Thailand’s Auto Export Problem

  Рет қаралды 120,813

Asianometry

Asianometry

Күн бұрын

In 2019, Thailand exported nearly half a million cars worth over $9 billion.
They are the 17th largest automotive exporter in the world. The third largest in Asia, and the biggest in Southeast Asia.
Yet the country's success in building and exporting cars and car parts has largely gone under the radar. And that is for a specific reason.
In this video, we are going to talk about how Thailand developed and nurtured an automotive export industry. And why it might not have turned out as successful as desired.
Links:
- The Asianometry Newsletter: asianometry.com
- Patreon: / asianometry
- The Podcast: anchor.fm/asianometry
- Twitter: / asianometry

Пікірлер: 260
@Asianometry
@Asianometry 2 жыл бұрын
Hope you enjoyed the video.
@nidhinv8406
@nidhinv8406 2 жыл бұрын
Could you do a video about Indian automotive industry @asianometry
@DeathRain2456
@DeathRain2456 2 жыл бұрын
Do you make these videos for fun?
@navsenjoy
@navsenjoy 2 жыл бұрын
Ah...something I can understand 😊
@Cineenvenordquist
@Cineenvenordquist 2 жыл бұрын
There were lots of facts and history but I feel like you didn't stick a pin in Thailand's brain drain problem in the end, and I hope you can mark up your script for overall texture and color in some quick pass to give the readings some more texture.
@jonaspete
@jonaspete 2 жыл бұрын
You should take the current Thailand political climate into equation. Most university graduated are leaving the country because of the current military junta gvt. Japan even predicted that Thailand would be stagnated and fall many years behind development.
@JakobFischer60
@JakobFischer60 2 жыл бұрын
From the first slide you can see that the former Czechoslovakia, if they would have stayed together, would export almost as many cars as the USA. Incredible.
@jmiquelmb
@jmiquelmb 2 жыл бұрын
While it's very remarkable for such small countries, there's some elements to have in mind. First, it's not that surprising that there's so many European countries in the top list, since the European economy is very integrated. Germany or Spain can export tons of cars because they have economic partners next to their borders. By contrast, most of the US production must be oriented to their own market, since their close neighbors are just Mexico and Canada (which have similar export volumes, probably directed to the US market). If we considered US production by states, I'm pretty sure Ohio would be pretty high, since it's a major automobile center. Second, Checoslovaquia is located in a pretty privileged region from an economical standpoint, specially Czequia. They're very close to Germany, they're fairly developed countries with lower wages, so they're very attractive for German automakers to move production there. In fact, that's pretty much the reason why my country (Spain) became a major automobile center: they were a developing economy in the 60s, so German, Italian and French industries invested here due to lower costs. Now that the Iron Curtain fell, it's Eastern and Central Europe the one receiving foreign investment
@hazmanriess8949
@hazmanriess8949 2 жыл бұрын
Investor was from Germany. They bring along new technology.
@_Alfa.Bravo_
@_Alfa.Bravo_ 2 жыл бұрын
... into the eastblock ?
@lkrnpk
@lkrnpk 2 жыл бұрын
Yet Slovakia's economy has not benefited that much from it, most likely because it's just assembly of foreign brands with little added value. A country that does not assemble cars for example Estonia, but instead have more IT startups and smaller scale higher tech local companies, is more wealthy in comparison
@mmkuyt
@mmkuyt 8 ай бұрын
i prefer a czech car over an american one any time
@-TheLynx-
@-TheLynx- 2 жыл бұрын
As a European (Norwegian), I find this channel to be a goldmine of highly interesting content. As I find there to be a lack of content explaining Asia's situation in the modern times. I frankly had little knowledge of the massive Thai export of cars, only knowing about the Hard-drive manufacturing, so this is great content!
@sayamalu2495
@sayamalu2495 Жыл бұрын
Yup, if you understand truly about Asian industry, especially about their “family industry” this kind of videos shouldn’t raise any eyebrows in open-market industry
@kenoliver8913
@kenoliver8913 Жыл бұрын
One wrinkle you do not mention in this is that Thailand is Right Hand Drive like Australia, Japan, India, Britain, New Zealand, Hong Kong, and South Africa. It's the reason the Japanese firms were the initial investors. And is also the reason Australia and NZ are the main export markets for Thai-built cars. But it also meant they lost their GM factories when GM decided a decade ago to abandon all RHD markets to simplify platform design.
@youcantata
@youcantata 2 жыл бұрын
Auto industry of South Korea was not far from that of Thailand in 70's and 80's. But it started making its own car 1980's, own engine 1990's, and hit 1 million car export a year mark in 2000's. Now 5-th car exporter country by dollar value. It took 40+ years from typical third world local auto industry like Thailand to world class car exporter. One notable difference between SK and Thailand is that SK has single big local car maker with its own brand, Hyndai group. Lesson to learn: Economy of scale is very important in auto industry. Merge small local car makers into single big company to consolidate strength to compete in world market.
@jparsit
@jparsit 2 жыл бұрын
Thai gov't know that but they want to keep people stupid and poor, so it easy to control and corrupt. Thailand very good at that. The world must change it way of life before environment collape. Thank to COVID-19 but corruption continue in drug and vaccine makers from the west.
@MrWongnawa
@MrWongnawa 2 жыл бұрын
I think one other major reason is that Thailand also lacks upstream steel industry, which is crucial to building engines and car body. Even til this day, Thailand still has no steel mills. Hyundai already started in heavy industries since the 50s before deciding to expand into auto industry.
@poppinc8145
@poppinc8145 Жыл бұрын
Another difference between Thailand and South Korea is that ROK transitioned from dictatorship to democracy between the late 1980s and early 1990s, as did Taiwan. Thailand has been going back and forth between military dictatorship and semi-democracy since 1932 when a coup got rid of absolute monarchism in favor of ceremonial monarchism. Thailand has been mostly run by military juntas in their modern history. Now in the 21st century their military is very close to China, buying most of their weapons from it.
@krrk6337
@krrk6337 Жыл бұрын
Malaysia has done that but didn't work out because it didn't have the power of Chaebol to make it work.
@DrRussell
@DrRussell 2 жыл бұрын
Love how you analyse such diverse aspects of industry!
@arthas640
@arthas640 2 жыл бұрын
As someone who's family is half Thai I'd wager geography, urbanization, cultural ties, and price are all big contributors: Thailand is located near the South China Sea which has one of the most valuable shipping corridors on Earth with trade passing between Africa, Europe, India, East Asia, and the Western half of the Americas, plus Thailand is only a short distance from China and Vietnam, both large manufactures of Automobile parts. They're near Japan and South Korea, both major manufacturers. This means its easier to ship parts in and vehicles out and also means they're likely to farm out very labor intensive tasks to nearby Thailand. Thailand is also a highly urbanized country with a massive 14 million people (over 20% of the country) living in the Bangkok metro zone which is also right on the water allowing easy importing and exporting of goods, and a highly urbanized population also means much easier manufacturing and having most of the country in 1 giant city means its easy to have multiple different companies making and assembling parts, sections, or entire vehicles. You dont need to make the chassis in Chicago, the engine in Houston, and send them to Detroit for assembly, you can keep different jobs in one city if it has most of the population there. That city also being a massive port on a massive shipping lane makes things even easier. Urbanized populations are also more well educated then more rural ones making things easier. Thailand also has very close ties to the US and they have close business/trading ties to China, South Korea, and Japan. This makes it even easier to get contracts to assemble vehicles for them or manufacture parts. The fact Thailand has close ties to China and the US also means they have large markets to sell to as well as import parts from. The cultural ties also means that there are more personal relationships and business is easier, plus tons of Thai people speak English or Chinese as a second language which makes doing business even more attractive. Another important factor is that costs are low in Thailand. Thanks to the shipping lanes transport costs are low, their location near resources like Chinese or Australian coal, locally made rubber, oil from the South China Sea, and Chinese and Japanese steel means resources are cheap as well. The fact that cost of living is very low and wages are also fairly low means that its cheap to do business in Thailand. Countries like South Korea and Japan can hire fairly well educated Thai people to do jobs for much less then doing it locally, and they have the benefits i already mentioned rolled in. They dont need to go to Africa where wages are low but geography makes business more difficult and where politics makes things less stable. A less important, but still important factor is also stability. Thailand despite all their coups is still fairly stable for doing business. New regimes dont like to "rock the boat" or institute wide ranging changes to society. The new regimes arent revolutionary and they dont want to radically change the countries allegiances or become isolated. New regimes usually just want to be the new leaders of the same basic government, they keep doing business with the same nations, keep local business going as normal, they dont try to nationalize tons of companies or force out certain businesses, and they dont demand radical changes to existing contracts or relationships. They also try to keep corruption manageable as well and try to keep Thailand an attractive trading partner. Compare this to some Arab or African nations where new regimes institute massive changes to their relationships or try to nationalize tons of business, or compare it to communist and socialist revolutionaries where the new regime seizes control of businesses and radically change society. Unpredictable politics like that make doing business less attractive and in complicated, global, heavily integrated industries like automotive
@herihazril
@herihazril 2 жыл бұрын
A tons of Thai's speak English? Are u making a joke? I've been to Thailand before.. and guess what, it's hard to find anyone can speak english.. almost none.. very few people who can speak english.. language barrier is a thing in Thailand..
@MrRAShelley
@MrRAShelley 2 жыл бұрын
That's quite a reply...but I have to tell you that for the past 4 years, trade passage through the South China Sea has continually diminished. I look out my windows and see a large enough swath of it to be sure of that. So many factors involved here...I won't bore you with the many reasons that you've already seen on TV. I'll just say that it is not a focal point for Southeast Asian development anymore, but merely a broad border between economic competitors. The China-Laos railroad and extensions to it may well prove to be a better facility to regional and international trade in the future.
@cyzcyt
@cyzcyt 2 жыл бұрын
Malaysia's former long time PM Dr. Mahathir's Proton automobile industry went the opposite direction. They wanted to become a regional production powerhouse, but ended up not being to export anything, neither were they able to develop indigenous R&D; even with partnership with Mitsubishi over the 90s and 2000s. mostly because they were super protective of the local market. Failed to compete with Thailand to attract more FDI. and continued to fight among themselves over who owns the profit of the national champion. In the end, Proton had to sell 49.9% of ownership to the Chinese Geely ending much of the debate of keeping all the ownership locally.
@shreyvaghela3963
@shreyvaghela3963 2 жыл бұрын
Indigenous car companies plus ecports are what's needed for higher productivity and good gdp growth look at korea
@AnalogueKid2112
@AnalogueKid2112 2 жыл бұрын
This was a really interesting video, thanks!
@miinyoo
@miinyoo 2 жыл бұрын
This is quickly becoming one of my favorite channels. Lots of interesting stuff that no one else talks about without hyperbole.
@yokogoph
@yokogoph 2 жыл бұрын
I feel bad that the Philippines missed out because of poor infrastructure and lack of care from the government. If I remember correctly lots of brand pulled out factories and/or models to be built in Thailand.
@azuaraikrezeul1677
@azuaraikrezeul1677 2 жыл бұрын
you love people power so much? why would you complain of foreigners pulling out.
@yootoober2009
@yootoober2009 2 жыл бұрын
@@azuaraikrezeul1677 "i feel bad for" does not equate to complaining, empathy is more like it... take a remedial critical reading class..
@azuaraikrezeul1677
@azuaraikrezeul1677 2 жыл бұрын
@@yootoober2009 empathy for losing jobs and livelihood all for the sake of idiocracy. good job at least we know were your priorities at.
@f.j.tuazon2122
@f.j.tuazon2122 2 жыл бұрын
Lee Kuan Yew described the Philippines as wanting and having too much freedom. "Freedom to go hungry, freedom to be poor, freedom to be victims of crimes". He even offered to be an adviser for Cory Aquino when she became the president, pro bono in which he was turned down. The Philippines squandered a lot of opportunities due to it's so called local entrepreneurs who always want to keep foreign competitors away in the name of nationalism. That has been detrimental to the development of the Phil economy in general.
@azuaraikrezeul1677
@azuaraikrezeul1677 2 жыл бұрын
@@f.j.tuazon2122 local entrepreneurs who leeched of govenrment subsidies and achieved absolutlely nothing! let the chinese buy all of the GOCC's at least they know how run and operate it. filipino talent. what a load bull crap that is.
@fourtoes412
@fourtoes412 Жыл бұрын
Excellent content, really enjoyed watching this video!
@StefanBacon
@StefanBacon 2 жыл бұрын
I love my Thai car. it was cheap, it has been reliable so far. I'm around 135,000km and some of my exhaust has rusted through and fallen off, but the car still drives and passes emissions.
@anthonyyoung6489
@anthonyyoung6489 2 жыл бұрын
You have a knack for choosing interesting subject matter.
@cheuk-yanau4283
@cheuk-yanau4283 2 жыл бұрын
The conclusion for the thai car industry is extremely relatable for singapore also. Singapore did not leverage enough on their investment and very little indigenous tech scene
@Ccb88888
@Ccb88888 2 жыл бұрын
Yes- completely right- for all the infrastructure development, I do not know of any world-renowned-Singaporean company doing construction abroad like Hyundai, Daewoo, Skandia, NCC, Bouygues etc.. Nor do I know of any world-renowned Singapore firms doing architecture, engineering consultants like Arup, Mott Macdonald, Tractebel, Foster & Partners, COWI. Nor do I know of any world-renowned Singapore law or accountancy firms.
@davidjacobs8558
@davidjacobs8558 Жыл бұрын
@@Ccb88888 Singapor is a city state. you can't expect too much from their limited territory and limited population. for example, in order to have modern automobile industry, you need to have at least 50 million population in your country. Australia had to give up their auto industry, because they simply do not have enough population to draw talents.
@lzh4950
@lzh4950 Жыл бұрын
@@Ccb88888 Closest I can think of is Chip Eng Seng Contractors branching out into property development (with a subsidiary called CEL Development which I think might own some properties overseas), as well as shipbuilding & oil rig builders e.g. SembCorp, Keppel that have business worldwide. Both of them are government linked, as is Surbana, which did the architecture designs of some public housing in Singapore, & I think the planned (but now cancelled) design of the new state capital of the newly created state of Telangana in India. Though its true that Singapore's economic policy has focussed more of making ourselves attractive to foreign investment, not just by giving tax incentives & subsidies, but aligning its education system to the economy's needs, & having friendly industrial relations
@poppinc8145
@poppinc8145 Жыл бұрын
Singapore does not have the resources to support a domestic car production scene wtf. Where are the steel mines and rubber plantations? Where's the massive pool of labor and domestic market? Comparing the two is the most insane thing I've heard. All Singapore would have done is import the materials to make into car parts, or import the car parts to assemble into cars. It would have hurt the economy long-term far worse, and potentially lead to an economic crash because a business model like that isn't profitable. There's a lot of back and forth shipping involved with that model which is unsustainable because it would make the SG car industry both slow and expensive, as well as entirely dependent on other suppliers.
@sdprz7893
@sdprz7893 2 жыл бұрын
I love your industrial policy videos, more of these please
@Asianometry
@Asianometry 2 жыл бұрын
Would love to, though this one isn't doing so well right now.
@ffls2706
@ffls2706 2 жыл бұрын
@@Asianometry at least make some time to time
@valopf7866
@valopf7866 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video!
@terrywilkinson1570
@terrywilkinson1570 2 жыл бұрын
Yet another well researched and delivered article. Uk.
@epiccat9740
@epiccat9740 2 жыл бұрын
best up and coming channel around.
@spongeotakuph
@spongeotakuph 2 жыл бұрын
Good thing you mentioned Thai Rung, the maker of the TR Transformer SUV. The only thing you forgot is the Chaiseri military vehicles.
@chickenwings273
@chickenwings273 2 жыл бұрын
Can you ever make a video about Indonesia, it's literally an invisible country on the world stage given its size both in economy and population.
@monnezzapromizoulin5169
@monnezzapromizoulin5169 2 жыл бұрын
Thank you for your analyse. Could you make a subject on Vietnam ?
@KOTYAR1
@KOTYAR1 11 ай бұрын
Love the asianometry
@emmettturner9452
@emmettturner9452 2 жыл бұрын
No mention of Thailand’s motorcycle production? My 2008 Kawasaki Ninja 250 EX250J came from Thailand. The 2007 Kawasaki Ninja 250 EX250F model came from there too, which is weird since they had to spool up a factor to produce a 20 year old model for one year only. You did mentioned the Honda City which was sold with a stow-able scooter that fits in the hatch but that’s a huge collector’s items now. ;) I believe Honda makes their CBR250/300 motorcycle in Thailand today.
@jackyex
@jackyex 2 жыл бұрын
How interesting the situation of Auto Exports in Thailand is almost the same as the one in Brazl, the modern situation also, both countries are big auto exporters but don't have any big native brand, also both governments had protectionist policies until a new goverment took power and opened its economy. There's also much more similarities between this sector of both countries economy very interesting.
@jeremytan1650
@jeremytan1650 Жыл бұрын
Appreciate the video. It is hard work. Shall possible, do as well do Indonesia Automotive. Thanks.
@lord_of_love_and_thunder
@lord_of_love_and_thunder 2 жыл бұрын
I think a broader video as to why Thailand could never exit the middle income trap despite good economic growth and great social indices would be great. This was the only major Asian country apart from Japan that did not come under serious Western political influence. Executing large infrastructure projects (for example railways) seems like its a big problem across SE Asia, and it could be a major reason for economic under performance.
@jparsit
@jparsit 2 жыл бұрын
Wrong, Thailand is totally the US puppet influencing Thai low I.Q for over a century.
@lord_of_love_and_thunder
@lord_of_love_and_thunder 2 жыл бұрын
@@jparsit The US majorly influenced the Japanese constitution, it has bases in Japan and South Korea, massive influence on Taiwan. They are all developed economies.
@AmanKumarPadhy
@AmanKumarPadhy 2 жыл бұрын
'Low iq' sure mate
@fantared5263
@fantared5263 2 жыл бұрын
Corruption. The cancer that kills from within.
@kreek22
@kreek22 2 жыл бұрын
Thailand is middle IQ, therefore middle income. Aside from oil rich countries, middle IQ countries never escape the middle income trap.
@MrRAShelley
@MrRAShelley 2 жыл бұрын
Excellent analysis...I know, I was there throughout the period mentioned and was often a miniscule participant to some of what transpired. Your work is a bit light on the heavy weight of socioeconomic influences that often counted for more than all the boardroom maneuvering for profit and governmental thinktank planning to force the birth of an indigenous Thai car industry. Nevertheless, it is an excellent historical synopsis.
@HellishPestilence
@HellishPestilence 2 жыл бұрын
Exporting foreign branded cars doesn't condemn Thailand to the middle income trap, especially when most parts are made by domestic companies. Your graph at 11:39 shows how successful Thai car exports are. If the entire Thai industry had developed as well as its car industry, it would be a high income country now. So why has the rest done so badly when automotive did so well?
@jonaspete
@jonaspete 2 жыл бұрын
Because of stupid politicians and officials. The reason there is progress and development in business sector comes mainly from local private corporate influence.
@buzhichun
@buzhichun 2 жыл бұрын
​@@jonaspete How can you just assert this right below a video showing very clearly how essential government policy is in building up industries? If things were left to "local private corporate influence" Thailand would still be importing all its cars.
@jonaspete
@jonaspete 2 жыл бұрын
@@buzhichun it only focus on being a service provider for foreign manufacturer. This would be an advantage to learn from the foreign technology just like what Taiwan did but it refused to support the incentive policy for its own indeginious brand development to manufacture and sell car to Thai people at a lower price instead it relies on the high excise tax from import car revenue. The gvt want to only focus on charging a high excise tax from the import car and those tax goes into gvt coffer which is not known to be transparent to public eyes. Matter of fact this tax revenue should be use to fund the local technology innovation, education and improving infrastructure to create a high wage population so the gvt wouldn't need to rely on the high excise import tax. However, the tax received seems to disappeared into the pocket of corrupt politicians and official, which also received the bribed from foreign car manufacturers to grant them incentive and concession. The royal budget is especially known for being secretive and cannot be check by the public and there are several scandals surrounding the people's tax being use to pay for royal luxury and businesses.
@jonaspete
@jonaspete 2 жыл бұрын
@@buzhichun ever heard of CP? Thai gvt always relies on CP for economic advice and economic policy. Which in the end favour the rich and big corporate business in avoiding tax and gain a controversial concession while the middle and lower suffer from the high tax rate. As a result the influencial local corporate grew in power and maintaining a relationship with junta military gvt. Thailand right now is basically a peaceful Nazi Germany.
@jparsit
@jparsit 2 жыл бұрын
@@jonaspete well said. you know the true.
@Ccb88888
@Ccb88888 2 жыл бұрын
It's one thing to develop indigenous science and technology capabilities, but quite another challenge to encourage technology transfer. Western and Japanese companies are increasingly unwilling to transfer technology to local companies just to get market access. Many companies have had their fingers burnt in China.
@MrWongnawa
@MrWongnawa 2 жыл бұрын
I still wish Thailand would have established 1-2 global car brands from this policy. Would have been a really big national pride. I hope that the next big shift to EVs can help Thailand move up the value chain and eventually establish a global Thai car brand. ICE cars are just so complex and hard to enter the market as a new brand.
@paanjang16
@paanjang16 2 жыл бұрын
Malaysia have 2 brands of cars: Proton and Perodua. Both enjoyed enormous subsidies and benefits. In the end one had gone through various relationships and settled with Geely, the other was married to Daihatsu from the beginning. Today both are best selling makes in their respective segments locally but does not have a big global presence. Establishing a global brand is hard even with all the help a first born can get.
@sidewinder3422
@sidewinder3422 2 жыл бұрын
@@paanjang16 Makes me appreciate South Korea even more, they were able to establish multiple global brands in different industries through enormous government support.
@MrAdhito
@MrAdhito 2 жыл бұрын
@@sidewinder3422 Yea, it's quite insane how South Korea pull it of especially their electronic industries
@ferryansetyadi7192
@ferryansetyadi7192 2 жыл бұрын
@@MrAdhito just like China
@ferryansetyadi7192
@ferryansetyadi7192 2 жыл бұрын
@@sidewinder3422 just like China
@sutherlandA1
@sutherlandA1 Жыл бұрын
In 2005 Australia and Thailand arranged a free trade agreement so they could export their 4X4s to us tariff free but when we tried to export Australian made cars they slapped on a 30% tariff, very unfair but at least we have a cheap holiday destination I suppose
@poppinc8145
@poppinc8145 Жыл бұрын
And Australia took that like a fool? Either slap tariffs on their vehicles on the same grounds, or slap tariffs on other sectors. Thailand is run by a military dictatorship so why have an FTA with them anyways.
@htomerif
@htomerif 2 жыл бұрын
I wonder how Thailand's automotive production and export ecosystem compares with India's. I noticed that India wasn't on that list of Thai car exports anywhere. From what I know about Tata Motors, they've been edging out a lot of competition in India for the small car, small truck and especially EV market. (I did a little reading. I guess they have some substantial presence in Thailand. I don't know how it compares to the Japanese presence)
@MrWongnawa
@MrWongnawa 2 жыл бұрын
Tata Motors barely exists in Thailand. They have been there over 10 years but failed to compete with the Japanese brands. They tried to get into the truck market but their truck just look older compared to Japanese brands. In general Thai people are very loyal to Japanese car brands, even Hyundai, Kia, Chevrolet had trouble expanding their market here.
@htomerif
@htomerif 2 жыл бұрын
@@MrWongnawa Its always difficult (for me at least) to keep an eye on what Tata Group has influence over. They own so many things and have their fingers in so many more pies. I know some joint ventures exist between Japanese companies and Tata. I would suspect if they want a part of Thailand's automotive industry (probably as a means to gain influence in Thailand's exports to Australia) it won't be a direct attempt to produce vehicles in Thailand, but as a joint venture between Tata and one of the trailing Japanese companies. I don't understand, but I've seen the corporate loyalty in Japan at least. When you've seen an entire parking garage full of the same make, model and color of car, and its not even a company that has anything to do with cars, it puts corporate loyalty in places like the US in perspective. Of course corporate loyalty goes both ways in Japan. In the US, a CEO would personally cut your throat and throw you in a ditch if it meant their stock would go up by a hundredth of a percent.
@fleurdewin7958
@fleurdewin7958 2 жыл бұрын
@@MrWongnawa Hi , I'm from Malaysia. I think Ford stands a chance against the Japanese brands in terms of pickup trucks. Ford Ranger is not bad. Chevrolet deserves to be deserted here in south east Asia. Their only pickup truck here is the 2.8L turbo diesel Colorado which is an Isuzu is okay. But the cars, they are absolute crap. GM decided to bring in GM Korea stuff which is rebadged Daewoo into south east Asian market , they are junk , trying to con us believing that it is an American car. Only the badge is Chevy, but the car is Korean Daewoo.
@MrWongnawa
@MrWongnawa 2 жыл бұрын
@@fleurdewin7958 Yes, I agree. Ford is thriving in Thailand mainly because of the Ranger and Everest. They tried with Fiesta, Focus but ran into quality control issues which gave them a really bad reputation in Thailand but their trucks still has really cool American image that Thai people aspire too. I hope that they would re-introduce their passenger cars again in the future.
@nuzlockstarter5345
@nuzlockstarter5345 2 жыл бұрын
It's because most of whatever is sold in Indian market is manufactured here itself. Especially with the Make in India push there is less chance of importing cars for sale in India.
@manishkumar_jee19
@manishkumar_jee19 2 жыл бұрын
Nice video....also made a video on indian auto industry.
@yongo1234
@yongo1234 2 жыл бұрын
Info share. CKD means completely knock down for assembly units. CBU completely built up ready for showroom sale
@jochenschrey2909
@jochenschrey2909 2 жыл бұрын
I wish you had explained why the Thai-Honda bikes I 'd like to buy are in so short supply world wide.
@cruiseshipdreamer7003
@cruiseshipdreamer7003 2 жыл бұрын
Thailand sharing 50% of a 100% is still a success. Sometimes trying to get 100% success never works.
@abmong
@abmong 4 ай бұрын
I've seen interviews with the current Thai Prime Minister Srettha Thavisin on the developement of domestic auto-industry. Apparently it is intentional policy not to subsidize/support domestic brands so as to allay fears that Thailand might become another China in IP theft. In this way Thailand hopes to attract more FDI with the promise that investors will not need to worry about harsh proprietary technology transfer as part of the deal. So for now, Thailand (at least with the current government strategy) is settling to become a hub for factories, atleast where the auto-industry is concerned. The focus for branding is on the country itself as a tourist destination.
@john-ic5pz
@john-ic5pz 28 күн бұрын
Belgium had a significant car industry? I never would've guessed.
@hi4806
@hi4806 2 жыл бұрын
Due to the rise of electric vehicles, Thailand will face fierce competition from China, and China's automobile export competitiveness has surpassed Thailand.In 2021, China's car exports reached 2.015 million, more than double the 995000 in 2020. China's total vehicle exports exceeded 31 billion US dollars in 2021, which is likely to surpass that of Britain and Spain and is very close to South Korea. If it develops according to the existing situation, it is certain to surpass South Korea within three or two years. This means that 2-3 years later, the export competitiveness of Chinese cars can already rank behind the "three established automobile powers of Germany, Japan and the United States" (the fourth in the world).
@Myanmartiger921
@Myanmartiger921 2 жыл бұрын
I guess India will be behind at no 5 or 6
@PPOP-ws2fi
@PPOP-ws2fi 2 жыл бұрын
Not sure if that was the case since china’s 2 out of 5 largest automakers also build factories in Thailand for export. SAIC and Greatwall motors , very likely that more of them will follow
@ivankurnia6211
@ivankurnia6211 11 ай бұрын
As an Indonesian a lot of the problems with the Thailand automotive industry hits close home, especially considering that we are still behind Thailand in terms of export and sales output. Many local manufacturers have come and go because of stiff competition against Japanese manufacturers with decades of local market experience, the very few existing ones normally operate on much smaller, niche scale and you can hardly find their motor vehicle products on Indonesian roads.
@J_A22
@J_A22 Жыл бұрын
In this year, PPT (Thai Company) join with Foxconn(Taiwanese) will make EV Car in Thailand, plus other Thai companies already produce EV Bus, EV Boat, commercial Army Drone, Tank, Huge Ultra Battery Factory. Chinese Auto Car maker s like BYD, Great Wall Motor, EV primuse will set up the factories and produce in Thailand. Japanese Auto Car makers are a bit slow with EV Car Market.
@hunterkiller009
@hunterkiller009 2 жыл бұрын
The government not only doesn't support research funding, their authority figure also trying to halt any progress when someone has promising research project. Those project would either freezed due to lack of funding or continue inder other county's name because those researchers moved out of Thailand. Nowadays , it's very common to see top end of thai researchers work overseas for foreign country. Recently, due to lack of vision from the government, many thai middle classes also seek an opportunity to move out of Thailand as well.
@harukrentz435
@harukrentz435 2 жыл бұрын
thats what happen when you deal with japanese automotive brands, they want to completely dominated the market by killing domestic brands. same here in indonesia.
@juliancohen9561
@juliancohen9561 2 жыл бұрын
I really doubt countries can follow the East Asian model in the 2020's. We are seeing increasing automation, limiting the need and importance of cheap labour, especially for the most valuable industries like semiconductor manufacturing. Even if China ever becomes a so-called "high-income" country, by virtue of their large population there will always be a large enough pool of people willing and able to engage in mass manufacturing. Seeing as China has the best infrastructure, largest expertise, and economies of scale it will continue to be the world's factory unless something big changes (e.g. a West-China decoupling). Also, we are no longer living in the Golden Age of neoliberalism and offshoring that occurred between the 80's - 00's. With the increasing populism and protectionism in developed countries it's going to be harder to secure tech transfers for developing countries. Technology transfers like those of Philips into Taiwan would be a harder sell today. The days when CEOs could brazenly uproot entire industries from developed countries and move them to Mexico or Malaysia to save a couple dollars are waning. I believe most of SE Asia and Latin America will never exit the middle-income trap. In a world without China (or one in which China remained a closed North Korea-like state) other countries could've stepped up and filled that niche, but now that window has permanently closed in the foreseeable future. After experiencing the result of tech transfers, joint-ventures, and other shortsighted business practices most companies will not risk building their future competition in developing countries. It is not worth it. Add to that the fact that these markets are comparatively tiny (with the exception of India), why risk it?
@yanmak2363
@yanmak2363 2 жыл бұрын
I don't buy the argument that globalization/neo liberal trade is dead. The trend is shifted toward greater protectionism, but I think you miss the main reason these shifts happened in the 1st place. It was self interest that drove offshoring. Pre ww2 America had massive tariff barriers, it had to remove them when post war economies (Japan, Germany) were starting to eat it's lunch. Fear, competitiveness an self interest are the main motivators for globalization.
@jparsit
@jparsit 2 жыл бұрын
@@yanmak2363 Well said, we first need to see the real causes of globalization, like doctor must do to each patient. Globalization is a selfish self-interest drama for the rich under the poor slave wages. Drama continue until all people up rise as the world citizen, one governanace without borders.
@user-hs9xf2me4w
@user-hs9xf2me4w 2 жыл бұрын
Anti-china
@andro7862
@andro7862 2 жыл бұрын
You do raise a good point on how reaching developed status will be a much tougher climb for Vietnam than what it was for Taiwan, but never say never. If they make the right economic and political decisions, I don't see what will stop them from getting there eventually.
@henrycarlson7514
@henrycarlson7514 2 жыл бұрын
Interesting , Thank You . I did not realize that Thailand built Cars.
@herihazril
@herihazril 2 жыл бұрын
They r just making cars for foreign company..they don't even have their own local brand manufacturer..
@jannahjohnymuhammad9172
@jannahjohnymuhammad9172 2 жыл бұрын
CAN YOU MAKE ABOUT MALAYSIAN CARS INDUSTRIES.TQ
@pip07200
@pip07200 2 жыл бұрын
Thanks for the video and agree with this analysis about Thailand's inability to upgrade its manufacturing and industry, despite lots of FDI during the 80s through the 2000s. Simply, there hasn't been a sustained effort to promote local RnD, whether basic or applied research. Indeed, the education system is criticized for rote learning, and delivering poor results despite the long hours in class. This problem is known among policy makers for quite some time, but not much progress has been done due to political instability, and lack of vision among the political class. A political campaign which talks about RnD won't win votes, but guaranteeing the price of rice will. Nevertheless, we can always hope that the economic base of our country could be upgraded, if steered in the right direction.
@mythbusterUSA
@mythbusterUSA 2 жыл бұрын
Present Pakistan auto-industry is what Thiland auto industry was in 80's. Low localization, high tariffs, 100% foreign ownership.
@YouChube3
@YouChube3 2 жыл бұрын
How about a video teaching us how you approach research..? They say learning how to learn is a most valuable skill, you seem to have a knack for it. What’s your process?
@otikamporn
@otikamporn 2 жыл бұрын
In Thailand If you try to create something new or improve something to work better / more suitable than what avalible on the market. Then Thai people or Thai boss or policy maker will ask you ' why don't just buy'. Su we keep buying inovation and traped in the middle income.
@bertoneautomotive7172
@bertoneautomotive7172 Жыл бұрын
It will be very hard for Thailand to move up further because they are too reliant with foreign owned Companys. To really grow, you must develop your brand and products. The cost of the labor market is slowly increasing and there are many other countries that can offer cheaper labor than Thailand nowadays. Vietnam, Philippines, Myanmar, Bangladesh, Africa, etc etc have lower wages than Thailand nowadays. Philippines would amongst the top in the list because they have many very skilled labor and they can speak English well. In the next century, i can predict that Thailand automotive sector will suffer tremendously. They must check out their future automotive policies....
@mfx1
@mfx1 2 жыл бұрын
Very little is 100% locally made it either relies on imported parts/materials or equipment.
@SianaGearz
@SianaGearz 2 жыл бұрын
"climbing up the value chain" culminates at where you don't have to even manufacture anything per se, you just own stuff in poorer countries, where stuff gets made instead. But it is a long way to get there. "domestic manufacturing" breeds "domestic process engineering and design engineering experience", which eventually allows you to move post-industrial. End goal is not to manufacture, the less you manufacture and the more you control, the better.
@lumtavon1952
@lumtavon1952 2 жыл бұрын
Big risk is that Thailand will miss out on the EV change which will come for sure. All key producers in Thailand today are far behind. GM did leave and many electric pickup trucks are coming. They need a Tesla or LL what has been built up could be gone which would be a disaster! Going green is simply not a government goal and risk is Thailand will loose out. Hope they see the light
@dannyslea
@dannyslea 2 жыл бұрын
But who made all the Tuk Tuks?
@RoderickJMacdonald
@RoderickJMacdonald 2 жыл бұрын
Perhaps "many Latin American countries" would provide better precedents for import substitution than "Japan, Taiwan, Korea, and China" as these latter had economic policies geared to increased imports rather than supplying domestic consumption with domestic producers. And perhaps that is a better description of Thailand's ambitions. I always enjoy your work.
@Asianometry
@Asianometry 2 жыл бұрын
A lot of the East Asian tigers explicitly describe their early economic policies as being "import substitution" types. It's a first step.
@RoderickJMacdonald
@RoderickJMacdonald 2 жыл бұрын
@@Asianometry I must be missing something, such as a transitory period immediately after World War II. When I think of Japan's economic policies, I think of automobiles and electronics, not of rice. Similarly for Taiwan, Korea, Singapore and lately China: they protected industries, but with an eye to competing in global markets in some of those industries, not to supplying only domestic demand. Perhaps China could get away with long term import substitution in some industries because of its size.
@shreyvaghela3963
@shreyvaghela3963 2 жыл бұрын
@@Asianometry short term import substitution and long term export orientation.
@Diegallo90
@Diegallo90 10 ай бұрын
It looks like Mexico and Thailand are brothers in pain, both massive automovile export giants, big destinations for direct foreign investment but both failing to create their own first tier companies and escape the middle income trap
@alexlo7708
@alexlo7708 2 жыл бұрын
Thai automobile industries all belong to foreign investment. When US decided to promote others ASEAN countries, Japanese who owns all facilitate Thai automobile industries commited by stop invest in Thailand and move to target countries that American designated such Vietnam and Indonesia. So it is nothing Thai govt can do in this field.
@robertchen8297
@robertchen8297 Жыл бұрын
Taiwan did great, and similarly did Korea, Hong Kong, China and to some extent Singapore in terms of developing their own technological businesses with IP successes. The picture you showed of a former PM (now a fugitive criminal hiding in Dubai) was a former policeman turned monopolistic government mobile phone concession tycoon reaping commissions selling foreign technology and services to Thai people. Knowing little of technology, making simple commissions was a sure win. But after the big profits, he turned to politics to make bigger profits so the country never got any direct investment to develop organic IP businesses. This type of events occurred many times in Thailand so the organic technology sector never made it big in the world arena. It seems Thailand could only do well to supply valuable human capital to foreign companies that setup manufacturing bases in Thailand.
@Cotonetefilmmaker
@Cotonetefilmmaker 2 жыл бұрын
I had no idea Thailand had a military coup last decade!
@harukrentz435
@harukrentz435 2 жыл бұрын
thats their hobbies lol
@incremental_failure
@incremental_failure Жыл бұрын
What's the motive of foreign companies to participate? Thailand now faces competition from other ASEA countries. The technology transfer from west to east has been ongoing too long and we are heading into more protectionism in the west and it's understandable.
@JohnnieWalkerGreen
@JohnnieWalkerGreen 2 жыл бұрын
(11:27) How can you export MORE cars than they MADE?
@Armonia.
@Armonia. 2 жыл бұрын
I believe it was lack of sales from prior years and thus, they sold not just what was made for the year but also for the previous years.
@_Alfa.Bravo_
@_Alfa.Bravo_ 2 жыл бұрын
GM has sold its factories to SIAC or GWM chinese companies in Thailand !!! Same in India. It looks like US car industry has no future in Asia. ( Ford built a big factory but I think chin will simply beat them at price ).
@person.X.
@person.X. Жыл бұрын
Ford is still successful in Asia. You see Ford Rangers everywhere in Thailand and Australia and Fords are also very common in Vietnam.
@_Alfa.Bravo_
@_Alfa.Bravo_ Жыл бұрын
@@person.X. First is ISUZU, second TOYOTA , third MITSUBISHI , forth NISSAN. There are more and more MG. They give longer garantees cause they can. Ford can't. Their repair parts a way to expensive. Often defects on oilpump and injectors. No thanks. If you are in Asia, choose an asiab car.
@mememaster147
@mememaster147 2 жыл бұрын
They export motorbikes as well
@neildutton8077
@neildutton8077 2 жыл бұрын
Thai baht's value is artificially manipulated (achieving the opposite effect that the Chinese levy on the yuan).
@Mew178
@Mew178 2 жыл бұрын
Bangkok is now called Krung Thep Maha Nakhon lol
@expand9487
@expand9487 2 жыл бұрын
Intel just bought tower semi please cover this
@gallasebiyo4427
@gallasebiyo4427 2 жыл бұрын
Can you make a video about why Taiwan's auto industry is so weak?
@Aermydach
@Aermydach 2 жыл бұрын
Meanwhile in Australia. . . Oh, wait. We shut down all of our automobile manufacturing. . . Because of neoliberal ideology and we love flogging off dirt and houses.
@leacwpc
@leacwpc 2 жыл бұрын
still richer than thailand tho
@Aermydach
@Aermydach 2 жыл бұрын
@@leacwpc And more corrupt too! Source: FriendlyJordies (here on YT) - Scomo's Government: Most Corrupt Ever
@RK-cj4oc
@RK-cj4oc 2 жыл бұрын
@@leacwpc yeah but alot more dependent on other countries.
@cleanenergyinside1921
@cleanenergyinside1921 2 жыл бұрын
Now many car makers have also pulled out of Thailand and moved to Indonesia and Malaysia. Indonesia for the Japanese makes and Malaysia for the European makes.
@harukrentz435
@harukrentz435 2 жыл бұрын
indonesia export less than thai because their domestic market is already big.
@masternobody1896
@masternobody1896 2 жыл бұрын
You should talk about how Intel lost to tsmc
@johnl.7754
@johnl.7754 2 жыл бұрын
I think it was talked about in previous video.
@masternobody1896
@masternobody1896 2 жыл бұрын
@@johnl.7754 which video
@PlaylistWatching1234
@PlaylistWatching1234 2 жыл бұрын
@5:20. Measure what matters is really not good. What percentage of it is just John Doerr saying nice things about the companies he's invested in? It's wild.
@motorpolitan8884
@motorpolitan8884 Жыл бұрын
Thailand used to have a decent local brand called "Thairung" which was mostly a "coachbuilder" where they would get Thai-made Japanese pickup trucks and turn them into SUVs. This could've been a nice springboard into making their own car even if the engine was still sourced from other brands. However, when the Japanese brands started making their own SUVs based on the pickup trucks, Thairung just gave up. They still exist and still do coachbuilding stuff but nowhere near the scale as 20 years ago. Thairung's latest rebodied pickup trucks now are very ugly and nobody likes them.
@muhammadrayhanarifinsyah5834
@muhammadrayhanarifinsyah5834 Жыл бұрын
You should make an entire video on the Japanese's iron fist control towards their foreign partners, it is not mentioned enough on how much it stunts R&D in foreign countries
@Jackkalpakian
@Jackkalpakian Жыл бұрын
It is a great problem to have. The Middle Income Trap is not forever.
@SianaGearz
@SianaGearz 2 жыл бұрын
Huh it's almost like one better be careful what they wish for.
@Rovinman
@Rovinman 2 жыл бұрын
What happened to the Thai philosophy of 51% must be Thai owned for it's companies ?
@ThePhiphler
@ThePhiphler 2 жыл бұрын
Thailand would benefit from a more free market with greater respect for the rights of the individual, but this development is seemingly only used as a last resort. Governments are not capable of divining the correct industries and technologies to invest in, that should be left to the private investors who have skin in the game.
@shreyvaghela3963
@shreyvaghela3963 2 жыл бұрын
Loo no. Industrial policies are what's needed look at korea. Japan's miti. Without government companies have no intention to invest in industries that are not profitable. That's the reality
@RK-cj4oc
@RK-cj4oc 2 жыл бұрын
@@shreyvaghela3963 Those " goverment" companies in south korea where not led by the goverment. They were private companies given a blank cheque of support from the goverment as long as they kept growing.
@LawatheMEid
@LawatheMEid 2 жыл бұрын
I wonder if the industrial efforts for any country is a local genuine or part of a universal current? Syria as an example is a war region, no minimum genuine industry! Curse or stupidity?!!
@hazmanriess8949
@hazmanriess8949 2 жыл бұрын
Dont focusing on automobile industries if want to be rich and wealthy country. See what Ireland,Swissland, Belgium, Canada, Neitheland doing.
@shreyvaghela3963
@shreyvaghela3963 2 жыл бұрын
Lol dumb as hell. Those countries are small. Look at japan, korea, italy, germany etc. All those have big car companies. Car companies are highly productive and that's why are they good for economy.
@sleepyjoe4529
@sleepyjoe4529 2 жыл бұрын
Can you make a video on why China's auto industry is so...weak? in terms of exports
@SianaGearz
@SianaGearz 2 жыл бұрын
China is so rapidly growing that their industrial output gets easily absorbed domestically.
@WXRBL666
@WXRBL666 2 жыл бұрын
i don't think they don't even have the capacity to meet domestic demand yet, let alone mass export
@3ormorecharactersmaybe5
@3ormorecharactersmaybe5 2 жыл бұрын
From my viewpoint, most of China's auto companies currently in success started out as a copycat of other companies outside of China. Later on, with some pedigree of success, they successfully managed to buy other automobile makers instead of continuing their own. (See:Geely) So, IMO, China's success in the automobile industry doesnt really come from their exports, mainly due to the fact that they were either creating copies of other companies or their own bespoke ones are mostly equipped with older technologies.
@faisalzulkar9189
@faisalzulkar9189 2 жыл бұрын
Next.. How Malaysia Failed in Automobile Industry
@allergischaufdasrontgen7644
@allergischaufdasrontgen7644 2 жыл бұрын
Malaysia did Not fail, its doing good, Look at Proton x70 and x50 success
@mimimimeow
@mimimimeow 2 жыл бұрын
Malaysia did not fail. The automotive sector still thrives. What it failed at is establishing a solid global brand. Proton had everything in favor for them but no one dared enough to make a second push to western market.
@ntabile
@ntabile 2 жыл бұрын
Their engines are not locally produced. A certain portion is locally made. Some cars are just copy of foreign cars. Example: NAZA. Their cars are copied from KIA. Proton started with Mitsubishi, then with Lotus, or even now copied from China branded cars.
@Davyjones5454
@Davyjones5454 2 жыл бұрын
@@mimimimeow They dare not push because Proton built quality and design is lousy. Proton only won inside the country due to high tariffs and nothing else. Dare the Malaysian government make tariff and duty same for all cars assembled in Malaysia ?
@Davyjones5454
@Davyjones5454 2 жыл бұрын
Maybe also do one about our Malaysian AP system. That would be interesting
@yootoober2009
@yootoober2009 2 жыл бұрын
What happens to their car exports when ICE cars get banned everywhere?
@justinliu7357
@justinliu7357 2 жыл бұрын
9 billion dollars in the automotive sector is pocket change someone lost in the cushions
@mrsweeves7035
@mrsweeves7035 Жыл бұрын
True but the Thais made the right choice to partner with JOEMs in the auto industry. You have to learn from the master first and the Japanese make the best cars in terms of reliability and quality
@warntheidiotmasses7114
@warntheidiotmasses7114 Жыл бұрын
I agree, but they're really not learning anything by being the assembler of cars. You have to learn to design and manufacture everything yourself. I think they're doing that to a greater degree now, but still not enough to fully build a car. Let's not forget you have to start small to develop your engineering and manufacturing capability and skill. Honda started out with bicycles right? Then motorcycles and then cars, and Honda even went on to build planes but decided to not enter the market. Well then, Thailand should start with their own brand of bicycles and move up the food chain. Same concept in every industry. As an aside, big box retailers and large restaurant chains will destroy the Thai lower and middle class. Let's hope the government busts up any monopolies that may form in that area. Large food chains and big box retailers destroyed many entry level jobs and Mom an Pop businesses in the US. That aside aside, China has been chosen by the world government banksters to be the manufacturer to the world, and going forward it doesn't look like countries will be able to compete with China's near slave labor wages, lack of pollution regulations or labor laws, and ability to reverse engineer and copy anything and everything the smart Japanese and Germans ever created designed and manufactured. That high speed rail coming in scares me.
@mrsweeves7035
@mrsweeves7035 Жыл бұрын
@@warntheidiotmasses7114 Yeah I'm actually working in the OEM/OES space and there have definitely been issues with local suppliers. They need a lot of upskilling help.I'm also living in Thailand, then things become clearer
@warntheidiotmasses7114
@warntheidiotmasses7114 Жыл бұрын
@@mrsweeves7035 I live here too. I used to do Six Sigma for GE Healthcare. Kind of retired but looking to get into Thailand's derivatives market.
@illeatmyhat
@illeatmyhat 2 жыл бұрын
I know that this is about the "Asian" sphere of influence, but I wonder why Mexico never became a legitimate choice for offshore manufacturing?
@GuerreroMisterioso95
@GuerreroMisterioso95 2 жыл бұрын
Low innovation, poverty and high crime
@ChairmanMo
@ChairmanMo 2 жыл бұрын
Massive Corruption, the country is ruled by a feudal oligarchy that only knows how to extract wealth; then this in turns fuel massive poverty. After as massive poverty destroys the people; they will either flee to the USA and become a permanent labor underclass or deal drugs.
@SianaGearz
@SianaGearz 2 жыл бұрын
I don't know shit about Mexico but i'll tell you what about bits and bobs of Soviet Union. Like that whole Russia, Ukraine, Kazakhstan, and the rest of them? Well maybe not right now, but if you look back 10, 15, 20, 25 years, nothing happened there either. So first off why you'd wanna. Well there's the people, who are highly educated, lots of engineers, scientists, but also skilled former factory workers, from when these countries fully supplied themselves but industrial automation and efficiency was low. With a little money they will create, automate, optimise, and they're naturally resourceful, they're used to things not being quite by the book, things being impossible to acquire, but they invent and make do. There's also space and natural resources so the cost factors are very much on your side. But you can't, it would be the worst idea ever. Reason number one is organised crime. "Racket" they call it. Shakedowns. Everything you build, any machinery you acquire, it's not safe, you are probably going to lose it. And of course the organised crime has all the ties to the police and government, you as a budding industrialist do not. They shield each other. The bureaucrats have so gotten used to being fed, they have created a system where they can do anything and you can do nothing, they will create endless impediments, and you will be out of an unpredictable amount of money trying to bribe them, and bribes aren't optional, they are a hard necessity of doing business. You won't even know how and where and why everything is crumbling around you. Even if you were able to navigate the whole thing, like you make your connections to organised crime and you actually get protection and help navigating the bribes, you are likely still to get caught in the crossfire between different crime syndicates. And the hidden tax is overall incalculable, and expands to encompass anything you might earn. So yeah i don't know shit about Mexico, but if they've got some of those issues on their hands, you can't build there.
@GuerreroMisterioso95
@GuerreroMisterioso95 2 жыл бұрын
@@SianaGearz only that ex Soviet countries are safe, and don't have the rot and incredible violence that Mexico has
@SianaGearz
@SianaGearz 2 жыл бұрын
@@GuerreroMisterioso95 You think so? I lived in the most calm and prestigious area of one of the most advanced scientific and engineering cities, which has hundreds of thousands of students, and also that order of magnitude scientists and engineers, and every week, there was a deadly stabbing in the neighbouring streets. There was barely any trash removal, it wasn't timely, and there were a lot of rats. Dead cats and dogs could be found everywhere, often burned alive burned by unparented kids roaming in gangs. All the time, the number of memorial plagues in the streets around was growing. I don't know if this is not an apt description of "rot and incredible violence". I don't know how it is now, i imagine it might be better.
@StefanBacon
@StefanBacon 2 жыл бұрын
It's very frustrating living in the US where it's a federal crime to own a foreign built truck unless it's an antique. I would be all over a Thai 1 or 2 ton truck if it wouldn't land me in prison.
@RK-cj4oc
@RK-cj4oc 2 жыл бұрын
What? What do you mean in prison?
@motorpolitan8884
@motorpolitan8884 Жыл бұрын
@@RK-cj4oc Hyperbole. They mean that it's illegal because it is illegal to import any vehicle into the US that isn't at least 25 years old from the date of production.
@rojosik9385
@rojosik9385 Жыл бұрын
really a simple car that runs on gas is good too much tech can be a bad thing
@studywid
@studywid 2 жыл бұрын
Thailand couldn't keep up with the other countries with the same initial point because STEM isn't its priority
@ridhobaihaqi144
@ridhobaihaqi144 2 жыл бұрын
Thailand CBU cars MUCH BETTER build quality & specs than indo CKD.
@peterkavanagh64
@peterkavanagh64 Жыл бұрын
Individual sewerage cleaning items
@veowsaku
@veowsaku 2 жыл бұрын
Thai will be only the manufacturing hub for automobiles but there will not ever be Thai’s owned car or motorcycle brands.
@Alozhatos
@Alozhatos 2 жыл бұрын
Automotive and Motorcycle industries are in decline. Look at British Leyland’s failure.
@DanDaFreakinMan
@DanDaFreakinMan Жыл бұрын
Still suck that there barely any truly Thai car
@G3NG3N
@G3NG3N Жыл бұрын
No one will buy it. They only use Japanese car.
@DanDaFreakinMan
@DanDaFreakinMan Жыл бұрын
@@G3NG3N Nah some will buy it just for the novelty of it being "Thai" and "their." Kinda like the new TR Transformer
@Davyjones5454
@Davyjones5454 2 жыл бұрын
I feel bad that Malaysia missed the opportunity because the government wanna protect certain people.
@jparsit
@jparsit 2 жыл бұрын
same as others. It is the temptation of human, we are all sinner and ignorant.
@herihazril
@herihazril 2 жыл бұрын
Thailand doesn't have their own national car like Malaysia do.. yet, Malaysia cannot export more cars than what Thailand's do..
@theallseeingeye9388
@theallseeingeye9388 2 жыл бұрын
@@herihazril I think it would be a great study in government policies by looking at Thailand and Malaysia's experience in developing their auto industry. Thailand looks like it attempted to develop a local heavy industry with an aproach focusing on creating a manufucturing eco system. Not sure how much of it was based on aspirations of creating a national car maker. Malaysia went the otherway and ventured into setting up a national car brand, with the hope that we will develop the brand into a company that contributes to the economy.
@theallseeingeye9388
@theallseeingeye9388 2 жыл бұрын
Failure or success is rooted in having a sound and solid plan. This includes getting basic ideas and concepts right. The idea that government has the expertise and ability to create a viable private sector, create new industries, or more business opportunities through legislating laws and involving themselves in setting up private companies is fundamentally a flawed concept. The littany of Malaysian ventures, initiatives and projects that was set up based on the idea above is long enough for us to not question the validity of this idea and approach. One of the biggest reaaon why such initiatives fail is to recognise the of two main factors in private enterprises and the dynamics between both namely supply and demand. Proton, Cyberjaya, Halal Hub, Malaysian attempt at starting a semiconductor industry, National Feedlot, MISC and the list goes on and on. The Malaysian governments economic policy under Mahathir from 1980s was generally a failure because of the fundamentally flawed idea that the government programs can create a viable profitable private sector by artificially creating supply to meet market demands or create profitable private corporations and viable businesses by using government service and supply contracts to create the demand component. Its effects were not only huge billion ringgit failures but an economy that became inefficient, stagnating and struggling to grow over time.
@rrsharizam
@rrsharizam 2 жыл бұрын
Mahathir government only interested in protecting Chinese cronies, not based on meritocracy. That's why the mismatch happened.
@mz4637
@mz4637 Жыл бұрын
1
@AndrewLambert-wi8et
@AndrewLambert-wi8et 5 ай бұрын
Screw driver technologist.
@user-221i
@user-221i 2 жыл бұрын
Ban cars
@StevenSiew2
@StevenSiew2 2 жыл бұрын
I have a question! Do Thailand allow Lady Boys to build Honda Civics???
@allergischaufdasrontgen7644
@allergischaufdasrontgen7644 2 жыл бұрын
WTF BRO??
@chou3595
@chou3595 2 жыл бұрын
probably
@niahma3494
@niahma3494 2 жыл бұрын
If you will pay a premium for it they probably will
@johnbrookhaven7134
@johnbrookhaven7134 Жыл бұрын
Thailand billionaire is afraid invest billions dollar in automobile industry and Thailand can not invest in education..
@lisawilliams4234
@lisawilliams4234 2 жыл бұрын
Money is an issues that everyone has for a better and luxurious life. Life was hard for me Untill I started trading bitcoin and now earning $8,435 per wee
@viviennetam3059
@viviennetam3059 2 жыл бұрын
These is the most intelligent word ever heard today, you mean Crypto is the new gold.
@frankconley5094
@frankconley5094 2 жыл бұрын
@West Macus that's why you need the help of a professional like Mr Ramsey who trade and understand the market more to earn good income, these professionals understand the market like it's there own farm and makes maximum profit for investors.
@frankconley5094
@frankconley5094 2 жыл бұрын
@West Macus I trade with him, The profit are secured and over a 100% return on investment directly sent directly to your wallet
@frankconley5094
@frankconley5094 2 жыл бұрын
@West Macus Yeah, my first investment with Mr Ramsey bills earned me profit of over $25'530 US dollars, and ever since then he has been delivering
@jeffreym.schiro8836
@jeffreym.schiro8836 2 жыл бұрын
Ramsey bills has been managing my trade for months and I keep making profit every week, I made $9,130 last week
@bnarit
@bnarit 2 жыл бұрын
The final suggestion is quite impossible to implement. The current birth rate is low, so human resources are limited. Many graduate studies are lack students which causes the problem in the research.
@jparsit
@jparsit 2 жыл бұрын
Not really, human resource always there if open the borders. It is the corruption and evil government self-interested. That is a cause and effect. A video maker focuses only IT but he knows the causes.
@bnarit
@bnarit 2 жыл бұрын
@@jparsit If you rely on the neighbor country worker, why doesn't foreigner invests directly to neighbor country? Why Thailand? for ex. malaysian gain more success in semi industries, why dont get there. For Automotive, the recent situation, some of manufacture is moving to indo. The situation in Thailand, if you hire neighbor country and have manager level from japan, What for? What is the reason to have a industrial pollution in thailand? without getting a dime.
Why Australia Doesn’t Make Their Own Cars
27:09
Asianometry
Рет қаралды 437 М.
Japan’s Commercial Jet Failure
20:38
Asianometry
Рет қаралды 383 М.
Survival skills: A great idea with duct tape #survival #lifehacks #camping
00:27
Жайдарман | Туған күн 2024 | Алматы
2:22:55
Jaidarman OFFICIAL / JCI
Рет қаралды 1,4 МЛН
World’s Deadliest Obstacle Course!
28:25
MrBeast
Рет қаралды 146 МЛН
Bangkok’s Big Housing Boom (& Bust)
21:58
Asianometry
Рет қаралды 120 М.
When an ASML Lithography Machine Goes Down
13:40
Asianometry
Рет қаралды 65 М.
The Crazy Computations Inside Your Smartphone Cameras
17:28
Asianometry
Рет қаралды 335 М.
MIT Has Predicted that Society Will Collapse in 2040 | Economics Explained
18:47
Economics Explained
Рет қаралды 13 МЛН
How Tiny Singapore Became a Petro-Giant
14:35
Asianometry
Рет қаралды 177 М.
Why don't we all just use Geothermal Energy?
14:38
Just Have a Think
Рет қаралды 1,6 МЛН
How Rice is Made in Thailand 🇹🇭
12:44
Retired Working For You
Рет қаралды 56 М.
Why Russia Can’t Replace TSMC
16:07
Asianometry
Рет қаралды 1 МЛН
Australia Should Be a Failure. Why Isn't It?
18:25
Economics Explained
Рет қаралды 1,1 МЛН
The First Transistors
24:50
Asianometry
Рет қаралды 236 М.
Survival skills: A great idea with duct tape #survival #lifehacks #camping
00:27