Are Luxury Brands Overpriced? - SimplyPodLogical #73

  Рет қаралды 227,734

SimplyPodLogical

SimplyPodLogical

Күн бұрын

On this episode of SimplyPodLogical, Cristine and Ben talk about luxury brands, consumerism, brand vs art value, fake jewelry, Fiji water, and expensive nail polish.
0:00 - Hey what’s up holo everyone
0:21 - Cristine reviewed Gucci nail polish on Simply Nailogical
3:21 - Do Ben and Cristine own luxury goods?
4:26 - Are Cristine's hoodies a luxury item?
7:58 - Ben’s parents didn’t want to buy him brand name clothes as a kid
10:09 - Branding vs art/fashion
18:46 - Do luxury goods appreciate in value?
22:25 - Are luxury goods art pieces?
24:43 - Were all the cool kids in high school just the rich kids?
32:07 - What overpriced products do Ben and Cristine buy?
36:19 - Is Holo Taco a luxury brand?
38:24 - Unicorn Pee nail polish
41:11 - Should companies be more transparent about profit margins?
43:43 - What made us think people were rich when we were children?
44:51 - Ethical consumerism and product hauls
48:44 - Has Cristine rejected sponsorship offers from luxury brands?
50:33 - Exposing our luxury purchases
56:13 - Eat the rich?
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Follow the simplypod and drop us some episode topic suggestions!:
/ simplypodlogica
/ simplypodlogical
/ simplypodlogical
/ simplypodlogical
/ discord (drop pod topic suggestions in # 📝stream-podcast-ideas thread!)
Cristine:
/ simplynailogical
www.holotaco.com
/ nailogical
/ simplynailogica
/ simplynailogical
/ simplynailogical
Ben:
/ simplybenlogica
/ simplybenlogical
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
Shop items from our Podcast set on my Amazon storefront! www.amazon.com/shop/simplynai...
(affiliate link)
©Simply Nailogical Inc. All opinions are our own.

Пікірлер: 973
@michelleberube5263
@michelleberube5263 2 жыл бұрын
As consumers, we should support brands who are doing something over and above the average. I'll pay more if a company: - pays a living wage - uses sustainable environmental practices - support local raw materials providers - provide health and wellness to employees - Engage in a circular economy - transparent in reporting practices - social enterprises If a business doesn't give me a reason to pay them more, I will always purchase the more affordable option.
@marygracemcgrath
@marygracemcgrath 2 жыл бұрын
Here for this!💗
@manicpixiecremegirl
@manicpixiecremegirl 2 жыл бұрын
yes! definitely!
@RachaelTheRed
@RachaelTheRed 2 жыл бұрын
That's why I try to support companies that are certified B Corps. While not everyone with good practices is certified, everyone that is certified has good practices so it's a great place to start.
@ginaplopper-norton8839
@ginaplopper-norton8839 2 жыл бұрын
I cannot agree with this comment more!
@plenilunium
@plenilunium 2 жыл бұрын
I do support this argument but there are people in society whom can not afford the ethical pricing of such clothing items. The only thing their mental state can be worried about is: "What am I going to be able to cook for my family tonight?" Edit: So they are more likely to opt for a tee that is priced for 2 dollars at H&M.
@vidyabollavaram7830
@vidyabollavaram7830 2 жыл бұрын
I actually really appreciate Cristine’s answer about being able to eat out regularly as a pretty big benefit of wealth and and an example of exorbitant expenditure. It’s not as flashy and appealing to say as “I went out and bought a Chanel purse with my new money” but it’s worth recognising. I remember growing up, we went out not more than once a month to eat at even a regular restaurant because why go out when you can make similar if not the same food at a fraction of that cost. When compared to that, regularly being able to eat out at nice restaurants without need for consideration of cost is pretty significant.
@whitneypanda
@whitneypanda 2 жыл бұрын
Very true, and for me being able to eat out or get take out when I’m having a really busy or stressful day is a huge privilege which I am so thankful for.
@kaiwryn
@kaiwryn 2 жыл бұрын
This is such a huge place were people can save or spend money. I think people who have enough income to eat out more than very occasionally really underestimate this expense and it's such an easy one to let creep up on you-as many people advance in their careers they just start eating out more often and at more expensive restaurants and barely even think about it. The convenience of being able to just order food when you're busy and not worry about the cost, or to just say yes to a dinner date with a friend instead of trying to negotiate into a free activity is just so immense-probably one of the biggest luxuries that exist IMO.
@qwmx
@qwmx 2 жыл бұрын
Now that you said this, I realise Cristine's statement comes from a shallow observation of society. Some people have to work long crazy hours and get very little rest in between, going home, needing to feed yourself and making time to clean up after yourself when you're already tired, depressed (or suffering from clinical depression), and add on top of that doing house chores (e.g. laundry, house repairs), which they all have to muster the physical and mental energy to be able to do in the first place. In this day and age, it's hard to enjoy your life while sticking to a low paying job which doesn't give you much free time to take up hobbies because you have to work an extra job to even be able to afford to pay your rent while still even making sure you can rest properly, which is pretty hard to achieve with only a 9 hours left only for sleep, before you have to repeat your schedule the next day. A fancy meal might even be what people are "living for" and that's why they go out to eat with friends at fancy places every night. I personally would just go for a fast food option, it still costs more than making food at home for me, but I at least get some sort of sustenance and have enough energy to brush my teeth and take a shower, which are basic things I have trouble maintaining. I'm in Australia, and I'm on welfare, but I don't have a degree, I have a medical problem which basically stops me from doing blue collar work, so I can't be a waitress anymore, which is the ONLY job I can get, because all the reception and entry level jobs are reserved for people with "work experience" in private enterprises, not even in volunteering, so now I'm going back to university and still things haven't changed while studying for my degree. I have PTSD from past stress and trauma from schooling and it's been hell for me. However, I am lucky to have relatives to support me and have a welfare system to help me and my relatives ease the financial burdens I place on them physically and mentally, without that, I'd be a theif, or worse. Thinking how in other countries where people don't even get welfare at all, I understand why people would do splurge a bit. I'm not trying to argue with you, I just want to share with you my perspective as someone who no longer can even get a job in a much more "open" industry. I'm poor and struggle to get out of bed to even be able to care for myself, not even because of a physical condition, but also a mental condition. However that is not to say that there aren't people who are rich and can spend their money carefree on luxuries, but there are also poor people who are raised without the needed finance minded mentality in Australia which drive themselves further into poverty and sometimes disaster strikes and everyone has to work harder, longer and become more sadder and soon, develop depression. My family seem richer than others because while we don't spend it on eating out often, we are able to afford other nice luxuries like a Nintendo switch and some switch games (rather my relatives had some money saved up and wanted to make min and their lives a little more enjoyae) You are right, it is a benefit if wealth to eat out at fancy restaurants carefree, but whether it's a strong indicator of someone's wealth, I would say, there is some truth to that, not the complete story. To me, if someone and their family can eat out regularly, fly to 10 or more different countries for leisure and even do so during times when it's not even holiday season in their home countries (as those are usually during work times of the year where companies don't give breaks) and their parents can even afford to pay the high land tax of their nice home and sleep easy at night before the age of 20 they're well-off, all that even in individual activities costs way more than my switch and my three switch games which in total take up a about a month's standard rent, located in a somewhat shitty place. I think they're rich. They clearly live a good non-drama filled life if all they can do is whinge about their parents talking about going on another trip to New Zealand and they just want to stay at home and get offended when you say they're lucky because you've never been outside the country and just to tell their parents to stop talking to them about going on more trips. I once know this person who posted on Facebook complaining about wanting to stay home instead of going on another trip. I said she was lucky and just to tell her mum she doesn't want to go, she got offended, someone else pointed out that she sounds more like she was bragging than complaining. To give her credit, she did say she did tell her mum she wants to stay at home, but her mum wasn't even nagging her, she was just inviting her to a trip which she can easily decline and just stay at home, and she was complaining about that LOL. She's a nice person, but I'm glad I don't talk to her anymore because she's that type of butt hurt whinger. That's my perspective anyway. I hope what I said is understandable.
@maheklaul8622
@maheklaul8622 2 жыл бұрын
ben’s hair in this is wildin
@marysmith3057
@marysmith3057 2 жыл бұрын
I bet Cristine was dreading making the thumbnail 😂
@saratakkoush6109
@saratakkoush6109 2 жыл бұрын
@@marysmith3057 she was😂 she shared it on insta stories
@muddbug
@muddbug 2 жыл бұрын
I’m laughing so hard at this comment
@lauraladyll
@lauraladyll 2 жыл бұрын
That was the first thing I noticed when opening this video. There is a lot of volume happening.
@marysmith3057
@marysmith3057 2 жыл бұрын
@@saratakkoush6109 I just saw that 😂 the first crop looked like Bart Simpsons hair
@lilyt7868
@lilyt7868 2 жыл бұрын
on the eat the rich subject: when i say eat the rich i basically mean “there is no ethical way to make a billion dollars” if you have a salary of 100k/yr without paying tax(which billionaires don’t do) you’d be a millionaire in 10 years. thats ethical. with the same salary, it would take 10,000 years to become a billionaire. there is no way you can earn that by “working hard” when i say eat the rich i dont mean general millionaires, i mean billionaires who exploit mostly immigrants and pay them less than $5/hr
@meganw8310
@meganw8310 2 жыл бұрын
This is a super valid point! I think people get annoyed/upset with the “eat the rich” thing when people comment that under someone’s video where it is clear they are middle class and likely they or their parents worked hard to get where they’re at.
@Lee-hq1er
@Lee-hq1er 2 жыл бұрын
What about billionaire property developers I mean the potential exploitation of workers would seem fairly minimal as trades work can be quite highly paid, I’m guessing the more unethical aspect would be pollution and resource usage
@jaash7981
@jaash7981 2 жыл бұрын
Also every single billionaire in the western world (or at least the most popular ones) isn't even an "I started with nothing" person. It's just old money that keep passing along every generation.
@xBloodGarnetx
@xBloodGarnetx 2 жыл бұрын
@@jaash7981 Hey, it was just a small emerald mine, that's practically nothing 🙄🙄🙄
@mandarightnow
@mandarightnow 2 жыл бұрын
@@Lee-hq1er withholding housing from people who need it for the sake of a profit is monstrous imo
@chelseyilvento4481
@chelseyilvento4481 2 жыл бұрын
So when is the “my boyfriend does blind fancy water taste test” video coming out?
@MellaLicious
@MellaLicious 2 жыл бұрын
I’d watch this
@pjnkblue
@pjnkblue 2 жыл бұрын
Absolutely ready to be amazed by the hydro homie
@lindsaymccracken6078
@lindsaymccracken6078 2 жыл бұрын
This must happen.
@micheal2458
@micheal2458 2 жыл бұрын
Yes, the people are waiting lol
@qwmx
@qwmx 2 жыл бұрын
Voss might be ranked at the same level as standard price store bought brands.
@oscarwildess279
@oscarwildess279 2 жыл бұрын
Just remember just because it’s designer doesn’t mean it’s ethical or better sourced material. Most of Gucci’s ready to wear (T-shirt’s and stuff you can buy online or at a retail store) are made in sweatshops in Tuscany’s Little China where people work for less than 2 euros a day
@miniciominiciominicio
@miniciominiciominicio 2 жыл бұрын
32:37 Ben: I mean, it’s ONE banana, Cristine. What could it cost? $10? That was a perfect reference, Ben. **chef’s kiss**
@starsxmoonxclouds
@starsxmoonxclouds 2 жыл бұрын
Yes!!! I was so happy he quoted this hahaha
@yola6855
@yola6855 2 жыл бұрын
Whats the reference? I am sorry to say I do not recognize it.
@miniciominiciominicio
@miniciominiciominicio 2 жыл бұрын
@@yola6855 Arrested Development
@ChiakiVALover
@ChiakiVALover 2 жыл бұрын
A $10 BENana
@tismejess
@tismejess 2 жыл бұрын
came here to see if anyone noticed!
@Katielovegood44
@Katielovegood44 2 жыл бұрын
Ben hit the nail on the head.. we as individuals can do lots that environmentally friendly but we need the big companies to change things up to actually make a change.
@niamhworrell3334
@niamhworrell3334 2 жыл бұрын
Sunglasses, cat ears and a robe…. Cristine is living the dream
@lilyflower50099
@lilyflower50099 2 жыл бұрын
i like your pfp
@niamhworrell3334
@niamhworrell3334 2 жыл бұрын
@@lilyflower50099 ty!
@amac0190
@amac0190 2 жыл бұрын
She is a leisuring 32YO lady
@not_caroll
@not_caroll 2 жыл бұрын
Cristine in a KZfaq robe and sunglasses is a mood. Just like a sock, but upgraded 🧦
@oliviaaa3400
@oliviaaa3400 2 жыл бұрын
she's leisuring
@cornbreadandsourcream
@cornbreadandsourcream 2 жыл бұрын
The Lululemon founder, Chip Wilson, is racist (picked the name because Chinese people couldn't pronounce it), misogynistic (when confronted with the quality of the leggings and that they tended to thin between the thighs he said something to the tune of them not being meant for fat women) and though he is no longer involved people have long memories. On a personal level I also feel that the company's ideals and branding is a bit like a cult and that's pretty gross when we're talking about a corporation.
@judyh3707
@judyh3707 2 жыл бұрын
Disgusting. Kinda wish I hadn't bought any
@xBloodGarnetx
@xBloodGarnetx 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, I remembered this kinda discourse around the brand. I'm too chubby to pander to this nonsense.
@lizalove91
@lizalove91 2 жыл бұрын
Yeahh I knew a girl (a white girl) who was really into it and used to teach yoga classes there and she got a giant tattoo of Ganesh and the cultural appropriation was so f-ckin gross and I feel like they’re all like that. Also the whole idea of naming their products “THE water bottle”like you absolutely need a $30 water bottle
@DoofytheDoof
@DoofytheDoof 2 жыл бұрын
All of this and a side of fries. He supported and sweatshops because he said it would help underprivileged countries. He blamed birth control and women in the workplace for the rise of divorces and breast cancer. I know that sweatshops are very common, but outright saying you use them is crazy. The company also lied about their specialty fabrics, and their response to the investigation was “feel it, it doesn’t feel like cotton”. I think the company still has a stain of him, but their fabric quality has also gone down apparently causing for chafing to be extra common. I know most people don’t know this so I’m glad you’re making people aware, even if it’s abnormal in the athletic clothes world.
@losthope98
@losthope98 2 жыл бұрын
Glad this was brought up. A lot of people don't like Lululemon for many reasons, including a lot of ethical ones
@sykoskier18
@sykoskier18 2 жыл бұрын
I just wanted to drop a note saying I REALLY love this podcast. I don't even like Simply Nailogical (sorry) that energy just aint me. But I vibe so hard with Ben and Christine during the podcasts. SO GOOD. Thank you both for doing the podcast!! I'm hooked.
@KF-tq2df
@KF-tq2df 2 жыл бұрын
DUDEEE SAME. I honestly have watched 0 nailogical and to be honestly don’t actually give a shit about nails. But it is just so nice listening to two adults have an interesting mature but funny conversation ! And love seeing the way they navigate having differing opinions in such a respectful way
@sarina8045
@sarina8045 2 жыл бұрын
Same here!! I never watched her Yt videos. I’m so glad I gave this podcast a chance. They are both so articulate and mature, and even hilarious at times.
@SoVidushi
@SoVidushi 2 жыл бұрын
I found her channel through the podcast. I see some people in the replies who have never seen a nailogical video because they don't care about nails and i think you should check out some at least, because her videos are more about the humour rather than the nails.
@sarina8045
@sarina8045 2 жыл бұрын
@@SoVidushi I have watched a few but they are too overwhelming for me tbh lol. I prefer this chill setting 😇
@SoVidushi
@SoVidushi 2 жыл бұрын
@@sarina8045 ooh gotcha, i like the high energy videos because they are a nice change from how low energy i am.
@lararenji8
@lararenji8 2 жыл бұрын
Tiffany actually won't buy back their own jewellery cos they don't want to admit to consumers that diamonds depreciate unless they are literally the size of texas. Gold however retains its value.
@abbyl4621
@abbyl4621 2 жыл бұрын
It is jewelers who sold us the idea that diamonds are valuable and a must have for engagements. (That 3 months salary price tag) Diamonds can also be man made. I agree with cristine in that cz is sparklier
@micheal2458
@micheal2458 2 жыл бұрын
I've never understood the statement that gold retains its value, because when I've worked with it (jewelry making and whatnot) it was always important to know what the current rate was...?
@avniprakash9879
@avniprakash9879 2 жыл бұрын
A lot of brands in india buy back diamonds, but u should have the card of the particular jewelry via GIA ( it's an authentication for gems etc) . Now a lot of brands also like reusing diamond
@lararenji8
@lararenji8 2 жыл бұрын
@@avniprakash9879 i've heard that, do they give you back the same value (of just the diamond) you paid?
@lararenji8
@lararenji8 2 жыл бұрын
@@micheal2458 like there is always value in gold because countries use it for treasuries. Diamonds aren't linked to money.😊
@barghast
@barghast 2 жыл бұрын
When I say "Eat the rich" I mean eat the rich who don't pay their taxes, or the rich who deliberately take advantage of loopholes to avoid paying the tax they should pay their own country. Or the people who hoard their extreme wealth and don't use it to stimulate the economy. The problem is not being rich, the problem is being selfish and rich.
@candace200
@candace200 2 жыл бұрын
You can include those who only invest back into the stock market instead of actually "trickling down" into their businesses and employees.
@FrancesBaconandEggs
@FrancesBaconandEggs Жыл бұрын
Yes!!! It just isn’t possible to be an ethical billionaire. It necessarily involves exploitation of others and not paying taxes. When we say “eat the rich” we don’t mean the millionaires who worked their asses off and built an ethical, sustainable company that pays their workers fairly (I’m thinking vlogbrothers here).
@caseymcbride6457
@caseymcbride6457 2 жыл бұрын
On the subject of paying for a more expensive brand vs something like Walmart or amazon, I think its important to remember that price tag does not equate to whether a product was made ethically/sustainably. Most clothing brands at any and all price points rely on unethical practices and contribute to climate change. So just because a brand like Lululemon or American Eagle have higher prices points doesn't necessarily mean that sweatshops weren't involved in the process of making those clothes. Even many brands that claim to be ethical aren't as ethical as they would like us to believe. I just think its an important point to keep in mind when having these conversations because only equating sweatshops and unethical working conditions with cheaper clothing options feels a bit classist/poor shaming when most clothes are made essentially the same way regardless of price tag. I really love the way Ben and Cristine aren't scared of diving into different topics that I rarely see bigger youtubers wanting to discuss
@jinxie8
@jinxie8 2 жыл бұрын
I appreciate Ben bringing up that feeling of “wanting to fit in” in high school. As someone who wasn’t well off, it was a big deal when I could manage to get those couple pieces of popular store shirts and I made sure it said where it was from. Maybe it was off the clearance rack, but I had it. I’m sure there are some industries where that’s necessary in order to feel like you fit in with your co-workers.
@prettyhottie45
@prettyhottie45 2 жыл бұрын
Diamonds have little value in themselves - the value is manufactured by those who control the diamond supply. They immediately lose value when purchased because people don't want "used" diamonds. There are many more gemstones that are rarer and should be valued more by consumers but everyone wants a diamond ring because of the social convention of it.
@treblemaker33
@treblemaker33 2 жыл бұрын
Yep! That’s why I asked for moissanite :)
@polargirl1973
@polargirl1973 2 жыл бұрын
My first engagement ring was a blue sapphire. My second was an amethyst. Colored stones will always draw my eye. Oddly enough I have a good number of diamond rings that I inherited and don’t wear. I will pass those on to my kid.
@elenakalliste
@elenakalliste 2 жыл бұрын
So true! Very little intrinsic value. But gold on the other hand, that’s really the resale value of jewelry.
@jennzuriel32
@jennzuriel32 2 жыл бұрын
@@treblemaker33 same!
@gumshake689
@gumshake689 2 жыл бұрын
diamonds are rare though, usually there at y:12
@DrBecky
@DrBecky 2 жыл бұрын
Just to throw a spanner in the works, are logos not art in themselves? Graphic designers work incredibly hard to produce a logo that is recognisable and aesthetically pleasing. I feel like I had to say that with a graphic designer as a sister 😅
@jaygreene2257
@jaygreene2257 2 жыл бұрын
I think that’s a great point-see the podcast where they discuss losing money on knockoff Holo Taco merch.
@albertehall4192
@albertehall4192 2 жыл бұрын
In general, the purpose of buying a branded t-shirt, or anything alike, is not to showcase the 'artwork' of the logo but rather what the logo means. As Cristine mentioned the purpose of buying that t-shirt is to gain social capital through people knowing that you spent (and can afford to spend) a lot of money on it - hence the logo and aesthetic of the logo in itself is meaningless in this situation. And by that I am in no way trying to classify the work of a graphic designer as meaningless, it is extremely useful for businesses such as coffee shops, tech companies, etc. to have a well-designed, recognizable logo. But selling/buying a t-shirt where the only purpose is to show that you, the consumer, can afford that brand just makes you a walking advertisement. And even worse, they are not even paying you to advertise for them, you are paying them...
@charlieg.804
@charlieg.804 2 жыл бұрын
I agree that the process of graphic design is definitely creative and artistic, and a logo on its own might be considered art (though that is subjective), but I feel like as soon as you start mass-producing it, you can’t compare it to original art pieces anymore. Yes the process of creating the logo could be considered art, but is the mass-printing really worth paying the premium a singular piece or commission gets?
@micheal2458
@micheal2458 2 жыл бұрын
The graphic designer is almost never someone in-house getting paid for all the proceeds of the logo use though =/
@linzbelle
@linzbelle 2 жыл бұрын
The use the same logo . The designer paid for the logo probby a looooong time ago for a couple hundred to thousands of dollars. Jeffree Star admitted one fired back at customer who dislike the stickers they got in the mystery boxes. He fired back saying he spent hundreds having someone drawing them.
@rosejustice
@rosejustice 2 жыл бұрын
Luxury items are different tiers for everyone. As someone who can afford some items (ie- LuluLemon) you might not see that as luxury while looking down on the Gucci tshirt. Someone who can’t afford LuluLemon can easily look at your choice as see that as wasteful. On the other hand, someone might purchase a luxury nail polish because that’s a brand they like at a price point that’s reasonable to them.
@LilithZephirus
@LilithZephirus 2 жыл бұрын
I remember the video Cristine did about her all night oats, and all the brands she had (oats, milk, powders, etc) are way to expensive for me, at least in my country. Luxury depends on your own economy.
@sonia613
@sonia613 2 жыл бұрын
I agree on your point but it’s also true that the production of something (e.g a sweater) can only cost so much. Even if you take the nicest raw materials and best manufacture etc, there’s no way a sweater can cost more than a certain amount of money to make. I think that’s her main point? Although you might not be able to afford it, if you see a 100$ sweater you might still think that it’s a believable price because of the materials, manufacture, wages and other costs that a cheaper brand might save on. But it’s just not believable (at least to me) when a sweater is marked at 1000$. If I look at the value chain I just don’t see where those costs fit in, other than a ridiculously high profit margin.
@katyb2793
@katyb2793 2 жыл бұрын
@@sonia613 agreed. This goes for so many things. I used to work in a florist, and let me tell you, it is NOT costing the florist what they're charging you. Including paying workers, rent, etc The same goes for wedding dresses. As someone who sews my own clothes, wedding dresses aren't something that can just be made for $100. Especially depending on the design. Lace and real silk are expensive. Poofy ballroom gowns use heaps of fabric. One metre of lace can start at $60USD and you might need 1 or 10 meters of it. Silk... don't even get me started.. And there's the design, hours and hours of construction, hand sewing, fittings etc etc. If I made my own wedding dress, didn't buy discount fabrics, and made a ballroom style with silk and lace, the materials would cost a minimum of $1,450 USD alone. But is $10,000 from a designer fair? Definitely not. The conclusion of my rant? ... grow your own flowers, and learn to sew / hire a wedding dress 😅
@sonia613
@sonia613 2 жыл бұрын
@@katyb2793 agreed or avoid when possible if you feel like you’re being ripped off. Of course some people are fine with being charged 10k for a wedding dress or whatever it costs for a bouquet of flowers, and that’s totally fine. But for those things you mentioned there are definitely other ways to get around them, as you said. You can also buy cheaper wedding dresses on some websites where they cost a couple of hundred bucks. I’d rather pay a friend who knows how to make a wedding dress, or find like an independent person who does it and support them/small businesses rather than big designers. Or worst case scenario rent it I guess.
@katyb2793
@katyb2793 2 жыл бұрын
@@sonia613 yup. The only thing I would say is avoid the couple of hundred dollar dresses if the workers are being grossly underpaid in bad working conditions. But not everyone can afford to do that, and that's fine.
@alinagoberman1827
@alinagoberman1827 2 жыл бұрын
What I find interesting is how high end brands like Hermès, were never about handbags, have turned into the hottest hand bag that every celeb totes. Hermès is a horse saddle company out of France. They no longer make saddles, because why do that when you can sell a handbag for the same price, which doesn’t require any saddle making skills. While I was saddle shopping I found many older Hermès saddles for sale. Still out there for $2-4k. Any high quality saddle these days is made in France, and they are made to fit the modern horse. Hermès saddles we’re made to fit skinny Thoroughbreds and Arabians, because that’s what horses looked like 100 years ago. They don’t fit a lot of “modern” horses (thanks inbreeding). I still see people trying to buy these saddles because of their high end name, without realizing how dumb that is. You can’t base a purchase or quality, or fit on price alone, and just because it’s quality doesn’t mean it’s worth it, or correct.
@quinevere
@quinevere 2 жыл бұрын
that's so interesting omg
@rainingmermaids
@rainingmermaids 2 жыл бұрын
It is! Thanks for adding to the discussion!
@stephp6761
@stephp6761 2 жыл бұрын
I'm not sure where you're based (I'm not in North America, so maybe it's not the case there), but Hermes does still produce saddles. They are also still very active in the equestrian area in France - they sponsor several major equestrian events there, most famously I think the Saut Hermes in the Grand Palais Éphémère (a jumping event)
@vin2164
@vin2164 2 жыл бұрын
The brand name makes a lot more sense now lol
@alinagoberman1827
@alinagoberman1827 2 жыл бұрын
@@stephp6761 they do still make saddles, however, they do not fit modern horses, their “wide” saddle is only 4 inches, which in most other saddle companies is the medium tree size; these saddles are narrow, and have always been narrow. Too narrow for anything that isn’t a skinny high withered horse. Of all of the high end saddles that come out of France- Butet, Voltaire, Prestige, Etc, which adapted to the bodies of the new modern horses, Hermès did not. They may still sponsor events, but they make better bags than they ever did saddles.
@elizabethm5962
@elizabethm5962 2 жыл бұрын
I worked at Coach. “Porters” as we called them would buy handbags in bulk and ship them back to China and sell them for thousands. Others would purchase one of each style to replicate them on the counterfeit market. It made up a huge amount of our business.
@VamLoveAndKisses
@VamLoveAndKisses 2 жыл бұрын
I was chatting to a friend who has teenage children recently. They are so desperate for designer clothes because if they don't wear expensive brands they get bullied at school. Apparently her 14 year old daughter begged for Yeezys for her birthday so my friend bought her a pair of £300 shoes which she wore once. Someone at school accused her of wearing fake Yeezys and she refused to wear them again. Yet my friend continues to buy her designer items just for clout and to fit in it school. This just baffles me! I was never bothered about brands as a teen or now, and the idea of being bullied because someone isn't wearing £100s worth of clothing just seems so strange to me.
@Janiz1998
@Janiz1998 2 жыл бұрын
And this is why the school system where I live is all uniforms. That eliminated this issue
@lexiel.8293
@lexiel.8293 2 жыл бұрын
@@Janiz1998 But it doesn’t tho bc kids will find something else to make fun of like the quality of your uniform, the color shirt u put under, scuffs on shoes, hair out of place, anything.
@cocoapuff_x
@cocoapuff_x 2 жыл бұрын
I go to 8th grade and ppl at my school geniunely don't care anymore so i feel bad for her daughter 😭
@recoil53
@recoil53 2 жыл бұрын
@@lexiel.8293 Look, in school kids will always find a reason to exclude and bully. But at least this is easier on the pocketbooks.
@calictii
@calictii 2 жыл бұрын
My parents were poor so growing up we never got anything that didn't come from a thrift shop.
@c0p.8
@c0p.8 2 жыл бұрын
If some people want to know more about Lululemon’s “controversial” reputation, I highly recommend watching iilluminaughtii’s video about the company :)
@KS-zl9cd
@KS-zl9cd 2 жыл бұрын
I just watched this video last week (KZfaq has been recommending her videos to me recently). It was truly eye-opening and very informative. I have heard of Lululemon and knew it was a popular brand, but I have never owned any of their clothing or known much about it. All of her videos are very well done and well researched.
@KS-zl9cd
@KS-zl9cd 2 жыл бұрын
To add, I will not ever be purchasing their clothing after seeing that video.
@alecoloxa
@alecoloxa 2 жыл бұрын
X 2
@c0p.8
@c0p.8 2 жыл бұрын
@@KS-zl9cd me neither. I don’t like their clothes anyway 😌
@MellaLicious
@MellaLicious 2 жыл бұрын
I felt so triggered with this episode
@ranniesd
@ranniesd 2 жыл бұрын
Cristine you should’ve let Ben finish bringing up the exploited workers that cheap fast fashion uses
@ClocksInMyPlace
@ClocksInMyPlace 2 жыл бұрын
More so, I was hoping for a recognition that all fast fashion and many expensive brands (whether fast or not) exploit their workers. It was made to sound like only cheap brands do that. A higher price does NOT equal better conditions for the manufacturers.
@SplashBeor
@SplashBeor 2 жыл бұрын
YES!! 👏🏼
@lennypach5969
@lennypach5969 2 жыл бұрын
Cristine: I don’t care for diamonds Ben: I’m a lucky guy Lmao 😂
@RentedFashion
@RentedFashion 2 жыл бұрын
I was a fan of Lululemon until I heard the owner Chip Wilson named the brand with so many L’s because he found it funny that Asians can’t pronounce it. I have stopped buying Lulu but I still have my pieces that originally bought and they have held up! And it’s been 10 years!
@amandae8181
@amandae8181 2 жыл бұрын
Lululemon is super sketch in general. They don't have the best history with larger sizes and employees talk about cult-like classes they were forced to take and stuff like that. I had some of their clothes that I bought secondhand, and I will fully admit that I'm not a sporty/yoga sort of person so I can't make a ton of comparisons, but it feels like there are a lot of similar high-end athleisure brands now that I can't imagine that there aren't comperable, less problematic places to spend your money.
@gsd715
@gsd715 2 жыл бұрын
He's left the company but still holds shares and makes money. He also said it was women's body types that caused issues with pilling where their things rubbed. Their art director last year promoted a t-shirt on Instagram from another person who released a shirt that said "bat fried rice" with a bat and Chinese takeout box on it, he was fired. Lululemon has a long history of issues as do many companies especially the more expensive companies. Chanel, Hourglass, etc. don't release inclusive shades because they don't want inclusive business, they want white women. Hourglass last year released a face palette with darker shades but they were shades already in their line and weren't at all dark enough for anyone past medium, it's gross. Every brand has issues but some are inexcusable and that's up to each person to decide. How a person spends their money and time is a very sensitive subject but it's an important subject to talk about.
@zhenye7402
@zhenye7402 2 жыл бұрын
Canada branch of Lululemon is slightly less sketch but the money you spend still goes to line the pockets of a racist, culty, sketchy dude.
@elysecatelyn6431
@elysecatelyn6431 2 жыл бұрын
Yea Lulu isn't a great company and pretty unethical too. I'm surprised they kinda just ent over that...haven't finished the podcast yet so maybe they do. But to call out cheaper companies using sweat shops and not looking into Lulu is kinda biased too.
@mesagoebel6931
@mesagoebel6931 2 жыл бұрын
I worked at Lululemon and it definitely had the best work culture out of any retail job I’ve had. And their clothes are clearly great quality. But there are a lot of alternatives out there (like the girlfriend collective) that have much better social and environmental impacts
@keltiowens5609
@keltiowens5609 2 жыл бұрын
I always tell people, “you are the average of your friend group.” Who you surround yourself with is so important and something we need to teach kids.
@BobCrochets
@BobCrochets 2 жыл бұрын
100% agreement to the statement made at 54:53! I have an expensive purse that saved up for and bought several years ago. I have used it EVERY DAY for 4+ years now and it has more than paid itself off. Previously I had been using purses that were less expensive (
@Janiz1998
@Janiz1998 2 жыл бұрын
I didn't comment, but as I have started watching a leather crafter on Twitch and seeing all the work she does for her wallets and purses, and she still charges a third of what a LV purse costs, and LV bags are not even leather. However, I have paid a lot of money for a dress and the difference was immediately apparent in how the dress fit me and the material. So, there is some times are reasons for designer things costing more.
@valeriavagapova
@valeriavagapova 2 жыл бұрын
LV bags are not leather??? WHAT
@kenzieaarons5609
@kenzieaarons5609 2 жыл бұрын
@@valeriavagapova the monogrammed canvas bags are canvas coated in plastic. Lots of people think they are leather, despite canvas being in the title. An example of this is their neverfull bag. They do have some leather bags, but everything with the “LV” print or the checkered print is canvas and plastic. Canvas is pretty cheap and plastic is one of the cheapest materials out there. They are super cheap to make and they sell it extremely high.
@judyh3707
@judyh3707 2 жыл бұрын
To an extent... At a certain point there is no question that you are paying far, far, far much more than just for better quality. On the other end you have junk like Shein thats dirt cheap and thats reflective of quality too
@Janiz1998
@Janiz1998 2 жыл бұрын
@@valeriavagapova yeah. I never cared but I found out about this because the leather crafter I watch repurposed an LV bag as a commission for someone and she took it apart and we realized it's mostly canvas. The borders and straps I think were the only leather parts
@lauraerwin471
@lauraerwin471 2 жыл бұрын
Same who’s that streamer
@SoVidushi
@SoVidushi 2 жыл бұрын
My older brother really likes buying stuff exclusively from expensive brands, so obviously I developed the opposite ideology and grew up looking down on flex culture and luxury brands and buying anything with a logo on it. However I've recently learnt that it's probably wiser to buy slightly expensive items that are guaranteed to be ethically produced and will last longer than buying cheap items from unreliable sellers.
@graciem5239
@graciem5239 2 жыл бұрын
Fun fact! Diamonds actually depreciate in value and quality over time. The whole “diamonds are forever” thing is fake. Diamonds turn back into graphite over time - which is where you get the salt and pepper diamonds that are now becoming more popular.
@catvetter7030
@catvetter7030 2 жыл бұрын
I'm not one for wearing brands overtly as well. But I love me a classic leather Coach purse. I have some loyalty to Coach because I remember going into one of their stores looking like death warmed over and they still treated me as if I had $1000 to spend there. I also like that I can wear the hell out of my purse for a couple of years and then send it in to be repaired so I'm not going out and buying lots of purses only to get a new one two months later.
@complainielainie
@complainielainie 2 жыл бұрын
I have two coach purses I’ve kept in dust covers for like ten years cuz I was afraid of ruining them 😅😅 did not know repair exists in any company tbh, I just assume they won’t
@baileygosline7171
@baileygosline7171 2 жыл бұрын
Great point! Coach will repair your bag and their bags come with a lifetime warranty which many brands at a similar price point do not. For example Michael Kors which has bags in a similar price range only has a year warranty.
@caitlinquinn79
@caitlinquinn79 2 жыл бұрын
Brands with warranty is a great point! You can't go into H&M and ask them to repair your t-shirt £5 etc The price of the original item might include maintenance for companies who do repairs
@puppypundit
@puppypundit 2 жыл бұрын
I watched a documentary on how Hermès scarves are produced by silk artists. I gained a better understanding of their value. $650 cotton T-Shirt? Non, merci.
@ArtistofScience
@ArtistofScience 2 жыл бұрын
Ben I would like you to consider that being ethical with your clothing purchases is very similar to choosing what content you watch and subscribe to. Cristine says she doesn't watch fashion hauls because she hates that culture, her not watching may have a small impact but it is directly impacting that channel's profits. When it comes to fashion the fact is that the companies are doing horrible things to the environment and people, but one way we can put pressure on them is by not purchasing from them. Definitely not the only way but still an important one. Personally, I think everyone has the responsibility to be ethical will their purchases regardless of their wealth. But I fully understand that having little wealth will handicap your ability to make more ethical purchases but as long as we all attempt to be conscious consumers and voters we can drive market change. Also to be clear no one should feel shame for having to purchase within their needs.
@MellaLicious
@MellaLicious 2 жыл бұрын
100% this
@KreeZafi
@KreeZafi Жыл бұрын
While I absolutely see where you're coming from, the thing is that those companies make such enormous profit from a ridiculously big customer base that you would need an INSANE amount of people to boycott them to actually put any pressure on them, and that's just not happening. Large fast fashion companies don't really give a shit because they're making bank anyway, even the ones that you see very frequent call-outs against. There are still SO many people buying from them that they can easily afford to not care about the naysayers. You'd need to get a very very significant amount of people to get on board with a boycott for it to actually put any pressure on the company, and realistically that won't happen. Which is why legislation is the only way to achieve real change, you'll never be able to make them willingly change their ways to appease customers, because they will never NEED to do so.
@BeesAndButtercups
@BeesAndButtercups 2 жыл бұрын
The majority of big name luxury brands nowadays are really just fast fashion with a higher price tag. The conditions down the supply chain are just as appalling as with a Zara or Forever21. Plus everything is owned by like the same 6 companies so even if one passes the ethics check the money still funnels to the bastards (looking at you LVMH)
@miuuhh5196
@miuuhh5196 2 жыл бұрын
16:48 comment for Cristine. For an example the brand calles Hermes and their Birkin and Kelly bags. These bags have no visible logo but their shape is so iconic that you know them if you are interest in luxury bags or just in luxury. And it is safe to say that most of handbag lovers would like to own a birkin or a kelly in their collection.
@MellaLicious
@MellaLicious 2 жыл бұрын
Part if the reason for their fame is that they were created exclusively for royalty by the fashion house, starting a furor in the public. Doesn’t mean you have to like it, but that’s why. Particularly Hermes, they hand craft each Birkin and you have to have a connection to even be considered to purchase one.
@zubebi
@zubebi 2 жыл бұрын
When I was growing up pre-cell phone, the thing I saw that made me think "they're rich" was when classmates had their own phone line in their room!
@lizalove91
@lizalove91 2 жыл бұрын
I agree about that commenter- what we see on the runways 100% is art and they’ve made a lot of history that way, but selling bland t shirts with a logo slapped on for $900 is ridiculous.
@sighcantthinkofaname
@sighcantthinkofaname 2 жыл бұрын
In general I think public perception about how much items are "suppose" to cost get really twised. It's like if it's designer it can cost whatever they charge, but if it's not then it should be dirt cheap. I'm a knitter, and sometimes people on the different forums will put in requests for custom comissions. It's always fun when the person making the request makes a comment about it being over-priced, because they are instantly hated by all knitters. I even saw someone once say they might as well buy a gucci suit for the prices they wre being quoted. To be clear no one has an issue when someone politely says it's out of their budget at the moment. It doesn't hurt to ask. But if I'm spending $100 on yarn for a project and working on it for 20+ hours, of course I'm not selling it for $60. That would be insane. The argument there is if that's all people are willing to pay for it that's what it's worth, but I disagree with that. I don't know anyone who would pay $5 for a submarine, that doesn't mean submarines are worthless. For the record here I never have and probably never will sell anything I knit, and not just because people won't pay for it. But I know people I think this is part of why it's so hard for brands that are actually trying to be sustainable. People are so use to seeing the dirt cheap prices that they're floored by what fair labor costs.
@allison3706
@allison3706 2 жыл бұрын
Seconded. I'm a crocheter and, on average, the yarn to make a scarf costs about $10 and takes me 8 hours to complete. But if I list for more than $25, no one will buy it. Even though I'm using higher quality yarn and more intricate stitches. It's frustrating.
@riotgrrrl8807
@riotgrrrl8807 Жыл бұрын
Of course, the pieces you create are more like luxury items and not necessities. But I don't think it's fair to blame people for not having hundreds to spare and still wanting nice things. The cost to just LIVE is so high through rent, food and medical bills. It isn't always stinginess that is responsible for people preferring cheaper products.
@Mrs_whynot232
@Mrs_whynot232 2 жыл бұрын
In regards to the profit margin question, knowing the profit margin for one item won’t give you the full picture. For example, restaurants have a smaller profit margin on food than they have on drinks because food cost more to make than beverages. So, knowing the profit margin for one item doesn’t give you the full picture of that company.
@toltorg
@toltorg 2 жыл бұрын
I live in Australia and work overnights and this podcast is always timed perfectly for me to listen to at work. Appreciate y’all always. 👏🏻
@mossyminou
@mossyminou 2 жыл бұрын
y’all NEED to read the essay “avant-garde and kitsch” by clement greenberg
@horsecrazi57
@horsecrazi57 2 жыл бұрын
I do own a few luxury goods. For my wedding dress years ago, I bought a D&G dress that was on sale from the previous season. I spent much less than a typical wedding dress and it is an incredibly unique pattern. I’ve worn it multiple times since. I also have a pair of shoes that are my “dress shoes” for any fancy night out. HOWEVER I prefer to shop handmade goods (off of Etsy or through searching tags through Instagram) and my personal style is not designer inspired. Comfort and supporting small business is way more important to me as I’ve grown in the past few years! Edit: I also do NOT buy heavily logo’d anything unless it’s in support of small business (coffee shops mostly).
@laurah9221
@laurah9221 2 жыл бұрын
Even as a teenager I completely agree with what they're saying in this podcast it all makes so much sense.
@cocoa1620
@cocoa1620 2 жыл бұрын
Don’t say “even as a teenager” your opinion is equally important.
@treblemaker33
@treblemaker33 2 жыл бұрын
I think the sweet spot is one level above their viewership. While Simply makes more than one level above me income-wise, I consider her very relatable in terms of values and education. She inspires me to work hard and maybe improve my lifestyle a bit in terms of things I value. Influencers are who are super super rich aren’t relatable to me and I don’t think they’re a good influence on young kids.
@taraa4281
@taraa4281 2 жыл бұрын
I appreciate how little you care about brands! I just wanna add that maybe you could look into athletic brands that operate more ethically than for example lululemon that are using uyghur forced labour materials. like not to be presumptuous but I feel like you may be able to afford brands like girlfriend collective or AVOCADO, and you are the exact person I think that is able to support brands like that :)
@mytasteinmusicisyourface3020
@mytasteinmusicisyourface3020 2 жыл бұрын
These come out at 10 am for me and they really help me get up out of bed and take care of myself on days where its hard, thanks simply and beyyyyyn
@karolinacamargo6870
@karolinacamargo6870 2 жыл бұрын
Even as I’m biased, I never understood this need for brands, my BFF prefers to eat poorly (just rice) & live with no conforts (good bed) to buy this ítems, we all put value in different things, I spent my money on good wine & food & books so we all are crazy in different ways.
@recoil53
@recoil53 2 жыл бұрын
I'm with you on this.
@roseobsydian
@roseobsydian 2 жыл бұрын
To your comment on “excessive influencer hauls” I think a person who is doing it right is PrettyPastelPlease. She does hauls in order to give people a product review, a better understanding of a product that her viewers want to purchase for themselves. Then in turn she was able to sell the clothes to donate thousands of dollars to help out her home country battle forest fires. What I’m trying to say is as a consumer, I like hauls because if I am thinking of buying something from a site then I can watch a review and know that the item is crap without wasting my own money.
@micivalantincic8227
@micivalantincic8227 2 жыл бұрын
The bird stays!
@becamitchels
@becamitchels 2 жыл бұрын
About what Ben said around 17:00, that reminds me of something I saw on tiktok. Someone talked about Jay-Z and how he wore extra bling bling everywhere he could in the beginning of his career even tho he probably couldn’t really afford it (and maybe designer clothes with logos too, can’t remember) and now where he is rich AF he doesn’t do that anymore. Of course he wears expensive suits and stuff but not where the brand is slapped on it. And the bling got way less as well. He’s got the decent richness 🤣
@TheCoolCookieKitchen
@TheCoolCookieKitchen 2 жыл бұрын
I feel the same way Cristine feels about her sweaters when it comes to my handbags. It is a name brand but it's made of real leather it has a higher price tag but it lasts me anywhere from 10 to 15 years rather than 10 to 15 months where it then ends up in the landfill and I have to reinvest in another handbag.
@ivyk5796
@ivyk5796 2 жыл бұрын
When I just started high school I thought the other kids would like me if I got the same brands as them. So I got the same brands. They still thought I was weird. lesson learned. Now I just buy what I like if it has a brand tag and I like it I might spend the money on it☺️
@Nemishysteria
@Nemishysteria 2 жыл бұрын
My issue with most luxury brands is that the products they produce are just ugly. Obviously taste is subjective but even if I had millions of dollars to spare, I still wouldn't buy most luxury stuff simply because I find it ugly and distasteful. And I honestly believe that a lot of luxury things are objectively not that attractive but most people think it's beautiful simply because it's made by a luxury brand. Obviously taste is subjective but there are trends and there are certain things that the majority of people will like and other things the majority of people will dislike, but I think luxury brands get away with making something most people would dislike, slapping their name on it, and suddenly everyone wants it.
@alicialimon9103
@alicialimon9103 2 жыл бұрын
I agree! So many luxury purses and clothes are just .. a t shirt with the brand logo printed on it over and over. I just don’t find those cute? So I totally feel this
@charlie41148
@charlie41148 2 жыл бұрын
i'm an artist (as in painting and sculpting) and I personally hate the argument that the prices of luxury items are justified because they are art. A design in itself can be art but I feel like the second something is mass pruduced it loses the integrity of an art peice an can no longer be consided art. I think a good example is art prints, art prints can be worth a decent price if there are only a limited amount made but for the most part they are inexpensive because they are not art, they are mass produced replicas/photos/copies of an original piece and therefor have a low value. And I feel like the same can be said for any masspruduced items, the design in itself may be a priceless artistic masterpeice but when that design is being masspruduced that value is lost.
@maybeeeyo
@maybeeeyo 2 жыл бұрын
Some lululemon products are sown here in my city (Cebu, Philippines) and let me tell you, the people sewing the leggings, are NOT paid a livable wage.
@alekhyanarayanam4670
@alekhyanarayanam4670 2 жыл бұрын
I'm 20 seconds into the podcast and my fisrt reaction was, "What is going on with Beeeyyynn's hair??!?" 😂😂😂
@lienepoetje
@lienepoetje 2 жыл бұрын
I believe that the mass production of an artpiece does not make it less "art", like less artistic value, but it does make it less economically valuable.
@Cosmi_Kat
@Cosmi_Kat 2 жыл бұрын
This was really interesting to watch after ContraPoints Envy video.
@nevergonnagiveyouupnevergo9439
@nevergonnagiveyouupnevergo9439 2 жыл бұрын
Cristine in her ✨ influencerz✨ fit
@taramalloy6550
@taramalloy6550 2 жыл бұрын
every time i hear someone talk about their high school experience (mean girls, status symbols, who's "cool" vs not, etc) i always wonder if my high school experience was really that different or if I was just oblivious to everything happening around me lol
@_bebeboudeur_
@_bebeboudeur_ 2 жыл бұрын
I feel like the popular stuff was before high school to me, between 12yo and 16yo it was the bullies time
@TT-_-
@TT-_- 2 жыл бұрын
LOL, lower high school (ages 13-16) in Finland around 2010 we had: *Baddies/popular kids;* smoking, cursing, wearing black +black hair +eyeliner etc, hates school. *Mid-popular/normal kids;* skinny jeans (straight leg for boys), hoodies, foundation and mascara, does alright academically. *Nerds/unpopular kids;* less makeup, clothes fashionable a few years ago, does 'too well' academically. *Outcasts;* learning difficulties or speech impediments etc, clothes totally out of fashion, no make-up, unpopular interests like anime. That american ideal where the most popular kids are sporty, beautiful and academically at least average was so not a thing back then😂 'Finland - Country of Metal music' was very visible in the fashion of the 'cool' crowd. For last 'mandatory' education years (16-19yo) the crowd split pretty directly 'baddies+outcasts' to vocational school and 'normies+nerds' to upper high school.
@lindseybotelho
@lindseybotelho 2 жыл бұрын
I watched a documentary about Tommy Hilfiger and they talked a bit about the transition in the 90s of brands supersizing their logos and over branding most of their products and how it actually saved the Tommy Hilfiger brand. He said it was like thousands of walking billboards. He said that he was the one responsible for starting that trend.
@lindabodewes7824
@lindabodewes7824 2 жыл бұрын
As a consumer I value outerwear and foot wear. I’m willing to invest in quality and I’m unconcerned about what the brand is. It’s how it serves me. I also have a $100 per season rule. For every $100 I spend on an item it needs to serve me well for that number of seasons.
@nectarina3891
@nectarina3891 2 жыл бұрын
this is a great rule. although I usually get 3-4 years out of shoes that cost ~$200.
@caitlinquinn79
@caitlinquinn79 2 жыл бұрын
Do you mean you aim to get 100 seasons out of it? Or 1 season per $100? This might be really obvious but I struggle with understanding numbers!
@lindabodewes7824
@lindabodewes7824 2 жыл бұрын
@@caitlinquinn79 the second. So 1 season per $100.
@DDepaolis
@DDepaolis 2 жыл бұрын
Re: Price of Art… I recommend checking out the MOMA video that talks about Marcel Duchamp and his “Readymades”. (“Bicycle Wheel” and “Fountain” are 2 famous pieces). Long story short - he argued that art was all about the artist’s intention… Which is why these pieces were made from items he bought / found. Today, they are in museums and worth millions. It’s a really interesting perspective on how ephemeral the whole concept of “value” is… Anyway - LOVE the podcast! So great to hear interesting and thoughtful commentary… It was so good - I ended up buying my 1st Holo Taco during the 2nd anniversary launch..
@LemonCrush72
@LemonCrush72 2 жыл бұрын
7:28 it's one thing to like their clothing, but... Lululemon doesn't have a good history.
@loreh.4127
@loreh.4127 2 жыл бұрын
You are right, I remember when I want your nail polish when it first came out and my mom said no because of my grades in school but after two years finally got my first polishes of the Electric collection and so happy about it because I show that I deserve the polishes and I’m happy because of that and the way they are raising me.😄
@xBloodGarnetx
@xBloodGarnetx 2 жыл бұрын
I think it is so important to remember that just because you are paying bank for an item that is no guarantee that item is sweatshop free, iirc Nike have always made pretty expensive sneakers, they weren't cheap just because kids were making them. It's true that at a certain price point you can be pretty sure that it won't have been made in the best conditions for the best pay, but often expensive and branded clothing is found in the same collapsed or burnt out sweatshops as Walmart clothes. Just because you paid more does not mean the workers in the production chain were paid more.
@recoil53
@recoil53 2 жыл бұрын
Yeah, as a luxury brand they don't have to pass the savings on to you, because people expect to pay more for a luxury brand. It's just a way to make even more money.
@urturningviolet
@urturningviolet 2 жыл бұрын
As someone who has worked in the jewelry industry for almost ten years, I can say that a Tiffany piece does always have more value if you want to sell it later. I think that this example specifically is true because Tiffany is a guarantee of a certain level of quality but it is also about what it says to have that name on something that you own. The biggest reason though (in my opinion) is what it says to be able to give something Tiffany rather than just owning something Tiffany if that makes sense.
@expensivepink7
@expensivepink7 2 жыл бұрын
omg so excited for this topic!! love you guys thank you for such a consistent pod!!!
@johndododoe1411
@johndododoe1411 2 жыл бұрын
Don't confuse the original art that founded a fashion brand with the art they commission to preserve the reputation long after the original artist (such as Mr. Gucci) are dead. In 70 years, Holo Taco will not be based on the quality enforced by Cristine, but on some distant echo of what was in her current marketing. Because Cristine will be over 100 years old or dead.
@KF-tq2df
@KF-tq2df 2 жыл бұрын
Have to say this podcast makes me feel like all those hours studying A-level sociology terms was worth it just so I can understand the occasional big word that they throw out 😂😂
@caorlimoes
@caorlimoes 2 жыл бұрын
funny how ben's discourse about the original campbells print vs multiple copies is something we often discuss in university as an art major! there's some realll good texts written by walter benjamin about this exact same subject i can't reccomend it enough!
@ElenaEnchanted
@ElenaEnchanted 2 жыл бұрын
I love fashion, and I love finding clothes made of good quality and luxury materials. Usually "higher" or "designer" brands are the ones who are creating pieces with such fabric. But I under no circumstances purchase anything at its retail value. Thrift stores and second hand is my go-to. So I definitely have Prada and Jimmy Choo shoes and bags which I paid 1/10 of the price for because I know their quality is good and will last long.
@hannahbanana8073
@hannahbanana8073 2 жыл бұрын
Now I'm super curious about the type of pigment in the unicorn pee polish and why they dont use it anymore.
@johndododoe1411
@johndododoe1411 2 жыл бұрын
Probably something unethically sourced from whales, just like actual unicorn horns.
@M3ynna
@M3ynna 2 жыл бұрын
Same!!! I have read somewhere that it can't be made without some harmful chemicals (one or several of the big 3 of nail polish), but i don't know.
@nightvisitor6079
@nightvisitor6079 2 жыл бұрын
One of those luxury things that I consider(ed) worth buying from well known brands are perfumes. Crafting perfumes still is an artistic manual craft to me, although I know that you can buy cheap stuff that is mass produced. But with expensive perfumes I always feel like you definitely know that it is a well hand-crafted product you're getting. My perfume interests have mostly changed by now but I don't refuse the high end ones completely. Whereas with fashion, I don't care much for high end fashion - especially the brand-slapped t-shirts, etc. ... Some high end make up doesn't perform well either... I do have to disagree with Ben a little bit about the ethical aspect. While it is true of course that big cooperations and businesses are vastly responsible for pollution and exploitation, there should still be discussion about the individual level of consumption. 15 years ago we only a had a handful of vocal people saying: Look, these things are not ok and harmful to people and the planet, and many people didn't really pay attention to what charity organisations like WWF were doing. But more and more people started talking about ethical consumption and pointed out the things individual consumers can do to help the good cause. It's always about money, we could have had legislation and regulation for businesses a lot earlier, because all the wrong-doings were known, but no one cared. What they (businesses and politics) care about is profit. During those last 15 years the debate has been growing constantly and because consumers demand more ethically produced goods and started questioning the businesses' ways for the first time, things are finally changing. The businesses are forced to rethink some strategies, so that they don't lose their customers. That has also led to things like 'green washing' but that is a whole new topic. My point is - even didn't have people pointing out to other people that there is a more ethical/reasonable alternative to something (like plastic), we wouldn't see any change, and at the end of the day, we as consumers decide with every purchase what is in demand and what is in supply. This is will be quicker than waiting for politicians to advocate for and install new legislation. EDIT: If anyone is interested in the fashion industry and things like green washing, I recommend the youtube channel of Justine Leconte!
@riotgrrrl8807
@riotgrrrl8807 Жыл бұрын
True, but a normal person can never keep up with all the time the new tricks and deceptions companies come up with to pretend they're ethical. How would a single consumer ever verify if the claims a company makes about their production chain are true? That's a bit much to ask. The only thing you can reliably do is by less in general and by used stuff. But then it's on the government to not compensate for your boycott through subsidies. The only thing that could really save the environment in the short term are strict rules for companies created by actual experts and properly enforced by the government. But in the long term the profit motive, aka capitalism, needs to be abolished.
@brotha444
@brotha444 2 жыл бұрын
As a Visual Arts major, I can tell you that art and art collecting is a whole other avenue in this topic that you guys need to research on. Not to sound condescending in any way, it’s just a huge topic in itself that would need it’s own episode because it’s really interesting in itself. Art that belongs to the great names such as Andy Warhol and Picasso, as you’ve mentioned, will always appreciate in value due to the artist being dead. There will never be any more original pieces made under their name so their pieces will always have insane value. And sometimes the value is justified because of that fact.
@johndododoe1411
@johndododoe1411 2 жыл бұрын
I grew up with original art that was purchased from young artists when my family members were equally young. Some grew into fame, some didn't, and we used to talk about who they were and how their styles changed later in their careers.
@MellaLicious
@MellaLicious 2 жыл бұрын
And many fashion houses are artistic and begin fashion trends-as conglomerate as they are.
@twinklej5459
@twinklej5459 2 жыл бұрын
I actually want another episode of the same topic because it has been soooo good to hear your thoughts which have triggered my own chain of beliefs! Love your podcast Cristine and Ben!❤️💙
@TrishaSpectacle
@TrishaSpectacle 2 жыл бұрын
Before watching comment: for me i see wearing “ready to wear” designer clothing as financially supporting the art of runway/avante garde fashion. You watch a gucci runway and the clothing the models are wearing are absolutely more elevated than what you see in the stores-and often do cost a LOT of money to conceptualize, construct, style, etc. not to mention the cost of a runway and paying the models. I PERSONALLY view “buying a plain tshirt with a logo” as being like… showing that i like this designers style and that i want to support their art to see it continue to bring new ideas and concepts. Similar to buying a band tshirt. This is not to say that i personally do this but i think it’s an interesting alternative perspective. I also know that there are probably not a whole lot of people who actually view it this way and probably most are doing it as a status symbol. Also the price difference in value for a Gucci shirt versus a band shirt is definitely different as well so something else to kind of keep in mind. But just wanted to provide an alternate perspective to the convo! :)
@GallifrAngel
@GallifrAngel 2 жыл бұрын
That is such an interesting perspective that I would never have thought of! Comparing it to wearing a band t-shirt definitely helps conceptualize for me the idea behind it that some people could have. Reminds me a little of the episode of Friends where Joey wears all the Ferrari clothes so people think he owns a Ferrari lol
@cholec9230
@cholec9230 2 жыл бұрын
boost!!!!
@huginnandmuninn4865
@huginnandmuninn4865 2 жыл бұрын
The only place where quality meet the price even if the price is inflated by the name of a luxury brand, is leather working, usually the products will be more long lasting than a fast fashion one
@noellieraviollie748
@noellieraviollie748 2 жыл бұрын
I’ve always felt this way about luxury and designer brands and I’m really happy to see someone talk about it. While you were talking about the cool kids in high school I remembered going to a graduation party a year after I graduated myself and a boy that was at the party took my Galaxy phone out of my hand, scoffed at me and said “oh my god you don’t have an IPhone??” And then proceeded to not talk to me for the rest of the night. This was like three years ago and I’m still in shock that some people actually think this way and only want to be a part of social circles if money and social capital are involved.
@JoshuaHenelyThornhill
@JoshuaHenelyThornhill 2 жыл бұрын
this podcast just hits all the right points i just love yall both
@craft-menace
@craft-menace 2 жыл бұрын
It seems like there is a difference between incredible expensive unattainable luxury and affordable luxuries that you might treat yourself with, or because the item holds up better.
@rosalindaperez246
@rosalindaperez246 2 жыл бұрын
As a former retail manager for 13+ years and at three very different levels of monetary value items, this podcast is very intriguing to me. Selling $2000 dress shirts to $10 dress pants and being a consumer myself I'm always interested in the psychological aspect of consumerism. Simplypodlogical always putting my brain to work 🧠 🤔🤔
@SuperSymo
@SuperSymo 2 жыл бұрын
I used to work in a store that sold a lot of different brands and I can tell you, the difference in quality is unreal. Some brands make cheap crap that would fall apart before a customer would even get a chance to buy it. But other brands really put a lot of effort into the quality of the item.
@Emotochan3
@Emotochan3 2 жыл бұрын
One perspective I didn’t think of before until I got older was that my mom actually wished she could give me some of those nice luxury things growing up because she didn’t get them. She took pride in working up to her status of financial success (not that it was significant or high) and then being able to bless me with some of it even if I didn’t want those designer jeans all my friends had. That was an enlightening viewpoint I realized when I thought those objects were just a waste of money. Although I didn’t value them, I respected and appreciated my moms desire to get them for me at times because of her feeling that her hard work had paid off. Of course it was a balance because I definitely was not as well off as my peers, and I still feel like I was raised with a great work ethic and passion to give back because of her.
@lix2406
@lix2406 2 жыл бұрын
I wonder how many eps it will take for Cristine to finally be in sync w the intro 😂
@louiseglasgow
@louiseglasgow 2 жыл бұрын
Bit of a random thought, but has anyone else noticed that men's t-shirts seem to last longer than women's t-shirts from the same shop (and are cheaper!). Is that a supply and demand thing? Like men don't like shopping as much (statistically), but women (again statistically) want the latest fashion, so they can get away with selling us thinner materials that don't last as long, whereas men will shop whereever will sell them something that means they don't need to go shopping for a long time? Or is it simply that women/fashion designers like thinner fabrics because they "cling"/reveal more!? It's been bugging me since I realised.
@adrianahenrichs359
@adrianahenrichs359 2 жыл бұрын
This conversation reminded me a bit about the doll reseller market. When people decide a doll is valuable (whether it be based in reality or not) the prices on the secondhand market skyrocket. Of course there are genuinely rare dolls whether that be because of when they were manufactured, how many were produced, or a variant of some kind. But sometimes you just see a play line doll that was originally $20 new from the shelf being sold for upwards of $200+ and you just have to question how it got to that price and if that price is worth it for you. I buy a lot of my dolls secondhand and I try to keep it in a reasonable range which limits my collection somewhat. But I’d much rather go on thrift store doll hunts and scroll through thousands of online listings to buy dolls at a lower price than the premiums on Mercari.
@SP-po7ni
@SP-po7ni 2 жыл бұрын
Been waiting for this all week!!! Holo 🌮 Tuesday has finally arrived!!
@londonmellow
@londonmellow 2 жыл бұрын
i read it as ben and i was like, why did ben wait for this all week? 😂
@bella1rules
@bella1rules 2 жыл бұрын
My mom didn’t let me out of the house in sweatpants in hs or at any age lol she still can’t believe people go out in public in pajama pants
@jacklyntree7752
@jacklyntree7752 2 жыл бұрын
Then your mom probably hates me 😅
@pleasestopscreaming
@pleasestopscreaming 2 жыл бұрын
Honestly same, that and "athleisure." Just goes to show how trends change.
@johndododoe1411
@johndododoe1411 2 жыл бұрын
@@pleasestopscreaming Sweatpants are comfy athletics wear, and are now harder to find because actual athletics brands have shifted to less comfortable materials that only make sense when actually doing athletics / sports with a lot of sweating.
@fuzzybeatle
@fuzzybeatle 2 жыл бұрын
Hey you guys answered my question!! Fiji water IS expensive Ben
@jubirebas6779
@jubirebas6779 2 жыл бұрын
I feel like a lot of the conversation in this pod is based on luxury CLOTHING and accessories. I work for a luxury brand, and the product we sell is considered so because of the technology behind it, not just the "branding". I understand how clothing and clothing accessories are the most accessible to the general public, so easier to talk about, but there is a lot of thought and effort out into most luxury goods, despite not being hand manufactured
@anamaria.condurache31
@anamaria.condurache31 2 жыл бұрын
You guys are the best! 💛
@nancyfriessen9642
@nancyfriessen9642 2 жыл бұрын
Was raised on hand me downs and buying "new" items from thrift stores. Noone ever realized or made fun of me. Dont see the point in wasting money on brand new when there's so many clothes out there already
@nectarina3891
@nectarina3891 2 жыл бұрын
Gucci makes some beautiful floral silk scarves. If I had higher income I would absuloutely pay $500 dollars for some of those. no one else makes scarf designs I like as much.
@recoil53
@recoil53 2 жыл бұрын
But if somebody else made silk scarves with patterns you like for less, would the brand matter to you?
@nectarina3891
@nectarina3891 2 жыл бұрын
@@recoil53 nope, that was my point. they do have some pruducts that are unique and may be worth the price, but the brand alone does not merit it
@lindazhang894
@lindazhang894 2 жыл бұрын
There are specific prints and motifs that are exclusive to Gucci and related to the history of the brand, so you're not likely to find a dupe elsewhere. IMO high quality luxury silk scarves are one of the better investments. You can wear them in a million ways, generally easy to care for, and they last forever. Great items to hand down as family heirlooms. I have an Hermes scarf from my grandma that's framed in my office.
@cupcakewithouttheicing
@cupcakewithouttheicing 2 жыл бұрын
What you spoke about the middle classes trying to project something they aspire to have is something that definitely happens. I studied something similar that occurs in Linguistics, where speakers belonging to what can be considered the middle class are more likely to emulate the way they believe the upper class speaks (for example, with formal language) to an even higher extent than the upper class uses in reality
@thenopedetective
@thenopedetective 2 жыл бұрын
Woo those captions! Love it
@Writergirl716
@Writergirl716 2 жыл бұрын
I think you missed a huge opportunity to talk about how luxury brands only have specific sizing too. Heavy girls like myself can't wear Gucci even if we can afford it, because they deliberately are not size inclusive. Just like Hollister saying, "we don't want ugly people wearing our brand, so we don't carry plus sizes." [I'm paraphrasing] Luxury brands purposefully exclude people they want to alienate. It's gross.
@collyflower6623
@collyflower6623 2 жыл бұрын
Love this point!
@kat_kami
@kat_kami 2 жыл бұрын
Do Hollister really said that (in other words)?
@Writergirl716
@Writergirl716 2 жыл бұрын
@@kat_kami yes, back in like, 2011/2012 ish
@kat_kami
@kat_kami 2 жыл бұрын
@@Writergirl716 wow, didn't know that, I'm going to look into it, thanks!
@jaash7981
@jaash7981 2 жыл бұрын
The only time I drop a lot of money on clothes is A. I'm supporting my favorite creators or B. I know the company is ethical and makes higher quality clothing
@corsivapurpleus
@corsivapurpleus 2 жыл бұрын
I work with some of these brands (not all) on a daily basis at my job. I was never really into luxury brands before but after working with some brands, I can say with confidence that I will never be giving them my business ever. The culture within some of these luxury brands is incredibly entitled and they seem to think that they can get anything they want on any deadline. It doesn't matter how unrealistic this is on my end, they don't want to hear it. I have had to work 14 hour days just waiting around for them but when I need a few more hours to finish something that was unreasonable in the first place, it's horrifying. And yes, they are paying us to do work for them. But the number of times experiences like this occur with non-luxury brands is minuscule compared to luxury brands. Most clients are understanding of the process or our resources but this is not often the case with many luxury brands. My theory is they know that they bring in a lot of revenue for the company I work at and we have to keep them happy in order to prevent them walking. However, I think that they could be a lot more understanding that money does not fix every problem and there is only so much we can do. They are so frustrating to work with and for this reason (along with my original reasons) I will not be giving any of them my money.
@marybeth808
@marybeth808 2 жыл бұрын
Just now seeing this episode and I can contribute to the convo a little bit! Back in the early 2010s, I was interested in the Gucci purse collections, specifically some of the silhouettes that were out at the time. When I started making money, I purchased a few. Most are plain black, without super obvious branding, but clearly a Gucci purse if you’re into it. I’d get comments every now and then but I really just loved the simplicity and the craftsmanship. One bag in particular, I take on all my trips, loaded down heavy, which would break any other bag. I dragged it up and down Bourbon Street and through smoky vegas casinos many times. It got cigarette burns, tequila spilled into it, someone even tried to steal it off my arm and we had a tug of war with the handles! To this day, this is still my “work horse” bag. It has required zero structural repairs, but because of the amazing warranty that comes with a high-end Gucci bag, I’ve been able to take it in for cleanings for no charge. The gorgeous hardware is shiny, untarnished and not even badly scuffed, considering what it’s been through, and I maintain that this bag has saved me money in the long run, because it shows zero signs of breaking down. $2500 well spent, and I’m going to gift it as a vintage party bag in a couple/few decades when I’m done with it.
Guess the Price - SimplyPodLogical #76
54:09
SimplyPodLogical
Рет қаралды 163 М.
Am I the A**hole 7 (Birthday Edition) - SimplyPodLogical #82
1:09:25
SimplyPodLogical
Рет қаралды 403 М.
Дибала против вратаря Легенды
00:33
Mr. Oleynik
Рет қаралды 3,9 МЛН
Luck Decides My Future Again 🍀🍀🍀 #katebrush #shorts
00:19
Kate Brush
Рет қаралды 8 МЛН
Tom & Jerry !! 😂😂
00:59
Tibo InShape
Рет қаралды 57 МЛН
Must-have gadget for every toilet! 🤩 #gadget
00:27
GiGaZoom
Рет қаралды 11 МЛН
What's In Simply Nailogical's Inbox? - SimplyPodLogical #64
1:11:19
SimplyPodLogical
Рет қаралды 325 М.
Gen Z vs. Millennials - SimplyPodLogical #61
57:23
SimplyPodLogical
Рет қаралды 345 М.
Pitching YouTube Originals Show Ideas - SimplyPodLogical #68
48:51
SimplyPodLogical
Рет қаралды 145 М.
$500 Gucci Luxury Nail Polish Haul Review🤑
14:44
Simply Nailogical
Рет қаралды 2,7 МЛН
Ghost Stories - Session 12 ft. @Cyril D'Abs Suresh & Cyrus
2:49:22
Unpopular Opinions - SimplyPodLogical #58
1:02:26
SimplyPodLogical
Рет қаралды 464 М.
How Designer Brands Keep You Poor
18:59
Cara Nicole
Рет қаралды 2 МЛН
Leggings, Pyramid Schemes & MLM's - SimplyPodLogical #79
49:48
SimplyPodLogical
Рет қаралды 283 М.
Am I The A**hole? 5 - SimplyPodLogical #71
1:02:09
SimplyPodLogical
Рет қаралды 341 М.
Дибала против вратаря Легенды
00:33
Mr. Oleynik
Рет қаралды 3,9 МЛН