my grandfather was a Abkhazian Ottoman Consprict during gallipoli war,he was from blacksea region so when he tried to go the gallipoli fought against brits war already was over.

Unfortunately in Australia we just don’t have as much of a sense of respect as you would hope I mean most people these days just see Anzac Day as a day to get pissed and I noticed at the last Anzac Day about a third of people showed up to the dawn service in pjs the rest were in jeans and a T-shirt and very few were in anything formal and or respectful

@tesko radic they fought for the elites, to secure "their kingdoms " by the deaths of common people ,turks and anzacs alike. unfortunatly the west continues to be led by the warmonger elite, they die while elites eat cake .

Control ALL the ports, control the people, the penal colonies , control the prices on trade, take a big profit on trade, control the people. Control who is allowed to sell to who, control the people. Why are we buying a product of India, which is repackaged in Britain, rather than buy directly from India?

No they didn't..

But you should repected the dead anyway no matter what.. Even if they're morrons for following clearly insane orders and getting involved in another pointless war.

Indeed, Terry. The Aussies and Kiwis are among the very best in the world on many levels.

Iyi bok yediniz. Bide marifet gibi anlatiyo hıyar....yok şu kadar asker gönderdik, yok fransa da varmış, yok hint lide oradaymış. 8 ülke olarak geldiniz ama TÜRK'ün tokadını yiyip evinize döndünüz, ya da dònemediniz...

Turkey was knocked out of the war in 1918.

Where did you get that nonsense from? Australians halted the japanese in Papua New Guinea - Milne Bay, multiple victories along the Kokoda track, Buna, Gona, Sanananda - all the first victories over the elite marine landing forces of the japanese army/navy - in brutal conditions that made pretty much anything else look like a picnic. THats not even mentioning the naval contribution. The real point is that Macarthur was incensed by Australian victories that made his army forces look bad - and that was bad for him because he was in competition with the navy and marines and was angling for the presidency. So he downplayed the Australian victories and their importance - describing them as "mopping up operations", when they definitely were not: the were decisive strategic victories. Interesting that you use the same language. But macarthur then banished the australians to places where they wouldnt make macarthur's armies look bad. Ironically, the Australians then fought an almost insurgent war against the japanese in Indonesia and the Phillipines, becoming in the process, the best jungle fighters in the world. And, no, there were not strikes and go slows. That happened before the war with japan started.

@@tileux There were strikes and go slows in Australia in WW2. Dockers bludging week days to get triple pay on w/ends, refusing to offload vital war materiel when it was raining,and argued for excessive pay rates. The Americans were so inscenced they brought in navy personnel to offload at w/Ends. Miners struck incessantly and the other Nations were wondering if Australia was losing interest in the war. The Australian army was reduced by 22% as being too bloated in mid war. Read NEMESIS by Max Hastings its all in there. The chapter is called, Australia, Bludging and mopping up.

@@anthonyeaton5153 That is a lie. Youre getting your information from sources that rely on the writing of a far right wing guy called Hal Colebatch, who published this nonsense in the right wing journal Quadrant (now defunct, I think). It has been soundly debunked multiple times. But the fascists like to rely on it and you clearly have a bit of a barrow to push so youre quite willing to push a baseless and false narrative.

@@anthonyeaton5153 Not sure where my response to you has gone, but, again, your comment is false. YOure relying on long debunked right wing nonsense. Not surprising because youre name along almost screams at me that youre a former private school boy from the right, whose heads are full of lies like that.

Aust. inflicted severe casualties on the enemy in New Guinea.

This about the ANZAC'S in WW1 not WW2, you dickhead.

This is World War 1. Are you lost perchance?

@@charlottemercieca4739Please tell me why is the commentator speaking about WW2.

NZ Air Squadrons flying in Normandy, they fought for two years in Italy and the 3rd NZ Division was capturing islands in the pacific

@@jammyscouser2583I was talking about Australians. Yes kiwis were in Bomber Command and Fighter Command etc as were the Aussies. On the ground in Normandy etc was my central point.

It is causalities. Causality in war is different from total death count. It includes wounded too. Official numbers around 77.000 deaths, 11.000 missing, 97.000 wounded, 64.000 sick, total sums up around 250.000 causalities.

It was 250 thousand. Go look at their memorials instead of wrongly writing anything about that precious place and the heroes dead or alive who fought against each other because of a half mad man who e as called a genius

@@filizaltman5058 56k Turks were killed by enemies, others died by diseases, etc