7:05 please use the proper term. They are called the crusaders. We have Christians living within the Muslim world and had nothing to do with the war between the crusaders and the Muslims. In fact the Muslim armies defended the Christian population who lived within the Muslim world from the crusaders

​@@khaledannajargood point. But it is not inaccurate that the crusaders were Christian forces of the Holy Roman Empire. The Christian throne

May Allah bless him in Heaven

You forgot the nubians.

And Hassasin too..3 in 1

@@clementluqman9761 4

Saladin received the best education a man could have at that time. He was raised among the elites and nobles. While Baibars had a cruel childhood since he grew up in the peak of the mongol destruction. Although he also received a high education when he was brought to Egypt, Baibars didn't grew up in a middle of a trusted family and companions like Saladin did so it's understandable why he became what he became.

@@mindyourbusiness4440 Couldn't agree more, in any case both were great men!!

Aaaaah, what Baibars did was the best way to deal with those bastardly crusaders. With all due respect to Saladin, it was his "mercy" towards certain Crusaders like Balian of Ibelin and Guy De Lusignan, was more than enough to give the Muslims a hard time in the Siege of Jerusalem, the siege of Acre and later the third Crusade. What Baibars did was avoid that silly mistake of allowing the aggressors such gentleness since that was always returned to the Muslims in oath breaking and war. What Baibars did certainly eclipses what Saladin had done. What Saladin did was simply cauterzing a severly infected limb, on the contrary, Baibars cut off that infected limb for good.

@@eldeebcampeador Whilst I partially agree with you but I believe Saladin's actions were better and wiser than Baibars's!! Saladin simply simulated the most merciful act done by the prophet Mohamed ever. When he conquered Mecca, prophet Mohamed gave total amnesty to all the people of Mecca and gave mercy to the very individuals who persecuted him and his followers and showed them greatest of torture. Obviously this noble act of the prophet led to more good than harm. Saladin as a pious and religious man simply wanted to copy this act and follow the path of his prophet, showing mercy to your enemy is a unique quality which is one of the definitions of Islam, and Muslims should apply this quality as best they could regardless of the consequences. Anyway that's my opinion and point of view!!

@@deeipomar2366 Saladin was the embodiment of chivalry.

As it should always be.

"Muhammad is the Messenger of Allah; and those with him are forceful against the disbelievers, merciful among themselves. You see them bowing and prostrating [in prayer], seeking bounty from Allah and [His] pleasure. Their mark is on their faces from the trace of prostration. That is their description in the Torah. And their description in the Gospel is as a plant which produces its offshoots and strengthens them so they grow firm and stand upon their stalks, delighting the sowers - so that Allah may enrage by them the disbelievers. Allah has promised those who believe and do righteous deeds among them forgiveness and a great reward." Qur'an 48;29

yeah, i like him more than saladin since saladin even though he was great was too soft to his enemies and gave them a lot of oppurtunities just to have fair fights instead of always taking advantage of his enemies disadvantage and fighting dirty, war is dirty, you should not fight fair when your enemies would not

No kazakh

@@nurikjakia7879 He is Kazakh.KAZAKH. KAZAKH KIPCHAK BERISH TURKIC. HE IS NOT OGUZ TURK. BEIBARYS KAZAKH 🇰🇿🦅

@@theqazaqnightmare dude doesn't matter he was turkic

@@ayaz6894 "Turkic" is not "Turk"🤣🤣🤣 Turk-🇹🇷 Turkic-🇰🇿🇰🇬🇹🇲

@@theqazaqnightmare We Kıpçak Tatars exist everywhere from Lake Baikal to the Balkans, and have been throughout history.. Judging by the comment you wrote, it is clear that you do not know the definition of Turk's, Turk's history, Turk's tribes, you are not even Turk's since you wrote such a ridiculous answer.. Don't worry about us, and more importantly, don't speak for the Kıpçak Tatars again..

greeting from Ruken aldin Al-Zaher (Baibars) district , Damascus

@@selmanucar7582 theres no translate button so idk what 90% of that says....something about peace i think

Most powerful man in world? Put glasses for see beyond ur penis.

Indeed!

@@sampunay8363 Khalid ibn al Waleed did it first in Islam at least, however, Honeen Battle, Muslims almost got a defeat even the prophet Mohammed was upon them, but Allah responded to his prophet prayers and Allah made them won, so Khalid ibn al waleed didnt got defeated what so ever, and this is a fact, in term of baibars yeah i'm sure he didn't lose one but not sure 100%.

Also Timurlane He is never lose war too

He was an ego maniac and he murdered Saif Qutuz who actually fought for Islam

but he died by murderer how ironic

Sword of Justice I like Baibars more tbh but you forgot Alnasir Muhammed ^_^

Being military ruler Baibars is great but beyond military strategist Salahudeen was campassionate

On the other hand, as has been recently pointed out, though the beginning of Bahri rule is usually dated to 1250, none of the first five sultans were, in fact, members of the Bahriyya. 32 The Arabic sources for the period refer to the dynasty as the dawlat al-atrak, dawlat al-turk, or al- dawla al-turkiyya (i.e. dynasty of the Turks), in recognition of the racial or ethnic group which predominated in the mamluk caste during this period, and to distinguish it from the Burji sultanate in which mamluks Northrup, L. (1998). The Bahrī Mamlūk sultanate, 1250-1390. In C. Petry (Ed.), The Cambridge History of Egypt (The Cambridge History of Egypt, pp. 242-289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521471374.011 The term 'Mamluk Sultanate' is a modern historiographical term.[9] Arabic sources for the period of the Bahri, Mamluks refer to the dynasty as the State of the Turks (Arabic: دولة الاتراك‎, Dawlat al-Atrāk; دولة الترك, Dawlat al-Turk) or State of Turkey (الدولة التركية, al-Dawla al-Turkiyya).[16][17][9] 2. Kitāb Tarjamat thaghr Dimyāṭ al-maḥrūs wa-mā waqaʻa bihā min ʻahd Nūḥ ʻalayhi al-salām ilá ākhir dawlat al-Turk min Kitāb al-ʻAnāṣir li-majālis al-Malik al-Nāṣir : manuscript, [1567] ; Tarjamat thaghr Dimyāṭ al-maḥrūs wa-mā waqaʻa bihā min ʻahd Nūḥ ʻalayhi al-salām ilá ākhir dawlat al-Turk ; Thaghr Dimyāṭ al-maḥrūs wa-mā waqaʻa bihā min ʻahd Nūḥ ʻalayhi al-salām ilá ākhir dawlat al-Turk ; كتاب ترجمة ثغر دمياط المحروس وما وقع بها من عهد نوح عليه السلام الى آخر دولة الترك من كتاب العناصر لمجالس الملك الناصر : مخطوطة، [1567] ; ترجمة ثغر دمياط المحروس وما وقع بها من عهد نوح عليه السلام الى آخر دولة الترك من كتاب العناصر لمجالس الملك الناصر ; ثغر دمياط المحروس وما وقع بها من عهد نوح عليه السلام الى آخر دولة الترك من كتاب العناصر لمجالس الملك الناصر CREATOR/CONTRIBUTOR: Maqrīzī, Aḥmad ibn ʻAlī, 1364-1442, creator مقريزي، أحمد بن علي،, 1364 al-Malik al-Muẓaffar Sayf al-Dīn al-Muʿizzī , third Mamlūk sultan of the Dawlat al-Turk or Baḥrī dynasty. A nephew of the K̲h̲wārazm-S̲h̲āh D̲j̲alāl al-Dīn, Ḳuṭuz (whose original Muslim name was Maḥmūd b. Mamdūd) was taken prisoner by the Mongols and sold to a Damascus merchant who, in turn, sold him to the Mamlūk amīr Aybak in Cairo. Aybak, as the husband of S̲h̲ad̲j̲ar al-Durr, became in 648/1250 al-Malik al-Muʿizz, from which title Ḳuṭuz derived his nisba , al-Muʿizzī. The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Political Theory Leigh K. Jenco, Murad Idris, Megan C. Thomas · 2019 · Political Science The lens of mamlūk military slavery has dominated studies of medieval Egypt. ... dynasty (established by Salāh al-Dīn in the twelfth century) to the Turkish Mamluk sultanate in the mid-thirteenth century. The Oxford Encyclopedia of Medieval Warfare and Military Technology Clifford J. Rogers, William Caferro, Shelley Reid · 2010 · History In general, the Mamluk Sultanate was referred to at the time as the “Turkish state” or “dynasty” ( dawlat al-turk/atrak). In this period the emergence of the Ottoman Turkish dynasty challenged what remained of the Byzantine Empire, eventually absorbing the other Turkish domains in Anatolia, while the Turkic Mamluk Empire “The Fourteenth and Fifteenth Centuries: Emergence of the Ottomans.” Ottoman Dress and Design in the West: A Visual History of Cultural Exchange, by Charlotte A. Jirousek and Sara Catterall, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, Indiana, USA, 2019, pp. 41-78. Mamlūk authors almost always refer to their Sultanate as " the state of the Turks " ( dawlat al - atrāk dawlat al - turk/ al - dawla al - turkiyya ) . They usually seem to be aware of the fact that the reign of the “ Turks " Jerusalem Studies in Arabic and Islam,Volume 39 Magnes Press, The Hebrew University., 2012 The Mamluks (whose name denotes their slave status) were a quintessential Turkic military dynasty. Spannaus, Nathan. “HISTORY AND CONTINUITY: AL-AZHAR AND EGYPT.” Modern Islamic Authority and Social Change, Volume 1: Evolving Debates in Muslim Majority Countries, edited by MASOODA BANO, Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, 2018, pp. 79-101. What they did not know was that with Baybars, a new Turkish dynasty would unify the Islamic Middle East with an uncompromising commitment to jihad not seen since the days of Saladin “BETWEEN THE MAMLUKS AND THE MONGOLS: 1250-1260.” Accursed Tower: The Crusaders' Last Battle for the Holy Land, by ROGER CROWLEY, Yale University Press, NEW HAVEN; LONDON, 2019, pp. 40-50. He ended up assassinating the leading Mameluks, the Turkish dynasty that had held power since the 13th century. “Of Egypt and Levantine Plagues.” Free Trade’s First Missionary: Sir John Bowring in Europe and Asia, by Philip Bowring, Hong Kong University Press, 2014, pp. 73-82.

All of them turks not egyptians Egyptians wont admit turks had many dynasties in egypt and saved them

@@terrybogars8933 our ancestors bought the turks as mamluks for the very purpose of defending our lands which they did. All of those mamluks of various ethnicities, including the turks have become assimilated into our population and culture. There are no Egyptians today who identify as kipchaks, cumans, kurds or circassians, they all speak Arabic and identify as Egyptians. The Mamluks are part of Egypt's historical heritage, not Turkey's.

he must be white and blue eyed

@@drg.naufal He was

@@drg.naufal Lol no 😂😂😂 he was kipchaq turk with Asiatic Mongoloid features, cousins to the mongols. Descended from the xiongnu, a Chinese warrior clan 😊👍🧘‍♂️ that migrated west and make up central Asian DNA

@@sinanermis5541 nope. He has small eyes like the Chinese, and wispy beard. Similar to Atilla the Hun and Timurlane

@@cooljay5330 xiongnu is turkic empire they are not chinese

He was himself a Mongol, a Turk are one of the many Tribes in the Mongols.He used Mongol tactics to defeat the Mongols.

@Tr0ubledCharacter , he was in the Mongol army.And like I said, the Turks are one of many tribes in the Mongols.

@Tr0ubledCharacter , ha ha, you need to get your facts straight! He was was a young Mongol soldier along with Russians, they were in the Golden Horde when his unit lost a skirmish and were captured by the Muslims.That's how he became a slave! The Turks were one of many Mongol-like tribes in Central Asia.The Turks lived west of what is now Mongolia.And guess what? 70% of Genghis Khan's Warriors were Turks.The actual Mongols in Genghis Khan's army were so small because their tribe were a small tribe, in contrast to the Turks who were very numerous in Eurasia.Mongols and Turks were just different tribes of the same Asian steppe people.

@@lakanron640 He was a Kipchak (Turk). Mongol war tactics were already being used by the Turkic nomads. He was sold into slavery at the age of 5.

@@lakanron640turks aren’t mongols.

Hi was not Berish, stop lying. Hi was Kypchak

Baybars was described as tall blonde hair blue eyes he was a circassian Caucasian European native he was not turkic because in the 12th century turkic people still looked like their short squinted eyes chubby cheeks mongolian cousins... Stop disinformation

100% agreed. Edil (volga) - Jaiyq (ural) rivers interfluve and further to Crimea used to be part of cumans who are now “Bayuly” and “Alimuly” tribes union of Kazakhs

A Oguz from 🇹🇷 brother

Cats are disgusting creatures, they are responsible for the extintion of many brids and animals. They kill for fun. They are the only animal I dislike. Mans best friend is the dog

@@CancerExl Shut the fuck up, you dumb afrocentrist idiot.

deeipomar The fondness of Cat is more of Eastern culture thing not just Egyptian. In Somali culture Cats are regarded as special, while dogs are ignored and some cases seen as pest.

Cathal Ó Diubháin The dame way goat, cow, camel is food to humans .. birds are cats food and no gods creation is not disgusting.

Prophet Mohammad and Abu Hurairah were from Arabia and they were fond of cats. I'm Syrian Palestinian and I love cats, specially the cute round fat ones. Have you even seen Istanbul? Though I understand what you mean.

😂😂 No wonder, he was so successful with his Aoe

@@kevinstaedler 🤣🤣🤣✋

He saved neither of, stopthinkibg nonsense.

@@adamnesico Yes he did you fool, Egypt at that time was the final independent Muslim country and if Egypt had fallen the Mongols would easily reach and invade Europe through the South

@@baybarshan2500 According to you Magreb, the Sahara, the sultanate of Delhi, the kingdom of Mali, the swahili city states, Araby... Weren’t muslim, right?

@@adamnesico No but the Seljuks, Abbasids, and Egyptians were !

@@baybarshan2500 doesn’t matter, there were more free muslims states, you just prooved you are unable of properly reason.

Disease an small numbers were the downfall of the crusades

You Americans don't know shit

He didnt saved Islam.

not turkish, maybe in kazakh? (Бай - rich, powerful, барыс - panther,tiger)

Thank you very much!

He is from Western part of Kazakhstan. He was kazakh.

@@SAFlowers Kazakhs are Turkic people

@@godofchaoskhorne5043 they are kypchak turks!

@@godofchaoskhorne5043 they are kypchak turks, i.e. nowadays called kazakhs! But they do not have caucasian look, they look like real kazakhs!

That's correct yes. Thank you for the praise.

Yep!

come on man :/ Mongols and Eastern Turks are have too close culture. Mongol:budhist Turkic:Muslim. this is the only difference between them.

@@turkmapping130 no nothing common

Indeed, I was a narrator on HistoryMarche

@@alexanderdoddy7590 wow bro

Lemme guess, u are egyptian?

Never leave anything half way done. Its too bad his closest relatives did not learn that about Sauds in 1818. Ironic part is that many soldiers of Ibrahim Pasha probably we descendants of Mamluks.

kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rL6ja8-bmczPmX0.html

Well Saladin was Diplomacy leader not warfare commander.

exactly

You forgot that baybars too defeated the nubyans, although not personally. No, didnt turned history.

May Allah forgive him

Kipchak and Cuman Turks were described as tall, pale and blond in general by the Rus, by the Poles and other Slavic people. I'm from a Turkish family of Cuman / Kipchak origin and most of my family is super pale, many are blond with blue or green eyes and almost everyone of us is born blonde with blue eyes but after a year or two some stay blond and with others their hair darkens. I was born blonde with green eyes and my hair turned black as I grew. Curiously my mustache and the hair the part of my beard under my chin is still blonde but the rest is black. My youngest sister is blond with pale blue eyes. So are both my grandfather's. Some of us are tall while others are more average. It's kinda strange. Siblings can look wildly different. One being tall the other being average, one being tanned while the other is pale as paper. One with light blue or green eyes while the other had light brown etc

He was described as tall and pale but not blond haired and blue eyed

@@RandomGuy-df1oy No he very obviously is described as a blond man.

@@barispeace there are many descriptions of him. He was tall, fair skinned, had large head and small eyes

It's also a popular name in Turkish

Circassians has nothing to do with Baibars… absolutely..

He comes from nowadays Kazakh tribe called Bayuly-Bersh being nomad in a western cuman steppe between Volga and Ural rivers

BAYBARS name doesn’t have any meaning in any language but turkic . Bai (or bey) - chief, rich, Barys - leopard

Umm with respect to Egypt look at the 6 day war, the collapse of the conquering of it by Ceaser, Napoleon I, II and III as well as the British, Egypt changed hands many times.

@@sayedhusson3876 ottomans also ruled egypt

Nothing good about egypt.

@@sayedhusson3876 Yeah it sure did and how many did Egypt rise and defeat it's enemies?? Remember the Yom Kippur day?? If it wasn't for the US backing israel, israel would have been no more. Egypt could have defeated the Ottoman empire and took over all of it's holdings if France, Russia, England along with the Ottomans didn't unite to defeat Muhammad Ali Pasha, Egypt stood against the Mongols when the entire world was beaten by them, Egypt stood against the Crusaders and defeated them many times and even took a king as a prisoner. Egypt defeated the Hittites, the Hyksos, the Nubians, the Libyans, the Sea peoples, even the Persians at some point in early history. Don't ever belittle Egypt. No matter our times of weakness, we always make a comeback.

Because Saladin is the man who captured Jerusalem from the Crusaders, but you are correct Baibars performed far better than Salahuddin whose Dynasty was destroy by the same Mongols Baibar's defeated he liberated the Middle East from the Mongols and Crusaders, with the Help of the Great Berke Khan of the Golden Horde.

I can't take fault with a man trying to save his people or culture. They did what they had to do in the times they were living in.

@@fairenough7984 That's true. After all, some of the Crusader leaders and soldiers did some terrible things so one can understand him.

@Arslan Batyrhan Brutal slave soldier and one of Islam's greatest generals and hero.

Same

And khalid ibn al waleed ra the sword of Allah.. They're all great gathered by the true word of Allah which is Islam

Essil M khalid was in the Rashidun time so Saed Mohamud is mentioning him as well

@MAD MAJORDANJO you might actually want to do your proper due diligence. You can literally GOOGLE it bc he is literally a kipchak turk. This information is widely available to you. Don't spread misinformation. All sources say he was a of kipchak turk origin.

@MAD MAJORDANJO let me know how dumb you feel when you actually do real research. All sources say he's a kipchak turk, that's how he was able to defeat the mongols bc he was also a steppe nomad who had the exact same culture as the mongols who rode horses & had paralleled horse archery tactics since infancy & he used the same feigned & retreat tactics against the mongols. Kipchak is today's Kyrgyzstan/ Kazakhstan. You're literally the only soul who says hes "caucasian". All sources say he is a kipchak turk. Do proper due diligence before making a fool of yourself online.

@MAD MAJORDANJO go & invent your history some where else

@MAD MAJORDANJO I really wanna see the look on your face when you realize when you actually do your research & find he actually did look "mongolian"

@MAD MAJORDANJOyou probably also think cleopatra was black too huh

tou are right the golden H. was mislim lead by Berkin khan who also was a amazing mislim leader even tho he was the grand son of Gengiz khan Berkin also saved islam.

Turks are white

Not only white, but some even have green eyes and reddish hair.

@@BOZ_11 Whats white? the name white is only few hundred years old. compare that to over 10000 years of documented world history.

@@IseekHonestY a rose by any other name smells just as sweet

Alex the narrator is from HistoryMarche although he does not run this channel or theirs.

@@PeopleProfiles Well either here or there I can assure you that this narrator is loved by many, as is your channel ❤

U r totally wrong and ignorant. Most of Mamluk sultans were persian and from behind the sea countries 😒

Chris is out original narrator, he will be back soon just needed a break.

@@PeopleProfiles That's awesome to hear. I should tell you though, just finished Baibars's bio video and loved it, I do hope you didn't get me wrong. Thank you for another great documentary video.

No problem, glad you enjoyd it.

The Islamic faith supersedes everything, it makes one strong and dedicated to spread justice.... so the mamluks were serving in the interest of their religion and not themselves (ie revenging)

@@user-hb4bt1rw1j turk,circasian,slav,African whoever or from whenever all mamluks sure were a novel, a people enslaved and rose to kings,sultans,vicars etc. Isn't that bewildering and a marvel underreported and how the present don't study it extensively is sad

@@majid8065 The Beauty of Islam is that it turns a slave into a ruler

He was only enslaved person who became sultan! He was kazakh! He is from kazakh tribe berysh. Western part of kazakhstan famous for warriors! Its no winder that he became sultan. Having strong genes!

Idiocy or indoctrination, probably both.

Stop the cap, literally every gulf Arab kbnow about him and Qutuz, we learned about them in school history books