how crazy is that?

Thanks for reminding how time can change life for good.

💯

He would have been about 15.

@@aemrt5745 My grandmother was born in 1888. She used to say that the hilight of her life was the invention of the movies and Charlie Chaplin in particular. The low point was losing two of her four brothers in WW1. She acknowledged the technical advances that you mention but they were generally too far removed from her everyday life to be very relevant.

@Juicewrld999 Of course it is - there is no atmosphere and thus no wind up there to make it flutter. There is a horizontal rod attached to the flag pole to make the flag look good instead of just hanging downwards, but the flag is only moving when the astronauts are putting it up or when they touch it, as they move closely by it - and for some time afterwards, since there is no atmosphere there to dampen its oscillations, only inner friction in the pole + rod + flag system.

@Juicewrld999 Actually it wasn't - and it was probably blown over during take off by the high velocity exhaust gasses from the ascent module in the A11 case. No it wasn't just 5 ft away, but more like 15 - 20 or so. Anyway the two astronauts had a bit of trouble putting the flag pole up, because it turned out that the lunar soil was pretty hard beneath the thick layer of lunar dust, which of course didn't help either. So on (some of?) the later Apollo missions they would instead put up the flagpole a good bit further away from the LM, and secure the flag pole much better by drilling a hole for it in the hard lunar soil. And these later flag poles with the US flag flying from them still seem to be standing after all these years ( you can see their shadows ), when you look at the "close up" photos ( from a height of 20 - 25 km ) that were taken by the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LOR) that were taken of all 6 Apollo landing sites, when NASA shortly sent the LOR into a more elliptical orbit that allowed it to pass directly over them at relatively low altitudes.

@Bjowolf2 don't waste your brain on these retards. They have no life or purpose. They have to keep themselves busy by questioning the evidence of man's accomplishments and facts. Just ignore them.

@@JamieCrew Yes, you are right, but it's easy to get caught up in their web of ignorance and their lack of curiousity and ability to think for themselves 😉 Thank you 😊

@Juicewrld999 The lander is 31 feet wide (leg to leg). To be 5 feet away from the engine you'd have to be under it.

"You seen one Earth, you seen 'em all!" -- Jack Schmitt, Apollo 17

​@@EriPages Lunar landings were replicated five more times; and the first attempt was very nearly a failure. Also, there were four manned test missions prior to the Apollo 11 landing and many more unmanned ones. You have no idea what you're talking about.

@@EriPages indeed this happened in 1971

@@EriPages I don't even wanna waste my time trying to explain you some basic science... plus I will never never never believe you or whoever's gonna tell the moon landings are fake, you can tell whatever you want, I know the truth, you don't

@@EriPages You're talking in riddles. There's no such word as"REALER". Go away and educate yourself.

Wonder. Even if you died there, you're doing something that only a handful of people have done. Even if you die, you're dying in the midst badass way.

@@-Subtle- That’s totally true up until a point. Every diver that died diving was a hero until diving became common place. Every aviator that died flying made headlines until flying became common. The fear of being forgotten far outweighs the simple fear of death

​@@MyLinguine No one remains remembered for eternity, but what matters is how are you different from the society.

hoax

@@mandrill173 Idiot.

Or maybe they were forced to tell a lie

@@philippfinalizer Reaching like all moon landing deniers

@@philippfinalizerhow dumb do you have to be…

@@GIJames I'm not convinced either way

The depression was living a lie the rest of their life with a gun pointed at them 24/7. Just look at the interview of buzz and niel afterwards.

That's gravity for you.

Keep in mind that the total mass of the Apollo at Canaveral liftoff was 6,200,000 pounds, while the lunar ascender weighed less than 11,000 pounds. That was the biggest difference.

Cgi studio shit 😂😂😂

@@rukawacloudstrife2114 Flat head bastard 💀

@@rukawacloudstrife2114 U dumb for real, man, CGI was primitive as hell up until the 80's when the industry finally started to hammer in and use it for entertainment and research

😂😂😂

fake af

So fake. As an engineer, the tech they had in the 60s wasnt anywhere close to landing on the moom and Taking back off, without any errors, on the first try...

@@toaster3822 I'll also point out that the earth is flat, which falsifies the moon landing on its own.

@@toaster3822 the first try? Are you aware of how many Apollo missions there were? Also, the Russians were watching this from both the inside and outside. If it was a fake, why didn’t they say anything? They would’ve known. There was a huge issue of prestige at play and they acknowledged the achievement.

Maybe Artemis in 2025...

Now it will be much more of a cake walk. Since our last visits to the big space rock, we've sent probes and impacters to verious hard to reach places of the solar system. only issue is getting a safe enough system and suit to do the job with a larger margin of safety this time. We only have our own corperations to beat now.

Speaking of budgets, Arthur C Clark once said that everything you saw in the movie 2001 A Space Odessy could have been developed for the cost of the vietnam war

China is trying to land humans on the moon by 2030 and on mars by 2033 is what I've been hearing. There's still a race with foreign powers.@@dollin9515

we will never go back, shits fake asf

@yony artworks what does this mean? I think it's polish... jinkuyye (thank you) lol

Greta Thunberg - How dare you!

@Greta Thunberg Yes, and Earth is flat, and it was created six thousand years ago by the one and only sky lord.

@Greta Thunberg Ahh yes, the be all and end all of solid evidence. A fucking KZfaq video, made for numpties like you to lap up because you're too desperately thick to be able to tell.

@Greta Thunberg I just went to the video in your link and "thumbs downed". I suggest everyone else do the same.

How are you somehow able to tell it’s 100m away without any visual reference through a 2d screen?

The Horizon Is like 2,3km away buy without reference like mountains or hills it's hard to visualize it

Easiest argument against the non-believers I've ever seen comes from Buzz Aldrin: "If you can disprove the math, you can disprove the landing"

@@dakunism how the f is simulated math any proof for u are u actually retarded or what??

Why hasn't this video been shown before?

@@dakunismmath, hmmmm. 1x1 is ? You see, easy

@@VolkerThimm the 10fps progressive scan valve based video cameras used for live broadcast.

@@jon_collins Not "valve" or vacuum tube based, except for the Epicon tube , which was a cross between a CRT and a silicon diode image matrix

There is tv footage from Apollo 17 EVA, many hours actually, that doesn't look too bad. Most people only seen the horrible (quality) one from Apollo 11. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rKiDrc9-z9ampYE.html for example. I heard that 11's EVA tv was filmed of a monitor in the tracking station and then send to the US for tv. It certainly looks like that in original recordings.

Funny how only the technology for the moon was better in 1969 than it is in 2021.

@Andre I know, its a joke, just like everything the government is telling us. They lied saying meat and butter and eggs were bad, now were finding out they're opposite.

Underrated comment

this is so good dud

LOL 😂

Lmfao

I hate when people tell me to smile right before a photo - that just feels _unnatural._ I prefer when they take spontaneous photos of random cheerful moments instead.

hoax

How to say you are scientifically illiterate without saying you are scientifically illiterate@@mandrill173

​@@mandrill173prove it ret@rd

FAKE ASF

​@mandrill173 You are proof that Crack babies can make it to adulthood. Albeit with a bit of brain damage.

And which footage, exactly, do you think was taken by this mystery "camera man"?

@@Tim22222 the moon footage, the one that is on the video

@@nugs2727 it was one of the astronauts who had gotten out first, set up the camera, and recorded the second one getting out.

@@archierush868 No the cameraman waited for them to arrive

@@nugs2727which is more likely: NASA sending another astronaut without telling anyone to already land on the moon but not have his Lunar Lander within view of the descent of the actual lander and only be there to record them getting out. Or one of them got out first, set up a camera, and record the other getting out.

If that makes people happy, who are we to judge. Rather, we should be happy that there is also content for us out there.

the moon aint the kind kind of place to raise your kids. in fact its cold as hell, and then hot as hell, or something.

@@furadice973 Stand in the middle like a rotisserie chicken

@@furadice973 the song was about Mars, not the moon.

@@Nick-wn1xw Little boy blue and the man on mars.

yea!

Yet still the fake moon landing morons will be out in force.

9:56

😂

We can’t and have never went to space, this is fraudulent

I can’t believe they’re not giggling and cheering the whole Time I wouldn’t be professional enough for this at all

YES IMAGINE, BUT IT WAS A HOAX

@@tedcruzforgayrights2045 Why would you need to be professional? Professional for what? You’d assume these people would show more emotion, it’s weird.

@@TripsX it’s most likely because they’re on a very strict time limit, they have a list of goals to take care of and in brand new territory like this you’d want to stay focused to the mission Anything could happen Also this is just a snippet They spent a whole 21 hours on the moon, which I didn’t know until making this comment, so they probably had their moment at some point

​@@TripsXSeriously? You can't see why it would be needed to be professional?

Thinks it’s coined at NASA “the right stuff”. Brilliant.

7min though out🤔 tHE LINES THAT R HOLDN da ASStronauts UP🤪 VERY VISUAL 9:27🤬.... FAKEM👀N LANDn4$ho

@@edellis2960 Mwhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!

@@edellis2960 you're stupid af

@@edellis2960 ya seriously you're a piece of shit, it would've been harder to fake the moon landing in 1969 than to just do it, and the astronauts left retroreflectors on the moon that are visible by telescope

Let's see the hoaxtards try and explain that.

Michael Clentworth i mean if I was a director making a movie about people going on the moon but shot in a studio, I would take in consideration the communication delay

@@fantin298 ya, these pseudo science moon landing must be stopped lol. they're even making fun of smart anti moon landing ew

OH NO! MY FOOT TRANSFORMED INTO A FOOT, WITH YOUR ASS WRAPED AROUND IT! Rly, go back 2 4chan

Actually, I have longer delays than this using my cell phone calling my friends in The Rockies in 2021. ;-)

I was in High School / Jr. High during the apollo missions and yes... it was and is still exciting to me. Can't wait for the Artemis missions... Ad Astra!

you guys been fooled big time@@JeffreyBue_imtxsmoke

J Calhoun education for those morons is like red cape to a bull

@J Calhoun 🤣 enjoy

@@nikola.trafojer if you claim to know anything about physics... why are you mixing up mass and weight? Pssshhhhh....

@@nikola.trafojer Tbh thats not really the odd part. Jumping your vehicle into the 'air' and then activating thrust to escape the gravity isnt all that hard to do, hell you could do the same with fireworks on Earth, just throw it in the air right before lift off.

Moon escape velocity is 2.4 km/s. not sure that required effort is small.

Thats very cool

Woah lucky i wish

@@jr9710 oh, so I guess all of the billions of other people who have an IQ above room temperature are also lying? That hundreds of years ago people like Galileo figure out the planet was round, hundreds of years later apparently it is flat again? Or at least to the small amount of people who apparently “know the truth”

@@quantumpotential7639 please shut up

But you had no clue it was only going to circle at lower Earth orbit and come right back. Then we were shown this footage from a Hollywood studio.

Question: how are you able to determine scale with absolutely no reference for scale? The craters at the start of the video are several km wide, they just look similar to the ones when they are outside the LM because they basically are the same, just smaller.

@@archierush868 The reference to scale would be the window seal around the porthole being looked through.

@@ChrisNear-gc6cxyes, there are markers on the windows for the astronauts to see an estimate for distance and they also had some sensors and probably radar for that, the question is asked was how were they able to do it here since the camera during descent had none of those markets, and so no easy way to discern scale or distance from the camera at the start of the video.

@@archierush868 The man who posted the comment was talking about ,,just eyeballing it,,,you did not understand his comment and thought you would mix up a word salad trying to sound smart. face it everyone can see this is fake.

Fake. Because NASA lied. USA lied . They all lied .......they never went !

@@Motleymick lying works only for things that cannot be objectively proven, like God, or Santa Claus. Apollo can be proven thus, so lying won't work. Sorry.

@@thewildcellist Just because they made the Apollo does not prove it landed on the moon then flew back to earth. 230,000 miles each way on a single tank of fuel. Sorry not sorry.

@@Motleymick "a single tank of fuel?" Yikes. Space isn't called "space" for nothing. As astronaut Bill Anders put it while enroute to the Moon on Apollo 8, “...Isaac Newton is doing most of the driving now.” Once a spacecraft has momentum, there're no impediments (like atmosphere) to stop it or slow it down, so it takes less fuel than you might think to travel those 230+ thousand miles.

You've been watching too much Star Trek.

Yeah I was a little worried they were gonna run out of fuel on decent. Maybe we can hear the nerves in their voices.

@@TheOneNashon how?

I get that way every time I watch Apollo 13 the movie.

It’s fake

@@rawnuklesWell that wouldn’t happen because the place they filmed it they had a fuel station near by, Hollywood always comes prepared bro !

нас в школе учили что тень на Луне абсолютно черная в виду отсутствия атмосферы и в тени ничего не видно. То что мы видим что то в тени на Земле, это свойства воздуха.

А ещё они оставили там медали в честь первых людей в космосе, таких как Гагарин несмотря на то что тогда была холодная война в разгаре. Очень хороший жест.

​@@bobododoo3925 просто качество обучения в вашей школе плохое. Поэтому вы глупый выросли😊

@@Healton это как посмотреть. В вакууме тень должна быть контрастной, однородной. А атмосферы на луне нет.

We wouldn’t have gotten there without you ruskies

Look again kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gM6me9KIqLjZfmQ.html it looks funny

Don't be so gullible.

@@DoubleoP Wow, you waited a year to post that inane comment.

@@smeeself wow, you're so clever. 😀

@Paul Nope. Just not a conspiracy nutter. ( so... I suppose, relatively, probably. )

Unfortunately, the conspitards aren't radio amateurs, just regular amateurs.

@@ArKritz84 Amateurs? You think they have basic skills? Impossible, some of them claim Antartica is fake and say it’s impossible to go there when the only thing you need to do is fill out a short form and you can go. For the UK, it’s literally a single piece of paper, and tourism is a valid reason to why you can go there. You can’t call these guys amateurs when they cant fill out a single form which can be done in less than 5 minutes

Lies. And as for the USSR, they were run by the same people behind the scenes, the cold war was a psy-op designed to keep both populations living in fear, while at the same time allowing the 13 families who run the world to embezzle hundreds of billions of dollars from both sides.

You guys, are enemies of free, and autonomous thought. What better are you, for the world?! Attacking an entire group of people..(completely unprovoked, to boot.) For having a different point of view, about something. And if your response is anything like, "it's all backed by science". You're just guilty of scientism.. And have no more of the playing field.. than people who don't think the same way. Which basically reduces you both, to bullies, and trolls. Who, by the way, I was intrigued by, at first.. The radio stuff, I had never heard of before. But I am definitely, a moonlanding skeptic. it's too bad your comments digressed the way they did. It's a shameful way to be a human being, you know..

I watched it live. I was 15 years old. What a time to be alive!

Very true. We sure are assholes, but we sure are smart too.

Chills up your spine, seriously?

Kundalini 😅💫

@@Nekomesha ikr lmao

9:59 #leaves on the moon.

@@whatisdoneinthedarkwillbeb9204 That's rocks you smooth brain

No humans went to mokn with that shitty technology lol the only spaceship wich will be able to sent people to moon and mars will be the starship of spacex.. Stop believing this fake story.. It wasnt nasa fault though goverment forced them to lie about this moon landing

@@ArjanTV the fuck kind of Olympic gold medal getting, world record-setting mental gymnastics has you convinced that only SpaceX will succeed in getting us to Moon and Mars, but NASA has faked the moon landing?

@@CommentCritic ikr like if elon was listing to this dude he'd slap the shit back into his ass and out his throat he'd be that pissed off imagine spending ur whole life as a astronaut and go to the moon witch is an amazing feat of ingenuity

Sure. And the earth is flat as your brain. 😂

@@mariepiThere is no stars because the Moon is so bright, if you look up at the nightsky and look for the moon you can see how bright it is yet how dark it is in this Video, that's because they have to turn down the sensitivity of the Camera for it to not look like a white blinding mess.

@@mariepi Im tired of people like you. Stars are not visible cause the camera is recording a really bright surface, and the exposures time was fast, stars are dim, not giving the camera enough light to show up in the photos.

@@ok.6539 What an ignorant reply. It's quite possible the person has no knowledge of this, or could be a young person.

@@kevza1978 Maybe they should learn to educate themselves before implying it's fake then. Young people more than anyone should know how easily you can get information with a 2 second google search.

@@TwitchCronos100 he only said there was no stars and now we've educated him as to why there was no need for everyone to jump down his throat

@Крым,Ялта ,Александр. Nope, not stupid at all. There is no air or wind on the moon. The flag had a horizontal metal tube inserted in a pocket sewn along the top edge. That was to hold the flag out and make it look like it was fluttering in the breeze. Otherwise, it would just drape down over the pole and not be very visible. The movement you can see is the flag settling down after being rammed into the lunar surface. With no air, there's no air resistance on the Moon, so it takes a while for the motion to settle down due to inertia. There is solar wind, but that works differently and would not cause the flag to flutter. Solar wind particles have very little mass and you would not notice any movement they might cause.

Edgar said it’s was a hoax

@@joshuasasfire2759source please. I’d like to see that for myself.

I’m here to tell you that this shit was faker than unicorns!

@@bullymaguire4457 : naive.

True. Recently someone did a study and determined that some of the dust kicked up by the LM's descent engine may have traveled a quarter of the way around the moon before it finally came down.

@@joevignolor4u949 one of the apollo missions also landed near (few hundred feet, I think) a probe we landed earlier, and the dust pretty much stripped all the paint off it and destroyed its lens

@@TheAechBomb You are talking about Apollo 12. They also cut off the probe's TV camera and its robotic arm that had scooped up some lunar soil. Both of those components were brought back and are now in a museum and I've seen them on display. Also, the TV camera had live bacteria living inside of it that was there when the camera was manufactured. It had survived several years being on the moon.

@@joevignolor4u949 I didn't know which one it was, thank you

The only time that flag will ever be 'blowing in the wind'

Post it on Reddit in appropriate subreddit, and it'll get exposure

Francot12 idiots like you who think it is fake?

Couchmann941 idiots like you who thinks this is real

@@Francot12 Chill bro sheeeiiittt.

People are sick and tired of NASA lies and bullshit. We only want to see it exposed and terminated forever.

as you would...

You’re delusional.

Crazy how your comment causes some to react.. says a lot about them.😅

Vande mataram 🇮🇳🇮🇳

@@siddheshnalawade5380 which city u live?

Yes🎉

Vande mataram

Yes I'm from Hyderabad 🚩

www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/

@@ancelrick5396 wow, this is great. Thanks

@@andrewangerer1399 I enjoyed it when I stumbled onto it. They seem to be the complete film rolls, crappy pictures and all

@@ancelrick5396 Wow! Great page Ancel Rick! There is like every photo in Apollo history there!

At age 9, going on 10, it was a magical time to be alive and seeing the first Moon Launch and Landing live on TV. It seemed like an eternity while watching all the prior test Launches from the fatal tragedy of Apollo 1 on through to the Lunar Orbiter to Apollo 11's landing. Then it became a routine mission in a short span of 3 years and 5 months from 11 to 17, with the miracle of Apollo 13 in between. The Space program was bever as exciting since, with the exception of several of the Mars Rover landings.

Possible...😅

@@tamasszakal9834 how?

@@tamasszakal9834it’s not

Sort of. We can't even get service when hiking on a mountain trail, but in 1969 they were able to tranmit via live television-from the Moon? Wow! That is incredible technology that would be nice to have today.

@@journeywithnichole986 are you joking? they couldn’t get service very well back then either, yet they could broadcast from the moon yes. That’s because those things have very little to do with each other

didnt happen

I used to watch film of the Apolo mission as a kid in my space suit my mom made for me, upside down on the couch pretending I was about to lift off on a Saturn V. Still instills so much pride in what we as a unified nation accomplished, and what we contributed to the world.

@L. Dega i mean theres proof, satellites have taken pictures, the Chinese rover on the moon has proven it, and what would the Chinese gain from furthering a American lie if we didnt land on the moon? But no, you're right, we didn't and theres no proof.

@L. Dega no it didn't, it landed in Mare Imbrium which is on the light side of the moon.

@L. Dega ok you've answered nothing. I did the research and gave you an actual location on the moon, which i cross referenced with multiple credible sources and you follow up with " NO!!!! LOL it landed on the far side dude" very convincing argument. But I guess we'll see just how wrong you are when the Artemis program goes back to the moon, with hi-res photos but youll probably deny those as well.

didnt happen

you had me at first lmao well done

This comment is made hundreds of times on every single moon video. Plagiarism at its finest

@@KnoxxJerz exactly

As one who lived through this period, I don’t find it funny at all…despite Kubrick being one of my favorite film makers.

Cool story bro

lucky you if just scrubbing it gets you positive comments...

I left a non positive comment on a similar M landing post and the next time I tried to post one I was banned , they are very sharp at keeping it positive

@@Alanoffer and keeping out the ignorant

its called control@@Alanoffer

Same ones scrubbing all the facts. You need to really dig to find the truth now. This footage is truly unbelievable!! ;) Literally!

Well, he up-converts them with modern CGI, which also cleans it up a bit. But, yes, these were shot on 16mm film, which is far sharper than a low-res TV signal.

- Lorence Welk's favorite phrase.

Já refutado essa mentira nunca mais voltaram

When you grow up, you will laugh like grown-ups do

@@MrDaiseymay Being 59, I'm fairly confident I *_am_* already an adult. And yes we do laugh, at moon landing hoax nuts.

unreal, but unreal. sorry.

@@Mindvirus-ly5ed A one week old obvious sock puppet account belonging to a dishonest dullard spewing baseless nonsense? I’m absolutely shocked. 🤣 Do better, learn.

faketastic

​@@dj-gf9coexactly.. In this video moon seems to have bulges. But in actual it has shallow hole. They just created all this in a studio as best as they can from what they observed from telescope of what moon looks like. But moon didn't look like anything they've shown

​@@ladybuggaming25okay scientist😂. You guys need to go back school lol

didnt happen

in Kerbal space program I always orient myself using the shadow of the landing craft, even after a new update introduced the "altitude from the ground" meter that showed your exact distance to the ground and not to sea level. unfortunately for the astronauts, they don't have 3rd-person-view and magic displays that are always correct

Haynes publishing has a really neat book on the Lunar Rover where that problem is discussed. One component of it is that the less than perfectly clear atmosphere here on Earth give that distance haze effect & and another is the presence of things where we know their general scale, such as trees on distant hills. And there was none of that on the moon.

Scott FW It must be a really weird sensation. Clarity everywhere! Even Mars’ thin atmosphere is enough to give it that Earth like hazy distance. I live in the mountains in Japan and the haze is something that makes every morning look different.

Thats cuz the moon isnt real is an artificial megastructure made by god to watch over earth... depth of craters isnt adding up to the moon tickness ratio and the moon itself seems to be hollow inside at ceirtan depth

@@maximpikalev9538 exactly----what I thought

didnt happen

@@mandrill173how fucking dumb do you have to be to say “didn’t happen” on every comment you find with 0 explanations, while also posting about politics. Like my favorite scientist, Bill Nye said: “Grow the fuck up”

Greta Thunberg you’re fake.

@Greta Thunberg ???

@Greta Thunberg Can you prove it's fake?

It was amazing....and still is.

didnt happen

I'm guessing your girlfriend says that phrase to you A LOT @@mandrill173

We didn't watch the first Apollo landing live actually - nor the other ones! - we only listened to the intense radio traffic. Many people still believe that they did watch the Apollo landing(s) live, but that is a false memory. What we did watch however - and have been seeing since then - are "video clips" made from the 16 mm film shot by a small film camera placed above Buzz Aldrin's head. A "small" B&W TV camera producing a live TV-signal would have been far too big to sit in that position back in those days. So they had to get the Apollo crews back to Earth first and develop their 16 mm films first, before we could see what their lunar landings actually looked like This is of course also the case with the films that were shot out of the LEM window by the same fixed 16 mm camera - showing the activities of the two Apollo astronauts ( flag mounting, setting up technical equipment etc. ) on the lunar surface.

Kinda hard to in those suits.

@@PanzerkampfwagenausfTschechosl if they can hammer a pole into the ground, they can lift their arm to thumbs up...

@@terpz47 The reason they couldn't hammer it in was because of the surface

@@gabedrinkswaterthey hammered it pretty well seeing as when they flew off you could see the amount of force was blown onto it and it didnt fall over…

@@SincerelyYoursLIVE it literally fell over

Yeah, they threw their PLSS (Personal Life Support System) out the hatch of the LM before ascent to save weight.

@@campbellwright3743 as moon landing is due on in future wish they retrieve the same and bring it back to earth to check what solar flare effect.

If NASA filmed themselves on the sun the pro-Apollo-nutters would __100%___ believe it and we would be the "conspiracy theorists" for even questioning it.

Correct.

it flaps

@@langraman8756 Really flaps during the liftoff..

@@neilbishop1686 You would too if you were standing next to that exhaust. As for the movement that is nothing more than the flexible tubular aluminum pole being twisted and moved when it is being touched. It never moved after they left it alone.

@@pleasepermitmetospeakohgre1504 That's just the wind.

Mr Man Too, its really interesting

My dad said we was offered a trip just into orbit and back when he was working for this company. It would have been like $300k and that was in 70s

That last part is very cool, but sadly that'd be like a thing during the age of being a type 2 civilisation with multiple stars to travel across.

@@stmsin even if he had accepted that, it likely would have never happened anyways. considering we have only had one singular private mission to low earth orbit in that style, that happening in the 70s is a pipedream. the majority of spaceflight startups die within a year or two. SpaceX was a good example of how close and fast bankruptcy comes.

commercial space travel will be sick.

Then getting a really bad itch on your nose.😨

And realizing that you don’t know the difference between your and you’re.

@@johnp139 it’s a KZfaq comment. Not a college paper. If I wanna half ass type something I can and will. Go unalive youself

The difference between 'live' and the film they brought back makes all the video worth it. You need to dig the internet some but there are hours of moon footage from film.

They had reliable communication with the module lander. It really was a feat. Lots of math involved. Apollo 13 was the only mission I think that didn’t land on the moon.

@@cwstewartjr1973 where do you think we get radio waves and microwaves and heat waves from? The air around us. Even then communication existed even in the early 1900s. So if your phone loses signal take it with your phone company. They should have towers around your area. You’re paying them to provide a service without interruption.

The flag is not moving at all when not touched (but for specific cases when gases where released near it).

One of the greatest hoax in human history*

@@tehflooper you are one of the dumbest people of human history*

@@kinderfett5259 "luk at me, im intelligent, you dumb, nasa nasa, usa usa".

@@tehflooper ?

anyways, ohh my check from NASA finally came.

didnt happen

I think he was also one of the astronaut in this video. He also landed on the moon but i can’t remember which one, but i think it’s 14

@@archierush868 Yes, that is him in the suit with the commander’s red stripes.

⁠@@dansv1I knew he was in this one. Also played golf on the moon

Because its all fake lol

@@xxmemekipxxlastname4846is an idiot prove it then.

@@wolfbbq6076 you prove that it did happen.

XxMemekipxX last name The vast body of evidence supports the reality of the Apollo programme. The onus is on you - and pointing at images declaring them to be fake because of “reasons” is not evidence. I wait with baited breath.......

@@martinc3918 dude i dont understand half the words youre saying but thats not proof it happened

didnt happen

It’d be a dusty, irradiated piece of white nylon, if indeed you could bring it back in one piece.

the distance would freak me out lol

yes, like destroying the mother earth isn't exciting anymore, lets discover some more to satisfy the human ego

​@@chandruishwar1what?

I agree, but something that makes me sad is realising that 99% of the time the celestial beings are barren. When considering how empty and lifeless most are, it makes me feel so special and lucky to live on Earth, with its millions of creatures and wonders.

@@chandruishwar1 What are you doing to help? Recycling plastic?

That's what confirmed it wasn't faked (as people have said), for me.

Good observation. I always wondered how close ups of the gold thermal wrap around the LM's legs dont appear to show any dust.

@@rtreaper9985 YEP< it would be stupid to repeat the mistakes , the second time around.

Looks like landing would have kicked so much dust that they wouldn't see anything for days. It was clear immediately.

That dust is actually a huge hazard for the astronauts and equipment. It's so fine and sharp, it is terrible if you inhale it.

It may turn out to be the Soviet Moon rover.

Then go test it

Thank you!

@@ollyb7371 Your brain cells must be fake too :)

@@ollyb7371 You re wellcome 👍

@@ollyb7371 Where was _your_ useful contribution? You just said some unproven claim in 3 words.

@@ollyb7371 You didn't .You just trew up your conspiracy garbage and didn't even bother to explain .