Hate it tbh. Makes him sound like AI.

​@@Vespyr_he's Welsh and happy

Uh that’s nice.

My favorite narrator about the universe, you also get surprised when he talks about surprising facts, or how ever you call 'surprise' in another words

Brian Cox has a slightly similar smiling voice.

not qualified for this but i believe that would only go so far. without the sun to provide more energy to the planet, energy stored in chemical bonds that life could use will eventually be converted to unusable forms and then left via the atmosphere.

Yeah, what they said ^ While the Chemoautographic crab people, aren't overly affected by the solar cycles. Event's in their Ocean volcanic homes, can increase or decrease with the solar cycles. Cycles that can mean the uprising or downfall of human civilizations are hardly noticed by our crabby, photo energy free friends. They do care about what this means for humans and feel our continued disconnect from the earth and the self, is making every step closer to this shift, more difficult than it should be. The next stable time period after the coming multiple thousand years of major instability, will see new appreciation for "stable weather". Just as it did for the ancestors about 8kya. Climate change - the only constant is change so I just call it climate and study its incredible facts. We've had a great run and let's hope more knowledge makes it through the next big one Interesting time to be alive ❤

It's not fuchsia. It's pink

Listen 👂 to what he says properly, don't your ears 👂 work 😮

And what melts that rock one might ask?

Words be hard.

Nothing of consequence.

@@liarliarpumpkineater4808shut up foo

So many people think that by using the big long words that, that makes them sound intelligent when it is completely the opposite. it's good to see people speaking normally

Yes who would have thought the shifting amounts of radiation the sun bathes us with every day would have an effect on our planet and its weather....

it's obviously cow farts and fossil fuels bro. It can't be solar cycles bro trust me bro the romans were pumping out a bunch of fossil fuels during the rise of their empire and that's why the world was 3C hotter back then bro trust me please bro@@SilvaDreams

None work for the UN climate grift.

Unfortunately there isn't. Their funding all comes from political sources.

We already know the effect, life and death.

It makes sense when you look at it from the point of view entropy. Life is an extremely rare and unlikely state of being, so you would be unlikely to find it in a high entropy environment, but rather on the fringes of such environments - i.e planets located in the Goldilocks zone around main sequence stars.

Cuz water

That`s why its crazy that we are the first species with a choice to save ourselves and we have chosen not too! and yet we think we are a space faring species but cannot manage being a sustainable earth faring one . Bizarre we are . Lets see how fast we can raise temperatures to unlivable ! , fastest ever so far .

Fahrenheit sucks centigrade is way better.

​@MyKharli It's also funny how we think we affect the planet that much. The sun and the planet itself makes our alterations look like nothing. Just like global warming which started around 400 years ago near the beginning of the industrial revolution but hilariously that was also when there was a massive uptick in volcanic activity which has only been increasing but has been why we have been able to have such good agriculture. A single volcanic eruption by the way can make the entire human greenhouse gas output look like a fart in the wind and even more hilariously more CO2 which they vilify is actually good because that encourages more plant growth, just look at the jurassic period which had many times the CO2 in the atmosphere and plants THRIVED as we had mega fauna everywhere.

... I would have thought the opposite, so this is really interesting

so did the video, 'hams use solar maximum to their advantage despite the ionospheric conditions being changable, the video gets this wrong. @@OneOfTheFirstToWatchStarTrek

@@OneOfTheFirstToWatchStarTrek. The sunspots increase the charge of the ionosphere, providing a barrier of sorts which a radio wave can bounce off of. These bounces are called skips. A high frequency radio wave leaves the antenna, hits the ionosphere and is reflected back to earth. This happens many times. The length of the skip is determined by the height of the ionosphere and the wavelength of the radio transmission. Longer wavelengths have a shorter skip zone, shorter wavelengths have a longer skip zone. For example the 160 meter band skips back to earth in less than 100 miles - the 10 meter band’s skip returns to earth some 1000+ miles. These are general statements… specific conditions change.

The summer of 1980 in Southern California, I was a radio operator at 29 palms. At midnight we change frequencies, and I talked to an army fellow in Georgia who had the same freq. our radios generally only transmitted about seven miles. Radio is so cool.

Mo.

@@tracemiller9924 Eenie Meenie Miney MO!

That kind of stuff starts to make more sense when you consider some of the electric universe ideas. Neptune and the sun have a much more interesting relationship than current astronomy allows for: anode/cathode

Check out the work of Valentina Zharkova. She has successfully modeled the relationship between the suns two magnetic fields and climate on earth.

​@@SubparFiddle Are you saying that the Sun + Neptune is a... 4.6 billion kilometer wide Battery!? And the heliosphere is the "salt bridge" between the two? That would be METAL if that's true.

This is more so because of weaker magnetosphere allowing in more particles in solar storms. But obviously the sun has to be spewing out stuff in order for the aurora to be more active, too.

thats the weakening of the earth's magnetic field. also a huge influence on our weather not recognized by the carbon nutjobs.

At an 11 year cycle it would be 2025, 2014 and 1993. Looking at data, rather than just subjective observations, searching the website statista for australia-annual-average-mean-temperature (I can't provide a link because the comment keeps being removed due to channel rules) as an example, there's very clearly little to no connection between temp and the 11 year cycle, the increased solar activity is describing solar flares, atmospheric warming impacting clouds and not really ground temperature. Also as a side note, as to why subjective data isn't good to use, the hottest summer we (Australia) had in the early 2000's was 2002, between 2013 and 2021 (the latest year of data included) only 2021 was cooler than the hottest year in the early 2000's

45c almost everyday here in my city in Brazil.. And we are in the end of the winter, it should be max 29c today... In the southern most areas it should be max of 10c but its reaching almost 25c deggress everyday! Our winter is becoming summer and our summer hell.

All the smart environmental justice activists will tell ya that capitalism is causing the Sun's dangerous activity...

I was thinking the same thing about the 90s.

@@Gary-zq3pz well, no. They will say that the capitalist drive for fossil fuels and the lack of interest in changing to greener tech due to "costs" is the cause of climate change... any non fox news fan would agree they're pretty spot on

Some things just don't effect those who aren't in a sector being impaired from it. My previous job was remote telecommunications for the oil fields of Alberta and Saskatchewan. Rig leases are often in the middle of no where, sometimes 100's of km into the forest. Where communications are zero. That is where I came in and provided cellular boosting and a mesh wifi network for the entire oil rig lease. Communications are incredibly important for oil and gas operations as every drilling site has 15+ people there at a time and at minimum of 2 contractors coming and going every day (fuel delivery, NDT, comms (me), safety, ect.) and dozens of video/phone meetings. I can remember a handful of days where all cellular was knocked out in one area because of a solar storm as our boosters rely on a single tower for our donor signal. Consultants weren't happy they couldn't call out or do much because of such. Thankfully they didn't last long if there wasn't any equipment damaged on the providers side.

Because so far we've been incredibly lucky. No scratch that, we've been so immensely lucky during your life time that we've begun (as usual with all problems that aren't going to touch our daily lives) to ignore it. But scroll back 164 years ago... and it wasn't as fun. A Carrington level blurp would destroy most of modern society. Forget internet, it's all the other things that keep you living a relatively acceptable life that are going away. Medicines, textiles, fuel, and more.

It's a game of chance. In 2012 a CME missed which would have caused untold damage to everything electrical if it ever hit. Fast forward to 2025, if we do get hit the entire world would potentially stop. No banking, no GPS for navigation, no logistics for food delivery, no internet, no power.

@@aserta You ask some good questions, but - and I don’t mean to be disrespectful - they indicate that you don’t understand why CMEs or geomagnetic storms are dangerous. And that’s not unusual; you would need working knowledge of electromagnetism, plasma physics, grid engineering, several complex scientific disciplines. This is why it is so hard for the layman to put the threat of a geo-storm in its proper context. A CME that hits earth saturates the earth’s geomagnetic field with tons of energetic plasma particles from the sun, as well as carrying the sun’s own magnetic field with it. When these interact, our magnetic field is “pushed” inward, distending it toward the ground on our day side and creating a long “tail” on the night side. The charged particles themselves are not so dangerous to us: they either collect at the poles and make aurorae, or - more dangerously - they interact with satellites. Most satellites usually exist within the protective boundary of our own magnetic field, but when it’s distended, they are now exposed to much more damaging solar weather. The earthside danger is in how those magnetic fields are bent. On the tail side, they can “snap” back together, releasing huge amounts of energy, terawatts and above. These moving magnetic fields induce currents in conductors (Faraday’s law, one of Maxwell’s 4 equations that describe electromagnetism). The bigger the conductor, the more it acts like an antenna for this induction. This means small devices are generally safe, but the kilometres-long power lines of the electrical grid will have currents induced in them. The problem is that the current induced is highly direct, as opposed to the alternating current they usually carry. This causes phase imbalance, which will saturate the cores of transformers, heating them up and possibly even blowing them. Transformers are large and expensive equipment, and repairing or replacing them is hard work. However, to stop all of this from happening, you merely need to isolate the transformers from the grid until the induced current goes away. Yes you’ll have widespread power outages for a few hours, but if you tripped your breakers and relays on time, likely no damage will occur. We have sun-facing satellites that detect such events well in advance, so there’s no real “surprise”. There was an incident of a geomagnetic storm collapsing the grid in Quebec in 1989, and doomposters often point to this as indicative of the danger posed by these events. However, the collapse wasn’t caused by grid damage, but by seven different safety relays tripping all at once to protect sensitive grid infrastructure. In other words, the grid did its job. Service was restored quickly and easily. Tl;dr: geomagnetic storms are very complex phenomena, and unless you’re a plasma physicist or have doctorates in electrodynamics/magnetodynamics, you likely aren’t worrying about them for the correct reason. They CAN be truly dangerous, but they can be well mitigated, and our modern electrical grids are designed around this mitigation. So, don’t worry so much!

The difference will be that we now have an accelerating decrease in our Earth's protective electromagnetosphere. Thereby causing lesser impacts to cause more impact, and an actual large impact would be catastrophic.

Maybe if they don't say climate change or global warming the AI monitors don't assign a propaganda notice.

They don’t flag disinformation

2025 will be much worse...

Wow!

Have you heard of the carrington event?

Yes, author got it wrong, presumably to follow the fear and loathing narrative. During one peak in the late '50s, I was in Iowa and contacted a" ham" in New Zealand tuning up his transmitter. He was putting out about 50 watts. I turned my watts down to about 10 and he could still read my morse code signal. One night I contacted hams on all continents, including Antarctica. It was a global festival, thanks to the sunspots.

@@paulmcknight4137 I have made plenty of contacts all over the world on less than 50 watts , if I am running portable I only run 5 watts and still get into the US from Australia if conditions are good ... 73 de vk2ccr

​@@paulmcknight4137 i wonder if the rise of the internet coming to households in the late 80s to the 2000s reminded you of this memory back from then? if you where aware of it of course. thats very very interesting!

Don’t mention the Skip Distance .

​@@paulmcknight4137that is so cool!!!

Ew are you a conspiracy theorist?

I'm sure thats coming with the electric car mandates. This will surely save us lol....

@@Vee3000 Ew a dense person who can't understand a joke?

They will definitely use something entirely beyond human control to push their human-caused narrative.

High solar radiation charges up the ionosphere, therefore absorbing radiation that would interfere with electrical grids on the ground, it would seem to me. Satellites could be a problem.

Yes. Be prepared for our total reset. Ne grid. No repair possible . Total reset. Our Noah’s arc event!

If it does, I hope we name it the Kaczynski wave.

The aurora are quite dim, and only a few high-sensitivity cameras are capable of seeing them with much detail in real-time, and if you do increase the sensitivity that high you have to deal with lots of noise and poor color saturation. But if you increase the exposure length to say, 1 second per frame you get bright, detailed, colorful aurora like in that timestamp. Of course 1 sec/frame played back at 30frames/sec means a 30x fast-forwarding effect.

​@daveachuk That actually makes a lot of sense, thanks for that. My understanding of photography/videography is only slightly better than my understanding of astrology ...

You can look up "Northern Lights in Real Time". They can be bright enough to be videoed, even with a phone. There is a lot of motion and flashing that is not obvious in time lapse.

Very

The geomagnetic field of earth never gets mentionned in these videos. The currently weakening field might prove you wrong.

@@thomasbursting4951 As far as I know fluctuations in Earth's magnetic do not affect the Sun's intensity. It is rather the other way round.

@@MrMezmerized right, I thought you meant 'minor' related to the impact on earth.

@@MrMezmerized The combined effect of the Sun's increasing luminosity and the Earth's outer core starting to cool down will take its toll however over this next eon.

Direct and indirect effects. He wont say climate, but the Sun drives climate. Total Solar Irradiance increases at max. This SC max is weak and seems to have peaked already.

Tick, Tiick, Tixxx 💀

Citation needed for claims of things that you think seem to happen.

The great lakes were ice free last year I'm not too sure about that.

...but according to psyence, the sun has little effect on ear'th...🙄

citation needed for dheads that probably work for a pay as you click agency. I will take him on his word, MORE THAN, any politician since 1950, any Dosh for Deals Scientisc or any script-reading hack. Citation NOT needed.@@filonin2

Worked 'em over, huh? Did you work 'em over good?

What would happen to your radio during a maunder minimum?

Yes! During high sunspot activity, Maximum Usable Frequency, [MUF] goes up to about 28MHZ Short wave signals bounce off the ionized atmosphere. During sunspot minimum, the MUF lowers; only lower frequencies bounce back to earth, and they don't skip as far. One night in the late Fifties peak, I was on LI, NY, and contacted {"worked"] all continents, even a navy guy in Antarctica, using Morse code, the first digital medium. It was a global festival, very much like the internet is today.

@@scottboehmer1114 During a minimum, on the 10, 12, 15 & 17 meter bands, there are fewer opportunities to work distant stations. So you work local stations -- those about 50 miles away. And then you try the 20, 30, 40, 80 and 160 meter bands, which tend to still let you work some distant stations. And when you tire of that, you go to the very high frequencies, such as the 2 meter band, and work the International Space Station as it passes overhead! There's always something fun to do in Ham Radio!

@@bigguy7353 Oh yeah. I "pegged" their "needle" and blew out their speakers!

Sun becomes a red giant one day as it switches from burning hydrogen to burning helium and will wipe out all life left on this Earth if not even the entire Earth itself. (And 'yes', a long time from now, but the destination is set like a way point on a journey).

The shifting poles aren't related to solar max or Sol in much more than that Terra spins around Sol. No, those are normal fluid mechanics at play. There's a laboratory in a University that does a molten sodium experiment in the bid to figure out how our "shield" is related to these things. They've "flipped the pole" so to speak quite a few times by nature of the molten sodium.

​@@charlesbrightman4237They estimate that to happen in a few billion years, but before it expands to that level it will get big enough and hit enough to render the planet inhospitable within about 1 billion years. If humans are still around at that time, they will have hopefully found the technology to colonize at the very least moons in the outer solar system, if not other systems entirely.

Unfortunately the big money is on blaming CO2 for everything so very little funding for real science.

@@digitalfootballer9032 Well, billions of years or not, the destination would be set like a way point on a journey. Either species on and from this Earth get off of this Earth, OR they all eventually die and go extinct. But then also consider this item from my files: EXISTENTIAL PHYSICS: Current Analysis: (subject to revision as new information might dictate): WARNING: NOT FOR ALL AUDIENCES: Only read this if you think you can handle it. Future: a. 6th mass extinction event (possibly occurring now), and the 6th won't be the last. (And 'yes', at least some humans will survive these earlier mass extinction events). b. Sun becomes a red giant one day as it switches from burning hydrogen to burning helium and will wipe out all life left on this Earth if not even the entire Earth itself. (And 'yes', a long time from now, but the destination is set like a way point on a journey). c. Our spiral shaped galaxy is most probably collapsing in upon itself, (note: adding to the red shift observations by the way), and it's possible ALL galaxies eventually collapse in upon themselves (not confirmed yet). d. 'If' one believes in the big bang theory, and space itself expanding, then the entire universe and all in it will most probably end in a big freeze. (And 'yes', a long time from now, but the destination would be set like a way point on a journey). Note also: the singular big bang is probably not really true, there are other 'normal' explanations for the red shift observations, and the universe is most probably not going to end in a big freeze. Also, 'if' the current forces of nature came into existence in the early moments of the expansion of the singularity, and the singularity is still basically expanding, then the forces of nature will probably evolve one day, possibly even in the very next moment of expansion of this universe, and possibly wipe out everything in existence in basically a blink of an eye. Of which note also, the forces of nature as well as the universe always existed and never had a beginning. But 'if' modern science is correct, well ....................................blink........................................... e. Outer space travel: Currently impossible to do for long periods of time due to: 1. Harmful cosmic radiation, including any potential neutrino impacts. (While most neutrinos go right through us, not all of them do all of the time). AI and biological life would most probably not survive unless proper protections were had. 2. Biological species, especially humans, need proper gravity conditions and large rotating space ships probably will not work for space bases on planets and moons. Otherwise, biological life, especially humans, will not survive long term. 3. Biological species, especially humans, need many more items to properly survive, otherwise they won't. * Note: If anybody has any actual factual evidence to counter the above, I welcome it. ** HAVE A NICE DAY IF THAT IS WHAT YOU CHOOSE TO HAVE, WHILE WE HAVE DAYS LEFT THAT WE CAN ENJOY. FOR EVERY MOMENT THAT PASSES, ONE LESS MOMENT BEING ALIVE AND ONE MOMENT CLOSER TO BEING NOT ALIVE.

No it's not.

Yes…. It is…

If the magnetic field is weakening it’s because the lithosphere is being harnessed for HAARP, For advanced energy weapons from space such as Thor and because of ongoing worldwide climate engineering programs

​@@filonin2It is weakening.

Glad to see there are others paying attention.

I watch SolarHam, we had a moderate geomagnetic storm pass by that timeframe. People should be more aware of these, the further south the auroras appear, the worst the storm. We are a couple years from Solar Maximum but yet the sun is already very active - almost more active than it should be.

I’d say it was even more astonishing that you could see the night sky in Lancashire.

Seriously, where are these coming from?

Lycanthropy is tough to live with.

@@Zeppathy It’s my right to identify as a Wolfe, some months it’s a giraffe.

I did the math on your grasp of reality. 😄🙂

@@eternalstudent7461 I was waiting for a response such as yours.🤪

Hopefully Feb 30th provides some relief 😅

Thats interesting

yes your right i used too call it the skip and i managed to talk to people other side of the world from here in uk

Oh my goodness. That is fascinating.

Whats that movie..."FREQUENCY", good one that.

I think they slowly decrease over time then slowly increase again in another cycle, but I'm not sure 🤔

when i visited Ireland i went to Donegal for a few days, it was great

@@sloppingfish946 That's nice

Then there's longer cycles we know nothing about.

early 80s northern ontario canada can confirm 360 degree green rings pulsating staight up to 3 triangles on top. i thought the world was ending.

Wrong. The ancient people were savages who werent super advanced or anything. They had less light pollution and waaaaaaay more time on their hands to map stars and all that Doesnt mean they were more in touch or whatever. Oh wow, they could predict ecplises. They still were stupid as hell and traded giant masses of land for pearls and cloth. They also sacrificed 10.000s of people a year for a supposed blood god. I would take any modern human over one of these ancients any day.

No way

Because you can't tax the sun.

@@pippip8744 im sure theyll find a way

I bet your weirdness is as awesome as the sun.🤘😊

Everyone is weird in their own way

The carbon demon that trees and other green leafy things need to survive. 😂

You're wise to watch nature. Too many are glued to a screen these days.

"See" more like "feel". It's akin to us getting chicken skin when a chill wind blows by.

Firstly, Newsweek isn't a scientific journal. It does have some science new, but it's not a scientific journal, and that's very important. Secondly, there was no article published by Newsweek on that day. The closest ones were on May the 31st, and then on June the 7th. So, to conclude, the planets don't affect the Solar cycle whatsoever.

Astrum IS stuck on CO2. I went a few rounds with him in another vid's comment section. Water vapor provides ~99% of "green house", while CO2 already blocks ~100% of IR over the frequencies it interacts with.

I love you.

He doesn't sound like an American to me at all. EDIT: Channel description says "United Kingdom"

@@antred11 Oh ... oops ...suddently I am the ignorant :D

​@@vommNot suddenly, you always were.

I don't think he is American, he sounds too smart and educated.