I totally agree. I’m an A7 owner and the only choice I will have is to go up to a Panamera because the A7 is going bye bye as well

I blame SUV and EV as a whole.

i can’t wait for the ev successor to the r8. it will cost and weigh twice as much, while at the same time being less than half as fun!!

I totally agree with you. I think I may now have to leave the Audi brand and look at others. What a shame.

Can't blame Audi if nobody is buying the TT

Congrats man!

Thats what you took from it's not what he said though, alot of simping smh 🤦 a gem?

@@ftr911drvr you just have to ruin it dont ya

@@ftr911drvr lmao you clown. Go look at any review of any car now and see the reviewers acting like it’s the greatest thing ever because “we got to test drive it and they treated us nicely” then justify the markup simply because they won’t be paying it. But hey, go watch more “how to not be broke” or “best workout” videos and try to escape your tiny body and even smaller bank account

Can you please stop saying the exact same thing on every single video? Rory is good and we all know that, let's get to the next point, an actual useful comment about the car or the video

@@Schervin are you lonely? It seems like you’re lonely

I mean I have one and stage 3 with 50k in mods lol

If it will go electric it would probably be another SUV "coupe"

If Audi have any intention of making an electric TT, we're probably going to have to wait for battery technology to get a bit better before something like a TT e-tron/e-tron TT or whatever they might call it comes about. The compact, sporty size of the TT would need a small, light, power dense battery that the current chemistries don't support. They might even just replace the TT with the e-tron GT

@@christhompson4630 There is an electric Cayman or Cayman replacement coming in couple of years. Maybe they could inherit it's powertrain for TT. Like Taycan and E-tron coupe.

@@christhompson4630 Correct. I was thinking Mazda could do what their did with the Miata and bring out a fun compact electric car that just happens to be electric.

If you google the new tt it will show you that it's going to be more of a suv. That's the issue now that everyone and his grandma wants to pick the kids up in suv's which in turn destroys the small car market.

They’re cheap. Buy another one.

You don't see them a lot because it's a small car to begin with, also not practical to have more than 1 passenger. I also doubt petrol stations will ever close down since this will declare war between the industries who pump the fuel and shit.

Had mine a year so far.

Yeah i have the 2006 2.0 tfsi and its such a good laugh i love it

2004 TT 2.0 Quattro 225cv...Loved that car

@@midnightcowboy77 it was a 1.8T engine, I had the 225 version too, and the 3.2 V6 Mk1 too

You’ll get 1 one day, if you put your mind to it.

only insecure men call it a hairdressers car

@@rdmz135 or just men with different opinions to yours. Since when is it 'insecure' to think that a design is feminine?

@@xIcarus227 Theres absolutely nothing wrong with calling a design feminine. Thats not exactly whats being said here though, is it? By calling it a hairdressers car you're inferring that the drivers are feminine, not the car. Which is just childish and silly.

@markyes Whatever helps you sleep at night mate

@@rdmz135 The only insecure men are the ones who buy this absolute cretin-mobile. Poundland R8

….such an amazing little car….

Heck, in a few years young drivers will hop in their vehicles and say something like, "Siri, take me to the grocery store." No manual transmission, no automatic, no stops at the gas station, and no excuse for speeding tickets! Remember when?

How about an Mitsubishi Evo VIII? But I guess those Impreza's in blue with the golden rims are eye watering beautiful.

@@martinsinnombre nah. Always been a Subaru for me. Colin McRae, Richard Burns and Petter Solberg driving them in the WRC. 3 of my favourite rally drivers during 1 of the best times in the WRC driving them has made it my rally car for the road I want. Also the sound of that Boxer engine

It’s probably that expensive because of the limited edition.

I have a 2013 AudibTT Roadster, best car i’ve ever had.

@@codeblue9004 they are great cars. I've owned a MK3 for over 3 years now. I bought a MK1 as a second car in November and absolutely love it as well

@AutoTraderTVv What have I won? A swift kick in the business?😆😅🤣😂

Same, to this day my mk1 TT was my favourite car, despite having had many 'better' ones since.

Just get a new RS3...65k...I did

What tune? And any complaints about it?

@@ecshredder I had a United Motorsports tune on both the ECU and transmission. In addition I added a CTS intake. No problems.

@@hayderlion19 thank you 😊

TTRS Mug Edition

dont buy it then

It seem like a joke now but it’ll surely appreciate in price over time as its a limited edition

Idk it doesn’t seem that bad to me. It’s the best thing next to an r8 and the r8 would set you back a lot more. The engineering and design and quality of it is really good. Doesn’t same crazy to me for a final edition car before it becomes extinct

I thought this guy was all about electric cars but now he's giving head to Audi for a car that most people can't afford anyway.

A lot of people don’t like Audi’s? They certainly sell a lot of them. Guess it depends on where you live.

Coming soon...

@@AutoTraderTV very soon I expect as you've just uploaded the R8 and then this TTRS, must be the RS3 next...

Audi Civic. Great drivetrain but horrible design.

Young police officer pulls me over - you were driving a bit aggressively and that engine sounds very loud. “I am so sorry. I assure you, officer, this vehicle is completely stock. I was just running a bit late to work at the hospital, and maybe I was following a bit closely.” Love my 2019 TT-RS - it’s me in automobile form. 108 lb female surgeon. Don’t let the packaging fool you!

Yea they went from a simple and pretty modest car to one that had a lot of features and luxury interior. It’s like night and day going from a Mk1 to a Mk3.

No.

They’re not that impractical though. It’s a good excuse to not give more than one person a ride 😂 I’ve hauled a lot of stuff in my Mk1. A 55” tv fit in the back with the rear seats down.

its siting outside in Europe outside a 100 car park garage down from our apartment building... Wow... I never gonna change my little Audi TT mk1 stage 1... and stage 2 exhaust setup... and twin turbo intake HOLES to let the car BREATHE in the intake department.. obviously it has an intake already, and a radiator infront(where big Audi opening is)...I'm just trying to say this car is awesome to have parked... to DRIVE... man MAN. with a nice backside upgrade I did.. Led(s) tail lights+black colored fit wing, and purple exhaust tips on top of new exhaust pipes fully.... it is AWESOME.... it could look "ricy" but how INSANELY stylish it was... those small modifications do not RUIN the Aluminum colored ... aluminum mostly... I guess.. awesome car :D and then the INSIDE OF THE CAR.. we know Audi in 1990's 2000s best auto maker for interiors... WOW it looks better sportier than the 350z... more ALUMINUM / leather combo EVERYWHERE inside the car... no plastics, actually VERY FEW plastic or carbon parts inside.. mostly only ALU , ALU, alu, hell dashboard had all alu around, hell the radio cover, the e brake, the SHIFTER :D :D

Mk1 is still the best looking of the generations. It’s too bad it never was blessed with a great engine like the 5 cylinder turbo.

@@dogger37JC oh bro it has a GREAT engine. it has the 20V turbo, most of the 20V turbo's were 4 cylinders.. Now it came with the 20v turbo that was 150 hp as well haha.. that is why they called it the hair dresser car, and because of "looks"? Trust me, I don't know bout the 150hp... but the 225hp, few mods to engine, few exhaust mod... I need to dyno to see over the years I assume I am at 250. Bro The 5 cylinder is barely any more power STANDARD.. this motor I have now, with no changes, easily 300-450 bhp. MY Crankshaft, the heart of the motor, is rated up to 1,000 bhp... I'll take that. So overall, even the 4 cylinder motor is UNDER RATED I guess if people like you don't know about that, and I would say my 4 banger with 20 VALVES for a 4 banger... almost 2,000CC + K04 turbo inside, making 20 valves... it sounds NASTY. I dare say even closer to the 250 + hp 5 cylinders... In reality its not that much different. and for you to say Yeah the 20V 5 cylinder awesome.. too bad the shitty 20v 225? was not enough? Okay bro. Im putting my 4 banger 20 V K04 turbo onto the net soon, with decent exhaust... I GARUNTEE it might sound MIGHT sound better than the 250-300 hp MODDED to 700 hp KEN BLOCK Audi 20v 5 CYLINDER... look at that AMAZING sound.. watch when my bullshit video of my car being filmed in a Drone setting.. JUST WatcH when my 20v turbo 1.8 video come out just LISTEN :D You may have to eat your words by that point :D Trust me I could give a fuck what you say, I drive my 20v k04 every day accelerating responsibly... IT sounds insane, drives insane, I love the 5 cylinder of course too but it aint ALLL that difference.. the point is not the 5 cylinders... the point is 4 or 5 cylinders around 2,000C or 2,500 CC WITH a turbo to rank up the motor accell.. and you get the 20 V turbo :D

@@slavche 20V is an okay motor. Sure with mods it can make some power but the 5 cylinder turbo in the TTRS and the RS3 is one of the best engines Audi has ever produced. They took things to another level with the V10, 4.2 V8, and 5 cylinder design.

@@dogger37JC Bro why the hate... Even Jeremy Clarkson who hated on the OG Audi TT from 150 hp, hehe, the 225 hp TT he mentions in the new Grand tours, he says all the Audi motors you say, but then he mentions "Oh the 20V turbo, and.." he did not say OH the 5 cylinder or oh the 5 cylinder 20 v. Jesus. Even The hater, Jeremy :D says 20v turbo. This is not about me, but with the 225 motor I have, modded out slightly crazy sounds GREAT, accell GREAT, it is like the 500+ standard power car(s) I had in the past. Lastly, the 225 TURBO k04 has been, online, recognized as an easy 700+ hp car, AND a great ENGINE. why? with a simple new turbo installed, you can push most of the motor parts past 600 to 700 hp, again with a new turbo you can unlock past 450 bhp or maybe 500 bhp MAX on stock k04. THE reason 225 turbo k04(20v T) is RECOGNIZED as "mad good",excuse the grammar, is because it came with FORGED internals. Forged internals, in this case here, equals Forged Crankshaft, Forged Connecting Rods, Forged Pistons. Ask, why? BECAUSE with a powerful k04 in the tank they cut the compression ratio to 9.0. From what I gather, this means the INTERNALs of the motor then make up for less compression overall ratio, and less turbo activation ( even though k04 is the bigger turbo) this is precisely why this build the 225 has SO MUCH POTENTIAL.. They stuck in a k03, no a k04 turbo but downed the compression ratio... so to get MORE than the previous 150, 180, 200... THEY GOT 225 by INCREASING the internals on the motor.. I CRACKED my crankshaft.. I KNOWWWW the 225 motor has a BRAND different size Forged Crankshaft than the 180 EVEN. For you to call even the 225 k04 20V Turbo not one of the best motors from Audi.. not ONE OF... not the best maybe, but NOT ONE OF?.... okay dog... tell me something about my English on this Essay paper.

Totally disagree. I think in the long run the Mk1’s will be more classic and have the potential to be collectible. Many because of the design and how much it stood out and how well it’s aged. The Mk2 design hasn’t aged that well especially the cheap looking tail lights. Mk2 TTRS will be collectible one day because of the motor.

Well the new Golf R doesn't have a Haldex system, it has a Borg-Warner system. The TT RS did not get that Borg-Warner system.

@@vomErsten yes, the golf r has a really cool system, but if you watch the engineering explained video he refers to the Haldex system and what engineers have told him about it. They say the max 50% rear torque transfer is kind of misleading. You can watch it yourself if you like.

@@salzar4431 It's not misleading when he's talking about the TT RS, which still has the Haldex and is physically not capable of putting more than 50% to the rear...unless the front wheels are spinning. Whatever is said about the new Golf R is not transferable to the TT RS.

@@vomErsten with an open differential on the front axle only One front wheel has to completely loose traction for ALL the torque to go to the rear, just like on a classic 4WD pickup truck with no centre differential. I didn’t say it was said about the Golf R, I said the Haldex system was explained really well in the Engineering Explained video about the Golf R. He was contrasting the Haldex system with the system used in the new Golf R.

Cayman are great cars but very limited on what you can carry in it compared to a TT. A lot less practical unless you have a second car. I fit a 55” TV in the back of my TT.