Same with my Grandfather bless his soul, he was an engineer and was so impressed by the moon landing, He used to tell me stories about seeing the first television in his neighbourhood and how they all went to their friends house down the road to watch the moon landing,, I'm, never forget his last words he told me "Stop shaking the ladder you little Shi..."

was she born in the 1800s? something like 1891

My grandma had a drinking problem too 😞

@@Valkron11 that’s why she worked at a brothel?

even tho she didnt see man landing on the moon.People are so dumb that they think proof of landing on the moon was shown on live tv.its easier to fool someone than convince them they have been fooled.

Agreed 👍

do you think russia would have done the same had they won the race?

@@sandwichman100 the Cosmonauts MIGHT have....

@@sandwichman100 definitely not, russians hate everyone, including themselves

​@@sandwichman100absolutely. Russians today or then aren't nearly as bigoted aS Americans are now.

Do you still believe in Santa too?

Me too! I was 9 years old in 1969. Still have vivid memories of the moon landing. It was really mind boggling.

I hope not literally

Same age and TV here.

Unbelievable some people still believe we landed on the moon when we just crashed a lander on the lunar surface the other day! No human has ever ventured past low earth orbit because there is no way of dealing with space's radiation ie: van Allen belts or with the threat of a sudden solar storm/flare. It was a nice show Apollo, but is was all make-believe. Get a grip.

They died for a movie

Huh? Whatever you’re talking about, it’s pretty obscure. Explain.

@@johnspooner1403 it's pretty much self explanatory

@@nyeaglesfootballgarbagemen8346 - Nope. No it isn’t. It’s obtuse.

@@johnspooner1403 Oh right, you're frim Soviet Canuckistan Your country is pretty slow

It is hard to compete for Fake Space that Don't exist 😂

WTF are you talking about, 1 russian died because of to pure oxygen did the Russians tell Americans NO that's why NASA lost 3 in fire inside capsule. No importaint life saving information was ever past between them. They were in a SPACE RACE ever heard that saying, the pilots might of had respect for each other but NASA was in a major competition with Russians they beat Americans in everything but the landing on the moon, why do you think so many Americans don't believe they landed on the moon when they claimed. First satellite in space: Russians First animal in space: dog Russians First man in space: Russians First man to return from space: Russians First space walk: Russians First women in space: Russians First lost woman in space: Russians First object on the moon: Russians First man on moon: Americans????? So why did I put question marks? Simple reely America couldn't get any rockets of the pad with out them blowing up, don't get me wrong Russia had many issues at the start too. America couldn't get any Apollo rockets off the ground without them blowing up, then all of a sudden they are working perfectly and they are sending men to the moon in only short months later, OK maybe it was a glitch a easy fix but as so many have pointed out it seems very strange that the hardest task was done by America after so many issues and it went perfectly, well not really see NASA lost tapes on returning to earth these tapes were damaged when travelling through the radiation belt, also by radiation on the moon basically ruining the footage so they fixed it, but how they never went back to the moon at that point in time so how do you recover film on the moon. They FAKED IT, oh I'm not talking about the moon landing, they got a movie set and retook the photos they had lost as well as some film they'd lost. Now back when this happened you probably get shot for telling this, but it came out in the mid 80s, the smart people started to question and think well if they faked it to reposes the picture and film why couldn't they of faked the whole lot. Because of people coming up with that conclusion NASA went quiet again and its extremely hard to find evidence of what they did, hard but not impossible just need to know were to look. But as far as friendship between NASA and Russian's in space race, it never happened until 1980s when they built the space station

Unfortunately the Russian space programme is part of the military, unlike the US...

Well done Amigo👍🦅

@JamieWex Okay, THAT is 100% a load of BS. The reason “most people don’t know” is because it doesn’t exist. The only thing the Russians care about is how much $$ they can extort from our mutual (NASA, ESA, etc.) Programs., and please, spare me the “It’s the Government” speech, because it isn’t. The bastards not only doubled their Taxi Fare rate to the ISS after President Odumbass canned the Shuttle Program w/o first having a viable replacement vehicle, they were also several years behind schedule in delivering their ISS modules. All the Russians have ever “done” for us is cost us more money, headaches, and more problems. About the only thing the Russians have done right is NOT killing any of our Astronauts; yes, we’ve lost our share, but not in the horrific ways they have because of their stupidity. Even some of our Astronauts have passed on an ISS mission because they’d have to take a Russian vehicle both ways. “Competitive”?? I Don’t THINK SO. “Respect”? 100% Pure Propaganda. Why? Because we still need public support, but that’s as far as it goes.

sounds very possible!

Later Apollo missions did plant the flag farther away to avoid what happened on Apollo 11. Great theory about the dust! I never thought about that!

How many pairs of spacesuit boot overlays still remain on the lunar surface

When the lunar capsule left the moon, it was on top of another rocket which stayed. It had the fuel for landing. So if the capsule took off, the exaust wouldn't have kicked up dust because the exaust would have hit the capsule that got left on the moon. Now about it being knocked over by the re-directed exaust I can't say because I don't know exactly how far away it was from the take off platform. But I assume that because there is less gravity and no atmosphere to speak of on the moon than there would be less resistance to slow down the exaust from the capsule.

Like your theory.

5 now as they located the 2 Russian rovers with Fench built retroreflectors.

@@DeputyNordburg Six now (as of a few months ago on Chandrayaan-3). Or, even more if you include the ones that crashed and shattered into a million pieces.

Great 👍

was it possible to see the return red ? laser light with physical viewing through the telescope ? You hint yes but don't say so.

The monitors were black and white. (1981)

I checked you out as well..your videos are pretty amazing

I can not agree.

@@salsa83 I agree with you not agreeing

@@David-kw6xp Thanks!..Hope you enjoyed

Why did you put (youtuber) in your channel name? Wouldn't that make it less professional?

USA here, thanks for sharing that story ❤

@@TheRedRaven_ I sincerely thank you for your comment. Sergey, 62 years old. Saint Petersburg. Good luck.

Hello Sergei, Antoine here, from Switzerland! In the present difficult time between Russia and pretty much the rest of the world, I rejoice of your constructive and informative message. Congratulations on having been able to obtain those most precious souvenirs. By the way, I first visited your beautiful home city when I was a young student... when it bore another name, back in July of 1975. Like it is for you, it does not make me a chick of the year! I went back later once, and to Moscow several times, as well as to a number of other places in Russia. My wife (who loves Russian's artists in general, but writers, painters and composers in particular) and I wanted to go back to St-Petersburgh for a few days of "cultural experience"... but... given the present events... this trip might have to be postponed for a long long time... for years certainly, decades perhaps!

@@st-ex8506 Thank you for the comment and for your memories. I do not agree with your statement that almost the whole world is against Russia now. And why do you consider it impossible for yourself to come to Russia for a few days?

@@sergei6572 Impossible it is not. Very difficult however it is. Even some Russian friends of mine, living in Switzerland, and now Swiss citizens, have decided to not visit her mother living in St-Petersburg, as they used to for Christmas. They seem to fear something… him being still a Russian citizen, of “mobilizable” age, and a former officer… If my wife and I love many things in Russia, we absolutely condemn Russia’s behavior in Ukraine. All things we thought the “new” Russia was are being violated! We obviously know that it is not the will of all Russians, but the times are definitely not right for a visit!

Great job! It worked perfectly! 👍🏻👨‍🚀

Who filmed the take-off from the Moon?

That camera on a pole

mhhmm then how'd the film get back ?.....ups?...being sarcastic i know the whole things a fraud.

@@alansharonpisarek1789 Like that movie, Capricorn One? Maybe! ;)

My father was also what was your father's name?

🤣🤣🤣 Yeah, because the magician lets everybody in on the secret of his trick.

There was enough of a signal delay for command to selectively exclude certain transmissions . Your dad was hearing the same "live" transmissions as everyone else.

@@John-ic9ov no.

​@@John-ic9ov Your reply is a non sequitur

1 was 12 too

Nostalgia is a powerful drug. In the 1980s I watched Mickey Mouse with my parents on the tell-a-vision.

Was woken up by my dad to see it live here in England. I was Seven. I have never forgotten it.

You genuinely believe that we actually got to the moon with 1960’s technology?

@@bryannicholas2130 Yes, now shut up.

@@bryannicholas2130 Do you actually believe they couldn't have the technology in the 1960s? The automobile was invented in the late 1800s to early 1900s. People were not as stupid then as they are now.

Dude. Please. If you believe that and get emotional about it, then I hope you've never been responsible for a child . . . or is Santa still real for 'em?!?

The patches may have been blown far away by the rocket blast when they left.

​@@steverobertson6393even the Soviet appreciate the gesture, the goddamns USSR acknowledge it.

@@lesaber251 Unlikely as the accent stage blasted into the decent stage. And in vacuum, that dissipates very quickly. And even if they were, they are still on the moon.

Yeah... and all the bureaucrats and politicians got their names on there, too. Got to keep the funds flowing! Interesting that the only equipment to keep operating was a mirror... probably cost a $1M or so.

Yea bud, it would be cool. Why don't we? How come we can't see the Apollo capsule up close at the Smithsonian anymore. How come China hasn't gone? Why did Russia never go? . . . It must be too hard. Technology and all.

@@steverobertson6393 I'm sure you have a "theory" about it...

@@midiprog2266 Ha ha! Love that! Taking pot shots from the cheap seats. Do you have a chorus of similarly fated-in-life losers behind you? That's how I picture it. Here's how it works MidiProg, if you think you are smarter (and you do) then you need to demonstrate that in some way. I probably do have a theory about "it", because I have lots of em cause I have thoughts. Yea. All the time. I know, it sucks, but they just keep on comin! Good luck, buddy.

@@JuanRivera-gc7fq Nah. It can't. If it could, it would.

The moon is too close for Hubble to get a good resolution, so no it can't.@@JuanRivera-gc7fq

I salute his daring craftiness.

😂

But you must understand that the video we just saw, is a CGI. Not real. In the same way, the television show in 1969, was fake.

@@markuslehtipuu3939 Dude of course video is a CGI isn't it obvious? It is a documentary and every single video on this channel is made by using CGI. Does anyone really think that this video was captured on a moon or the last video on this channel about nuke transportation depicted real nukes?

They also seem oblivious to the fact that there were 6 manned moon landings, not just the one they call faked. So, apparently the first one was not real, and the other 5 didn’t happen at all. Amazing.

American truth about apollo landing on the Moon = american truth about biological weapon in Iraque 2003.America creates its own truth!Opon your eyes and cure your ignorance!

Artemis is planing to make a 'base' of sorts... a mining facility to mine water, use solar power to break the water into Hydrogen and Oxygen, the basic chemicals in rocket feul... we're turning the moon into a gas station.

Western nations decided to devote all their resources to babysitting third world savages.

@@Cliffmchristyeah too bad we never been on the moon

@@dellyirving6702 Far too much evidence to prove otherwise, but keep drinking the apollo denial cult kool-aid.

@@Cliffmchrist so who seen the iss being built?

I was 7 when we went to the Moon. I sort of knew it was a big deal, but at that age, nothing seems impossible lol. We got off school early, Richard Nixon was speaking on the radio when I hopped in the car. I asked my mother what all the fuss was about, and she said it was history being made. Never forgotten that moment.

Same, mine, too.

My dad worked on crew that filmed the moon landings in a large warehouse. Don't believe the nasa lies. Research the alive challenger astronauts. They are still alive today, with the same names. Nasa can't be trusted.

Oh wow. my father worked for Singer-Link as well at Wright Patterson.. on the blue arm that spun up the Astronauts to create G forces. I was 6 when man landed on the moon, was up as well watching history.

I wish I'd had a dad like you did. Don't get me started.

Well, just the amount used for hats around here may impact global supplies.

And yet.. Some idiots still believe it wasn't real..

@@sinabarzyar5766 probably all woke

very helpful comment....i was just thinking how they captured mans first steps on the moon after setting up a camera lol

The first thing you saw Neil do after going down the ladder was going over to the camera and disconnecting it to put farther out on a stand. On Apollo 12 the astronaut tried to point it at the earth before putting it on the stand so we on earth could look at ourselves and got a blip of direct intense sunlight in the lens and fried it.

Did you notice the spacesuit boot overlays which were alleged to be tossed out of the lunar lander before lift off from the lunar surface

In one of those bubble tents, custom made with green screen flooring

@@adaptercrash Would be quite a feat green screen in the 60's

Glued to an electrical device viewing 'strangers' that Tell A Vision? Did'nt your mom tell you not to listen to strangers?

@@SmedleyWarIsaRacket well what else do you think the Government would record it on? the internet?

I was 11 years old. I remember the picture being upside down and very fuzzy. We didn't have the best antenna.

Stanley Kubrick was the first man on the Moon. He had to direct the action.

Not even his style. Wrong. @@1pcfred

Sources? Can they prove it?

@@anthonymoser4096 Naugolnaia, M. N.; Spangenberg, E. E.; Soboleva, N. S.; Fomin, V. A. Determination of selenographic coordinates of objects by RATAN-600. Pisma v Astronomicheskii Zhurnal, vol. 4, Dec. 1978, p. 562-565. (Soviet Astronomy Letters, vol. 4, Nov.-Dec. 1978, p. 302-303). They did prove it.

The actors had a pretty nice trailer, and spent only 3 hours a day filming so it went fairly well I suppose

Walter Cronkite even did updates on Nazi Germany!!… in TNO, the AI alternate timeline.😂😂

Great achievement? More like a great hoax!

Most people have no idea how insane the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo budgets were. In the 60s, American GNP was greater than the sum of the next 12 richest nations, because we were the ONLY major power to come out of WWII with our infrastructure intact. The 4% of the annual budget that America spent on space was at least half the annual budget of any other nation, including the USSR.

@@marksprague1280 yes, exactly. When I visited Cape Canaveral I asked how the US achieved all these amazing things in space. The reply was "lots of money and lots of people!" But it was only possible with these insane budgets. That's why we haven't been back to the moon. It's not worth the cost since we've already been there. Hehe

@@visualonestudio Frankly, it makes no sense to spend a billion dollars to send two men on a 3 day sightseeing trip when the advances on robotics make it possible to send a probe that can perform the same functions indefinitely for a fraction of the cost. Before we send men to the moon and beyond, we need to be able to establish self-supporting habitats -- something that we have thus far been unable to do.

Probably will be Surrounded by Jeff Bezos owned mining rigs. Or a colony of billionaires and multi millionaires moon mansions owned by Elon Musk.

Certainly

Or they can just send it to the museum on Earth from the production studio where it was filmed

@@azzamatic4190 🤪

@@azzamatic4190 Lunar surface footage was TV; not film. You subhumans are getting tiresome.

Yeah, part of the fabric from the left wing! Really cool idea tbh, first ever powered flying machine making it all the way to the moon :)

Also on the mars helicopter. They better stop taking pieces or there will be nothing left!

Orville & Wilbur probably never imagined that pieces of their aircraft would travel to other worlds. But my guess is that bits of it will travel with astronauts to whatever other worlds humans visit@@sgauntt

I did not know that! So cool to honor the Wright Brothers that way!!!

Hahahaha wel that didn't age well, did it. Aircraft technology advanced rapidly over a short space of time, whereas Apollo stands as the singular, solitary event in which technology has gone in reverse. Think about that....the technical data, telemetry, video, all gone never to be repeated? The historical significance is massive, indeed. But shall we remove the elephant from the room for a second.... the Van Allen radiation belts have never, and will never be passed by humans. Fact. Cheers.

​@@deanhall6045 then how did the D.R.I. Laser Reflectors get placed up there ?? 🤔

@@waylonmccrae3546 get with it mate, they weren't put there by humans. Its easy to land anything on the moon, except humans. The Van Allen radiation belts kill humans. Probes and landers can get there, do you really think that humans put those reflectors there ? Really ?

@@waylonmccrae3546 there's zero, nil, absolutely no evidence of anyone ever being there, prove otherwise. I'll save you time, you can't. Cheers.

@@waylonmccrae3546 they weren't put there by humans. Fact.

Before they "lost" proof of telemetry?

@@swervedriver5260 They didn’t lose anything except a backup copy of the slow-scan TV tape. Sotheby’s actually auctioned a set of Apollo 11 tapes a few years back, nearly $2 million from memory..

@@stephenpage-murray7226 Tapes of....

@@stephenpage-murray7226 I'm confused. I thought the telemetry tapes were lost and that the Sotheby's tapes were copies made for broadcasting purposes. Quote: "Some of the media coverage leading up to Sotheby's sale conflated [Gary] George's tapes, which contain footage converted for TV broadcast, with the telemetry tapes that NASA was unable to find in a highly-publicized 2005 search. The confusion resulted in the space agency issuing a statement before the auction that said, in part, that the tapes up for bid "contain no material that hasn't been preserved at NASA."

@@clintflicker2645 Every single item js in the national archives. Look at several projects here on KZfaq that utilise the data.

It was faked.

You’re fake.

@@user-kb2th2om4e How can you fake a day off school???

Conspiracy theory isn't new. Bigfoot, Trolls under bridges...

Same here👍

I was 10 and I recall it the same way!

And I remember hearing all of Santa's reindeer in the Winter of 1984 right there up on the roof of my childhood home.

@@steverobertson6393 Funny watching you try to troll, but really everyone just thinks you're retarted.

Same here. I was 13 at the time.

Ahem.

There's photographs of Apollo 12 and 17. I have seen nothing of Apollo 11. I appreciate you actually responding with actual evidence though, I'm tired of people asking for evidence and getting nothing but religious and shaming language in return lol.

Armstrong took it from the MESA (where it recorded the first steps) and mounted it to a tripod, and carried it to its final spot where it took video of the rest of the moonwalk.

@@rockethead7 That makes sense. You can tell in the footage that it's mounted on the craft. I didn't mean to imply Kubrick put it there.

It was filmed in a studio

Shhhhhhh.

"Jack” Schmitt (the only geologist to walk on the moon.)" Yes, which was a big mistake, there should have been several geologists except perhaps on Apollo 11.

@@rigolonzinbrin Agreed. Actually, they were lucky to even have Schmitt. As it was, he had been scheduled for the cancelled Apollo 18 mission. They had to swap him out with Joe Engle.

"We shall return" ok when? It's been 50 damn years! This moon landing story is getting ridiculous.

@@pedrokantor3997 No one knew it would take that long. It’s great that you can accurately predict everything that’s going to happen in the next 50 years, including what humans will and won’t accomplish, but the majority of people can’t. You want to know why we haven’t returned? 6 words: Space Shuttle and Lack of funding.

@@aerospacematt9147 The longer it takes the less people will believe we've ever been there to begin with. How long can NASA keep this up 60 years? 70? 80? What if it becomes 100 years? You think the majority of people will believe the moon landing story by then? I don't have a crystal ball like you claim, I'm just massively disappointed that we haven't been on the moon in my lifetime and am starting to believe we never did. It just doesn't make sense. And the Russians haven't even tried despite sending the first satellite and humans to space? LOL!

Michael, I worked for a year to get Rockwell to install handrails on both the LM and the Command Module, just to do what you mention - i.e. to go around outside in case the docking mechanisms, which must be removed from the tunnel to permit the crew to crawl back to the CSM from the LM, were damaged and could not be removed from the tunnel. We learned on Gemini that handrails were the simplest and most efficient way of manually controlling yourself during EVA. Since the Apollo spacecrafts were being designed and built during the Gemini program, their design was complete, and we had to convince every Apollo subsystem manager that our handrails wouldn't damage his system ! The first unmanned Apollo mission in earth orbit ended with the handrails on the command module re-entering in perfect shape, much to the approval of the swimmers in the water, who now had rails to hold onto when they swam up the the spacecraft to assist the crew in their exit. We tested them with the crew on Apollo 9 in earth orbit, and thankfully never had to use the in lunar orbit, since the docking hardware, a probe and a drogue, were easily removed by the crew on each of the 6 missions in which the LM and CSM docked in lunar orbit.

A fascinating insight. It's amazing that these days we can be getting input from a person with such first hand knowledge. I'd never realised there was the option to go around the outside! I hadn't even put together the fact that both craft had two hatches.

The original idea was that the forward hatch would also be for docking too. Then the LM as the "active" spacecraft during rendezvous would just fly straight up to the CM and dock. If there was an issue, they could use the top hatch. But those docking adapters take up weight and it was decided to just make the forward hatch strictly for EVA.@@alanm8932

Thanks for sharing that! Another unsung hero! @@frankparker5760

@@alanm8932 There was a lot of back ups or redundancy on a mission of that scope. There had to be. Apollo 13 was proof of that.

Keyword 'production' :-) ... all BS !

Hey why don’t you have a whinge ?

Right. Okay. Sure.

Moonlanding is fake. Wakey Wakey

LOL

The live video was an incredible Public Relations coup. But the real reason for the live video was to allow mission control to observe the mission and get the astronauts to do more in the little time they had. Collect more moon rocks, set up experiment packages more precisely etc. A team of geologists could observe and direct which samples to collect and which to photograph for example.

True about the UV. But there is no atmosphere, so no oxidation or micro-organisms to break down the fibres. There are LRO photos of the sites, where you can see the shadow from the flag move from one photo to another due to the angle of the sun changing. Here is a quote about what LRO found: "From the LROC images it is now certain that the American flags are still standing and casting shadows at all of the sites, except Apollo 11. Astronaut Buzz Aldrin reported that the flag was blown over by the exhaust from the ascent engine during liftoff of Apollo 11, and it looks like he was correct!" End of quote. It has been speculated that the flags would lose its colors and be totally white now.

It’s in space it won’t break down lol

That’s because they ran to Walmart and bought a new one for the film set

Tru. Ever see what the sun does to plastic toys meant to be outside, and you see and feel the break down of plastics.

@@luv2bbq Walmart? The first one had just opened the following month!

Why cgi and not real pictures?

@@bighornriverpaul omg

@@bighornriverpaul Why CGI and not real pictures? Let me try and address that question. This is just a guess, a stab in the dark and only my personal view you understand... Its pure speculation on my part but, I assume 'NEO', this channels author, is just a KZfaqr of limited financial means. I am quite sure that if this channels uploader had access to roughly $11.75 Billion he would have financed the development of a rocket propelled system that would have allowed him to transport an equally expensive remote control drone type camera device approximately 250,000 miles to the Moon and return it over the same distance to Earth. I further assume that this KZfaqr would have figured a way to land the returning spacecraft in his back garden, as those aircraft carriers and the accompanying naval fleet that retrieve returning spacecraft in the mid Pacific Ocean are bloody expensive! I am sorry that the producer of this 9.31 minute KZfaq video didn't satisfy you by going just 'That Extra Mile', but I'm sure that now I have outlined the monetary constraints it would have imposed, why he/she opted for the CGI option.

No, it's not a TV remote which will start working after you swap batteries 😀, the equipments would have suffered significant decay.

@@DarkKnight-OO7 Public, look and listen these deceived souls, who try to go on a light ball (moon) to look for a beings they call "ALIENS". ALIENS - have we ever analysed this word? A LIES N S A LIES - wait a minute, where to place the letter "N"? - for it seems to have no place. Therefore what`s truth is: Hey, public, look and listen these deceived souls, who try to go on a light ball (moon) to look for A LIES.

The moon is of no military or economic value. There will never be colonies unless that changes.

Um, you do know that all of that merchandise already exists, right?

@@rockethead7 Yeah, but it'll be purchased at the actual site

@@RamblinRick_ Sales tax on the moon will be prohibitive.

You do know this video was nothing more than CGI and he could have put lois griffen bent over the luner module and Cleveland Brown pounding that ass like never b4. NASA has lied to you, your GOVT has lied to you and you lying to yourself if you believe this bullshit. Its all fake

Very good point, Sir. It does make a huge difference.

Nice fake pics as one would expect?

​@@rowdyyates4273 i made the photos, yes they are fake and also the sun isn't real, i made that too

@@rowdyyates4273 Leave, subhuman.

Did I miss something? When did he say that he was attempting to show the site at the same time in the lunar day that the astronauts were there?

There’s also the Fallen Astronaut tribute left by the Apollo 15 crew. Small sculpture and a plague naming all astronauts who had died in the pursuit. There’s a few names missing as we hadn’t learned about them yet though

We only "hate" other countries because we are told to through propaganda.

they never went to the moon.. look at their expressions at the first press conference, it was like Christmas day and Santa didn't leave them anything but a lump of coal

You know it was all Faked right ?

You people need to stop drinking there Kool aid

U rlly think they went live from space?

@@DaeJhuan "...went live from space?" Your question makes no sense. Did you even think through your question before posting text that makes no sense? Did you proofread your question before clicking "Reply?" If you did, then I don't know what "went live from space" is supposed to mean. If you want to edit your question so that it makes sense, I'll be glad to respond. But just out of curiosity: Do you believe the Earth is flat?

Not all; there are films, pictures and video.

@@jaybee9269 not a single independent photo of anything allegedly left on the moon

@@maaruz1979 >> What?! Landing sites have been photographed by spacecraft of various nations. Not to mention it’s a silly belief to think the moon landings were faked. No one fakes thousands of engineering drawings!

@@jaybee9269 source? there are no photos of clearly visible landing gear allegedly left behind

@@maaruz1979 >> Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter images are probably the best. I shall not argue consensus reality with you…

So your dad was in his sixties when you were born?

@@kenotube3160 61

Ha ha ha, you're not gonna be in your 20's when "go back" How much ya wanna bet? I'm down for a DM and a legally binding contract. You in? No jokes. I can bet the house, the ranch, the trucks. What are you willing to put up?

@@steverobertson6393 I’ll bet $1,000 USD that humans land on the moon before the I turn 30.

@@tomblaise Humans on the moon. Let's do this. I'll take your money. We'll run it thru my attorney. Before you sign anything, google the "Van Allen Belts". It's not right taking your money because you're a good a trusting person who fell for the lies of scumbags. This isn't your fault. Good people get fooled much more easily than dirtbags like me. Still, I'm in. Respect on your fast reply. Good man!

What's even more amazing is that people actually believed we landed men on the moon.

@@salvation4all313 at last someone in the comment section that is not deluded

@@beyondnow1600 they are *literally* deluded BY definition

That's exactly what my brothers and I did! We went out to our backyard that night and said that!

@@Waldenpunk Wow, that must have actually been awesome, I wish I could've been alive then to see that.

Hoax Folks Bot.

Proverbs 14:12 There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death. Hosea 4:6 My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will also reject thee, that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children. If God isn't real, why did I get visions of what is in the bible a day or so after giving my life fully to God? Why do the new 125 times zoom cameras show images of stars that look like crystal clear squiggling lines? Why have they now photographed lightning sprites that look like they are shooting off of a firmament ceiling that is described in the first 7 verses of the bible? Why have only Freemasons & Mormans (began by a Freemason) been to outer space? Why did Satanist Anton Lavey celebrate his death only to then slip away saying, "oh my, oh my, something's wrong"? Why does billionaire Elon Musk think we live in a video game? Isaiah 65:12 Therefore will I number you to the sword, and ye shall all bow down to the slaughter: because when I called, ye did not answer; when I spake, ye did not hear; but did evil before mine eyes, and did choose that wherein I delighted not.

@@clickhereforshowittoothers2184 WTF are you talking about

@@rockinrobbie1985 Mark 16:15,16 15 And he said unto them, Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to every creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved; but he that believeth not shall be damned. Don't let anybody trick you. The spirit world is a real thing. The billionaires of this world are into Old Testament Say -tan -eesm. It's not fun like they pretend on their Saturday Night Live shows and such. I gave my life fully to God and a day or so later got open eye visions of biblical things. I didn't even know it was from the bible so it's not like I thought those things up in my own mind.

@@clickhereforshowittoothers2184We call that the mountaintop experience. It goes away with time. It’s just your brain messing with you.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Understandable, since there are no cameras closer than the orbiting observatories above the moon's surface.

NASA took some really nice real images of the landing sites on film back in the late 60s and early 70s. But since then it's been digital. I fully support the moon hoax people sending their own missions to check on NASA. Are you involved in that effort?

​@@bradleyrex2968Oh you don't say There are lots of 'pictures' of Bigfoot, the Lock Ness monster,the Abominable Snowman, Dementia Joe voters, etc

@@nyeaglesfootballgarbagemen8346 Well I typed it more than said it. But naming other conspiracy theories is a classic way to deflect. Its a variation on a straw man argument. Good job.

@@bradleyrex2968 Way to parrot a hackneyed phrase I took logic and philosophy courses at a well known university, how about you You don't wish to debate me, kid -- I'll make you look dumber than you already are

Brave 🤣🤣🤣🤣 They’re all actors I cannot believe u think the moon landings are real. Go get mentally examined

@@SelfHealersNutrition what was so technologically unachievable that they had to fake it? They spent billions to develop the rocket and equipment to go there, as well as the astronauts only spent 1 hour in the van Allen belts on there way to the moon. But yeah sure it’s fake smh 🤦‍♂️ dumbass

@@zyzzbrah154 ur a fucking idiot I want u to watch the videos and pictures U can see the obvious cgi, it’s fake The moon isn’t solid ground

@@zyzzbrah154 u can’t even leave low earth orbit We never been back to the moon because we never went to begin U should look at the flimsy space craft that supposedly took them there and back It’s an impossible thing made into a Hollywood fantasy All u believe is lies

Yes and the movie studio will be a landmark one day.

You watched a lovely movie and believed it was real.

@@dimitar297at this point, I don’t even know if people like you actually believe this shit or it’s just a troll looking for a reaction

@@dimitar297 How sad that you are unable to appreciate the achievements of a nation.

@@phildavenport4150 go ahead you celebrate Agent Orange next, same era.

@@dimitar297 Any other irrelevancies you'd like to add?

On six landings they took three. But none on Apollo 11. Did you overlook that?

​@@DeputyNordburgSo where it be

@@CashMoneyCaz da moon.

No "little rover" on the Apollo 11 mission! That was a big deal for you to overlook.

Absolute genius. Believing in a conspiracy without even looking into the simplest details. Truly speaks to your intelligence. Don't reply either and embarrass yourself.

That’s an interesting bit of Apollo history I was not aware of.

@@dansv1 Indeed and I think it says a lot about our relationship with Nature... AS11-4-5850 is the name of the first picture Neil Armstrong took during the Apollo 11 EVA, if you Google it, you'll see the trash bag.

@@Superjeanmarc really doubt the moon has a biosphere to suffer from littering. Not that putting it in a landfill is somehow more healthy for nature either.

So technically someday someone can retrieve those 50 + year old turds? They left their DNA there

The littering was my first thought. We humans litter everywhere we go. In this case necessary though

Very few people think it was faked. Most of the people claiming it was fake are just desperate for attention.

That it did.. And for me it started a life long interest in science and space exploration.

@@the-real-world oh shut up attention seeker. Get out of your conspiracy theory basement and get a job.

Ikr 💯🤦‍♀️

​@@the-real-world 🤡

Why don't all the hoax folks like yourself pool some money and send a mission? Crowd fund it.

Karen Armstrong's bracelet.

That film got so much wrong it's a testament to corrupt revisionists.

Rubbish. AI just called all Apollo moon photos fake. All of them, your own AI. Fraudsters, Armstrong, Collins and especially Aldrin, they should be locked up now that the truth is out. Imagine that, your own AI calling the Chinese probe photos genuine, but Apollo's all fake. Enjoy your awakening.

That’s one of the few moments I’ve ever actually teared up while watching a movie

Yes they accomplished a fake moon landing.

LOL, incredible, isn't it?

​@@squarerootof2yeah... almost unbelievable

@@squarerootof2 Please leave, subhuman. The humans are talking.

@@user-ur9xy6ow3i Please leave, subhuman. The humans are talking.

Lol you are the only person who thinks that lol.

@@DeputyNordburg At least I know the difference between thoughts and facts.

@@tysonatkins2236 Cool. What is it?

There are TONS of memorials and commemorations of Apollo. This is borderline comedy.

You don’t have to be a fæcking actor for you to be on the walk of fame💀💀💀

there are probably two cameras

@@LuekSams There were 5 total. But only one video camera. The rest were still photo, and movie cameras that used film. But again, the sequence above is recorded on video. You can simply watch it happen. It's hard to imagine why people can't grasp the camera being used in 2 different places 30 feet apart.

The logic and evolution of space exploration: 1) First Satellite -> satellites are still running, including the GPS satellites. 2) First Man in Space -> People still fly in space. 3) First Rover -> Rovers and other space vehicles are still sent to the Moon. The latest example of the Chinese Chang'e-4 and the Israeli Beresheet Spacecraft. All of the above has become safer, cheaper and more affordable. This is the logic of the development of any technological process. You can still add mass-effect. It follows that the Americans have to build at least a base on the moon with the constant presence of man there and walk a man on Mars. This is evolution and logic of events. But Americans haven't flown to the moon in half a century!@@bradleyrex2968

Imagine achieving one of the greatest technological feats in human history with one million times less computing power than the phone in your hand right now and repeating it five more times in the next few years and then saying “ok, we’re done here. Nothing else to see or do on the moon.” And then destroying (or losing) all the engineering plans and data so that it cannot be repeated 50 years later by any country in the world…. Oh, wait…@@bradleyrex2968

There was not a camera placed away of the lunar module at the moment of the first step.

You still believe this shit? 🤣

@@johntate5050 Said the gullible believer in dumb online conspiracy theory.

@@johntate5050 Apollo proof: 1. There are over 8,000 photos available to the public of the moon landing missions. 2. There are thousands of hours of video too. 3. Hundreds of kilograms of lunar material that has been studied and verified by astronomers and geologists all over the world and showed chemical signs of being on the moon. 4. The LRRR data laser retroreflector arrays left by Apollo 11, and other subsequent Apollo missions, can still be interacted with today by using powerful enough lasers here on Earth. 5. The SELENE photos which show the damage to the lunar surface where we landed the Apollo missions. 6. The Chang'e 2 photos, which show the lander base. 7. Chandrayaan-2, which managed to photograph another Apollo lander base. 8. A group at Kettering Grammar School, using simple radio equipment, monitored Soviet and U.S. spacecraft and calculated their orbits. 9. Pic du Midi Observatory, which watched Apollo missions all the way to the moon. 10. The Lick Observatory observations during the return coast to Earth produced live television pictures broadcast to United States west coast viewers via KQED-TV in San Francisco 11. Larry Baysinger, a technician for WHAS radio in Louisville, Kentucky, independently detected and recorded transmissions between the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface and the Lunar Module. He could only detect messages FROM the lunar vehicles and not to them, cause the earth was between him and Huston. Also, backyard amateurs all around the world were able to tune in on the Apollo audio (not the video, that would have taken bigger hardware, but, the audio was easy) by pointing their Yagi and/or dishes at the moon. Hundreds (or maybe thousands?) of people in many countries did exactly that. 12. The Soviet Union, who monitored the missions at their Space Transmissions Corps, who's leader Vasily Mishin, in an interview for the article "The Moon Programme That Faltered", describes how the Soviet Moon programme dwindled after the Apollo landing. 13. The absurdity that thousands of people who worked on the Apollo missions would have to be kept silent for years and years without a single person coming forward to claim it was a fraud. 14. In October-November 1977, the Soviet radio telescope RATAN-600 observed all five transmitters of ALSEP scientific packages placed on the Moon surface by all Apollo landing missions excluding Apollo 11. Their selenographic coordinates and the transmitter power outputs (20 W were in agreement with the NASA reports). 15. Images taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter mission beginning in July 2009 show the six Apollo Lunar Module descent stages, Apollo Lunar Surface Experiments Package (ALSEP) science experiments, astronaut footpaths, and lunar rover tire tracks. These images are the most effective proof to date to rebut the "landing hoax" theories. Although this probe was indeed launched by NASA, the camera and the interpretation of the images are under the control of an academic group - the LROC Science Operations Center at Arizona State University, along with many other academic groups. At least some of these groups, such as the German Aerospace Center, Berlin, are not located in the US, and are not funded by the US government. 16. After the images shown here were taken, the LRO mission moved into a lower orbit for higher resolution camera work. All of the sites have since been re-imaged at higher resolution. Comparison of the original 16 mm 17. Apollo 17 LM camera footage during ascent to the 2011 LRO photos of the landing site show an almost exact match of the rover tracks. 18. Further imaging in 2012 shows the shadows cast by the flags planted by the astronauts on all Apollo landing sites. The exception is that of Apollo 11, which matches Buzz Aldrin's account of the flag being blown over by the lander's rocket exhaust on leaving the Moon. 19. Spain and Australia were 2/3rds of the DSN that received all of the TV broadcasts from the moon. 20. Dozens of tracking stations around the world (including from enemies) used radar and radio telescopes to track all of the missions. You can find more info about this on MIT's site. The tracking was accurate to within 1 mile. 21. Spain had the largest telescope on Earth at the time, and used it to photograph the SIVB fuel dumps around the moon (which spanned out for miles, thus were visible to a large enough telescope), as well as the Apollo 13 debris and gas field (same dynamic). 22. There are more than 100,000 photos taken from lunar orbit. 23. The Jodrell Bank Observatory tracked the movements of the Eagle Lunar Module from the beginning of its descent clear down to the lunar surface by monitoring the doppler shift in its telemetry signal.

@@johntate5050 bring actual evidence or stfu

@@Cliffmchrist I'm still waiting for NASA to bring actual evidence rather than their clearly staged footage. I especially like the one where the astronaut is doing a moon walk and the cables lift him up before he makes an attempt to get up. Comedy gold 🤣 NASA weren't on top of the editing game back in the early 70s.

That's really cool man :D

wow great

you should be famous

@@dextynlabelle9326 maybe he would removed once but twice

@@dextynlabelle9326 if he would removed once yes but twice

Already have, called "SLS"...

What is even more amazing is the fact that here we are. Over 50 years later. With computers thousands of times more powerful. And all our modern tech. We still can't land on the moon. And even stranger than that. Is the fact that NOBODY QUESTIONS IT!!!!!!!!

@@kevinh891 Is there any use?

@@sonnylatchstring No. People believe what they are told...

The main tech was rocketry, and it did take them a few years, but they didn't start from scratch. A lot of things were actually very advanced in the 1960s. Consider: * The crewed air speed record set by the X-15 in 1967 (4,520 miles per hour) not only remains unbeaten today, no modern plane even comes close to that speed. * The Concorde, which commenced regular passenger service in the 1970s, was capable of traveling at twice the speed of sound. Today, no passenger plane can even reach 1x the speed of sound. * The Saturn V rocket which was used for the Apollo missions was, until last month, the largest, most powerful rocket ever launched into space. On November 15th, 2022, it was finally superseded by the SLS, which is only _15%_ more powerful. * The crewed bathyscaphe _Trieste_ descended to nearly 7 miles below the surface of the ocean in 1960. Only one other craft has ever gone deeper (and by only 56 feet)! They didn't have snapchat back then, but computer tech isn't what gets you to the Moon, rockets do (and a LOT of money - they spent WAY more than the US budget allots for such endeavours now).

I had never heard about the cash left on the moon. I read they accidentally left a packet of $2 and $20 bills on the lunar surface. They were supposed to be brought back to Earth. Crazy.

@@dansv1 Could the astronauts get a refund on those Does insurance cover "left on the moon"