+luise cobian You need a prohibited weapon permit for a slingshot and Nunchaku

hahah actually loled

Hahaha fuck that was good 10/10

there scared if the ppl take the country back

luise cobian pretty stark contrast here in the US.

OfficialMINIm: Yup. For example, If you keep an aluminum baseball bat by your bedside to defend your home, you are in the act of committing a violent FELONY in the eyes of the law in Australia.

OfficialMINIm I know it's fucking stupid... people here in Aus are saying America is so dangerous, yet in Australia people can acquire an unregistered gun very easily and then kill you in your own home & you can't do anything about it... it's fucking ridiculous

OfficialMINIm im pretty sure you can actually use a baton in Australia

Just welcome the crims with a red carpet and some entertainment mate. Let them take all your belongings peacefully. Sigh!

@@profile1561 A baton is a restricted item you need a licence to own one. IF it has a handle on it ,then it is illegal.

What happened to F and G? That’s alphabetical discrimination.

ColdWarWarriors I just watched a video

ColdWarWarriors well the reason for that is that in australia there is a self defence laws where you can defend yourself if a person is attempting to invade your home or may cause dammage to property or yourself now i do agree that the buy back program in australia is not a result of less crime but the self defence laws is mostly the reason the crime in australia hasnt changed il show a link that does provide a bit of back story that gets to the point en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-defence_(Australia)

i understand it to be its because thats the police's job, otherwise whats to stop you from "inviting" some you dont like over then shooting them and accusing them of X,Y,Z just to be justified in offing some bloke. whether thats the reason or not i dont know. I actually just got my A/B licence last month, I keep my safe in the she of the other side of our block. so it'd be no good for home defence anyway, plus i live in the middle of fucking nowhere, like dont even bother to lock your doors nowhere, unless i realllllllly piss of the only other bloke in town im pretty safe from homes invaders

@@yareyare_dechi what if someone manages to sneak into your shed and shoot you with your own gun? You should keep the safe in your house mate.

@@tortellini7272 thank's for your concern, but I live in a small rural town of like less that 600 people. no one knows I have fire arms. And to even get to them they'd need to get through 5 locks (2 for the shed, the safe, the safe in the safe where i keep the bolts and then the separate ammo safe). That's atleast a solid inch worth if steel if they want to try to cut them out. so unless they have invented a silent angle grinder I'm pretty confidemt it's not really a concern. Not to mention I live in Australia where we aren't so flooded with guns that we need to shoot first, assume they're armed later. Not to mention my room is like 30 metres from the shed

Brandon Barkman I’m British and I am thinking the same! Semi auto rimfire with no restriction on mag sizes is the bread and butter of British rifle shooting, but it sounds like the Australian MPs think it is a serious issue. I find it odd that Aussies can have centerfire because they fancy it (recreational use) yet semi auto rimfire seems to need much more validation and even then is crippled by mag size.

Yeah right bruh. We ain’t much better in Canada. We can’t even buy compacts here? So dumb.

Don't feel bad, we're doing fine down here.

Thanks…

The US has had background checks for years now. You cannot buy from a licensed dealer without having an FBI background check completed… unfortunately you along with others have been tricked to believe that there are no backgrounds checks in the US because Obama keeps saying he wants them… what he actually wants is registration so he can set up the building blocks for confiscation in the future. He just calls it 'background checks' so it's a feel-good catch phrase that the majority of the public won't argue with… But take a look at the FBI's website and you can clearly see the requirements for background checks to be completed before anyone can legally purchase from a dealer, also several laws prohibiting people from legally obtaining a firearm, such as criminals, age restrictions and so forth…

***** The gunlaws could be more tighter

but the background checks in the US are a 5 minute phone call to the fbi and a fee along with your purchase, not months of waiting, and license after license. unless you live in new york city where the protectionists have run rampant, where the law is basically the same as australia. and by the way, when the apocalypse comes, you aussies with bolt actions will easily outlive the american "preppers" with all their tactical crap.

ammo will be extremely scarce, few firearms for the general public, rioting will ensue much quicker than in the us, BUT the aussie spirit shall live on. also, we have many more deadly wild predators in australia, yet we have a ridiculously limited capacity to aquire much more useful guns.

Yep, shooters need to make a stand or else they will take everything you have…

Nirvana cana It got my blood boiling listening to it. And I have a feeling that the laws work mainly in theory ( it's for the commons imo), with a few politicians and wealthy individuals laughing maniacally as they themselves get possession. But that is mostly speculative. Many in the US who are fighting our ATF and the gun laws here have a reasonable suspicion that there have been full auto weapons which were registered after the 1986 closing of the registry and have made their way into the hands of politicians or wealthy political donors.

+Nirvana cana Is the NRA around up there?

@@billhill7330 We have the CCFR (Canadian Coalition for Firearms Rights) but they're not as powerful as the NRA in America

@walker jfs But if those creatures win, and they institute their (mainly hidden) policy in the US, then the current outrage in Australia will become even worse.

same as knifes open carry can in fact get you in trouble

category Z

Hhahaahahhahaha! You have a valid point!

+johan van der sandt It's illegal to defend yourself with guns,knives,batons,pepper sprays,mace,batons in Australia. Our laws favour the strong,idiots say grandmothers should take up MMA for self defence.

+johan van der sandt We don't have so many school shootings it's considered a fashion either

+GeneralG1810 We never had any school shootings before our 1996 gun laws, Monash university shooting happened after our 1996 gun laws.

+AL71313 why ban certain type of guns? Why, not have a 6 month cool off period by law and have a psychological screening before purchase? An ar-15 is really not a military gun unless its automatic.

Pretty much. I am sincerely hoping that can be changed in the near future.

archangele1 what a joke. Australia is a nanny state with draconian laws. NY too seems to suck

I keep my gun in the vegetable crisper.

I'm fine that semi-autos are in a different catagory from a bolt action.

Motorcycle license categories, similar over regulation. Not necessary IMHO.

You're welcome, glad you got something from it...

Thanks for watching and your comment… now to answer your question, yes there are big push backs and we now have a handful of politicians from pro-gun parties in power which is an advantage. There are a couple of main issues, firstly the years of media brainwashing by presenting misleading information to the masses and secondly, shooters in this country are too divided and not doing enough as one to send a clear message to politicians that this is no longer acceptable. I started this channel 2 years ago in a hope to bring shooters together and start showing the real side of shooting which is just a whole heap of fun as we all know. So far it's working well and I hope to continue with the support of viewers to bring more and more shooters together in this country, then we can act as one and start getting changes in our favour…

***** Got it. Good luck and God bless. You are an admirable man. All the best. Subscribed.

Thank you Sir! I appreciate that…!

Thanks Brent...

Thanks for your comment Josh...

Mike, some people here have waiting several months for a licence and several months for a permit to acquire on top of that…!

Mike Price That's just for air rifles. If you want an air pistol it would be around a year in my state. It's an absolute joke. Even in Britain they sell them in toy stores.

@ekflpkf And airsoft is completely illegal.

@@zhukie Do you hate that it's illegal?

@ekflpkf I thought it was

I agree with you 100% mate… the laws have done nothing for public safety here and I addressed that on my Facebook page recently… (quoting the figures and stats)

***** Yeah I find the anti-gun community to be rather sensitive when one starts producing facts that conflict with their thoughts about ideal utopia where disarmed citizens just sitting around holding hands and singing folk songs about peace, love and harmony. I swear they're deep into the drug trade and partaking in some seriously potent stuff.

Nick U. This was a post I recently put on my Facebook page in response to some anti-gunners… "This is the reply for the anti-gunners that have decided to grace us with their wisdom… I'm posting it here so everyone (pro or anti gun) can see the real figures... Re: your knife vs gun comment, why is any death or injury to innocent people acceptable? You say "if you come at me with a knife, I have a chance to defend myself" but you're not for self defence or is self-defence ok so long as it's not with a gun? Have you ever tried to defend yourself against a knife attack? Unless you have a high skill set that only 1% of the population possess, it is near on impossible to avoid being slashed by a knife in an attack… I'm sure those of you in LE on here can support this, I believe it is standard training across Australia if you a presented with a knife then you are taught to respond with a firearm due to a deadly threat? So why is it ok for LE personnel to possess a firearm to protect their lives from a deadly threat yet if a civilian is presented with that same threat, they have to just hope for the best? I understand where you are coming from, saying that in a rampage a firearm has the potential to cause more death, but once again as I mentioned, how many law-abiding people do you see doing these rampages? So in your anti-gun belief, lets take all the guns off civilians, security, police and anyone else here in Australia, tell me how you suggest to handle a criminal with a firearm? Or on a lesser scale, if you only believe in taking the firearms off all the law-abiding shooters here, next time there's a shooting, who will you blame then? Re: your comment "I am not going to comment on stats (gathered from the FBI) presented by a hunting and shooting organisation", unlike the anti-gunners who rely on emotion to push their agenda, let's look at the Australian Institute of Criminology who source their figures from the Australia Bureau of Statistics www.aic.gov.au/dataTools/facts/weaponUseTrend.html 1) Weapon use trends - Homicide with a firearm 1995 = 59 deaths, 1996 (which includes Port Arthur) = 98, 1997 = 75, 1998 = 54, 1999 = 61, 2000 = 59, 2001 = 49, 2002 = 42, 2003 = 38, 2004 = 33, 2005 = 26, 2006 = 46, 2007 = 34, 2008 = 31, 2009 = 30, 2010 = 39, 2011 = 41. So my original point was very true and valid. The average trend pre-96 was downwards and continues on an average downward spiral to the present day with a few spikes, but overall anyone can clearly see that I am not making this up. What annoys me is the anti-gun lobby love to claim the downward spiral average since 96 as being due to the implementation of the 96 gun laws, when it's got nothing to do with them. If that was the case why was the previous year in 1995 only 59 deaths? I have seen the previous pre-96 years stats and it's the same, it's been coming down on average and your claim to fame of the 96 gun laws as being a success couldn't be further from the truth. According to the Bureau of Statistics the 1996 gun buy-back cost the Australian tax payer just over 304 million dollars ($304368776 to be exact). I'm sorry but I can't see the benefit of over $304 million dollars in wastage because of one person's actions. How's those gun laws working to reduce the already dropping homicides with firearms? 2) Looking at the same page, it's interesting to see that knife homicides are roughly twice that of a firearm homicide. Why don't the anti-gunners out there push for a national knife buy-back, because they are responsible for twice the number of deaths here in Australia? Then take a look at the knife use in Robberies as apposed to firearm use, it's roughly 4 times the amount of firearm use! Re: your comment about gun policy.org, I'm glad you mentioned that site… It is run by Philip Alpers who works for the University of Sydney promoting anti-gun policies. So you had a go at me for referencing stats from a firearm organisation, so why should anyone here believe the stats from an anti-gun website like gun policy.org? What qualifications does Philip have to claim he is a researcher & policy analyst, firearms injury prevention (1996) or a gun policy researcher (1997). He refers to attending university "without enrolling" where he "did drugs and university by day" and worked part-time by night (North & South Magazine July 1991). He appears to have then dropped out to "move on the fringes of the hippy drug world" (NZ Listener 24 October 1987) and to later become a radio DJ is Gisborne. So I find it hard to take onboard any of his anti-gun stories, why doesn't he cover the hundreds of pro-gun stories where law-abiding people have defended their lives with a firearm, after-all Philip claims to provide a fair and balanced viewpoint on his website… Your other stats you're quoting from gun policy is severely flawed… why not provide these stats with the CDC in the US or the Institute of Criminology here in Australia? Re: your comment about suicide and people with a plan to suicide and a gun in the home are 7x more likely to have a plan to use the firearm then those without a firearm in the home. What does this prove? If a person is going to suicide with a gun, knife or hanging, what difference does your anti-gun policy have on suicides? Let's take a look shall we… In Australia in 2012, a total of 2535 people suicided, 1379 by hanging, 582 by poisoning, 173 by firearms, 166 by other methods, 112 by falls, 79 with sharp objects and 44 by drowning www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/3303.0~2012~Main%20Features~Method%20of%20Suicide~10011. So is that justification for taking firearms from the law-abiding is it? Let's take rope and poison away first… Re: your comment about you had an uncle in the USA who told you getting a firearm was easy. Is that it? Seriously, after I explained exactly the steps and laws in place in the USA, you base your whole argument on firearms are too easy to get in the USA on your uncle telling you so? I explained the exact laws as they apply to the USA from personal experience, I have been there, I have lived there… look up the laws there and you will clearly see them as I described... Re: your comment about my outrageous comment of firearms in the hands of the law-abiding pose no threat, once again let's take a look at the stats. Here in Australia in 2012 there were 4 accidental deaths with firearms, the lowest of any other method, so really, once again we're going to ban guns from the law-abiding are we when firearm accidents are the lowest recorded of all methods? www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/3303.0~2012~Main%20Features~Method%20of%20Suicide~10011 Re: your comment about how can relaxing gun laws do any good. Well show me justification that the gun laws we have here in Australia have done anything to increase public safety? How are these laws working to stop criminals obtaining firearms nowadays? Re: your comment about "making us all safer which we are" as a response to my original question of why the big push to disarm all the law-abiding shooters. This shows your true colours, like every anti-gun person I've met, they always try to gain your confidence by saying my Dad has guns for his farm or I believe in firearms for pest control etc when really that's not the truth at all. Look at your comment, you do believe in gun confiscation despite the Australian stats I have clearly presented to you show you have no case to your argument which leads me to my final question, Why are you and your friend even bothered to be on a Facebook page designed for law-abiding shooters in this country?"

Thanks for the info. That was an eyeful to take in. :)

Hi mate, if you want to send me a PM with your email in it I'll send you a study I did on Australian gun control. You might like to have a read.

They don't go far enough I think we should totally ban guns, the only people that can be trusted are police and the military. I believe we can create a world were we do not even have the need for a military. In fact I support de militarisation of Australia

Amen, from 7th Gen. Aussie with ex servicemen in family line

@@jasoar1563 you are deluded

Same thing here in Germany.

Yes it is happening slowly down here...

Uniting is quite difficult, as there are a bajillion smaller political parties, so everyone is constantly divided, also, the parties can instantly change their leadership, policy, and membership at any time, and that is why we have had so many prime ministers.

@@ozziereviews unfortunately it is slowly getting worse not better :(

@@gmakcon yep, gel blasters…

Dude, sorry, but if you dont want to move to Australia because the gun laws are to restrictive, then we dont want you here.

Yep, they had to make it that way to deter people which was their goal...

It’s not like you need it, like at all.

Not at all… and it's proven, take the Sydney siege incident we had this December, the islamic extremist was in possession of a pump-shotgun which is a restricted category-c firearm banned from sports/recreational use in 1996, so how did those gun laws stop a criminal obtaining an already restricted firearm??? This just proves it, the gun laws do nothing for public safety… surprise surprise the criminal didn't have a gun licence nor was the shotgun legal but you still see these idiot anti-gunners jumping up and down saying how registration, licensing and so forth works to stop gun crime… in reality it doesn't and this incident was just a perfect example of that!

I figured as much. You have to understand here in the states we are always sold bullshit lies as truth. When I listened to Obama talk and praise the gun control in your country he as many other politicians did, make it seem as though all the people living there LOVED the idea and crime went down immediately and everything worked so well. I didn't believe a second of it and it didn't make sense to me. I live in New Jersey. Here we can own almost all types of firearms but can't carry them as you can in other states and we are trying to change that so being at that stage and then listening to what you had to say was really eye opening. Are any of your politicians trying to change the gun law back? Or at least more to your favor?

Dj Heil I know I don't have to tell you, but don't believe for a second what comes out of Barry Obama's mouth as gospel… The anti-gun lobby will quote all these figures of how the gun crime here in Australia has dropped since 96, but it has been coming down at the same rate prior to 96, they just don't publicise the stats from pre 96… The gun laws here don't work and have nothing to do with public safety, any shooter will explain that with factual examples… all it was in 96 was a bunch of anti-gun lobbyists getting that excited that they finally had a massacre to dance in the blood of victims and push their agenda… still we see continual gang related shootings on the nightly news (none of which are by law-abiding shooters obviously) and the government (because they don't know how to tackle the illegal firearm issue) come out with stupid statements like "we're reviewing the firearm laws and plan to tighten licensing etc" so that everyone "feels good" that the government are doing something when in reality it has absolutely no impact on the criminal element… I really believe your biggest threat in the US is the Bloomberg regime as money combined with emotion based comments influences the many people, even if it isn't the truth! Don't listen to them when they say we have never had a massacre in Australia since the 1996 gun laws, because it's not true, there have been plenty of shootings but the media don't report any of them as massacres… I am a proud life member of the NRA and I will give my support to you guys however possible, it would be an absolute shame to see the US fall to propaganda that's being pushed out by Bloomberg…

I would like to say that I like the fact in Australia that we have the ability to purchase and use firearms, I think it is right that it be regulated and restricted. I think that you only run into problems with regulation if you intent to use these items for a 'non genuine reason' and that it is most peoples desire for self defence that bring them into conflict with the regulations. I have lived in the US and Australia and I love both countries, however as a citizen of Australia I take some comfort in the reduced mass shootings or even perceived safety. There will always be a criminal element, there will always be tragedy involving firearms (sydney siege), however any system that allows its citizens to use the items appropriately while taking them out of the hands or making harder to obtain for the violent, insane or mental ill is worth preserving or at least perfecting. Basically if you are a law abiding not insane person you can follow the rules and use these items, and if you are anything but law abiding or not insane then it should be damn near impossible. And if your reason is just own these items to feel safe then I worry thats when accidents happen. I don't mind jumping through hoops to prove i'm not insane. Just my opinion, but I would like to say that I liked the explanation in this video, I think it was very well done.

Brett Watson don't you see a common thread here when it comes to gun laws? It's the exact same fear in the US as Australia. It's never been the "restrictions" it's always been the type and who it restricts. If the restrictions places worked on criminals I'd be all for them but they don't. They are criminals and don't follow the law. The only people gun laws effect are those who follow the law. So if the availability of guns is the same for criminals because they were getting them illegal in the first place but harder for honest citizens who wins?

No problem…!

Whenever i need a good laugh,I listen to americans talk about 'the land of the free' hahahahaha. Y'all some battery hens. Pathetic how so many people can be so blind. Enjoy your massacres! Im just sitting here with my popcorn watching the show. Bravo!!

+Black Rifles Matter your gun laws didnt save sandy hook kids did they? How many others were saved by your gun laws? Its always the cops that save the day. Look at Nice....the cops got them.... I couldnt believe someone would be stupid enough to say what you did. Then i realise,you are american. Its wierd. About 11 days into september,theres always lots of bbq's and parties. Wierd

MrSardine23 Those childeren were slaughtered in yet another "gun free" zone. Guns were not allowed there. So why don't you tell me, what good did that rule do?

2amendmentrulz and when I want a good laugh I just look up all the massacres The US has had obviously I don't actually laugh, I just find it really sad. you guys hade 133 mass shootings in 14 years(2000 to 2014). we have had 0 in 20(2000 to 2016) years, since the gun laws were introduced, evidently they work

Levi Voltz Actually there have been a number of mass shootings since 1996 (Hectorville, Monash University, and Sydney Cafe Siege just to name a few), not to mention the pretty horrible arson attack massacres (Churchill and Quaker Hill Nursing Home). Couple this with the fact that the crime rate is rising with home invasions, rapes, robberies, assaults, and muggings, and the murder rate hasn't really changed at all. It's about the same as it was before the 1996 legislation. So no I don't think your argument is a good case for the strict laws working. What's really sad is morons like you continue to trade liberty for a false perception of "safety" and in the end you end up with neither.

Still accurate but yes I agree if I'm licensed for it, why can't I take it to a range to sight it in? But common sense has nothing to do with these gun laws...

LOL yeah it took some concentrating !

it would have, but you did a great job and made a great video !

Lac Max Thanks mate...

Ps How does inheriting firearms work over there? Are you able to pass a firearm on to your sons or daughters and just keep passing it down to the family or does it turn into a hefty amount of red tape and how difficult is this process to get through and how likely are most people going to succeed with it?

+NormanJaydendy Ratzzilla Thanks for your comments mate, no it has not changed the already downward trent in gun homicide in Australia, it is at the same rate pre-1996 to post-1996. The antis love to claim that it is due to the 1996 gun laws but that's false. If you'd like to see more on stats and links, take a look at my 'Failure of the National Firearms Agreement' video and click the link to my template letter in the description field. You will see my submission and ALL links to the real stats about gun crime here in Australia. As for inheriting a firearm, you would need to be licensed and pay for a permit to acquire to have the firearm, which will only be issued after the police at the firearms registry determine it's ok for you to have it... The red tape down here is ridiculous, all that was needed after 1996 was a licensing system to prevent metal ill people and criminals from legally walking into a gun store and purchasing a firearm. All this other rubbish of restrictions and categories has no affect on public safety when it's only licensed law abiding shooters that are affected. Take a look at New Zealand for example, one of closest neighbours... they got rid of long arm registration in the early 80s and you can own semi-auto rifles, shotguns and even buy a suppressor without a licence! They also allow full-auto firearms on a collectors licence there, yet they have a lower per capita death rate with firearms then we do in Australia (I also address this in my template letter). The laws in Australia are too over the top and setup by a previous prime minister who openly stated that he hated guns and believed that only the police and military should have them. So what do we have now? Continual news stories of criminals using firearms to commit robberies, drive by shootings and occasional homicides, meanwhile us the law abiding licensed shooter, continually gets punished with more and more restrictions whenever a criminal does something with a firearm. It is ridiculous and as a life member of the NRA, I agree and support the NRA's stance on 'no compromise' because if you give in to the antis or even allow any restriction, they will just keep going til you have nothing left...

"cost of this system outweighs its benefits" How would the cost of 36,000 lives per year be calculated

Take away there body guards , invite the criminals to lunch . I think you folks would be better off becoming a criminal as they have it made.

Apply the same standards as they are applying to Red Flag laws.

Faz Anisi Much more! And airsoft is legal where it isn't in Aust. I was airsoft pistols in Rotorua in a fishing tackle sports shop and was amazed lol

zhukie​ Makes me proud to be a Kiwi....we're pretty laid back

Faz Anisi And your politicians never went batshit insane after Aramoana, like Howard did here

Yeah common sense...I nearly laughed how liberal NZ is with gun policy

@@TheCaptainFaz spoke to soon mate, herd its fucked now after Christchurch

No problems, as for the pest control, I get asked this almost daily… I had a lot of property owners that wanted to hire me, so it just went from there...

Alright cool thanks.

+Shane Colquhoun No problem Shane, a hint for you tho, do you're cat-b safety course and get your a/b licence because if the antis get this new National Firearms Agreement through, a lot of repeating air-rifles will no longer be in cat-a but will be cat-b...

+ozziereviews no more air rifles now? What about the terrorism at 🇫🇷 France? It can happen here in Aus 🇦🇺 too...

+ozziereviews what rifles can we own, like police are allowed with? Because there Arsenal got upgraded because of the 🇫🇷 French attacks.

You're confusing me with this question? This video spells out everything you can own and for what reason, I can't make it any clearer...

***** sorry, short internet attension span... I'll watch it. It's just that France have got upgraded and such and they've been talking stuff.

Yeah it was like that in Australia once upon a time but no longer… If Barry Obama has his way he'd love to see our gun laws over in the US, but I can't see it happening overnight, just keep your eyes and ears open to the falsities being pumped out by the Bloomberg regime - money and emotion based stories have a lot of influence on people, so I hope you guys continue to repel it…!

Texas makes the top 10 in Gun Murders out of the 50 US states. And top 15 in all murders. Almost 5 times the murder rate of Australia. Call that safe? I feel safer over here thanks.

ConfederateFiringZone M1919 Damn Skippy!!!

Nebrox you have to take in the consideration of the illegals and the illegal gun trafficing in Texas. Also...the 3 huge ass cities here and the sheer size of Texas gives it a top placing in almost any statistic. It is 1 of the safest states in the union due to citizen gun ownership.

No problem...

+Aleksfoxtrot Yes it is a massive difference but what hurts me is thinking back to when firearm ownership was very open here in Australia to now... don't give the antis in the US an inch!

+ozziereviews we'll do our best. really appreciated the video. you obviously have your head on straight and shouldn't be limited in your Firearms. like you vids.

BasswoodJack Where do you live?

BasswoodJack "hardly anyone can have one" isn't true at all. Nearly 900,000 (and quickly climbing) Australians are legal gun owners.

Having to have a license to carry is so stupid. I'm blessed I can carry in all 50 states, but I wish all states were like the 5 that have constitutional carry so everyone could carry across the board.

BasswoodJack This is completely the point - make us jump through so many hoops and make the cost of all the club/peak body/licensing/PTAs fees so exorbitant that only the most dedicated with stick with it. Although despite all that there are more leaglly owned guns in Aust than before 1996 and we have more than 800,000 licensed shooters.

>Those restrictions make owning a gun such a pain in the ass hardly anyone can have one. This is ENTIRELY the whole point.

In 1774, England banned guns & gunpowder in the 13 American colonies. April 19 1775, 8-900 English soldiers start gun confiscation in Concord & Lexington Green Mass. These were the first 2 battles of that 8 year war for independence that England almost won. This ended America's colonial history (1580, 1607-1776).

Treated as category A if it is a rifle category H if its a black powder handgund

For memory some muzzle loaders produced before a certain year (I cant remember the year) don't need to be registered. Other black powder firearms are treated like rifles and hand guns.

+Kellett781 BB and airsoft guns are banned here.

fuck.... really? Damn.

In 1774 England banned guns & gunpowder in the 13 American colonies. April 19 1775, 8-900 English soldiers started gun confiscation in Concord & Lexington Green Mass. These were the first 2 battles of that 8 year long war for independence that England almost won. Gun banning & attempted gun confiscation ended America's colonial history (1585, 1607-1776). England was planning to make serfs, peasants & slaves out of the American colonists like in the dark middle ages in Europe !!!!!

+DRYUEN there is a lot of confusion about them hence why I did the video, thanks for watching

dare colbert But you can have guns in Australia. Sure, the laws are bullshit but it's not that difficult to buy a gun legally. Nearly 900,000 Australians are gun owners.

You can also have full autos in America if you jump through a lot of legal bullshit.

dare colbert Yeah, but you can still own them. And it's not that bad here. I got my first gun within three weeks after applying for a license and sitting an incredibly easy safety test.

Rob Mcfarlane Which state when i reach 18 i plan on getting a A & B licence.

gesman5000 Victoria. Good luck getting your license.

Check any freedom index. Go on 😂

adiintel1 Man that sucks. Come to the Southern US where you can own any fire arm you want. You can even get machine guns but its a little tricky.

15 mins to Get your Rifle 0_0 the fastest it took me was 4 days! but i live In the N.T northern territory most easiest place in Australia to get your firearm licence and rifle/shotgun im not to sure about handguns but 15 MINS thats Super quick! my mate who lives in Arizona said i should com visit him and his family in the states heard use are real big on the old hunting We love it to in Australia I do pig shooting and bufflo mostly with a bow but i like my Rifles just as much! :)

adiintel1 You need to check out one of our gun shows, you would literally crap yourself.

adiintel1 You said you hunt with a bow, So I made a 44" wooden bow. Would I have to register or anything for my wooden bow?

H Tucker nah no riegstration for a bow i heard there pushing for a law like that in W.A

Honestly,its not that bad. We adjust. I havnt realy travelled much,but i can honestly say iv never ever worried about being shot. My good mate went to the states and was eating across the road from a gun shop that had a sign saying "glocks 30% off" and a bunch of crips hanging nearby... He is a unit but was pretty worried. Here in oz,nah. Maybe stabbed? A lot of people look down on us for our tough laws,but we dont have to worry about things many others do. Its the lebs or bikes shooting eachother that we hear about

MrSardine You are full of shit. FYI Crip gang members with criminal records would not have been legally able to purchase those "30% off Glocks" in your bullshit story. Oh and most shootings in the US are gang and drug related that place in cities with strict gun laws.

I wish we had your stores. (I was gonna be funny but I can't remember the Saints Row gun store OR the name of the GTA store)

JordyT1998 Our stores look pretty much like those minus the grenades and rocket launchers (sadly) lol.

Mike B aww! XD that's fucking awesome though.. is the customer just as awesome like in GTA V.. there awesome!

+Mike B yeah I wish we had shootings every week as well

+Joe Bill You would to if you had a highly diverse population of 330 million people (15 million of them illegal), and millions of them under the poverty line.

In 1774, England banned guns & gunpowder in the 13 American colonies. April 19 1775, 8-900 English soldiers start gun confiscation in Concord & Lexington Green Mass. These were the first 2 battles of that 8 year long war for independence that England almost won.These ended America's colonial history (1580, 1607-1776).

+Chris Watson and that's EXACTLY what the government wants you to do too... I'd prefer to jump through the hoops and that way you strengthen licensed shooters numbers and help us fight the restrictions in the future...

England in 1774 banned guns & gunpowder in the 13 American colonies. April 19 1775, 8-900 English solders started gun confiscation in Concord & Lexington Green Mass. These were the first 2 battles of that 8 year long war that England almost won. So gun banning & attempted gun confiscation ended America's colonial history (1585, 1607-1776). England was planning to make serfs, peasants &slaves out of the American colonists-FYI !!!!!

You can have 45 diameter for sports/target. If you have an occupational handgun licence or a collectors handgun licence, none of that applies...

there is no point in wa

Are you in Queensland Jimmy?

In NSW

I don't know the legislation down there mate sorry… but surely you would be permitted to stop to fuel the car, eat and so forth?!

NSW, directly to where you are permitted to use the firearm, can't leave your car unattended, not even to get something to eat.

223 is a bit light for pigs. They have a habit of wallowing in mud and when it dries its like armor plate. Good cheap and popular round though. I reckon you will probable end up with a .22 and perhaps a 308. Good luck!