Except for the first 5 minutes 😅

There were a lot of unknowns with Apollo 11 that they went into blind. So much was learned because of that 12-17 had it easy. Armstrong and Aldrin were absolutely the right guys for that mission. But yeah these guys were talking like they were out for a stroll. Each team has it's own dynamic.

@@Midlanflyguy I read that Edgar Mitchel - pilot of 14 actually got into trouble from NASA. Apparently he decided to do some barn storming in the LEM before putting her down. There was only ever one other man considered to fly the LEM on 11, Gus Grissom who died in the fire on Apollo 1

@@Midlanflyguy I wouldn't call landing on the moon 'easy'.

It was not at all 'seconds from failure'. Armstrong was flying the LM and he picked out a landing site. He was under pressure but Armstrong suited his name

Thank you Mr T !

😂 I pity you for not asking why we can go there in 2023. With all the technology out now.

@@jaysage976 Who will pay for it??? That's why

And than, the mentor said to the student "just keep talking"

Coaching, The LMP and the CMP are a team during LM landing. That is one VERY busy cockpit, requiring both pilots to pay attention to a lot of data coming in and their environment. Al was handling consumables, power, communications, and navigation, Pete was piloting.

“Sugar calls.” That’s what naval aviators do for each other when trying to get their aircraft back aboard the boat. They just took the same concept into space.

After all, they were both fully invested in the outcome.

@@Nighthawke70 I love Alan Bean here, a very reassuring presence, 'OUTSTANDING PETE' and then more serious, 'Need to come on down Pete - slow the descent rate.'

Yeah, because it was fake.

@@MediaBrainwashDOTcom I suppose you can't even add. How can you comprehend brilliance and intelligence? Keep rotting away watching reality tv and "duh, space is fake".

@@srinitaaigaura It's a ;pt easier to fool someone than to convince them they've been fooled. ... and fooled you have been. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/h7d7p7lqyb6Zdnk.html

They made it within 300 feet of their Surveyor target. NASA had scienced the hell out of the Apollo 11 landing and 12 benefited from it.

@@srinitaaigaura But you do. And that's how YOU went on the moon.

and there is alwasy the possibility that these conversations were in the multi million dollar simulation that was built used for astronauts to practice in - hecnce the casual chatter. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bLulhaao2K3Zl5s.html

Dave, you're delusional.

Yes Maxie. This was the "everyman" landing. How we'd be in such a situation. I understand why the first landing was so "by the numbers". But I think with this one they let their humanity show. Beautiful!

Did you cry when Sandra Bullock got in trouble when she was on space mission also?

@@DaveHammondDublin Go away hammond. Go find some conspiracy idiots to talk to. You're in the wrong comments section. I don't just dislike you posting your dreary, stay at home, crap here. The strongest emotion I have is pity. I feel sad for you that you can't be proud of what our species is doing. I know it will get worse. Those of us who've read enough Sc-Fi know that the faction you represent will grow, become more vocal about how we should stay on Earth & turn it into some kind of garden to save the whales. Your little group will even get violent later. With luddites damaging space hardware. We know what's coming. You'll all still be shouting, typing & making "space debunked" videos in your mum's basements when the first baby is born on the Moon, on Mars or the O'Neill cylinder at Lagrange 1. I pity you, you sad little man. Along with all of your type. Furiously looking down as hard as you can. Look up little man! Look up! For *THERE* is where the future of your species lies.

+EnDSchultz1 Thank you for your comment. I'd make a further observation about the differences between the Apollo 11 and Apollo 12 crews. I think it was entirely a fluke that it was the quiet, reserved, serious crew that happened to make the first landing. Leading up to the landing attempts, there was every chance that Conrad and Bean might have had the first crack at it. I don't think it mattered to NASA whether the first crew were serious or jovial in their crew dynamic. Both crews were absolutely 'no-nonsense'.

Apollo 12 - Apollo Flight Journal Interesting! I didn't know it was basically a toss-up. Also, I didn't mean to suggest the crew of Apollo 12 were in any way unprofessional, just that their demeanor was unusually energetic (and refreshingly so) for such a serious and tense undertaking. In any case, the way it actually turned out is probably for the best. Imagine if the first words spoken from the surface of the moon were, "Well golly-gee, I can't believe we actually made it, Al!" ...Yeah, definitely turned out for the best!

+EnDSchultz1 Each step towards the landing (Apollo 9 testing in earth orbit, Apollo 10 rehearsing in lunar orbit) had to be successfully carried out before moving onto the next step. If one of those missions had uncovered serious problems that needed to be addressed, their mission would have been repeated by the succeeding crew. Therefore, when the Apollo 11 crew was announced in January 1969, there was every reason to expect that they might not get to make the first landing attempt, though they were to train for that possibility. I agree that it turned out good. Neil Armstrong was an exemplary figure to have commanded Apollo 11. However, I also think that Pete's and Al's approach to their task was tempered by the knowledge that the important first landing had already been completed. Conrad was well aware that theirs was second, as revealed by his approach to his words when stepping onto the surface. ("Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me.") He had made a bet with an Italian journalist when she insisted that NASA would script his speech. He told her that wasn't the case and said would make a wise crack - and he did. I expect his approach would have been very different had he been the First Man.

+EnDSchultz1 They all were cowboys, but on area 51.

+EnDSchultz1 haha :-)

Very well said.

All of the 7 are dead now. I don't like that. I don't like that at all. Yeah, I know it's an autistic thing, but I just wish everything in the would stop fucking _changing_ right out from under me.

@@jessfucket That is a tragedy and a relief at the same time. Everything changes.

@@guntherachterhof4876 so true, and the reason we survive, thrive and continue to proliferate is because we are adaptable.

There are nicer videos about landing these days

Alan Bean Has gone west last May 2018. RIP Alan Bean. Professor Bean loved to paint the moon and the Lunar encounters in watercolors. But he wanted to be so accurate for what he was painting he would call his fellow astronaut friends about the texture, the slight gradations in color, and the feeling of the moment. Bean would consult with his fellow astronauts and get their advice before he would complete his paintings. What an artist. It has been said in many science books that mathematicians and musicians have similar brain structures. I personally believe that this is also true with artists and musically minded people who also excel in science. Somehow, the right and left parts of the brain communicate for this special purpose of art for scientific accuracy about things. JMHO.

He had the right stuff for sure.

it was incredible...i am no pilot - but i do wonder at the the wisdom of only having 100 sec of fuel left after the lessons that should have been learned on apollo 11...Nasa had spent millions of dollars on building simulations for practice for years ahead of this ....i happen to think for such a life or death critical part of the whole program that the execution of this while seemingly amazing and maverick -is kinda not very 'professional' in its demeanor - they are almost talking as if it is a simulation ...the lack of delay in many of the conversations is also a little curios. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/bLulhaao2K3Zl5s.html

@@DaveHammondDublin Rocket equation. Adding loads of fuel means adding weight means you have to add 100 times as much weight in fuel to earlier stages. Having just as much as needed with as minimal as much extra IS what made them pros. As for delays, they are there were they should be, not where they shouldn't.

@@DaveHammondDublin I recognize what you say and i also wonder how nasa flight control and leadership thinks about this. I trust the astronaut's opinion and expertise here so i am not going to judge them. I loved their enthousiasm.

@@DaveHammondDublin The delay is not present because the recordings are recorder from Mission Controle. So you hear only the delay when the astronaut have to reply. When the astronauts have replied CAPCOM responds immediately because you are hearing it from Mission Control's side.

@sirini... Especially in VACUUM ... 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Friendlier than JIM LOVELL!?

Agreed, 12 was one of the best. Too bad we couldn’t see the moonwalk at home because they burnt out the camera by pointing it at the sun.😢

moon* but yeah

@@EzraMerr hey, it was on purpose, it used to be a part of the earth, so double planet is better

Indeed ...the snow man ... magic .... 👉👌

​@@bennyandersen742the Mars-sized planet Theia impacted with the Earth and that impact created the moon with part Earth and part Theia.

The AGC held direction cosines etc.

That's because it's fake silly head.

They were wearing masks though and they were vaccinated. Amazing

@arenalife Have you seen the snow man ??😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Camop 1992 yes, and they were aware of the danger to the camera in advance and still did it. It can happen to the best of them.

...well...

Kind of like aiming the spacecraft into gimbal lock.

And I thought gopros are tough cameras.

I'm not sure of 11's authenticity. Bean didn't even know about the van allen belts and the risk that they posed. And I think the camera 'malfunction' was intentional.

"Yeah." Lol. What a chad

Willoughby Krenzteinburg 😂🤣 yeah that was real detailed

@@germavery2223 It was. For instance at 3 mins plus you can hear then putting the value into the guidance computer www.geek.com/news/how-the-apollo-11s-1-024mhz-guidance-computer-did-a-lot-with-very-little-1562831/ He takes a relatively long time to put the 4 and 2 in there to hit the buttons right but then 0 and repeat 0 is faster, as it would be if being done in a high pressure situation. If this was recorded in a film studio this little detail would have been missed and the reading backwards of the numbers would be at the same rate. You can tell he is making double sure on each press but does not have to make as sure on pressing the 0 button twice so he feels happier hitting it quicker. Which is what you would do if you were above the moon. Deny that..... You can tell after Apollo11, and nearly running out of fuel, this concerned Bean do he keeps saying loads of fuel, so Collins then gets using that fuel fort a perfect landing and Bean then swaps from talking about all that fuel to please get down soon to Conrad :)

The people who deny these things usually are invulnerable to facts. Even when presented, they will keep denying.

IT WAS A HOAX YOU MORON, SPACE IS A DISNEY ENTERPRISE, THEY'RE SELLING THE INTANGIBLE, ITS THE PERFECT BUSINESS MODEL. ALSO HAVE YOU SEEN PLUTO ? IT ACTUALLY HAS MICKEYS DOG ON IT YOU MORON. GET REAL.

@@Fastbikkel and people of that opinion are so indoctrinated & lost they don't know which way is up, adrift in a sea of lies.

Thanks for this Joe

@tampicokid I'm so sorry if this is at too high an intellectual level for you.

Nice editing job there, Joe. After 2 years! Wow. Happy new year. (-;

@@ronalddump4061 I noticed a word was spelled wrong or something.

Was the Surveyor visible in this video? I did try to look for it but the field of view is so limited that it could easily have been outside it.

The trench run is for pussies compared to this. :-)

Hollywood baby.

FAKE!

Justa bunch of liars.

...cargo of ball bearings for gravity experiments no doubt.

Yes "babe" 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@Don Eagan Did those broke your teeth ?

Hollywood baby.

Maybe smoothest, but Neil Armstrong waited a little too long after Buzz said "Contact Light" and touched down so softly that the landing struts didn't fully collapse. Neil even mentioned it while he was on the ladder that the struts were not fully compressed. That's why it was not such a "small step" from the bottom rung to the footpad of the LM.

@@daffidavit The ladder does appear to be about half foot higher in 11 (first pic) compared to 12 (second pic) upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/d1/Apollo-11_nasa_535.jpg d7hftxdivxxvm.cloudfront.net/?resize_to=width&src=https%3A%2F%2Fartsy-media-uploads.s3.amazonaws.com%2FQTTOoZfalhbPHiB1HTYPMg%252FApollo_12_Al_Bean_stepping_on_moon.jpg&width=1200&quality=80

Amen. I was a little young to witness, but can always say I was born the same year as the Apollo 10, 11, and 12. All of those men were and are heroes. Such an amazing time. Can't wait till man get back out there.

SS Sandman You made the same "error" Neil Armstrong was accused of making an error when he made his famous "one small step" statement. I've read books on what Neil Armstrong said he thought he was saying. Back in the day (the late 1960s) everybody in the U.S.A. had a slang lingo which I suspect many of us have inherited today. When Neil Armstrong said: "That's one small step for (fora) man and one giant leap for mankind", either he forgot his proper words (which I believe most of us would have at the time and still would have) or his message was "clipped" by the automatic voice-activated microphones at the time. I personally do not believe his sentence was "clipped" by the voice-activated microphone. I say this because of the way we spoke back in the day. We never would have intentionally pronounced: "That's one small step for (A) man etc. What we would have said is: That's one small step for man (meaning a man but not thinking about the proper singular usage of the word). Special experts went so far back so as to learn how people in Neil Armstrong's neighborhood spoke in the day. Some of the experts agree that the words: for a, would have been combined for words sounding similar to "fora". But if an everyday person used the term "fora" in lieu of "for a" the response when being combined with a voice-activated intercom would have sounded like: "That's one small step fora man and one giant leap for mankind". However, even I, with my born and bred New Jersey accent would have said the same thing. i.e. " that's one small step fora man, one giant leap for mankind". But when pronouncing the combined two words, for a, into fora, into a voice-activated intercom, it most likely would have sounded like: That's one small step for (a silent) man, one giant leap for mankind. Also, back in the day, and even today, the term "a man" and "man" are coincidental. In other words, when said, they mean the same thing. I know there are reams of experts who have discussed this issue. I have not indulged them, but I personally believe that Neil Armstrong did not say "a man" but said, "fora man" and the "a " was either said too quickly and sounded like "man" or it was cut off during the transmission, or it was combined into "fora" sounding like "for" man. It was one or the other. I personally believe Neil spoke the way we all did back in the day. We would have said: "That's one small step for (a) man. But the "a" would have been cut off naturally because of the way we spoke back in the day. JMHO.

@@daffidavitYes I have read the same thing before. Who wouldn't have stumbled over a few words being the first man to step on the moon? I would be more like Young and Duke on 16. LoL. Though, you still puzzled, where did I make the same mistake? If I did, it was probably from typing into my phone while walking into our out of work.

SS Sandman I went back to see where I thought you made a "mistake". I have to take it back. I can not recall now why I thought you did. Sorry. I am glad you understand that there are others who have investigated this issue and who have come to the conclusion that Armstrong may have said the word "fora" so quickly that it sounded like "for" or either he just got caught up in the moment of speaking while 3 billion (?) people were listening to him. But thank you for your kind response anyway.

@@daffidavit No worries. So cool having all of these videos available at our fingertips to watch over some of the most amazing feats made by mankind. Still baffled at all the people that still think it was all faked. What a shame. Your statement made me curious about the population then. It was around 3.75 billion people then. Crazy that the population has doubled since then. Unreal. Any way have a good one!

Yeah that was one hellva crew in Apollo 12. There's another video on KZfaq showing the lightning strikes. After the emergency's sorted, Houston asks how the ship's doing, and Pete Conrad responds in not quite NASA approved language... "She's chugging along quite nicely"! :O)

Yeah that pitchover would have made me shit my pants, that was wild. But im sure they knew this beforehand.

I have seen better.

@@Fastbikkel Go get clean pants, man. You stink.

@@Warriorking.1963 When Pete was reporting the problem, he said "We've had everything in the world drop out". I guess he wasn't one for test-pilot stoicism.

Seen WAY better. In 4K too.

If you believe this crap, you are not an engineer. Go away !

actually he said “Whoopie! Man, that may have been a small one for Neil, but that's a long one for me” but you still get the meaning so - yeah lol

Brent Gasson I can’t understand how people say this didn’t happen

Brent Gasson y

This audio is identical to the audio broadcast during the CBS coverage of the landing back in 69 although sometimes it is hard to hear with Wally Schirra and Walter Cronkite talking over it

A little research goes a long way..Enjoy .Apollo 15 in 60fps: Rover Traverse To Station 4 kzfaq.info/get/bejne/mNV2jZaUpt3XYmQ.html

👈👈😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Matt Collier In case you haven't seen them, I'm delighted to let you know that the landing videos for Apollos 14, 15 and 16 are online. Apollo 14: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pcCKmJCpvd6dj6M.html Apollo 15: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/d96hfs912M2xqpc.html Apollo 16: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gLmIm8Vkr5aZoKc.html

Apollo 12 - Apollo Flight Journal Oh man this is so awesome. Thank you thank you!

I'd love it if someone would make a simulation of that.

@Thomas Pickering "Wanna see me do it again?" was in reference to Apollo 12 being the second manned moon landing. That said, NASA's funding was cut to less than 2% of the Federal budget shortly before the end of Apollo, and has remained at that level ever since. Money gets things done, and without increased funding, there's no way NASA could match the progress of the Apollo era.

It’d probably feel a little unsteady because of the lower gravity. I imagine it’d be a little like wading in the shallow end of a pool, but without the drag of the water.

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Really ??? Don Pettit told us already !😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

@Thomas Pickering here we go another flat earther it a big shame for human history that we have FLAT EARTHERS IN this time

@Thomas Pickering i have a telescope i see ISS by my telescope( i see solar panels and radiators) you can serch on internet and see what ISS look like in telescope so nasa did not lie about ISS why they should lie about apollo?!

@Thomas Pickering oh man sorry. why you are so sad.?

They'd done it hundreds of times in the simulator incorporating data gained from 11.

Yes.... always liked him. Amy Bean is on Facebook and she will talk to people sometimes !!! Very nice.

OUTSTANDING.

Watch 'a funny thing happened on the way to the moon' and you might change your mind about him.

Definitely the best crew.

It wasn't exactly like that, Bean was portrayed as a little bit more green than he was, but... I kind of choose to believe that's the real version, the actors playing Pete and Al (and Dick) were absolutely perfectly cast

The reference to tapemeter is not humour. The instrument they used to display their altitude was a tapemeter. This was a display where a length of tape with altitudes marked on it was moved past a stationary pointer. The advantage of a tape meter was that the tape could be quite long and its resolution could be altered partway through the tape. At one end, the major divisions were 1,000 feet, then around 7,000 feet, this jumped to 100 feet. Somewhere around 700 feet, the major divisions of the tapemeter changed to 10 feet. More here: www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/alsj-Tapemeters.html

@@apollo12-apolloflightjourn11 Oh, thanks for that info! That is very interesting. And it makes sense.

It's a good point, but they were not told about that.

Indeed. Made 12 such an anticlimax after 11.

The flappers were perfectly controlled. Also they turned off their electronic devices.

CO2 pp is sadly higher down here...

Yeah awesome landing

I think so, also. I think since they lost the TV camera..................... it is kind of a forgotten MOON LANDING !!!! :)

@@spsanders69 not just the landing, but the takeoff...when lightning struck his ship seconda after launch, every red light & alarm on the panel went ape 💩...but Conrad assessed the situation & didn't abort..even correctly guessing what had happened.

@@spsanders69 Have you seen the snow man yet ???? if not get more meds.

@@dks13827 Kubrick took care of that !

Pete did get another spaceflight after that though, one of the Skylab ones where he got to do a lot of work with the solar telescope, so I guess they weren't too upset with him. Contrast that with the fate of the Apollo 7 crew (who "mutinied" against ground control), or Rusty Schweickart (who had an attack of space-sickness during Apollo 9, before it was realised to be a fairly common condition), none of whom ever flew in space again

I was interested in this touchdown cursing, so I looked it up: "And, whoever said 'lunar contact light', I went 'bamm' and shut it down. (Laugh) Somewhere in there, I think there's an 'Oh shit'. Or there almost was. But about that time we were on (the Moon), and I didn't have to get it (the 'oh shit') the rest of the way out. I remember that." - Conrad It might've never happened. But Bean contends: "Probably didn't get the VOX (triggered)." So you might be right about it just not being picked up. From www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/a12/a12.landing.html

No, it's real because it neither could nor can be faked. Literally.

Why did you put man and planet in quotes? He was a man and the moon is not a planet. Idiots everywhere...

Nah ... Don Pettit IS the man. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Mr. Bean is awesome 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

I call them trumptards.

Grow up. You two and too many others on here are acting fools yourselves.