best comment

lol

Wow good job man

lol good one

Haha haven't thought of that

Its Square-1

@@seanachafe6844 that's what he said

I08i÷ 8w02

Yet I feel so dumb

Jerry smith be like

YOU ARE A LEGEND

Lol

exactly

And just to be clear. I look at it and it's not a Simpsons paradox and math stuff

yep

Yo preacher whaaatt is uppp

Didn't expect u to be here Oh well...

Preeeeaaaacher

Holy crap I did not expect you to be hear

I am voted for you in champions

Welson Liong yes 😂

Lol

Awesome

@@ClumsyCuber hi

Cries in pb

Ikr

I wouldnt say its only using "logic" because he makes some algorithm for solving that square-1 and he get that algorithm from his "knowledge".

fathin maftuh abdullah - it was definitely logic related, how he used jperm on a 3x3 and applied it on a cube with totally different mechanisms, thats just crazy. I just solved the squan for the first time today, watched several tutorials and it took me HOURS, like more than 3 (only following instruction) and I’m still slower than Dylan who does it partially intuitive. So he’s definitely really smart.

Sowath yea

500th like. I guess I’m special now

u sound like a mom who thinks there so funny but they are actually funny

GET OUT GET OUUUUUUT

@@zeyy84 why u mad

@@velocestreams8269 Wait, it was actually funny? Didn't expect that lol

@@rysea9855 it was just a really bad pun. thats why its funny

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/b8CiireexKeqoZs.html

nice non cuber

@@pleeppants1712 yes, that…that is the point

By saying 2/3 of a 3x3 you mean cross and f2l, right?

2/3rds? I can only finish the white side sometimes.

Steven Nguyen Same!

Yea

Lol! I wondered that too!

Is the parity algorithm tough?

shannu boi I think it's like 20-25 moves, but i don't do sqaun so someone can correct me on that.

If your cuber and know how to solve cube You will understand everything

haha

@HyperKillingMachine RBLX those arent hard tho

🤲🏻 🙌🏻 🧼 wash your hand before typing

@@Ayanokouji9 I struggle to believe you went out of your way to wash your hands, just to say 'wash your hands'.

He's a really humble and wholesome dude.

@@Jonathan-st5oy yall praising him for that? Oof

@@-Me_ dude they're praising him because literally every youtuber asks for likes but j perm doesnt because he is a good person

@@napstablook9539 how does that decide whether ur a good person or not it makes no sense

@@yeah8709 people love to overreact to anything these days good and bad

Sheldon Rego whats csp

Khánh Nam Nguyễn Cube shape parity. Basically you can avoid parity in every squan solve but there’s a bunch of algorithms for it.

Steven Nguyen Changing parity is completely intuitive and needs no algs, the hard part is determining in inspection if you need to do your regular cubeshape solution or if you need to change parity. There are 90 cases and sometimes it's different when mirrored in the bottom, so it's effectively learning 180 cases. I used to know them all but now I've forgotten it.

Ping Pong Cup Shots How do you change parity intuitively. I do know about tracing tho

@@nguyener14 well you just find somewhere where you can do an odd number of swaps, hence changing parity. If you have 6 corners on one layer, rotating does a 6-cycle (aka 5 swaps). If you can get all 6 corners on the right, slashing does 3 swaps etc. Those are the most obvious ways but by the time you're halfway through CSP you'll learn more ways to do it. By the time I was nearly done all I needed to do to learn a case was do a trace, solve it normally and see if I get parity. If I didn't, I'd remember that. If I did, I'd know to look for somewhere along the way to change parity without even learning the alg :p

Simpson’s paradox math stuff*

Lol

Lol the moment I saw this comment I was at the part

man be solving a square one and finding the cure of cancer for "fun"

Cancer isn't funny

Lol

be grateful :

If i got a sq1 for Christmas: AYO WTFFF

Welp, guess it's back to Square 1. *yes I stole this joke*

And the square 1 is scrambled

Is that u kaneki??

Thanks! Stuff like this makes me glad I didn't do a lot of puzzles early on haha

I learned most puzzles like this. It's so satisfying when you get it down but it's so frustrating and even more time consuming

You should try the 4D cube!

Ty Jones wait what????

@@brayyan2384 superliminal.com/cube/cube.htm The 2^4 might be a little easier to tackle at the start, but if you understand how to solve a 3x3, you can figure these out with some work!

Oof fail I tried to do bold writing lmao guess it doesn't work on two different lines

he's too smart for us to understand

Parity is rlly easy to learn Intuitively ps there are really easy algs And csp exists

That is an avoidable parity I think

The parity's easy to avoid if you know 1-Look PLL on a 3x3, or at least can recognize every possible case in 1LPLL. If you can't though, then you'll have to deal with parity at the end of the solve and that's much a much nastier alg than the pre-emptive one.

@@PanjaRoseGold I'm not a cuber but KZfaq has me down a rabbithole of these tonight. But... this seems like some good life advice for anything you can apply it to.

I've never quite understood what parity is

Jack Myers yes lol

Jack Myers I get the reference

Totally get that reference

I think its from dg

Brought to you by DGCubes and stolen by Jack Myers

that is not a good alg at all...

Also for the t perm on top be could’ve done R2 U R2 U’ R2 U’ D R2 U’ R2 U R2 D’

You could also use Misalign bottom R2 U R2 U' R2 U R2 U' R2

Bro can anybody use square 1 notation in the comments?

@@SanguineFire lmao

50/50 is 50/50 I guess

Huh?

He said he was studying Simpson's paradox, which has to do with statistics. So I think "no cancer" was a label for a group being compared with a "cancer" group in a table.

No CORNER

100

Cancer isn't funny

@@COAllAces it isnt a fun joke

"no cancer 100"

@@tom5229 i was just about to say that lol

We need spam the comments for a video about that.

MUST BE DONE

That isn’t possible

I’m aware it’s called a joke

fantdm hero what do you think I should say after that

@@khanhnguyennam6007 You weren't supposed to say anything if you didn't get the joke

I forgot to laugh my bad

Lol

Most underrated

ye notice how we're not laughing. man, what a dad joke, here take this: L

@@bradynewman626 its a pun

That's exactly how I did it first time as well

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ar2jZqScmNCoeYE.html Please support and subscribe

Mukhtar Nazeer no

10/10 pun great job

me

@@speedcubingaccount4121 cool

@Ds Cuber me

see you there!

Where are you coming from

@@2-MinutesCraft why

Lol I get it

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ar2jZqScmNCoeYE.html Please support and subscribe

@@2-MinutesCraft no one will subscribe to you if you beg for people to subscribe in the comments section

@Kiefer Pagute yes

@Kiefer Pagute SUB-1 4x4 (SKIPPED PARITY ALG) (NOT CLICKBAIT) (DON’T TRY AT HOME)

Coming from my mind

@@Jtak-qu5hk aaaaaaaah we are golden wind

Reverse psychology.

*laughs in Sall Andrei*

this is one

I'll scrambled hahahaha

Yeah kapwa pinoy

A mirror shape shifts right? Cuz I thought that one took a lot more thought than a 3x3.

It seriously isnt for beginners 🤣

Yeah

😂😂😂

Aulong did it took? Did it took Weilong? But it took mei-long But you Did it took Yulong?

@@rccubing4924 Yuxin you're so smart huh? Well, I gan do it too.

tbf a lot of this is just past experience in puzzles, particularly the algorithms behind a rubik's cube. although he is clearly a genius i assure you your years of engineering are very intact lol

@@scubasteve6175 thank youu so much ! I actually knew that but what i meant was tho it should have been my first instinct to sketch out a solution a try to understand the algorithm if i had the cube in my hands i would have skipped all these steps.. it kinda felt like i stabbed my profs in the back hahah

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/ar2jZqScmNCoeYE.html Please support and subscribe

THIS IS BASICALLY THE LONG VERSION OF MY PREVIOUS COMMENT. I just talk into it really fast and before I know it my cmment is 20 pages long so Im like oh well... can't delete that now, might as well hit send, hope there are no typos, good luck, have fun reading my crazy thoughts, and listening to me rambling🤦🏻‍♂️ lmao 😂 As a rule, I never look at tutorials or videos for help until AFTER I solve it once on my own, (and almost no one seems to want to do that,) SO MAD PROPS TO YOU FOR DOING THAT!!!! And with a square1! You could get a degree in Math easily (if thats your thing.) I solved mine with Algebraic Structures & modular arithmetic. (The original 3x3 took me almost a year!) My notation was almost identical! My "left & right Sunes" were symmetrical: -L -U +L -U -L +2U +L = 0 and slo R +U -R +U +R +2U -R = 4U = 0 (4U = U4 = 0 'cuz 4U in a row is like 0, like doing nothing,) i.e. 0 is the "additive identity" (I remember thinking it was important for me to see if my algs were equal to 0 in certain cases while other cases I had to be certain they didn't = 0.) It depended on parity, even if this type of "addition" is non- commutative. ( R' U ≠ U R' ) But if you forget cubes & rotations & just pretend you're in Math class then -R +U +R -U = 0 Also, I write "2R" instead of "R2" The main difference that may be confusing about my notation is this: What every cuber calls "R prime" I do the same thing but call it "minus R" This is because if you look at the "D side" from the botton then it's turning clockwise (but I was always hold the cube facing the green with white side up & I imagined the cube was transparent & that I was looking "through the puzzle from the top" which makes cubers D' look clockwise to me instead of looking at the bottom (which would have confused me when I started out.. lol. ) I yeah, dude, I made sketches, I drew graphs with nodes & vertices, adjacency matrices from Linear Algebra. I wrote down all the algorithms that I made up, (so I could do them in reverse when they failed instead of starting over. 😂) So, full disclosure: I solved the 2x2 1st with no help, and that was REALLY HARD for me to do "Lone Wolf Style." Afterwards, I had confidence... AND I had two Rubik's cubes to double my output 🤣🤣🤣 AND the "Void cube" so when I got stuck I could try 2 different things in the other cubes and compare... and you did that with a Square 1??? Good for you, man!! I got MAD respect for you. That's that Lone Wolf s**t right there!!!!. 👍 Did you write anything down or just do it all in your head and rewind when you made an error?? It took me a few weeks to get the 1st 2layers on square 1 and its been looking like a bird house for a months 😂 Would you believe that I solved the Void Cube BEFORE the 3x3x!!!??? Fortunately I had the foresight to write down my moves... so I was able to re-use that same algorithm to solve the 3x3 the 3x3 right after (Today I can solve the 3x3x in under 2mins.) The 1st thing I did after each solve was compare my solution to the ones online I still solve like that with puzzles today. Cuboids I can usually solve same day with no help: 3x3x2, 2x2x3, 2x2x4, 2x2x6 and no paper. Except the 3x3x4 ... that took me a while and I got stuck with a parity on the last layer. Megaminx & Kilominx no problem until last layer. Mirror cubes, Dino cubes, Ivy Cubes, pyraminx, all easy. all 4x4 , 5x5, 6x6, and 8x8 I can do... just tedious af. (I love the 4x4 & 6x6 for long trips. Xman cube has me baffled right now but it's also delicate so I can't just plug those algs in and fingertrick. Gearball was deceptively easy which made it hard (if that makes any sense.) Puzzles I really love & are in "the Goldilocks difficulty range are the Kilominx, Rubik's Missing Link, the Pentacle Cube, the Clover Cube, the Skewb, the skewb extreme, the skewb Dodekahedron, and even tho thesesseem innocent: (the 3x3x2 cuboid & 4x4x4 cuz I forget how to solve the parity algs on both of those if I hadn't done them inn a while.) and the Penrose cube. they're fun af. Some honorable mentions are the 11 steel Hanayama Puzzles I own, , 2x2 gearshift by Oskar, The Gordian Knot, The Moyu Axis Wheel Cube which I will NEVER scramble again! (Im good on all axis cubes.) And puzzle I own but haven't attempted yet cuz Im scared are Mefferts Ghost Cube, the Fisher Mirror Cube? (I think its called,)