No video

Antenna test: Stock V-85 High Gain VS Nagoya NA-771 (fake and real) vs UT-72G - Part 1 SWR test

  Рет қаралды 5,776

Toys n Tools

Toys n Tools

2 жыл бұрын

In part 1 we are doing SWR test of real and fake Nagoya antenna and comparing to stock rubber ducky V-85 to determine is it worth upgrading.
In part 2 we would do range test.

Пікірлер: 19
@HardcoreFourSix
@HardcoreFourSix 2 жыл бұрын
The "G" designator means that they are tuned for GMRS band (462-467MHZ)
@adlucem9845
@adlucem9845 2 жыл бұрын
Magnetic antennas have their ground attached to the magnet. They have to be tested on a metal surface.
@garyburns1033
@garyburns1033 5 күн бұрын
You need a metal pan like a pizza pan and stick the antenna magnet mount in the center with at least a inch of metal or more around the base. Then you can use it as if it was on the ground.
@terryshrives8322
@terryshrives8322 Жыл бұрын
Its nice to see someone actually know how to use that meter. I can’t tell you how many people don’t put their hand around it when taking a reading
@kord2003
@kord2003 Жыл бұрын
When wrap my hand around it it starts showing much smaller values depending on how tightly I hold it. If I squeeze it tight it shows SWR=1.01 even for the crappiest knockoff antenna. Honestly, I'm not sure if that's the correct way to test SWR with this meter.
@SecretMan299
@SecretMan299 5 ай бұрын
Good day, I'm planning to purchase either the Nagoya UT-72 or Nagoya UT-72G antenna. I'm primarily going to use frequencies between 451.000 to 455.000 most of the time, and occasionally frequencies between 144 to 145. I've heard that the Nagoya UT-72G might be a better choice since its frequency range extends from 155 to 462 compared to the Nagoya UT-72, which covers 144 to 430. However, I've noticed that the Nagoya UT-72G is more expensive in my area. Can you please provide guidance on which antenna would be the better option given my frequency usage and budget constraints? Your assistance is much appreciated. Thank you.
@craigspada1676
@craigspada1676 7 ай бұрын
Great info and video, very informative. Thanks 73's WA2TWF
@rilosvideos877
@rilosvideos877 7 ай бұрын
You got the '1.01' reading quite often when testing - that brings me to the conclusion there's something weird in your test setup! From the comments i read that this is due to the usage of the SWR-meter you use, and i think so too. When you grab it thightly with your hand you will nearly always get such readings. For the fake Nagoyas i saw very different results when testing. I think the quality spreads from 1:1.5 to 1:6 or similar depending on what you actually got. They don't do manual matching/tuning. At the base of the real ones you will find little inductor coils and caps as matching network for low SWR.
@optusphone3966
@optusphone3966 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you very much for comparison test.
@terryshrives8322
@terryshrives8322 Жыл бұрын
I had about the same results
@Knarf14
@Knarf14 Жыл бұрын
Can you try this test with your hand off the meter
@mavz5707
@mavz5707 Жыл бұрын
Instructions on this meter for swr said with the hand on, for power test without hand😉
@wyckedknight
@wyckedknight 2 ай бұрын
Never ever place your hand and fingers on the connectors, it will not provide accurate testing.
@jfrphoto01
@jfrphoto01 Жыл бұрын
Useless comparison and tests! Mag mount antennas must be on a metal surface (car body) to test SWR and the 771G is a dedicated GMRS antenna and not intended for use on VHF except for receive! I have several of the "fake" Nagoya 771's and, when tested with a proper counterpoise on a properly calibrated NANO VNA SAA-2, they were all well within specs on both the amateur VHF (144 MHz) and UHF (430 MHz).
@alienwarex51i3
@alienwarex51i3 Жыл бұрын
Yeah but who tf wants to use a counterpoise
@damiengirvan5020
@damiengirvan5020 Жыл бұрын
Really?? I think I just bought about five of these fake antennas.... How do you then explain the difference in swr between the real and the fake he is demonstrating in this video??
@alienwarex51i3
@alienwarex51i3 Жыл бұрын
​@@damiengirvan5020 My authentic Nagoya 771 has 1.01 SWR on 440 MHz and about 1.5 SWR on 145 MHz. From this video (and other tests I've seen) it seems like the fake ones are a roll of the dice on whether they're OK or not. Some of them have 3+ SWR on one of the bands, others are alright. He's right though, the UT-72G antenna this guy is testing is specifically for GMRS frequencies.
@damiengirvan5020
@damiengirvan5020 Жыл бұрын
I think I just bought about five of these fake antennas.....
@deadave100
@deadave100 Жыл бұрын
Me...3
Fake Nagoya Antennas - TheSmokinApe
10:03
TheSmokinApe
Рет қаралды 62 М.
FAKE Nagoya NA-771 testing SWR on 70cm - Nano VNA.  SHOCKING RESULT !
15:17
路飞太过分了,自己游泳。#海贼王#路飞
00:28
路飞与唐舞桐
Рет қаралды 43 МЛН
Box jumping challenge, who stepped on the trap? #FunnyFamily #PartyGames
00:31
Family Games Media
Рет қаралды 29 МЛН
Антенны Nagoya NA-771. Подделка против оригинала
16:19
Nagoya NA771 Retevis RHD-771 Подделки или китайское качество? Разборка антенн.
7:40
Радиоканал с Алексеем Игониным
Рет қаралды 61 М.
Nagoya NA-771 Fake vs Original Antenna Comparison Test
3:44
Electronics&Computers
Рет қаралды 67 М.
Doubled our performance with a new antenna.
15:09
Paul Ethier
Рет қаралды 14 М.
ABBREE Tactical Antennas
19:19
Gadget Talk
Рет қаралды 21 М.
Nagoya UT-72 dual-band mobile antenna SWR test
6:52
Soladaddy
Рет қаралды 16 М.
Fake Ebay £3 Nagoya NA-771.  What is inside
5:04
Fred in the Shed
Рет қаралды 33 М.