👍…… and heirs according to the promise 🙏

He’s a heretic.

Christians are children of Abraham- not Moses. Christians are children of God.

I have a few family members in the HR movement. A very complicated and confusing bunch. Most of the comments here attest to that fact. I’m coming to believe that the devil is very crafty and deceptive to many that are following this very cleverly deceptive teaching. “ The Spirit (God the creator) shall lead you ( The believer and followers of Jesus) into all truth”, according to His written word of course.

@@bryanregier4228 your family members are proud. Hebrews roots heretics are guilty of the gross sin of pride. What sucks for them is Jesus loathes pompous Pharisees.

No it's actually truth falling away from Yahweh is apostasy like yourself ​@@rayray4192

Genesis 12:3 Hallelujah

Wrong that mixed multitude was Israelites that mixed their seed with Heathen Nations, you don’t know our book so put it down, this mixed Multitude was not different nations of people.

@@israel4reel787 well, you say it is not different people but the bible clearly calls them out as a different people. It just is what it is. 🙂

@@jeremiahchapman9288 The Bible does not call them mixed Nations, it calls them a Mixed Multitude do you know the difference ?

@@jeremiahchapman9288 Second look up that word Multitude in the Blue letter Bible and you will see that it’s talking about Israelites mixing their seed with other Heathen nations that were in Egypt when they were there.

Agree. Michael is a true defender of Biblical Christianity, which centered upon Yeshua the Jewish Messiah. Not on some Roman god and traditions.

Michael @ Olive Branch?

@@straitmind4762 It's not Christianity. Or Judaism. Those are man-made religions. Michael teaches the Word. That's it.

Steve Gregg has a lot on this topic. You should search him out.

@@auntieannayes from Olive Branch Fellowship

Hi Michael! Thanks so much for your respectful comments. You pointed out that there are people in the comments section talking about 'breaking free' from the Hebrew Roots Movement and asked, "Why do you want to break free from the truth?" And my answer is that HRM is not the truth. At least that's the perspective of the commenters who have left HRM, and it's my belief as well. Our problem isn't with the Torah, it's with _Torahism,_ which is the unbiblical application of Torah laws to followers of Jesus. So for us, to label Hebrew Roots theology as untrue is not to reject the Torah. Not at all. As for Acts 24:5, here is an important detail you may have missed: It's not Paul who identifies himself as a ringleader of the Nazarenes. That false accusation came from his adversary Tertullus, who was the spokesman for the high priest Ananias and the Jewish elders. Blessings, Rob

@@TheBiblicalRoots But Paul continues to say "according to the way which they call a sect so I worship the God of my fathers." There is only one sect mentioned in Acts 24 and there is no reason to believe Paul is identifying himself with any other sect. I would have to respectfully disagree and say that application of Torah to followers of Yehsua is most Biblical. In fact, one of the New Testament struggles of the Apostles is the reconciliation of Gentiles back into Torah obedience, not for the purpose of salvation but for sanctification. Acts 15:19-21 is a perfect example. Again my question is: why would anyone want to break free from that which is sweeter than honey from the comb and more precious than refined gold? Psalm 119 is the longest chapter in all of Scripture and all 22 stanzas contained therein communicate to us just how awesome, beautiful, beneficial, lovely and helpful the Law of Moses is. Why do we want to distance ourselves from that?

@@michaelchristian5963 amen brother, love His beautiful Holy perfect Torah.🙏🕎

@@leeengland3682 ❤️🕎🌿

@@michaelchristian5963 nice reply, but unfortunately it goes apon Def ears. It's all about Sin One! It's the Decievers Job to make Man go against YAHs Torah, his First instruction.... Only YAH can open their eyes, it's His Glory. Praise YAH firmly Worship YAH humbley Give thanks for the Messiah Halalu-YAH.

Here, here, well said.

There is also no covenant with the gentiles.

Can you imagine standing before YAHshua with a testimon of teaching against Torah of Heart. ECC 12 13 When all has been heard, the conclusion of the matter is this: Fear God and keep His commandments, because this is the whole duty of man. 1 tim 1:5 Now the purpose of the commandment is love from a pure HEART, from a good conscience, and from sincere faith, Duet 30 10 if you obey the LORD your God and keep his commands and decrees that are written in this Book of the Torah/Law and turn to the LORD your God with all your HEART and with all your soul. Proverbs 3 3 Let know loving commitment ant TRUTH forsake you-bind them around your neck, write them on the tablet of your HEART. 2 cor 3 3 And you show that you are a letter from Christ delivered by us, written not with ink but with the Spirit of the living God, not on tablets of stone but on tablets of human HEARTS. Ezekiel 11 19-20 And I will give them one HEART, and a new spirit I will put within them. I will remove the HEART of stone from their flesh and give them a HEART of flesh, that they may walk in "my statutes" and keep my rules and obey them. And they shall be my people, and I will be their God. Jer 31 33 But this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my TORAH within them, and I will write it on their HEARTS. And I will be their God, and they shall be my people Hebrews 10 16 This is the covenant I will make with them after that time, says the Lord. I will put my TORAH/ law in their HEARTS, and I will write them on their minds.” Daniel 7 28 Hitherto is the end of the matter. As for me Daniel, my cogitations much troubled me, and my countenance changed in me: but I kept the matter in my HEART Isaiah 56 6-7 And foreigners who bind themselves to the LORD to minister to him, to love the name of the LORD, and to be his servants, all who keep the Sabbath without desecrating it and who hold fast to my covenant- these I will bring to my holy mountain and give them joy in my house of prayer. Their burnt offerings and sacrifices will be accepted on my altar; for my house will be called a house of prayer for all nations.”

Amen!

@Mark Allen the Covenant was not with the Jews but Abraham sorry there were no Jews until 2Kings , isrealites if you will , who could be any of us all around the world integrated and now Gentiles by any other name except to God , who calls us His chosen

Thank you, Anastasia!

Amen, Amen.

Blessings and Shalom Brother Dan🪔🌾🌌🙋. All Praise to Yah.😌😔

@@anastasiarodriguez1005 Praise YAH firmly Worship YAH humbley Give thanks for the Messiah Halalu-YAH !

The reason why his name is not in the spotlight is because he submits himself to Abba. He is a man that walks in Teshuva to please Him whom created all things. This messenger of the living word is living out the instructions of YHWH and staying humble in his walk being an example to the flock, seeking no esteem from men but that of the Father. I am a witness and stand at the throne with this statement. Bless YHWH messengers. This being said, my comment is in no way attacking this video. As we all are called to be good bereans and test all things. Fast and pray to the Ruach Ha'kodesh for leading into understanding the mystery of lawlessness. This will lead one back to His covenant signs with opens the doors to the House of Yisra’ĕl. For His name sake and Kingdom work I pray you receive. One must walk deeper with a Shepherd like Michael and explore his teachings.

In Christ we are the people of GOD, out of Christ we’re not the people of GOD , regardless of definition of any group Gal 3:

Wrong.

Very wrong you are not of that man lineage if your are not created from his loins

Native-born Israelites and foreigners are equal before the Lord and are subject to the same decrees. This is a permanent law for you, to be observed from generation to generation. Numbers 15:14‭-‬15 NLT There are many many more verses in the Torah that speak of the foreigner being part of Israel. Search the word, foreigner or stranger or goim.

"This is what the Lord says: “Be just and fair to all. Do what is right and good, for I am coming soon to rescue you and to display my righteousness among you. Blessed are all those who are careful to do this. Blessed are those who honor my Sabbath days of rest and keep themselves from doing wrong. “Don’t let foreigners who commit themselves to the Lord say, ‘The Lord will never let me be part of his people.’ (Israel) .........For this is what the Lord says:...... “I will also bless the foreigners who commit themselves to the Lord, who serve him and love his name, who worship him and do not desecrate the Sabbath day of rest, and who hold fast to my covenant. I will bring them to my holy mountain of Jerusalem and will fill them with joy in my house of prayer. I will accept their burnt offerings and sacrifices, because my Temple will be called a house of prayer for all nations. For the Sovereign Lord, who brings back the outcasts of Israel, says: I will bring others, too, besides my people Israel.” Isaiah 56:1‭-‬8 NLT

Don’t forget that you Gentiles used to be outsiders. You were called “uncircumcised heathens” by the Jews, who were proud of their circumcision, even though it affected only their bodies and not their hearts. In those days you were living apart from Christ. You were excluded from citizenship among the people of Israel, and you did not know the covenant promises God had made to them. You lived in this world without God and without hope. But now you have been united with Christ Jesus. Once you were far away from God, but now you have been brought near to him through the blood of Christ. Ephesians 2:11‭-‬13 For Christ himself has brought peace to us. He united Jews and Gentiles into one people when, in his own body on the cross, he broke down the wall of hostility that separated us. Ephesians 2:14 NLT

If Michael is the Best Teacher, then Why are you Here?

Sounds more like a personality cult... where everyone else is wrong ...yikes that's scary !

@@heidiranger6106because it comes up in our feed showing someone who is disagreeing with what he teaches.

He preaches the scriptures rather than the doctrines of man, did Michael tell you this? I see lots of faithful Bible teachers that work through the Bible verse by verse.

Hey Pip! May I ask, what verses in the Bible caused you to come out of HRM or was there something else? How would you, in your experience, witness to those in HRM with what you know now? I've never been in Torah observanance personally, but I have many friends who I deeply care for who are in HRM. I feel the Holy Spirit calling me to reach them somehow but I'm not sure what are the best ways to do that. Thanks!

@@sethsisneros8369 I'll be honest. It wasn't just one thing, it was many things over time. I'm still on the journey myself so I still have a lot I'm trying to figure out. But the main thing for me was a switch in my eschatology. I switched from premillennialism to Postmillennialism. Because of this switch a lot of my previously held beliefs about the law didn't fit with my new perspective. Then it became a matter of removing what didn't fit and keeping what did. For example in the Postmillennial view we believe that the millennial kingdom is now, it's the time between Christ's first coming and second coming. And that Christ is building His kingdom on earth now and that a nations will eventually be christianized and all of Christ's enemies will be defeated before He returns. Once I realized that the feasts and ceremonial laws don't fit with a global faith, I came to the realization that something had to have changed in the new covenant. That it's impossible for a global faith of billions of Christians to all make pilgrimages to the temple 3 times a year and for everyone to keep the same calendar which is tied to the agricultural cycle of the land of Israel is impossible. Then it dawned on me just how impractical observing the Torah outside of the land of Israel really is. Then I did a study into the book of Hebrews and realized that there was a change in the ceremonial aspects of the law. And thet the temple being destroyed in AD70 signified that change. The old order had come to an end. There is a lot more but I'll leave it there. Sorry if it wasn't very helpful.

@@pipinfresh might help if you begin to learn the difference between belief and knowledge When you build on belief, it's like setting a foundation on sand. You don't have absolute knowledge about what you're building on and a good storm can wash away all your work Rather.. clear the sand away and find the rock to build on. A rock is solid and sure. It is absolute knowledge

Wow, small world! I guess my biggest question for you would be if I accurately framed Mike’s position in my video? I try to be very cautious about not misrepresenting other’s views.

@@TheBiblicalRoots I am familiar with Michael as well. He was a part of Curtis Reid's ministry "Donkey Speaks". I think you handled the video with respect and accuracy. I hope Michael reaches out to you and maybe do a video

The steak and potatoes thing is so very true brother. I'm right there with you. Praise Yah!

Good analogy my friend , I heard that before. I was starving then I found Jesus. Jesus was never enough for you that's why you lost your identity. GOD BLESS MAN.

@@irvinquijano ?? I guess not. You got all the answers. God Bless!

Doesn't Michael promote Circumcision as a sign of the Covenant & that we arenot yet in the New Cov?

@@auntieanna yes but he doesn't teach the circumcision is REQUIRED for SALVATION, because it's not. Circumcision is an outward reflection of an inward heart circumcision. That's the whole point. It's all about heart matters. He does teach that the New Covenant hasn't started yet. May I suggest hearing it straight from him, as to his position? He has a very unique gift of connecting scripture in such an amazing way... It's simple to follow along so if you have questions or would not be hard to keep track of them and ask whatever you need to ask. 🙂

We dont seeing the gospel being preached in the Hebrew Roots Movement!

The Messiah Yeshua IS Yah!

I'm an open book, T.

Exodus 20:12 T Bishop and sons

Hi Vern! Actually, that's not my position. I addressed the issue of the "house rules" in this video at 34:26. Shalom, Rob

Don't expect Rob Solberg to truthfully respond. He continues to distort the truth of God's word because he is a theologian who has been taught to defend a view that cannot be defended, not to mention that he has a Greek mentality, which prevents him from allowing the Spirit of God to enlighten him with the truth of God's word, which God made clear the first time he spoke. Look at how he responded to you.

His response to me was concise and completely courteous. I don't see what your issue is with his response but yours was mostly an ad hominem which I don't appreciate him doing (which he does quite often) or the pro torah side

I replied again, or so I thought but the comment apparently didn't get sent,,I'll need to redo it...hold on

I watched the time stamp you mentioned and still am dumfounded as to how you can you can agree that Israel is the family name, that it is this family that we are adopted into, yet still insist that Christians stand separate from the house rules. You insist that, as believers, out identity doesn’t change, what? The whole theology sets back up the middle wall and separates you from the family by means of your refusal to identify with the family and acknowledge the family rules At about 34:50, you use the term “law that God gave Israel at Mt Sinai”. A sharp point of disagreement which I’m sure many of my “Torahist” (your term) would have is labeling the Torah as such. Your insistence that this body of laws, was given by Moses, in written form, on Mount Sinai, didn’t exist before Sinai and is essentially nullified in Messiah, is totally unbiblical and causes you to then set up many associated strawmen. Yes, under the MelkiZedek priesthood, the Levitical priesthood is not currently in effect, including all things directly specific to said priesthood. This in no way affects any law not directly specific to the Levitical priesthood. In fact, Moses was already up on the mountain receiving Torah during the issue with the golden calf, hence the addition of the levitical priesthood is not an integral component of Torah. A modern analogy would be, if by some miraculous event the United States internal revenue service was completely abolished tomorrow, that would in no way affect the entire body of U.S. laws, only that directly part of the tax code Considering Amos 3:7, your view on this would have to have been clearly announced in advance. Yet the direct offset is true. We see nothing throughout the Tanak but the wonderful, glorious, eternal relevance of the Torah for all nations, see Psalms 119, Isaiah 8:20 42:21, Ezekiel 36:27 Malachi 4:4-6. Christianity looks at Malachi 4, flips that one single page and totally reinterprets “law” in a context entirely disjointed from everything written prior. Also, I wanted to add in my disagreement your comment at 26:35 where you said Cornelius was the first gentile convert. The first Gentile convert would have been Caleb, which as you know means “dog” in Hebrew (כלב) See Numbers 13:6, 14:24, 32:12 Joshua 14:6

Of course! I believe it is proveable both houses were united first century ♡. No more division :), we are all One.

Thank you so much, Julia! Shalom, Rob

Julia Reynolds. Maybe as a Jewish believer it be evident to you that God has laid out a birds eye view of history from creation to Yehoshua’s first and 2nd coming all in His Holy Days on the first month of His calendar. Got Torah Got Truth

I love to hear that more Jews know Yeshua is the real Messiah and more are coming to their priestly king who is from Old and bigger than David he is the living Word of God who became flesh and 1st mission was to deal with sin as he knew the temple was about to be destroyed and brought gentiles into the fold and Yeshua is the only one who has brought billions of gentiles to the True God of Israel the Father Son and Rauch HaKodesh are the God of Israel although they deny it but this is what ancient Jews believed ❤️🙏

Julia Reynolds, thanks for sharing. Many years ago, I was led to faith in the Messiah through a Jewish believer in Messiah. His name was Howard Mark Mandel. He sang in a small music group that they called Sonship. He has gone on to be with the Lord, however we did manage to stay in touch periodically through email. It’s beautiful to see how the Lord opens the eyes of all who seek the truth, both Jewish and Gentile! You worded it so well when you talked about being contextual, literal, grammatically and historically in touch, through these contentious issues. It’s amazing that when you get down on your knees and pray for God to reveal his truth to you and then open up the Bible, how it comes alive and you can see through the deceptions when we are willing to see the truth! I have been viewing Professor Solberg’s videos for awhile now. It’s refreshing how he simply points his viewers to the Scriptures, which explain themselves! As opposed to How some of the opposing views seem to really struggle and try to twist scriptures into meaning something that they don’t really say! Yeshua promised that those who seek the TRUTH would FIND it!! Shalom to you and your house!

@@PaulRasmussen18 just think about what you said, Billions, what part of billions fit on the narrow path? How many billions make a small remnant.... 🤔 BTW what (edit) why r u calling out David's small Stature?

You're welcome, Christian! Thanks, Rob

I appreciate that, Shane! Blessings, Rob

What would you say to all the nay-sayers in the comments of this video? Shalom.

What scripture says Adam was taught for 7 years?

Which law do you live by? Gen 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. Gen 9:3 Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things. Lev 11:4 Nevertheless these shall ye not eat of them that chew the cud, or of them that divide the hoof: Mark 7:18, 19 So He said to them, “Are you thus without understanding also? Do you not perceive that whatever enters a man from outside cannot defile him, because it does not enter his heart but his stomach, and is eliminated, thus purifying all foods? Rom 14:2, 3 For one believes he may eat all things, but he who is weak eats only vegetables. Let not him who eats despise him who does not eat, and let not him who does not eat judge him who eats; for God has received him.

@@goldenarm2118 are you implying the Father's Word is filled with contradictions?

@@digimike8 the book of Jubilees

@@reanmouton8413 Of course not. The Word of God is without contradiction. Your understanding of it MUST harmonize. Your original post does no such thing.

Just a note, Most Hebrew roots people do not proclaim your are saved by the Law, but there are all sorts under every umbrella. The many articles that start off with the heading "Grace vs Law" sets the stage to believe that the 2 are mutually exclusive, - they are not, they serve closely linked but different purposes. We are saved by faith through grace UNTO good works.

New Covenant Whole Gospel: What the modern Church needs is a New Covenant Revival (Heb. 9:10) in which members of various denominations are willing to re-examine everything they believe and see if it agrees with the Bible, instead of the traditions of men. We need to be like the Bereans. It will be a battle between our flesh and the Holy Spirit. It will not be easy. If you get mad and upset when someone challenges your man-made Bible doctrines, that is your flesh resisting the truth found in God's Word. Nobody can completely understand the Bible unless they understand the relationship between the Old Covenant given to Moses at Mount Sinai and the New Covenant fulfilled in blood at Calvary. What brings all local churches together into one Body under the blood of Christ? The answer is found below. Let us now share the Old Testament Gospel found below with the whole world. On the road to Emmaus He said the Old Testament is about Him. He is the very Word of God in John 1:1, 14. Awaken Church to this truth. Jer 31:31 Behold, the days come, saith the LORD, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Jer 31:32 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by husband unto them, saith the LORD: Jer 31:33 But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, saith the LORD, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their God, and they shall be my people. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1 (Gal. 3:16)? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel (John 1:49)? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? What did Paul say about Genesis 12:3 in Galatians 3:8? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? Once a person comes to understand the New Covenant promised to Israel and Judah in Jeremiah 31:31-34, which is found fulfilled by Christ during the first century in Hebrews 8:6-13, and Hebrews 10:16-18, and specifically applied to the Church in 2 Corinthians 3:6-8, and Hebrews 12:22-24, man-made Bible doctrines fall apart. Let us now learn to preach the whole Gospel until He comes back. The King of Israel is risen from the dead! (John 1:49, Acts 2:36) We are not come to Mount Sinai in Hebrews 12:18. We are come instead to the New Covenant church of Mount Zion and the blood in Hebrews 12:22-24. 1Jn 3:22 And whatsoever we ask, we receive of him, because we keep his commandments, and do those things that are pleasing in his sight. 1Jn 3:23 And this is his commandment, That we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ, and love one another, as he gave us commandment. 1Jn 3:24 And he that keepeth his commandments dwelleth in him, and he in him. And hereby we know that he abideth in us, by the Spirit which he hath given us. The following verses prove the Holy Spirit is the master teacher for those now in the New Covenant. Jer 31:34 And they shall teach no more every man his neighbour, and every man his brother, saying, Know the LORD: for they shall all know me, from the least of them unto the greatest of them, saith the LORD: for I will forgive their iniquity, and I will remember their sin no more. Mar 1:8 I indeed have baptized you with water: but he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost. Joh 14:26 But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you. Act 11:16 Then remembered I the word of the Lord, how that he said, John indeed baptized with water; but ye shall be baptized with the Holy Ghost. 1Co 12:13 For by one Spirit are we all baptized into one body, whether we be Jews or Gentiles, whether we be bond or free; and have been all made to drink into one Spirit. 1Jn 2:27 But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you, and ye need not that any man teach you: but as the same anointing teacheth you of all things, and is truth, and is no lie, and even as it hath taught you, ye shall abide in him. Watch the KZfaq videos “The New Covenant” by David Wilkerson, or Bob George, and David H.J. Gay.

I agree with a lot you said but I want to clarify for anyone reading that the reason the stranger could eat an animal that died naturally but we are instructed not to is because the stranger is not in a covenant relationship with the God of Israel but we are. All Gods instructions are for our good but someone living outside of the covenant doesn’t have to follow instructions specifically for His set apart people. It’s all about having a heart Circumcision and being in a covenant relationship. Once we are grafted into Yahs family his instructions apply to us and show us how to live set apart lives 🤍

Right! No one that I know who walks this walk teaches that "you lose your salvation for not keeping the law or salvation is by the law". However, Yeshua Himself said you will be called least in The Kingdom for teaching that... so I'm going to go with that.

@@sammurray12912 we are not saved by the law. keeping his commandments is evidence of our faith. only yahusha can resurrect us. Not law keeping. Its a free gift of god least no man should boast, Now your in christ unto good works.

Welcome, Sammy! I'm so glad you're here. Blessings, Rob

Thank you, Howard. Blessings, Rob

Howard. Revelation 7 does not include the tribe of Dan. If you understand the meanings of the names that are given you might find that there is a message in the names. Got Torah Got Truth

@@harryabrahams2770 Thanks, Harry. I'm currently looking at the prophetic passages regarding restoring the land and the people and seeking to work out how this fits with the NT promises regarding the new creation, so any thoughts are appreciated.

@@howardbabcom the Abrahamic Covenant is about restoring the land to the rightful owners, his descendants and how the nations of the earth will be blessed. Genesis 26:4,5 obedience to God’s Torah. Got Torah Got Truth

Didn't know practicing Judaism was so common a viewer here.

Yes. Sadly Christains follow manned religions (the dragon) not YAHshua. Or the Givin Word. ● It's over our pay scale ● But theyll be dealt with: Rev 12-17 And the dragon was wroth with the woman, and went to make war with the remnant of her seed, which keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of YAHshua Humasheoc ie Jesus Christ.

Good bye Sundown. It was always fun reading your posts. I'm sorry to see you go. I was waiting for the day when you would have a post showing the love of God and not contempt for Solberg. Remember love the people disagree with their message is a more Christian way to converse in comment sections. Shalom!

Yeah, well, Rob Solberg is very likely a Jesuit plant and just doing his job of subversion anyway.

Amen sista! 🥰

That's really cool! I'm thrilled to hear that some of my work is helpful in the work you're doing. Bless you. (And yes, that black Les Paul is my favorite!) Rob

The truth that sets you free by biblical definition is a transcendent truth which is the Torah since God does not change He is the same yesterday today and forever. Got Torah Got Truth

@Harry Abrahams I think we will stick with our Messiah. You should read Galatians 4:21-31 2 Corinthians 3:4-18 They speak of The Torah keepers who point fingers and tell everyone how they are doing it wrong.. You are fleshy and we who submit ourselves to our Messiah we walk in obedience we walk in The Spirit.

@@TruthSetFree-zm1ep I see you font know and/or understand why we do the law/ Torah. We are saved by grace and grace alone, but what then? Then we keep the law, thus we do the law BECAUSE we are saved, not to be saved. That's why Christians choose which laws to keep, example some think to be gay is fine, others not.

@@TruthSetFree-zm1ep Galatians 4:21 there are 2 laws Paul is referring to, the law you need to listen to is the Mosaic Law it sets you free from the oral law ( man made nonsense like Christmas and Easter which our Heavenly Father never instructed us to do ). If you haven’t got a grasp of the first chapter of Galatians where Paul refers to man made instructions as Judaism then the rest will remain a mystery to you. Paul is basically saying the opposite of what most preachers teach. This is why God says He is going to replace the shepherds with the shepherds of His own choosing. Got Torah Got Truth

"And this I say, that the law, which came four hundred and thirty years later, cannot annul the covenant that was previously confirmed by God in Christ, that it should make the promise of no effect." Here we see that the promise, to the seed, which is one, which is Christ, was created before the Law, and before the National establishment. The heirs of the promise who are counted as the seed, are those who are "In Christ".

Being grafted in Olive tree is not invented by Paul, He took it from Tanakh.. Olive tree is Israel

@@lansan3430 did you watch the video?

Genesis 12:3 Through Abram ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL the families of the earth shall BE BLESSED ALL ALL ALL ALL ALL Despite what these Cults teach

@@TruthSetFree-zm1ep WAIT, do you believe that sinners are included in this blessing also??

I have a question, why does the Bible call us Jews then?

Christians can be either Jews or Gentiles, and there's a distinction between the two within the church, but they're all one in Messiah. Romans 11, Ephesians 3, Philippians 3, Galatians , and First Peter 4 demonstrate this.

The Torah is referred to in scripture as the light which guides our way. Got Torah Got Truth

@Harry Abrahams Who’s stripes healed you man?

@@TruthSetFree-zm1ep Yehoshua’s stripes healed me , that’s why I want to hear Him say well done good and faithful servant as opposed to I never knew you, depart from Me you who practice lawlessness ( sinning ) Got Torah Got Truth

Yehoshua?

@@CleanlinessisGodliness yep especially in 1 Peter 4:16

@@CleanlinessisGodliness nothing wrong with that word

Michael 12345 …in Acts were the believers calling themselves Christians or were others referring to them as Christians ? “ a mocking term, little christes “ the believers in Acts referred to themselves as people of the way. In 1 Peter 4:16 it is better understood as followers of Christ, which is different than calling themselves Christians. Got Torah Got Truth

@@harryabrahams2770 sorry, but nowhere does the text say that it was derogatory. But, for the sake of argument, even if it was, the fact that Christians gladly used this term for centuries, moreover, all prominent Christians from Augustine to Calvin, or from Spurgeon to Washer felt okay to be called Christians - that's more than enough for me. Regarding 1 Peter 4:16 - Peter clearly used the word "Christian" - you can dislike it or try to reinterpret the obvious word usage, but this is a fact. Regarding 'Got Torah Got Truth' - no one argues, that every word of God (including Torah) is true. The problem is, if the Torah is the final and complete truth (which needed no logical development and completion, if I may say so), what was the point of Jesus's incarnation and crucifiction? Didn't Jesus accomplish something important and play a big role (to say the least) in God's redemption plan for humanity? If Hebrew Roots theology is true, it means that Jesus's incarnation and crucifiction changed nothing, it means that Jesus was solely a prophet like Elijah, or Isaiah or John the Baptist. And Hebrew Roots guys clearly teach that, maybe not explicitly though. They teach that the sacrifices still would be needed, and the only reason there are no sacrifices is that the Temple is destroyed - but this teaching clearly contradicts the New Testament, especially the book of Hebrews. And there is much more, like circumcision issues and so on.

@@harryabrahams2770 by the way, your interpretation of the word “Christian” as “little Christ” is completely wrong. The word Christian comes from the Greek word “christianos” which comes from “Christos” - anointed one, and “ianos” - a suffix that means supporter or member of some party or movement. Like for instance “Caesarianos” - a supporter of Caesar, “Herodians” - supporters of Herod etc.

Thank you, Derrick! Bless you, brother. Do you mind if I ask what it was, in general, that led you out of HRM? Rob

@@TheBiblicalRoots I sent you an email from your website. Check your spam folder if you don't see it.

It's too long to put in here LOL.

Praise the Lord your out. This is a great channel to get info for conversations with those still in.

The hook for me was twofold. We are Jewish on my mother's side which was the first hook and although we were not raised Jewish I was hearing things I had never heard before from my cousin who is a messianic rabbi who went to yeshiva. This is the second hook. I heard the wonderful teaching about Christ fulfilling the biblical feasts. These are wonderful teachings that should have been taught in the church I grew up in. The lack of solid biblical doctrine, in my opinion, is the very reason people end up wasting years of their lives going the wrong direction. Through prayer, Bible study, and listening to solid Bible teachers like Michael Heiser, Adrian Rogers, etc I was finally able to come back into what I believe is a solid biblical base

You've been told?

@@vernmiroth1626 yes

Hello, WIH! Great to hear from you. You asked, "If gentiles become a part of the 'Family of God' wouldn’t they be expected to follow the 'rules of the house' in the same way that the 'biological' children (the Israelites) do?" My answer is yes! The "house rules" are the same for every member of God's family. And because of the work of Yeshua on the cross, those house rules do not include the Mosaic rituals. This is not because God has changed. He ordained from the very beginning that it should be so. When God gave the law of Moses to Israel, He gave it to guide and guard His people until He sent His Son (Gal. 3:23-25). This was the plan all along. And Scripture says Gentiles are not required to live like Jews, and Jews are not required to live like Gentiles: "Was anyone at the time of his call already circumcised? Let him not seek to remove the marks of circumcision. Was anyone at the time of his call uncircumcised? Let him not seek circumcision. For neither circumcision counts for anything nor uncircumcision, but keeping the commandments of God. Each one should remain in the condition in which he was called. (1 Cor. 7:18-20) The body of Christ is made up of both Jews and Gentiles. "Is God the God of Jews only? Is he not the God of Gentiles also? Yes, of Gentiles also, since God is one-who will justify the circumcised by faith and the uncircumcised through faith" (Rom. 3:29-30). In the last days, God will be worshipped by people "from *_every nation,_* from all tribes and peoples and languages" (Rev. 7:9). Shalom, Rob

@@TheBiblicalRoots Shalom Rob! Thank you so much for getting back with me so quick :-) I appreciate your clarification and agree with you on that. One area of "confusion" for me, is that in the last days, especially during the Millennial Kingdom (Ezekiel Temple), the sacrificial system will be re-established (though I understand, not for atonement for sin), people will come from all nations, Jews & gentiles, to observe the feasts in Jerusalem (good luck finding parking, lol) and to offer sacrifices. So, WHY is all of this necessary if Yeshua fulfilled the Torah once and for all? Yeshua will reign from Jerusalem for 1,000 years, after He locks Satan away, so there will be no "satanic" influence on people during that entire time. Everyone will know exactly who Yeshua is! So, wouldn't it be enough for the living people at that time, to just put their faith in Yeshua and worship God without all the external Torah customs, rituals & sacrifices? And if it will be required of believers and UNbelievers during the Millennial Kingdom, why not now? Other than the fact that there is no Temple today, if God's standards for worship and being in a real relationship with Him, required the sacrifices, feasts, Shabbats, kosher foods, rituals etc. etc. during the times of the Bible AND during the Millennial Kingdom, why would it not be required of us all now? Wasn't Yeshua's work enough for ALL times and ALL people? Did He not bring the Torah to its fulfillment once and for all? The entire scene of the Ezekiel Temple and the Millennial Kingdom seem to take us (or the living people at that time) straight back to Mt. Sinai. Or is it not? What am I missing here? "Hebrew Roots" people will use this to argue that God's standards for worship & relationship with Him do not change and therefor they are good & applicable to all believers at all times, just as they were applicable in the Pentateuch and just as they will be in the last days (at least whatever CAN be followed/kept, including the kosher laws (biblical), the seventh-day Shabbat, the Tzitzit (fringes), the beards, the feasts, etc. etc., just to name a few). So, because of that, they hold that as believers, Jew or Gentile, we are to live IN obedience to God's will and to His standards, which He laid out for us throughout the Torah, the Tanach AND the New Testament 😳 I hope you can help me sort through this 🙏 At the end of the day, I think that all believer want to live according to and in obedience to God's will (well, at least I like to think that...), so with everything I wrote above, what should this "obedience" really look like today, during the last days and forever? After all, I think we all agree that God does not change. Thanks again for responding & God bless! Ayelet

@@TheWORDinHEBREW I have been reading your comments and I hope you don't mind me butting in here. Much of what you have asked- I have asked myself, but never got a reasonable explanation. Mainstream popular Christian belief carelessly dis-regard the Law, on the other side the HR movement also have their biases, when they try to explain some of the difficult verses of Paul, sometimes they come up with good explanations that you know match the verse and the surrounding context, but other times I feel that they are clutching at straws and have not really understood what Paul was trying to convey either. Here is what I see - there is Law that defines sin, law that defines righteousness and holiness, all these Laws are allowing us to align ourselves with the very intrinsic nature of Yahuwah. These Laws cannot change, as the intrinsic nature of Yahuwah does not change. These Laws did not come into being at Sinai, since sin is transgression of the Law, and sin entered through Adam - long before Sinai. These Laws are therefore as unchanging as Yahuwah Himself. The covenant with Noah and with Abraham was with people who were already righteous in regard to observing and keeping the Law (Gen 26 1-5), but when we arrive at Sinai there was a mixed multitude full of transgressions. However the first covenant made there did NOT include a Levitical priesthood and a complex system of sacrifices. That came into play only after they broke the first covenant. In addition the covenant was sealed and blood ratified in Ex 24. Then Yahuwah calls Moses up to the mountain again to give him the testimony and a Law? What ? how can you add a law now after the book of the covenant has been sealed and sprinkled with blood? Some people say this was because Exodus was not written chronologically, however these details definitely have a chronological order. Moses then receives the details of the tabernacle (A place for Yahuwah's presence to be confined in) , and an Earthly high priest ( a mediator which the people essentially asked for when they said they do not want to hear Yahuwah's voice directly). This was a deviation from Yahuwah's perfect will as He wanted them to be a kingdom of priests and to have His manifest presence available to all of them, but He allowed this addition to accommodate their stony hearts and fear. Clearly the book of Hebrews explains how Yeshua is now high priest forever after the Melchizedek order and not Aaronic, how His sacrifices are more perfect, and this is what I believe Paul was referring to as the schoolmaster to bring us to Messiah - since clearly these were the " laws added because of transgressions" (Gal 3). Placing myself in the shoes of a first century devout Jew, trying to keep the Law and then coming to bring my sacrifices, it is easy to see how I could place too much trust in those "works" and believe I could receive justification from them, rather than just atonement. It must have been a massive mindset change, to let go of those and place faith in Messiah's sacrifice. The Law though that defines sin is still expected to be kept and guarded. Popular Christian doctrine places the Law into man-made categories of civil, ceremonial and moral. Sounds reasonable, but it is extremely and subtly deceptive, firstly the bible does not make those distinctions, secondly - civil is a category, ceremonial is category, moral is not a category but an underlying attribute of all Law. Breaking the Law is immoral, who is man to define the boundaries of moral when it comes to instructions issued from the most high ? This shows a clear lack of respectful fear. Following the man-defined moral code causes many to disregard the laws pertaining to holiness. Clearly from Peter's epistle he tells us to be Holy because He is holy, quoting from the Tanakh. When Yahuwah speaks about holiness it is always around those laws that so many in the popular Christian community dismiss as ceremonial or done away with. By keeping the laws pertaining to holiness, we are making a distinction, an identifying mark of the One we are worshipping. There are many atheists that have very good moral values, they are excellent spouses, they don't cheat , steal or break the last few of the 10 words. They even display amazing love for their fellow man but that is not sufficient. Then we level up to Christianity where they do the same but put the name Jesus on top of that, but don't believe they should follow the Laws that define holiness? The name Jesus is meaningless if you mis-represent Him by your lawlessness. The name I believe - and you can correct me here, in Hebrew culture carried more than just an identifier, it represented everything the person stood for , their authority , their character. What about the millennium? I am still trying to wrap my head around why there will be sacrifices there. Maybe as a memorial? The people were to sacrifice a Passover lamb long after the event actually happened, in a memorial gesture, so possibly this is a reason for the sacrifices in the millennium. I am not sure of this myself still trying to find reasonable commentary on it. However if people think the Law is a burden and something troublesome, then why are they looking forward to the Millennium reign, because that is how things are going to work during that timer period. Shalom

@@anthonykloppers3377 Shalom Anthony and thank you for your comment. You’ve made some very good observations which I believe I agree with, but let me ask you this: How would you differentiate between the Torah Law’s that defines holiness to those who don’t? I would think that Hebrew Roots people would argue that every Torah Law is a Law for holiness 😳 Is that what you are saying? I agree that God set up His standards from the beginning and His standards don’t change. He is Holy and we are to approach Him in holiness and purity. The question is, how can we really do that when there is no Temple, no physical sacrificial system, no Levitical priesthood and obviously God does not dwell on earth in the same way as He did when the Law was given? I believe that we are in the “age of Grace” now, thanks to what Yeshua accomplished in His first coming. The Law/Torah is still (and always will be) good, perfect, valid and useful, but thanks to the work of Yeshua, our sins are now covered by His sacrifice and we can now offer our sacrifices spiritually, and not physically. As for the Millennial Kingdom, one good explanation I heard recently for the sacrifices that Ezekiel describes, is that because there will be a physical Temple again and because God will be dwelling there, the sacrificial system will be reinstated as it was in the Torah. I believe Ezekiel 44-47 is literal rather than “metaphorical” or “memorial”. The people that will be living on earth then, after the tribulation, will be just as sinful as we are today, and will still need to cleanse and purify themselves before approaching God, especially since He will be dwelling with them again. These sacrifices will not take away sin (they never did!), but they will only cover over it. Having sacrifices in the millennial kingdom, does not mean that we have an obligation to “keep” Torah today. We have grace in that. I believe that anyone is welcome to “keep” any of those physical commandments, wear the tzizit, keep Kosher, keep Shabbat, celebrate the biblical feasts and so on, in whatever way they can, want to, or feel led to, but I don’t see how there can be any obligation to do so, and most definitely, I believe that our salvation and spiritual maturity can’t be dependent on any physical or external expressions of whatever we might believe, but is only depended on full hearted faith in Yeshua, His teachings and His work, otherwise, what exactly did He fulfill? It’s amazing to me how there can be so many interpretations of the “same” Word of God. Of course there are many factors that can affect one’s interpretation, like if they use a translation, which translation or original text, one’s “filters”, influences, exposures, background and of course agenda, just to name a few. As believers now, when we enter the Millennial Kingdom, we will be resurrected with new bodies, and we will not be subjected to the sacrificial system Ezekiel speaks about. We will be ruling over the entire world along side with Yeshua. We will have new hearts, and a NEW Law written on them. We will be sinless and pure. Therefore, I don’t really see how the sacrificial system in the Millennial Kingdom is relevant to believers today? In either case, this whole area is full of speculations, uncertainty and many opinions… At the end of the day, we will all know better after death… Until than, we should embrace the grace that we receive now through our faith in Yeshua and keep our hearts and minds as holy as we can 😉 Shabbat Shalom & Happy Sukkot (Feast of Tabernacles) 🙏

Hi Sam, 1. I don't refer to the Law of God and the Law of Moses as the same thing. 2. I don't teach that the Law of God is "not required but permissible" Rob

@@TheBiblicalRoots Who gave Moses the laws to give the people or did Moise established the law? You have been saying that Moses laws are not required but permissible, when you know that it is God who gave the laws. God is exposing you and soon your follower are going to see that you say one thing then you say you never said it, contradicting yourself.

@@TheBiblicalRoots This is Rob Solberg's response to Sundownsam3396. Read it carefully. @RLSolberg 53 minutes ago Hi Sam, 1. I don't refer to the Law of God and the Law of Moses as the same thing. 2. I don't teach that the Law of God is "not required but permissible." Now this deceiver says that he doesn't refer to the law of God and the law of Moses as the same. And this is the theologian you are praising for his point of view on the law of God? Who has deceived you, Galatians? Remember these words from Paul? Rob Solberg, that's who. If you believe that the Law of God is different from the law that Moshe brought to the Israelites, then you deserve to be deceived. Ask him for yourself: What was his primary intention in telling you that the laws of God are not required but permissible? And why didn't he say right away that he didn't think they were equal? because he is being used by the adversary to lie to the believers.

@@luiscajigas5567 let's see how many of his followers will question his statement.

@@sundownsam3369 Of course God gave those laws, Sam. They are His laws. The Bible consistently refers to them as the "Law of Moses" because Moses was the mediator. And this is a good opportunity for me to remind you of one of those laws, which is still in effect under the New Covenant: Ex 20:16; Deut 5:20; Prov 25:18; Matt 19:18; Mark 10:19; Luke 18:20. Blessings, Rob

1Co 7:18 Is any man called being circumcised? let him not become uncircumcised. Is any called in uncircumcision? let him not be circumcised. 1Co 7:19 Circumcision is nothing, and uncircumcision is nothing, but the keeping of the commandments of God.

This is a physical issue not a declaration of jewishness or gentilishness. We are called into the linage of Abraham through Christ. That is the FAMILY that God chose to establish as his NATION and ultimately, as his bride. If we want to be GRAFTED in, we will be grafted into his family, the descendants of Abraham. Gal 3:29 And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.

Thanks, Jeremiah! Why do you suppose a Gentile at that time would want or think they needed to be circumcised? R.

@@TheBiblicalRoots because if the judizers that wanted an outward show and did not care that God would reveal to his nature as they got to know him better. Judizers wanted them to DO the law before they were able to be saved. That is not how salvation works. Works follow with understanding and obedience.

IF YOU ARE CALLED. thats not something you should be called on and forced to do. thats something you do when your ready. this is what the pharisees were doing in galatia. Same thing in acts 15:1

Graft in means you join the citizenship of the heavenly Israel ( Yashar’el- delivered of Elohim) we graft in with the natural branches. Yah is building one house with one law- examples- Exodus 12:49, Deut 29:12, Ezekiel 47:22. In the New Jerusalem there are only 12 gates for the 12 tribes. We must graft in through the Everlasting covenant, brought about by the blood of Yahusha. I recommend listening to Michael from Olive Branch Fellowship

Thank you, Dee. That's fair. Where was I off in my understanding of Michael's teaching? Rob

@@TheBiblicalRoots As I said, I've only scratched the surface of the posted teachings from Olive Branch Fellowship, but I've yet to hear Michael teach that salvation is acheived by anything other than by faith in the death and resurrection of Jesus. I have heard him extensively read Scripture (OT & NT) and teach foundational issues addressed by at least 2 witnesses in Scripture, that most Christian pastor/teachers won't even attempt to unpack. I started with "Who Are We 1&2," "The Ancient Wedding Model," "The Why Of It All," and the "Moedim Series." I've been looking for false teachings that would bind us by Mosaic Law. I have found none, so far. I have heard him say that the feasts are not man's traditions, not Israel's feasts, but God's appointed holy convocations. I've also heard him teach that Torah teaches man how to respond to God's invitation to "draw near," and to observe God's feasts in remembrance of God's works; not ours. I don't know Michael, but I haven't seen the red flags you speak of. Again, I may be wrong, but from the view of a seasoned retired paralegal, I can detect when both sides of an argument/debate are not in direct conflict and one, or both, of the views aren't clearly understanding the other. I think you are both men of God, men of integrity, and both traveling your own journey. I think you both might learn a great deal from each other, if you listen to one another.

@@TheBiblicalRoots After posting my reply, I realized that I didn't really answer your question. I think you are not seeing the "weightier matter" (to coin Michael's phrase) of God's solution to the problem's of Israel becoming an adulterous bride at Mt. Sinai, that God is a jealous husband who has the legal right (under Torah) to require his wife to drink from the bitter cup and/or death, how God divorced Israel, how can God reconcile his bride to himself when Torah forbids remarriage to a divorced wife, how is God going to overcome other marriage laws in Torah, how will God gather and adorn His new bride (Israel, Judea, Gentiles, all nations) and not break His own decrees? (Esther). His plan of redemption, His reconciliation of His bride allowing the old marriage covenant to be concluded allowing a new covenant to be entered into--these are the solution. We (me included) struggle with our identity, our actions, etc., when maybe we should be a little more focused on God's plan of using us to be His witnesses and gather souls for His Kingdom.

Incorrect. You cannot inherit tribal identity if adopted 👌. Nor can you demonstrate such in tanakh

"We have been made Joint heirs with Christ"

They did not embrace the term, they called themselves the natsarim- the branches. It’s Catholicism mixed with Judaism that puts these things into our texts

@@CleanlinessisGodliness Who is really teaching “Replacement Theology” ? (Did God fulfill His promises to the Jewish people at Calvary? Matthew 26:28, John 19:30) The advocates of modern Dispensational Theology often accuse others of promoting “Replacement Theology”, or some may even say “Antisemitism”. What does the Bible say about their accusations? 1. Who is replacing Christ as the seed of Abraham through which all the families of the Earth would be blessed in Genesis 12:3, with Abraham’s modern descendants? (See what Paul said in Galatians 3:8) 2. Who is replacing the one people of God in John 10:16, with two peoples of God ? 3. Who is replacing the one seed (Christ) in Galatians 3:16, with the many seeds? 4. Who is replacing the children of the promise in Romans 9:8, with the children of the flesh? 5. Who is replacing the faithful “remnant” of Israelites in Romans 11:1-5, with the Baal worshipers? 6. Who is replacing the word "so" in Romans 11:26, with the word "then"? 7. Who is attempting to replace the Church made up of all races of people, with one made up only of Gentiles? Why did Peter address the crowd as “all the house of Israel” in Acts 2:36, when about 3,000 Israelites accepted Christ on the Day of Pentecost? 8. Based on Hebrews 9:15, the New Covenant cannot be separated from the Messiah’s death. Is the covenant in Daniel 9:27 connected to the Messiah’s death in Daniel 9:26. Is the covenant with the “many” in Daniel 9:27 the same covenant with the “many” in Matthew 26:28? If it is, some have replaced the New Covenant in Daniel 9:27 with a future covenant made by an antichrist not found in Daniel chapter 9. (See the 1599 Geneva Bible used by the Pilgrims.) 9. Those promoting the Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology often accuse others of teaching “Replacement Theology”, but are they the masters of it? Are they promoting a form of Dual Covenant Theology based on race? (See “genealogies” in Titus 3:9) Is the most important genealogy in the Bible found in Matthew 1:1? Is God's Son the ultimate fulfillment of Israel? Why has the modern Church done a pitiful job of sharing the Gospel with modern Orthodox Jews? Why would someone tell them they are God's chosen people and then fail to share the Gospel with them? Who is the seed of the woman promised in Genesis 3:15? Who is the "son" in Psalm 2? Who is the "suffering servant" of Isaiah 53? Who would fulfill the New Covenant promised in Jeremiah 31:31-34? Who would fulfill the timeline of Daniel chapter 9 before the second temple was destroyed? Why have we not heard this simple Old Testament Gospel preached on Christian television in the United States on a regular basis? 10. Watch the KZfaq video “Genesis of Dispensational Theology” to see the origin of this man-made doctrine, which is less than 200 years old. It was brought to the United States about the time of the Civil War by John Nelson Darby. The doctrine was later incorporated into the notes of the Scofield Reference Bible, and then spread through much of the modern Church. Dallas Theological Seminary in Dallas Texas was created in part to promote John Darby’s Two Peoples of God doctrine of Dispensational Theology. Lewis Sperry Chafer, the first president of Dallas Theological, had the following to say about the difference between Israel and the Church: “The dispensationalist believes that throughout the ages God is pursuing two distinct purposes: one related to the earth with earthly people and earthly objectives involved which is Judaism; while the other is related to heaven with heavenly people and heavenly objectives involved, which is Christianity.” Lewis Sperry Chafer, Dispensationalism (Dallas, Seminary Press, 1936), p. 107. Chafer states that, ‘Israel is an eternal nation, heir to an eternal land, with an eternal kingdom, on which David rules from an eternal throne,’ that is, on earth and distinct from the church who will be in heaven.” Lewis Sperry Chafer. Systematic Theology. 1975. Vol. IV. pp. 315-323. John Walvoord, another prominent voice of Dallas Theological stated… "...it is an article of normative dispensational belief that the boundaries of the land promised to Abraham and his descendants from the Nile to the Euphrates will be literally instituted and that Jesus Christ will return to a literal and theocratic Jewish kingdom centred on a rebuilt temple in Jerusalem. In such a scheme the Church on earth is relegated to the status of a parenthesis.” John F. Walvoord, The Rapture Question.1979, p. 25 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Are there two peoples of God in John 10:16? (See also 1 John 2:22-23, 2 John 1:7-11.) What is the land promise to the Old Testament Saints in Hebrews 11:15-16? Based on 2 Peter 3:10-13, is this earth “eternal”? Will it be replaced by a new earth? Based on Acts 2:36, and Romans 9:6-8, and Romans 11:1-5, and Hebrews 12:22-24, and James 1:1-3, can faithful Israel and the Church be separated into two different groups? Who is the New Covenant promised to in Jeremiah 31:31-34, and Hebrews 8:6-13? Will modern Orthodox Jews ever be saved outside of the New Covenant Church?

@@CleanlinessisGodliness haven't replaced anything. It was always there to understand

@@CleanlinessisGodliness You are ignoring the word "now" in Hebrews 8:6-13, which quotes Jeremiah 31:31-34 word for word and shows its fulfillment during the first century. Jer_31:31 "Behold, the days are coming, says the LORD, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah- Mat_26:28 For this is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many for the remission of sins. Mar_14:24 And He said to them, "This is My blood of the new covenant, which is shed for many. Luk_22:20 Likewise He also took the cup after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in My blood, which is shed for you. 1Co_11:25 In the same manner He also took the cup after supper, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in My blood. This do, as often as you drink it, in remembrance of Me." 2Co_3:6 who also made us sufficient as ministers of the new covenant, not of the letter but of the Spirit; for the letter kills, but the Spirit gives life. Heb_8:8 Because finding fault with them, He says: "BEHOLD, THE DAYS ARE COMING, SAYS THE LORD, WHEN I WILL MAKE A NEW COVENANT WITH THE HOUSE OF ISRAEL AND WITH THE HOUSE OF JUDAH- Heb_8:13 In that He says, "A NEW COVENANT," He has made the first obsolete. Now what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away. Heb_9:15 And for this reason He is the Mediator of the new covenant, by means of death, for the redemption of the transgressions under the first covenant, that those who are called may receive the promise of the eternal inheritance. Heb_12:24 to Jesus the Mediator of the new covenant, and to the blood of sprinkling that speaks better things than that of Abel.

If Jesus is Israel, and someone claims we are Israel as did the teacher in this video, they're claiming to be Jesus. Not only is that error, it's blasphemy.

@@bj6875 how is quoting the Bible blasphemous. Israel is from God. It went to Jacob, then to the Jews then to Jesus. Whomever believe in Jesus are accounted for Israel. God said he would always protect Israel. That's not Palestine. But it is the church. The ekklesia. The called out. Israel has always been spiritual not physical. It's in your Bible. Israel means "prince of God". Israel are the believers in Christ. When we die.are we not covered by Christs blood and finishing work? Does God see our good works or does he see Jesus sacrifice? Jesus is Israel.

It doesn’t make them jealous. The fact that we are joint heirs to the promises of God and eternal life through Christ is what makes them jealous. They can still sacrifice and feast all they want but without Christ they receive no blessing and hell will be their reward…. Well I guess they can’t really sacrifice without a temple so it’s hard to practice Judaism but I digress.

@@griffinturner5046 and those things shows your ignorance of the Torah which I'm not surprised

@@robertpoddam1889 care to explain?

Another outstanding teaching Professor Solberg! I’m grateful for your ministry and these videos! Thank you!

@@griffinturner5046 animal sacrafices are not just for sin atonement.

I'll check it out! RLS

Dr?

Hi, Fringez. "You know that when you were pagans you were led astray to mute idols, however you were led." 1 Cor 12:2. RLS

​@@TheBiblicalRootsso we're no longer gentiles?

In this age Paul makes known the mystery that the Gentiles are the same body and partakers of the promises, by being in Christ by the gospel Eph 3:6. This seems still mysterious to many.