How much torque does it have? In newton meters pls

He said it in the video, 750

My Cummins has 900ft pounds

@@sejfullah9134 1000Nm @ 1750-3000rpm

@@sejfullah9134 with a simple tune, they can put out 1500nm, although every respectable tuner limits it to 1200nm due to the transmissions limits

And they also had w16 in a veyron and w8 in passat. The over-engineered phaeton, or bi-turbo v12 fitted into station wagon rs6. Definitely good days for the vag

It’s the vag

@@macieksz2829 The RS6 was a V10 biturbo, but yeah, their whole model lineup was incredibly diverse and complex, and unmistakeably German through and through. Good times.

@@soundseeker63 oh completely it was v10, Idk why I made that typo 😵‍💫

Finally I found someone who think alike

🤣🤣🤣

Nıcə

It was designed and built for the R8.. now image that!

@@2RichardD they should have done that. I’d rather see that than a v12 q7

@@Norwoodg00ner well they couldn't ot was too heavy, complex, expensive and big it baree even fit in the q7 which is a 7 seater suv let alone a 2 door coupe

William Wallace *was crazy enough Audi lost it's balls

Well they wanted to put this engine in the r8 at one point and to me it's still a lost opportunity... a diesel supercar is not something you see everyday...

And then stuff it in a Q7

Don't forget the twin turbos

Fabio Bologna and now Audi put 2.0 Tdi in The Q7... Hello downsizing;(

Michael King they did it because they could race the le mans 24h with the r15 tdi

William Wallace Audi R15 has a V10 actually. It’s the R10 that has a V12

Yes but no. The r10 had a v12 but it was smaller

You're calling 23 mpg decent?

@@Zenithialord I sure do. How many SUV's making in the ballpark of the 493HP it was rated at achieve 23mpg? I don't know of any SUV's of that size making that kind of hp that are getting mileage like that especially in that time frame.

Og>

It does. This was the best looking Q7

This Model was/is the wonderful Designt one!

No. It's the truth.

That’s like saying the shit I dropped today looks better than the log I dumped yesterday.

Yeah quite a beast honestly

Loved the ST220. But blew it up twice as first car 😢💔

​@@marcelk3847twice?! Damn! My uncle had one from 2005 till 2021, lovely car

It'll be better if it did

They should have done it :/

@@stevanzdravkovic835 naaaah

Diesel supercar you mean? They had to put that in a Lambo :))

@@peteparker6879 I wish they had, I can just imagine seeing a Gallardo Rolling Coal in some intersection in Dubai. However they did make a Prototype R8 with this engine.

Hold my 100 liter diesel canister*

@@ilpatongi hold my Fuel Truck

@@macak3140 Basically.

Ognjen Kuzmanović The V12 TDI came out in 2008...not last year...

@@Izzybo8 It's a joke you absolute pineapple

Hahahahaha

You are wrong, your hauling abilities are not constrained by engine torque, but by tyre type/size. If you want to haul stuff, buy a truck, because that audi is not gonna work on loose/muddy surface at all. If you want wheel torque, Soviet Uaз (80hp bus) with great reduction gearbox or Kamaз (60 hp truck used everywhere in postsoviet countries) truck have probably more than this useless Audi

Without Torque, you need very Low Gearing as to not destroy the engine. Low Torque engines can be used to haul stuff but it's not very practical because most of the time it's going to be significantly slower and they may even use more fuel than more torque engine. Right tires are also good but not essential because if it's a heavy load, it will press down on suspension and tires and create more grip that way. Tires are not essential, but it's a lot safer to use the right tyres. A truck is much more versatile than that Audi, that is for sure, but you don't need a truck to haul things for 100 km on a highway and a few dozen meters on gravel. For work, Truck is much better, but if you are on a family vacation and you want to take a boat with you, that Audi will be a better choice because it is more practical for that use. No one at a right mind would use this Audi as a replacement for F-250, but most people don't need a Truck that size- In Europe, roads are narrow and winding so that Audi is much more practical than a Pickup. Quattro AWD is not as good for heavy duty use as something with propper 4X4, but for things, it would be used for, that Quattro is just fine and 4X4 would be redundant, cause no one at a right mind would take that Audi somewhere where that makes a big difference. For its purpose that Audi is very well made.

Not anyone in the entire history of the world bought a posh 100k suv like this to tow

Edim 108 true but nobody in europe (with our fuel prices ) will buy this car, most people here use the q7 3.0 v6 tdi with 200+ hp ( from 204 hp to 280) and in some cases you can see the 4.2 v8 tdi 340hp wich can tow an small boat without any problem, Audi made this car to flex a q7 with a v12 diesel I guess , it will be dope to see one tho I see lot of q7’s of that generation here in spain and the father of my friend has this car with the v6 engine, and it’s surprising how those 3 liters can pull Not just in this model , but in the a6, a7, a8 is the most common engine too, the 3000cc v6 tdi is prolly the best engine audi has made , no need for a big v8 or a fucking v12 hahaha

this is diesel. it has 4,5k rev limiter

Rudpavv Rudpavv Yes I know. Like I said, nobody revs an SUV to 7k rpm, so the diesel version is ideal.

Rudpavv Rudpavv u didnt get it lol

Mubble Mann diesels aren't a rev happy motor, it can't rev to 7. The max it will go up to is 4.5k-5k rpm and that's the reason why diesels have a lot of small gears, we have a GL350 bluetec and it's very easy and effortless to drive with the diesels big torque, light steering wheel and all of the luxuries Mercedes-Benz has to offer. 😊

I know. You're repeating what I just said.

Just cause u have money it dont mean you have to be reckless with spending. It's nice to have a lower fuel consumption in a car. So tired of these damn petrol elitists tbh.

@@FarmYardGaming who said they weren't? Still though, unless you're literally sitting on tens of millions of dollars some restraint is smart. And besides that, on many many car threads there are always people going about saying how diesel is bad etc. I'm just tired of it. Both petrol and diesel has its pros and cons!

@@LGinux *Stares in Jeff Bezos* Nah, I'm kidding there, but I haven't got much of an issue with Diesel, you're right. Both have strengths and weaknesses.

@@FarmYardGaming Diesel engines have no strenght in normal cars at this point in time. Well, apart from just being worse in every possible way

@@FarmYardGaming Go on, write your points.

CalikL Or maybe he realized it's just VAG trash and that even Opel is better than a rebaged VW. He's older and he has more experience, maybe you should consider why he'd make that change from a vehicle your fanboy ass thinks is superior.

Where is the envy in my comment? Or are you just projecting very hard lol

Total Loser Your youtube name reflects the kind of person you are. Bye.

Opel is better than a rebadged VW? XDDDD Opel was and always will be a wannabe luxury car. Shame of the german cars

+blanchbacker Thank god your opinion is wrong and that i will never be retarded enough to ever consider a vehicle made by the VAGina group.

Same. The front is gorgeous. The rear end definitely looks dated though

The generation after this a really boring design just in my opinion. Its meh

the 4.2 tdi wasn't bad either

There’s other cars with the same and even more torque... think G65 AMG or Bentley Mulsanne Speed which has 1100Nm

doomie61 100k £ is affordable?

If it had a tow bar 😂😂

@doomie61 I have seen them using for towing many times

inox1ck Dont forget about the upcoming v12 SUV with 700hp. Top speed will be 39kph. I think they call it Tiger II

You clearly don’t know anything about cars do you? Or was this sarcasm?

Or you are a little kid who thinks he knows everything??

@@arminkkarahasan4796 the joke your head

Well a v8 tri-turbo Q8 has been announced sooo

And no stupid fake exhausts or shit like that !

Breaking Cycles only problem is its an ugly car, it really was very poor styling. The new Q7 has much better proportions, not as vulgar and tacky looking like the old one which are bought my herberts who get high mileage examples about ten years old, then cant afford to have them fixed when a sensor or something goes faulty haha chavs pretending they have money LOL

What do you drive Simon

BMW X5M

Lmao this car is trash, My range beats it's ass.

Except that my '10 Sport Supercharged hasn't had a single issue in over half a year of daily driving, it's faster than the Q7, and the interior is so much nicer.

YES IT IS

😂 your first car was this? Awesome

@@JustGeorgeGG my first car was a 3.0 twin turbo TDI A6 Avant Quattro (obviously modified) (it was from my father)

Jesus, mine was a 1997 Ford Mondeo 2 litre, base model with floatier suspension than a boat

@@HotForgeChaos Mine was a 1992 Rover Metro.

Mine was a VW Saveiro 1.6 😂

Nah they are all downsizing now and it sucks, used to get the 6.2 V8 in Mercedes C63 and E63, now its all 3.0 V6 engines in most of these cars soon it will get even worse. Its government regulations preventing them from doing it.

@@gravemind6536 sounds like us petrolheads need a no limits micronation to import from, and of course, it ought to be members only.

@@gravemind6536 I've heard C63 lost it's soul going to an inline-4 with hybrid technology.

@@hughjassstudios9688 If my N/A 3.2 V6 is welcome then count me in!

@@surena9451 You heard correct, its a 2.0 4 pot hybrid that also weighs 2.1 tonnes, over 400kg more than the old one. Weighs the same as a V12 S600 from the early 2000s too and that car had everything imagineable.

Lucky

pv_plays games came on mine in 2020

Jakeyboi mine too!! 🤔

And me 09/20

October 2020

February 2021

They are the same company Audi is a VW with extras

@@MJ-uk6lu they are not the same Company VW just owns Audi they and my point was that there is a VW V10 tdi and a Audi V12 tdi

Rather accurate comment.

Nah they could never get their cocaine hands on one of these Maybe the 4.2 tdi Most likely the 3.0 tdi lmao

While in fact it looks better than the new one

@@jackdaniels6536 yeah, that didn't age well. first one wasn't prettiest, but current one is a disaster.

@@ivanknjezevic4840 baš tako hehe

@@jackdaniels6536 pa meni je i ovaj novi bas lijep, na prvu mi se nije svidio ali sad mi je bas top, u BiH ima jedan Q7 V12 tdi se prodaje bijeli, za to godiste i dalje izgleda kao da je juce iz fabrike izasao

@@shadowhunter2430 a ček, još prave v12 tdi?

Lol

@@dragospahontu what lol?

Mohamed Patel this needs to be done

They were going to do that with the R8, as an homage to their LMP1 cars from the 2000's, until they couldn't be bothered to modify the chassis enough to fit that giant coal roller. So they just took the Lambo V10 instead.

@@ENKTDeeColon_and_randomnumbers Youre wrong the Engine fitted but the Problem was the Transmission for the 1000NM

@@franklestk3038 Well, Still a massive shame, because imagine a trend of diesel supercars

@@ENKTDeeColon_and_randomnumbers Just Out that engine in a Passat TDI

Alot of us here are like they should have did it but the truth is even tho the tag of "budget super" was placed on it..only the rich could seriously buy one and petrol consumption would be the last thing on their minds when deciding to buy a supercar. It certainly wouldn't make any sense purchasing an r8 new without the beautiful sound of the na v10

@@nsm6526 I love driving diesel for the torque.the mileage is gravy

@@tropicalsnow yea but would you take it over a na screaming v10

it wasn't the only diesel v12 *DETROIT DIESEL 12V71*

DBGalaxy946 ugh Americas need to stop bringing their engines into threads We know all about your hauling ass dodge ram

Carguy69 lol so true !

blödesau69 fax

That was torque he was talking about. The V12 Q7 has 493bhp & 738lb-ft Torque. The Trackhawk has 707bhp & 645lb-ft Torque.

Shona I bet that for less than 10K € in tuning the 6.0 V12 TDI engine would make almost twice the power than stock and almost twice the torque of the trackhawk. All of this while not averaging at 15mpg lmao

@@jonytube more like 8mpg 😂😂

Leave the statue of liberty in the same angle as the tower of pizza

GinGER the real question is why wouldn’t you want 2000Nm of torque? 1500 lb ft for my fellow Americans

Novel.

jamie savage Novel. And highly intuitive of you.

jamie savage I'm reporting you for this. Threatening behaviour is actually a statutory offence.

I know it's the way I roll my friend .. always offering to be a good Samaritan in the time of need of a stranger ... p.s stop looking at this beast of a vw toureg you can't afford it so stop pretending pal .

behave your self be calm I COME IN PEACE ! I WOUDNT HURT A FLY

You fucking dumbass, this car is from 2009 and it is an diesel, can your gay svr tow a jumbo jet? No.

yes he is.. he totally forget for 5000+ lbs or more that 2,3 tons of mass

audi is heavier and its diesek dumbass

dumbass...

Tesla Model S.

Benefit money gone to waste

Corsa15DT It was all scripted

Stefan W. and the q3 or q5

@Alex Lol you say to him that he is poor and when you realize he is not you play the "i dont care" card.... You are pethetic dude, you are all over this comment section, get a life mate.... No everyone loves BMW, Audi or Mercedes so quit calling people poor.

@Alex Ive red pretty much every single comment of yours, and i can tell that you not open minded at all. And yes you can love something you cant afford, i love Pagani and Koenigsegg and i cant afford them, thats just your stupid, ignorant mentality and lack of culture that makes you think like that. I dont like BMW, Mercedes and i think Audi is the worst premium german brand on the market, legit doesnt care about making a good car, they only care about money and thats it. *It doesnt fucking matter what car he drives!!!! Ye can still hate or love a brand....* *Stop thinking like an ignorant....and grow the fuck up.* I will get not very far in life? I already made it very far.... And i have no problem with you saying your POV, my problem is when you start insulting people over a stupid pice of metal and plastic....

Bright Ivan your wrong, you could say that the RS6 is faster than some modern day Lamborghinis and that it’s the fastest production estate ever....

@@Nolongrused fun fact: RS6 is the newest among it and M5 and E63S Estate but its also the slowest. M5 and E63S totally smoked the RS6.

@@brightivan you're correct, I own a Rs5 2018, quicker than the m3 & c63 in drag race, once its gets over 70mph,they pull alot more

When this video was uploaded I was 20 😂😂

That isn't true at all. The point of a diesel is one thing. Fuel mileage. You can easily build gas engines to pull just as well as any diesel, just not with decent mileage. People have this thought as well that diesels naturally make more torque and it just isn't true. This one at hand produces (yet limited to) 1000NM/738FT LBS of torque at 38psi. The current Power Stroke if I recall makes those numbers at 30psi. You could easily build a 6.7L gas engine that makes 925FT LBS of torque at around 20psi. Bentley has a 6.75L V8 that makes 811 Tq at 20psi with ancient technology and compression ratio that is from the 80's.

Michael King um wrong, maybe in Europe a diesel is supposed to get better fuel mileage. In America, all Diesel engine are made to do is tow many tons. Fuel mileage is just a bi product because diesel takes longer to burn

@@derbyjr actually, he is right, yoz can make it with a gas engine as well, physics do not change when you cross the ocean.. a diesel has a high comptession rate, thats were the low torque comes from and additionally, diesel has a higher density, so a gallon of diesel is more mass than a gallon of gas, just like different types of wood burn at different rates so( a pile of pine will not last as long as a pile of oak, if the same size).. if you try to build a low torque gas engine you get in the low 1 digit mpg.. so, it's just more economic

No, wrong on your part. If you think the manufactures can't build a gas engine to haul big loads you'd be out of your mind. They just can't do it with reasonable fuel mileage. Even the Ford V10 is rated for 30,000lb and it is very weak in power for it's size. To build a gas powered engine to haul 80,000 lbs like a big rig wouldn't be that hard with today's technology. To build one that does it with decent fuel economy however just isn't going to happen. The 8.1L was poorly built and had no problem towing as well as the Duramax at that time. The Duramax just did it with roughly double the fuel economy.

you people are so sad lol

And also useless

Lion King HD well so r u

It’s really ridiculous. I drove it and it is insane. Just so weird having such a heavy car go that fast.

@@gymweeb9229 Not as surprising if you have been in a 2 tonne Merc SL 65 AMG which can go way faster.

AG19RDR the one I drove was tuned though.

@@gymweeb9229 lmao a Q7 V12 tuned? I imagine it having like 1200 Nm of torque. Or 1500 Nm like the Veyron has... :-/

He said zonda R

@@thekuca8077 Zonda AAAAAH

cardudes google it. Series 14 episode 4

Spring and episode IV revenge of the sith

Shazzkid That joke was so funny I forgot to laugh.