Sony xz, xz premium phone from 2017 can record that speed

It's not the same. A phone recording 1000 fps through its extremely tiny sensor cannot compete.

@@Tbird761 Modern CPUs can use the data from those small sensors much better and the sensors themselves got much more effective too so honestly (although what we see here on the video must be a very compressed image)

Yeah made me laugh about the miniature inside camera. GoPro 😀😀😀

wait what-

@@daniidelrey 90s Audi 100 haha

@@daniidelrey beeecause racecarr

Well that’s just stupid

@@Ali_zokari How is it stupid? You're aware airbags have become mandatory only recently, right?

That Rover is from somewhere around pre 2000, that's somewhere between 20-25 years old.

@@joyrider6456 Uhm... So? It was still only 10years old when they tested this🙈😅 It's a old episode....

@@joyrider6456 It's a P-reg, so it's from 1996 or early '97.

@@Oystein87 because 30 years before that episode cars didnt had airbags except some models. If the episode is from, lets say, 2006, almost no cars from 1976 had airbags Edit: this episode was from 2005.

@@juancitobentos6351 Read my comment again.....🙂

Does that mean 600 drivers never wear their seat belt?

Honda?!! If you don't get that bullshit outta here the airbags on their cars are defective as shit

@@MILSIM_luke_e not if you got them recalled?

The Rover 600 in the video is based on a Honda Accord but a 90s one, with the car in the video being from 1996.

Given the fact it wasn't full of ammonium nitrate.

If it was, steve would have hit his head on the fuckin weel

@@MILSIM_luke_e Look at the video again, he didn't even touch airbag with his face. Dude just tensed up so much, that he absorbed impact with his muscles.

If the label says "SRS AIRBAG" it was manufactured by SRS

​@@TeimonKauppa739every car says "srs" that means Supplemental Restraint System, its not a brand

It’s calculated risk, so much of his reaction would have been done for the camera. The consequences he was describing of the floor pan distending to the point where his feet are trapped under the steering column and the leg injuries and hip injuries are only in the Pandora’s box that a collision at a higher speed would open.

Had a crash in a 25yr old Nissan Maxima at around 50-60mph, a side crash, airbags worked perfectly and i didnt have a bruise, except for a slight burn on the wrist due to the airbag deployment

@@domagojjurendic8768 good to know i hope they all work properly

@@jordanthomson7682 mine failed on a 2 month old car

While the airbags may work on a 20 year old car. In a crash the newer cars are far stronger overall as they have to pass more stringent crash tests now. Even my wife's 2016 jeep Patriot (a total turd) fails the small overlap crash test terribly. The body deforms so badly that the airbag doesn't even fire towards the driver

@@FACTOTUM_55 yeah i dont know, had a crash in my 95 Maxima vs a 2007 c class, i definetly won lol. He was in pieces, while i could drive mine up the trailer

:(

nooooooo

:(( wow how do you know

@@isaacvillanueva9616 en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Steve_Truglia

Damit

Not by a long shot. I’ve never owned a car that was less than 10 years old at the time of purchase. How rich do they think their audience are?

Is he dead?

@@truth.speaker yes

@@artaskk that's a shame. Seemed like a sound guy

Yes. This was actually same as hiting a solid wall at 15 mph

The impact force at point of impact is 30mph not 15.

@@Simon-ui6db the escort moved in the collision so half the energy was put into the escort meaning the energy was the same as a 15mph crash

@@Simon-ui6db The energy/force in impact is how much pressure you feel on yourself. Hitting an immovable object means you slow down from 30mph to 0 in less than a meter, that being the crushing of your car. In crash tests wall is always deformable to simulate other vehicle, so you slow down slower. Here the vehicle wasnt stopped, this was just a quick deceleration from 30 to about 15mph, similiar to hitting a wall at 15mph and coming to standstill.

Plus the dumbass took the battery out of the Escort. Like that's ever gonna make a difference.

Almost no difference.

That’s because he knew it was gonna happen. He knew he was going to crash that car on purpose. Now imagine yourself as a regular person driving down the street. You’re kind of in a rush because you don’t want to be late for work or you don’t want to stand your date up or whatever other circumstance you happen to be in. You’re not speeding or anything like that, so all is well in the grand scheme of things. Suddenly a dickhead in a BMW pulls out of a junction without looking. You’re a good driver, so you obviously sense immediately that something dangerous is happening. You slam on the brakes, but it isn’t enough and you hit the car that pulled out. You’ll be shook up by what’s just happened because, as much as anything, you simply weren’t expecting it. Now here’s a whole other scenario. You’re a stuntman, just like the dude in the video. Before the stunt, you’re briefed on all the relevant safety stuff and the fire department and paramedics are on standby in case anything goes wrong, whereas in the previous scenario you’d have to call the emergency services yourself and explain the accident to them along with any injuries anyone sustained if it was a serious wreck. You’re expecting it this time. It doesn’t just catch you by surprise.

1%

​@@Oystein87 Highly doubtful. The resistance applied by the handbrake being on on the Ford would have not allowed the energy of the impact to dissipate through the Ford freely moving away as was shown, but rather rendering the impact stronger for both the Rover and its driver.

@@fl570 The car would still move away with the handbreak on so it would make less difference than you think.

It smells bad when deployed right?

@Daniel Villeda well the one in the steering wheel broke my nose so I couldn't really smell anything but blood. I can say that where the horn button was before it went off was very very hot.

They’re all freighters now. No more passenger carrying 747s now. Just as well Bruce Dickinson from Iron Maiden never listened when people told him not to give up the day job 🤣🤣🤣🤣🎸✈️

unfortunately he is no more. I just found out. RIP. :(

Were you ok ? What car was it ?

@@paulmurcia5562 it was a 2016 vaxuhall astra elite,i was knocked out and broke my nose aswell i got a pretty big claim out of it but thats not the point really ridiculous u pay 23k for a car and expect to be safe

Arron Somerville yeah

i also bought a car with no airbag warning lights luckily i had to take the front off to do the radiator and i found the crash sensor was unplugged! someone had also removed the airbag bulb! all to save money on a broken sensor i think! so dangerous

@@somervillearron S u e. T h e m.

It’s because the seatbelt was far too tight and didn’t allow for slower deceleration. Not so safe

The Rover 600 used old fashioned 3 point seatbelts. Normally cars equipped with frontal airbags have pyrotechnic seatbelt pretensioners & load limiters, these work in conjunction with the frontal airbags to cushion the impact by pulling you back in to the seat ( pretensioner ) & then allowing you to move forward again in a controlled way ( load limiter ) In lower speed frontal crashes the seatbelts can fire the pretensioner to restrain the occupants & the airbags not deploy as they won't have any effect. Some Vauxhall / Opal & Rover cars when airbags first started to be fitted used a spring loaded seatbelt pretensioner mounted under the seat which would pull the buckle down tight on a frontal impact - very easy to lose a finger if removing the front seat & you forget to install the safety clip.

Because they leaned his seat back nearly all the way.

Yeah that's a question that's been bothering my mind for a long time. In general all cars need their airbags and seatbelt tensioners replaced after 10 years. Yet there is not a garage in the WORLD that does this as a standard procedure, nor is there any inspection done by an agency to check if it's been done at áll. So it's nothing more the a paper tiger.

The video is 14 yrs old

Why? If he wouldn’t have done that he would have smashed his face into the airbag, possibly breaking his nose.

@@xXAlmdudlerXx ... which would have made it a more realistic crash, as they said they they would be doing

My thoughts exactly. I know enough from F1 that you always let go of the wheels before impact. No wonder he hurt his wrist. But I agree with the real life thing. We probably try to save a crash from happening so our hands are probably on the wheel. But good to know the hands don't obstruct the airbag if the wheel is held correctly! That could break a wrist.

No

@@TeimonKauppa739 You took your time answering! LOL

Probably because the seat belt pre tensioner did its job as well..

You don't even know how much that stresses me. According to VW website my car is fine, but my trust issues still tell me what if. Even tho the car is older than the cars with the bad airbags. And the Takata airbags went bad even in a 3 year old car.

The Escort is still around somehow. It was sold again in 2012 and currently SORN in storage,

It's mph, not kmh, so it simulates accident in a city. Pretty nice test.

No seatbelt pretensions or load limiters fitted on the Rover 600. EURO NCAP tested it in 1997.

@@leepower2717 The results now makes sense. But still a bad car to be in during crash!

The airbag was mainly useless because they leaned his seat back all the way, presumably to prevent him smacking the wheel with his head in the case the bag didn't inflate.

He braced for impact and injured his wrist because of the absorption of shock. Just saying it's a possibility that's why he didn't move that much on impact.

She called it a 10 year old car

@@steveb8189 so today is 2020 that car should be from 2010 but I'm sure that cars from that age have technology not just airbags

@@BlackCat-ty4st That was my point. The car is a P reg so was made in August 1996 to July 1997 - so this was filmed in 2006 - 2007. I presumed you knew the car year

To simulate the human body, bearing in mind the head is the heaviest body part there is

Speed was very very low. Like hitting wall at 15mph

The speed is a lot higher so the body has more inertia before the seatbelts lock with pretensioners.

Up to you. My project-car-to-be has no airbags (1970s) and is made of fiberglass too, so any substantial accident you're just not walking away from. Back in the day there was just a different mindset; you were either lucky or you weren't. However that does nestle somewhere into an era where seatbelts were becoming mandatory across the world, innovations in crumple zones and heck even airbags did exist even if they weren't quite mainstream. But again up to you. If it's that old check the seatbelt anchor points out, could even have an extra plate welded to the chassis (if whatever it is is old enough to have a chassis too ofc!)

This manufacturer never sourced takata parts, what are you on about??

It's because of sodium azide

Like what?

How does it smell?

Airbags weren't standard 30 years ago. Duh.

@@supergeekjay I remember reading somewhere that they were an option on the 1974 Cadillac Calais

Nonsense, do your research as it isn't. It's an Accord.

Rover shared many parts and designs with honda.

Yeah that's a great Idea, lets test airbags in old car, so we are using a car with out a airbag 🤦‍♂️