More pls

To many romans die here

You know, there were a lot of times when I wondered whether my complete and utter nerdiness in spending weeks messing around with making arrow flight paths as realistic as possible was worth it. This video has shown me that it definitely was, all those arrows coming down looked amazing!

Crassus was a fool But also his avenger won because he had the high ground

Also, random bit of info, Crassus didn't actually have his men form a testudo at Carrhae, hence why the horse archers did so much damage. Years later Mark Anthony got stuck is pretty much the same situation and DID form testudo. He managed to retreat back into Roman territory with about a third of his force left. Not much better, but it helped I guess xD

Dude has like a single battle under his belt 💀

​@@wankawanka3053 nope he was quite popular in Parthia before this battle

lol he had conquered modern day afghanistan for the parthians

@@wankawanka3053 In only single battle he Crushed rome. Iranians in that period were born with sword.

Had a lot of women in his harem ​@@wankawanka3053

Same with spanish "Craso error"

@@dhaz4455 same with Swahili, crassa mukule

same with German "Krasser Fehler"

Ohhh so that’s what a crass mistake is

Que massa! Aqui no Brasil eu nunca ouvi essa expressão, vou pesquisar

✨Esta batalla es una demostración palpable de que la legión era tremendamente vulnerable a dos aspectos de la guerra asiática: El caballo de guerra asiático y el arco. La caballería arquera de los partos ANIQUILÓ a las legiones de Craso EN CAMPO ABIERTO. No estamos hablando de una emboscada ni un audaz golpe de mano como la que perpetraron los germanos y britanos, sino la tactica y estrategia asiáticas desarticulando y aplastando a la legión romana explotando sus tremendas limitaciones. La legión no estaba preparada para enfrentar caballería que la rodeara y lanzara nubles de flechas sobre sus hombros. La legión no podía ir ni al frente, ni al costado y menos retroceder...PORQUE ESTABA DISEÑADA PARA ENFRENTAR BÁRBAROS CON CARA PINTADA Y ESPADAS LARGAS. Pero los comandantes romanos y no creían ni por asomo de la invencibilidad de sus fuerzas armadas y abandonaron toda idea de conquista más allá del Eufrates...porque sabían para que fue hecha la legión. ✨LOS ROMANOS INTENTARON INVADIR PARTIA Y FRACASARON. Invadieron una parte del país solo para fracasar después. Partia era muy amplia y ahora se sabe que las supuestas caídas de la capital de Partia fueron inventos de los historiadores romanos que inventaron victorias que nunca acontecieron. Emperadores romanos varios solían inventar falsas victorias sobre Partia cuando en realidad los romanos se retiraban del territorio supuestamente invadido. En esta batalla se demostró las falencias tácticas y estratégicas de la Legión, falencias que permanecieron inalterables hasta su ocaso. Saludos 👍

Too bad he got executed right after LOL

He’s no general patton but it’ll do I guess 🤷‍♂️

@@crocop6873 he wasn't one of the great generals just someone who uses tactics ... the roman general on the other hand was an idiot

He wasn't Persian though. Parthians were of Scythian descent, and had nothing to do with either Achaimenid or Sassanid Persia

@Hoàng Nguyên The thing is, the Roman army was at an advantage at one point but Crassus's greed got the better of him and his outmanoeuvred army got slaughtered.

@@JosephGibson Crassus was advised by his Armenian allies and local Roman commanders not to leave the river and march his largely infantry army out into the open and largely waterless desert, but he was in a hurry to close with the Parthians. Although he is remembered for being uniquely foolhardy, he would not be the last Roman general, or emperor to be defeated by the Parthians over the coming centuries. They were always one of Rome's toughest adversaries.

@@dpeasehead Who where the toughest adversaries of Parthians?

@@Phed98 themselves ! because of their decentralized government there was always internal conflict after death of their kings. Actually that's how they were destroyed. Local ruler of Persia destroyed parthians and created sassanid empire.

@@alim-xf7wz That counts for every civilization; I meant foreign adversaries

Yes, that's why Carrhae will always be one of my favorite battles. Crassus forgot that Rome had beaten Spartacus only when its leaders stopped underestimating him and his lieutenants and called the overseas armies home to bring overwhelming force to bear. Surena tricked Crassus into believing that he only had to deal with a short lived arrow storm instead of an all day deluge. And contemporary accounts stated that the Parthians composite bows penetrated everything; including chain mail armor, and that the arrows even pinned the Romans' shields to arms and their feet to the ground.

Crassus army got crushed because they have no ceasar in the battlefield.

@ what could Caesar do in such a situation? Romans had lost the battle before it even begins. When Crassus trusted Parthian double agents Ariamnes and Agbar and rushed into the flat part of mesopotamian desert which was perfect for cavalry maneuvers. Roman legions were adapted to fight in Europe,not middle east deserts. They were too slow,too stationary and the only fighting style they were trained for was hand to hand combat. They didn't even know you could destroy your enemy without even touching him. They learned this in hard way and I doubt even Caesar could do any better in desert fight with troops who couldn't even ride a horse,let alone fight on it or shoot. Caesar had no chance and that was the exact reason Cassius,a veteran of Carrhae,killed him,to spare Rome another humiliating defeat.

Looks like legionares were no matach aginst persian immortals

@@user-hj8mz3hp3s Umm No. It was Steppe Horse Archers and Parthian Heavy Cavalry. Immortals were gone by this time and revived during the Sassanid era.

Thanks a lot mate, this means a lot to me! :) Actually I have, but I don't share it that much because I don't want to make anyone feel obligated to give me anything, only the ones who wish to donate. :))

@Arnold Wilson It was known as "The Disaster of Carrhae." You bet they lost :)

@I'm Wasim which muslims? It was 700 years before that useless religion was created...

@@rouslant in your mind than which religion is useful?

@@muhammadrafae2965 every religion is useless, but christian and muslim religions are by far the most useless of them all. You have to understand that before Islam, many other religions did exist with lots of people worshiping lots of random shit. A religion is nothing more than a sect that has taken the power. Nothing more. Free people don't need religions.

Both battles we gave those french a dam good thrashing

@@myview5840 you lost this war at the end lol

Henry V has left the chat

@@myview5840 you need to do some research

@@louislieb4794 you burnt the girl child as a heretic at the end

Yep Hannibal was one of the first wasn’t he?

Battle of Cannae was other one worth to mention. What a similarities in the titles.

JESUS CHRIST will come very soon!

This is the touch of high culture.

Ah, these archers were copying the Brits who came 1,500 years later. The Brit archers used to h9ld two fingers up to the French adversaries to demonstrate their power. That sign remains as an insult six centuries later. Languages change but gestures do not.

I thought that mid finger was established as to threaten someone using sex.

I love shit like that, thanks for the knowledge

A Parthian HORDE Ned! in an OPEN FIELD!!!

Crassus was unaware of any Cataprachts; the fact that this portion of the Parthian army were all on horseback was throwing him for a loop which is why he first ordered his Legions into an extended line with Cavalary on the wings but mid deployment ordered them into a hollow square but it did"nt help much against Surenas"s backup of 1000 Camels loaded with extra arrows so they continue the hail until dusk

Knight Heaven nice

@Antoine M You know, he committed the same error in Hattin.

@GiustiziaSpietata actually, Crassus commanded the legions that defeated Spartacus and his gladiator army, but Pompey took the credit. So, I'm not ready to say he was a bad general. Not going through Armenia at the invitation of the King has puzzled many. Maybe Crassus wanted all the glory and didn't want to share it with Armenia.

SavageJunky war

@Ken Penalosa no they were in dezful

@Arnold Wilson they might become slaves or executed

@Arnold Wilson What ken said might actually have some truth to it. Yes, they did become slaves, but it's speculated that these roman slaves later on found their way east. There were chinese records of them encountering a group of soldiers using a "fish scale" looking formation which might actually be referring to the testudo, among other theories. It's interesting stuff honestly ^^

They were not Persians. Parthians are a different Iranic people.

Ya its too bad the paranoid parthian king executed him.

@@lastword8783 It's not certain, another record suggests that he was killed trying saving Orodes form an assassination attempt!

not persian but parthian

ouai mais il s'est fait suriné

@@aramokurdo they are same people

Thanks a lot mate, I wasn't sure about this one but it's great to hear that!

The next Persian Empire namely the Sassanid Empire was famous for its Cataphracts. Parthians were famous for their archers.

They are Parthians, not Persians...

@@historicahellenistica2762 They are both Iranian dynasties. Same country, different tribes and yet same blood. Get some education, kid.

@@historicahellenistica2762 achaemenid, parthian, sasanian were persians :)

​@@ebparsa "Kid" ? Lol i'm 44 years old and teacher of history... Persians and Parthians are not the same people, the Parthians came from the Parni tribes, even if they belong to the big family of Iranian people like the Scythians. Parthians take over the uses of the Achaemenid Persians but that does not make them Persians. I have nothing to learn from you, shut your mouth

Unfortunately you’re living in21 century, Iran is a piece of shit right now

@@yangdu7767 HAHAHAHAHA True 😀

Greetings! I'm so glad for it, thank you mate! :)

Please make a video for sassanid empire wars and romans

@@NedimCanIncebay strange that his king killed him after this victory , just because was jealous ?! even Stalin was jealous on Georgy Zhukov ,the Marshal of USSR who defeated Nazy Germany in 1945 ,but after the victory's parade of Red Army held in Moscow , just gave him a new job in a small office of a military base ,far away from Moscow...until pension...

Scarface92511 why call it a noob formation..

Ken Penalosa only that alexander never failed or suffer any losses in all his fights/war

GiustiziaSpietata he was he fought along Sulla in his civil war

GiustiziaSpietata and also he is the guy who defeated Spartacus

Dietoxickid The2nd they want to show Crassus weak to deny how powerful Iranian empires were,it’s unfair that west never see any goodness in the east.

Rome II Total War, modded of course. Because Creative Assembly doesnt really put passion into these games.

@Emperor Mithridates من از سرزمین مادهستم دوست من قوم ماد پارت وپارس همگی از یک نژاد و ریشه زبان آنها یکی است همگی قوم آریایی هستند که در فلات ایران زندگی میکنند زبان مادی ما اندکی فقط درلهجه فرق دارد و به آسانی باهم گفتگو میکنیم اگر مردمان ما اختلاف داخلی نداشتند ما براحتی برتمام قاره ها مانند امپراطور کوروش و داریوش هخامنشی فرمانروایی میکردیم حتی در قرن جدید چون ما سرزمین قهرمانان و دانشمندان و ثروت های بسیارزیادطبیعی هستیم افسوس که نالایقان بطورعجیب برماحاکم شدند هر زمان حاکمان لایق و شایسته داشتیم بسرعت در علم و جنگ ها پیروز میدان میشدیم

@@mehdihajian4138 sabías palabras , solo hay una raza humana somos nosotros africanos asiáticos americanos y europeos .

We are also Aryans. Love from India (Aryavart)

@@saranshdubey707 no you are pa-jeet

@@Pike737 didn't understand what you said, please say properly

lool that one is definitely Flawless O.O

Imagine the Sasanid's cavalry then

Hahahah, It became 7, Crassus' son and his bois joined the room! Thank you mate! :)

No arminius🤣

the others is from the survivors Romans

But now some roman soldiers dislike it too lol

nope it`s devil now, 666

✨Esta batalla es una demostración palpable de que la legión era tremendamente vulnerable a dos aspectos de la guerra asiática: El caballo de guerra asiático y el arco. La caballería arquera de los partos ANIQUILÓ a las legiones de Craso EN CAMPO ABIERTO. No estamos hablando de una emboscada ni un audaz golpe de mano como la que perpetraron los germanos y britanos, sino la tactica y estrategia asiáticas desarticulando y aplastando a la legión romana explotando sus tremendas limitaciones. La legión no estaba preparada para enfrentar caballería que la rodeara y lanzara nubles de flechas sobre sus hombros. La legión no podía ir ni al frente, ni al costado y menos retroceder...PORQUE ESTABA DISEÑADA PARA ENFRENTAR BÁRBAROS CON CARA PINTADA Y ESPADAS LARGAS. Pero los comandantes romanos y no creían ni por asomo de la invencibilidad de sus fuerzas armadas y abandonaron toda idea de conquista más allá del Eufrates...porque sabían para que fue hecha la legión. ✨LOS ROMANOS INTENTARON INVADIR PARTIA Y FRACASARON. Invadieron una parte del país solo para fracasar después. Partia era muy amplia y ahora se sabe que las supuestas caídas de la capital de Partia fueron inventos de los historiadores romanos que inventaron victorias que nunca acontecieron. Emperadores romanos varios solían inventar falsas victorias sobre Partia cuando en realidad los romanos se retiraban del territorio supuestamente invadido. En esta batalla se demostró las falencias tácticas y estratégicas de la Legión, falencias que permanecieron inalterables hasta su ocaso. Si César se hubiese enfrentado a los partos ,Hubiera sido derrotado y humillado. Cesar estaba hecho para enfrentar a galos, germanos y a otros romanos; no a una verdadera potencia como Partia. Saludos de Perú 🇵🇪🤝🇮🇷

Completely same people, Parthian and Persian are western Iranian both of them with Median

Persians and parthians are like azerbaijanis and turks

@@Secular_Iran_GE Yes, two separate branches of the same tree

@@historicahellenistica2762 then its related to each other

Alexander was macedon but actually Greek Parthians and Persians were same and Iranian

There was no Iran. These were Scythians. Even the general was not a foreighner.

@@lilalali6753 in Parthian era the name of the country was "Aryân", the word had some changes during years and in Sâsânian era the country was called "Erân" , and now is called "Irân"

@@NaderKhorasani so at that time there was no Iran with modern Iranians. There was Parthia with Scythians in it, if I am not mistaken. Surena was not a modern Iranian by blood. Just like the modern Egyptians are not ancient Egyptians in any way.

@@lilalali6753 Surena was Iranian(Aryânian) from "Sakestân" province(nowaday Sistân province), "Sistân" means the place that many Scythians live

@@NaderKhorasani if Surena was a Parthian general looking like a Parthian, acting like a Parthian living in a place where many Scythians lived how on earth can you clame that this man was the great iranian general? I think, it is utterly disrespectful against Surena, his own identity and against those nations who are in fact descendants of the Scythians, Parthians. Is it not called stolen valor?

"GG"

He died swallowing boiling gold, what a magnificent death for such a terrible man and history villain. Long live Spartacus and his rebellion against slavery and tyranny.

@@ernestov1777 Ernesto is a fool. If Spartacus had managed to escape with his army, certainly he had conquered some territory then establishing democracy, human rights, feminism, and gay rights. Ridiculous fool

@@OtaBengaBokongo What?

@@ernestov1777 Ernesto is a fool

@@ernestov1777 Lmao what? Persians only held slaves in last years of Sasanid's era, while Sasanians were the golden age of Iran, but their last years before arab's invade was full of cruelty

Thanks a lot mate! :))

Thanks a lot!

Thanks a lot, I'm so grateful for that! :)

Thank you mate, I'm grateful for that! :)

Yes you need more support keep it up!!!!!

they shot him in the nuts!!!!

It's great to hear that, thanks a lot mate! :)

I'm so grateful brother, thank you! :)

But a great victory for the Parthians!

I think back in the day the Romans would've addressed this as a travesty more then anything else

Roman empire was a big grinding mill ... they deserved this annihilation.

And a true persian victory this was

Thanks a lot mate, I'm glad you like the video and the models! :) (Huge thanks to Ancient Empires mod team)

You are not persian it’s absolutely not the same people

@@speeder-011 in 1935 the country made the official name Iran, before that it was known as Persia. Therefore your ignorant ass is dead wrong but keep tryna tell a resident of Iran that he’s the wrong one.💀

@@Twitchinout ok

@@speeder-011 but thet were still iranians Maddians + parthians + persians = Aryans Iran = The homeland of Aryans

Saludos 🇵🇪🤝🇮🇷

Hay que ser bien ignorante para pensar en esto de supremacias y lo que fuera.

✨Uno de esos cruciales aspectos que hay que considerar es que la LEGIÓN había sido diseñada para imponerse sobre los enemigos de la cuenca del Mediterráneo y de Galia y Germania. ¿Cual era la guerra que los romanos tenían que enfrentar? Pues la de los bárbaros de Galia y Germania, sin contar la de España o las islas británicas: guerreros que en masa atacaban sin concierto y disciplina y se estrellaban contra los grandes escudos romanos hasta ser apuñalados con los cortos gladius si es que sobrevivían a la andanada de pilones. Sin embargo las legiones por lo general estaban hechos para enfrentar a galos, germanos y a otros romanos; no a una verdadera potencia como Partia.

@@sagamaster124 keep joking about Romans

@@md6584 NADIE DESMERECE A LOS PARTOS: TODO LO CONTRARIO, SIEMPRE ME PARECIÓ QUE SE EXAGERE DEMASIADO CON LOS ROMANOS 👇 Los romanos cuando sobrepasaron sus limites: norte de britania, mas allá del Rhin y del Eufrates FRACASARON. ni siquiera pudieron dominar por completo la isla de Britania. Una cosa es hispania (poblado por pueblos salvajes y feroces) y otra muy distinta parthia. las tácticas de las legiones eran tan irresistibles en el territorio europeo gran parte del cual era llano por mas que la península itálica sea montañosa. Donde mejor se comportaron las legiones romanas fue en Africa, la Galia, sur de Bretaña y en Grecia donde pudieron exhibir lo mejor de su táctica y disciplina. Caminaban grandes distancias y combatian al mando de sus capacitados comandantes. Un Mario un Sila un Escipion, un Pompeyo, un César eran geniales conductores militares que conocian las capacidades pero tambien las limitaciones de sus fuerzas. Siempre Roma será la gran potencia militar y cultural de occidente en su época. Siglos antes y siglos después de Cristo. Madre de la civilización occidental que finalmente se volcó sobre el mundo con la Revolución Industrial En esta batalla se demostró las falencias tácticas y estratégicas de la Legión, falencias que permanecieron inalterables hasta su ocaso. ✨Esta batalla es una demostración palpable de que la legión era tremendamente vulnerable a dos aspectos de la guerra asiática: El caballo de guerra asiático y el arco. La caballería arquera de los partos ANIQUILÓ a las legiones de Craso EN CAMPO ABIERTO. No estamos hablando de una emboscada ni un audaz golpe de mano como la que perpetraron los germanos y britanos, sino la tactica y estrategia asiáticas desarticulando y aplastando a la legión romana explotando sus tremendas limitaciones. La legión no estaba preparada para enfrentar caballería que la rodeara y lanzara nubles de flechas sobre sus hombros. La legión no podía ir ni al frente, ni al costado y menos retroceder...PORQUE ESTABA DISEÑADA PARA ENFRENTAR BÁRBAROS CON CARA PINTADA Y ESPADAS LARGAS. Pero los comandantes romanos y no creían ni por asomo de la invencibilidad de sus fuerzas armadas y abandonaron toda idea de conquista más allá del Eufrates...porque sabían para que fue hecha la legión. ✨LOS ROMANOS INTENTARON INVADIR PARTIA Y FRACASARON. Invadieron una parte del país solo para fracasar después. Partia era muy amplia y ahora se sabe que las supuestas caídas de la capital de Partia fueron inventos de los historiadores romanos que inventaron victorias que nunca acontecieron. Emperadores romanos varios solían inventar falsas victorias sobre Partia cuando en realidad los romanos se retiraban del territorio supuestamente invadido. PD: BROMEANDO? SI NO ARGUMENTA NO LE ENTIENDO NADA 🤷‍♂️. SALUDOS.👋

Sorry for the late reply, just saw it, thank s a lot mate, I'm so, so grateful for that! :)

Good to hear that, thanks a lot mate! :))

I'm so grateful for that, thank you! Çok teşekkür ederim dostum cansın. :)

I'm glad you like it, thank you! :)

Whoever looks at the soil of Iran with a bad eye, you will understand this calamity

@@NedimCanIncebay Whoever looks at the soil of Iran with a bad eye, you will understand this calamity

@@NedimCanIncebay Whoever looks at the soil of Iran with a bad eye, you will understand this calamity

@@Iraniangirls2023 i look at iran with a bad eye. Noe wot

As i know in iran this war known as confrontation of east and west.

Lol at the end their stupid king ordered Surena's execution

Shame what happend to parthia afterwards. Parthians gotten a good beating.

​@@diadokhoi5722 and while getting a "good beating" we captured a roman emperor in battle :)) . lick your wounds mate. #valerian

@@amirfarahbakhsh2960 doesn't matter the city was after it's mercy because of their idiot king, still a total lost in the end! 😑

I'm so grateful mate, thanks a lot! :)

Thanks a lot! :)

They fought for achemedia not some clown from dessert

Can you make one with Romans looking like Jews and Americans.

@@donq2957 bruh what?

Why? Parthia it was not Persia...

Thanks a lot! :)

Thanks a lot mate! :)

Thanks a lot! :)

Ruben Roque, that was under Sassanid reign, the dynasty that followed the Parthian empire. The king Shapur I captured Valerian, a Byzantium emperor and pour molten gold into his mouth. At Narqsh-e Rostam, in modern day Iran, in the fars province, you will find a massive sculpture depicting valerian at the foot of Shapur I. I’ve been there and I’ve seen it.

1- There is no reliable historical report on Parthians having done that to Crassus. 2- History says that after being defeated in Edessa battle, Valerian was captured and up on signing a treaty Shapur allowed him to go back to Rome. Wikipedia’s account that Valerian died in Iran, is not supported by reliable sources. So, filling his mouth with molten gold could not have happened.

@@32sadi wow look at the pro historian right here

@@SweetOne968 No that was Crassus ! Valerian story is different, he was captured & used as a footstool for the great king of kings ! Two different stories in two different eras my friend!

Thats for sassandis not partians

Seems like ,that's what happen to surena

Zhukov and Surena were mistreated by their leaders. Musa bin Nusayr is also an example who was a talented Ummayad commander who had conquered North Africa for the Muslims only to be forced retired from the army and property confiscated. He was left to beg on the streets of Damascus.

Unfortunately

The Persians say he was assassinated by the Romans for revenge.

It’s obviously that suren family was strong enough in military and surena was damn rich and after this war he was so much popular so he was a big danger for the king if he was looking for the greatest political power to be the shahanshah of Aryana or iran the king of persians medians,schytians,bacterians parthians and other people’s Another fact that parthians were strong in front of foreign powers but weak in front of internal powers because of their power system.

@@aradsstates9584 So a foreign power should have attacked Parthians by internal side

@@Phed98 that's how Sassanids got into power, exploiting in weak tribal nomad clan based system of the Parthian government.

Thank you both for subscribing and the comment! :)

The scale of Carrhae is much larger than that of Agincourt numbers wise for sure.

😏😏😏😏🇮🇷❤️😘

Thank you! :)

✨Esta batalla es una demostración palpable de que la legión era tremendamente vulnerable a dos aspectos de la guerra asiática: El caballo de guerra asiático y el arco. La caballería arquera de los partos ANIQUILÓ a las legiones de Craso EN CAMPO ABIERTO. No estamos hablando de una emboscada ni un audaz golpe de mano como la que perpetraron los germanos y britanos, sino la tactica y estrategia asiáticas desarticulando y aplastando a la legión romana explotando sus tremendas limitaciones. La legión no estaba preparada para enfrentar caballería que la rodeara y lanzara nubles de flechas sobre sus hombros. La legión no podía ir ni al frente, ni al costado y menos retroceder...PORQUE ESTABA DISEÑADA PARA ENFRENTAR BÁRBAROS CON CARA PINTADA Y ESPADAS LARGAS. Pero los comandantes romanos y no creían ni por asomo de la invencibilidad de sus fuerzas armadas y abandonaron toda idea de conquista más allá del Eufrates...porque sabían para que fue hecha la legión. ✨LOS ROMANOS INTENTARON INVADIR PARTIA Y FRACASARON. Invadieron una parte del país solo para fracasar después. Partia era muy amplia y ahora se sabe que las supuestas caídas de la capital de Partia fueron inventos de los historiadores romanos que inventaron victorias que nunca acontecieron. Emperadores romanos varios solían inventar falsas victorias sobre Partia cuando en realidad los romanos se retiraban del territorio supuestamente invadido. Resumiendo: ✨Uno de esos cruciales aspectos que hay que considerar es que la LEGIÓN había sido diseñada para imponerse sobre los enemigos de la cuenca del Mediterráneo y de Galia y Germania. ¿Cual era la guerra que los romanos tenían que enfrentar? Pues la de los bárbaros de Galia y Germania, sin contar la de España o las islas británicas: guerreros que en masa atacaban sin concierto y disciplina y se estrellaban contra los grandes escudos romanos hasta ser apuñalados con los cortos gladius si es que sobrevivían a la andanada de pilones. Sin embargo las legiones por lo general estaban hechos para enfrentar a galos, germanos y a otros romanos; no a una verdadera potencia como Partia A su nivel.

It's great to hear that mate, thanks a lot! :)

Ac Ze even for persian or iranian like me is tragedy how fool crassus was ,i wish two great powers never had war each other too loose so many lands to muslim arabs in the future.

You know, roman army invaded persians. it means the persians were not the villain. the were defending their lands. plus they were out numbered massively. Even if you wanna make a movie from this, you would not put it in tragedy genres. it's more like science fiction, history and based on true story movie. xD

Tragedy?

I mean at the beginning it's good, but when it's just played through the whole video it sounds kinda dumb.

واقعا با این فیلم میتوان به بزرگی و وحشت جنگ های قدیم پی برد

Thanks a lot for the comment! :) I'm planning to cover more battle in the future, I hope one day I can do something for WWII and WWI. :)