These are fantastic and a real joy to watch. Thanks so much!
@space1commander2 жыл бұрын
Beautifully explained, one of the best I have ever seen about approach charts. Thank You for such great life or death information.
@abbieamavi3 жыл бұрын
ok, now after watching the full video, this has to be THE BEST IAP review video I've ever found. It's perfect, thank you so much for creating + sharing :D
@johnwinter97074 жыл бұрын
Great refresher pointers!
@olgastrika61853 жыл бұрын
Thanks! One of the best channel!!! I Need it for my interpreting services in aviation
@qasiminfo4 жыл бұрын
You guys are legends ❤️ thank u for such informative videos
@pilot_gibbs21594 жыл бұрын
Nice job explaining plates man!
@abbieamavi3 жыл бұрын
*highly recommend the TERPS! I sure didn't read all 500 pages of it, but it's really interesting and explains the "why" and "how" behind why Instrument approaches are made the way they are* Pretty heavy on the math and nerd out, pretty cool :)
@jortiz424 жыл бұрын
Excellent explication, Thanks.
@bobbypatterson74813 жыл бұрын
Exceptional, easily digestible and understood.
@raccoonair4 жыл бұрын
Excellent, thank you.
@emreyilmaz20383 жыл бұрын
Again a very nice video !!!!!
@dannymitchell99712 жыл бұрын
This was really good. Thanks for the vid
@rashwal82 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for this. I'm using Sporty's, but it goes too quickly over the actual chart. This was a great supplement to that.
@benjaminpohl Жыл бұрын
This guy makes me wish I went to ERAU.
@OjDidit7700 Жыл бұрын
I wanna buy this guy a beer
@mdpilot37722 жыл бұрын
Thanks much! You don't use it ya lose it...
@MrWill19273 жыл бұрын
At 4:44 you say that an “A-NA” (Alternate not authorized) means that this airport is NOT authorized as an alternate airport... but I believe that this just means that this specific approach plate is not authorized as an alternate. There may be another approach plate for that airport that IS authorized as an alternate. Let me know if I’m wrong.
@majidcassim49533 жыл бұрын
You're correct, at KMGJ the ILS 04 is A/NA but the RNAV approaches are authorised for alternate uses
@akrammy92514 жыл бұрын
☝ excelent .
@Virtualmix2 жыл бұрын
In the Jeppesen definition document, they define the FAF as "a specified point on a non-precision approach..." and define the FAP as "a specified point on the glide path of a precision approach...". So precision approaches don't have a FAF, they have a FAP instead. They also note: "The FAF is coincident with the FAP on a localizer based non-precision approach". (At 12:45 we can see FAP and FAF aren't always coincident) That's all, just thought it would be worth sharing since I was a little confused. Thanks for the invaluable videos!
@4roubaix3 жыл бұрын
GREAT. KEEP THE MAN ON STAFF :)
@stricklandgarageaviation28643 жыл бұрын
Excellent presentation
@theangrypc46423 жыл бұрын
Here's a question I've always had. Why does the FAA call Glide Slope Intercept the FAF for a precision approach when it's also used for RNAV approaches (non-precision) with LNAV/VNAV and LPV minima? Would it not be more accurate to say it is the FAF for any approach with vertical guidance? I'm sure it's a hold over from before RNAV became so prevalent with GPS, but still it's an easy wording change they should make.
@Sertao20132 жыл бұрын
What is a BLOC approach and what does Bloc stand for ?
@rg9973 жыл бұрын
Question: on landing minimum, what is landing fix minimums? And when to use?
@jollylawyer9999 Жыл бұрын
It depends on what you are using for the approach I guess. Like if you are using lnav vnav blah blah something like that.
@diamondbreak4 жыл бұрын
what does a TCH on an approach chart mean to us practically? What's the use of it while briefing?
@diamondbreak4 жыл бұрын
Charlie Sierra I know the meaning but what I wanna know is what is the use of it in an approach briefing? What affects a landing aircraft when it varies from the standard 50 feet?
@schoneschone4 жыл бұрын
diamondbreak you have to remember these charts are made for airplanes of all sizes as part of the service the FAA gives for its users. TCH is more critical for faster jets as any foot crossed above the TCH, assuming you continue the same decent angle will result in a longer landing run. The longer the landing run, the less runway available for you to stop. Especially given precipitation or contamination such as snow. TCH i think is also used to calculate and generate your LPV or at the very least used to be used to generate a VNAV for LNAV/VNAV equipped airplanes utilizing that approach minima and capability.
@dimasmahesaputra21023 жыл бұрын
what happens if we extend the outbound app?
@chemsh58872 жыл бұрын
Thanks sir*****
@stratosbou79333 жыл бұрын
What is the minimum altitude that provides obstacle clearance, within 25nm, for an aircraft approaching with a course of 130°
@user-wn1xo8ei4r3 жыл бұрын
Be atc's there
@noonelimits Жыл бұрын
TPP is vcalid for 56 days not 28 days , how could you wrong that ??
@lamberto64053 жыл бұрын
Sorry, I'm just starting my instrument training and trying to learn as much as possible. At 3:47, is states that "Circling NA southeast of Rwy 3-21". I don't understand this... This is an ILS approach, what circling is involved here???
@Mike163392 жыл бұрын
There are 3 other runways you could land on besides the one the approach is taking you to. Runways 3, 17, and 35. You can shoot an ILS down to circling mins and circle to whatever runways you're cleared for.