Dude he’s out there. XD I sympathize for sure but damn. Stick with jiu jitsu eddie

😂😂

🤣🤣🤣

👑👑👑😂😂😂

Why don't we have high quality pictures of all of our equipment. Idk there are just so many ways you can prove it true but they don't do any of them. The backpacks they made would never have done what they claim. So much sussy stuff with the moon landing.

😂😂😂

😂

Eddie Bravo would simply test the camera communication timing with any movement on the moon beforehand.

😂😂😂

Eddie Bravo and Alex Jones entered the chat

Now that you say it I can hear it

Yes!! 😂

Inconceivable

Dude can't use the joystick and jump at the same time...

bruh all I hear is Rex now.

Fuck it let him run the pod from now on

Lmaooooo 😂🤣

No.... we need flint's father.... Who probably did some geo on the moon.

@@T.v.d.V is the moon even real or just an optional illusion? Who knows 🤷🏾‍♂️

I didn't hear one point he made his face was too punchable. Terrible representation for that side of the argument

Bravo

Bro this is comedy, thanks for the laugh dawg 🫡

So you believe the landing was staged!? Hmm

Except there’s no rest for the wicked. Trust me. 😎✌🏻

Sleep paralysis has entered the chat

Your math isn't correct. Probability is multiplicative, not additive. So it's 50% first day, 75% being hit day 1 or 2. 87.5% being hit on day 1, 2, or 3. But your point is correct.

​@@hwhackI love it when people like you cook.

Yeah, I couldn't believe anything else that he said that involved numbers serious after that.

Amen

​@@hwhack That was his point. Did you not watch the video?

Exactly. We’re talking about mankind’s supposed greatest achievement

@@fordifly1368 According to a recent NASA spokesperson they need to solve the problem of going through the Van Allen radiation belt before they can go to the moon!!!

There is so much wrong with NASA and the BS they have told the public.

Of course they still have them.. they’re hidden in a vault

Of course they still have them.. they’re hidden in a vault

That was a lie. They have all the footage. The originals for some of the tapes were reused on later missions.

@@bkanthack "NASA admitted in 2006 that no one could find the original video recordings of the July 20, 1969, landing. Since then, Richard Nafzger, an engineer at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, who oversaw television processing at the ground-tracking sites during the Apollo 11 mission, has been looking for them."

Thank you. Because it never happened 😂

​@bkanthack NASA say it themselves that they lost all the data and videos, but maybe you know something they don't

Probably sold to some ultra wealthy azzhole.

I'm not sure this fella is the brightest.

As soon as I heard him say that I came to the comments lol. What a dumbass

Jealous of your math skills.

That's correct!

​@@beautybird4757It's simple math lol

God made the sun and the moon and the stars !

Yeah, the moons def not real. Same with high and low tides being attributed to the gravity of it. But those are probably fake too right

​@@dirtykingsgaming and humans made god.

And you need to read some books or go back to school if you’re actually serious.

Next thing you’ll tell me the moon isn’t made of cheese! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Scott Steiner, Math.

"I GOTTA DUMB MYSELF DOWN"

🚨🚨🚨

This is the guy???

I came here to say i understand completely and support the actions of buzz.

I'm half way through the interview and this guy is so f***ing stupid. First the flag moving slightly as the astronaut jumps past is static electricity. 2nd lead acid batteries did not power the lunar module it was a fuel cell, tanks of O2 and hydrogen. Simple things he should know. There are better arguments to be made then he is bringing.

​@@JSSTygeryeah. On Sept.9 2002. I totally would've done it too. Aldrin won the self defense case cuz buddy was such a douche about everything (and didn't seek medical attention afterwards)

He said buzz hits like a bitch

Lmfao 😂😂

That is nuts 🌰🥜

Right? I'm still goin' through therapy. {o.0}

I died

Because your KD is .6 LOL jk

Including the reflector that's on the moon that one can point a laser to and get a beam back.

We have satellites that can see the crap we left up there

He has a lot more faith in humanity than I do.

Have we done that yet? Lol

No hes talking about actual doodoo. They took a dump on the moon. Cant fake that.@@thewarrior195

You can literally see the shit they left behind on the moon with telescopes, there are a lot of pictures. I also think that the reason they destroyed a lot of the technology and stuff was because they didn't want the Russians to get ahold of it.

40 years ago everyone thought airliners would follow Concorde lead and air travel would be at Mach 3. How did that work out? Money speaks. Concorde was too expensive to operate and despite 27 years of operation, only had one fatal accident, but it was scrapped and despite all the advances in technology, airlines prioritised capacity over speed. The same goes for the Apollo programme. The reason it has funded, was because of the Cold War, as the Soviets started to scale back and wane, interest shifted towards profitable low orbit space technology for satellite launchs, GPS, telecommunications etc. The best rebuttal to the Moon landing was a hoax theory, was the Soviet's response. They even begrudgingly printed it in Pravda that the hated Americans had landed on the moon. So the Soviet's best scientist's accepted it as fact, despite have every reason to dismiss it.

My dad had lots of sex 40 years ago. Now, i can't even get a girl hold my hand. There you go. Irrefutable refutation of your argument.

@@irisobobo Irrefutable proof.

The budget and manpower were like 50 fold higher in the 1960s, and it still took a decade. While we've always planned on going back, serious plans and money to do it are very recent events. Also, while the physics and math are the same, the technology we're going to use is astronomically (pun intended) different. This means we are basically designing, testing, and building everything from scratch.

We had 6 different moon landings

@@chrischan9318 What the F does that have to do with his statement? NOTHING.

Already been there 6 times, so the funding was cut. You can’t go there without a gigantic budget. It took a long time to find a cheaper way to carry humans there without that original 1960s government funding paying for everything.

@@fishrenfroeboyd7954 Learn to read...they claimed the lost the technology that they had to go to the moon meaning they lost the documentation which is absolute bullshit using today's tech it should be WAY easier to go to the moon..I call bullshit on their statement that they "lost it"

You can't find men with big enough balls to do it these days!

Lunar queefs

I have literally cried laughing for 15 minutes over this comment.

Excuse me is a Queef and a half

A queef is 6 times more powerful on the moon.

This math check out.

Yeah this guy lost any thing he to say after I heard him say that dumb shi!

Everything he said ruins his credibility

You know out of all that was said, I didn’t have a problem with that. Easy mistake to make if you aren’t a math person.

IMMEDIETLY paused and came to the comments once i heard that shit lmao

@@Aeradom2000 he certainly quotes a lot of math as evidence to his claim for someone who doesn't understand math.

lol, same.

What?

Agreed

@@Flat_Earth_Addy Because he gives these arguments that are REALLY EASY to refute. For me, I wish Joe would allow me to sit with him for 30 minutes and write down his best arguments for why we did not go to the moon. Then, I would spend some time on each argument and do research on the web, then I would come back a few days later and have rebuttals for each of his points. It'd be TOO EASY. Because the moon landing is a fact. My father (and mother, both) worked for General Dynamics who helped develop some of the stuff needed for the moon missions, and (when I was a kid) I saw some of it. Thousands and thousands and thousands of people that all broke the problem down into smaller tasks, and America conquered each of those different obstacles. So, it's ludricious to believe that we did not go to the moon. It's too easy to prove that we did.

So, in ways, @KyleKnickerB, is right. The more to listen to someone who is defending quite a contrary position with only arguments like HOW DID THE CAMERA MOVE WHEN SOMEONE NOT THERE TO MOVE IT? And, that's the best argument he has? Or, they DESTROYED ALL THE SCHEMATICS FOR THE EQUIPMENT or ALL THE RECORDINGS TAPES WERE DESTROYED. Well, they destroyed the schematics (probably more lost them), because I said it above. It's like keeping blueprints for the Horse and Buggy. Why keep it? Because no one is gonna build a horse and buggy anymore, and technology for NASA's equipment was outdated before it was even launched. Always, with stuff like that, it is always outdated before used, similar to Microsoft and Xbox where the consoles sold are years behind what is available in PC space -- because it takes time to get through the design phase and make millions of console, and you always do it on hardware and architecture that is already in use, so it's cheap, cheap, cheap to produce. Thus, that's why all of NASA's plans are just junk and useless, worthy of the trash bin. Maybe keep a few plans somewhere, but rest would just be scrapped or recycled. It's take campus-size facilities to store it, keep it air-conditioned, keep it guarded where people won't break-in and sleep there, etc. Basically, this stuff is so simple to defend and to understand, if you drop the conspiracies viewpoint.

😂😂😂💀💀💀

😂😂😂🤭

Underrated comment frfr 🤭

"You keep using that word, I don't think it means what you think it means."

@@SteveAustin-zv1nn 😂

The rest of his evidence was no better. But yeah I found myself zoning out right after he said that

I think that's the most important question.

@@DukeHard you want them to call out the US and incur sanctions & Cia operations? No ones gonna speak out on the world stage like that , theres literally 0 political benefit

They are in on it in order to hide Jesus.🤣

Hahaha there are 9 to 11 satellites right now shooting millions of photos of that landing site, since 1970… dumbest conspiracy ever

They are all buddies, making a show for us, and we are fcking monkeys believing in all their bs.

Finally, an enlightened member of society. Nice to meet you. Also, there's no such thing as the Red and Blue party.. notice how our rights slowly are getting taken away.. notice how there's pics of the Clintons buddying up to Trump.. as long as we're fighting over the idiots, the more they take away.

It's the same with some of the early nuclear explosion films, some of them are 100% fake because they couldn't film in the test sights as the video film would have been distorted by the radiation so they nukes are real but some of the early film is fake for propaganda reasons.

yeah could be. Majority of people who think that any conspiracy about moonlanding is shit sadly didtn even hear about this one...

It's oddly devoid of dust. The thrust should have kicked up a ton of dust. But I'm no moon expert so idk.

What if the majority was blown away on landing? 🤔

It’s a model on wires lol

@@bobbygetsbanned6049 they vacuumed the surface first

Yupp that's why he is a pieceof shit .. hes corrupted , he hasn't been legit since 2013

lolol

10/10

The numbers don’t lie. And they spell ‘disaster’ for you

What happens when adds kurt angle into to the mix?

Same lanes as Schaub, their math goes bowlth waze

Why would that even be the case? Once you escape Earth's orbit, you're 90% of the way to anywhere in the solar system!

Watch NASA’s videos on the challenges of rockets and how going past low earth orbit is impossible with them. You need links or are you capable of finding them?

@@MediaLieDetector I’m not familiar with what you are talking about feel free to send some links. I’m a freshman in aerospace engineering, I would assume you just need to reach escape velocity and have a high Delta V. Which is why it is better to have a three stage rocket. Instead of sending 6.5 million pounds to the moon you are only sending a 63,500 pound Command Service Module(including lunar lander) Each stage gets faster because the rocket loses a lot of mass and is still accelerating. Guy in video doesn’t know what he is talking about. Likely quoting Werner von Braun out of context. I bet he did say that going to the moon would require three rockets, that’s why he built a three stage rocket. The reason I believe in other conspiracies but not this one is because you would think by now there would have been an aerospace engineer that understands the equations of orbital mechanics and equations like the Tsiolkovsky rocket equation that would disprove that the Saturn V was able to go to the moon. The rocket was capable of taking men to the moon and back, therefore we did take men to the moon and back

​@@MediaLieDetectorsounds like you need to do some actual research outside of your flat Earth videos

In the book he doesn't say it's for fuel. He takes inspiration from the Columbus voyage and the extra ships are for spare parts.

It was so satisfying to see you unable to respond to someone you KNOW has actual knowledge on a subject you regularly try to talk down to people about. Not so easy when its not your gullible friends, is it pal? @@MediaLieDetector

I’m always fascinated by how calm and collected he is during some of the more brain dead guests and bozo comments by Joe. Guy must do yoga.

​@@matthewjalovick When you're getting paid like that you would easily shut up

Exactly. He needs a raise😩😩😩

Found the liberal

The dude is like 54 years old

yeah its like, how would they have not already figured that out? I'm pretty sure they tested/knew/understood the time delay long before that craft ever left earth.. i hear dem rocket scientist are pretty good with dem maths

His voice should disqualify him

We have rovers on mars rn that have 13 minutes, 48 seconds delay. NASA is not new to this concept lol. Also 3 second delay for voice around the world is just wrong. idk what "modern technologies" he is thinking of, but something as simple as discord can achieve around a 0.41 seconds even on the other side of the earth

He’s got that “if people are trying so hard to disprove my theory then I must be correct and it’s true” logic

Exaaaaactly. Like they could have tested it and practiced by timing a damn hand movement on the moons surface before liftoff even to make sure it was timed right. Common sense. This guy lacks it

Yeah but buzz still lied trust a guy named buzz 🤣🤣🤡

@@frankcastle2045Right cause all it takes to be invalid is your name 🤦‍♂️

Is this the guy he punched. I can see why.

@sorinsilaghi yes, same guy

☠️​@@farmerdave33

it's not about figuring out how to make the camera tilt, it's about whether it's worth the added weight to do so

Plasma of the sun and the fire of the earth are all plasma phenomena , and pure vacuum is incoherent in Relativity metric system

I love this argument because it’s just common sense. How arrogant do you have to believe that NASA faked the moon landing but didn’t have anyone smart enough to review the footage and see the things you saw?

I mean what if this was literally just the best they could do

@@Crystal__Clearexactly

@@Qrt45because like they said during this interview they never foresaw KZfaq, podcasts etc… so whatever people saw on tv was all they had. No one had vcrs they couldn’t stop and rewatch over and over again to really analyze what they were looking at

@@smturchetta that’s not a good point at all…people didn’t have VCRs yet but film recorders were obviously a thing, and given the importance of the event they would have known that people could and would eventually rewatch the event. How do you think we have the ability to watch it today? Clearly it was understood that you would be able to watch it again.

“It’s called Steelman, it’s illegal in 5 countries. There’s bits of real ivermectin in every bottle.”

People would definitively go skydiving if the chute had a 87% chance of failing and they would definitely succeed the first time.

@@s133p3r0 XD

Ha! I was thinking the same thing.

😂 Rogan has gone from believing in the moon landing, to thinking it’s fake, to believing in it, back to thinking it’s fake.. all in

Yep

The sheer amount of fuel even 1/6 of Saturn rocket to get off the moon I mean come on the tanks would be bigger than the lunar lander easily. This is coming from a believer too.

JR definitely doesn’t believe anyone has stepped foot on the moon, clearly. Disclaimers or not, it’s rather obvious.

nah that shit fake af

@@ZzLiGHTNiNGzZ if you’re special I would see how you think that.

...And that is 150% true.

Prove it. ​@@XxAverageJoexX

@@XEra404 get educated.. or get a telescope. There is shit left on the moon. Tard.

Nothing hs more than 100% chance

​@phnix6242 it can be across time. But in the right now moment or when talking about the total of something it can't be. Look at money, that can increase to over 100% growth. Over 100% things is usually a theory or digital percentage increase

Maybe we can get him to play the lottery lol

it is still very high probability

The math aint mathing

Right??! The fuck, KZfaq... Get it together already...

@@justinklenk don't worry I sent them a sternly worded email

Its soooooo great!!! Fun Stuff

😂😂😂

Nope

ignorance for you must be your favorite ,well keep going !

The only real thing is that every astronuat that went to the moon was as a Freemason 💀💀

Because challenging things Is being an idiot.... Read yourself first

12 people lied bout it? All NASA employees lied bout it? Can't we see rover tracks by hubble.how come Russia n China didn't call bs

Also, it’s expensive

Yeah plus isn't Elon saying this because of the payloads they would be bringing

@@devpandya1715 yea

@@devpandya1715 Yep, Elon is talking about what it will take to bring Starship to the moon and back. A skyscraper of a rocket ship, that will be 100% re-suable compared to an expendable lander where 99% of the mass of the Saturn V was expended.

With that analogy stars cannot burn cuz theres no air.

Um, stars don't actually burn. It's energy released nuclear fusion.

@@swedensbestrapper nuclear fusion and combustion are far and away two different things.

@@drtomintucson exactly

@@swedensbestrapperthere's no logic in your statement lol

He’s just listening man, that’s part of what a podcast is

Joe always does that

It's a clear farce. Its hard to keep a huge lie like this alive. It's so funny that admittedly they couldn't pull off practice successfully, but they traveled into space to a new frontier and accomplished it flawlessly, both there and back on one tank of gas ⛽?? Haaaaaaaa

Small minded peoples always make sure their opinions are the loudest.

Neils a pretentious corporate shill

Is it? I understand he's wrong in this case. But, if something has a 150% chance of happening, and you are able to reduce that chance by 33.33% wouldn't it still have a 100% chance? If it started at 100% that would be reduced to 66%.

@@s133p3r0 You can't have more than 100% chance for something to happen, literally makes no sense.

Are we back in the 90s?

🤣😂🥹😩😭😭🙃🤪

Nah I need someone to laugh at today

That’s kinda what happens when you have the ability to talk to anyone in the world. Say what you want, the man has talked to way smarter people than you.

Like you?

Who you trying to protect

@@north6star Im confused on who you are referring to lol, yea Joe has talked to alot of smart ppl. But this guy aint one of them 😭

Or imagine being the first person to land in 1969 and not got recognized no more....because they think you're lying P.s just a joke, i don't think we went.

@@atimetraveler4910 funny thing is that if we really went, than the astronauts could care less what people like sibrel thinks, it would even annoy them... they would just find that hillarious that we didnt went.

If the sun would destroy the film. That just tells you we never went

I actually did my homework But the dog ate it

The moon is a rest stop for aliens...they didn't want us citizens 2 c so fake ass live feed.

He's also an idiot comparing it to SpaceX's plan on landing on the moon. SpaceX is trying to do it with a giant, re-useable ship. That's why it needs to be refueled in orbit. The apollo lander was like 1/100th the mass of Starship.

You still have to explain why NASA "lost" all of the original video. I've seen the NASA rep say this to a film crew.

@@cdcaleo 1. **Existence of Other Evidence**: Thousands of photos and hours of video footage taken on the moon still exist. NASA also has extensive telemetry data (other than the original SSTV recordings) that document the landings. 2. **Multiple Missions and Witnesses**: There were six Apollo missions that landed on the moon from 1969 to 1972, involving 12 astronauts who walked on the lunar surface. These missions were tracked by multiple independent entities around the world, not just NASA. 3. **Broadcast Footage**: The footage that was broadcast live around the world still exists. This footage was viewed by millions of people as the events unfolded, providing real-time evidence of the landings. 4. **Technological and Historical Context**: The technology to fake such landings convincingly did not exist at the time, and the broader geopolitical context (the Space Race against the Soviet Union, which had the capability to track the missions) supports the reality of the landings.

@@cdcaleo Where did you see that the original video is lost?

@@trevorpullen3199you can google it. They have many excuses why they don’t have the original tapes

Exactly lol

Geaux Tigers.

Answer his argument then instead of insulting him. How did Nixon talk to the Astronauts on the moon with zero delay? I bet you're triple boosted.

Let me ask, why is he stupid to you yet believe what you're taught at school as fact

@@Dmaj089 why do I believe someone with a PHD over this guy??? Is that a serious question 🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️🤦🏾‍♂️

You wouldn't believe how many people the government can keep quiet.

imagination you have not... sure everybody of the 500 000 peopel have detailed info about the whole thing and knew and saw exactly everything... your IQ? 100?

Not to mention the weight of said batteries.

Punched him b/c he wouldn’t swear on bible that he went to moon, seems Buzz acted extremely irrational towards such a simple & easy request. Surprised such unhinged behavior coming from him, which just calls more into question….

@@cryptoesquire3168you forgot to mention that this guy lured aldrin into his hotel room under false pretenses and harassed him

@@alen2773”false pretenses” that’s ironic

Little man syndrome. Emotionally reactive to the point of violence because words/ideas hurt him, without even a personal insult. Feminine. Womanly. Little boy at the most masculine, if that.

Womanly and feminine to be that emotionally reactive about words or ideas without any personal insult added

Keep believing what you want and lying to yourself 🙄

@@MysticWolf1223 Lol 😅 Your statement can be true for yourself! * keep believing what you want and lying to yourself!* What else is a lie? Like the earth is NOT Flat ?

@@MysticWolf1223 Do you know how many mission to the moon ? Supposedly be fake ? Answer: 6 Do you know how many people supposedly walked on the moon ? Answer: 12 Isn’t that funny that America faked moon landing over 6 times!?😅 I think they’re obsessed with this fake project, otherwise why they keep faking it!

ChatGPT is no better than TV, I have some oceanfront property in Montana if you believe that….

@@cryptoesquire3168 Nothing can be trusted. However we can’t use a blank statement saying ChatGPT can’t be trusted at all. Cross-reference check can help. In this case, instead of ruling out ChatGPT response, it is better to see if what is been said can be argued or proven false. I think this explanation seems reasonable in this instance at list on this point, as I did a research on ChatGPT response and it could well be a true response to that question.

Clearly a joke. Everyone knows this, but they’re really good at doing what they’re told (and they’re told to mock anyone who even brings this subject up).

Nothing about his body language or delivery indicates that was a joke. You're literally the only person that thinks that.

And you've clearly never been to Iraq calling someone back home. There absolutely is a delay.

@@kevindflowers234 yeah but we've all skyped with people on the other side of the world with ZERO delay

​@@kevindflowers234I have with almost no delay. The moon takes under 2 seconds for a radio wave to reach.

@@ryankowalski3670 are you stupid to understand how much technology has advanced since 1972 or do you wanna go back to listening to al your music on 8 tracks because its just the same

@@kevindflowers234 Skype is not a good example but Video games can answer your question here, More specifically PING, adding the input lag from a mouse is usually (0-10 ms) and the PING of (0-30 ms) there's no way a delay of 3 seconds would happen even from the other side of the world.

I talk to my buddy in Australia (im UK) we tested the delay and it's about 1-2 seconds depending on connection. Amazing really.

Remote control?

You people can’t even work through the simplest of ideas in your head like a mounted camera but you think you can out think literal rocket scientists. Where did you find such confidence with such room temperature iq.

Right lol

@@smithical100 They pretend that did not exist.

I’m here for it bruh.

😂😂😂

😂😂

because its fake

It would disturb the landing sites, for one thing. But India's Chandrayaan-2 orbiter takes high-resolution photos of the landing sites whenever it passes overhead, as does NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter.

@@CountArtha HIGH resolution photos... really... can you post a link... i read once about a "high resolution photos" and than lolled at the TINY TINY TINY stuff "visible" there

With people on board.

What is the Artemis program?

Show me please

Yeah, show it.

Yeah the USSR/Russia, and the Entire World (at least 50 other spacefaring nations) would have to be in on the hoax.. which would mean that all the wars and conflicts around the world are also fake.. (all these countries cant 'hate' each other, but then still agree to the 'space lie', someone would get fed up and expose it).. and its all for what? just so a handful of gov's can skim a fraction of a penny from their tax dollars? ..That doesn't make sense, they could easily write whatever they wanted to scam into any random defense bill and no-one would know or care.. no need to create 50+ agencies around the world with thousands of potential whistle blowers, and countless 'fake' photos for anyone to debunk at any time.. Its almost like it would actually be cheaper and easier to just do the things they say they are doing, than to risk one whistle blower exposing the whole scam..??

Trueee

Fake

subscribers means very little now days.. you can buy them with bots.. how many views does his videos get thats the question.

Rich people do stupid things all the time. The cyber truck fiasco for example.

Didn’t Jamie say that

Von Braun originated the multi stage idea.

Lolz

Bro. We STILL get data from Voyager 1 that was launched in 1977 and is outside the heliosphere. Stop it.

​@@wealthedgedata. Not video.

Exactly.

@@joneconomidis2125 and what is video? data?

@@gatonegro187 Yea but if you have ever tried downloading anything from the internet, you would know there is LIGHT YEARS difference between downloading a movie vs a text file. Thats even with todays high tech tech. Now imagine something a human lifetime older. No way!

They simply put the cameras in mini concrete bunkers that had foundations that ran deep into the ground. Not that complicated actually.

​@@Yabuddy53 Well even if that was true its filmed from an unobstructed angle, meaning there is a large opening in the structure. And given the extreme heat and subsequent devastation, it would be impressive if it survived that. I never thought of it until I saw an episode of JRE where they talk about this subject. They watch a video with a house and a parked car in frame, and as the blast hits, the car vanishes, and then magically reappears moments later. I'm not theorizing anything, it's just weird. But I would not be surprised if they added some Hollywood magic in some form given the nuclear arms race that went on at the time.

​@@ChristianTDMyou know cameras can zoom in right

@@justinc4924 Sure. I dont know the quality of their zoom though, in 1950.

Shouldnt stop Ever.

And still the greatest conspiracy today. Should still be talked about in 3024

Should've been happening from day one. The truth needs to be known once and for all that the government cannot be trusted.

Von Braun made a video stating that it would take 3 rockets taller than the Empire State Building to reach the Moon. All this was based on his calculations. The problem he said was How do we station the other rockets along the trajectory and how do we transfer the astronauts into them? Low earth orbit is all there is and NASA has posted that fact many, many times.

​@@MediaLieDetectorwhat do you mean with low earth orbit Is all there Is?

@@o.fm.a5573 If you understood that, you would be way ahead of most people.

@@MediaLieDetector Von Braun was a supporter of the apollo program all the way to its end, and very annoyed that they didn't continue to Mars exploration. He wrote to Kennedy insisting that a moon project was the only reasonable way to beat the soviets. He helped design the Saturn rocket. How can you cite Von Braun to undermine the feasibility of a rocket he helped design?

​@@MediaLieDetectorwhere is the video? What documents do you have showing that NASA has said LEO is all that is possible?

His old ass didn’t do anything

​@@hage352he actually did. Buzz Aldren is a mean dude.

@@LA-hx8gj 93 year old man?

@holdenagee6948 this was 10-15 years ago, but he doesn't mess around with moon-landing deniers.

@@LA-hx8gj So he physically assaults someone because of their opinion? That’s nice

No man, it's the people that won't believe anything that the government really loves. Because the crazies will deny that the sky is blue and birds are real, so it makes people ignore them. Which discredits them when they're actually right. Look at Alex Jones. The elites were ecstatic that he kept talking about demon lizards as he was also talkiabout epsteins island.

Hes looking into it.

😂

Haven't heard that phrase since Looney Tunes lol

Thuffering thuccotash

Inconceivable!

Look up radial and axial dissipation too.

@@Razehell42 Look up "big ass recievers".

@@Razehell42 Doesn't it depend on wavelength?

@@Android811 It also depends on the size of the receiving antenna. The Deep Space Network antennas on Earth are 112 feet wide.

You ever see it?

@@oxfordslim305yes bro it’s not hard

@@oxfordslim305 You can aim a laser at the landing sight and you will get a retro-reflector hit at the same frequency but with the proper delay for the distance. Proof? Not enough for some people.

@@cameronthomas7522 show me. I’ve never seen it😂 y’all believe the vaccine worked to huh

If you zoom in with your phone you can even see the American flag.

I think it’s panning because they said they messed up the timing of it panning on a few of the prior attempts

​​@@smturchetta correct. By the time they did the last lift off from the moon, the guy responsible for the panning said he messed up most of the previous lift off's and got it perfect on the final one.

Yea lack of oxygen makes things you know… not burn the same as on earth. 😉

@@arekay21 , lack of oxygen? They’ve shown the American 🇺🇸 blowing in the wind on the moon. 😂

Because that is your starting point, not your conclusion.

I remember, I asked you for a light

Alice?

Still here, just fought off some nzis.

Same!