Please@@ChucklesMcGurk contact us, we surely can find better solution with your skill and experience

Too bad passengers have a hard time understanding why weight & balance is a critical issue and could even be the reason why their bag didn’t get put on the plane.

Have you even seen that "strange object" passing the screen from right to left at high speed about 17-18 seconds into the clip??

Yeahh!!.. And the ufo between 16 and ...18 seconds into the clip... from upper right corner downto into the left!..........

@@Cheicha62 That was a bird...they fly quite fast across the screen all the time

They are designed to do it, not only climb but they can take off with single engine in case when engine fails when plane is still on the ground but there is not enough airstrip to stop the plane.

MTOW is 187 tons. that is a lot of weight for one engine to climb away with.

Not climbing

It’s probably one of the most simulator practiced emergencies. Without that single engine performance, they would never get an airworthiness certificate.

Aircraft singular...they aren't aircraftS

Was surprised how long it took to shut that engine down

The difference is that the pilots know the aircraft can climb on one engine absolutely fine so they remain calm. Passengers panic not knowing the facts. Still absolute respect to them!

@@Rainman63x Yeah. They are probably more worried about the paperwork after they land.

Watch the clip (again) between 16-18 seconds?!!!!..From right upper corner to the left!,,,....

I think they have practice this failure in simulators 23423423423 times. They know what to do.

They did a good job but there was no standard phraseology in there. No Mayday, no Pan Pan…they started calling themselves emergency aircraft which is not how they are trained.

I agree that the crew's response was commendable in handling the emergency situation. While they did a good job, it's also important to note that standard phraseology can play a crucial role in ensuring effective communication during such incidents. .@@iain8837

@@iain8837that’s not how that works. It’s only mayday when everything isn’t working and you are likely to crach. There’s a difference between sqauking 7700 vs 7600

@@Porsche4life That’s exactly how it works! Mayday Mayday Mayday is a way of telling everyone, ATC, other pilots etc that you aren now an emergency aircraft, the airport closes to all other aircraft and you are priority. It’s 3 short words. It’s not that you will likely crash!! Pan Pan Pan would probably be the best call here. Changing your phraseology to we are now an “emergency aircraft” doesn’t tell anybody much, and it would fail you the check ride every 6 months.

@@iain8837get a grip, delta isn’t failing your ride for saying emergency aircraft instead of mayday or declaring an emergency. It’s not standard but this is insane Monday morning quarterbacking

YES!

Not sure I agree w/ the speed of the emergency vehicles. They took their time getting there and being in place for action. No significant speed of approach until long after the plane had come to a halt. Suppose the engine had decided to catch on fire at that particular time of landing ? Emerg. vehicles were nowhere near the aircraft in question.

@@timmellin2815 You do realise they can't begin to operate when the engines are still runing?

😂

Warp speed

Imagine sitting on the window seat right side from the wing to the back and seeing that black smoke come out.

​@@zoso73I'd freak out.

Yeah with that black smoke you think it will explode any minute ( Turbine)

Pilots. Plural.

Had to put it down hard. No easy go around on one engine

You worry when both engines fail at the same time under take off.

Were there Bulgarians on Board?

What applause are you hearing? There’s no cheering. Just a bunch of professionals doing what they’re trained to do.

And great ATC too!

Shocking. It’s almost like they train for it.

Pilot did his/her job, the most trained situation in their career.

In the event of 1 engine failure, they operated rather routinely strictly according to the operating instructions, but they certainly landed manually.

If you fly a plane with two engines, almost 3/4 of your training is how to manage flying it with one

ATC asked it them later, when they have already done their checklists.

@@altavelmcnamara yup, once they had the important stuff done. Great stuff from atc.

Actually, it was totally sane. Professional, rational, and according to the book. Insanity is the last thing you need in an aircraft emergency!

where is my daily dose of aviation 😂😂

Perhaps because they practice for thousands of times for this eventuality, and before EVERY TAKEOFF, they have a specific briefing in case of engine failure.

Sure :)

SCARY😮😮😮

​@@rosie1719no

Head up move by the Air France crew to stay off the radio and only ask to you want us to get off the runway

And the previous plane might have left some objects on the runway so the risk of incident is of course higher.

😂😂😂😂😂

Or the Gerard Finneran United Airlines flight in 1995.

The reason for staying in your seat is that in the event of a fire on brake/gear, the safest place for passengers and crew is inside the aircraft. If they use the slides, 5-10% of the people will suffer some degree of injury. Just relax and film the trucks outside or read a book while you wait. That sort of occurrence is just a bureaucrat's dream, but apart from that it is nothing special, unless you are a media reporter. Than it is a situation of emergency, fire, panic, tarmac and all the other bs phrases they throw around. I still wonder what a tarmac is at an airport to this day.

Does the 67 do fuel dumping in this situation or is it not equipped or even necessary?

@@falconeaterf15 the 767 does have fuel jettison. An engine fire or failure generally doesn’t constitute a need to dump fuel as prescribed by the QRH. It takes approximately 30 minutes to dump fuel if the center tanks are full and it only dumps from the center tanks.

People were crying, including the pilot sitting next to me in the exit row on an American airlines flight from Charlotte to Tampa Florida. I just laughed and said nothing I can do now. Still traveling every week til today.

@@backbrothers1same here I’ve traveled so much in the pass around 2004 . Twice a week for a long time and I’ve got a lot story . One thing is if you haven’t been in a plane thru a micro burst then you’ll be ok . I been in a few and its like being on a amusement ride . The plane drop 1000 feet per second

Ive lost two engines on separate occasions. One in a light WW2 era aircraft. The other in a helicopter. Pilots train for it. But it always comes as a shock when it actually happens. The shock only lasts a moment because you are so busy trying to solve the situation. You're mind is working at light speed and things around you really do seem to slow down. Not an experience I want again.

Scary

That's insane! Thank God they were OK!

Looked like it landed heavy, not sure pilot had time to dump all fuel, so would explain damage to plane

@@jeffs2629 nope, no fuel dumping.

@@jeffs2629 all heavy landing inspections and sudden stop inspections showed zero damage from them

I was thinking the same thing. Did the plane instinctively delay his takeoff roll when he saw what the issue was, or was he instructed by ATC to wait, or is it autoomatic pilot protocol to hold off, when something like this happens ?

I figured the pilot would just turn around and then land on the same runway, but in the opposite direction; wouldn't that have been the quicker thing to do ?

@@timmellin2815Depends on the wind, I’d imagine.

plus runway sweep

Same🙌

Literally every commercial airport is.

And why wouldn't they be? 🤔

Czech Republic is rich and safe country, what do you think they will do, throwing buckets of water and ice cubes at the engine? Dude… 🫣

Well, usually it's only one engine that fails. Otherwise we'd have another miracle on the hudson or sas flight 751 or something

​​​@@0w3nnlong way to the Hudson. Lol

If both engines fail, they've still got the APU. And if that fails, they've still got the windscreen wipers.

@@Otacatapetl That's stretching optimism.

It’s a drone to scare birds.

That’s what I thought too especially seeing all those birds flying around after the takeoff

Yeah so many birds.. Too many trees, bushes, grass around. Must have been the cause

Bird on screen isn't over airport, and isn't big. There is only much closer to camera, which is relatively far from runway. And there are no bush or treas in danger zone of runway. it's just an illusion given by the camera position. I watch Prague airport for a long time, and this is just second more serious situation I saw.

I would be safer if they would eat all the birds.