Crank length is a complicated but very important and interesting part of riding a bike. For decades, riders have been sold cranks too long for them, and if you haven't changed yet, consider doing it NOW!!!
Пікірлер: 11
@jonathanwoo65972 ай бұрын
You nailed it! That's also been my experience. It's easier to push on the pedals with shorter cranks. I'm 170cm tall with a 80cm inseam. I'm running 155s (down from 170).
@squiresuzuki2 ай бұрын
Downsides: higher center of gravity from the saddle height increase (though tbf could theoretically be fine with lower bb), which at 188cm and going from 175mm to 165mm I really noticed. And for the same bar drop you would need to add spacers. Also, MA decreases so you need a larger cassette to get the same low gearing
@CyclespeedTours2 ай бұрын
Good points. For me, it's just 2.5mm we're talking about so any differences are small. Extra saddle to bar drop is a good thing to have aerowise. True, re. the MA, but I didn't notice any difference with my 2.5mm, and my lowest gear is still low enough.
@jonathanwoo65972 ай бұрын
By opening up the hip angles you're able to rotate the hips forward to flatten your back. By going shorter I found that my bar setup needed to go lower, not higher, which is very counterintuitive. The aero benefits are huge and one of the most underrated benefits of going shorter.
@BMD8Ай бұрын
being 188cm tall (6'2." roughly) I started with 177.5 cranks and reduced to 175 over time, but honestly wouldn't go smaller than this already. My inseam is just very slightly north of mean measurement for my height.
@MrSzwarz2 ай бұрын
I also changed from 172.5 to 170mm, and feel much more comfortable and relaxed on S size frame (TIME 2023), gone from M frame size to S (Focus Cayo). However longer crank arms give a better leverage, try open door pushing where is door handle, and midway of the door width. However 3-5mm will not make such difference, except feel of comfort.
@CyclespeedTours2 ай бұрын
Nice! Maybe consider moving to 167.5 or 165, depending on your inseam.
@varfolomeev_d2 ай бұрын
Hey! What about comparacing with Ostro V1? I have one and I love it. But found it a little bit heavy for climbing. Now I think about buying the new O2 VAM to have 2 bikes. Then I found you videos about SL8 and think that probably I should just switch from Ostro to this "one bike to rule them all". What do you think? What do you like most against ostro? Do you feel the huge gap between them?
@CyclespeedToursАй бұрын
The V1 is a great bike, but the SL8 is just a touch better in all departments except aero. But yes, the SL8 is the almost perfect do it all bike.
@steveng51072 ай бұрын
I definitely see your point and I agree. With shorter cranks you make more revolutions per minute which in turn increases your power output.
@CyclespeedTours2 ай бұрын
It's easier to spin fast (or faster), yes, which is necessary to compensate for the loss of torque (assuming your leg force stays the same).