetus, a baby, or whatever you want. It doesn’t actually matter. Abortion is about bodily rights. No one has the right to use your body without consent which includes a fetus. Let’s say that a 3 year old was in need of part of a kidney transplant. Should we create laws that “force” the mother of that child to give part of her kidney? I realize that most mothers would willingly do this but thats beside the point….. I’m asking if we should “force” the mother? Because you seem to be in favor of forcing the mother to allow a fetus to use her body….. so shouldn’t the 3 year get the same right?

Most accurate comment I've seen all day💯

Amen this woman is either a bad troll or really that dumb 😂

I was going to say the same thing.

hey if children have to die in the process... so be it! I mean does she look like she cares?! Of course not... its only children after all.

​@matheuscaneta1194 they wouldnt be able to have sex without the consequences then.

He could have pointed out that the two have been synonymous for all of history until psychopaths realized they lost the abortion argument to science. Now, they are using the communist tactic of changing the definition to fit their narrative. You can’t simply remove their human sacrifice ritual.

That's why murder falls under the term "HOMicide" and not "PERSONicide" Homo → Human Persona → Social identity

So, are there any real cases where abortion is necessary to save the woman's life? I personally think that women needing abortion to save their life is really hyped by the MSM.

Facts don't affect people with this level of delusion and immorality.

She's sick

unbelievably narcissistic. That we can murder babies... even at 42 weeks if the child's birth is delayed she's saying that it would be right for abortion.

definitely not , i don't agree with her standards BUT , the reasoning hold the line . if it's in abortion range it's not murder even in criminal cases . so in short her statement is "not born" not a human (yet) , since murder concerns human, her reasoning is totally logical . So the main problem here is "the abortion range", and the crossing line about it . "a human being regarded as an individual" (took the definition from a dictionnary)

@@gabrob3449 She just allowed herself to be trapped into a corner. No consistency at all. She lacked the maturity or intelligence to engage in any nuanced analysis whatsoever. So the child doesn't exist at 41 weeks (one week over) but is yet to be born.? But exists one minute after birth? Nonsense argument. Also she wouldn't consider it murder if someone deliberately injured a pregnant woman so the baby died? Doesn't she understand that might embolden some exboyfriends not wanting to pay child maintenance. Of course its murder. Because of her inexperience, immaturity and lack of human awareness, she highlighted the dangers of being an ideological zealot. I don't think its a sickness. Its just ignorance and brainwashing.

@@gabrob3449 She tried to pretend that her view will never lead to abortions up to full term. But we know in other countries its already up to 30 weeks and they're wanting to extend it. And abortions do occur. Its all about her being so obsessed with her ideology, that she refuses to connect with real people and the real world. Her thoughts are more important than people.

No one taught them about consequences so they don't think about this when they let Chad and Tyrone rawdog them.

Her feelings are far more important that objective fact.

other women are not only ok with this but pushing this agenda forward... you all think women are these pure innocent creatures when this literally couldn't be further from the truth. They will kill their own children in order to make their own lives easier and they will try to sell you the idea of 'Ohhh I did it because I was thinking of the child!'

Some women aren't interested in pregnancy or childbirth.

@@megankissinger8269 are they interested in children's welfare and killing kids or is society a free for all out there??

And women wanting sex without consequence just translates into them wanting to be men.

And pro life is a euphemism for I want to control other people’s lives while making no financial contribution to it… also don’t raise my taxes.

Worse they want to be applause for it , heck they don't even want to be question for it . If you do your the monster

You had your choice 9 months ago (SA excluded)

Nah, it's none of your business. It's just that simple

these bithes crahzy

I'd argue it's not "her" ideology. This mentality has been peddled by degen ideolgues for decades.

They have no shame

Why is it unbelievable? It's right there in front of you to witness, how do you not "believe" something that's right in front of you? She really did say the things she said and she really acted the way she acted, there's nothing to "believe", it's a fact.

The face of evil

You are a man. You don't understand women's lives and shouldn't try to.

100%

Andrew is a douchbag!

This girl deserves to think about her horrible position.

"Not one step back"

agreed. pulling the roots out for everyone to see.

Correcto

Yes

She's a minion. The monsters are the ones that got her to think this way and actually beleive its virtuous

@@rp-2fno you’re still a monster if you’re doing monster things. I think that argument doesn’t apply because dudes would not be excused for this. They’d say no they’re adults and should have known better. Women are the only ones excused for their horrific acts like they’re the infants they’re trying to murder.

That doesn’t happen. An abortion at that stage of development is nothing to do with killing and all to do with separating.

but she's pretty

Eh​@@johntsingis

nor humility

@@johntsingis so she should stick to what she's good at.

​@@johntsingis pretty stupid

Well you know who they voted for and look where we are now

White people?

They really shouldnt. Individual women can be smart but when groups of women get together they become children. Allow them to vote but disallow any women-only institution. This murderous ideology only came abiut from privileged women insulated in colleges in civilized areas. If a man isnt there to ground them they will come up with such selfish and destructive philosophies

Yeah it shouldn't be based either on man or woman or just being alive. There is a couple of good ways I think. If you're a tax payer IE putting more into the system than taking out you can vote. If you work in the public sector or government no voting for you. This goes for teachers, non-profits, government workers or contractors like working for DoD or any alphabet agency no voting for you.

She can't even defend her opinions. She just has her opinions for no reason. I would hope that she wasn't my lawyer if we ever went to court because she couldn't defend a fart in an elevator.

Communism is that with an economic/scientific wrapping. Feminism is the women's branch. And the greens are wrapped in a flowery cloak. But it is all the same religion.

Yep, he just shifts your focus to completely only caring about yourself. She thinks she cares about other women, but she doesn’t, she only cares about the women and people that confirm her same viewpoints. Satan came after women in Eden and he’s doing it again.

I actually kept thinking you have to be indwelled by an evil entity to utter what she is uttering

It's not ignorance, it's psychopathy. I've had this debate many times over with women. They know it's killing but do not want to give up the power they have over life and death.

Yeah true just look at her but Andrew gives me chomo vibes he probably touches his kids

Especially at close to term. That's how far this argument was stretched.

So why does the law see the death of the unborn baby as murder in one situation but not in the other.?

@@davidmoore2308 Because it's arbitrary /sarc.

@@davidmoore2308 Cause u can "see" that a pregnant woman is pregnant (most of the time) so it's a worse crime, and maybe to condamn efficiently illegal abortion ? Good question anyway , and this point should be discussed in order to make valid laws on that matter .

@@gabrob3449 so if you can see a women is pregnant that makes the baby a person.

I think she is brainwashed and thinks she is the righteous one here. You shouldn't call her evil. There is an element of puritan about her. But she speaks like a zealot that can't properly answer questions unless she can frame all the answers according to her ideology. She seems nice enough, but so adamant to stand by her ideology that she can't answer a basic moral question. No different to fanatics that join cults and think and do all these crazy things. I reckon in the future if she has kids and matures she mightn't be too proud of what she's said. The brainwashing is obvious in her, because she's young and inexperienced. She's struggling to answer basic questions and struggling to fit them within her ideology, instead of actually answering a fundamental human rights and ethical question.

totally agree!

This woman is a monster and heartless.

@@alantriplett304 I think her views are monstrous. I think she can't see or care about the human impact of all her theories. It may be immaturity or perhaps there is a sociopathy. I can understand your heartless comment. Its all about her theories first and foremost. Real life and people seem to get in the way and aren't as important to her. So probably a narcissist and lacking in humility. But monster is a bold claim.

@@Yum676 I wouldn't say evil. But the consequences of her actions are the issue. Her ideology is the most important thing for her. There isn't any caring about the impacts on humans. She can't and won't remove herself from her strictly applied theories on life. Like a fundamentalist zealot she can't relate to the real world and instead parrots views to maintain her ideological stance. Sad really. For her and others.

Like the guy said personhood in the first place is a nothingburger word. It's just a tool to conveniently make their point when they deem it convenient

Women like this crave power and blood, the way they exercise it over the most innocent and vulnerable people shows that they would have no remorse if they could become arbiters over adults as well. They become judges to punish fathers. They become politicians to erode human rights. They become writers to rhetorically tear down every principle that upholds society. If they could obtain the power to determine which adults are or are not "persons" then all would witness their total depravity.

I will be your demon in hell

She's pure evil.

stop this religious bullshit please, it hinders an open mind for the arguments of the other side

Andrew doesn’t believe in GOD 😂😂 and you support him lmao you’re just as bad as her brain

That is literally what she said. I will draw the line with no explanation whatsoever.

"It's not mur der the day before, because I want to do it." That is what she means but will not say. When she says, "You have to make the distinction somewhere", the distinction she makes is based solely on what is convenient for her. Ultimately, no moral, ethical or biological considerations seal the deal: what she wants is the determining factor. This is, indeed, the epitome of D fem "logic".

Most of them are like that.🤣

If she was the pregnant woman, one day before her baby was to be born (due date), and she was assaulted, resulting in the baby’s death, you can bet the farm that she would want the charge to be murder….

She already has a change of heart. It's obvious she knows it's murder. She's just doing the teenage "it's not my problem" routine. Hopefully she isn't presented with the choice to act on her denial until she matures a bit more.

A feminist woman.

Empty. Bereft. NPC.

Most modern young women. And most of the ones that wouldn’t are too cowardly to condemn it.

All the selfish people in the world.

100's of thousands of morally bankrupt woman a year.

She just wants to be liked

Me two! 😂lol.

Sounds like she already got rid of a few.

​​@@kgar5String it's very possible. May be why she won't concede she is scared to think she has murdered her own child/children. Very sad

I hope she has none

​This is highly likely. She just gas light herself into thinking she did no wrong.

...young? She looks like 45

​@@HaoPieldeosolol. Gen-Z is aging like milk.

And full of c**

Well, sleepy Joe is going to forgive her student debt soon.🤣

@@salguodrolyat2594 as I said to an ex who was convinced that their would be “forgiven” Wish with one hand and shit in the other, see what one fills up first

@@focusedonfuture3255 🤣👏

God is the one who decides when life begins, people should decide how the baby gets there and stop that process before it happens.

@@kgar5String Huh?

@@lesterven1847 He's arguing for control by the church.

Would you consider the morning after pill murder?

@@dream6562 The morning after pill kills a person with seperate and unique DNA. So yes, that is murder.

@@dream6562 Purely on a moralistic argument (so, separate from any legal precedent), my thought is you're facilitating the circumstances to minimize the chance of the fetus' survival. In essence, the comparison in my mind (were we speaking of an infant) would be finding the child left outside somewhere with just a wool sheet to keep it warm...and removing the sheet. You're not snuffing the life out, no, but you're demonstrating intent to prevent survival.

​@@dream6562If the zygot has been conceived, then yes. Your actions are deliberately stopping the unique life continuing to gestate.

@@vajoynus idk personal level, I'm ok with it unless it's past 1st trimester

She's so awful; she agreed with being ignorant on all the definitions that mattered and still wanted to die on the hill. She's a solipsist. People like her are beyond immature.

More like Taylor Slow.

@@DestroyerOfWombs Nice one!😆

HAHAH

@@DestroyerOfWombs ayooooo, ALSO THAT NAME HOLY.

Agreed

Absolutely

Borderline? She is.

Just evil. Not borderline. Her saying it nicely and couched in PC terms doesn't change the evil.

Or how the baby got there

This is just a joke, people like her state the case for an abortion.

Great point! If the “pro abortion logic” isn’t backed by religion OR science, then what is it backed by? Selfish peoples opinions?

An embryo only maintains homeostasis from its mother, it consumes nutrients through the the umbilical cord that the mother gives. If the embyo is removed it is not a viable any longer. Living things grow, mantain homeostasis on their own, and reproduce. Embryos cannot do that on their own.

Yup , its real life lmfao

Adam’s sin wasn’t any better. He also tried blaming the woman AND God after he willfully disobeyed despite Adam being the one having received the direct order to not eat from the tree so he knew better. That’s the difference. Yet sin is sin. All disobedience is a sin

“It’s better to live alone in the desert than with a quarrelsome, complaining wife.” ‭‭Proverbs‬ ‭21‬:‭19‬ ‭NLT‬‬

​@@shayalynntouched female emotions there lmao

@@shayalynn Your reply is typical of the modern women. You have problem with this verse take it up with God. Yes you are correct that Adam and most men cower down to women just to keep the peace. The real problem is that women are very liberal and unsubmissive look at all the women of today who have tattoos abortions and act more like men than women. It took me years to get married because I couldn’t find a woman who would follow me as a man because most women want to be the man. Until women except their role as the weaker vessel and submit to the men, we are going to continue to have unmarried women growing old and all alone with cats versus children and a happy marriage. Find a Godly man and follow his lead and you will have a blessed life.

She’d give the same answer, or change it and say, “well I wouldn’t do it but it is (insert leftist my body my choice garbage).

Can't you post any news article where woman get a 9 month abortion?

She will have that abortion at nine months easily and not lose any sleep over it. But a year later, she will definitely blame the father for it.🤣

​@@javierarce86the Montreal Gazette and the Denver Times both have articles about women having abortions at 32 weeks and 35 weeks. Google it.

​@@javierarce86yt strikes again. The Montreal Gazette and the Denver Times both have articles of women going through with it at 32 weeks and 35 weeks.

It would be "distasteful" to kill a baby 1 day before birth but not murder. so stupid.

Yeah we draw the line at conception lol

All women have this twisted logic.

This guy slays and cooks big time. Indeed. A heavy weight champion. Beacon of rationality. So eye opening how far he can go.

No. She's smart. What she is, is an evil monster.